See title and evidence table for the studied intervention.,
does it really help with The stated clinical outcome in the title.?
research showsThe grade is C with 54 points. The cited primary source was checked directly; see the Korean text and evidence table for exact arm-level results.
ads claimMarketing should stay within the studied population, intervention, comparator, endpoint, and duration.
Useful facts when choosing a product
- The control included exercise-based usual physiotherapy.
- Outcome assessment was blinded.
What the research actually shows
All groups received usual physiotherapy comprising open- and closed-chain exercises, so the control was not no treatment. Retro walking was added three times weekly for six weeks. A senior physical therapist blinded to allocation recorded all outcomes. Inclusion of therapeutic ultrasound in the control could not be verified from the full-text evidence.
Why this is classified as C (54)
The grade is C with 54 points. The cited primary source was checked directly; see the Korean text and evidence table for exact arm-level results.
Counterpoint. Important limitations and alternative evidence are reported in the Korean text.
Rejudgment record. Cross-check applied — Direct source-checked evidence and prespecified axis profile
| Endpoint | P | Patient-reported treatment goal - the symptom is the goal |
| Replication | R1 | Single confirmatory trial |
| Independence | I2 | Decisive evidence is publicly or non-profit funded |
| Effect size | E+ | Meets the clinically important threshold |
The scoring table and the verdict agree (C).
Sub-claim grades by effect
This ingredient is marketed for several effects. A single overall grade blends strong and weak claims together, so each effect is graded separately here. The overall grade reflects the strongest disconfirming or core claim.
| Effect (sub-claim) | Grade | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Primary claim | C | The grade is C with 52 points. The cited primary source was checked directly; see the Korean text and evidence table for exact arm-level results. |
Cross-check — Codex and Claude
Evidence Table
| Study | Design | Sample | Funding | Endpoint | Result | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study 1 | Assessor-blinded three-arm randomized trial | 68 | King Saud University Deanship of Scientific Research | Six-week NRS and WOMAC | NRS change 1.8 versus 1.0; WOMAC change 4.8 versus 2.2 | Pivotal evidence |
Receipt — 1 References
All 1 cited sources were verified for existence at the original page (as of 2026-08-07).
Reviewed and approved: Chamgap Editorial Team · Approval date: 2026-08-07 · Corrections: none
Cite this verdict
[Chamgap] Verdict 2406: backward walking knee osteoarthritis pain function — Evidence Grade C·54. 1 cited sources checked. Source: https://chamgap.com/en/verdicts/joint-bone/backward-walking-knee-osteoarthritis-pain-function/ · CC BY 4.0CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution; do not distort grades, numbers, or verdict meaning.
What this document does and does not do
Chamgap is an information source. It reports what research has and has not confirmed; it does not tell readers what to take or buy. That decision belongs to readers and, when needed, medical or legal professionals. This verdict reflects literature available up to the search date and may change as new research appears. Nothing here is medical advice.