CHAMGAP
APPROVEDReviewed and approved by the Chamgap Editorial Team (2026-08-05). The draft was written by AI, the existence of all 2 cited sources was verified at the original page, and the verdict passed blind grading and adversarial audit. Methodology v0.6.
Verdict No. 2263 · Search date 2026-08-05 · Methodology v0.6

Road-traffic noise exposure,
does it really help with Increased ischemic heart disease and stroke?

30-Second Summary
C
Evidence Grade C · 54 · Safety caution
Traffic noise has small associations with myocardial infarction and stroke, but a pollution-independent causal effect is uncertain
Chronic high traffic noise can disturb sleep and cause stress and is associated with cardiovascular events. Bedroom sound insulation or locating sleep spaces on a quiet facade may reduce exposure but does not replace cardiovascular care.
What the
research shows
The grade is C. In a 2025 review using a linear range of roughly 40-80 dB Lden, pooled relative risks per 10 dB were 1.017 for ischemic heart disease, 1.029 for myocardial infarction, and 1.025 for stroke. The ischemic-heart-disease interval included the null, and the main pooled estimates preferentially used models without air-pollution adjustment, limiting attribution to noise itself.
What the
ads claim
This verdict concerns chronic road-traffic noise and cardiovascular events. White-noise machines, earplugs, and particulate-air-pollution verdicts ask different questions.
*

Useful facts when choosing a product

  • Lden combines day, evening, and night sound levels with extra evening and night penalties.
  • The main linear range was about 40-80 dB Lden and effects were reported per 10 dB.
  • Main pooled estimates preferentially used models without air-pollution adjustment.
  • Traffic noise and road air pollution share a source and are difficult to separate statistically.
Gap Measurement · Verdict 2263 · C 54
What advertising claims
What independent, higher-quality research supports
△ GAP
01

What the research actually shows

Pershagen and colleagues reviewed 20 publications covering 28 populations and more than 8.4 million people in 2025. They included longitudinal cohorts and case-control studies with modeled or measured residential road noise and excluded subjective noise ratings. Thirteen studies had high exposure-assessment risk, seven high confounding risk, and five high selection risk; only five were low risk in all four domains. Air-pollution data were available in about half, and main pooled estimates preferentially used models without air-pollution adjustment. NO2 adjustment showed no consistent direction, while PM2.5 adjustment tended to lower estimates, especially for ischemic heart disease; exact paired pooled values for the same study set could not be verified. Neither a separate review funding statement nor a comparison of funding across all component studies could be verified.

02

Why this is classified as C (54)

Millions of participants, many events, and three estimates in the same direction are strengths. The ischemic-heart-disease interval included one, while limited air-pollution adjustment, exposure-model error, and residual confounding give C with 54 points.

Counterpoint. C does not erase the myocardial-infarction and stroke signals. It means the combined claim and noise-specific causal effect remain uncertain.

Rejudgment record. Cross-check applied — Separated 2025 pooled Lden event estimates from before-and-after air-pollution estimates in an individual Danish study

Scoring profile behind this grade
EndpointHHard endpoint - actual events such as death
ReplicationR1Single confirmatory trial
IndependenceI1Mixed funding sources
Effect sizeE+Meets the clinically important threshold

The scoring table and the verdict agree (C).

Sub-claim grades by effect

This ingredient is marketed for several effects. A single overall grade blends strong and weak claims together, so each effect is graded separately here. The overall grade reflects the strongest disconfirming or core claim.

Effect (sub-claim)GradeBasis
Increased ischemic heart disease incidenceDRR 1.017, 95% CI 0.990-1.044, included the null.
Increased myocardial-infarction incidenceCRR was 1.029, 95% CI 1.011-1.048.
Increased stroke incidenceCRR was 1.025, 95% CI 1.009-1.041.

Cross-check — Codex and Claude

This verdict was drafted by Codex through literature review and source-existence checks, cross-checked through blind grading and adversarial audit, and settled by reapplying the methodology boundary rules. Cases with split grades were resolved through rejudgment.
03

Evidence Table

StudyDesignSampleFundingEndpointResultWeight
Study 1Systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of longitudinal observational studies840A separate funding statement could not be verified in the accessible article textIschemic heart disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke per 10 dB LdenRR 1.017, 0.990-1.044; 1.029, 1.011-1.048; and 1.025, 1.009-1.041Largest current synthesis, but main models were not air-pollution adjusted
Study 2Prospective cohort7,053Danish public research supportIncident myocardial infarction per 10 dB LdenIRR 1.10, 1.03-1.19, before NOx adjustment and 1.12, 1.02-1.22, after adjustmentWithin-study comparison before and after air-pollution adjustment
§

Receipt — 2 References

All 2 cited sources were verified for existence at the original page (as of 2026-08-05).

Pershagen G, Pyko A, Aasvang GM, et al. Environ Epidemiol. 2025;9:e400. PMID: 40444274. DOI: 10.1097/EE9.0000000000000400.
checked
Sorensen M, Andersen ZJ, Nordsborg RB, et al. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39283. PMID: 22723938. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039283.
checked
Draft and rewrite: Codex (AI) · Verification: Codex blind grading and adversarial audit · Final adjudication: Claude
Reviewed and approved: Chamgap Editorial Team · Approval date: 2026-08-05 · Corrections: none

Cite this verdict

Road-traffic noise exposure x ischemic heart disease and stroke Evidence Grade C card
[Chamgap] Road-traffic noise exposure x ischemic heart disease and stroke — Evidence Grade C·54. 2 cited sources checked. Source: https://chamgap.com/en/verdicts/heart/road-traffic-noise-ischemic-heart-disease-stroke/ · CC BY 4.0

CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution; do not distort grades, numbers, or verdict meaning.

!

What this document does and does not do

Chamgap is an information source. It reports what research has and has not confirmed; it does not tell readers what to take or buy. That decision belongs to readers and, when needed, medical or legal professionals. This verdict reflects literature available up to the search date and may change as new research appears. Nothing here is medical advice.