CHAMGAP
APPROVEDReviewed and approved by the Chamgap Editorial Team (2026-08-15). The draft was written by AI, the existence of all 3 cited sources was verified at the original page, and the verdict passed blind grading and adversarial audit. Methodology v0.7.
Verdict No. 2681 · Search date 2026-08-15 · Methodology v0.7

Single-dose typhoid conjugate vaccine,
does it really help with Prevention of blood-culture-confirmed typhoid over two years in children aged 9 months to 15 years in an endemic setting?

30-Second Summary
B
Evidence Grade B · 76 · Safety acceptable
A large Nepal trial found that one dose substantially reduced culture-confirmed typhoid over two years, but independent replication is absent
No major new safety signal stood out and common vaccine reactions were generally mild. A history of severe allergy to vaccine components requires review before vaccination.
What the
research shows
The grade is B with 76 points. In a Nepal trial randomizing 20,019 children, culture-confirmed typhoid over two years occurred in 13/10,005 vaccine recipients and 62/10,014 control-vaccine recipients, for 79.0% efficacy (95% CI 61.9 to 88.5). The protocol, interim, and final papers are reports of one trial, not independent replications.
What the
ads claim
The conjugate formulation and the two-year clinical efficacy are both supported in this trial. Three papers from one trial must not be marketed as three replications or transferred directly to a different manufacturer's product.
*

Useful facts when choosing a product

  • The study product contained 25 micrograms of Vi polysaccharide conjugated to tetanus toxoid in a single 0.5 mL dose.
  • The control was MenAfriVac, helping maintain participant masking.
  • All three reports map to ISRCTN43385161.
Gap Measurement · Verdict 2681 · B 76
What advertising claims
What independent, higher-quality research supports
△ GAP
01

What the research actually shows

The trial assigned 10,005 children to TCV and 10,014 to MenA control vaccine. The primary two-year outcome was 13 versus 62 cases, efficacy 79.0% (61.9 to 88.5), P<0.0001. The report states: “Participants were enrolled and randomly assigned during the vaccination visit by means of 1:1 stratified block randomisation, with random block sizes of 6–12 by means of an offline mobile application built for the purpose.” Assignment by the purpose-built offline app at the vaccination visit, using random block sizes of 6–12, prevented advance prediction. It also states: “We did a participant-masked and observer-masked individually randomised trial…” All assigned participants were included in event surveillance, the prespecified registered primary endpoint matched the published primary endpoint, and participant and observer masking was maintained. Funding came from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, with an initial investigational-vaccine donation from the manufacturer. PMID 30845329 is the protocol for the same registration and sample; PMIDs 31800986 and 34678198 are interim and final reports of that same trial.

02

Why this is classified as B (76)

A large randomized hard-outcome trial found a substantial effect, but it remains one trial with mixed funding and product support, giving B with 76 points.

Counterpoint. Local reactions and fever can occur; severe allergy history and acute illness should be reviewed with a vaccination professional.

Rejudgment record. Cross-check applied — Cross-checked the final and interim efficacy reports, protocol, and registry for trial identity, primary outcome, denominators, masking, and funding

Scoring profile behind this grade
EndpointHHard endpoint - actual events such as death
ReplicationR1Single confirmatory trial
IndependenceI1Mixed funding sources
Effect sizeE+Meets the clinically important threshold

The scoring table and the verdict agree (B).

Sub-claim grades by effect

This ingredient is marketed for several effects. A single overall grade blends strong and weak claims together, so each effect is graded separately here. The overall grade reflects the strongest disconfirming or core claim.

Effect (sub-claim)GradeBasis
Prevention of culture-confirmed typhoid over two yearsBThere were 13 versus 62 cases, for 79.0% efficacy.

Cross-check — Codex and Claude

This verdict was drafted by Codex through literature review and source-existence checks, cross-checked through blind grading and adversarial audit, and settled by reapplying the methodology boundary rules. Cases with split grades were resolved through rejudgment.
03

Evidence Table

StudyDesignSampleFundingEndpointResultWeight
Study 1Phase 3 individually randomized participant- and observer-masked active-control trial10,014Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; initial investigational-vaccine donation from the manufacturerBlood-culture-confirmed typhoid from 14 days after vaccination through two years13/10,005 versus 62/10,014; efficacy 79.0% (95% CI 61.9 to 88.5), P<0.0001Pivotal large hard-outcome single trial; multiple papers are reports of the same trial
§

Receipt — 3 References

All 3 cited sources were verified for existence at the original page (as of 2026-08-15).

Shakya M, Voysey M, Theiss-Nyland K, Colin-Jones R, Pant D, Adhikari A, Tonks S, Mujadidi YF, O'Reilly P, Mazur O, Kelly S, Liu X, Maharjan A, Dahal A, Haque N, Pradhan A, Shrestha S, Joshi M, Smith N, Hill J, Clarke J, Stockdale L, Jones E, Lubinda T, Bajracharya B, Dongol S, Karkey A, Baker S, Dougan G, Pitzer VE, Neuzil KM, Shrestha S, Basnyat B, Pollard AJ, TyVAC Nepal Team. Efficacy of typhoid conjugate vaccine in Nepal: final results of a phase 3, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9:e1561-e1568. PMID: 34678198. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00346-6. ISRCTN43385161.
checked
Shakya M, Colin-Jones R, Theiss-Nyland K, Voysey M, Pant D, Smith N, Liu X, Tonks S, Mazur O, Farooq YG, Clarke J, Hill J, Adhikari A, Dongol S, Karkey A, Bajracharya B, Kelly S, Gurung M, Baker S, Neuzil KM, Shrestha S, Basnyat B, Pollard AJ, TyVAC Nepal Study Team. Phase 3 Efficacy Analysis of a Typhoid Conjugate Vaccine Trial in Nepal. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:2209-2218. PMID: 31800986. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1905047. ISRCTN43385161.
checked
Theiss-Nyland K, Shakya M, Colin-Jones R, Voysey M, Smith N, Karkey A, Dongol S, Pant D, Farooq YG, Neuzil KM, Shrestha S, Basnyat B, Pollard AJ. Assessing the Impact of a Vi-polysaccharide Conjugate Vaccine in Preventing Typhoid Infections Among Nepalese Children: A Protocol for a Phase III, Randomized Control Trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68(Suppl 2):S67-S73. PMID: 30845329. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciy1106. ISRCTN43385161.
checked
Draft and rewrite: Codex (AI) · Verification: Codex blind grading and adversarial audit · Final adjudication: Claude
Reviewed and approved: Chamgap Editorial Team · Approval date: 2026-08-15 · Corrections: none

Cite this verdict

Single-dose typhoid conjugate vaccine x prevention of culture-confirmed typhoid over two years Evidence Grade B card
[Chamgap] Single-dose typhoid conjugate vaccine x prevention of culture-confirmed typhoid over two years — Evidence Grade B·76. 3 cited sources checked. Source: https://chamgap.com/en/verdicts/gut/typhoid-conjugate-vaccine-culture-confirmed-typhoid/ · CC BY 4.0

CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution; do not distort grades, numbers, or verdict meaning.

!

What this document does and does not do

Chamgap is an information source. It reports what research has and has not confirmed; it does not tell readers what to take or buy. That decision belongs to readers and, when needed, medical or legal professionals. This verdict reflects literature available up to the search date and may change as new research appears. Nothing here is medical advice.