CHAMGAP
Verdict No. 3109 · Search date 2026-09-15 · Methodology v1.0

Folic acid,
does it really help with Reduction of BDI-II depression severity as an antidepressant adjunct?

30-Second Summary
D
Evidence Grade D · 30 · Safety caution
ChatGPT source review and self-verification · Codex technical integration
Human evidence is insufficient or was not confirmed in key trials.
Folic acid can improve hematological signs of B12 deficiency while delaying recognition of neurological problems. Antiepileptic/methotrexate contexts and long-term, high-dose, pregnancy, lactation, pediatric, severe hepatic/renal disease and cancer-history settings have separate evidence limits. The reused official product safety source does not establish the FolATED product identity or a depression indication. This page is not an individual dosing, antidepressant-change or discontinuation instruction.
What the
research shows
Adding folic acid 5 mg/day for 12 weeks to common antidepressant care in FolATED did not demonstrate improvement in the time-weighted mean BDI-II over 0–25 weeks. Adjusted difference +1.09 points (95% CI −0.48 to 2.66; P=0.173). D/30 represents failure to demonstrate improvement in this narrow comparison, not an exact zero effect.
What the
ads claim
Folic acid, L-methylfolate, B-vitamin combinations and biochemical folate increases cannot be substituted for one another or for improvement in depression symptoms.

Four separate assessment dimensions

Effect direction and sizeIn the FolATED modified-ITT primary analysis of 440 participants, the adjusted folic-acid-minus-placebo difference was +1.09 BDI-II points (95% CI −0.48 to 2.66; P=0.173). Added improvement was not demonstrated on a lower-is-better scale, but neither exact zero effect nor equivalence was established.
Evidence certaintyThe confirmed axes are B / P / R1 / I2 / E0 / B1 / C0. The decisive direct evidence is one trial family and verified public funding is a strength, but 35 of 475 randomized participants with no follow-up BDI-II were excluded from the primary analysis, and an applicable AUC MCID was not verified.
ApplicabilityThe claim is limited to antidepressant adjunct treatment in adults with clinician-diagnosed moderate-to-severe unipolar MDD. Pregnancy and planned pregnancy were excluded, lactation status was not explicitly verified, and results are not generalized to other doses, durations, scales, populations or L-methylfolate.
SafetyAdverse events, serious adverse events and MINI suicide-risk categories are reported separately from efficacy. The page retains the potential masking of B12 deficiency and antiepileptic/methotrexate contexts. The study dose is not an individual dosing or antidepressant-change instruction.

E0 means improvement was not demonstrated for the fixed comparison. Verified independent public funding supplies 1 strength, yielding the rubric's fixed D-band anchor of 30. F was not assigned because this is not repeated refutation and no validated clinical-importance threshold for the AUC mean was available.

*

Useful facts when choosing a product

  • The trial used folic acid 5 mg tablets overencapsulated in opaque hard gelatin with lactose BP filler and a visually matched placebo. The exact salt, manufacturing source, base-tablet manufacturer, lot and purity remain unverified.
  • Study treatment was taken once daily for 12 weeks, with follow-up through 25 weeks after randomization. Both arms shared an optimized-antidepressant and usual-care policy, but not necessarily an identical drug and dose for every participant.
  • The page's primary endpoint is the final-analysis-plan 0-to-25-week time-weighted mean BDI-II. The single 25-week endpoint, other doses, durations and scales, and L-methylfolate results remain separate.
ID

Chamgap Semantic Classification Code

Permanent code issued

M.folic-acid.oral-5mg-once-daily-12weeks.major-depressive-disorder-bdi-ii-auc-0to25weeks.decrease.matched-placebo-optimized-antidepressant-care

Medicinal interventions > Folic acid as the sole added active ingredient > Oral 5 mg once daily for 12 weeks > 0-to-25-week time-weighted mean BDI-II in major depressive disorder > Decrease > Matched placebo under the same optimized antidepressant care

Scope is fixed to the FolATED modified-ITT primary analysis. The single 25-week endpoint, other doses, scales and durations, and L-methylfolate results remain separate. The code identifies the intervention and claim; it never contains the evidence grade, score, or safety result.

Download semantic index (JSON) · Codebook v1

Exact Claim Classification

These independent facets prevent evidence from different forms, routes, populations, effects, and comparators from being mixed.

Intervention classM · Medicine
Canonical ingredient or interventionFolic acid: sole randomized additional active ingredient
Source or part usedManufacturing source unverified; distinct from dietary folate, L-methylfolate and folinic acid
Formulation or processing5 mg folic acid tablet overencapsulated in opaque hard gelatin, with lactose BP filler; salt, original tablet manufacturer, lot and purity unverified
RouteOral
DoseFolic acid 5 mg once daily; common optimized antidepressant treatment
Duration12 weeks of trial treatment; follow-up through25weeks from randomization
PopulationAdults with clinician-diagnosed moderate-to-severe unipolar MDD; screened for folate/B12 deficiency; pregnancy/planned pregnancy excluded. Page use restricted to nonlactating adults, but trial lactation status unverified
Effect or conditionReduction of depressive symptom severity as an antidepressant adjunct
Primary endpointBDI-II total-score time-weighted AUC average over0–25weeks: baseline/stratification-adjusted between-group difference; lower is better
ComparatorMatching lactose placebo on the same antidepressant optimization policy and usual care; individual antidepressants and doses were not identical in all participants
Duplicate-detection keyfolic-acid|oral-overencapsulated-tablet|5mg-once-daily-12weeks|adult-clinician-unipolar-mdd|screened-folate-b12|optimized-antidepressant-background|bdi-ii-auc-mean-0to25weeks|matched-lactose-placebo
01

What the research actually shows

The page primary outcome is the time-weighted BDI-II AUC average in the final analysis plan. The area between baseline and weeks 4, 12 and 25 is divided by the actual observation period; units are BDI-II points, not point-weeks or a simple baseline change. It is separated from the initial single-visit effect at week 25. The final report describes a plan before unblinding, but the exact amendment approval date and complete registry history remain unverified. The original plan and correction are disclosed rather than portrayed as an unchanged initial estimand.

02

Why this is classified as D (30)

The original-rule 7 axes are B / P / R1 / I2 / E0 / B1 / C0. E0 means improvement was not demonstrated in this fixed comparison, not an effect of exactly 0. Verified public funding I2 supplies 1 strength, giving the fixed D-band anchor of 30 points. There is no RX repeated-refutation classification or verified clinical-importance threshold for the AUC mean, so F was not assigned. The original 3-point power target was not treated as a minimum clinically important difference.

Counterpoint. FolATED's time-weighted SF-12 mental component mean favored placebo: folic acid minus placebo −1.97 points (95% CI −3.49 to −0.44; P=0.012). This is a nominal secondary-scale comparison, not BDI-II worsening or established clinical harm. Small low-folate, genotype and sex subgroups, response/remission and biochemical findings do not replace the overall primary outcome.

Stored scoring profile
EndpointPSymptom or function itself is the target - including patient reports and performance tests
ReplicationR1Single confirmatory trial
IndependenceI2Decisive evidence is publicly or non-profit funded
Effect sizeE0Null
PrecisionC0The confidence interval leaves room for benefit

Review performed and remaining limitations

The evidence cutoff is 2026-09-15. Review was single-assistant self-review, not independent external clinical review, journal certification or a guarantee of exhaustive retrieval. New evidence, corrections, retractions or numerical/classification errors trigger versioned updates at the same ID and URL.

Lactation status, salt, base-tablet manufacturer, lot and purity, complete registration history and AUC-change approval date, an applicable AUC MCID and complete individual concomitant-treatment histories remain unverified. The Table 13 SE mismatch and unadjusted AUC sign conflict are preserved.

03

Evidence Table

StudyDesignSampleFundingEndpointResultWeight
FolATED primary trialMulticenter individually randomized matched-placebo parallel trial under a common optimized-antidepressant policy475 valid randomized participants (237 versus 238); modified ITT 440 (223 versus 217)Public NIHR HTA funding; author advisory/shareholder relationship and product supply disclosed separatelyAdjusted between-group difference in the 0-to-25-week time-weighted mean BDI-II total scoreFolic acid minus placebo was +1.09 points (95% CI −0.48 to 2.66; P=0.173). Added improvement was not demonstrated on a lower-is-better scale; this is not proof of zero effect or equivalence.One decisive directly applicable trial family
Coppen and Bailey 2000Randomized matched-placebo trial under common fluoxetine 20 mg/day127 total; exact female-subgroup denominator unverifiedFunding not verified in the accessed abstract10-week HDRS-17 total and response; female subgroupFemale-subgroup endpoint HDRS-17 was 6.8 (SD 4.1) versus 11.7 (SD 6.7), P<0.001. Different dose, scale and duration prevent counting it as replication of the fixed estimand.Positive adjacent evidence; not direct replication
Resler et al. 2008 candidateCandidate human folic-acid-plus-fluoxetine trial; full results were inaccessibleExact denominator unverifiedUnverifiedExact regimen, denominator and effect estimate unverifiedRetained only as a metadata candidate and not counted toward replication or scoring.Evidence-map candidate
Sepehrmanesh et al. trialRandomized double-blind trial under common citalopram 20 mg/day; uncorrected author proof45 versus 45Reported grant 92003; final-version verification limited8-week BDI-II endpoint with folic acid 2.5 mg/dayEndpoint BDI-II was 13.31 (SD 6.57) versus 19.11 (SD 8.59), P<0.001. Its different dose and duration make it nonreplicating for the FolATED primary estimand.Positive adjacent evidence; not direct replication
Karbasi Amel and Haghshenas 2025Fluoxetine adjunct trial in participants younger than 18 yearsNot included in the adult-MDD page denominatorNot used to determine funding of the direct trial for this pagePediatric and adolescent depressive symptomsExcluded because the population falls outside the fixed boundary.Population-exclusion evidence
§

Receipt — 19 References

Evidence access cutoff: 2026-09-15. Each citation states its actual access level (full-text transcription, abstract, index, or other) and remaining limitations. Bibliographic checking does not certify the study results or treatment efficacy.

Reference 1
checked
Reference 2
checked
Reference 3
checked
Reference 4
checked
Reference 5
checked
Reference 6
checked
Reference 7
checked
Reference 8
checked
Reference 9
checked
Reference 10
checked
Reference 11
checked
Reference 12
checked
Reference 13
checked
Reference 14
checked
Reference 15
checked
Reference 16
checked
Reference 17
checked
Reference 18
checked
Reference 19
checked
Published as a current value with uncertainty disclosed; Codex performs only identifier, format, build, and deployment checks.
Technical integration by: Codex · Evidence date: 2026-09-15 · Corrections: none

Cite this verdict

Does added folic acid 5 mg lower the 25-week time-weighted mean BDI-II in MDD? Evidence Grade D card
[Chamgap] Does added folic acid 5 mg lower the 25-week time-weighted mean BDI-II in MDD? — Evidence Grade D·30. 19 cited sources checked. Source: https://chamgap.com/en/verdicts/mood/folic-acid-adjunct-major-depressive-disorder-bdi-ii-auc/ · CC BY 4.0

CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution; do not distort grades, numbers, or verdict meaning.

!

What this document does and does not do

Chamgap is an information source. It reports what research has and has not confirmed; it does not tell readers what to take or buy. That decision belongs to readers and, when needed, medical or legal professionals. This verdict reflects literature available up to the search date and may change as new research appears. Nothing here is medical advice.