CHAMGAP
VERIFIEDPassed the Codex final verification and publication gate. Evidence-verification cutoff: 2026-07-19. AI was used for research and drafting; the existence of all 3 cited sources was verified at the original page, followed by blind grading, adversarial audit, and build validation. Methodology v1.0.
Verdict No. 704 · Search date 2026-07-19 · Methodology v1.0

Levonorgestrel,
does it really help with Emergency contraception and pregnancy prevention after unprotected intercourse?

30-Second Summary
B
Evidence Grade B · 72 · Safety caution
Levonorgestrel lowers pregnancy risk when taken promptly after unprotected intercourse, but it is not completely effective
Nausea, headache, fatigue, abdominal pain, and transient early, delayed, or irregular next menses may occur. Markedly delayed menstruation or severe lower abdominal pain requires evaluation for pregnancy or ectopic pregnancy.
What the
research shows
Single-agent levonorgestrel is rated B because it lowers pregnancy risk when taken as soon as possible after unprotected intercourse. In a WHO multicenter randomized trial, the observed pregnancy rate within 72 hours was 1.1% with levonorgestrel and 3.2% with the combined Yuzpe regimen. A pooled analysis of 6,794 participants in four WHO trials found a marked increase in pregnancy risk when dosing was delayed to day five. Pregnancy is a direct endpoint, but untreated placebo trials are ethically limited and prevented-fraction estimates depend on uncertain estimates of expected pregnancy, limiting the grade to B.
What the
ads claim
Claims of 100% postcoital prevention or equal efficacy several days later are exaggerated. Levonorgestrel can fail, reliability is lower when treatment is delayed, particularly by day five, and efficacy is poor once ovulation has advanced. It neither replaces regular contraception nor terminates an established pregnancy.
*

Useful facts when choosing a product

  • The standard single-agent levonorgestrel emergency-contraception regimen is commonly one 1.5-mg dose taken as soon as possible after unprotected intercourse.
  • Another act of unprotected intercourse after the dose is not covered, so condoms or another contraceptive method are needed.
  • A markedly delayed next period, unusual bleeding, or severe lower abdominal pain warrants pregnancy testing and clinical evaluation.
  • Emergency contraception is not a replacement for regular contraception and does not terminate an established pregnancy.
ID

Chamgap Semantic Classification Code

Candidate index · review held

UNK.levonorgestrel.UNK.emergency-contraception-and-pregnancy-prevention-after-unprotected-intercourse.prevent.active

Unknown > Levonorgestrel > Unknown > Emergency contraception and pregnancy prevention after unprotected intercourse > Occurrence-prevention claim > Active comparator

An automated migration candidate, not an issued permanent code; exact claim scope remains under review. This machine-generated migration candidate helps retrieval but is not a permanent assignment. The original verdict ID and URL remain authoritative.

Download semantic index (JSON) · Codebook v1

Gap Measurement · Verdict 704 · B 72
What advertising claims
What independent, higher-quality research supports
△ GAP
01

What the research actually shows

The 1998 WHO trial assigned 1,998 women requesting treatment within 72 hours after one act of unprotected intercourse to two 0.75-mg levonorgestrel doses or the Yuzpe regimen. Pregnancy rates in evaluable participants were 1.1% versus 3.2%, and nausea and vomiting were less frequent with levonorgestrel. A later WHO trial supported a single 1.5-mg dose by showing it was not inferior to two 0.75-mg doses. In a pooled analysis of 6,794 women from four trials, day-by-day differences were unclear through day four, but dosing on day five carried approximately sixfold higher pregnancy odds than dosing on day one, supporting treatment as soon as possible.

02

Why this is classified as B (72)

The independent double-blind WHO trial across 21 centers found 11 pregnancies among 976 levonorgestrel recipients versus 31 among 979 Yuzpe recipients, RR 0.36 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.70). The direct endpoint supports B, but no untreated placebo group exists, the 85% prevented fraction depends on expected-pregnancy calculations, and day-five efficacy is uncertain, preventing A and giving 72 points. Temporary bleeding changes and nausea remain separate safety issues.

Counterpoint. Depending on timing and individual circumstances, a copper intrauterine device or ulipristal may be a more effective option. Availability, contraindications, and the treatment window should be compared promptly with a clinician.

Rejudgment record. New verdict — Accepted positive actual-pregnancy outcomes from WHO multicenter active-control trials and pooled analyses, but applied B because untreated placebo controls are ethically unavailable, prevented fractions rely on expected-pregnancy calculations, and uncertainty remains by ovulation timing and body weight

▦

Sub-claim grades by effect

This ingredient is marketed for several effects. A single overall grade blends strong and weak claims together, so each effect is graded separately here. The overall grade reflects the strongest disconfirming or core claim.

Effect (sub-claim)GradeBasis
Pregnancy prevention with levonorgestrel emergency contraception within 72 hoursBA large active-control trial found fewer actual pregnancies, but no untreated placebo control exists.
Equivalent efficacy immediately before or after ovulation?Ovulation timing is difficult to establish, and mechanistic and clinical uncertainty indicates limited efficacy once ovulation has advanced.
Equivalent efficacy at higher body weight or body mass index?Subgroup data conflict and the core trials in this file do not establish equivalence.
Replacement for regular contraception or termination of an established pregnancyFEmergency contraception does not protect subsequent intercourse and does not terminate an established pregnancy.
✓

Cross-check — AI research and Codex final gate

AI was used for research and drafting. Blind grading, adversarial audit, and the methodology boundary rules were then reapplied before Codex performed the final evidence, grade, copy, and build checks. If a grade cannot be narrowed, both evidence positions and their reasons are published.
03

Evidence Table

StudyDesignSampleFundingEndpointResultWeight
WHO Task Force 1998Double-blind randomized active-control trial at 21 centers1,998 randomized; pregnancy outcome available for 1,955World Health Organization research supportActual pregnancy after treatmentLevonorgestrel 11/976 (1.1%) versus Yuzpe 31/979 (3.2%); RR 0.36 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.70).Key large randomized trial with a direct pregnancy endpoint
Piaggio G et al. 2011 WHO pooled analysisPooled analysis of four WHO randomized trials6,794 women who received levonorgestrelWHO-associated noncommercial researchActual pregnancy rate by delay to treatmentDifferences on days two through four were unclear, but pregnancy odds on day five were almost sixfold those on day one.Defines timing dependence and uncertainty on day five
§

Receipt — 3 References

All 3 cited sources were verified for existence at the original page (as of 2026-07-19).

Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation. Randomised controlled trial of levonorgestrel versus the Yuzpe regimen of combined oral contraceptives for emergency contraception. Lancet. 1998;352(9126):428-433. PMID: 9708750.
checked
Piaggio G, Kapp N, von Hertzen H. Effect on pregnancy rates of the delay in the administration of levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a combined analysis of four WHO trials. Contraception. 2011;84(1):35-39. PMID: 21664508. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.11.010.
checked
Cleland K, Raymond EG, Westley E, Trussell J. Emergency contraception review: evidence-based recommendations for clinicians. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;57(4):741-750. PMID: 25254919. PMCID: PMC4216625. DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000056.
checked
Research and draft: AI used · Cross-check: blind grading and adversarial audit
Final verification and publication gate: Codex · Evidence date: 2026-07-19 · Corrections: none
↗

Cite this verdict

Levonorgestrel x emergency contraception after unprotected intercourse Evidence Grade B card
[Chamgap] Levonorgestrel x emergency contraception after unprotected intercourse — Evidence Grade B·72. 3 cited sources checked. Source: https://chamgap.com/en/verdicts/womens/levonorgestrel-emergency-contraception-after-unprotected-intercourse/ · CC BY 4.0

CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution; do not distort grades, numbers, or verdict meaning.

!

What this document does and does not do

Chamgap is an information source. It reports what research has and has not confirmed; it does not tell readers what to take or buy. That decision belongs to readers and, when needed, medical or legal professionals. This verdict reflects literature available up to the search date and may change as new research appears. Nothing here is medical advice.
↑