CHAMGAP
APPROVEDReviewed and approved by the Chamgap Editorial Team (2026-08-18). The draft was written by AI, the existence of all 1 cited sources was verified at the original page, and the verdict passed blind grading and adversarial audit. Methodology v0.7.
Verdict No. 2762 · Search date 2026-08-18 · Methodology v0.7

Nitrous oxide,
does it really help with No increase in major cardiovascular events, but increased severe nausea and vomiting?

30-Second Summary
D
Evidence Grade D · 34 · Safety caution
Nitrous oxide did not change 30-day major complications but increased severe nausea and vomiting
Surgical-site infection was 9% in both groups, but severe nausea and vomiting occurred in 15% versus 11%, an absolute 4-point increase. Use should be individualized by an anesthesia professional with attention to patient risk and antiemetic prophylaxis.
What the
research shows
The grade is D with 34 points. ENIGMA-II randomized 7,112 patients and used a prespecified modified intention-to-treat population of 6,992 who underwent induction of general anesthesia. The primary endpoint of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, pulmonary embolism, or cardiac arrest within 30 days occurred in 283/3,483 (8.1%) versus 296/3,509 (8.4%), RR 0.96 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.12; P=.64), a null result. In contrast, the prespecified safety endpoint of severe nausea and vomiting increased significantly, 15% versus 11% (P<.0001).
What the
ads claim
It is reasonable to say that nitrous oxide did not increase major cardiovascular complications in this setting, but not that it had no adverse effects. Severe nausea and vomiting rose from 11% to 15%.
*

Useful facts when choosing a product

  • The intervention included nitrous oxide in general anesthesia; the comparator omitted it.
  • The registration is NCT00430989.
  • The article did not identify company-supplied trial gas or equipment.
Gap Measurement · Verdict 2762 · D 34
What advertising claims
What independent, higher-quality research supports
△ GAP
01

What the research actually shows

Patients, surgeons, research staff, and outcome adjudicators were masked; only the responsible anesthetist knew the gas mixture. Central allocation used an automated telephone voice-recognition service. The prespecified primary population nevertheless excluded 120 randomized patients who did not undergo induction of general anesthesia. This post-randomization exclusion was counted as one avoidable analysis limitation. The trial reached its planned 7,000 participants and was not stopped early. Funding came from NHMRC grant 436677, the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists, the Quebec and Ontario Heart and Stroke foundations, and Hong Kong's Research Grant Council. The article states, "We declare no competing interests," and does not state that a company supplied trial gases, devices, or assessment tools.

02

Why this is classified as D (34)

This was a large publicly and nonprofit-funded hard-outcome trial, but primary benefit was null and the modified intention-to-treat analysis excluded 120 patients after randomization, giving D with 34 points.

Counterpoint. Cardiovascular safety was confirmed, but the nausea-and-vomiting burden is real. D does not mean nitrous oxide should never be used; major-event rates were similar, while increased severe nausea and vomiting is separate safety information.

Rejudgment record. Cross-check applied — Cross-checked the Lancet report, design paper, and NCT00430989 for central telephone allocation, masking, the prespecified modified intention-to-treat population of 6,992, the 30-day composite, funding, and competing-interest declaration

Scoring profile behind this grade
EndpointHHard endpoint - actual events such as death
ReplicationR1Single confirmatory trial
IndependenceI2Decisive evidence is publicly or non-profit funded
Effect sizeE-Harm increased in the trials
PrecisionC0The confidence interval leaves room for benefit

The scoring table and the verdict agree (D).

Sub-claim grades by effect

This ingredient is marketed for several effects. A single overall grade blends strong and weak claims together, so each effect is graded separately here. The overall grade reflects the strongest disconfirming or core claim.

Effect (sub-claim)GradeBasis
Reduced 30-day death and major cardiovascular complicationsDThe result was null, 8.1% versus 8.4%, RR 0.96.
No increase in severe nausea and vomitingDIt increased from 11% to 15%, an absolute 4-point difference.

Cross-check — Codex and Claude

This verdict was drafted by Codex through literature review and source-existence checks, cross-checked through blind grading and adversarial audit, and settled by reapplying the methodology boundary rules. Cases with split grades were resolved through rejudgment.
03

Evidence Table

StudyDesignSampleFundingEndpointResultWeight
Study 1International multicenter randomized trial with patients, surgeons, and assessors masked3,509NHMRC 436677, ANZCA, Quebec and Ontario Heart and Stroke foundations, and Hong Kong Research Grant Council; no company supply identifiedDeath or nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, pulmonary embolism, or cardiac arrest within 30 days; prespecified safety endpoint of severe nausea and vomitingPrimary endpoint 283/3,483 (8.1%) versus 296/3,509 (8.4%), RR 0.96 (0.83 to 1.12), P=.64, a null result; severe nausea and vomiting 15% versus 11%, P<.0001, a significant increaseLarge independently funded hard-outcome trial with a null primary cardiovascular composite and a significant increase in the prespecified severe nausea-and-vomiting safety endpoint; post-randomization analysis exclusions
§

Receipt — 1 References

All 1 cited sources were verified for existence at the original page (as of 2026-08-18).

Myles PS, Leslie K, Chan MTV, et al. The safety of addition of nitrous oxide to general anaesthesia in at-risk patients having major non-cardiac surgery (ENIGMA-II): a randomised, single-blind trial. Lancet. 2014;384(9952):1446-1454. PMID: 25142708. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60893-X. NCT00430989.
checked
Draft and rewrite: Codex (AI) · Verification: Codex blind grading and adversarial audit · Final adjudication: Claude
Reviewed and approved: Chamgap Editorial Team · Approval date: 2026-08-18 · Corrections: none

Cite this verdict

Nitrous oxide x no increase in major cardiovascular events but more severe nausea and vomiting Evidence Grade D card
[Chamgap] Nitrous oxide x no increase in major cardiovascular events but more severe nausea and vomiting — Evidence Grade D·34. 1 cited sources checked. Source: https://chamgap.com/en/verdicts/general/nitrous-oxide-high-risk-noncardiac-surgery-major-complications/ · CC BY 4.0

CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution; do not distort grades, numbers, or verdict meaning.

!

What this document does and does not do

Chamgap is an information source. It reports what research has and has not confirmed; it does not tell readers what to take or buy. That decision belongs to readers and, when needed, medical or legal professionals. This verdict reflects literature available up to the search date and may change as new research appears. Nothing here is medical advice.