CHAMGAP
Verdict No. 3077 · Search date 2026-09-08 · Methodology v1.0

Test beverage containing hot-water extract of sun-dried lotus leaves,
does it really help with Reduction of whole-body fat percentage in adults with overweight?

30-Second Summary
C
Evidence Grade C · 46 · Safety caution
Legacy grade under review
This verdict covers whole-body fat percentage after 12 weeks of a beverage containing 1-2 g/day hot-water extract of sun-dried lotus leaves only.
Caution. No test-beverage adverse reactions were reported among the 60 analyzed participants, but this was a small 12-week post-selected sample. Pregnancy, lactation, allergy, liver or kidney disease, and interactions with blood-pressure or glucose medicines remain unverified.
What the
research shows
The legacy C·46 rating is under review. The retained record lists 95 randomized participants, 22 discontinuations, and 60 overweight completers analyzed. Reasons for excluding the other 13 are unverified in this record; they are not all counted as discontinuations. Reported 12-week body-fat changes were -2.6 percentage points in men receiving 1 g/day (P=.019), -3.7 in women receiving 1 g/day (P=.009), and -2.9 in women receiving 2 g/day (P=.027). Whether each is a between-group contrast or a within-group change remains unverified; 95% CIs and a unified main effect were not available. Industry was involved in sponsorship, product supply, and author employment.
What the
ads claim
Do not claim that lotus-leaf tea causes weight loss, that effects are uniform across sex and dose, that long-term safety is established, or that weight and visceral-fat reduction were proven.
*

Useful facts when choosing a product

  • This verdict applies only to the displayed lotus part, formulation, route, population, claim, endpoint, and comparator.
  • Leaf, plumule, whole seed, rhizome, node, tea, extract, food, juice, and combination products are not interchangeable.
  • Caution. No test-beverage adverse reactions were reported among the 60 analyzed participants, but this was a small 12-week post-selected sample. Pregnancy, lactation, allergy, liver or kidney disease, and interactions with blood-pressure or glucose medicines remain unverified.
ID

Chamgap Semantic Classification Code

Permanent code issued

S.lotus-leaf-hot-water-extract.oral-beverage.body-fat-percentage.reduce.placebo

Supplements and nutraceuticals > Hot-water extract of sun-dried lotus leaves > Test beverage > Whole-body fat percentage > Reduction claim > 0-g extract test beverage

Bound to whole-body fat percentage among completers with overweight after 1-2 g/day in a 400-mL test beverage for 12 weeks; lotus-leaf tea, weight, visceral fat, waist, and the full 95-person randomized cohort are separate. The code identifies the intervention and claim; it never contains the evidence grade, score, or safety result.

Download semantic index (JSON) · Codebook v1

⌘

Exact Claim Classification

These independent facets prevent evidence from different forms, routes, populations, effects, and comparators from being mixed.

Intervention classS · Supplement or nutraceutical
Canonical ingredient or interventionLotus leaf hot-water extract
Source or part usedSun-dried Nelumbo nucifera leaves extracted with hot water; quercetin-3-O-glucuronide and quercetin were major constituents
Formulation or processingTest beverage 400 mL/day (two 200-mL bottles) containing 0, 1, or 2 g extract
RouteOral beverage
DoseLotus leaf hot-water extract 1 or 2 g/day
Duration12 weeks
PopulationChinese adults aged 40-60 with overweight; 95 with BMI 23-30 were registered, while the paper analyzed 60 completers with BMI 24-28
Effect or conditionLower whole-body fat percentage
Primary endpointChange in whole-body fat percentage at weeks 6 and 12
ComparatorSame-format test beverage containing 0 g extract
Duplicate-detection keyLotus leaf hot-water extract|Test beverage 400 mL/day (two 200-mL bottles) containing 0, 1, or 2 g extract|Oral beverage|Chinese adults aged 40-60 with overweight; 95 with BMI 23-30 were registered, while the paper analyzed 60 completers with BMI 24-28|Lower whole-body fat percentage|12 weeks
01

What the research actually shows

The PMID 34852695 report, the 95-person design, retrospective registration and multiple primary outcomes in NCT04651023, and publisher bibliographic metadata were cross-checked.

02

Why this is classified as C (46)

Axes are S/R1/I0/EX/B2/CX. Post-randomization selection of 60 completers from a 95-person industry trial, sex- and dose-splitting, retrospective registration, multiple primary outcomes, and absent 95% CIs yield C/46.

Counterpoint. The defined hot-water extract and 0-g beverage comparator are direct, but no independent replication was identified and the result cannot be transferred to lotus-leaf tea, capsules, or ordinary food use.

Rejudgment record. Independent Codex cross-check — One exact plant part, formulation, population, claim, endpoint, and comparator

Stored scoring profile
EndpointSSurrogate marker - laboratory or imaging measures
ReplicationR1Single confirmatory trial
IndependenceI0Evidence comes only from manufacturer studies
Effect sizeEXThe clinical size of the effect could not be judged
PrecisionCXNo pooled confidence interval could be confirmed

Stored derived and displayed grades match; this is not a current recalculation or validity check (C).

03

Evidence Table

StudyDesignSampleFundingEndpointResultWeight
Fat reducing effects of Nelumbo nucifera leaf extract in overweight patientsThree-arm randomized trial, blinded to participants and care providers, with a 0 g control drink; registered 11 years after completion.95 randomized; discontinuations 7/6/9; only 22/22/16 overweight completers analyzed.Sponsored by Shanghai Meiji Health Science and Technology; several authors employed in Meiji R&D; study drinks supplied.Whole-body fat percentage at 12 weeks.Reported subgroup changes: men, 1 g/day, -2.6 percentage points (P=.019); women, 1 g/day, -3.7 (P=.009); women, 2 g/day, -2.9 (P=.027). No 95% CI reported; the contrast underlying these changes is unverified in the retained record.Direct formulation and control drink, but post hoc selection, industry involvement, and multiple analyses limit interpretation.
§

Receipt — 1 References

Retained evidence-access date: 2026-09-08. This correction checked record consistency; it did not reverify every original source or recertify the grade.

Ye L et al. Nat Prod Res. 2022;36(18). PMID: 34852695. DOI: 10.1080/14786419.2021.2010196. NCT04651023.
Reported subgroup changes: men, 1 g/day, -2.6 percentage points (P=.019); women, 1 g/day, -3.7 (P=.009); women, 2 g/day, -2.9 (P=.027). No 95% CI reported; the contrast underlying these changes is unverified in the retained record. Direct formulation and control drink, but post hoc selection, industry involvement, and multiple analyses limit interpretation.
Retained record · not newly source-verified
Codex compared retained study and verdict records with ChatGPT's methodological consistency review. No new literature search, full-text acquisition, or external expert review was performed.
This correction by: Codex · Evidence date: 2026-09-08 · Corrections: 1
↺

Correction log — 1

Corrections applied to this verdict, in chronological order. Changes are logged, not erased.

  • 2026-09-14 · Editorial correction and legacy-grade review notice — Replaced six English evidence placeholders and citation descriptions with retained facts, and disclosed denominator and contrast uncertainties. Grade and score are retained, not certified as a new final assessment. (grade C unchanged)

Cite the review status too

Legacy grade under review. New grade-card distribution is on hold.

[Chamgap] Sun-Dried Lotus Leaf Hot-Water Extract for Body-Fat Percentage—A Positive 60-Completer Analysis After Post-Randomization Selection From 95 Participants — legacy C · 46, under review. https://chamgap.com/en/verdicts/weight/lotus-leaf-hot-water-extract-whole-body-fat-percentage/ · CC BY 4.0
!

What this document does and does not do

Chamgap is an information source. It reports what research has and has not confirmed; it does not tell readers what to take or buy. That decision belongs to readers and, when needed, medical or legal professionals. This verdict reflects literature available up to the search date and may change as new research appears. Nothing here is medical advice.
↑