CHAMGAP
VERIFIEDPassed the Codex final verification and publication gate. Evidence-verification cutoff: 2026-08-07. AI was used for research and drafting; the existence of all 3 cited sources was verified at the original page, followed by blind grading, adversarial audit, and build validation. Methodology v1.0.
Verdict No. 2364 · Search date 2026-08-07 · Methodology v1.0

Balanced crystalloids versus saline,
does it really help with Lower mortality than saline in critically ill adults?

30-Second Summary
D
Evidence Grade D · 34 · Safety caution
Balanced crystalloids did not reduce overall ICU mortality
Fluid choice requires clinical assessment of electrolytes, acid-base status, kidney function, traumatic brain injury, and volume.
What the
research shows
The grade is D. Large randomized trials did not show lower mortality. BaSICS reported 26.4% versus 27.2%, HR 0.97 (95% CI 0.90-1.05), and PLUS 21.8% versus 22.0%, OR 0.99 (0.86-1.14), at 90 days. No validated minimum mortality-benefit threshold was identified, so benefit was not disproved and the grade is D rather than F.
What the
ads claim
Different chloride and acid-base effects are physiological facts, not proof of longer survival.
*

Useful facts when choosing a product

  • Saline is 0.9% sodium chloride; Plasma-Lyte 148 replaces some chloride with organic anion buffers.
  • BaSICS and PLUS intervals retained both modest benefit and harm.
  • BaSICS and PLUS are the core pair addressing the same 90-day mortality question. Baxter affiliates supplied trial fluids for both; PLUS reported no Baxter role in design, analysis, or writing.
ID

Chamgap Semantic Classification Code

Candidate index · review held

UNK.balanced-crystalloids.UNK.mortality-than-saline-in-critically-ill-adults.reduce.factorial

Unknown > Balanced crystalloids > Unknown > mortality than saline in critically ill adults > Reduction claim > Defined factorial contrast

An automated migration candidate, not an issued permanent code; exact claim scope remains under review. This machine-generated migration candidate helps retrieval but is not a permanent assignment. The original verdict ID and URL remain authoritative.

Download semantic index (JSON) · Codebook v1

Gap Measurement · Verdict 2364 · D 34
What advertising claims
What independent, higher-quality research supports
△ GAP
01

What the research actually shows

SMART randomized 15,802 in a single-center cluster-crossover design. BaSICS randomized 11,052 and analyzed 10,520 across 75 Brazilian ICUs. PLUS randomized 5,037 and had mortality data for 4,846 across 53 Australian and New Zealand ICUs. New renal replacement in PLUS was 12.7% versus 12.9%.

02

Why this is classified as D (34)

Multiple direct 90-day mortality trials were null, but no validated benefit threshold supports an F grade; D with 34 points.

Counterpoint. Kidney composites and specific subgroups are separate questions.

Rejudgment record. Cross-check applied — Repeated null 90-day mortality in BaSICS and PLUS without a validated threshold excluding meaningful benefit

Stored scoring profile
EndpointHHard endpoint - actual events such as death
ReplicationRXRepeatedly refuted in the same indication
IndependenceI2Decisive evidence is publicly or non-profit funded
Effect sizeE0Null
PrecisionC0The confidence interval leaves room for benefit

Stored derived and displayed grades match; this is not a current recalculation or validity check (D).

▦

Sub-claim grades by effect

This ingredient is marketed for several effects. A single overall grade blends strong and weak claims together, so each effect is graded separately here. The overall grade reflects the strongest disconfirming or core claim.

Effect (sub-claim)GradeBasis
Lower 90-day all-cause mortalityDBaSICS and PLUS were repeatedly null, without a validated benefit boundary.
Lower new renal replacement therapyDPLUS reported 12.7% versus 12.9%.
✓

Cross-check — AI research and Codex final gate

AI was used for research and drafting. Blind grading, adversarial audit, and the methodology boundary rules were then reapplied before Codex performed the final evidence, grade, copy, and build checks. If a grade cannot be narrowed, both evidence positions and their reasons are published.
03

Evidence Table

StudyDesignSampleFundingEndpointResultWeight
Semler et al. 2018 SMARTOpen-label cluster-randomized multiple-crossover trial15,802 participantsVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research and NIH public supportPrimary MAKE30 compositeMAKE30 14.3% vs 15.4%; 30-day in-hospital mortality 10.3% vs 11.1%Mortality was secondary and not directly comparable with 90-day trials
Zampieri et al. 2021 BaSICSMulticenter double-blind factorial randomized trial11,052 randomized; 10,520 in primary analysisBrazilian Ministry of Health and public/nonprofit institutions; fluids supplied by Baxter Hospitalar90-day all-cause mortality1381/5230 (26.4%) vs 1439/5290 (27.2%), HR 0.97 (0.90-1.05)Direct large mortality trial
Finfer et al. 2022 PLUSMulticenter double-blind randomized trial5,037 randomized; mortality data for 4,846Australian NHMRC and Health Research Council of New Zealand; Baxter supplied fluids90-day all-cause mortality530/2433 (21.8%) vs 530/2413 (22.0%), difference -0.15 points (-3.60 to 3.30)Direct null replication by a separate team, with trial fluids supplied by Baxter affiliates in both trials
§

Receipt — 3 References

All 3 cited sources were verified for existence at the original page (as of 2026-08-07).

Semler MW, Self WH, Wanderer JP, et al. Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:829-839. PMID: 29485925. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1711584.
checked
Zampieri FG, Machado FR, Biondi RS, et al. Effect of Intravenous Fluid Treatment With a Balanced Solution vs 0.9% Saline Solution on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients. JAMA. 2021;326:818-829. PMID: 34375394. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.11684.
checked
Finfer S, Micallef S, Hammond N, et al. Balanced Multielectrolyte Solution versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:815-826. PMID: 35041780. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2114464.
checked
Research and draft: AI used · Cross-check: blind grading and adversarial audit
Final verification and publication gate: Codex · Evidence date: 2026-08-07 · Corrections: none
↗

Cite this verdict

Balanced crystalloids versus saline x ICU mortality Evidence Grade D card
[Chamgap] Balanced crystalloids versus saline x ICU mortality — Evidence Grade D·34. 3 cited sources checked. Source: https://chamgap.com/en/verdicts/general/balanced-crystalloids-saline-icu-mortality/ · CC BY 4.0

CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution; do not distort grades, numbers, or verdict meaning.

!

What this document does and does not do

Chamgap is an information source. It reports what research has and has not confirmed; it does not tell readers what to take or buy. That decision belongs to readers and, when needed, medical or legal professionals. This verdict reflects literature available up to the search date and may change as new research appears. Nothing here is medical advice.
↑