Work-focused CBT and job support × Durable benefit in the full cohort — Evidence Check

Required evidence, verification status and materials actually read
Item	AVerification status	BReading scope	CReview item	DCurrent findings	EWhy unverified	FRequired materials and conditions	GFurther research
1	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N01 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsWhat are the original long-term full-cohort claim and subclaim verdict?Required	The selected row concerns the long-term full-cohort effect, carries original grade D and notes a null full-cohort extension over 10 to 46 months. The parent concerns 12 months, grade B with 76 points. R02	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Long-term full-cohort question, grade, note and parent context	Distinguish the original long-term verdict from the 12-month context
2	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N02 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsWhich recruitment and analysis populations does the long-term full cohort refer to?Required	The original trial randomized 1,193 adults with anxiety/depression (630/563); the extension analyzes the same cohort. R01 R02	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Original allocation, extension eligibility, full cohort, subgroups and denominators	Present original allocation, long-term observations, analysis and subgroups separately
3	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N03 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsIs the 10-to-46-month observation window the same as the original program duration?Required	The long-term report covers an extension over 10 to 46 months. The original combined service included up to 15 CBT sessions and individual job support. R01 R02	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Extension time points, duration, observation window, termination and exposure	Distinguish treatment exposure from observation duration
4	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N04 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsAre the original combined service and usual care preserved accurately?Required	The original allocation comparison was combined AWaC work-focused CBT and individual job support versus usual care. R01 R02	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Specifications of CBT, job support, usual care and additional management	Show the scope of combined-service assignment and subsequent exposure
5	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N05 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsAre long-term income, work participation and months without benefits separate outcomes?Required	The preserved counterview states that full-cohort differences in income, work participation and months without benefits were not significant. R02	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Definitions, units, aggregation and periods for each long-term endpoint	Present income, work and periods without benefits separately
6	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N06 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsAre long-term full-cohort effect estimates, CIs and P values provided?Required	The preserved long-term account provides qualitative information that full-cohort differences in the three outcomes were not significant. R02	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Endpoint-specific direct differences, ratios, intervals, tests and models	Distinguish the qualitative null account from gaps in direct numerical results
7	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N07 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsHas a null long-term result been turned into exact zero, equivalence or exclusion of every benefit?Required	The selected note and counterview record a null full-cohort result and unverified durable benefit. R02	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Long-term question, intervals, comparison criteria and original interpretation	Distinguish a null finding from exclusion and equivalence
8	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N08 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsWhat are the definition and denominators of the long-term-benefit subgroup?Required	The long-term report states that only the long-term-benefit subgroup had significant results. R02	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Subgroup baseline status, duration, criteria, participants and denominators	Distinguish direct evidence for the full cohort from evidence for the precisely defined subgroup
9	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N09 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsDoes within-subgroup significance prove a full-cohort effect or interaction?Required	The original account describes a null full-cohort result and significance only in some long-term-benefit subgroup results. R02	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Prespecified subgroup plans, multiplicity, effect differences and interactions	Distinguish within-subgroup results from direct between-group differences
10	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N10 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsAre 12-month maintenance/restoration and the long-term full-cohort results the same endpoint?Required	At 12 months, maintenance/increase was 44.2% versus 37.2%, with an unadjusted 6.9-percentage-point difference (P=.015) and adjusted +6.2 percentage points (95% CI +0.5 to +11.8). The long-term account concerns income, work and months without benefits. R01 R02	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Time-specific classifications, data, estimands and populations	Separate direct short-term effects from estimates for each long-term endpoint
11	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N11 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsDoes the observed 18-month difference confirm long-term full-cohort benefit?Required	The original product-facts account records an observed +7.8-percentage-point difference at 18 months (P=.018) and explicitly leaves long-term full-cohort superiority unverified. R01 R02	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	18-month observations and 10-to-46-month extension models and denominators	Distinguish an observation time point from the scope of long-term analysis
12	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N12 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsHas zero 12-month follow-up loss been reused as complete long-term follow-up?Required	Complete register outcomes for 1,193 participants and loss of 0/1,193 are original information about the 12-month primary outcome. R02	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Long-term register linkage, observation, losses and endpoint-specific denominators	Present the actual scope of complete follow-up at each time point separately
13	Unverified	Full text not readStored summary read	N13 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsAre long-term register data and handling of missingness, movement and benefit status known?Required	The parent rationale describes monthly work and benefit status ascertained through national social-insurance and employment registers. R02	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Register definitions, linkage, missingness, status changes and measurement error	Distinguish objective ascertainment from actual processing limitations
14	Unverified	Full text not readStored summary read	N14 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsAre long-term estimands, covariates and statistical models verified?Required	Information that the long-term full-cohort result was not significant coexists with the original prespecified adjusted 12-month effect. R02	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Long-term analysis populations, models, adjustment, repeated data and periods	Distinguish short-term and long-term estimands and models
15	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N15 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsAre original allocation implementation and long-term selection/cross-exposure distinguished?Required	The original trial is described as a six-center pragmatic randomized trial with independent allocation, unmasked participants and register-based outcome ascertainment. R01 R02	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Allocation, follow-up selection, additional services, concomitant treatment and arm changes	Distinguish original allocation from limitations of actual long-term exposure/observation
16	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N16 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsHas the 5% treatment-participation figure been combined with long-term work denominators?Required	The original safety account describes 5% as stopping treatment/attending fewer than 3 AWaC sessions. R01 R02	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Attendance, stopping, reasons, timing and long-term register observation	Distinguish service participation from register-outcome follow-up
17	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N17 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsAre long-term full-cohort/subgroup plans distinct from the original primary-outcome plan?Required	The original primary outcome is objective work participation at 12 months, described as matching NCT01146730. The long-term report is an extension of the same trial. R01 R02 R03	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Protocol, SAP, registration history, long-term endpoints and hierarchy	Separate original primary-outcome plans from long-term and subgroup plans
18	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N18 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsHave long-term importance, clinical function and economic results been invented?Required	The follow-up citation concerns long-term income and sickness benefits; the preserved account records null full-cohort results for three outcomes. R02	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Definitions and importance of income, work and months without benefits, and other outcomes	Distinguish direct long-term endpoints from gaps in other outcomes and importance
19	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N19 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsAre three same-cohort citations, registration and sibling sheets independent replication?Required	The original evidence describes AWaC and the same-trial long-term report; the 3 citations comprise the original report, long-term report and registration. R01 R02 R03	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Links among original/long-term reports, registration, participants and repeated data	Distinguish report slots from actual trial and participant units
20	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N20 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsHas the result been extended to other services, populations or countries?Required	The evidence concerns the combined Norwegian AWaC service. The preserved summary describes different delivery systems and populations for verdict 2944 on physiotherapist vocational advice. R01 R02	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Direct data for each combined service, delivery system, population and institutional setting	Distinguish original related context from the selected long-term full-cohort question
21	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N21 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsHave long-term effects in excluded severe or high-risk populations been filled in?Required	The original material states that high suicide risk, severe mental illness and active substance use were excluded. R02	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Baseline risk, diagnosis, exclusions and long-term-subgroup eligibility	Distinguish long-term economic/benefit subgroups from populations defined by clinical risk
22	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N22 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsAre public funding, NAV operation and independent evaluation distinguished for long-term roles?Required	The original summary describes full funding by the Ministries of Health and Labour, NAV center operation and an evaluation team uninvolved in center operation or treatment. R01 R02	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Original/long-term funding, operation, evaluation and data-control disclosures	Record original support and long-term analytical roles separately
23	Unverified	Full text not readStored summary read	N23 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsHave long-term authorship, analysis, writing, publication and company involvement been verified?Required	The current preserved summary provides original public funding, operation/evaluation information and the long-term citation. R02	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Long-term disclosures, author relationships, analysis, writing, publication and data control	Distinguish reported support from unverified long-term roles
24	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N24 · Supplementary harm evidenceAre long-term work data equivalent to collection of clinical safety outcomes?Supplementary	The parent safety account states that prespecified safety endpoints and a serious-event comparison table were absent, leaving safety unknown. R01 R02	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Prespecified harms, event collection, arm denominators and clinical follow-up	Separate long-term work endpoints from clinical safety data
25	Unverified	Full text not readStored summary read	N25 · Supplementary harm evidenceAre long-term/rare harms and reasons for stopping separately verified?Supplementary	The original 5% attending fewer than 3 sessions and exclusion of high-risk participants provide limited information. R02	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Long-term exposure, events, stopping, other causes and rare outcomes	Distinguish participation/stopping from gaps in direct harm and causation
26	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N26 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsWere actual long-term reports and registration documents read?Required	The material read was the whole parent summary. Original/long-term PubMed and official NCT URLs are linked as originally cited. R01 R02 R03	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Citations, original URLs, preserved summary and abstract/full-text/registration/plan status	Show summary reading separately from each category of externally unread material
27	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N27 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsAre the long-term subclaim and parent Korean/English text, axes, dates and corrections distinguished?Required	The whole preserved summary retains Korean/English text, axes, the 2026-08-26 evidence date, empty corrections/deliberation and the long-term row. R01 R02 R03	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Whole parent original, long-term row, evidence date and corrections	Distinguish original verdict/corrections from the selected long-term context
28	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N28 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsAre the existing candidate, freezing/application and human review separated?Required	Only the existing selected unit is produced; claim and record references are distinguished. Candidate pending/eligible values are original history. R01 R02 R03	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Claim/record references, original candidate state and production events	Distinguish saved production from human content review and clinical certification

No items match your search or filter.

28 itemsWhat the statuses mean

Assessment scope

Stored-material review date: Not recorded
Original evidence cut-off: 2026-08-26
Scope actually checked: Existing review summaries and stored records of methodological application. Full papers, supplements, registrations, plans and original data were not read.
What the dates mean: This is the date the stored materials were checked, not the date of a new search of the clinical literature.
Population: 1,193 adults with anxiety/depression randomized at six Norwegian centers (630/563); high suicide risk, severe mental illness and active substance use excluded; exact long-term denominators separately unverified
Ingredient, formulation and route: Combined AWaC service with up to 15 sessions of work-focused CBT and individual job support
Dose: Original study-service exposure context, not treatment/job-support implementation instructions; actual participation and subsequent exposure details unverified
Comparator: Usual care; details of concomitant/additional treatments and arm-specific changes unread
Measured outcome: Full-cohort income, work participation and months without benefits over 10 to 46 months; separate from the long-term-benefit subgroup
Duration: Separate the original 12-month primary outcome, 18-month observations and 10-to-46-month extension results
Questions outside this scope: No new evidence, effects, CIs, calculations, verdicts, independence certification, participant totals, psychological treatment/job-support/drug changes or treatment instructions are created

Evidence and sources

The links below lead to the sources. A link alone does not mean the original source was read or its latest publication status verified.

R01 · Reme SE, et al. Occup Environ Med. 2015. PMID: 26251065.

PubMed

Material type: Stored summary of the original-trial paper citation
Materials actually read: Summary read; external abstracts, full texts, registration and plans unread
Findings recorded in the stored summary: The grade is B with 76 points. In AWaC, maintained/increased work participation at 12 months was 44.2% versus 37.2%, unadjusted difference 6.9 percentage points (P=.015), and prespecified covariate-adjusted marginal effect +6.2 percentage points (95% CI +0.5~+11.8).
Record level: AWaC objective 12-month work participation; original proportions/unadjusted/adjusted effects and complete register follow-up for the primary outcome
Study overlap and independent replication: Main/long-term AWaC reports and registration linked by the original stored summary; three citations, repeated monthly records, arms and sibling sheets are not totaled as new trials/participants

Public availability, access and reading status by material
Material	Public availability	Access status	Actually read	Notes
Stored summary	Summary read	Stored summary read	Summary read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry
External abstract	Not read	External material unread	Not read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry
External full text	Not read	External material unread	Not read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry
Original registration	Not read	External material unread	Not read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry
Protocol/SAP	Not read	External material unread	Not read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry

R02 · Long-term effects on income and sickness benefits after work-focused CBT and individual job support. PMID: 30032103.

PubMed

Material type: Stored summary of the same trial’s long-term paper citation
Materials actually read: Summary read; external abstracts, full texts, registration and plans unread
Findings recorded in the stored summary: The same-cohort 10~46-month extension found no significant full-cohort differences in income, work participation or months without benefits; only the long-term-benefit subgroup was significant. The established result concerns the full cohort at 12 months, not persistence of effect.
Record level: Same AWaC 10~46-month extension: null full-cohort results and long-term-benefit subgroup context; long-term denominators/original values unverified
Study overlap and independent replication: Main/long-term AWaC reports and registration linked by the original stored summary; three citations, repeated monthly records, arms and sibling sheets are not totaled as new trials/participants

Public availability, access and reading status by material
Material	Public availability	Access status	Actually read	Notes
Stored summary	Summary read	Stored summary read	Summary read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry
External abstract	Not read	External material unread	Not read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry
External full text	Not read	External material unread	Not read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry
Original registration	Not read	External material unread	Not read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry
Protocol/SAP	Not read	External material unread	Not read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry

R03 · NCT01146730. At Work and Coping.

Official source

Material type: Stored summary of the official registration citation
Materials actually read: Summary read; external abstracts, full texts, registration and plans unread
Findings recorded in the stored summary: Trial registration material.
Record level: Same AWaC registration citation; original planning text unread, not a new clinical results report
Study overlap and independent replication: Main/long-term AWaC reports and registration linked by the original stored summary; three citations, repeated monthly records, arms and sibling sheets are not totaled as new trials/participants

Public availability, access and reading status by material
Material	Public availability	Access status	Actually read	Notes
Stored summary	Summary read	Stored summary read	Summary read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry
External abstract	Not read	External material unread	Not read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry
External full text	Not read	External material unread	Not read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry
Original registration	Not read	External material unread	Not read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry
Protocol/SAP	Not read	External material unread	Not read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry

Report counts versus independent study counts

Main/long-term AWaC reports and registration linked by the original stored summary; three citations, repeated monthly records, arms and sibling sheets are not totaled as new trials/participants

Review criteria

Version 1.0 · Criteria record date 2026-10-06. These are Chamgap's own application conditions, informed by the referenced methods. They do not constitute official assessment-tool certification or a new efficacy score.

N01 · What are the original long-term full-cohort claim and subclaim verdict?

Required materials and conditions: Long-term full-cohort question, grade, note and parent context
Conditions for verification: Long-term full-cohort question, grade, note and parent context; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N02 · Which recruitment and analysis populations does the long-term full cohort refer to?

Required materials and conditions: Original allocation, extension eligibility, full cohort, subgroups and denominators
Conditions for verification: Original allocation, extension eligibility, full cohort, subgroups and denominators; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N03 · Is the 10-to-46-month observation window the same as the original program duration?

Required materials and conditions: Extension time points, duration, observation window, termination and exposure
Conditions for verification: Extension time points, duration, observation window, termination and exposure; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N04 · Are the original combined service and usual care preserved accurately?

Required materials and conditions: Specifications of CBT, job support, usual care and additional management
Conditions for verification: Specifications of CBT, job support, usual care and additional management; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N05 · Are long-term income, work participation and months without benefits separate outcomes?

Required materials and conditions: Definitions, units, aggregation and periods for each long-term endpoint
Conditions for verification: Definitions, units, aggregation and periods for each long-term endpoint; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N06 · Are long-term full-cohort effect estimates, CIs and P values provided?

Required materials and conditions: Endpoint-specific direct differences, ratios, intervals, tests and models
Conditions for verification: Endpoint-specific direct differences, ratios, intervals, tests and models; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N07 · Has a null long-term result been turned into exact zero, equivalence or exclusion of every benefit?

Required materials and conditions: Long-term question, intervals, comparison criteria and original interpretation
Conditions for verification: Long-term question, intervals, comparison criteria and original interpretation; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N08 · What are the definition and denominators of the long-term-benefit subgroup?

Required materials and conditions: Subgroup baseline status, duration, criteria, participants and denominators
Conditions for verification: Subgroup baseline status, duration, criteria, participants and denominators; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N09 · Does within-subgroup significance prove a full-cohort effect or interaction?

Required materials and conditions: Prespecified subgroup plans, multiplicity, effect differences and interactions
Conditions for verification: Prespecified subgroup plans, multiplicity, effect differences and interactions; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N10 · Are 12-month maintenance/restoration and the long-term full-cohort results the same endpoint?

Required materials and conditions: Time-specific classifications, data, estimands and populations
Conditions for verification: Time-specific classifications, data, estimands and populations; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N11 · Does the observed 18-month difference confirm long-term full-cohort benefit?

Required materials and conditions: 18-month observations and 10-to-46-month extension models and denominators
Conditions for verification: 18-month observations and 10-to-46-month extension models and denominators; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N12 · Has zero 12-month follow-up loss been reused as complete long-term follow-up?

Required materials and conditions: Long-term register linkage, observation, losses and endpoint-specific denominators
Conditions for verification: Long-term register linkage, observation, losses and endpoint-specific denominators; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N13 · Are long-term register data and handling of missingness, movement and benefit status known?

Required materials and conditions: Register definitions, linkage, missingness, status changes and measurement error
Conditions for verification: Register definitions, linkage, missingness, status changes and measurement error; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N14 · Are long-term estimands, covariates and statistical models verified?

Required materials and conditions: Long-term analysis populations, models, adjustment, repeated data and periods
Conditions for verification: Long-term analysis populations, models, adjustment, repeated data and periods; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N15 · Are original allocation implementation and long-term selection/cross-exposure distinguished?

Required materials and conditions: Allocation, follow-up selection, additional services, concomitant treatment and arm changes
Conditions for verification: Allocation, follow-up selection, additional services, concomitant treatment and arm changes; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N16 · Has the 5% treatment-participation figure been combined with long-term work denominators?

Required materials and conditions: Attendance, stopping, reasons, timing and long-term register observation
Conditions for verification: Attendance, stopping, reasons, timing and long-term register observation; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N17 · Are long-term full-cohort/subgroup plans distinct from the original primary-outcome plan?

Required materials and conditions: Protocol, SAP, registration history, long-term endpoints and hierarchy
Conditions for verification: Protocol, SAP, registration history, long-term endpoints and hierarchy; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N18 · Have long-term importance, clinical function and economic results been invented?

Required materials and conditions: Definitions and importance of income, work and months without benefits, and other outcomes
Conditions for verification: Definitions and importance of income, work and months without benefits, and other outcomes; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N19 · Are three same-cohort citations, registration and sibling sheets independent replication?

Required materials and conditions: Links among original/long-term reports, registration, participants and repeated data
Conditions for verification: Links among original/long-term reports, registration, participants and repeated data; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N20 · Has the result been extended to other services, populations or countries?

Required materials and conditions: Direct data for each combined service, delivery system, population and institutional setting
Conditions for verification: Direct data for each combined service, delivery system, population and institutional setting; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N21 · Have long-term effects in excluded severe or high-risk populations been filled in?

Required materials and conditions: Baseline risk, diagnosis, exclusions and long-term-subgroup eligibility
Conditions for verification: Baseline risk, diagnosis, exclusions and long-term-subgroup eligibility; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N22 · Are public funding, NAV operation and independent evaluation distinguished for long-term roles?

Required materials and conditions: Original/long-term funding, operation, evaluation and data-control disclosures
Conditions for verification: Original/long-term funding, operation, evaluation and data-control disclosures; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N23 · Have long-term authorship, analysis, writing, publication and company involvement been verified?

Required materials and conditions: Long-term disclosures, author relationships, analysis, writing, publication and data control
Conditions for verification: Long-term disclosures, author relationships, analysis, writing, publication and data control; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N24 · Are long-term work data equivalent to collection of clinical safety outcomes?

Required materials and conditions: Prespecified harms, event collection, arm denominators and clinical follow-up
Conditions for verification: Prespecified harms, event collection, arm denominators and clinical follow-up; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Supplementary
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Supplementary condition revealing harm collection, exposure and population scope separately from efficacy
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N25 · Are long-term/rare harms and reasons for stopping separately verified?

Required materials and conditions: Long-term exposure, events, stopping, other causes and rare outcomes
Conditions for verification: Long-term exposure, events, stopping, other causes and rare outcomes; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Supplementary
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Supplementary condition revealing harm collection, exposure and population scope separately from efficacy
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N26 · Were actual long-term reports and registration documents read?

Required materials and conditions: Citations, original URLs, preserved summary and abstract/full-text/registration/plan status
Conditions for verification: Citations, original URLs, preserved summary and abstract/full-text/registration/plan status; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N27 · Are the long-term subclaim and parent Korean/English text, axes, dates and corrections distinguished?

Required materials and conditions: Whole parent original, long-term row, evidence date and corrections
Conditions for verification: Whole parent original, long-term row, evidence date and corrections; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N28 · Are the existing candidate, freezing/application and human review separated?

Required materials and conditions: Claim/record references, original candidate state and production events
Conditions for verification: Claim/record references, original candidate state and production events; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Referenced methods and the sections actually reviewed

M03 · Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08

Official methodology · §3.1, §3.2.1–3.2.3, MECIR C5/C7/C13

Referenced principle: Clearly record the question, eligibility conditions and reasons for changes, and distinguish variations in interventions.
Extent of review: Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited

M04 · Cochrane Handbook 6.5.1 (2025), chapter updated 2025-03

Official methodology · §4.5, §4.6.1–4.6.3, MECIR C42

Referenced principle: Distinguish studies from reports and link them; do not omit a study solely because results are unreported.
Extent of review: Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited

M08 · Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10

Official methodology · §8.1–8.2.3, Table 8.2.a

Referenced principle: Define the outcome and effect of interest, then examine randomization, deviations, missing data, measurement and selective reporting.
Extent of review: Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited

M15 · Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08

Official methodology · §15.2.4, §15.3.1–15.3.3

Referenced principle: Distinguish effect estimates, intervals, importance and applicability. Sample size alone does not determine precision.
Extent of review: Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited

M19 · Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10

Official methodology · §19.1.2, §19.2.1–19.2.4

Referenced principle: Harm questions may require different designs, populations and follow-up from efficacy questions. Case reports do not establish incidence rates.
Extent of review: Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited

What the statuses mean

Partly verified: Some information exists in the preserved review summary; detailed original materials remain unverified. This does not certify a passed review or clinical efficacy.
Unverified: Detailed materials for the selected condition could not be established within the stored scope; this does not mean zero effect, zero studies or safety
Review incomplete: Review of existing content incomplete
Met: Use only within the relevant conditions after existing content review; no automatic designation in this preparation
Not reported: Distinguish only within materials actually read; do not turn unread external materials into unreported findings
Inaccessible: Not applied during this preparation because actual access was not tested
Not applicable: Use with a reason for non-applicability based on an explicit question boundary
Conflicting data: Judge after actual material comparison; review was not performed during this preparation
Insufficient evidence for the conditions: Do not use as a clinical grade encompassing currently unread materials

Change history

2026-10-12 · Public page/material version 1.0

Public reader pages and material were prepared from the existing 28 items. No new clinical searches, verification-state changes or scoring were performed.

The stored-material review date (Not recorded) and original evidence cut-off (2026-08-26) were retained unchanged.

Researcher downloads

These materials provide the same evidence, scope and verification status as this page.

View all item details

N01 · What are the original long-term full-cohort claim and subclaim verdict?

Current findings: The selected row concerns the long-term full-cohort effect, carries original grade D and notes a null full-cohort extension over 10 to 46 months. The parent concerns 12 months, grade B with 76 points.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: The selected row has no score, status or axes. Do not fill these with the parent B, 76 points or E+, or treat them as long-term effects.
Required materials and conditions: Long-term full-cohort question, grade, note and parent context
Materials to obtain first: Selected row and original parent verdict
Further research: Distinguish the original long-term verdict from the 12-month context
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Long-term full-cohort question, grade, note and parent context; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R02

N02 · Which recruitment and analysis populations does the long-term full cohort refer to?

Current findings: The original trial randomized 1,193 adults with anxiety/depression (630/563); the extension analyzes the same cohort.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Exact long-term analysis/follow-up denominators and eligibility details are absent from the summary. Do not certify the randomized total as the long-term observed or analyzed denominator.
Required materials and conditions: Original allocation, extension eligibility, full cohort, subgroups and denominators
Materials to obtain first: Long-term full-cohort participant flow, eligibility and analysis tables
Further research: Present original allocation, long-term observations, analysis and subgroups separately
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Original allocation, extension eligibility, full cohort, subgroups and denominators; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01 R02

N03 · Is the 10-to-46-month observation window the same as the original program duration?

Current findings: The long-term report covers an extension over 10 to 46 months. The original combined service included up to 15 CBT sessions and individual job support.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not describe 10 to 46 months as continuous treatment or an exact interval since treatment ended. Individual exposure and follow-up-window details remain unverified.
Required materials and conditions: Extension time points, duration, observation window, termination and exposure
Materials to obtain first: Extension observation windows, original treatment duration and additional exposure data
Further research: Distinguish treatment exposure from observation duration
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Extension time points, duration, observation window, termination and exposure; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01 R02

N04 · Are the original combined service and usual care preserved accurately?

Current findings: The original allocation comparison was combined AWaC work-focused CBT and individual job support versus usual care.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not convert this into CBT alone, job support alone or a no-treatment comparison. Long-term usual-care/additional-service details are unread; do not write treatment implementation instructions.
Required materials and conditions: Specifications of CBT, job support, usual care and additional management
Materials to obtain first: Original/additional services and arm-specific usual-care data
Further research: Show the scope of combined-service assignment and subsequent exposure
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Specifications of CBT, job support, usual care and additional management; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01 R02

N05 · Are long-term income, work participation and months without benefits separate outcomes?

Current findings: The preserved counterview states that full-cohort differences in income, work participation and months without benefits were not significant.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not combine the three endpoints into one score or equate work, benefits and income. Detailed definitions, units and measurement windows are unread.
Required materials and conditions: Definitions, units, aggregation and periods for each long-term endpoint
Materials to obtain first: Long-term endpoint definitions, data and original result tables
Further research: Present income, work and periods without benefits separately
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Definitions, units, aggregation and periods for each long-term endpoint; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R02

N06 · Are long-term full-cohort effect estimates, CIs and P values provided?

Current findings: The preserved long-term account provides qualitative information that full-cohort differences in the three outcomes were not significant.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Exact long-term full-cohort effects, CIs and P values are absent from the summary. Do not copy the 12-month +6.2 percentage points or 18-month +7.8 percentage points as long-term estimates.
Required materials and conditions: Endpoint-specific direct differences, ratios, intervals, tests and models
Materials to obtain first: Original long-term endpoint effect, interval and P-value tables
Further research: Distinguish the qualitative null account from gaps in direct numerical results
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Endpoint-specific direct differences, ratios, intervals, tests and models; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R02

N07 · Has a null long-term result been turned into exact zero, equivalence or exclusion of every benefit?

Current findings: The selected note and counterview record a null full-cohort result and unverified durable benefit.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: This does not certify an exactly zero effect, exclusion of all meaningful benefit or equivalence to the comparator. Prespecified long-term important-difference/equivalence criteria are also unverified.
Required materials and conditions: Long-term question, intervals, comparison criteria and original interpretation
Materials to obtain first: Original long-term analyses, importance and comparison criteria
Further research: Distinguish a null finding from exclusion and equivalence
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Long-term question, intervals, comparison criteria and original interpretation; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R02

N08 · What are the definition and denominators of the long-term-benefit subgroup?

Current findings: The long-term report states that only the long-term-benefit subgroup had significant results.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Benefit types, the long-term criterion, subgroup counts, arm denominators and effects/CIs/P values are unverified. Do not invent criteria or values.
Required materials and conditions: Subgroup baseline status, duration, criteria, participants and denominators
Materials to obtain first: Subgroup definitions, baseline data, denominators and original effect tables
Further research: Distinguish direct evidence for the full cohort from evidence for the precisely defined subgroup
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Subgroup baseline status, duration, criteria, participants and denominators; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R02

N09 · Does within-subgroup significance prove a full-cohort effect or interaction?

Current findings: The original account describes a null full-cohort result and significance only in some long-term-benefit subgroup results.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: A subgroup signal does not establish full-cohort superiority or between-subgroup differences/interactions. Plans, tests and multiplicity are unread.
Required materials and conditions: Prespecified subgroup plans, multiplicity, effect differences and interactions
Materials to obtain first: Original subgroup plans, multiplicity and interaction data
Further research: Distinguish within-subgroup results from direct between-group differences
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Prespecified subgroup plans, multiplicity, effect differences and interactions; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R02

N10 · Are 12-month maintenance/restoration and the long-term full-cohort results the same endpoint?

Current findings: At 12 months, maintenance/increase was 44.2% versus 37.2%, with an unadjusted 6.9-percentage-point difference (P=.015) and adjusted +6.2 percentage points (95% CI +0.5 to +11.8). The long-term account concerns income, work and months without benefits.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not transfer short-term classifications, unadjusted/adjusted estimates or denominators to other long-term outcomes. Do not calculate sustained-maintenance or relapse/return-to-work rates.
Required materials and conditions: Time-specific classifications, data, estimands and populations
Materials to obtain first: Original time-specific work classifications, denominators and effect tables
Further research: Separate direct short-term effects from estimates for each long-term endpoint
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Time-specific classifications, data, estimands and populations; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01 R02

N11 · Does the observed 18-month difference confirm long-term full-cohort benefit?

Current findings: The original product-facts account records an observed +7.8-percentage-point difference at 18 months (P=.018) and explicitly leaves long-term full-cohort superiority unverified.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: The 18-month CI, denominators and adjustment details are absent. Do not promote a single-time-point difference to a whole-period long-term effect or independent replication.
Required materials and conditions: 18-month observations and 10-to-46-month extension models and denominators
Materials to obtain first: 18-month and long-term models, denominators and interval data
Further research: Distinguish an observation time point from the scope of long-term analysis
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: 18-month observations and 10-to-46-month extension models and denominators; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01 R02

N12 · Has zero 12-month follow-up loss been reused as complete long-term follow-up?

Current findings: Complete register outcomes for 1,193 participants and loss of 0/1,193 are original information about the 12-month primary outcome.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Sharing a cohort does not certify zero data loss for every long-term endpoint and period. Long-term denominator details are unread.
Required materials and conditions: Long-term register linkage, observation, losses and endpoint-specific denominators
Materials to obtain first: Long-term endpoint observations, register linkage and analysis denominators
Further research: Present the actual scope of complete follow-up at each time point separately
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Long-term register linkage, observation, losses and endpoint-specific denominators; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R02

N13 · Are long-term register data and handling of missingness, movement and benefit status known?

Current findings: The parent rationale describes monthly work and benefit status ascertained through national social-insurance and employment registers.
Verification status: Unverified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Long-term missingness, movement, data errors, benefit-classification changes and processing methods are absent from the summary. Objective data do not establish absence of every error.
Required materials and conditions: Register definitions, linkage, missingness, status changes and measurement error
Materials to obtain first: Original long-term register-processing, error and missingness specifications
Further research: Distinguish objective ascertainment from actual processing limitations
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Register definitions, linkage, missingness, status changes and measurement error; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R02

N14 · Are long-term estimands, covariates and statistical models verified?

Current findings: Information that the long-term full-cohort result was not significant coexists with the original prespecified adjusted 12-month effect.
Verification status: Unverified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not automatically apply 12-month models/prespecified covariates to the long-term analysis or label it an effect of all observations or actual participation. Long-term model details are unread.
Required materials and conditions: Long-term analysis populations, models, adjustment, repeated data and periods
Materials to obtain first: Long-term models, covariates, repeated-data handling and analysis populations
Further research: Distinguish short-term and long-term estimands and models
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Long-term analysis populations, models, adjustment, repeated data and periods; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R02

N15 · Are original allocation implementation and long-term selection/cross-exposure distinguished?

Current findings: The original trial is described as a six-center pragmatic randomized trial with independent allocation, unmasked participants and register-based outcome ascertainment.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not make the extension a new randomized trial. Details of follow-up selection, additional services, arm changes and concomitant exposure remain unverified.
Required materials and conditions: Allocation, follow-up selection, additional services, concomitant treatment and arm changes
Materials to obtain first: Original long-term participation, exposure changes, services and register data
Further research: Distinguish original allocation from limitations of actual long-term exposure/observation
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Allocation, follow-up selection, additional services, concomitant treatment and arm changes; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01 R02

N16 · Has the 5% treatment-participation figure been combined with long-term work denominators?

Current findings: The original safety account describes 5% as stopping treatment/attending fewer than 3 AWaC sessions.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not convert 5% to long-term loss, harm incidence or a denominator for all work outcomes, or calculate counts using the randomized total. Long-term participation/exposure denominators are separate.
Required materials and conditions: Attendance, stopping, reasons, timing and long-term register observation
Materials to obtain first: Treatment attendance/stopping and long-term data flow
Further research: Distinguish service participation from register-outcome follow-up
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Attendance, stopping, reasons, timing and long-term register observation; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01 R02

N17 · Are long-term full-cohort/subgroup plans distinct from the original primary-outcome plan?

Current findings: The original primary outcome is objective work participation at 12 months, described as matching NCT01146730. The long-term report is an extension of the same trial.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not reuse original primary-outcome prespecification as certification of long-term endpoints or subgroup plans. Long-term plans, changes and multiplicity remain externally unread.
Required materials and conditions: Protocol, SAP, registration history, long-term endpoints and hierarchy
Materials to obtain first: Registration, long-term plans, SAP and amendment documents
Further research: Separate original primary-outcome plans from long-term and subgroup plans
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Protocol, SAP, registration history, long-term endpoints and hierarchy; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01 R02 R03

N18 · Have long-term importance, clinical function and economic results been invented?

Current findings: The follow-up citation concerns long-term income and sickness benefits; the preserved account records null full-cohort results for three outcomes.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not create new effects, economic costs, quality-of-life outcomes, symptom remission, individual examples or clinical minimum thresholds. Direct data for each outcome are separately needed.
Required materials and conditions: Definitions and importance of income, work and months without benefits, and other outcomes
Materials to obtain first: Original long-term work, economic and clinical-function results
Further research: Distinguish direct long-term endpoints from gaps in other outcomes and importance
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Definitions and importance of income, work and months without benefits, and other outcomes; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R02

N19 · Are three same-cohort citations, registration and sibling sheets independent replication?

Current findings: The original evidence describes AWaC and the same-trial long-term report; the 3 citations comprise the original report, long-term report and registration.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not sum 3 reports, sibling sheets, monthly data, centers or arms as new independent trials or participants. Confirmed trial/participant counts are unrecorded.
Required materials and conditions: Links among original/long-term reports, registration, participants and repeated data
Materials to obtain first: Original/long-term report, registration and participant-linkage data
Further research: Distinguish report slots from actual trial and participant units
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Links among original/long-term reports, registration, participants and repeated data; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01 R02 R03

N20 · Has the result been extended to other services, populations or countries?

Current findings: The evidence concerns the combined Norwegian AWaC service. The preserved summary describes different delivery systems and populations for verdict 2944 on physiotherapist vocational advice.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Related verdicts/links have not been newly read or checked. Do not turn the long-term null result into a null result for every CBT, job-support or vocational-advice service.
Required materials and conditions: Direct data for each combined service, delivery system, population and institutional setting
Materials to obtain first: Direct comparative data for services, institutions and populations
Further research: Distinguish original related context from the selected long-term full-cohort question
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Direct data for each combined service, delivery system, population and institutional setting; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01 R02

N21 · Have long-term effects in excluded severe or high-risk populations been filled in?

Current findings: The original material states that high suicide risk, severe mental illness and active substance use were excluded.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not certify long-term effects, safety or treatment suitability in excluded populations. Do not equate the long-term-benefit subgroup with a severe-mental-illness population.
Required materials and conditions: Baseline risk, diagnosis, exclusions and long-term-subgroup eligibility
Materials to obtain first: Original baseline, exclusion and long-term-subgroup eligibility data
Further research: Distinguish long-term economic/benefit subgroups from populations defined by clinical risk
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Baseline risk, diagnosis, exclusions and long-term-subgroup eligibility; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R02

N22 · Are public funding, NAV operation and independent evaluation distinguished for long-term roles?

Current findings: The original summary describes full funding by the Ministries of Health and Labour, NAV center operation and an evaluation team uninvolved in center operation or treatment.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not convert the original evaluation role into new certification of independence for every long-term analysis, data process or publication. Separate long-term disclosures are unread.
Required materials and conditions: Original/long-term funding, operation, evaluation and data-control disclosures
Materials to obtain first: Original/long-term funding, operation, evaluation and authority disclosures
Further research: Record original support and long-term analytical roles separately
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Original/long-term funding, operation, evaluation and data-control disclosures; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01 R02

N23 · Have long-term authorship, analysis, writing, publication and company involvement been verified?

Current findings: The current preserved summary provides original public funding, operation/evaluation information and the long-term citation.
Verification status: Unverified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not certify that unmentioned long-term author relationships, outsourced analysis, medical writing, publication fees or other company involvement are all absent.
Required materials and conditions: Long-term disclosures, author relationships, analysis, writing, publication and data control
Materials to obtain first: Long-term disclosures, contributions and data/publication authority
Further research: Distinguish reported support from unverified long-term roles
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Long-term disclosures, author relationships, analysis, writing, publication and data control; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R02

N24 · Are long-term work data equivalent to collection of clinical safety outcomes?

Current findings: The parent safety account states that prespecified safety endpoints and a serious-event comparison table were absent, leaving safety unknown.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Having long-term work registers does not establish complete clinical-harm collection, no events or equivalence to the comparator.
Required materials and conditions: Prespecified harms, event collection, arm denominators and clinical follow-up
Materials to obtain first: Long-term arm-specific harms, collection and exposure data
Further research: Separate long-term work endpoints from clinical safety data
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Prespecified harms, event collection, arm denominators and clinical follow-up; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Supplementary condition revealing harm collection, exposure and population scope separately from efficacy
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01 R02

N25 · Are long-term/rare harms and reasons for stopping separately verified?

Current findings: The original 5% attending fewer than 3 sessions and exclusion of high-risk participants provide limited information.
Verification status: Unverified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not automatically classify stopping as harm or efficacy failure, or infer absence of long-term/rare harms. Do not create treatment implementation/change guidance.
Required materials and conditions: Long-term exposure, events, stopping, other causes and rare outcomes
Materials to obtain first: Long-term stopping, reasons, events and exposure follow-up
Further research: Distinguish participation/stopping from gaps in direct harm and causation
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Long-term exposure, events, stopping, other causes and rare outcomes; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Supplementary condition revealing harm collection, exposure and population scope separately from efficacy
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R02

N26 · Were actual long-term reports and registration documents read?

Current findings: The material read was the whole parent summary. Original/long-term PubMed and official NCT URLs are linked as originally cited.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP were not read; links/screens were not checked clinically. URL presence does not establish external reading or clinical QA.
Required materials and conditions: Citations, original URLs, preserved summary and abstract/full-text/registration/plan status
Materials to obtain first: Original/long-term reports, registration and plan materials
Further research: Show summary reading separately from each category of externally unread material
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Citations, original URLs, preserved summary and abstract/full-text/registration/plan status; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01 R02 R03

N27 · Are the long-term subclaim and parent Korean/English text, axes, dates and corrections distinguished?

Current findings: The whole preserved summary retains Korean/English text, axes, the 2026-08-26 evidence date, empty corrections/deliberation and the long-term row.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not fill the long-term row’s missing score, status or axes with parent B and 76 points. Do not replace the original evidence date with the current review date.
Required materials and conditions: Whole parent original, long-term row, evidence date and corrections
Materials to obtain first: Original preserved summary and subclaim/parent history
Further research: Distinguish original verdict/corrections from the selected long-term context
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Whole parent original, long-term row, evidence date and corrections; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01 R02 R03

N28 · Are the existing candidate, freezing/application and human review separated?

Current findings: Only the existing selected unit is produced; claim and record references are distinguished. Candidate pending/eligible values are original history.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not activate a review wait. Preserve incomplete original review, false completion flags, 0 new units and unrecorded final independent counts. Do not create new effects, verdicts or treatment instructions.
Required materials and conditions: Claim/record references, original candidate state and production events
Materials to obtain first: Existing selection and condition-freezing/application events
Further research: Distinguish saved production from human content review and clinical certification
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Claim/record references, original candidate state and production events; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01 R02 R03