CHAMGAP
Verdict No. 3115 · Search date 2026-09-16 · Methodology v1.0

Vitamin C,
does it really help with Isotope-measured fractional iron absorption in nonanemic women with low iron stores?

30-Second Summary
C
Evidence Grade C · 50 · Safety caution
ChatGPT source review and self-verification · Codex technical integration
The direction of absorption change is positive; its clinical importance and exact paired magnitude remain uncertain. Do not directly generalize to men, older adults, normal stores, anemia, pregnancy/lactation, children, renal disease, iron overload or inflammatory conditions. The energy category is navigation, not an energy/fatigue claim. [S01: Methods 2.1]
Condition-specific adverse-event counts are not reported. One of 35 participants withdrew after the first visit because fasting was difficult; the condition is unknown. High-dose/long-term oral gastrointestinal and renal/oxalate concerns and iron overload are separate safety issues. Do not transfer high-dose/IV G6PD contexts directly to the 80 mg oral test. Pregnancy, lactation, children, renal disease and iron overload are outside the demonstrated scope. Study doses are not personal dosing instructions. The adult 19+ total-intake upper limit of 2,000 mg/day is not unlimited-safety assurance or a personal dose recommendation. [S01: Results 3; S13: Health Risks, Table 3; S14: foods to avoid; S15: Adverse Effects]
What the
research shows
Yes, under the verified conditions. In a crossover trial of nonanemic women with ferritin ≤30 μg/L, 80 mg pure L-ascorbic acid taken simultaneously with the same fasted iron dose produced a median fractional iron absorption of 26.7%, versus 20.6% without added vitamin C (34 participants, P<0.001). This is a short-term absorption result, not proof of better anemia treatment, less fatigue or improved health. [S01: Methods 2.1–2.5, Results 3, Figure 2A]
What the
ads claim
This result alone does not show that vitamin C treats anemia faster or removes fatigue. Its effect size cannot be transferred to juice/foods, sodium/calcium salts, multinutrient products, different iron formulations, fed conditions or intravenous administration. Orange juice alone was not a measured condition. [S01: Methods 2.3, Discussion 4]

Four separate assessment dimensions

Effect direction and sizeThe difference between the condition medians is 6.1 percentage points, and their ratio is 1.296, approximately 29.6% higher. These are descriptive comparisons of marginal medians, not the mean or median individual change or an adjusted crossover treatment estimate. The IQRs are 19.1–32.6% around the 26.7% median and 12.3–25.5% around the 20.6% median; they are not confidence intervals. A paired-effect CI, SD and SE were not verified. [S01: Results 3; CALC01]
Evidence certaintyThe selected acute absorption contrast is positive; C/50 reflects evidence on a physiological surrogate, not established clinical treatment benefit.
ApplicabilityThe direction of absorption change is positive; its clinical importance and exact paired magnitude remain uncertain. Do not directly generalize to men, older adults, normal stores, anemia, pregnancy/lactation, children, renal disease, iron overload or inflammatory conditions. The energy category is navigation, not an energy/fatigue claim. [S01: Methods 2.1]
SafetyCondition-specific adverse-event counts are not reported. One of 35 participants withdrew after the first visit because fasting was difficult; the condition is unknown. High-dose/long-term oral gastrointestinal and renal/oxalate concerns and iron overload are separate safety issues. Do not transfer high-dose/IV G6PD contexts directly to the 80 mg oral test. Pregnancy, lactation, children, renal disease and iron overload are outside the demonstrated scope. Study doses are not personal dosing instructions.

C / 50. The seven axes are B·S·R1·I2·EX·CX·B2 (claim, endpoint, replication, independence, effect, precision, bias). Isotope-derived absorption is a surrogate. Academic funding is documented, but only 1 fully verified directly comparable trial family is decisive. Medians/IQR and limited P reporting cannot yield a valid standardized effect or paired CI, supporting EX(a)/CX. The supplied rubric counts n<200 and completer per-protocol analysis as B2. I2 is the sole strength; the fixed C/1 anchor gives 50. The score is neither a treatment-success probability nor an official GRADE score. [S01; supplied rubric/calculator]

*

Useful facts when choosing a product

  • The tested vitamin C was single-ingredient food-grade L-ascorbic acid (Sigma Aldrich); manufacturing origin, lot and exact purity were not reported. [S01: Methods 2.3]
  • The iron capsule was Ferrum Hausmann 100 mg Kaps (Vifor). Naming a brand does not establish product donation or manufacturer funding; product provision was not reported. [S01: Methods 2.3, Acknowledgments]
  • The 100 mg refers to elemental iron in the capsule. Total elemental iron including the reported 3 mg label was not separately tabulated, so absolute absorbed iron in mg was not invented. [S01: Methods 2.3; S17: registry-data mirror]
  • Baseline vitamin C status, habitual diet and total vitamin C intake were not reported. This is not classified as a vitamin C deficiency-correction trial. [S01: Methods 2.1–2.5]
ID

Chamgap Semantic Classification Code

Permanent code issued

S.vitamin-c.oral-aqueous-80mg-with-ferrous-fumarate-100mg-elemental-single-fasted-dose.low-iron-stores-nonanemic-women-isotope-fractional-iron-absorption.increase.identical-iron-water-no-added-vitamin-c

Substances > Vitamin C > Oral aqueous 80 mg with 100 mg elemental iron as ferrous fumarate, single fasted dose > Isotope fractional iron absorption in nonanemic women with low stores > Increase > Identical iron and water without added vitamin C

Retains the direction of marginal medians, 26.7% versus 20.6%, without turning 6.1 percentage points into an individual paired effect or anemia-treatment benefit. The code identifies the intervention and claim; it never contains the evidence grade, score, or safety result.

Download semantic index (JSON) · Codebook v1

Exact Claim Classification

These independent facets prevent evidence from different forms, routes, populations, effects, and comparators from being mixed.

Intervention classS · Supplement or nutraceutical
Canonical ingredient or interventionVitamin C (L-ascorbic acid)
Source or part usedPurified food-grade L-ascorbic acid; manufacturing origin, lot and exact purity not reported.
Formulation or processingSingle-ingredient L-ascorbic acid in water; not sodium/calcium ascorbate, juice or a multinutrient formula.
RouteOral
Dose80 mg AA with 100 mg elemental iron as ferrous fumarate capsule plus reported 3 mg isotopic label; author-reported AA:iron molar ratio 0.24:1.
DurationOne exposure per condition; crossover days 1,3,5,22,24,26; Methods-based isotope integration 17–21 days after each dose, blood days 22/43.
PopulationNonpregnant, nonlactating women 18–45 years; ferritin ≤30 μg/L, Hb >12 g/dL, CRP <5 mg/L; BMI 18.5–26.5 kg/m², weight <70 kg; no major chronic disease.
Effect or conditionIncreased fractional absorption of an otherwise identical oral non-heme iron dose.
Primary endpointStable-isotope-derived fractional iron absorption (%), erythrocyte incorporation model with assumed 80% incorporation; not hemoglobin/ferritin recovery.
ComparatorSame participant; identical labeled ferrous fumarate capsule with 200 mL water and no added AA, simultaneous morning 07:00–09:00 after overnight fast.
Duplicate-detection keyS|vitamin-c|l-ascorbic-acid-source-unknown|single-ingredient-aqueous|oral|80mg-aa+100mg-elemental-fefum-capsule+reported-3mg-label|simultaneous-morning-overnight-fast|women18-45-ferritin<=30ugL-hb>12gdl-crp<5mgL|increased-fractional-iron-absorption|54fe-57fe-58fe-rbc-isotope-dilution-assume80pct|17-21d-integration-methods-days22-43|identical-iron-water-no-added-aa
01

What the research actually shows

The difference between the condition medians is 6.1 percentage points, and their ratio is 1.296, approximately 29.6% higher. These are descriptive comparisons of marginal medians, not the mean or median individual change or an adjusted crossover treatment estimate. The IQRs are 19.1–32.6% around the 26.7% median and 12.3–25.5% around the 20.6% median; they are not confidence intervals. A paired-effect CI, SD and SE were not verified. [S01: Results 3; CALC01] The question is locked to adding only ascorbic acid to otherwise identical non-heme iron exposure in the same participants. Erythrocyte incorporation of stable 54Fe, 57Fe and 58Fe was measured, then converted to absorption using isotope dilution and an assumed 80% incorporation fraction. Serum iron or hemoglobin changes were not substituted for fractional absorption. [S01: Methods 2.3; S16: section 7.4, pp.37–38] Eligibility was restricted to women aged 18–45 years with ferritin ≤30 μg/L, Hb >12 g/dL and CRP <5 mg/L. Of 35 enrolled, 34 completed all 6 conditions. At 07:00–09:00 after an overnight fast, participants received the same ferrous fumarate capsule (100 mg elemental iron), reported 3 mg isotopic label and 200 mL water; the test condition added 80 mg food-grade L-ascorbic acid. The author-reported molar ratio was 0.24:1. Methods specify blood sampling on days 22/43, with isotope-specific incorporation integrated 17–21 days after dosing. [S01: Methods 2.1–2.3, Results 3]

02

Why this is classified as C (50)

C / 50. The seven axes are B·S·R1·I2·EX·CX·B2 (claim, endpoint, replication, independence, effect, precision, bias). Isotope-derived absorption is a surrogate. Academic funding is documented, but only 1 fully verified directly comparable trial family is decisive. Medians/IQR and limited P reporting cannot yield a valid standardized effect or paired CI, supporting EX(a)/CX. The supplied rubric counts n<200 and completer per-protocol analysis as B2. I2 is the sole strength; the fixed C/1 anchor gives 50. The score is neither a treatment-success probability nor an official GRADE score. [S01; supplied rubric/calculator]

Counterpoint. Absence of registration is not asserted. The printed NCT04074707 link appears to concern pregnancy, but a registry-data mirror identified NCT05414474 with matching 6 conditions, investigators and enrollment. Official history was inaccessible, and discrepancies in recruitment year, blood sampling day and registry versus report eligibility remain unresolved. Condition-specific adverse-event counts were not reported. [S01: Methods 2.1–2.5, Figure 1, Results 3; S04; S17]

Rejudgment record. Supplied calculator C agrees with assigned C; fixed score anchor agrees. — Supplied rubric and grade calculator used unmodified.

Stored scoring profile
EndpointSSurrogate marker - laboratory or imaging measures
Case application: S: isotope-derived FIA is a physiologic surrogate, not anemia correction or a patient-important event.
ReplicationR1Single confirmatory trial
Case application: R1: one fully verified directly comparable controlled trial family. Other populations, meals, non-coadministered isotope tests and balance studies fail comparability or remain incompletely verified. R1 is not a claim that only one human study exists; prospective confirmatory hierarchy is unverified.
IndependenceI2Decisive evidence is publicly or non-profit funded
Case application: I2: S01 explicitly acknowledges funding from the Laboratory of Human Nutrition, ETH Zurich; authors declare no competing financial interests. Product provision is not reported; brand names are not funding evidence.
Effect sizeEXThe clinical size of the effect could not be judged
Case application: EX(a): no verified clinical anchor, then no valid standardized effect can be reconstructed from marginal medians/IQR and only P<.001. Current paired variance, model contrast SE/CI and exact test statistic are unavailable. The borrowed power SD is not usable. This is not a finding of no absorption effect.
PrecisionCXNo pooled confidence interval could be confirmed
Case application: CX: no verified paired/model contrast confidence interval. IQR is not a CI; significant P does not provide precision of clinically relevant benefit.

Stored derived and displayed grades match; this is not a current recalculation or validity check (C).

Review performed and remaining limitations

Original publisher HTML, official bibliographic and safety sources inspected. Supplement and official registry history were inaccessible; matching registry mirror linkage remains an inference.

Absence of registration is not asserted. The printed NCT04074707 link appears to concern pregnancy, but a registry-data mirror identified NCT05414474 with matching 6 conditions, investigators and enrollment. Official history was inaccessible, and discrepancies in recruitment year, blood sampling day and registry versus report eligibility remain unresolved. Condition-specific adverse-event counts were not reported. [S01: Methods 2.1–2.5, Figure 1, Results 3; S04; S17]

Preliminary RoB 2-informed review — not a complete formal assessment
RandomizationComputer-generated crossover order; concealment and laboratory masking not reported.
Deviations from assigned interventionsOpen label, supervised dosing, per-protocol analysis. Registry-mirror/paper criteria differences retained.
Missing outcome data1 of 35 withdrew; 34 analyzed. CRP imputation is not FIA imputation.
Outcome measurementObjective stable-isotope method with 80% erythrocyte incorporation assumption.
Selection of the reported resultProspective outcome hierarchy unverified; multiple comparisons uncorrected. Outcome switching not proven.
Reasons for the certainty judgment — not formal GRADE
Risk of biasB2 for two supplied-rubric defects.
InconsistencyNo second fully verified same-contract result; inconsistency not established.
IndirectnessRestricted to younger nonanemic women, low stores and fasted high-dose iron.
ImprecisionPaired/adjusted contrast CI unverified: CX.
Publication biasNot statistically assessable with one decisive family; absence not guaranteed.

Search scope and limitations. 2026-09-16; 59 general web queries and one failed native PubMed query. Direct openings and failures logged separately. No exhaustive-search assurance.

03

Evidence Table

StudyDesignSampleFundingEndpointResultWeight
von Siebenthal et al. 2023Randomized open-label crossover; one page comparison selected from six within-person conditions35 enrolled, 34 analyzed; 204 observations are not 204 participantsLaboratory of Human Nutrition, ETH Zurich; no competing financial interests declared; product provision not reportedFIA (%), modeled from label-specific incorporation 17–21 days after doseThe difference between the condition medians is 6.1 percentage points, and their ratio is 1.296, approximately 29.6% higher. These are descriptive comparisons of marginal medians, not the mean or median individual change or an adjusted crossover treatment estimate. The IQRs are 19.1–32.6% around the 26.7% median and 12.3–25.5% around the 20.6% median; they are not confidence intervals. A paired-effect CI, SD and SE were not verified. [S01: Results 3; CALC01]Only fully verified directly comparable family; decisive evidence
§

Receipt — 22 References

Evidence access cutoff: 2026-09-16. Each citation states its actual access level (full-text transcription, abstract, index, or other) and remaining limitations. Bibliographic checking does not certify the study results or treatment efficacy.

von Siebenthal HK et al. Effect of dietary factors and time of day on iron absorption from oral iron supplements in iron deficient women. Am J Hematol. 2023;98(9):1356–1363.
See sources.json for access level, precise location and uncertainty. Access status: confirmed
checked
PubMed bibliographic record for von Siebenthal et al. 2023
See sources.json for access level, precise location and uncertainty. Access status: confirmed
checked
S01 supporting information: ajh26987-sup-0001-Supinfo.docx
See sources.json for access level, precise location and uncertainty. Access status: inaccessible
checked
NCT04074707: Defining a Dosing Regimen With Maximal Absorption for Oral Iron Supplementation During Pregnancy
See sources.json for access level, precise location and uncertainty. Access status: conflicting
checked
Hunt JR, Gallagher SK, Johnson LK. Effect of ascorbic acid on apparent iron absorption by women with low iron stores. AJCN. 1994;59:1381–1385.
See sources.json for access level, precise location and uncertainty. Access status: confirmed
checked
Hunt JR et al. Ascorbic acid: effect on ongoing iron absorption and status in iron-depleted young women. AJCN. 1990;51:649–655.
See sources.json for access level, precise location and uncertainty. Access status: confirmed
checked
Cook JD, Reddy MB. Effect of ascorbic acid intake on nonheme-iron absorption from a complete diet. AJCN. 2001;73:93–98.
See sources.json for access level, precise location and uncertainty. Access status: confirmed
checked
Thankachan P et al. Iron absorption in young Indian women: the interaction of iron status with the influence of tea and ascorbic acid. AJCN. 2008;87:881–886.
See sources.json for access level, precise location and uncertainty. Access status: confirmed
checked
Cepeda-Lopez AC et al. In overweight and obese women, dietary iron absorption is reduced and the enhancement of iron absorption by ascorbic acid is one-half that in normal-weight women. AJCN. 2015;102:1389–1397.
See sources.json for access level, precise location and uncertainty. Access status: confirmed
checked
Fidler MC et al. Iron absorption from ferrous fumarate in adult women is influenced by ascorbic acid but not by Na2EDTA. Br J Nutr. 2003.
See sources.json for access level, precise location and uncertainty. Access status: confirmed
checked
Cercamondi CI et al. Iron bioavailability from a lipid-based complementary food fortificant mixed with millet porridge can be optimized by adding phytase and ascorbic acid but not by using a mixture of ferrous sulfate and sodium iron EDTA. J Nutr. 2013;143:1233–1239.
See sources.json for access level, precise location and uncertainty. Access status: inaccessible
checked
John et al. Daily oral iron supplementation produced greater improvements in hematological parameters than alternate day doses – A pilot double-blind randomized control trial in iron-deficient young women. Clin Nutr. 2026;56:106520.
See sources.json for access level, precise location and uncertainty. Access status: confirmed
checked
NIH Office of Dietary Supplements: Vitamin C, Health Professional Fact Sheet
See sources.json for access level, precise location and uncertainty. Access status: confirmed
checked
NIDDK: Eating, Diet, & Nutrition for Hemochromatosis
See sources.json for access level, precise location and uncertainty. Access status: confirmed
checked
National Cancer Institute: Intravenous Vitamin C (PDQ), Health Professional Version
See sources.json for access level, precise location and uncertainty. Access status: confirmed
checked
IAEA. Assessment of Iron Bioavailability in Humans Using Stable Iron Isotope Techniques. Human Health Series 21. Vienna, 2012. STI/PUB/1544.
See sources.json for access level, precise location and uncertainty. Access status: confirmed
checked
NCT05414474: Effects of Enhancers and Inhibitors on Absorption From Iron Supplements (IDEA)
See sources.json for access level, precise location and uncertainty. Access status: partially_verified
checked
NCT06822062: Effect of Chitin and Ascorbic Acid on Dietary Insect Iron Absorption (INSECTE)
See sources.json for access level, precise location and uncertainty. Access status: partially_verified
checked
Does consuming ascorbate-rich fruits and fruit juices with meals improve iron bioavailability? 2026 review discovery
See sources.json for access level, precise location and uncertainty. Access status: partially_verified
checked
Iron Absorption from a Dietary Supplement, FeHydroA registry lead
See sources.json for access level, precise location and uncertainty. Access status: unresolved
checked
Effects of reducing chronic inflammation in overweight women on serum hepcidin and iron absorption with and without supplemental ascorbic acid. Br J Nutr. 2020 online.
See sources.json for access level, precise location and uncertainty. Access status: partially_verified
checked
Supplied completed verdict 907: vitamin C plus oral iron and additional hemoglobin recovery
See sources.json for access level, precise location and uncertainty. Access status: confirmed
checked
Restricted to isotope-derived fractional iron absorption after adding 80 mg L-ascorbic acid to a single fasted oral iron exposure in nonanemic women with low stores; Codex performs only identifier, format, build and deployment checks.
Technical integration by: Codex · Evidence date: 2026-09-16 · Corrections: 6

Correction log — 6

Corrections applied to this verdict, in chronological order. Changes are logged, not erased.

  • 2026-09-16 · Boundary correction — Did not label 907 a duplicate merely because vitamin C and oral route match.
  • 2026-09-16 · Estimand guard — Kept 6.1 percentage points descriptive; did not invent paired CI from IQR.
  • 2026-09-16 · Registration linkage correction — Separated the pregnancy link from probable matching NCT05414474 mirror; no assertion of absent registration.
  • 2026-09-16 · Conflicting source values retained — Retained recruitment-year, blood-day, eligibility, coffee-P and reference-median discrepancies.
  • 2026-09-16 · Unmeasured extrapolation removed — Did not create orange-juice-alone, absolute absorbed-mg, optimal-dose or clinical-health results.
  • 2026-09-16 · Supporting-file URL corrected — Used the actual publisher download link verified by final click; retained the 403 failure. No numeric or grading change. (grade C unchanged)

Cite this verdict

Does taking vitamin C with iron increase iron absorption when iron stores are low? Evidence Grade C card
[Chamgap] Does taking vitamin C with iron increase iron absorption when iron stores are low? — Evidence Grade C·50. 22 cited sources checked. Source: https://chamgap.com/en/verdicts/energy/oral-vitamin-c-low-iron-stores-fractional-iron-absorption/ · CC BY 4.0

CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution; do not distort grades, numbers, or verdict meaning.

!

What this document does and does not do

Chamgap is an information source. It reports what research has and has not confirmed; it does not tell readers what to take or buy. That decision belongs to readers and, when needed, medical or legal professionals. This verdict reflects literature available up to the search date and may change as new research appears. Nothing here is medical advice.