| 1 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N01 · Evidence conditionWhich vitamin C and blood-pressure question does this cover?Required |
The existing question concerns blood-pressure reduction in adults with hypertension or prehypertension. Directly studied adults taking antihypertensives are distinguished from supporting reports in other populations. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Oral single-ingredient vitamin C, hypertension, prehypertension, comparison, measurement and time |
Material needed: External verification and content review of the question boundary and existing account remain incomplete. No separate subquestions are recorded and no new independence is certified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 2 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N02 · Evidence conditionHow much is known about the single-ingredient formulation and source?Required |
The existing account concerns an oral single-ingredient ascorbic-acid supplement as a purified nutrient. A plant part is not applicable. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Ascorbic acid, tablets, capsules, salts, excipients and feedstock |
Material needed: Feedstock, manufacture, country and study-specific tablets, capsules, salts and excipients remain unverified. Foods, combinations and intravenous administration are not automatically included. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 3 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N03 · Evidence conditionCan 500 mg/day and other doses be read as the same effect?Required |
Existing dose records distinguish direct-trial 500 mg/day, other-study 500–2000 mg/day and acute 2 g. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Distinguishing direct 500 mg/day, other 500–2000 mg/day and acute 2 g |
Material needed: Exact report-specific products, doses, adherence and direct comparisons of an optimal dose remain unverified. Dose superiority is not calculated from numbers in different studies. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 4 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N04 · Evidence conditionHow are 6 weeks and other durations distinguished?Required |
The existing records distinguish the direct trial over 6 weeks, 1 month, crossover periods of 3 months and long-term research. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Direct 6-week research, 1 month, crossover periods of 3 months, long-term and acute exposure |
Material needed: Report-specific starts, ends, visits, exact long-term durations and complete outcome-time mappings remain unverified. The duration list is not arbitrarily assigned to each report. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 5 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N05 · Evidence conditionDo all reports directly concern hypertensive or prehypertensive adults?Required |
The direct population is hypertensive adults taking antihypertensives. Older general-population and diabetic groups are separate supporting evidence. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Diagnosis, medication, age, baseline conditions and population composition |
Material needed: Hypertensive and prehypertensive counts, diagnostic criteria and relevant subgroups in mixed reports remain unverified. Other populations' results are not converted into the same effect. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 6 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N06 · Evidence conditionAre differences by baseline vitamin C and blood pressure known?Required |
The existing account states that trials with different populations and baseline pressure were not simply combined as the same effect. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Baseline intake, circulating concentration, pressure, conditions and prespecified subgroups |
Material needed: Study-specific vitamin C deficiency, concentrations, baseline pressure and prespecified subgroup results are absent from the stored summary. No new population-specific effect is calculated. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 7 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N07 · Evidence conditionAre placebo and low-dose active control the same comparison?Required |
The existing question uses matched placebo as its main comparison, separating grape-seed combinations and low-dose active control. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Matched placebo, high-dose and low-dose active controls and direct contrasts |
Material needed: Exact placebo composition, matching of concurrent care and long-term active-control doses remain unverified. Different comparisons are not treated as identical. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 8 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N08 · Evidence conditionHow were existing antihypertensives maintained?Required |
The existing account treats maintenance of medication as an important boundary. It concerns adding a supplement to existing blood-pressure care or comparing with placebo. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Medication types, doses, changes, adherence and additional care |
Material needed: Group-specific medication, changes, withdrawals and additional care remain unverified. Supplement findings are not extended into evidence for replacing or stopping antihypertensives. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 9 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N09 · Evidence conditionWhat were the pressure units, devices and repeated measurements?Required |
Existing outcomes use mmHg, treating office SBP and DBP separately from ambulatory SBP and DBP. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
mmHg, SBP, DBP, devices, posture, repetition, averaging and timing |
Material needed: Study-specific devices, calibration, posture, measurement counts, averaging rules and visit times remain unverified. Measurement methods and results are distinguished. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 10 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N10 · Evidence conditionAre office and ambulatory pressure the same outcome?Required |
Existing records separate office and ambulatory pressure. Ward concerns 24-hour ambulatory measurement, while the older-person trial distinguishes daytime effects from office results. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Estimates and denominators for office, daytime and full ambulatory pressure |
Material needed: Measurement windows, selected analyses, exact denominators and office values remain unverified. Different measurement results are not combined into one effect. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 11 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N11 · Evidence conditionCan daytime SBP be converted into nocturnal or 24-hour benefit?Required |
The existing synthesis records that 24-hour and nocturnal benefits were not established. Fotherby's daytime value is also not converted into a full 24-hour effect. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Daytime, nocturnal and 24-hour windows and their separate results |
Material needed: Complete nocturnal and 24-hour estimates, intervals, denominators and sleep-time definitions remain unverified. A specific positive contrast is not extended to every window. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 12 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N12 · Evidence conditionDoes a positive SBP finding mean the same result for DBP?Required |
The existing account records that a specific positive SBP finding does not establish the same result for DBP, nocturnal pressure or long-term control. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Separate SBP and DBP values, denominators, intervals, tests and hierarchy |
Material needed: Ward's exact vitamin-C-alone DBP value and full DBP effects, intervals and hierarchy across reports remain unverified. SBP values do not fill these gaps. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 13 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N13 · Evidence conditionWhich contrast was used in Ward's 4-group trial?Required |
The existing design is a double-blind 4-group randomized trial. Only vitamin C alone versus placebo is used as direct blood-pressure evidence. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
The 4-group allocation, vitamin C alone, placebo, combination and prespecified contrasts |
Material needed: Group-specific allocation, products, background care, interaction plans and prespecified contrasts remain unverified. Combination and single-ingredient groups are separated. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 14 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N14 · Evidence conditionWhat is Ward's SBP value for vitamin C alone versus placebo?Required |
The existing result is vitamin C alone versus placebo SBP −1.8±0.8 mmHg, P=.03. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Direction, mmHg, P value and level of the single-ingredient contrast |
Material needed: The exact 95% CI, adjustment, effect of interest and vitamin-C-alone DBP remain unverified. The full 4-group result, pre/post changes and combination results are not converted into the isolated effect. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 15 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N15 · Evidence conditionAre Ward's 69 total participants the contrast-analysis denominator?Required |
The existing sample record is 69 total participants; vitamin-C-alone and placebo arm analysis counts remain unverified. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Distinguishing total, group assignment, analysis, measurement windows and missingness |
Material needed: Group assignment, attrition, SBP, DBP and ambulatory analysis denominators and ITT or PP remain unverified. The 69 participants are not copied into each outcome or harm denominator. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 16 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N16 · Evidence conditionWhat does Ward's ±0.8 mean?Required |
The existing result explicitly leaves the SD or SE meaning of ± and the exact 95% CI unverified. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Distinguishing SD and SE, the exact 95% CI and analysis model |
Material needed: The ± type, standard error, variance, valid denominator and original CI inputs remain unverified. No new interval, variance or sample size is calculated from ±0.8. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 17 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N17 · Evidence conditionCan the grape-seed combination's pressure increase be attributed to vitamin C alone?Required |
The paper title concerns increased pressure with vitamin C and grape-seed polyphenols combined. The existing citation account does not attribute that harm to the single ingredient. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Combination groups, isolated contrasts, the paper title and interaction |
Material needed: The combination's exact increase, denominator, interval, cause and interaction remain unverified. A 4-group title or overall result is not transferred into a vitamin-C-alone harm estimate. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 18 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N18 · Evidence conditionHow does Duffy's BP report relate to associated FMD research?Required |
Duffy is a placebo-controlled hypertension report. The existing account describes related FMD research from the same investigators and a related cohort, without counting it as independent replication. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
The original BP report, related investigators, cohort and outcome identity |
Material needed: Exact participant correspondence, overlap, inclusion and registry identity remain unverified. Related FMD or other verdict results are not imported as BP efficacy. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 19 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N19 · Evidence conditionCan the 39 participants in related FMD research serve as Duffy's BP denominator?Required |
The existing record leaves original BP trial and analysis denominators unverified while specifying 39 in the related FMD paper. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Original BP assignment and analysis denominators versus related-report counts |
Material needed: Original BP group and outcome denominators, attrition and correspondence of the 39 participants to BP results remain unverified. Related-report counts are not converted into original denominators. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 20 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N20 · Evidence conditionWhich numerical findings were held back for Duffy?Required |
The existing record preserves reported BP reduction while withholding exact adjusted between-group effects, 95% CIs and P values. The English account also leaves exact adjusted results unverified. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Exact adjusted between-group effects, 95% CIs, P values and pre/post values |
Material needed: The withheld original effects, intervals, denominators and relationship to media pre/post values remain unverified. Pre/post numbers or estimates do not fill the gaps. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 21 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N21 · Evidence conditionWhat population do Fotherby's 40 older participants represent?Required |
The existing sample is 40, with the English account recording ages 60–80. Hypertensive or prehypertensive composition and analysis denominators remain unverified. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Age, hypertension, prehypertension, baseline pressure and denominators |
Material needed: Whether all were hypertensive, prehypertensive counts, medication, crossover completion and analysis denominators remain unverified. The 40 are not used as every population, outcome or harm denominator. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 22 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N22 · Evidence conditionWhat are Fotherby's daytime SBP and unestablished-benefit results?Required |
The existing result is a daytime SBP fall of 2.0±5.2 mmHg, 95% CI 0–3.9. Office and DBP benefits remain unestablished. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Daytime SBP 2.0±5.2 mmHg, 95% CI 0–3.9 versus office and DBP |
Material needed: The definition of ±5.2, exact contrast, denominator, nocturnal and 24-hour results, P value and footnotes remain unverified. A reported fall is not arbitrarily negated or converted into full ambulatory benefit. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 23 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N23 · Evidence conditionWere order, washout and carryover verified in the older-person crossover trial?Required |
The existing design is a double-blind placebo crossover trial. Existing duration records distinguish crossover periods of 3 months from other durations. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Crossover sequence, periods, washout, pairing and original analysis |
Material needed: The report's original sequence and period tables, washout, carryover, paired analysis and period-specific denominators remain unverified. Periods are not counted as new trials or participants. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 24 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N24 · Evidence conditionIs Kim's long-term high- versus low-dose report a direct placebo replication?Required |
The existing citation account records high- versus low-dose comparison in a Japanese atrophic-gastritis population. It is not a direct placebo replication in hypertensive patients. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Atrophic-gastritis population, long-term active control and BP hierarchy |
Material needed: Hypertensive and prehypertensive composition, selection, group doses and applicability of prespecified primary BP outcomes remain unverified. Different-population and active-control boundaries are retained. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 25 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N25 · Evidence conditionWhat denominator do the 439 participants in the long-term report represent?Required |
The existing sample record reports 439, with analysis denominators unverified. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Reported counts, assignment, analysis, groups and follow-up denominators |
Material needed: Group assignment, analysis, long-term attrition and BP or harm denominators remain unverified. The 439 are not used as valid denominators for each time, outcome or harm. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 26 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N26 · Evidence conditionHow does unestablished long-term benefit differ from short-term results?Required |
The existing result retains unestablished long-term BP benefit and does not directly combine it with placebo results in hypertensive patients. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Long-term active control, result direction, duration and durability |
Material needed: Exact effects, intervals, duration, background care and same-population short-term comparisons remain unverified. This report alone establishes neither long-term null effects nor durable benefit. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 27 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N27 · Evidence conditionWhat does the 2012 meta-analysis record for 29 RCTs?Required |
The existing citation records short-term BP pooling across 29 RCTs. The overall account's approximate 3 mmHg systolic signal is distinguished from this report's exact pooled estimate. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
The existing 29 RCT account, short-term BP, inclusion, outcomes and populations |
Material needed: Inclusion tables, hypertensive or prehypertensive contributions, exact SBP and DBP effects, CIs, durations, doses and extraction remain unverified. The overall signal is not newly assigned as this report's exact estimate. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 28 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N28 · Evidence conditionWhat is the scope of the 2023 report's 20 RCTs and 890 participants?Required |
The existing citation records an approximate 3 mmHg SBP signal across 20 RCTs and 890 participants. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
The 20 RCTs, 890 participants, approximate 3 mmHg SBP and population or denominator scope |
Material needed: Exact pooled estimates, CIs, group and outcome denominators, inclusion, overlap, single-ingredient oral eligibility and durations remain unverified. The 890 are not used as a direct-trial or universal analysis denominator. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 29 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N29 · Evidence conditionCan 29, 20 and the direct reports be added as independent replications?Required |
Existing records contain 4 direct-evidence entries, 6 citations and accounts of 29 and 20 RCTs. The restriction on independently counting Duffy's related cohort is also retained. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Meta-analysis overlap, reports, trials, cohort relationships and unique counts |
Material needed: Actual overlap between the meta-analyses, inclusion and extraction of direct reports and unique trials or participants remain unverified. Neither 29+20 nor direct reports plus reviews are summed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 30 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N30 · Evidence conditionWere prespecified primary BP outcomes and analysis hierarchy verified?Required |
Ward, Duffy, older-person and long-term reports leave prespecified hierarchy or direct applicability as hypertension primary outcomes unverified. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Registration, protocols, SBP, DBP, time windows and prespecified analysis |
Material needed: Registry content, protocols, SAPs, prespecified outcomes, amendment timing and multiplicity remain unverified. Existing primary-outcome labels or a disabled co-primary-split indicator do not certify prespecification. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 31 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N31 · Evidence conditionDo randomization or masking labels establish verified procedures?Required |
Existing designs include randomized, double-blind, crossover and high- versus low-dose comparisons. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Random sequences, concealment, masking, group balance and control specifications |
Material needed: Random sequence, concealment, maintained masking, baseline balance and detailed procedures remain unverified because external materials are unread. Design labels or B1 are not converted into passing a new official assessment. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 32 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N32 · Evidence conditionWere between-group, pre/post and crossover contrasts distinguished?Required |
The existing account records that uncontrolled pre/post changes or the full 4-group result overstate vitamin C alone if read as its effect. Duffy's adjusted between-group estimate remains withheld. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Adjustment, analysis populations, ITT, PP, crossover, effect of interest and denominator |
Material needed: Effects of interest, analysis populations, covariates, models and isolated contributions remain unverified. Different contrasts are not converted into the same estimate. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 33 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N33 · Evidence conditionHow were attrition and missing BP data reflected in analyses?Required |
Existing sample records retain both total reported counts and unverified analysis denominators. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Group attrition, failed measurements, omissions, adjustment and time-specific analyses |
Material needed: Attrition reasons, valid ambulatory measurements, missingness, post-assignment exclusions and imputation remain unverified. No new excluded counts or effects are calculated. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 34 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N34 · Evidence conditionCould selected measurements and reporting explain a difference?Required |
Distinguishing office, daytime, 24-hour and SBP or DBP outcomes is an interpretation boundary in the existing account. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Devices, assessor masking, valid records, full results and analyses |
Material needed: Identical measurement procedures, assessor masking, selective-reporting scope and omitted outcomes remain unverified. Full original results and prespecified plans are needed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 35 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N35 · Evidence conditionHow are results with different populations, doses, durations and measurements handled?Required |
The existing synthesis records mostly short and heterogeneous studies. Different doses, durations and populations are not simply combined as the same effect. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Populations, single ingredients, combinations, durations, windows and pooled heterogeneity |
Material needed: Exact I², τ², models, prespecified subgroups, individual contributions and influence analyses remain unverified. No new heterogeneity, pooled effect or independent-replication count is calculated. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 36 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N36 · Evidence conditionWas the clinical importance of the approximate 3 mmHg signal verified?Required |
The existing account retains an approximate 3 mmHg SBP signal while stating that clinical thresholds and precision were not sufficiently verified. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Effects, intervals, clinical thresholds and individual or population applicability |
Material needed: Exact pooled CIs, external clinical thresholds, baseline risks, patient importance and guaranteed individual effects remain unverified. A small mean reduction is not converted into the same effect for everyone. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 37 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N37 · Evidence conditionDoes short-term BP answer durable-control or cardiovascular-event questions?Required |
The existing account records that sustained, 24-hour, nocturnal and cardiovascular-event benefits were not established. Replacing antihypertensives or preventing events exceeds the tested scope. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Long-term follow-up, post-stopping durability, target pressure and clinical events |
Material needed: Long-term population-specific control, medication needs, clinical-event effects, denominators and intervals remain unverified. Short-term surrogates and clinical events are distinguished. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 38 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N38 · Evidence conditionCan optimal effects for particular populations or doses be identified?Required |
The existing account explains that studies with different doses, durations and populations were not treated as the same effect. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Prespecified subgroups, interactions, direct dose comparison and populations |
Material needed: Prespecified contrasts and intervals by hypertension, prehypertension, age, medication, deficiency or dose remain unverified. Optimal doses or population-specific effects are not newly chosen across different studies. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 39 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N39 · Evidence conditionWere positive, withheld and unestablished-benefit findings all retained?Required |
Ward's vitamin-C-alone SBP and older-person daytime signals, unestablished office or DBP benefit, Duffy's withheld exact values and unestablished long-term benefit are preserved separately. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Vitamin-C-alone SBP, office pressure, DBP, Duffy's withheld values and long-term results |
Material needed: All contrary or null reports under identical conditions, selected results and a complete inclusion list remain unverified. Uncertainty is not declared null and supporting positive values do not replace confirmation. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 40 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N40 · Evidence conditionHow much is known about funding, product provision and employee authors?Required |
Ward funding, products and employee authors and Duffy's detailed contracts or manufacturer involvement remain unverified. Fotherby and Kim funding also remain unverified. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Funding, products, interests, analysis, publication and author roles |
Material needed: Contracts, product provision, interests, analysis and publication independence and meta-analysis interests remain unverified. Existing I2 is not transferred into independence verification in this work. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 41 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N41 · Evidence conditionHow do materials read in this work differ from external materials?Required |
The complete existing stored summary was read, linking 4 evidence entries and 6 citations to 6 reports. External abstracts, full texts and registration remain unread with access unattempted in this work. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Acquisition and reading of stored summaries, external abstracts, full texts and registration |
Material needed: Actual external identity, content, public availability, acquisition and needed details remain unverified. URLs or historical verification wording are not converted into current external verification or access failure. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 42 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N42 · Evidence conditionWhat do the existing evidence date and historical abstract checks or comparisons record?Required |
The existing evidence date is 2026-09-07 and correction history is an empty list. Historical abstract checks, unverified registration and independent comparisons are preserved as original records. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
The existing evidence date, correction history, historical access and production time |
Material needed: Historical search end, actual reading locations, times, correction details and current external content remain unverified. The 2026-09-07 date is not used as completed external reading or content review in this work. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 43 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N43 · Evidence conditionWhat do the existing Korean and English accounts, C54 and assessment axes record?Required |
Existing C54, caution and B/S/R0/I2/E+/B1/C0 axes are preserved. A disabled no-human-study indicator and empty values are also original verdict records. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Existing Korean and English accounts, C54, caution, assessment axes and empty history |
Material needed: Detailed external translation comparison or new clinical or independence certification was not performed. Historical cross-checks and grade records are not converted into completed clinical content review in this work. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 44 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N44 · Evidence conditionWhat records concern gastrointestinal harms of high-dose oral vitamin C alone?Supplementary; required for the relevant harm scope |
The existing safety account retains possible diarrhea or gastrointestinal discomfort with high oral doses and limited trial-specific event counts. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Diarrhea, abdominal discomfort, event definitions, severity and collection |
Material needed: Actual events, withdrawals, definitions, severity, collection, masking and group-specific counts remain unverified. General cautions are not converted into incidence or no events in this trial. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 45 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N45 · Evidence conditionAre combination-related pressure increases and single-ingredient gastrointestinal cautions the same harm?Supplementary; required for the relevant harm scope |
The combination-related BP increase in Ward's title is not attributed to the single ingredient. Gastrointestinal caution for high doses of vitamin C alone is a separate record. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Grape-seed combinations, vitamin C alone, event definitions, contribution and alternatives |
Material needed: The 4-group comparative harm estimates, baseline and concurrent exposures, interaction and single-ingredient causality remain unverified. The title is not converted into causal BP increases or incidence for vitamin C alone. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 46 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N46 · Evidence conditionCan harm frequency and exposure or recovery times be calculated?Supplementary; required for the relevant harm scope |
The existing account records limited trial-specific adverse-event counts. Total sample labels are not used as harm denominators. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Exposed people, people with events, event counts, observation, stopping and recovery |
Material needed: Group-specific harm denominators, counts, duplication, onset, recovery, stopping, re-exposure and follow-up loss remain unverified. Incidence or comparative risk is not calculated from cautions lacking denominators or time. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 47 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N47 · Evidence conditionWhat is the scope of long-term, stone-risk, kidney-disease or iron-overload materials?Supplementary; required for the relevant harm scope |
The existing product account records caution with stone predisposition, kidney disease and iron overload. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Long-term and rare harms, population-specific exposure, duration and interactions |
Material needed: Long-term and rare events, special populations, concurrent medication and risk sizes in hypertensive populations remain unverified. Short-term positive findings or few recorded events are not extended into overall safety or individual dosing instructions. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 48 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N48 · Evidence conditionCan harms across reports be summed as independent events?Supplementary; required for the relevant harm scope |
The stored reports do not link harm estimates to unique events. Existing cautions and combination boundaries are retained by material. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Unique events, studies, repeated citations and matching efficacy or harm populations |
Material needed: Original-event relationships, repeated citation in reviews, regulatory material and independent event or participant counts remain unverified. Efficacy-report counts or repeated general cautions are not counted as independent harm events. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 49 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N49 · Evidence conditionWhich existing materials could update the gap record?Required |
This record preserves existing numbers, unverified fields and withheld values. Direct content review and external verification remain incomplete, and gaps are not filled with effects or frequencies. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the existing stored summary. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Original contrasts, CIs, group and outcome denominators, prespecified hierarchy and change events |
Material needed: Protocols, group- and time-specific outcomes, ± definitions, meta-analysis inclusion tables, harms and durability materials are needed. Material additions and condition changes are recorded separately; no new research, calculation or regrading is executed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |