CHAMGAP
VERIFIEDPassed the Codex final verification and publication gate. Evidence-verification cutoff: 2026-08-26. AI was used for research and drafting; the existence of all 1 cited sources was verified at the original page, followed by blind grading, adversarial audit, and build validation. Methodology v0.8.
Verdict No. 2900 · Search date 2026-08-26 · Methodology v0.8

Robot-assisted radical cystectomy,
does it really help with Noninferior two-year progression-free survival in bladder cancer?

30-Second Summary
B
Evidence Grade B · 76 · Safety caution
Two-year PFS was noninferior, but superiority and cost savings were not established
Radical cystectomy carries major urinary diversion, infection, ileus, bleeding, and functional risks; surgeon and center experience matter.
What the
research shows
Grade B, 76 points. In 302 per-protocol patients, two-year PFS was 72.3% versus 71.6%, absolute difference 0.7 points (95% CI -9.6 to 10.9). The lower limit exceeded the prespecified -15-point margin. Superiority and cost savings were not established.
What the
ads claim
Noninferiority is not superiority or cost-effectiveness. Robotic surgery is common in Korea, but patient costs vary substantially.
*

Useful facts when choosing a product

  • All urinary diversions in RAZOR were extracorporeal.
  • Korean out-of-pocket robotic surgery costs vary by institution and coverage.
Gap Measurement · Verdict 2900 · B 76
What advertising claims
What independent, higher-quality research supports
△ GAP
01

What the research actually shows

Four-gate review: ① Noninferiority design ② listed item ③ margin -15 points; difference 0.7 (95% CI -9.6 to 10.9) crossed it ④ avoidable through a superiority design, so counted. ① Completer analysis ② listed item ③ prespecified PP included 302 operated protocol-adherent patients, with mITT for consistency ④ conservative standard PP analysis for noninferiority, so not separately counted. ① At least 15% attrition ② listed item ③ 48/350=13.7% excluded ④ below threshold. ① Unmasked subjective endpoint ② listed item ③ open surgery but radiographic/pathologic progression and death, with pathologists masked ④ objective endpoint, criterion not met.

02

Why this is classified as B (76)

This 350-person large hard-outcome publicly funded RCT gives B, 76. Bias remains B1 for the single noninferiority-design defect.

Counterpoint. Consider the 13.7% PP exclusion and costs.

Rejudgment record. Source checked — Prespecified PP analysis crossed the -15-point noninferiority margin

Scoring profile behind this grade
EndpointHHard endpoint - actual events such as death
ReplicationR1Single confirmatory trial
IndependenceI2Decisive evidence is publicly or non-profit funded
Effect sizeE+Meets the clinically important threshold

The scoring table and the verdict agree (B).

Sub-claim grades by effect

This ingredient is marketed for several effects. A single overall grade blends strong and weak claims together, so each effect is graded separately here. The overall grade reflects the strongest disconfirming or core claim.

Effect (sub-claim)GradeBasis
Noninferior two-year PFSBExceeded the -15-point margin.
Superiority over open surgery?Not established.

Cross-check — AI research and Codex final gate

AI was used for research and drafting. Blind grading, adversarial audit, and the methodology boundary rules were then reapplied before Codex performed the final evidence, grade, copy, and build checks. If a grade cannot be narrowed, both evidence positions and their reasons are published.
03

Evidence Table

StudyDesignSampleFundingEndpointResultWeight
Study 1Open-label multicenter randomized phase 3 noninferiority trial302US National Cancer InstituteTwo-year progression-free survival72.3% vs 71.6%; difference 0.7 points (95% CI -9.6 to 10.9); margin -15 pointsDirect cancer-outcome noninferiority RCT
§

Receipt — 1 References

All 1 cited sources were verified for existence at the original page (as of 2026-08-26).

Parekh DJ, et al. Lancet. 2018. PMID: 29976469.
checked
Research and draft: AI used · Cross-check: blind grading and adversarial audit
Final verification and publication gate: Codex · Verification cutoff: 2026-08-26 · Corrections: none

Cite this verdict

Benefit of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy for Noninferior 2-Year Progression-Free Survival in Bladder Cancer Evidence Grade B card
[Chamgap] Benefit of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy for Noninferior 2-Year Progression-Free Survival in Bladder Cancer — Evidence Grade B·76. 1 cited sources checked. Source: https://chamgap.com/en/verdicts/mens/robot-assisted-radical-cystectomy-noninferior-pfs/ · CC BY 4.0

CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution; do not distort grades, numbers, or verdict meaning.

!

What this document does and does not do

Chamgap is an information source. It reports what research has and has not confirmed; it does not tell readers what to take or buy. That decision belongs to readers and, when needed, medical or legal professionals. This verdict reflects literature available up to the search date and may change as new research appears. Nothing here is medical advice.