CHAMGAP
VERIFIEDPassed the Codex final verification and publication gate. Evidence-verification cutoff: 2026-08-26. AI was used for research and drafting; the existence of all 1 cited sources was verified at the original page, followed by blind grading, adversarial audit, and build validation. Methodology v0.8.
Verdict No. 2955 · Search date 2026-08-26 · Methodology v0.8

Quercetin 500 mg daily,
does it really help with Reduced intrahepatic lipid measured by MRI-PDFF in fatty liver disease?

30-Second Summary
C
Evidence Grade C · 54 · Safety acceptable
MRI liver fat fell, but the effect was not separated from concurrent weight loss
Routine blood safety measures did not differ and no intervention-related adverse event was reported. The 41-participant trial was too small to assess rare harms.
What the
research shows
The grade is C with 54 points. In a 41-participant double-blind crossover trial, intrahepatic lipid changed from 11.5%±6.4 to 9.6%±5.8 during quercetin, about -1.9 points, versus -0.1%±2.6 during placebo; P=0.013 and multiplicity-adjusted P=0.028.
What the
ads claim
A 12-week MRI result for quercetin 500 mg cannot be generalized to all polyphenols or to cirrhosis, death, or other clinical liver outcomes.
*

Useful facts when choosing a product

  • MRI-PDFF is an imaging surrogate for intrahepatic lipid.
  • Thirty-six of 41 participants completed the trial.
  • Concurrent weight loss leaves the pathway unresolved.
Gap Measurement · Verdict 2955 · C 54
What advertising claims
What independent, higher-quality research supports
△ GAP
01

What the research actually shows

Forty-one participants with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease were randomized to 12 weeks of quercetin or placebo, crossed over after a four-week washout, and 36 completed. ITT results were reported, but this remains one trial with fewer than 200 participants. No commercial manufacturer funding, free product, or outsourced analysis was disclosed in the publicly available paper; authors were affiliated with Army Medical University and Xinqiao Hospital and declared no competing interests. A separate joint funding-agency name was not identified in the public text.

02

Why this is classified as C (54)

A statistically positive MRI surrogate from one 41-participant trial gives C with 54 points; weight mediation remains possible.

Counterpoint. Liver enzymes and other secondary outcomes were not significant.

Rejudgment record. Cross-check applied — MRI-PDFF improvement in one small crossover trial with possible weight mediation

Scoring profile behind this grade
EndpointSSurrogate marker - laboratory or imaging measures
ReplicationR1Single confirmatory trial
IndependenceI2Decisive evidence is publicly or non-profit funded
Effect sizeE+Meets the clinically important threshold

The scoring table and the verdict agree (C).

Sub-claim grades by effect

This ingredient is marketed for several effects. A single overall grade blends strong and weak claims together, so each effect is graded separately here. The overall grade reflects the strongest disconfirming or core claim.

Effect (sub-claim)GradeBasis
Reduced MRI liver fat over 12 weeksCStatistically positive surrogate
Improved clinical liver outcomes?The trial did not test cirrhosis, hospitalization, or death.

Cross-check — AI research and Codex final gate

AI was used for research and drafting. Blind grading, adversarial audit, and the methodology boundary rules were then reapplied before Codex performed the final evidence, grade, copy, and build checks. If a grade cannot be narrowed, both evidence positions and their reasons are published.
03

Evidence Table

StudyDesignSampleFundingEndpointResultWeight
Study 1Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial36No separate joint funding-agency name identified in public text; no manufacturer involvement disclosedMRI-PDFF intrahepatic lipid after 12 weeks11.5%±6.4 to 9.6%±5.8 versus placebo change -0.1%±2.6; P=0.013, adjusted P=0.028Single small surrogate-endpoint trial
§

Receipt — 1 References

All 1 cited sources were verified for existence at the original page (as of 2026-08-26).

Li N, Cui C, Xu J, et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2024;120:507-517. PMID: 39032786.
checked
Research and draft: AI used · Cross-check: blind grading and adversarial audit
Final verification and publication gate: Codex · Verification cutoff: 2026-08-26 · Corrections: none

Cite this verdict

Benefit of Quercetin for MRI-Measured Intrahepatic Lipid Evidence Grade C card
[Chamgap] Benefit of Quercetin for MRI-Measured Intrahepatic Lipid — Evidence Grade C·54. 1 cited sources checked. Source: https://chamgap.com/en/verdicts/liver/quercetin-nafld-intrahepatic-lipid/ · CC BY 4.0

CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution; do not distort grades, numbers, or verdict meaning.

!

What this document does and does not do

Chamgap is an information source. It reports what research has and has not confirmed; it does not tell readers what to take or buy. That decision belongs to readers and, when needed, medical or legal professionals. This verdict reflects literature available up to the search date and may change as new research appears. Nothing here is medical advice.