CHAMGAP
VERIFIEDPassed the Codex final verification and publication gate. Evidence-verification cutoff: 2026-08-26. AI was used for research and drafting; the existence of all 1 cited sources was verified at the original page, followed by blind grading, adversarial audit, and build validation. Methodology v0.8.
Verdict No. 2902 · Search date 2026-08-26 · Methodology v0.8

Three months of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy,
does it really help with Noninferior 3-year disease-free survival versus six months in high-risk stage II-III colorectal cancer?

30-Second Summary
B
Evidence Grade B · 76 · Safety caution
Three months preserved recurrence outcomes while sharply reducing cumulative neuropathy
Oxaliplatin causes cumulative-dose-dependent peripheral neuropathy that may persist or become permanent. Grade 2 or worse neuropathy was 25% with three months and 58% with six months.
What the
research shows
The grade is B. In 6,088 SCOT participants, 3-year DFS was 76.7% versus 77.1%, difference -0.4 points. HR 1.006 (95% CI 0.909 to 1.114) stayed within the 1.13 margin. Grade 2 or worse neuropathy fell from 58% to 25%.
What the
ads claim
This does not mean everyone can receive half the chemotherapy. It balances a bounded recurrence risk against major neurotoxicity reduction.
*

Useful facts when choosing a product

  • Oxaliplatin neuropathy is cumulative-dose dependent and may persist permanently.
  • Grade 2 or worse neuropathy was 25% versus 58%.
Gap Measurement · Verdict 2902 · B 76
What advertising claims
What independent, higher-quality research supports
△ GAP
01

What the research actually shows

SCOT was an open-label phase 3 randomized noninferiority trial of 6,088 patients. Four-gate bias review: ① defect: noninferiority design; ② listed item: noninferiority design; ③ source prespecified 'less than a 2.5% fall in 3 year disease-free survival' and HR margin 1.13, while the CI upper bound was 1.114; ④ avoidable: yes, so it counts once. Survival censoring was not dropout. MRC and Cancer Research UK supplied public/nonprofit funding. Verdict 2901 is B with 76 points and uses the same duration-shortening concept in HER2-positive breast cancer, but for trastuzumab cardiotoxicity rather than colorectal-cancer oxaliplatin neuropathy.

02

Why this is classified as B (76)

One large publicly funded hard-outcome noninferiority trial gives B with 76 points.

Counterpoint. Regimen and recurrence risk require individualization.

Rejudgment record. New verdict — Large publicly funded hard-outcome RCT meeting a prespecified margin, with noninferiority design counted

Scoring profile behind this grade
EndpointHHard endpoint - actual events such as death
ReplicationR1Single confirmatory trial
IndependenceI2Decisive evidence is publicly or non-profit funded
Effect sizeE+Meets the clinically important threshold

The scoring table and the verdict agree (B).

Sub-claim grades by effect

This ingredient is marketed for several effects. A single overall grade blends strong and weak claims together, so each effect is graded separately here. The overall grade reflects the strongest disconfirming or core claim.

Effect (sub-claim)GradeBasis
Noninferior 3-year disease-free survivalBThe CI upper bound 1.114 stayed within 1.13.
Reduced peripheral neuropathyBGrade 2+ neuropathy fell from 58% to 25%.

Cross-check — AI research and Codex final gate

AI was used for research and drafting. Blind grading, adversarial audit, and the methodology boundary rules were then reapplied before Codex performed the final evidence, grade, copy, and build checks. If a grade cannot be narrowed, both evidence positions and their reasons are published.
03

Evidence Table

StudyDesignSampleFundingEndpointResultWeight
Study 1International phase 3 open-label randomized noninferiority trial6,088Public/nonprofit funding including MRC and Cancer Research UK3-year disease-free survival76.7% versus 77.1%, HR 1.006 (95% CI 0.909 to 1.114), margin 1.13; grade 2+ neuropathy 25% versus 58%.Pivotal large hard-outcome evidence
§

Receipt — 1 References

All 1 cited sources were verified for existence at the original page (as of 2026-08-26).

Iveson TJ, Kerr RS, Saunders MP, et al. 3 versus 6 months of adjuvant oxaliplatin-fluoropyrimidine combination therapy for colorectal cancer (SCOT). Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:562-578. PMID: 29611518.
checked
Research and draft: AI used · Cross-check: blind grading and adversarial audit
Final verification and publication gate: Codex · Verification cutoff: 2026-08-26 · Corrections: none

Cite this verdict

Benefit of 3-Month Adjuvant Oxaliplatin Chemotherapy for Noninferior 3-Year Disease-Free Survival in High-Risk Stage II-III Colorectal Cancer Evidence Grade B card
[Chamgap] Benefit of 3-Month Adjuvant Oxaliplatin Chemotherapy for Noninferior 3-Year Disease-Free Survival in High-Risk Stage II-III Colorectal Cancer — Evidence Grade B·76. 1 cited sources checked. Source: https://chamgap.com/en/verdicts/gut/three-month-oxaliplatin-colorectal-cancer-dfs/ · CC BY 4.0

CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution; do not distort grades, numbers, or verdict meaning.

!

What this document does and does not do

Chamgap is an information source. It reports what research has and has not confirmed; it does not tell readers what to take or buy. That decision belongs to readers and, when needed, medical or legal professionals. This verdict reflects literature available up to the search date and may change as new research appears. Nothing here is medical advice.