CHAMGAP
VERIFIEDPassed the Codex final verification and publication gate. Evidence-verification cutoff: 2026-07-21. AI was used for research and drafting; the existence of all 3 cited sources was verified at the original page, followed by blind grading, adversarial audit, and build validation. Methodology v1.0.
Verdict No. 1005 · Search date 2026-07-21 · Methodology v1.0

Human serum albumin 20% is a concentrated plasma-protein biologic manufactured from human plasma and administered intravenously by prescription.,
does it really help with The claim is that adding albumin to antibiotics in cirrhosis with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis reduces renal impairment and in-hospital mortality.?

30-Second Summary
B
Evidence Grade B · 78 · Safety caution
Albumin added to antibiotics has a large renal and mortality benefit in high-risk SBP, but evidence-volume limits support a high-B verdict.
Concentrated albumin can cause circulatory overload, pulmonary edema, or worsening heart failure, so infusion rate and volume status require monitoring. Rare hypersensitivity can occur, and donor screening and manufacturing greatly reduce but cannot theoretically eliminate pathogen-transmission risk from a plasma-derived product.
What the
research shows
In the pivotal randomized trial, albumin added to antibiotics markedly reduced renal impairment and in-hospital death versus antibiotics alone, and a meta-analysis of four randomized trials supported both outcomes. The total randomized evidence included 288 patients and the pivotal trial 126, supporting B with 78 points under the strict A criterion.
What the
ads claim
The fact that albumin raises a low laboratory value does not establish the same mortality benefit in every patient with cirrhosis or ascites. This verdict is confined to use with antibiotics for SBP.
*

Useful facts when choosing a product

  • Human albumin 20% is a concentrated plasma-derived product given intravenously in hospital with prescription and fluid-status monitoring.
  • The pivotal regimen added 1.5 g/kg at diagnosis and 1.0 g/kg on day three to antibiotic treatment.
  • AASLD guidance identifies especially clear benefit in high-risk SBP when blood urea nitrogen exceeds 30 mg/dL, creatinine exceeds 1 mg/dL, or total bilirubin exceeds 5 mg/dL.
  • Concentration, excipients, sodium content, and infusion rate can vary by product, and correction of hypoalbuminemia cannot be equated with improved clinical outcomes in SBP.
ID

Chamgap Semantic Classification Code

Candidate index · review held

M.human-serum-albumin-20-percent-is-a-concentrated-plasma-protein-biologic-manufactured-from-human-plasma-and-administered-intravenously-by-prescription.intravenous.the-claim-is-that-adding-albumin-to-antibiotics-in-cirrhosis-with-spontaneous-bacterial-peritonitis-reduces-renal-impairment-and-in-hospital-mortality.reduce.addon

Medicinal interventions > Human serum albumin 20% is a concentrated plasma-protein biologic manufactured from human plasma and administered intravenously by prescription. > Intravenous > The claim is that adding albumin to antibiotics in cirrhosis with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis reduces renal impairment and in-hospital mortality. > Reduction claim > Added intervention on common background care

An automated migration candidate, not an issued permanent code; exact claim scope remains under review. This machine-generated migration candidate helps retrieval but is not a permanent assignment. The original verdict ID and URL remain authoritative.

Download semantic index (JSON) · Codebook v1

Gap Measurement · Verdict 1005 · B 78
What advertising claims
What independent, higher-quality research supports
△ GAP
01

What the research actually shows

Antibiotics plus standard-dose albumin are strongly supported in high-risk SBP. Additional independent trials are needed in low-risk patients, for alternative dosing, and in people at high risk of fluid overload.

02

Why this is classified as B (78)

Large effects on direct mortality and renal outcomes are supported by a four-RCT meta-analysis and guidance. Sort 1999 had public, non-industry support from the Spanish Health Research Fund and Hospital Clínic, whereas the Salerno 2013 meta-analysis received an unrestricted grant from CSL Behring. With no independent large RCT and one 126-patient pivotal trial dominating 288 randomized patients overall, the result is high B with 78 points rather than A.

Counterpoint. In practice, the evidence is strong enough to support standard care for high-risk SBP. Grade B does not oppose use; it distinguishes this evidence volume and independence from the stricter A threshold.

Rejudgment record. Cross-validation incorporated — The direct renal-impairment and in-hospital mortality effects in Sort 1999, consistency across a four-RCT meta-analysis, and AASLD guidance were weighted highly. Sort had public, non-industry support from the Spanish Health Research Fund and Hospital Clínic, whereas the Salerno meta-analysis received an unrestricted CSL Behring grant. With no independent large RCT and the 126-patient pivotal trial dominating 288 randomized patients overall, the result was fixed at high B with 78 points rather than A.

▦

Sub-claim grades by effect

This ingredient is marketed for several effects. A single overall grade blends strong and weak claims together, so each effect is graded separately here. The overall grade reflects the strongest disconfirming or core claim.

Effect (sub-claim)GradeBasis
Reduced renal impairmentBThe pivotal RCT showed a reduction from 33% to 10%, and the four-RCT meta-analysis estimated OR 0.21, but the total sample was 288.
Reduced in-hospital mortalityBIn-hospital mortality fell from 29% to 10% in the pivotal RCT, reinforced by the overall mortality benefit in meta-analysis.
Reduced three-month mortalityBThree-month mortality fell from 41% to 22% in the pivotal RCT, but this finding comes from a single 126-participant trial.
✓

Cross-check — AI research and Codex final gate

AI was used for research and drafting. Blind grading, adversarial audit, and the methodology boundary rules were then reapplied before Codex performed the final evidence, grade, copy, and build checks. If a grade cannot be narrowed, both evidence positions and their reasons are published.
03

Evidence Table

StudyDesignSampleFundingEndpointResultWeight
Sort et al. randomized trial of albumin in SBPRandomized controlled trial assigning patients with cirrhosis and SBP to cefotaxime alone or cefotaxime plus intravenous albumin126 participantsSupported by the Spanish Health Research Fund and Hospital Clínic; public, non-industry fundingRenal impairment, in-hospital mortality, and three-month mortalityRenal impairment fell from 33% to 10%, in-hospital mortality from 29% to 10%, and three-month mortality from 41% to 22%.Pivotal RCT with direct hard outcomes and large effects, but a moderate sample
Salerno et al. meta-analysis of randomized trialsSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing albumin plus antibiotics in SBPFour trials with 288 participantsSupported by an unrestricted grant from CSL BehringRenal impairment and mortalityRenal impairment was 30.6% versus 8.3% with OR 0.21, and mortality 35.4% versus 16.0% with OR 0.34, without significant heterogeneity.Reinforces consistency, but total sample is small and industry-supported
AASLD 2021 guidance on ascites, SBP, and hepatorenal syndromeClinical guidance based on systematic evidence assessment for complications of cirrhosisNot applicableAmerican Association for the Study of Liver DiseasesIndication and dosing of albumin added to antibiotics in SBPFor SBP with renal dysfunction or high bilirubin risk, albumin 1.5 g/kg at diagnosis and 1.0 g/kg on day three is recommended with antibiotics.Strengthens clinical applicability but is not itself an efficacy trial
§

Receipt — 3 References

All 3 cited sources were verified for existence at the original page (as of 2026-07-21).

Sort P, Navasa M, Arroyo V, Aldeguer X, Planas R, Ruiz-del-Arbol L, Castells L, Vargas V, Soriano G, Guevara M, Ginès P, Rodés J. Effect of intravenous albumin on renal impairment and mortality in patients with cirrhosis and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(6):403-409. PMID: 10432325. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199908053410603.
checked
Salerno F, Navickis RJ, Wilkes MM. Albumin infusion improves outcomes of patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(2):123-130.e1. PMID: 23178229. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.11.007.
checked
Biggins SW, Angeli P, Garcia-Tsao G, Ginès P, Ling SC, Nadim MK, Wong F, Kim WR. Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Management of Ascites, Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis and Hepatorenal Syndrome: 2021 Practice Guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2021;74(2):1014-1048. PMID: 33942342. DOI: 10.1002/hep.31884.
checked
Research and draft: AI used · Cross-check: blind grading and adversarial audit
Final verification and publication gate: Codex · Evidence date: 2026-07-21 · Corrections: none
↗

Cite this verdict

Does human albumin reduce renal impairment and in-hospital mortality in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis? Evidence Grade B card
[Chamgap] Does human albumin reduce renal impairment and in-hospital mortality in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis? — Evidence Grade B·78. 3 cited sources checked. Source: https://chamgap.com/en/verdicts/liver/human-albumin-sbp-renal-impairment-in-hospital-mortality/ · CC BY 4.0

CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution; do not distort grades, numbers, or verdict meaning.

!

What this document does and does not do

Chamgap is an information source. It reports what research has and has not confirmed; it does not tell readers what to take or buy. That decision belongs to readers and, when needed, medical or legal professionals. This verdict reflects literature available up to the search date and may change as new research appears. Nothing here is medical advice.
↑