CHAMGAP
VERIFIEDPassed the Codex final verification and publication gate. Evidence-verification cutoff: 2026-09-08. AI was used for research and drafting; the existence of all 1 cited sources was verified at the original page, followed by blind grading, adversarial audit, and build validation. Methodology v1.0.
Verdict No. 3042 · Search date 2026-09-08 · Methodology v1.0

Meriva curcumin-phospholipid complex, 2 g/day, as add-on therapy,
does it really help with Improvement of PASI in mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis?

30-Second Summary
C
Evidence Grade C · 50 · Safety caution
Change in PASI is primary here; PASI75, IL-22, and quality of life remain separate.
Caution. Twelve weeks cannot exclude long-term hepatic, biliary, or bleeding risks, and soy-lecithin allergy may matter for this formulation.
What the
research shows
Grade C with 50 points. Adding Meriva 2 g/day to topical steroids produced a larger 12-week PASI reduction, but only 49 of 63 participants completed, manufacturer support was present, and PASI75 was secondary.
What the
ads claim
The trial does not show that dietary turmeric or generic powder treats psoriasis or replaces topical steroids.
*

Useful facts when choosing a product

  • This verdict applies only to the exact formulation, route, dose, duration, population, endpoint, and comparator shown above.
  • Conventional curcumin, turmeric powder, nano or micellar products, phospholipid phytosomes, piperine combinations, swallowed products, and topical oral products are not interchangeable.
  • Caution. Twelve weeks cannot exclude long-term hepatic, biliary, or bleeding risks, and soy-lecithin allergy may matter for this formulation.
ID

Chamgap Semantic Classification Code

Permanent code issued

S.meriva-curcumin-phospholipid.oral.psoriasis-pasi.improve.addon

Supplements and nutraceuticals > Meriva curcumin-phospholipid complex > Oral > Psoriasis PASI > Improvement claim > Add-on to topical steroids

Issued for a specific commercial phytosomal add-on formulation, not generic curcumin. The code identifies the intervention and claim; it never contains the evidence grade, score, or safety result.

Download semantic index (JSON) · Codebook v1

Exact Claim Classification

These independent facets prevent evidence from different forms, routes, populations, effects, and comparators from being mixed.

Intervention classS · Supplement or nutraceutical
Canonical ingredient or interventionMeriva curcumin-phospholipid complex
Source or part usedCurcuma longa curcuminoids in a soy-lecithin phospholipid carrier
Formulation or processingCommercial phospholipid phytosome, approximately 20% curcuminoids
RouteOral
DoseMeriva 2 g/day
Duration12 weeks of treatment and follow-up
PopulationAdults with mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis, PASI below 10
Effect or conditionPASI improvement
Primary endpointChange in PASI at 12 weeks
ComparatorTopical steroids alone in both groups
Duplicate-detection keymeriva-curcumin-phospholipid|phytosome|oral|mild-moderate-plaque-psoriasis|pasi-improvement|12-weeks
Gap Measurement · Verdict 3042 · C 50
What advertising claims
What independent, higher-quality research supports
△ GAP
01

What the research actually shows

Sixty-three adults were assigned to topical steroids plus Meriva or topical steroids alone.

02

Why this is classified as C (50)

A direct positive PASI result is offset by manufacturer support, 22% attrition, small size, and a surrogate scale, yielding C with 50 points.

Counterpoint. PASI reduction and IL-22 moved coherently, but PASI75 was secondary and long-term relapse is unknown.

Rejudgment record. Independent Codex cross-check — One formulation, one route, one population, one claim, one principal endpoint and comparator

Scoring profile behind this grade
EndpointSSurrogate marker - laboratory or imaging measures
ReplicationR1Single confirmatory trial
IndependenceI0Evidence comes only from manufacturer studies
Effect sizeE+Meets the clinically important threshold
PrecisionC0The confidence interval leaves room for benefit

The scoring table and the verdict agree (C).

Cross-check — AI research and Codex final gate

AI was used for research and drafting. Blind grading, adversarial audit, and the methodology boundary rules were then reapplied before Codex performed the final evidence, grade, copy, and build checks. If a grade cannot be narrowed, both evidence positions and their reasons are published.
03

Evidence Table

StudyDesignSampleFundingEndpointResultWeight
Oral Curcumin (Meriva) Is Effective as an Adjuvant Treatment and Is Able to Reduce IL-22 Serum Levels in Patients with Psoriasis VulgarisThe cited design and its allocation, masking, endpoint, and analysis limitations were independently checked.49Funding, product support, employee authorship, and declared conflicts were assessed separately.The principal endpoint is preserved; secondary and mechanistic outcomes remain separate.The verified numerical result is preserved in the English reader answer and rationale; missing confidence intervals were not invented.Evidence weight reflects directness, formulation match, endpoint hierarchy, and verified analysis limitations.
§

Receipt — 1 References

All 1 cited sources were verified for existence at the original page (as of 2026-09-08).

Antiga E et al. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:283634. PMID: 26090395. PMCID: PMC4450233. DOI: 10.1155/2015/283634.
checked
Research and draft: AI used · Cross-check: blind grading and adversarial audit
Final verification and publication gate: Codex · Verification cutoff: 2026-09-08 · Corrections: none

Cite this verdict

Meriva Curcumin Complex for Psoriasis PASI—Positive as an Add-on, With 49 of 63 Completing Evidence Grade C card
[Chamgap] Meriva Curcumin Complex for Psoriasis PASI—Positive as an Add-on, With 49 of 63 Completing — Evidence Grade C·50. 1 cited sources checked. Source: https://chamgap.com/en/verdicts/skin-hair/oral-meriva-adjunct-mild-moderate-plaque-psoriasis-pasi/ · CC BY 4.0

CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution; do not distort grades, numbers, or verdict meaning.

!

What this document does and does not do

Chamgap is an information source. It reports what research has and has not confirmed; it does not tell readers what to take or buy. That decision belongs to readers and, when needed, medical or legal professionals. This verdict reflects literature available up to the search date and may change as new research appears. Nothing here is medical advice.