CHAMGAP
Verdict No. 3110 · Search date 2026-09-16 · Methodology v1.0

Folic acid,
does it really help with Increase in source-defined category-a progressive motility in male-factor infertility?

30-Second Summary
D
Evidence Grade D · 30 · Safety caution
ChatGPT source review and self-verification · Codex technical integration
Human evidence is insufficient or was not confirmed in key trials.
FOLFIV planned M3 adherence and tolerability questionnaires, but exact adverse-event, serious-event and toxicity-withdrawal counts and denominators were not obtained. Non-reporting does not establish 0 events or long-term safety. Reused official folic-acid information separately supports caution about masking hematologic signs of B12 deficiency and delaying recognition of neurological injury, and interactions involving anticonvulsants or methotrexate. Evidence for long-term high doses, severe liver/kidney disease, cancer history, pregnancy, lactation and children is limited. Zinc-related harms from combination products are not assigned to folic acid. Study doses are not personal dosing, infertility-treatment or ART-change instructions.
What the
research shows
The direct placebo-controlled trial did not demonstrate improvement in the source category-a change at 3 months. D/30 is the current judgment for this narrow comparison, not proof of no effect for all folic-acid doses, aggregate WHO PR, pregnancy or live birth.
What the
ads claim
Sperm motility, pregnancy, live birth and DNA outcomes are not interchangeable. Folic acid plus zinc is not folic acid alone.

Four separate assessment dimensions

Effect direction and sizeIn FOLFIV, source-defined category-a motility change was +0.6 (SD 7.5) percentage points with folic acid and +0.8 (SD 6.9) with placebo; between-arm P=0.7871. Improvement was not demonstrated, but zero effect or equivalence was not established.
Evidence certaintyThe axes are B / S / R1 / I2 / E0 / B1 / CX. Direct evidence is one trial at the exact boundary and public funding is a strength, while endpoint-specific attrition and an unverified between-arm CI and MCID remain.
ApplicabilityThe claim is limited to folic acid 15 mg/day for 3 months in male partners aged 18–60 with at least one abnormal semen parameter and planned IVF-ICSI. Category a is not generalized to modern aggregate WHO PR, other doses, genotypes, semen measures, pregnancy or live birth.
SafetyExact FOLFIV adverse-event counts and denominators remain unverified. Potential masking of B12 deficiency, antiepileptic/methotrexate interactions, long-term high-dose exposure and special-population limits are disclosed separately from efficacy.

E0 means improvement was not demonstrated for the narrow comparison. One I2 strength gives the fixed D-band anchor of 30; F was not assigned because repeated refutation and exclusion of benefit were not established.

*

Useful facts when choosing a product

  • The intervention was three folic-acid 5 mg tablets, totaling 15 mg/day, versus three daily placebo tablets matched in appearance, size, taste and weight. Bailly-Creat Laboratory manufacture was identified, but the exact salt, crystal form, release, batch, purity and placebo excipients remain unverified.
  • The semen endpoint was at 3 months, while treatment could continue until IVF semen collection, so pregnancy follow-up is not equated with the semen visit. Adherence collection was planned, but actual ingestion rates and total dietary folate exposure remain unverified.
  • The source separates Progressive motility (a) from Total motility (a+b+c). Category a is not automatically converted to modern aggregate WHO PR or historical a+b.
ID

Chamgap Semantic Classification Code

Permanent code issued

M.folic-acid.oral-15mg-daily-3months.ivf-icsi-male-factor-infertility-category-a-progressive-motility.increase.matched-placebo

Medicinal interventions > Folic acid monotherapy > Oral 15 mg/day for 3 months > Source-defined category-a progressive motility in male-factor infertility planning IVF-ICSI > Increase > Matched placebo

Fixed to the FOLFIV source-defined category-a change and kept separate from modern aggregate WHO PR, total motility, pregnancy and live birth. The code identifies the intervention and claim; it never contains the evidence grade, score, or safety result.

Download semantic index (JSON) · Codebook v1

Exact Claim Classification

These independent facets prevent evidence from different forms, routes, populations, effects, and comparators from being mixed.

Intervention classM · Medicine
Canonical ingredient or interventionFolic acid as the sole randomized additional active ingredient
Source or part usedManufacturing source, salt and crystal form unverified; distinct from dietary folate, 5-MTHF and folinic acid
Formulation or processingThree 5-mg tablets daily; matched placebo prepared by Bailly-Creat Laboratory; release, batch and excipients unverified
RouteOral
Dose15 mg/day (three 5-mg tablets); timing and quantitative adherence unverified
DurationSemen assessment at M3 (3 months); supplementation could continue until IVF semen collection, distinct from pregnancy follow-up
PopulationMale partners aged 18–60 years in infertile couples planning IVF-ICSI; at least one abnormal semen criterion; mixed female causes present; not assumed to be confirmed folate-deficiency replacement
Effect or conditionIncrease in the source-reported progressive-motility category a
Primary endpointTable4 Progressive motility (a), between-arm M3−M0 comparison, percentage points; published secondary endpoint; modern WHO aggregate PR crosswalk unverified
ComparatorThree matched placebo tablets daily on the same IVF-ICSI care policy; no other male hormonal or vitamin intervention reported
Duplicate-detection keyfolic-acid|oral-tablet|15-mg-per-day|3-months|adult-male-factor-ivf-icsi|progressive-motility-as-reported-a|change-m3-m0|matched-placebo
01

What the research actually shows

Table4 separately reports Progressive motility (a) and Total motility (a+b+c). The methods cite WHO 2010, but the exact speed threshold for category a and its correspondence to modern aggregate WHO PR were not verified. The page therefore retains the source category a, without converting it to a+b or total motility. This was an editorial boundary decision after the literature review, not a prospectively registered review plan.

02

Why this is classified as D (30)

The original 7 axes are B / S / R1 / I2 / E0 / B1 / CX. E0 means failure to demonstrate improvement in this exact comparison. I2 public funding provides 1 strength, giving the fixed D-band score of 30. Potential selection from missing outcomes is counted once under B1. Unverified CI/clinical importance is separated under precision, and other doses/genotypes under scope and replication. This is neither RX repeated refutation nor exclusion of benefit, so F was not assigned.

Counterpoint. In the same trial, biochemical pregnancy in the embryo-transfer subset occurred in 26/59 versus 11/49 couples, with Table6 P=0.018. Clinical pregnancy at 7 weeks occurred in 21/59 versus 10/49, P=0.082, a separate outcome. Miscarriage was 5/59 versus 1/49, P=0.146, with denominators explicitly not representing all randomized couples. These findings or DNA changes do not establish motility success or improved live birth.

Stored scoring profile
EndpointSSurrogate marker - laboratory or imaging measures
ReplicationR1Single confirmatory trial
IndependenceI2Decisive evidence is publicly or non-profit funded
Effect sizeE0Null
PrecisionCXNo pooled confidence interval could be confirmed

Review performed and remaining limitations

The evidence cutoff is 2026-09-16 and review was single-assistant self-review. This is not independent external clinical review, journal certification or a guarantee of exhaustive retrieval; new evidence, corrections or errors trigger updates at the same ID and URL.

WHO category-a correspondence and speed threshold, full registry history, protocol, SAP, endpoint prespecification rank, missing-data sensitivity, between-arm CI and MCID, and product salt, batch, purity and excipients remain unverified.

03

Evidence Table

StudyDesignSampleFundingEndpointResultWeight
FOLFIV primary trialDouble-blind parallel randomized matched-placebo trial162 randomized (83 versus 79); motility-change analysis 126 (66 versus 60)French Ministry of Health PHRC 2010 public funding; AP-HP sponsorship3-month-minus-baseline change in source-defined category-a progressive motility (percentage points); article secondary endpointMean change was +0.6 (SD 7.5) versus +0.8 (SD 6.9) percentage points; between-arm Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney P=0.7871. Improvement was not demonstrated, but zero effect or equivalence was not established.One decisive directly applicable trial family
da Silva 2013Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled folic-acid 5 mg/day monotherapy trial49 protocol completers; initial randomized count unverifiedCAPES fellowships for two investigators; complete trial funding unverified3-month semen measures using a historical a+b motility definitionNo significant improvement was reported for examined semen outcomes, but this is not the exact category-a estimand.Adjacent evidence with a different dose and endpoint definition
Raigani 2014Four-arm randomized placebo-controlled trial including a folic-acid-only arm83 total; exact endpoint-specific denominator unverifiedUnverifiedExact category-a effect estimate unverified in the abstractRetained as a candidate but not counted toward direct replication or scoring.Candidate with the exact endpoint unverified
Huang 2020MTHFR-genotype-stratified randomized placebo-controlled folic-acid 0.8 mg/day monotherapy trial769 eligible; overlapping genotype strata were not summedAuthors reported no funding3-month progressive motility in the MTHFR 677 TT subgroupA positive TT-subgroup result was reported (32.36 to 40.63% versus 36.84 to 33.97%), but table-footnote and narrative test descriptions conflict, and the exact between-arm CI, P value and denominator remain unverified.Positive adjacent evidence at a different dose and genotype
Wong 2002Factorial four-arm trial with a folic-acid-only arm and separate fertile/subfertile strataExact folic-only motility-analysis denominator unverifiedPubMed reports non-US government support; details unverifiedExact category-a change estimate unverifiedRetained as a monotherapy-arm candidate but not used as quantitative direct replication.Candidate without recovered quantitative estimate
FAZSTLarge randomized trial of combined folic acid 5 mg plus zinc 30 mg/day versus placebo2,370 participantsNIH/NICHD public supportTotal motility and live birth; not folic-acid-only category-a motilityTotal-motility difference was −0.5 percentage points (95.1% CI −2.5 to 1.5). The combination and different endpoint were not used as a folic-acid-only effect or repeated refutation.Combination and different-endpoint exclusion evidence
§

Receipt — 14 References

Evidence access cutoff: 2026-09-16. Each citation states its actual access level (full-text transcription, abstract, index, or other) and remaining limitations. Bibliographic checking does not certify the study results or treatment efficacy.

Reference 1
checked
Reference 2
checked
Reference 3
checked
Reference 4
checked
Reference 5
checked
Reference 6
checked
Reference 7
checked
Reference 8
checked
Reference 9
checked
Reference 10
checked
Reference 11
checked
Reference 12
checked
Reference 13
checked
Reference 14
checked
Published as a current value with uncertainty disclosed; Codex performs only identifier, format, build and deployment checks.
Technical integration by: Codex · Evidence date: 2026-09-16 · Corrections: none

Cite this verdict

Does folic acid 15 mg/day improve category-a progressive motility in male infertility? Evidence Grade D card
[Chamgap] Does folic acid 15 mg/day improve category-a progressive motility in male infertility? — Evidence Grade D·30. 14 cited sources checked. Source: https://chamgap.com/en/verdicts/mens/folic-acid-male-infertility-category-a-progressive-motility/ · CC BY 4.0

CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution; do not distort grades, numbers, or verdict meaning.

!

What this document does and does not do

Chamgap is an information source. It reports what research has and has not confirmed; it does not tell readers what to take or buy. That decision belongs to readers and, when needed, medical or legal professionals. This verdict reflects literature available up to the search date and may change as new research appears. Nothing here is medical advice.