CHAMGAP
VERIFIEDPassed the Codex final verification and publication gate. Evidence-verification cutoff: 2026-08-26. AI was used for research and drafting; the existence of all 2 cited sources was verified at the original page, followed by blind grading, adversarial audit, and build validation. Methodology v0.8.
Verdict No. 2969 · Search date 2026-08-26 · Methodology v0.8

Intravenous tranexamic acid 2 g within eight hours of acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage,
does it really help with Improved 90-day functional status on the modified Rankin Scale?

30-Second Summary
D
Evidence Grade D · 34 · Safety caution
Unlike the hematoma-expansion signal, 90-day functional status did not improve
Seizures were similar, 77 (7%) versus 85 (7%), and venous thromboembolism did not increase. The paper reported fewer serious adverse events through day 90 with tranexamic acid, but that does not change the null efficacy result.
What the
research shows
Grade D. In 2,325 TICH-2 participants, the adjusted common OR for the 90-day mRS shift was 0.88 (95% CI 0.76 to 1.03), P=.11. In the latest individual-patient-data meta-analysis, poor functional outcome at 90 days was also null: 53.2% versus 53.6%, adjusted common OR 0.93 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.07). The full randomized evidence to date, not only TICH-2, reaches the same conclusion.
What the
ads claim
Improvement in the secondary imaging endpoint of hematoma expansion cannot be rewritten as successful 90-day functional recovery.
*

Useful facts when choosing a product

  • The mRS ranges from 0, no symptoms, to 6, death; lower is better.
  • Seven-day death and 24-hour hematoma expansion were secondary outcomes.
  • The death-or-dependency sensitivity analysis was also statistically null.
Gap Measurement · Verdict 2969 · D 34
What advertising claims
What independent, higher-quality research supports
△ GAP
01

What the research actually shows

TICH-2 randomized 2,325 patients at 124 hospitals in 12 countries: 1,161 to tranexamic acid and 1,164 to placebo. Ninety-day mRS was obtained in 2,307 (99.2%). The UK NIHR HTA Programme and Swiss Heart Foundation funded the trial; the University of Nottingham sponsored it. Sharp Clinical Services prepared active drug and saline placebo in identical packs at trial expense. No pharmaceutical donation, analysis, medical writing, or publication funding was reported, and registration preceded recruitment.

Axis 6 B0 evidence ① Allocation concealment: "Randomisation was done centrally in real time via a secure website, with stratification by country and minimisation on key prognostic factors." ② Masking: "Treatment allocation was concealed from patients, outcome assessors, and all other health-care workers involved in the trial." The 90-day mRS was collected masked to allocation. ③ Analysis population and missing data: "Analyses were done in accordance with the intention-to-treat principle, with participants kept in the groups to which they were allocated by the minimisation algorithm." Ninety-day mRS was available for 2,307/2,325. ④ Prespecified primary endpoint: "The primary outcome was functional status at day 90, as assessed with the modified Rankin Scale." — matches ISRCTN93732214 · EudraCT 2012-004108-37

02

Why this is classified as D (34)

The large publicly funded patient-centered trial had a null prespecified primary functional outcome, and the meta-analysis of all randomized evidence reached the same null conclusion for 90-day function, giving D with 34 points. Early death and hematoma-expansion signals were present, but author overlap and endpoint hierarchy mean this is not independent replication, so R1 remains.

Counterpoint. Safety and secondary hematoma findings do not rescue the null primary efficacy outcome.

Rejudgment record. Cross-check applied — Null prespecified 90-day mRS in TICH-2, alongside its large publicly funded double-blind intention-to-treat design

Scoring profile behind this grade
EndpointPPatient-reported treatment goal - the symptom is the goal
ReplicationR1Single confirmatory trial
IndependenceI2Decisive evidence is publicly or non-profit funded
Effect sizeE0Null
PrecisionC0The confidence interval leaves room for benefit

The scoring table and the verdict agree (D).

Sub-claim grades by effect

This ingredient is marketed for several effects. A single overall grade blends strong and weak claims together, so each effect is graded separately here. The overall grade reflects the strongest disconfirming or core claim.

Effect (sub-claim)GradeBasis
Improved 90-day functional statusDThe prespecified primary endpoint was null at P=.11.

Cross-check — AI research and Codex final gate

AI was used for research and drafting. Blind grading, adversarial audit, and the methodology boundary rules were then reapplied before Codex performed the final evidence, grade, copy, and build checks. If a grade cannot be narrowed, both evidence positions and their reasons are published.
03

Evidence Table

StudyDesignSampleFundingEndpointResultWeight
Study 1International multicenter double-blind randomized placebo-controlled phase 3 trial2,307NIHR HTA Programme and Swiss Heart FoundationShift in modified Rankin Scale at day 90Adjusted common OR 0.88 (95% CI 0.76-1.03), P=.11Large publicly funded primary functional outcome
Study 2Systematic review and individual-patient-data meta-analysis of randomized trials in acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage90All included trials were at low risk of biasPoor functional outcome at 90 days; seven-day death and hematoma expansionAt 90 days, 53.2% vs 53.6%, adjusted common OR 0.93 (95% CI 0.81-1.07); significant reductions in seven-day death and hematoma expansion (adjusted OR 0.70 for seven-day death)Null 90-day functional result and early secondary signals across the randomized evidence
§

Receipt — 2 References

All 2 cited sources were verified for existence at the original page (as of 2026-08-26).

Sprigg N, et al. Tranexamic acid for hyperacute primary intracerebral haemorrhage: TICH-2. Lancet. 2018;391:2107-2115. PMID: 29778325.
checked
Effect of tranexamic acid for acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. PMID: 42276775.
checked
Research and draft: AI used · Cross-check: blind grading and adversarial audit
Final verification and publication gate: Codex · Verification cutoff: 2026-08-26 · Corrections: none

Cite this verdict

No Benefit of Intravenous Tranexamic Acid for 90-Day Function After Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evidence Grade D card
[Chamgap] No Benefit of Intravenous Tranexamic Acid for 90-Day Function After Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage — Evidence Grade D·34. 2 cited sources checked. Source: https://chamgap.com/en/verdicts/cognition/intravenous-tranexamic-acid-spontaneous-intracerebral-hemorrhage-functional-outcome/ · CC BY 4.0

CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution; do not distort grades, numbers, or verdict meaning.

!

What this document does and does not do

Chamgap is an information source. It reports what research has and has not confirmed; it does not tell readers what to take or buy. That decision belongs to readers and, when needed, medical or legal professionals. This verdict reflects literature available up to the search date and may change as new research appears. Nothing here is medical advice.