CHAMGAP
VERIFIEDPassed the Codex final verification and publication gate. Evidence-verification cutoff: 2026-08-04. AI was used for research and drafting; the existence of all 2 cited sources was verified at the original page, followed by blind grading, adversarial audit, and build validation. Methodology v1.0.
Verdict No. 2151 · Search date 2026-08-04 · Methodology v1.0

Black tea with an iron-containing meal,
does it really help with Reduced single-meal fractional nonheme-iron absorption?

30-Second Summary
C
Evidence Grade C · 54 · Safety acceptable
Simultaneous tea reduced one-meal absorption versus delayed tea but did not establish long-term anemia
No serious adverse-event signal emerged from an ordinary cup of tea with a meal. People receiving therapeutic iron should follow clinician instructions about timing.
What the
research shows
The grade is C. In a nonrandomized sequential study, fractional absorption was 5.7% with water, 3.6% with simultaneous tea, and 5.7% when tea followed one hour later. Simultaneous versus delayed tea differed at P=0.046, but water versus simultaneous tea did not at P=0.398. This was a single-meal absorption measure, not long-term iron deficiency or anemia, giving C with 54 points.
What the
ads claim
The evidence supports lower one-meal absorption with simultaneous versus delayed tea. It did not measure long-term ferritin, anemia, or fatigue.
*

Useful facts when choosing a product

  • The tea used one 3-g bag in 200 mL boiling water for three minutes plus 12 mL semi-skimmed milk.
  • The porridge was labeled with 4 mg of stable-isotope iron as 57FeSO4.
  • Absorption was 5.7%, 3.6%, and 5.7% in the water, simultaneous-tea, and delayed-tea conditions.
ID

Chamgap Semantic Classification Code

Candidate index · review held

F.porridge-meal-labeled-with-iron-isotope-taken-with-black-tea.oral.single-meal-fractional-nonheme-iron-absorption.reduce.UNK

Foods and beverages > porridge meal labeled with iron isotope taken with black tea > Oral > single-meal fractional nonheme-iron absorption > Reduction claim > Unknown

An automated migration candidate, not an issued permanent code; exact claim scope remains under review. This machine-generated migration candidate helps retrieval but is not a permanent assignment. The original verdict ID and URL remain authoritative.

Download semantic index (JSON) · Codebook v1

Gap Measurement · Verdict 2151 · C 54
What advertising claims
What independent, higher-quality research supports
△ GAP
01

What the research actually shows

Fuzi et al. gave 12 iron-replete, nonanemic women water, simultaneous tea, and tea one hour after the meal in a fixed sequence separated by 14 days. Both the registry and article identify a nonrandomized single-group sequential design. All completed. Absorption with tea one hour later was 5.7%, the same as with water. This was not evidence from a group at risk of iron deficiency. The University of Chester and UK Medical Research Council supported the work.

02

Why this is classified as C (54)

A human absorption difference with a paired standardized effect of about 0.65 was observed, but it rests on an acute surrogate in 12 participants with nonrandomized sequencing, giving C with 54 points.

Counterpoint. Its long-term importance in iron-deficient patients or people taking therapeutic iron remains unresolved.

Rejudgment record. Cross-check applied — A nonrandomized 12-person acute nonheme-iron absorption surrogate with a paired standardized effect of about 0.65

Stored scoring profile
EndpointSSurrogate marker - laboratory or imaging measures
ReplicationR1Single confirmatory trial
IndependenceI2Decisive evidence is publicly or non-profit funded
Effect sizeE+Meets the clinically important threshold

Stored derived and displayed grades match; this is not a current recalculation or validity check (C).

Sub-claim grades by effect

This ingredient is marketed for several effects. A single overall grade blends strong and weak claims together, so each effect is graded separately here. The overall grade reflects the strongest disconfirming or core claim.

Effect (sub-claim)GradeBasis
Simultaneous tea lowers fractional absorption versus tea one hour laterCThe result was 3.6% versus 5.7%, P=0.046.
Simultaneous tea causes long-term iron deficiency or anemia?This study did not measure long-term iron status.

Cross-check — AI research and Codex final gate

AI was used for research and drafting. Blind grading, adversarial audit, and the methodology boundary rules were then reapplied before Codex performed the final evidence, grade, copy, and build checks. If a grade cannot be narrowed, both evidence positions and their reasons are published.
03

Evidence Table

StudyDesignSampleFundingEndpointResultWeight
Fuzi et al. 2017Nonrandomized single-group sequential stable-isotope absorption study12 enrolled and 12 analyzedUniversity of Chester and UK Medical Research CouncilFractional iron absorption from erythrocyte isotope incorporation 14 days laterWater 5.7±8.5%, simultaneous tea 3.6±4.2%, delayed tea 5.7±5.4%; simultaneous versus delayed P=0.046, water versus simultaneous P=0.398Pivotal acute absorption evidence
§

Receipt — 2 References

All 2 cited sources were verified for existence at the original page (as of 2026-08-04).

Ahmad Fuzi SF, Koller D, Bruggraber S, et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;106:1413-1421. PMID: 29046302. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.117.161364.
checked
ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT02365103. Tea Consumption and Iron Bioavailability in Women Using a Stable Isotope.
checked
Research and draft: AI used · Cross-check: blind grading and adversarial audit
Final verification and publication gate: Codex · Evidence date: 2026-08-04 · Corrections: none

Cite this verdict

Black tea with an iron-containing meal x reduced nonheme-iron absorption Evidence Grade C card
[Chamgap] Black tea with an iron-containing meal x reduced nonheme-iron absorption — Evidence Grade C·54. 2 cited sources checked. Source: https://chamgap.com/en/verdicts/energy/black-tea-with-iron-meal-nonheme-iron-absorption/ · CC BY 4.0

CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution; do not distort grades, numbers, or verdict meaning.

!

What this document does and does not do

Chamgap is an information source. It reports what research has and has not confirmed; it does not tell readers what to take or buy. That decision belongs to readers and, when needed, medical or legal professionals. This verdict reflects literature available up to the search date and may change as new research appears. Nothing here is medical advice.