CHAMGAP
APPROVEDReviewed and approved by the Chamgap Editorial Team (2026-08-01). The draft was written by AI, the existence of all 1 cited sources was verified at the original page, and the verdict passed blind grading and adversarial audit. Methodology v0.6.
Verdict No. 1917 · Search date 2026-08-01 · Methodology v0.6

Tirbanibulin 1% ointment,
does it really help with Complete day-57 clearance of actinic keratoses on the face or scalp treatment field?

30-Second Summary
C
Evidence Grade C · 54 · Safety caution
Short-term complete clearance was substantial, but recurrence was common and independent confirmation is absent
Erythema occurred in 91% and flaking or scaling in 82%, generally transient. Application-site pain occurred in 10% and pruritus in 9%, so the ointment should be used as prescribed.
What the
research shows
The grade is C. In two identically designed 351-participant trials, complete clearance at day 57 was 44% versus 5% and 54% versus 13%; both primary endpoints succeeded at P<0.001. Both trials were Athenex-sponsored and assessed the primary outcome before eight weeks, while estimated one-year lesion recurrence among complete responders was 47%, giving C with 54 points.
What the
ads claim
A five-day application course does not mean the field remains clear for a year. Marketing should pair day-57 clearance with recurrence and avoid unsupported superiority claims over active treatments.
*

Useful facts when choosing a product

  • The tested regimen was tirbanibulin 1% ointment once daily for five consecutive days over a 25-cm2 field.
  • Day-57 complete clearance meant a 100% reduction in baseline lesions within the treatment field.
  • No existing verdict for the same tirbanibulin and clearance combination was identified.
Gap Measurement · Verdict 1917 · C 54
What advertising claims
What independent, higher-quality research supports
△ GAP
01

What the research actually shows

Each multicenter double-blind trial randomized 351 participants and analyzed 175 versus 176 in trial 1 and 178 versus 173 in trial 2. Participants applied ointment once daily for five days to a 25-cm2 facial or scalp area containing four to eight lesions. Both day-57 complete-clearance primary outcomes succeeded. Among 174 tirbanibulin complete responders at day 57, the one-year Kaplan-Meier estimate was 47% for recurrent lesions and 73% for recurrent or new lesions.

02

Why this is classified as C (54)

Both trials reproduced roughly 40-point absolute gains in complete clearance, but the shared manufacturer program and short day-57 primary assessment give C with 54 points.

Counterpoint. Common one-year recurrence limits durability but does not negate the short-term primary endpoint.

Rejudgment record. Cross-check applied — Both 351-participant Athenex trials succeeded on day-57 complete clearance, but the assessment was under 12 weeks and no independent replication was identified

Scoring profile behind this grade
EndpointPPatient-reported treatment goal - the symptom is the goal
ReplicationR1Single confirmatory trial
IndependenceI0Evidence comes only from manufacturer studies
Effect sizeE+Meets the clinically important threshold

The scoring table and the verdict agree (C).

Sub-claim grades by effect

This ingredient is marketed for several effects. A single overall grade blends strong and weak claims together, so each effect is graded separately here. The overall grade reflects the strongest disconfirming or core claim.

Effect (sub-claim)GradeBasis
Complete clearance at day 57CBoth trials succeeded, with 44% versus 5% and 54% versus 13%.
Partial clearance at day 57CPooled partial clearance was 72% versus 18%, difference 54 points (95% CI 48 to 60).
Sustained complete clearance at one yearDOnly initial complete responders were followed, and estimated sustained complete clearance was 27%.

Cross-check — Codex and Claude

This verdict was drafted by Codex through literature review and source-existence checks, cross-checked through blind grading and adversarial audit, and settled by reapplying the methodology boundary rules. Cases with split grades were resolved through rejudgment.
03

Evidence Table

StudyDesignSampleFundingEndpointResultWeight
Study 1Multicenter randomized double-blind vehicle-controlled phase 3 trial176Funded by AthenexPrimary complete clearance of all treatment-field lesions at day 5777/175 (44%) versus 8/176 (5%), difference 40 points (95% CI 32 to 47), P<0.001.Pivotal manufacturer confirmatory trial
Study 2Multicenter randomized double-blind vehicle-controlled phase 3 trial using the identical protocol173Funded by Athenex; same program as trial 1Primary complete clearance of all treatment-field lesions at day 5797/178 (54%) versus 22/173 (13%), difference 42 points (95% CI 33 to 51), P<0.001.Replication within the same manufacturer program
Study 3Follow-up of day-57 complete responders174Funded by AthenexRecurrent and new lesions through one yearEstimated recurrence 47%, recurrent or new lesions 73%, and sustained complete clearance 27%.Supportive durability evidence
§

Receipt — 1 References

All 1 cited sources were verified for existence at the original page (as of 2026-08-01).

Blauvelt A, Kempers S, Lain E, et al. Phase 3 Trials of Tirbanibulin Ointment for Actinic Keratosis. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(6):512-520. PMID: 33567191. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2024040.
checked
Draft and rewrite: Codex (AI) · Verification: Codex blind grading and adversarial audit · Final adjudication: Claude
Reviewed and approved: Chamgap Editorial Team · Approval date: 2026-08-01 · Corrections: none

Cite this verdict

Tirbanibulin 1% ointment x complete clearance of facial or scalp actinic keratosis Evidence Grade C card
[Chamgap] Tirbanibulin 1% ointment x complete clearance of facial or scalp actinic keratosis — Evidence Grade C·54. 1 cited sources checked. Source: https://chamgap.com/en/verdicts/skin-hair/tirbanibulin-actinic-keratosis-complete-clearance/ · CC BY 4.0

CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution; do not distort grades, numbers, or verdict meaning.

!

What this document does and does not do

Chamgap is an information source. It reports what research has and has not confirmed; it does not tell readers what to take or buy. That decision belongs to readers and, when needed, medical or legal professionals. This verdict reflects literature available up to the search date and may change as new research appears. Nothing here is medical advice.