CHAMGAP
VERIFIEDPassed the Codex final verification and publication gate. Evidence-verification cutoff: 2026-08-18. AI was used for research and drafting; the existence of all 1 cited sources was verified at the original page, followed by blind grading, adversarial audit, and build validation. Methodology v1.0.
Verdict No. 2730 · Search date 2026-08-18 · Methodology v1.0

Caplacizumab,
does it really help with Faster platelet response and fewer clinical events in acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura?

30-Second Summary
C
Evidence Grade C · 46 · Safety warning
Caplacizumab improved platelet response and a secondary clinical composite but increased serious bleeding
Serious adverse events excluding TTP occurred in 32% versus 16%, and serious bleeding occurred in 11% versus 1%. Mucosal bleeding is common and serious bleeding requires specialist monitoring.
What the
research shows
The grade is C with 46 points. HERCULES randomized 145 patients to caplacizumab, 72, or placebo, 73. Median time to platelet-count normalization was 2.69 versus 2.88 days, 0.19 day (about 4.6 hours) shorter, while the instantaneous probability of normalization was 1.55 times as high (95% CI 1.10 to 2.20; P=.01). Importantly, the prespecified secondary clinical composite of TTP-related death, recurrence, or major thromboembolism was markedly lower, 12% versus 49%. The primary outcome, however, was time to laboratory platelet normalization, with no validated minimum important time threshold and a small absolute difference.
What the
ads claim
Faster platelet normalization and a reduced secondary composite are real findings, but they cannot be restated as proven mortality reduction. The trial was not designed to assess survival benefit, and bleeding harm must be considered.
*

Useful facts when choosing a product

  • The registration is NCT02553317.
  • Efficacy used all 145 randomized patients; safety used 144 treated patients.
  • Serious bleeding occurred in eight caplacizumab patients (11%) versus one placebo patient (1%).
ID

Chamgap Semantic Classification Code

Candidate index · review held

UNK.caplacizumab-added-to-standard-plasma-exchange-and-immunosuppression.UNK.faster-platelet-response-and-fewer-clinical-events-in-acquired-thrombotic-thrombocytopenic-purpura.improve.MULTI

Unknown > Caplacizumab added to standard plasma exchange and immunosuppression > Unknown > Faster platelet response and fewer clinical events in acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura > Improvement claim > Multiple: primary unresolved

An automated migration candidate, not an issued permanent code; exact claim scope remains under review. This machine-generated migration candidate helps retrieval but is not a permanent assignment. The original verdict ID and URL remain authoritative.

Download semantic index (JSON) · Codebook v1

Gap Measurement · Verdict 2730 · C 46
What advertising claims
What independent, higher-quality research supports
△ GAP
01

What the research actually shows

This double-blind placebo-controlled trial at 92 sites randomized 145 patients and analyzed efficacy in all randomized patients. The primary endpoint was time to platelet-count normalization. Median time was 2.69 versus 2.88 days, 0.19 day (about 4.6 hours) shorter, while the instantaneous probability of normalization was 1.55 times as high (95% CI 1.10 to 2.20). With no validated minimum important time threshold and a small absolute difference, the effect axis is E~. The prespecified secondary clinical composite of TTP-related death, recurrence, or major thromboembolism fell markedly to 12% versus 49% (P<.001). This clinical benefit is important, but it does not raise the grade because the primary endpoint was laboratory based and the clinical composite was prespecified secondary. Enrollment below 200 was counted as one limitation. The paper states support from Ablynx, and four company employees were coauthors.

02

Why this is classified as C (46)

The laboratory normalization-time primary endpoint had no validated minimum important threshold and only a 0.19-day absolute difference, qualifying as E~; the clinical composite was prespecified secondary, and evidence came from one small manufacturer trial, giving C with 46 points.

Counterpoint. The marked 12% versus 49% reduction in the prespecified secondary clinical composite is important clinical benefit. C describes the primary-versus-secondary evidence structure, not lack of drug activity. This is add-on evidence with plasma exchange and immunosuppression, not replacement-monotherapy evidence.

Rejudgment record. One small manufacturer-funded trial — The laboratory normalization-time primary endpoint had no validated minimum important time threshold and a 0.19-day absolute difference, qualifying as E~, while the marked prespecified secondary clinical-composite reduction, single small manufacturer trial, and serious bleeding were also considered

Stored scoring profile
EndpointSSurrogate marker - laboratory or imaging measures
ReplicationR1Single confirmatory trial
IndependenceI0Evidence comes only from manufacturer studies
Effect sizeE~Statistically positive but below the threshold

Stored derived and displayed grades match; this is not a current recalculation or validity check (C).

▦

Sub-claim grades by effect

This ingredient is marketed for several effects. A single overall grade blends strong and weak claims together, so each effect is graded separately here. The overall grade reflects the strongest disconfirming or core claim.

Effect (sub-claim)GradeBasis
Faster platelet-count responseCThe rate ratio was 1.55, but the primary outcome was laboratory based.
Reduced composite of TTP-related death, recurrence, or major thromboembolismCRates fell markedly to 12% versus 49%, but this was a prespecified secondary outcome.
✓

Cross-check — AI research and Codex final gate

AI was used for research and drafting. Blind grading, adversarial audit, and the methodology boundary rules were then reapplied before Codex performed the final evidence, grade, copy, and build checks. If a grade cannot be narrowed, both evidence positions and their reasons are published.
03

Evidence Table

StudyDesignSampleFundingEndpointResultWeight
Scully M et al. 2019 HERCULESDouble-blind placebo-controlled phase 3 randomized trial at 92 sites145 randomized and included in intention-to-treat analysis, 72 caplacizumab and 73 placebo; 144 in safety analysisAblynxTime to platelet-count normalizationMedian 2.69 versus 2.88 days, a 0.19-day (about 4.6-hour) difference; instantaneous normalization probability 1.55 times as high (95% CI 1.10 to 2.20); prespecified secondary clinical composite 12% versus 49%; serious bleeding 11% versus 1%Single manufacturer-funded trial with a laboratory primary outcome; the prespecified secondary clinical composite supports substantial clinical benefit
§

Receipt — 1 References

All 1 cited sources were verified for existence at the original page (as of 2026-08-18).

Scully M, Cataland SR, Peyvandi F, et al.; HERCULES Investigators. Caplacizumab Treatment for Acquired Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(4):335-346. PMID: 30625070. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1806311. NCT02553317.
checked
Research and draft: AI used · Cross-check: blind grading and adversarial audit
Final verification and publication gate: Codex · Evidence date: 2026-08-18 · Corrections: none
↗

Cite this verdict

Caplacizumab x acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura Evidence Grade C card
[Chamgap] Caplacizumab x acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura — Evidence Grade C·46. 1 cited sources checked. Source: https://chamgap.com/en/verdicts/general/caplacizumab-acquired-thrombotic-thrombocytopenic-purpura-platelet-response/ · CC BY 4.0

CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution; do not distort grades, numbers, or verdict meaning.

!

What this document does and does not do

Chamgap is an information source. It reports what research has and has not confirmed; it does not tell readers what to take or buy. That decision belongs to readers and, when needed, medical or legal professionals. This verdict reflects literature available up to the search date and may change as new research appears. Nothing here is medical advice.
↑