CHAMGAP
APPROVEDReviewed and approved by the Chamgap Editorial Team (2026-08-08). The draft was written by AI, the existence of all 3 cited sources was verified at the original page, and the verdict passed blind grading and adversarial audit. Methodology v0.7.
Verdict No. 2460 · Search date 2026-08-08 · Methodology v0.7

A desk potted plant,
does it really help with Reduced anxiety and stress in office workers?

30-Second Summary
C
Evidence Grade C · 46 · Safety acceptable
Anxiety scores fell slightly, but time and expectation effects were not separated
The intervention is generally low risk, but soil mold, small insects, allergies, watering demands, and desk-space burden can occur. Participants reported mold, insects, withering, and care burden.
What the
research shows
The grade is C. Sixty-three nonmanagerial employees at a Japanese electric company completed one plant-free week followed by four weeks with a plant. Mean STAI trait anxiety fell from 47.9 (SD 10.6) to 46.2 (11.1), a 1.7-point change, P=.022. There was no concurrent control or randomized order, and the package included choosing, caring for, and gazing at the plant during a three-minute break.
What the
ads claim
Korean air-purifying plant marketing often blends pollutant removal with companion-plant wellbeing. This study measured no air quality and tested a package of choice, care, gaze shifting, and rest. Verdict 2266 is C with 50 points for structured horticultural therapy and depressive symptoms; it is not equivalent to one passive desk plant.
*

Useful facts when choosing a product

  • Workers chose one small plant from six categories and kept it by the PC for four weeks.
  • The intervention included choosing, watering, intentional gazing, and three-minute rest.
  • Indoor-air pollutant removal was not measured.
Gap Measurement · Verdict 2460 · C 46
What advertising claims
What independent, higher-quality research supports
△ GAP
01

What the research actually shows

Seventy-five of 1,500 employees volunteered; six withdrew. Of 69 completers, six managers were excluded, leaving 63 nonmanagers. Choices were three air plants, seven bonsai, five cacti, 15 foliage plants, 11 succulents, and 22 kokedama. Each plant was 15 to 20 cm high and 7 to 10 cm wide, kept beside the PC for four weeks, watered by the worker, and gazed at for three minutes when fatigued. Japanese STAI trait Y-2 was measured at 6 p.m. after the plant-free week and after the plant phase. No separate perceived-stress scale was used; pulse was self-measured. During the plant phase, 17/63 showed a significant pulse decrease after rest and 9/63 an increase. No primary endpoint was explicitly designated and no registration number was confirmed. The funding statement reads: ‘This work was funded by Mitsubishi Electric Corporation in 2017.’

02

Why this is classified as C (46)

A small positive paired change is limited by small size, short duration, no concurrent control, unblinded subjective outcome, and selective exclusion, giving C with 46 points.

Counterpoint. A plant and gaze break may be a pleasant low-cost habit, but this is not evidence that it treats anxiety disorders or occupational stress.

Rejudgment record. Cross-check applied — A small STAI change in a fixed-order uncontrolled before-after study of 63 workers using a bundled intervention

Scoring profile behind this grade
EndpointPPatient-reported treatment goal - the symptom is the goal
ReplicationR1Single confirmatory trial
IndependenceI1Mixed funding sources
Effect sizeE~Statistically positive but below the threshold

The scoring table and the verdict agree (C).

Sub-claim grades by effect

This ingredient is marketed for several effects. A single overall grade blends strong and weak claims together, so each effect is graded separately here. The overall grade reflects the strongest disconfirming or core claim.

Effect (sub-claim)GradeBasis
Reduced STAI trait anxietyCThe 1.7-point mean decrease was small and uncontrolled.
Lower pulse after a three-minute breakCThe proportion with a decrease rose from 4.8% to 27.0%, while 14.3% increased.
Indoor air purification?This study did not measure indoor air quality.

Cross-check — Codex and Claude

This verdict was drafted by Codex through literature review and source-existence checks, cross-checked through blind grading and adversarial audit, and settled by reapplying the methodology boundary rules. Cases with split grades were resolved through rejudgment.
03

Evidence Table

StudyDesignSampleFundingEndpointResultWeight
Study 1Fixed-order paired uncontrolled before-after comparison of one plant-free week followed by four plant weeks63This work was funded by Mitsubishi Electric Corporation in 2017.Japanese STAI trait Y-2 and self-measured pulseSTAI 47.9 (SD 10.6) versus 46.2 (11.1), P=.022; high anxiety 31.7% versus 30.2%Pivotal but weak before-after evidence
§

Receipt — 3 References

All 3 cited sources were verified for existence at the original page (as of 2026-08-08).

Toyoda M, Yokota Y, Barnes M, Kaneko M. Potential of a Small Indoor Plant on the Desk for Reducing Office Workers' Stress. HortTechnology. 2020;30(1):55-63. DOI: 10.21273/HORTTECH04427-19.
checked
Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
checked
Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene R, Vagg PR, Jacobs GA. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press; 1983.
checked
Draft and rewrite: Codex (AI) · Verification: Codex blind grading and adversarial audit · Final adjudication: Claude
Reviewed and approved: Chamgap Editorial Team · Approval date: 2026-08-08 · Corrections: none

Cite this verdict

A desk potted plant x reduced office anxiety and stress Evidence Grade C card
[Chamgap] A desk potted plant x reduced office anxiety and stress — Evidence Grade C·46. 3 cited sources checked. Source: https://chamgap.com/en/verdicts/mood/desk-potted-plant-office-anxiety-stress/ · CC BY 4.0

CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution; do not distort grades, numbers, or verdict meaning.

!

What this document does and does not do

Chamgap is an information source. It reports what research has and has not confirmed; it does not tell readers what to take or buy. That decision belongs to readers and, when needed, medical or legal professionals. This verdict reflects literature available up to the search date and may change as new research appears. Nothing here is medical advice.