CHAMGAP
APPROVEDReviewed and approved by the Chamgap Editorial Team (2026-07-20). The draft was written by AI, the existence of all 3 cited sources was verified at the original page, and the verdict passed blind grading and adversarial audit. Methodology v0.6.
Verdict No. 824 · Search date 2026-07-20 · Methodology v0.6

Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir,
does it really help with Sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment across all chronic hepatitis C genotypes?

30-Second Summary
B
Evidence Grade B · 79 · Safety unknown
Twelve weeks cures virologic infection in most patients across genotypes, but special populations require regimen adjustment
What the
research shows
Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir is rated B because it achieves very high SVR12 rates after 12 weeks across chronic hepatitis C genotypes 1 through 6. ASTRAL-1 achieved 99% (618/624) in genotypes 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6, while ASTRAL-2 achieved 99% in genotype 2 and ASTRAL-3 achieved 95% in genotype 3. SVR12 is a validated endpoint used as virologic cure because later relapse is rare, but pivotal phase 3 trials were concentrated in Gilead sponsorship and some used single-arm or performance-goal comparisons. Decompensated cirrhosis, prior DAA failure, and retreatment may change ribavirin use, duration, or regimen choice, and cure does not create immunity against reinfection.
What the
ads claim
Promotion can turn the result into a 100% cure for every hepatitis C patient in 12 weeks, erasing differences in genotype, cirrhosis, prior therapy, and interactions. Success is very high but not 100%, and decompensated cirrhosis or prior DAA failure requires specialist regimen selection.
*

Useful facts when choosing a product

  • The adult fixed-dose tablet contains sofosbuvir 400 mg and velpatasvir 100 mg and is taken once daily; 12 weeks is a common standard duration without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis.
  • Decompensated cirrhosis should not simply receive the identical monotherapy regimen; specialist treatment such as 12 weeks with ribavirin is selected according to authorization and guidance.
  • Headache and fatigue are common. Acid-reducing agents and several inducing medicines can reduce velpatasvir exposure, so every prescription, nonprescription drug, and supplement requires interaction review.
  • Severe bradycardia has been reported when amiodarone is combined with sofosbuvir-containing therapy, so coadministration is not recommended. Prior hepatitis B infection is assessed before treatment because reactivation can occur.
Gap Measurement · Verdict 824 · B 79
What advertising claims
What independent, higher-quality research supports
△ GAP
01

What the research actually shows

In ASTRAL-1, 618 of 624 participants with genotypes 1, 2, 4, 5, or 6 achieved SVR12. In ASTRAL-2, 12 weeks of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir produced higher SVR12 in genotype 2 than 12 weeks of sofosbuvir/ribavirin; in ASTRAL-3, the corresponding result in genotype 3 was 95% versus 80% with 24 weeks of sofosbuvir/ribavirin. In ASTRAL-4 decompensated cirrhosis, overall SVR12 was 83% with 12 weeks alone, 94% with 12 weeks plus ribavirin, and 86% with 24 weeks alone, with ribavirin particularly important for genotype 3. All belonged to the Gilead development program.

02

Why this is classified as B (79)

ASTRAL repeatedly achieved 95% to 99% SVR12 across genotypes 1 through 6 using a clinically validated cure endpoint. Concentrated Gilead sponsorship and some single-arm or performance-goal structures, together with corpus parity with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir B79, yield B with 79 points. Headache, fatigue, interactions, and cirrhosis-specific regimens are safety and scope issues.

Counterpoint. Reinfection remains possible after SVR12, and patients with prior cirrhosis may continue liver-cancer surveillance and liver care. Cirrhosis stage, prior DAA exposure, drug interactions, and hepatitis B status matter to treatment design.

Rejudgment record. New verdict — Gave high weight to 95% to 99% SVR12 across all genotypes in the ASTRAL program and to SVR12 as a validated cure endpoint, while accounting for concentrated Gilead sponsorship, some single-arm or performance-goal comparisons, and corpus parity with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir B79

Sub-claim grades by effect

This ingredient is marketed for several effects. A single overall grade blends strong and weak claims together, so each effect is graded separately here. The overall grade reflects the strongest disconfirming or core claim.

Effect (sub-claim)GradeBasis
Twelve-week SVR12 across all chronic hepatitis C genotypes without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosisBASTRAL-1, ASTRAL-2, and ASTRAL-3 repeatedly achieved 95% to 99%, with manufacturer sponsorship and some single-arm or performance-goal structures.
The identical 12-week monotherapy regimen in decompensated cirrhosis or after prior DAA failureCASTRAL-4 showed differences by ribavirin use and genotype, and prior DAA failure requires a separate retreatment strategy.
Prevention of hepatitis C reinfection after achieving SVR12?No human prophylactic efficacy literature supports vaccine-like use, and SVR12 does not create immunity.

Cross-check — Codex and Claude

This verdict was drafted by Codex through literature review and source-existence checks, cross-checked through blind grading and adversarial audit, and settled by reapplying the methodology boundary rules. Cases with split grades were resolved through rejudgment.
03

Evidence Table

StudyDesignSampleFundingEndpointResultWeight
Feld JJ et al. ASTRAL-1 2015Multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled phase 3 trial with a prespecified performance comparison6Sponsored by Gilead SciencesSVR12 twelve weeks after completing twelve weeks of treatment618 of 624 participants, or 99%, achieved SVR12.Pivotal pangenotypic cure evidence
Foster GR et al. ASTRAL-2 and ASTRAL-3 2015Randomized open-label active-controlled phase 3 noninferiority and superiority trials552Sponsored by Gilead SciencesSVR12Rates were 99% versus 94% in genotype 2 and 95% versus 80% in genotype 3, favoring sofosbuvir/velpatasvir over sofosbuvir/ribavirin comparators.Direct active-comparator confirmation in genotypes 2 and 3
Curry MP et al. ASTRAL-4 2015Randomized open-label phase 3 trial in decompensated cirrhosis267Sponsored by Gilead SciencesSVR12 with 12 weeks alone, 12 weeks plus ribavirin, or 24 weeks aloneOverall SVR12 was 83%, 94%, and 86%; genotype 3 achieved 85% with ribavirin versus 50% with either monotherapy duration.Conditional-scope evidence in advanced cirrhosis
§

Receipt — 3 References

All 3 cited sources were verified for existence at the original page (as of 2026-07-20).

Feld JJ, Jacobson IM, Hézode C, et al. Sofosbuvir and Velpatasvir for HCV Genotype 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 Infection. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(27):2599-2607. PMID: 26571066. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1512610.
checked
Foster GR, Afdhal N, Roberts SK, et al. Sofosbuvir and Velpatasvir for HCV Genotype 2 and 3 Infection. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(27):2608-2617. PMID: 26575258. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1512612.
checked
Curry MP, O'Leary JG, Bzowej N, et al. Sofosbuvir and Velpatasvir for HCV in Patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(27):2618-2628. PMID: 26569658. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1512614.
checked
Draft and rewrite: Codex (AI) · Verification: Codex blind grading and adversarial audit · Final adjudication: Claude
Reviewed and approved: Chamgap Editorial Team · Approval date: 2026-07-20 · Corrections: none

Cite this verdict

Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir x 12-week SVR12 across all chronic hepatitis C genotypes Evidence Grade B card
[Chamgap] Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir x 12-week SVR12 across all chronic hepatitis C genotypes — Evidence Grade B·79. 3 cited sources checked. Source: https://chamgap.com/en/verdicts/liver/sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-pangenotypic-hepatitis-c-svr12/ · CC BY 4.0

CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution; do not distort grades, numbers, or verdict meaning.

!

What this document does and does not do

Chamgap is an information source. It reports what research has and has not confirmed; it does not tell readers what to take or buy. That decision belongs to readers and, when needed, medical or legal professionals. This verdict reflects literature available up to the search date and may change as new research appears. Nothing here is medical advice.