CHAMGAP
VERIFIEDPassed the Codex final verification and publication gate. Evidence-verification cutoff: 2026-08-15. AI was used for research and drafting; the existence of all 1 cited sources was verified at the original page, followed by blind grading, adversarial audit, and build validation. Methodology v1.0.
Verdict No. 2692 · Search date 2026-08-15 · Methodology v1.0

Guided web CBT self-help,
does it really help with Reduced onset of major depressive disorder over 12 months?

30-Second Summary
B
Evidence Grade B · 72 · Safety caution
Therapist-guided web self-help reduced onset of major depressive disorder in adults with subthreshold depression
Suicidal thoughts, marked impairment, or worsening depression require prompt professional assessment rather than continued online self-help alone.
What the
research shows
The grade is B with 72 points. MDD occurred in 55/202 (27.2%) with guided self-help versus 84/204 (41.2%) with web psychoeducation, adjusted HR 0.59 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.82).
What the
ads claim
The tested program combined six structured sessions with individualized online trainer feedback; it was not a screening quiz or automated content alone.
*

Useful facts when choosing a product

  • Participants had CES-D scores of at least 16 but no current MDD.
  • Controls retained usual-care access and received web psychoeducation.
  • The registration is DRKS00004709.
ID

Chamgap Semantic Classification Code

Candidate index · review held

X.therapist-guided-web-based-cbt-and-problem-solving-self-help.behavioral.onset-of-major-depressive-disorder-over.reduce.UNK

Behaviors, exposures and policies > Therapist-guided web-based CBT and problem-solving self-help > Behavioral delivery > onset of major depressive disorder over > Reduction claim > Unknown

An automated migration candidate, not an issued permanent code; exact claim scope remains under review. This machine-generated migration candidate helps retrieval but is not a permanent assignment. The original verdict ID and URL remain authoritative.

Download semantic index (JSON) · Codebook v1

Gap Measurement · Verdict 2692 · B 72
What advertising claims
What independent, higher-quality research supports
△ GAP
01

What the research actually shows

An independent researcher used central automated computer randomization linked only to trial IDs, keeping recruiters unable to influence allocation. SCID interviewers were masked and replaced for the next interview if masking broke. All 406 randomized participants entered assigned-group analysis, with multiple-imputation survival sensitivity analysis. DRKS00004709 prespecified 12-month MDD onset, matching the paper. SCID follow-up was completed by 335/406 (82.5%), so 17.5% loss counts as one avoidable limitation. The European Union and German statutory health insurance funded the study. Separate disclosures described intervention rights and author ownership in a licensing institute.

02

Why this is classified as B (72)

A publicly funded randomized trial substantially reduced diagnosed MDD, but one trial and follow-up loss above 15% give B with 72 points.

Counterpoint. People with suicidality, marked impairment, or worsening depression need professional assessment rather than self-help alone.

Rejudgment record. Cross-check applied — Cross-checked the JAMA paper and DRKS00004709 for the primary outcome, central allocation, SCID assessor masking, intention-to-treat and missing-data methods, attrition, and funding

Stored scoring profile
EndpointHHard endpoint - actual events such as death
ReplicationR1Single confirmatory trial
IndependenceI2Decisive evidence is publicly or non-profit funded
Effect sizeE+Meets the clinically important threshold

Stored derived and displayed grades match; this is not a current recalculation or validity check (B).

▦

Sub-claim grades by effect

This ingredient is marketed for several effects. A single overall grade blends strong and weak claims together, so each effect is graded separately here. The overall grade reflects the strongest disconfirming or core claim.

Effect (sub-claim)GradeBasis
Guided web self-help reduces 12-month MDD onsetBThe adjusted HR was 0.59 (0.42 to 0.82).
✓

Cross-check — AI research and Codex final gate

AI was used for research and drafting. Blind grading, adversarial audit, and the methodology boundary rules were then reapplied before Codex performed the final evidence, grade, copy, and build checks. If a grade cannot be narrowed, both evidence positions and their reasons are published.
03

Evidence Table

StudyDesignSampleFundingEndpointResultWeight
Buntrock C, Ebert DD, Lehr D, Smit F, Riper H, Berking M, Cuijpers P. 2016Assessor-masked randomized clinical trial406 randomized and included in intention-to-treat analysis (202/204); 335 completed SCID follow-upEuropean Union EFRE and BARMER GEK statutory health insuranceTime to onset of MDD over 12 months55/202 (27.2%) versus 84/204 (41.2%); adjusted HR 0.59 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.82), P=.002Pivotal single publicly funded trial
§

Receipt — 1 References

All 1 cited sources were verified for existence at the original page (as of 2026-08-15).

Buntrock C, Ebert DD, Lehr D, Smit F, Riper H, Berking M, Cuijpers P. Effect of a Web-Based Guided Self-help Intervention for Prevention of Major Depression in Adults With Subthreshold Depression. JAMA. 2016;315(17):1854-1863. PMID: 27139058. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.4326. DRKS00004709.
checked
Research and draft: AI used · Cross-check: blind grading and adversarial audit
Final verification and publication gate: Codex · Evidence date: 2026-08-15 · Corrections: none
↗

Cite this verdict

Guided web CBT self-help x prevention of major depressive disorder Evidence Grade B card
[Chamgap] Guided web CBT self-help x prevention of major depressive disorder — Evidence Grade B·72. 1 cited sources checked. Source: https://chamgap.com/en/verdicts/mood/guided-web-cbt-subthreshold-depression-mdd-prevention/ · CC BY 4.0

CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution; do not distort grades, numbers, or verdict meaning.

!

What this document does and does not do

Chamgap is an information source. It reports what research has and has not confirmed; it does not tell readers what to take or buy. That decision belongs to readers and, when needed, medical or legal professionals. This verdict reflects literature available up to the search date and may change as new research appears. Nothing here is medical advice.
↑