{
  "schema_version": "chamgap-public-criteria-1.0",
  "title": "Work-focused CBT and job support × Durable benefit in the full cohort — Evidence Check",
  "language": "en",
  "translation_date": "2026-10-12",
  "criteria_version": "1.0",
  "criteria_date": "2026-10-06",
  "condition_origin": "Chamgap's own application conditions",
  "method_sources": [
    {
      "id": "M03",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-03",
      "section": "§3.1, §3.2.1–3.2.3, MECIR C5/C7/C13",
      "official_principle": "Clearly record the question, eligibility conditions and reasons for changes, and distinguish variations in interventions.",
      "review_level": "Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited"
    },
    {
      "id": "M04",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5.1 (2025), chapter updated 2025-03",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-04",
      "section": "§4.5, §4.6.1–4.6.3, MECIR C42",
      "official_principle": "Distinguish studies from reports and link them; do not omit a study solely because results are unreported.",
      "review_level": "Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited"
    },
    {
      "id": "M08",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-08",
      "section": "§8.1–8.2.3, Table 8.2.a",
      "official_principle": "Define the outcome and effect of interest, then examine randomization, deviations, missing data, measurement and selective reporting.",
      "review_level": "Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited"
    },
    {
      "id": "M15",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-15",
      "section": "§15.2.4, §15.3.1–15.3.3",
      "official_principle": "Distinguish effect estimates, intervals, importance and applicability. Sample size alone does not determine precision.",
      "review_level": "Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited"
    },
    {
      "id": "M19",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-19",
      "section": "§19.1.2, §19.2.1–19.2.4",
      "official_principle": "Harm questions may require different designs, populations and follow-up from efficacy questions. Case reports do not establish incidence rates.",
      "review_level": "Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited"
    }
  ],
  "status_dictionary": {
    "Partly verified": "Some information exists in the preserved review summary; detailed original materials remain unverified. This does not certify a passed review or clinical efficacy.",
    "Unverified": "Detailed materials for the selected condition could not be established within the stored scope; this does not mean zero effect, zero studies or safety",
    "Review incomplete": "Review of existing content incomplete",
    "Met": "Use only within the relevant conditions after existing content review; no automatic designation in this preparation",
    "Not reported": "Distinguish only within materials actually read; do not turn unread external materials into unreported findings",
    "Inaccessible": "Not applied during this preparation because actual access was not tested",
    "Not applicable": "Use with a reason for non-applicability based on an explicit question boundary",
    "Conflicting data": "Judge after actual material comparison; review was not performed during this preparation",
    "Insufficient evidence for the conditions": "Do not use as a clinical grade encompassing currently unread materials"
  },
  "requirements": [
    {
      "item_id": "N01",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "What are the original long-term full-cohort claim and subclaim verdict?",
      "needed": "Long-term full-cohort question, grade, note and parent context",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Long-term full-cohort question, grade, note and parent context; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish the original long-term verdict from the 12-month context"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N02",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Which recruitment and analysis populations does the long-term full cohort refer to?",
      "needed": "Original allocation, extension eligibility, full cohort, subgroups and denominators",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Original allocation, extension eligibility, full cohort, subgroups and denominators; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Present original allocation, long-term observations, analysis and subgroups separately"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N03",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Is the 10-to-46-month observation window the same as the original program duration?",
      "needed": "Extension time points, duration, observation window, termination and exposure",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Extension time points, duration, observation window, termination and exposure; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish treatment exposure from observation duration"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N04",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Are the original combined service and usual care preserved accurately?",
      "needed": "Specifications of CBT, job support, usual care and additional management",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Specifications of CBT, job support, usual care and additional management; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Show the scope of combined-service assignment and subsequent exposure"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N05",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Are long-term income, work participation and months without benefits separate outcomes?",
      "needed": "Definitions, units, aggregation and periods for each long-term endpoint",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Definitions, units, aggregation and periods for each long-term endpoint; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Present income, work and periods without benefits separately"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N06",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Are long-term full-cohort effect estimates, CIs and P values provided?",
      "needed": "Endpoint-specific direct differences, ratios, intervals, tests and models",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Endpoint-specific direct differences, ratios, intervals, tests and models; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish the qualitative null account from gaps in direct numerical results"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N07",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Has a null long-term result been turned into exact zero, equivalence or exclusion of every benefit?",
      "needed": "Long-term question, intervals, comparison criteria and original interpretation",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Long-term question, intervals, comparison criteria and original interpretation; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish a null finding from exclusion and equivalence"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N08",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "What are the definition and denominators of the long-term-benefit subgroup?",
      "needed": "Subgroup baseline status, duration, criteria, participants and denominators",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Subgroup baseline status, duration, criteria, participants and denominators; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish direct evidence for the full cohort from evidence for the precisely defined subgroup"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N09",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Does within-subgroup significance prove a full-cohort effect or interaction?",
      "needed": "Prespecified subgroup plans, multiplicity, effect differences and interactions",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Prespecified subgroup plans, multiplicity, effect differences and interactions; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish within-subgroup results from direct between-group differences"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N10",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Are 12-month maintenance/restoration and the long-term full-cohort results the same endpoint?",
      "needed": "Time-specific classifications, data, estimands and populations",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Time-specific classifications, data, estimands and populations; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Separate direct short-term effects from estimates for each long-term endpoint"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N11",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Does the observed 18-month difference confirm long-term full-cohort benefit?",
      "needed": "18-month observations and 10-to-46-month extension models and denominators",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "18-month observations and 10-to-46-month extension models and denominators; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish an observation time point from the scope of long-term analysis"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N12",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Has zero 12-month follow-up loss been reused as complete long-term follow-up?",
      "needed": "Long-term register linkage, observation, losses and endpoint-specific denominators",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Long-term register linkage, observation, losses and endpoint-specific denominators; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Present the actual scope of complete follow-up at each time point separately"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N13",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Are long-term register data and handling of missingness, movement and benefit status known?",
      "needed": "Register definitions, linkage, missingness, status changes and measurement error",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Register definitions, linkage, missingness, status changes and measurement error; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish objective ascertainment from actual processing limitations"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N14",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Are long-term estimands, covariates and statistical models verified?",
      "needed": "Long-term analysis populations, models, adjustment, repeated data and periods",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Long-term analysis populations, models, adjustment, repeated data and periods; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish short-term and long-term estimands and models"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N15",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Are original allocation implementation and long-term selection/cross-exposure distinguished?",
      "needed": "Allocation, follow-up selection, additional services, concomitant treatment and arm changes",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Allocation, follow-up selection, additional services, concomitant treatment and arm changes; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish original allocation from limitations of actual long-term exposure/observation"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N16",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Has the 5% treatment-participation figure been combined with long-term work denominators?",
      "needed": "Attendance, stopping, reasons, timing and long-term register observation",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Attendance, stopping, reasons, timing and long-term register observation; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish service participation from register-outcome follow-up"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N17",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Are long-term full-cohort/subgroup plans distinct from the original primary-outcome plan?",
      "needed": "Protocol, SAP, registration history, long-term endpoints and hierarchy",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Protocol, SAP, registration history, long-term endpoints and hierarchy; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Separate original primary-outcome plans from long-term and subgroup plans"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N18",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Have long-term importance, clinical function and economic results been invented?",
      "needed": "Definitions and importance of income, work and months without benefits, and other outcomes",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Definitions and importance of income, work and months without benefits, and other outcomes; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish direct long-term endpoints from gaps in other outcomes and importance"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N19",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Are three same-cohort citations, registration and sibling sheets independent replication?",
      "needed": "Links among original/long-term reports, registration, participants and repeated data",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Links among original/long-term reports, registration, participants and repeated data; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish report slots from actual trial and participant units"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N20",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Has the result been extended to other services, populations or countries?",
      "needed": "Direct data for each combined service, delivery system, population and institutional setting",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Direct data for each combined service, delivery system, population and institutional setting; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish original related context from the selected long-term full-cohort question"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N21",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Have long-term effects in excluded severe or high-risk populations been filled in?",
      "needed": "Baseline risk, diagnosis, exclusions and long-term-subgroup eligibility",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Baseline risk, diagnosis, exclusions and long-term-subgroup eligibility; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish long-term economic/benefit subgroups from populations defined by clinical risk"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N22",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Are public funding, NAV operation and independent evaluation distinguished for long-term roles?",
      "needed": "Original/long-term funding, operation, evaluation and data-control disclosures",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Original/long-term funding, operation, evaluation and data-control disclosures; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Record original support and long-term analytical roles separately"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N23",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Have long-term authorship, analysis, writing, publication and company involvement been verified?",
      "needed": "Long-term disclosures, author relationships, analysis, writing, publication and data control",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Long-term disclosures, author relationships, analysis, writing, publication and data control; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish reported support from unverified long-term roles"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N24",
      "question_type": "Supplementary harm evidence",
      "question": "Are long-term work data equivalent to collection of clinical safety outcomes?",
      "needed": "Prespecified harms, event collection, arm denominators and clinical follow-up",
      "role": "Supplementary",
      "role_reason": "Supplementary condition revealing harm collection, exposure and population scope separately from efficacy",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Prespecified harms, event collection, arm denominators and clinical follow-up; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Separate long-term work endpoints from clinical safety data"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N25",
      "question_type": "Supplementary harm evidence",
      "question": "Are long-term/rare harms and reasons for stopping separately verified?",
      "needed": "Long-term exposure, events, stopping, other causes and rare outcomes",
      "role": "Supplementary",
      "role_reason": "Supplementary condition revealing harm collection, exposure and population scope separately from efficacy",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Long-term exposure, events, stopping, other causes and rare outcomes; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish participation/stopping from gaps in direct harm and causation"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N26",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Were actual long-term reports and registration documents read?",
      "needed": "Citations, original URLs, preserved summary and abstract/full-text/registration/plan status",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Citations, original URLs, preserved summary and abstract/full-text/registration/plan status; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Show summary reading separately from each category of externally unread material"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N27",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Are the long-term subclaim and parent Korean/English text, axes, dates and corrections distinguished?",
      "needed": "Whole parent original, long-term row, evidence date and corrections",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Whole parent original, long-term row, evidence date and corrections; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish original verdict/corrections from the selected long-term context"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N28",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Are the existing candidate, freezing/application and human review separated?",
      "needed": "Claim/record references, original candidate state and production events",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Claim/record references, original candidate state and production events; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish saved production from human content review and clinical certification"
    }
  ]
}