CHAMGAP
APPROVEDReviewed and approved by the Chamgap Editorial Team (2026-07-23). The draft was written by AI, the existence of all 2 cited sources was verified at the original page, and the verdict passed blind grading and adversarial audit. Methodology v0.6.
Verdict No. 1394 · Search date 2026-07-23 · Methodology v0.6

Albendazole,
does it really help with Parasitological cure of intestinal soil-transmitted nematode infections including ascariasis and hookworm?

30-Second Summary
B
Evidence Grade B · 72 · Safety unknown
Albendazole is effective against Ascaris and hookworm, but single-dose cure of Trichuris is low
What the
research shows
Albendazole is rated B because it has established parasitological cure efficacy against ascariasis and hookworm. A 2017 network meta-analysis estimated single-dose cure rates of about 95.7% for Ascaris and 79.5% for hookworm, but only about 30.7% for Trichuris. Stool egg clearance is a direct cure endpoint and many randomized trials support efficacy, but large species-specific variation and poor Trichuris performance prevent an A grade.
What the
ads claim
Marketing may simplify the result to one tablet clearing every intestinal parasite, but cure varies substantially with species, regimen, and reinfection.
*

Useful facts when choosing a product

  • Albendazole is a benzimidazole anthelmintic used for selected intestinal nematodes; product-specific indications and directions take priority.
  • A 400-mg single dose is common in soil-transmitted helminth control, but species and clinical context may require repeat or alternative treatment.
  • Short courses are generally tolerated, although abdominal pain, nausea, headache, and transient liver-enzyme elevations can occur.
  • It is generally avoided in early pregnancy, and prolonged high-dose treatment requires liver and rare bone-marrow toxicity monitoring.
Gap Measurement · Verdict 1394 · B 72
What advertising claims
What independent, higher-quality research supports
△ GAP
01

What the research actually shows

Moser, Schindler, and Keiser synthesized 55 single-dose randomized trials from 1960 through 2016. All studied medicines worked well against Ascaris, and albendazole performed best against hookworm, while every single-dose option had low Trichuris cure. A randomized trial by Steinmann and colleagues likewise found strong Ascaris efficacy but limitations against hookworm and Trichuris, with some improvement from repeated dosing.

02

Why this is classified as B (72)

Randomized evidence on parasitological cure shows about 95.7% efficacy for Ascaris and 79.5% for hookworm, but only about 30.7% for Trichuris. Species heterogeneity and a clear low-efficacy area support B with 72 points.

Counterpoint. For confirmed Ascaris or hookworm infection, evidence for direct cure is substantial; the error is assuming identical efficacy against every parasite.

Rejudgment record. New verdict — Species-specific evaluation of parasitological cure in a 55-trial network meta-analysis, recognizing high Ascaris and hookworm efficacy but low Trichuris efficacy

Sub-claim grades by effect

This ingredient is marketed for several effects. A single overall grade blends strong and weak claims together, so each effect is graded separately here. The overall grade reflects the strongest disconfirming or core claim.

Effect (sub-claim)GradeBasis
Parasitological cure of Ascaris infectionBSingle-dose albendazole cure was about 95.7%.
Parasitological cure of hookworm infectionBCure was 79.5%, the highest among comparators but not complete.
Parasitological cure of Trichuris infectionCSingle-dose cure was low at about 30.7%.

Cross-check — Codex and Claude

This verdict was drafted by Codex through literature review and source-existence checks, cross-checked through blind grading and adversarial audit, and settled by reapplying the methodology boundary rules. Cases with split grades were resolved through rejudgment.
03

Evidence Table

StudyDesignSampleFundingEndpointResultWeight
Moser W, Schindler C, Keiser J. 2017Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials55Public and academic support including the Swiss National Science FoundationSpecies-specific parasitological cure and egg-reduction ratesAlbendazole cure was about 95.7% for Ascaris, 79.5% for hookworm, and 30.7% for Trichuris.Key synthesis
Steinmann P et al. 2011Randomized comparison of single- and three-dose albendazole and mebendazole314Public and academic research supportSpecies-specific cure and egg-reduction ratesSingle-dose treatment was strong for Ascaris but limited for hookworm and Trichuris cure, with some improvement from repeated dosing.Direct confirmation of species variation
§

Receipt — 2 References

All 2 cited sources were verified for existence at the original page (as of 2026-07-23).

Moser W, Schindler C, Keiser J. Efficacy of recommended drugs against soil transmitted helminths: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2017;358:j4307. PMID: 28947636. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j4307.
checked
Steinmann P, Utzinger J, Du ZW, et al. Efficacy of single-dose and triple-dose albendazole and mebendazole against soil-transmitted helminths and Taenia spp.: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e25003. PMID: 21980373. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025003.
checked
Draft and rewrite: Codex (AI) · Verification: Codex blind grading and adversarial audit · Final adjudication: Claude
Reviewed and approved: Chamgap Editorial Team · Approval date: 2026-07-23 · Corrections: none

Cite this verdict

Albendazole x parasitological cure of intestinal soil-transmitted nematode infections Evidence Grade B card
[Chamgap] Albendazole x parasitological cure of intestinal soil-transmitted nematode infections — Evidence Grade B·72. 2 cited sources checked. Source: https://chamgap.com/en/verdicts/gut/albendazole-intestinal-soil-transmitted-nematode-parasitological-cure/ · CC BY 4.0

CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution; do not distort grades, numbers, or verdict meaning.

!

What this document does and does not do

Chamgap is an information source. It reports what research has and has not confirmed; it does not tell readers what to take or buy. That decision belongs to readers and, when needed, medical or legal professionals. This verdict reflects literature available up to the search date and may change as new research appears. Nothing here is medical advice.