Work-focused CBT and job support × Work participation at 12 months — Evidence Check

Required evidence, verification status and materials actually read
Item	AVerification status	BReading scope	CReview item	DCurrent findings	EWhy unverified	FRequired materials and conditions	GFurther research
1	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N01 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsWhat are the selected 12-month question and original subclaim verdict?Required	The selected stored wording is maintained or restored work participation at 12 months, original grade B, with the note register-based adjusted difference +6.2 percentage points. The parent is B with 76 points. R01	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Original wording, grade and note for maintained/restored work participation at 12 months	Distinguish the original verdict from this production and review of existing content
2	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N02 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsDo maintained/restored and maintained/increased have the same definition?Required	The subclaim's stored wording says maintained/restored, while the existing reader answer says maintained/increased work participation. This concerns actual work outcomes in national records. R01	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Original classifications of baseline work status, maintenance, restoration and increase	Distinguish original wording from the component results for maintenance, restoration and increase
3	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N03 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsAre the anxiety/depression population and high-risk exclusions distinguished?Required	The parent's original outcome concerns 12-month work participation in adults with anxiety or depression. People at high suicide risk or with severe mental illness or active substance use were excluded. R01	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Diagnosis, baseline work/benefit status, eligibility and exclusions	Distinguish the recruited population from excluded high-risk groups
4	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N04 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsWhat combined service was the intervention?Required	The evidence concerns a combined Norwegian service offering up to 15 sessions of work-focused CBT and individual job support. R01	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Work-focused CBT, individual job support, delivery organization and study exposure	Distinguish the combined program's identity from questions about individual components/other services
5	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N05 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsAre actual usual-care content and concomitant exposures by arm known?Required	The comparison is 630 AWaC participants versus 563 receiving usual care. R01	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Usual care, concomitant treatment, benefit/employment services and changes	Distinguish the effect of assignment to the combined service from limitations of actual concomitant care
6	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N06 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsWhat are the original allocation unit, centers and denominators?Required	This was a pragmatic multicenter randomized trial assigning 1,193 participants at six Norwegian centers, 630/563 by arm. R01	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Centers, randomization process, allocation by arm and denominators	Distinguish centers, allocated people and repeated-record units
7	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N07 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsWhat is the scope of the original evidence on allocation and outcome masking?Required	The stored summary includes the allocation statement about an independent researcher without participant/center-staff contact and objective register-based ascertainment. Participant masking was impossible for psychotherapy. R01	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Independent allocator, participant masking and register-based ascertainment	Distinguish original methods descriptions from this summary-reading scope
8	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N08 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsWhich records established work participation?Required	Monthly work and benefit status were determined from Norwegian national insurance and employment registers. These are actual outcomes distinct from questionnaire scores. R01	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	National insurance/employment registers and monthly work/benefit-status definitions	Distinguish actual work outcomes from questionnaires and other functional outcomes
9	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N09 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsWhat is the scope of zero loss to follow-up at 12 months?Required	The original material states that 12-month results were obtained for all 1,193 participants and primary-outcome loss to follow-up was 0/1,193. R01	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Primary outcome, register-data acquisition/linkage and missing data by arm	Separate complete primary-outcome follow-up from denominators for other materials/time points
10	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N10 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsAre original arm-specific proportions and the unadjusted difference preserved?Required	Maintained/increased participation at 12 months was 44.2% versus 37.2%, unadjusted difference 6.9 percentage points, P=.015. R01	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	44.2/37.2 and the directly reported unadjusted difference/P	Display rounded proportions separately from the directly reported difference
11	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N11 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsWhat is the prespecified covariate-adjusted marginal effect?Required	The described prespecified covariate-adjusted marginal effect is +6.2 percentage points, 95% CI +0.5~+11.8. R01	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Adjusted estimate, CI, covariates and effect of interest	Separate original proportions, unadjusted and adjusted effects
12	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N12 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsDoes the analysis answer assignment, actual participation or completers?Required	The existing evidence list supplies a 12-month comparison of the originally randomized 1,193 participants with complete register follow-up. R01	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Analysis population, effect of interest, concomitant exposures and imputation/exclusions	Distinguish assignment comparisons from adherence/completer effects
13	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N13 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsAre low session attendance and work-outcome follow-up distinguished?Required	Preserve the Korean safety statement describing 5% of AWaC participants stopping treatment before three sessions and the English original describing attendance at fewer than three sessions. R01	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Treatment attendance, discontinuation, reasons/timing and register follow-up	Distinguish treatment participation from primary work-outcome follow-up
14	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N14 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsWere the 12-month primary outcome, prespecified adjustment and planning material actually read?Required	The original summary describes agreement of the objective 12-month work-participation primary outcome with NCT01146730 and prespecified adjustment. A registration citation link is also present. R01 R03	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	NCT, primary outcome, prespecified models, protocol, SAP and history	Distinguish preserved prespecified-planning descriptions from actual external reading
15	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N15 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsHas clinical/work importance of maintenance/restoration been newly defined?Required	Original proportions and effects directly concern work participation at 12 months. R01	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Prespecified importance, working hours, job satisfaction, income and functional criteria	Distinguish statistical comparisons from gaps in importance and other outcomes
16	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N16 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsHas the 18-month observation been transferred into 12-month or long-term effects?Required	The original product information also records an 18-month observed difference of +7.8 percentage points, P=.018. R01 R02	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Comparisons, denominators, observation and analysis by time point	Display 12/18-month and long-term extension results separately
17	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N17 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsHas a favorable short-term result filled in the null full-cohort result at 10~46 months?Required	The same-cohort 10~46-month extension records no significant full-cohort differences in income, work participation or months without benefits. R01 R02	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Direct long-term full-cohort effects and denominators by outcome	Distinguish favorable short-term from null long-term results
18	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N18 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsHas the signal in long-term benefit recipients been expanded to the full cohort?Required	The long-term extension summary states significance only in the long-term-benefit subgroup. R02	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Subgroup definition, plans, denominators, effects and interactions	Display full-cohort and subgroup direct results separately
19	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N19 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsAre same-cohort long-term reports, registration and the two sheets independent replication?Required	The main AWaC report, long-term report and registration concern the same trial; both selected questions share the stored verdict 2954 summary. R01 R02 R03	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Linkage of original trial, extension, registration, participants and time points	Separate citation entries from actual trial/participant units
20	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N20 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsHas complete 12-month follow-up been reused as the long-term analysis denominator?Required	Acquisition of outcomes for all 1,193 participants and zero loss are original statements about the 12-month primary outcome. R02	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Measured, analyzed, linked and lost denominators at 10~46 months	Separate actual observation/analysis scope by time point
21	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N21 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsHave different delivery systems/vocational-advice verdicts been merged as the same effect?Required	The existing advertising interpretation says AWaC differs in delivery system/population from physiotherapist vocational advice in verdict 2944, B with 72 points. The related path is preserved in the summary. R01	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Actual comparisons of the combined service, populations and delivery systems	Preserve only the original related context and distinguish service-specific questions
22	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N22 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsAre public funding, center operation and evaluator roles distinguished?Required	The Korean summary records full funding by the Health and Labour Ministries through the National Strategy on Work and Mental Health, NAV center operation, and independent evaluators uninvolved in center operation/treatment. R01	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Health/Labour Ministries, NAV and evaluator roles/authority	Display public support, service operation and evaluator roles separately
23	Unverified	Full text not readStored summary read	N23 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsAre complete disclosures of author, analysis, writing and publication support available?Required	The stored summary describes public funding, NAV operation and evaluation independence. R01	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Author relationships, analysis, medical writing, publication and data/publication authority	Distinguish known roles from unverified complete disclosures
24	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N24 · Supplementary harm evidenceWere prespecified safety outcomes or serious-adverse-event tables reported?Supplementary	The existing safety explanation states no prespecified safety outcome or serious-adverse-event comparison table was reported. R01	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Harm plans, definitions, collection, arm-specific events and denominators	Distinguish acquisition of work records from safety-data collection
25	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N25 · Supplementary harm evidenceCan high-risk exclusions and 5% low attendance certify harms?Supplementary	Original information excludes high suicide risk, severe mental illness and active substance use, and describes 5% of AWaC participants stopping before three treatment sessions. R01	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	High-risk groups, discontinuation reasons, events, causes and follow-up	Distinguish intervention participation from harms and applicability limits
26	Unverified	Full text not readStored summary read	N26 · Supplementary harm evidenceDo long-term/rare harms and clinical symptoms require separate evidence?Supplementary	Original safety is Unknown; primary work outcomes and the long-term work extension are separate. R01 R02	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Long-term exposure, events, symptoms, function and follow-up denominators	Separate work participation from gaps in clinical/safety outcomes
27	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N27 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsIs actual summary reading distinguished from unread external papers/registration?Required	The complete parent stored summary was read. Main/long-term PubMed URLs and the official registration URL are linked as original citations. R01 R02 R03	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Each citation, original registration URL, preservation and access status	Display summary reading separately from unread external material by type
28	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N28 · Comparative efficacy, work participation and time pointsAre original history/selected-verdict linkage separated from production and content review?Required	Preserve parent Korean/English text, axes, reference date 2026-08-26, empty corrections/deliberation and the selected row within the whole stored summary. Original candidate review-pending/production-eligibility flags are historical. R01 R02 R03	Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict	Parent Korean/English text, axes, dates, corrections, selected row and freezing/application	Record original verdicts/corrections separately from production and review of existing content

No items match your search or filter.

28 itemsWhat the statuses mean

Assessment scope

Stored-material review date: Not recorded
Original evidence cut-off: 2026-08-26
Scope actually checked: Existing review summaries and stored records of methodological application. Full papers, supplements, registrations, plans and original data were not read.
What the dates mean: This is the date the stored materials were checked, not the date of a new search of the clinical literature.
Population: 1,193 adults with anxiety/depression randomized at six Norwegian centers (630/563); high suicide risk, severe mental illness and active substance use excluded; exact long-term denominators separately unverified
Ingredient, formulation and route: Combined AWaC service with up to 15 sessions of work-focused CBT and individual job support
Dose: Original study-service exposure context, not treatment/job-support implementation instructions; actual participation and subsequent exposure details unverified
Comparator: Usual care; details of concomitant/additional treatments and arm-specific changes unread
Measured outcome: Original wording: maintained or restored work participation at 12 months; distinguish maintained/increased wording, baseline classifications and component outcomes
Duration: Distinguish the 12-month primary outcome, 18-month observation and 10~46-month long-term results
Questions outside this scope: No new evidence, effects, CIs, calculations, verdicts, independence certification, participant totals, psychological treatment/job-support/drug changes or treatment instructions are created

Evidence and sources

The links below lead to the sources. A link alone does not mean the original source was read or its latest publication status verified.

R01 · Reme SE, et al. Occup Environ Med. 2015. PMID: 26251065.

PubMed

Material type: Stored summary of the original-trial paper citation
Materials actually read: Summary read; external abstracts, full texts, registration and plans unread
Findings recorded in the stored summary: The grade is B with 76 points. In AWaC, maintained/increased work participation at 12 months was 44.2% versus 37.2%, unadjusted difference 6.9 percentage points (P=.015), and prespecified covariate-adjusted marginal effect +6.2 percentage points (95% CI +0.5~+11.8).
Record level: AWaC objective 12-month work participation; original proportions/unadjusted/adjusted effects and complete register follow-up for the primary outcome
Study overlap and independent replication: Main/long-term AWaC reports and registration linked by the original stored summary; three citations, repeated monthly records, arms and sibling sheets are not totaled as new trials/participants

Public availability, access and reading status by material
Material	Public availability	Access status	Actually read	Notes
Stored summary	Summary read	Stored summary read	Summary read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry
External abstract	Not read	External material unread	Not read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry
External full text	Not read	External material unread	Not read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry
Original registration	Not read	External material unread	Not read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry
Protocol/SAP	Not read	External material unread	Not read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry

R02 · Long-term effects on income and sickness benefits after work-focused CBT and individual job support. PMID: 30032103.

PubMed

Material type: Stored summary of the same trial’s long-term paper citation
Materials actually read: Summary read; external abstracts, full texts, registration and plans unread
Findings recorded in the stored summary: The same-cohort 10~46-month extension found no significant full-cohort differences in income, work participation or months without benefits; only the long-term-benefit subgroup was significant. The established result concerns the full cohort at 12 months, not persistence of effect.
Record level: Same AWaC 10~46-month extension: null full-cohort results and long-term-benefit subgroup context; long-term denominators/original values unverified
Study overlap and independent replication: Main/long-term AWaC reports and registration linked by the original stored summary; three citations, repeated monthly records, arms and sibling sheets are not totaled as new trials/participants

Public availability, access and reading status by material
Material	Public availability	Access status	Actually read	Notes
Stored summary	Summary read	Stored summary read	Summary read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry
External abstract	Not read	External material unread	Not read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry
External full text	Not read	External material unread	Not read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry
Original registration	Not read	External material unread	Not read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry
Protocol/SAP	Not read	External material unread	Not read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry

R03 · NCT01146730. At Work and Coping.

Official source

Material type: Stored summary of the official registration citation
Materials actually read: Summary read; external abstracts, full texts, registration and plans unread
Findings recorded in the stored summary: Trial registration material.
Record level: Same AWaC registration citation; original planning text unread, not a new clinical results report
Study overlap and independent replication: Main/long-term AWaC reports and registration linked by the original stored summary; three citations, repeated monthly records, arms and sibling sheets are not totaled as new trials/participants

Public availability, access and reading status by material
Material	Public availability	Access status	Actually read	Notes
Stored summary	Summary read	Stored summary read	Summary read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry
External abstract	Not read	External material unread	Not read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry
External full text	Not read	External material unread	Not read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry
Original registration	Not read	External material unread	Not read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry
Protocol/SAP	Not read	External material unread	Not read	Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry

Report counts versus independent study counts

Main/long-term AWaC reports and registration linked by the original stored summary; three citations, repeated monthly records, arms and sibling sheets are not totaled as new trials/participants

Review criteria

Version 1.0 · Criteria record date 2026-10-06. These are Chamgap's own application conditions, informed by the referenced methods. They do not constitute official assessment-tool certification or a new efficacy score.

N01 · What are the selected 12-month question and original subclaim verdict?

Required materials and conditions: Original wording, grade and note for maintained/restored work participation at 12 months
Conditions for verification: Original wording, grade and note for maintained/restored work participation at 12 months; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N02 · Do maintained/restored and maintained/increased have the same definition?

Required materials and conditions: Original classifications of baseline work status, maintenance, restoration and increase
Conditions for verification: Original classifications of baseline work status, maintenance, restoration and increase; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N03 · Are the anxiety/depression population and high-risk exclusions distinguished?

Required materials and conditions: Diagnosis, baseline work/benefit status, eligibility and exclusions
Conditions for verification: Diagnosis, baseline work/benefit status, eligibility and exclusions; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N04 · What combined service was the intervention?

Required materials and conditions: Work-focused CBT, individual job support, delivery organization and study exposure
Conditions for verification: Work-focused CBT, individual job support, delivery organization and study exposure; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N05 · Are actual usual-care content and concomitant exposures by arm known?

Required materials and conditions: Usual care, concomitant treatment, benefit/employment services and changes
Conditions for verification: Usual care, concomitant treatment, benefit/employment services and changes; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N06 · What are the original allocation unit, centers and denominators?

Required materials and conditions: Centers, randomization process, allocation by arm and denominators
Conditions for verification: Centers, randomization process, allocation by arm and denominators; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N07 · What is the scope of the original evidence on allocation and outcome masking?

Required materials and conditions: Independent allocator, participant masking and register-based ascertainment
Conditions for verification: Independent allocator, participant masking and register-based ascertainment; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N08 · Which records established work participation?

Required materials and conditions: National insurance/employment registers and monthly work/benefit-status definitions
Conditions for verification: National insurance/employment registers and monthly work/benefit-status definitions; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N09 · What is the scope of zero loss to follow-up at 12 months?

Required materials and conditions: Primary outcome, register-data acquisition/linkage and missing data by arm
Conditions for verification: Primary outcome, register-data acquisition/linkage and missing data by arm; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N10 · Are original arm-specific proportions and the unadjusted difference preserved?

Required materials and conditions: 44.2/37.2 and the directly reported unadjusted difference/P
Conditions for verification: 44.2/37.2 and the directly reported unadjusted difference/P; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N11 · What is the prespecified covariate-adjusted marginal effect?

Required materials and conditions: Adjusted estimate, CI, covariates and effect of interest
Conditions for verification: Adjusted estimate, CI, covariates and effect of interest; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N12 · Does the analysis answer assignment, actual participation or completers?

Required materials and conditions: Analysis population, effect of interest, concomitant exposures and imputation/exclusions
Conditions for verification: Analysis population, effect of interest, concomitant exposures and imputation/exclusions; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N13 · Are low session attendance and work-outcome follow-up distinguished?

Required materials and conditions: Treatment attendance, discontinuation, reasons/timing and register follow-up
Conditions for verification: Treatment attendance, discontinuation, reasons/timing and register follow-up; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N14 · Were the 12-month primary outcome, prespecified adjustment and planning material actually read?

Required materials and conditions: NCT, primary outcome, prespecified models, protocol, SAP and history
Conditions for verification: NCT, primary outcome, prespecified models, protocol, SAP and history; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N15 · Has clinical/work importance of maintenance/restoration been newly defined?

Required materials and conditions: Prespecified importance, working hours, job satisfaction, income and functional criteria
Conditions for verification: Prespecified importance, working hours, job satisfaction, income and functional criteria; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N16 · Has the 18-month observation been transferred into 12-month or long-term effects?

Required materials and conditions: Comparisons, denominators, observation and analysis by time point
Conditions for verification: Comparisons, denominators, observation and analysis by time point; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N17 · Has a favorable short-term result filled in the null full-cohort result at 10~46 months?

Required materials and conditions: Direct long-term full-cohort effects and denominators by outcome
Conditions for verification: Direct long-term full-cohort effects and denominators by outcome; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N18 · Has the signal in long-term benefit recipients been expanded to the full cohort?

Required materials and conditions: Subgroup definition, plans, denominators, effects and interactions
Conditions for verification: Subgroup definition, plans, denominators, effects and interactions; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N19 · Are same-cohort long-term reports, registration and the two sheets independent replication?

Required materials and conditions: Linkage of original trial, extension, registration, participants and time points
Conditions for verification: Linkage of original trial, extension, registration, participants and time points; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N20 · Has complete 12-month follow-up been reused as the long-term analysis denominator?

Required materials and conditions: Measured, analyzed, linked and lost denominators at 10~46 months
Conditions for verification: Measured, analyzed, linked and lost denominators at 10~46 months; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N21 · Have different delivery systems/vocational-advice verdicts been merged as the same effect?

Required materials and conditions: Actual comparisons of the combined service, populations and delivery systems
Conditions for verification: Actual comparisons of the combined service, populations and delivery systems; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N22 · Are public funding, center operation and evaluator roles distinguished?

Required materials and conditions: Health/Labour Ministries, NAV and evaluator roles/authority
Conditions for verification: Health/Labour Ministries, NAV and evaluator roles/authority; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N23 · Are complete disclosures of author, analysis, writing and publication support available?

Required materials and conditions: Author relationships, analysis, medical writing, publication and data/publication authority
Conditions for verification: Author relationships, analysis, medical writing, publication and data/publication authority; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N24 · Were prespecified safety outcomes or serious-adverse-event tables reported?

Required materials and conditions: Harm plans, definitions, collection, arm-specific events and denominators
Conditions for verification: Harm plans, definitions, collection, arm-specific events and denominators; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Supplementary
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Supplementary condition revealing harm collection, exposure and population scope separately from efficacy
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N25 · Can high-risk exclusions and 5% low attendance certify harms?

Required materials and conditions: High-risk groups, discontinuation reasons, events, causes and follow-up
Conditions for verification: High-risk groups, discontinuation reasons, events, causes and follow-up; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Supplementary
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Supplementary condition revealing harm collection, exposure and population scope separately from efficacy
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N26 · Do long-term/rare harms and clinical symptoms require separate evidence?

Required materials and conditions: Long-term exposure, events, symptoms, function and follow-up denominators
Conditions for verification: Long-term exposure, events, symptoms, function and follow-up denominators; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Supplementary
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Supplementary condition revealing harm collection, exposure and population scope separately from efficacy
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N27 · Is actual summary reading distinguished from unread external papers/registration?

Required materials and conditions: Each citation, original registration URL, preservation and access status
Conditions for verification: Each citation, original registration URL, preservation and access status; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

N28 · Are original history/selected-verdict linkage separated from production and content review?

Required materials and conditions: Parent Korean/English text, axes, dates, corrections, selected row and freezing/application
Conditions for verification: Parent Korean/English text, axes, dates, corrections, selected row and freezing/application; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Referenced methods and the sections actually reviewed

M03 · Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08

Official methodology · §3.1, §3.2.1–3.2.3, MECIR C5/C7/C13

Referenced principle: Clearly record the question, eligibility conditions and reasons for changes, and distinguish variations in interventions.
Extent of review: Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited

M04 · Cochrane Handbook 6.5.1 (2025), chapter updated 2025-03

Official methodology · §4.5, §4.6.1–4.6.3, MECIR C42

Referenced principle: Distinguish studies from reports and link them; do not omit a study solely because results are unreported.
Extent of review: Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited

M08 · Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10

Official methodology · §8.1–8.2.3, Table 8.2.a

Referenced principle: Define the outcome and effect of interest, then examine randomization, deviations, missing data, measurement and selective reporting.
Extent of review: Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited

M15 · Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08

Official methodology · §15.2.4, §15.3.1–15.3.3

Referenced principle: Distinguish effect estimates, intervals, importance and applicability. Sample size alone does not determine precision.
Extent of review: Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited

M19 · Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10

Official methodology · §19.1.2, §19.2.1–19.2.4

Referenced principle: Harm questions may require different designs, populations and follow-up from efficacy questions. Case reports do not establish incidence rates.
Extent of review: Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited

What the statuses mean

Partly verified: Some information exists in the preserved review summary; detailed original materials remain unverified. This does not certify a passed review or clinical efficacy.
Unverified: Detailed materials for the selected condition could not be established within the stored scope; this does not mean zero effect, zero studies or safety
Review incomplete: Review of existing content incomplete
Met: Use only within the relevant conditions after existing content review; no automatic designation in this preparation
Not reported: Distinguish only within materials actually read; do not turn unread external materials into unreported findings
Inaccessible: Not applied during this preparation because actual access was not tested
Not applicable: Use with a reason for non-applicability based on an explicit question boundary
Conflicting data: Judge after actual material comparison; review was not performed during this preparation
Insufficient evidence for the conditions: Do not use as a clinical grade encompassing currently unread materials

Change history

2026-10-12 · Public page/material version 1.0

Public reader pages and material were prepared from the existing 28 items. No new clinical searches, verification-state changes or scoring were performed.

The stored-material review date (Not recorded) and original evidence cut-off (2026-08-26) were retained unchanged.

Researcher downloads

These materials provide the same evidence, scope and verification status as this page.

View all item details

N01 · What are the selected 12-month question and original subclaim verdict?

Current findings: The selected stored wording is maintained or restored work participation at 12 months, original grade B, with the note register-based adjusted difference +6.2 percentage points. The parent is B with 76 points.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: The selected row has no score, status or axes. Do not fill its score with parent values or create a new verdict.
Required materials and conditions: Original wording, grade and note for maintained/restored work participation at 12 months
Materials to obtain first: Subclaim and original parent verdict
Further research: Distinguish the original verdict from this production and review of existing content
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Original wording, grade and note for maintained/restored work participation at 12 months; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01

N02 · Do maintained/restored and maintained/increased have the same definition?

Current findings: The subclaim's stored wording says maintained/restored, while the existing reader answer says maintained/increased work participation. This concerns actual work outcomes in national records.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Detailed baseline classifications and separate effects on restoration/maintenance are absent from the summary. Do not unify the two descriptions through an invented definition or change them into return to employment for every participant.
Required materials and conditions: Original classifications of baseline work status, maintenance, restoration and increase
Materials to obtain first: Original work-participation definition, baseline classifications and results by category
Further research: Distinguish original wording from the component results for maintenance, restoration and increase
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Original classifications of baseline work status, maintenance, restoration and increase; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01

N03 · Are the anxiety/depression population and high-risk exclusions distinguished?

Current findings: The parent's original outcome concerns 12-month work participation in adults with anxiety or depression. People at high suicide risk or with severe mental illness or active substance use were excluded.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not generalize to all major depressive disorder, severe/high-risk cases or other ages/countries. Detailed diagnoses and baseline work/benefit status remain unread.
Required materials and conditions: Diagnosis, baseline work/benefit status, eligibility and exclusions
Materials to obtain first: Original eligibility, baseline and exclusion tables
Further research: Distinguish the recruited population from excluded high-risk groups
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Diagnosis, baseline work/benefit status, eligibility and exclusions; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01

N04 · What combined service was the intervention?

Current findings: The evidence concerns a combined Norwegian service offering up to 15 sessions of work-focused CBT and individual job support.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not decompose this into effects of CBT alone, job support alone or other services. Do not create session, job-support or treatment instructions.
Required materials and conditions: Work-focused CBT, individual job support, delivery organization and study exposure
Materials to obtain first: Specifications of both components, delivery organization and actual exposure
Further research: Distinguish the combined program's identity from questions about individual components/other services
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Work-focused CBT, individual job support, delivery organization and study exposure; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01

N05 · Are actual usual-care content and concomitant exposures by arm known?

Current findings: The comparison is 630 AWaC participants versus 563 receiving usual care.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Details of usual care, concomitant psychological/drug/employment exposures, crossover and changes are absent. Do not assert identical concomitant conditions or a pure CBT effect.
Required materials and conditions: Usual care, concomitant treatment, benefit/employment services and changes
Materials to obtain first: Arm-specific usual care, concomitant exposures and changes
Further research: Distinguish the effect of assignment to the combined service from limitations of actual concomitant care
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Usual care, concomitant treatment, benefit/employment services and changes; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01

N06 · What are the original allocation unit, centers and denominators?

Current findings: This was a pragmatic multicenter randomized trial assigning 1,193 participants at six Norwegian centers, 630/563 by arm.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not count centers, arms or repeated monthly records as new participants or independent trials. Complete register follow-up differs from treatment completion.
Required materials and conditions: Centers, randomization process, allocation by arm and denominators
Materials to obtain first: Allocation, centers and participant flow
Further research: Distinguish centers, allocated people and repeated-record units
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Centers, randomization process, allocation by arm and denominators; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01

N07 · What is the scope of the original evidence on allocation and outcome masking?

Current findings: The stored summary includes the allocation statement about an independent researcher without participant/center-staff contact and objective register-based ascertainment. Participant masking was impossible for psychotherapy.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not turn parent B0 or the quoted statements into completion of current methodology review. Original details of implementation, baseline balance and register processing are unread.
Required materials and conditions: Independent allocator, participant masking and register-based ascertainment
Materials to obtain first: Allocation, register-based ascertainment and measurement methods
Further research: Distinguish original methods descriptions from this summary-reading scope
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Independent allocator, participant masking and register-based ascertainment; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01

N08 · Which records established work participation?

Current findings: Monthly work and benefit status were determined from Norwegian national insurance and employment registers. These are actual outcomes distinct from questionnaire scores.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Details of actual working hours, employment type, benefit classifications, linkage and error handling are unread. Do not say register data answer every clinical/work-performance question.
Required materials and conditions: National insurance/employment registers and monthly work/benefit-status definitions
Materials to obtain first: Register definitions, linkage and monthly ascertainment specifications
Further research: Distinguish actual work outcomes from questionnaires and other functional outcomes
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: National insurance/employment registers and monthly work/benefit-status definitions; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01

N09 · What is the scope of zero loss to follow-up at 12 months?

Current findings: The original material states that 12-month results were obtained for all 1,193 participants and primary-outcome loss to follow-up was 0/1,193.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not equate this with complete treatment/questionnaire participation, complete collection of every event or full long-term follow-up.
Required materials and conditions: Primary outcome, register-data acquisition/linkage and missing data by arm
Materials to obtain first: Original primary-outcome register follow-up, linkage and analysis tables
Further research: Separate complete primary-outcome follow-up from denominators for other materials/time points
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Primary outcome, register-data acquisition/linkage and missing data by arm; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01

N10 · Are original arm-specific proportions and the unadjusted difference preserved?

Current findings: Maintained/increased participation at 12 months was 44.2% versus 37.2%, unadjusted difference 6.9 percentage points, P=.015.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not calculate new differences, event counts or NNT from the original proportions. Preserve the proportions and directly reported difference separately unchanged.
Required materials and conditions: 44.2/37.2 and the directly reported unadjusted difference/P
Materials to obtain first: Original proportions, unadjusted estimate and denominator tables
Further research: Display rounded proportions separately from the directly reported difference
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: 44.2/37.2 and the directly reported unadjusted difference/P; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01

N11 · What is the prespecified covariate-adjusted marginal effect?

Current findings: The described prespecified covariate-adjusted marginal effect is +6.2 percentage points, 95% CI +0.5~+11.8.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not merge the unadjusted 6.9-percentage-point difference with the adjusted effect. Exact models, covariates and estimands are externally unread; do not create new effects or CIs.
Required materials and conditions: Adjusted estimate, CI, covariates and effect of interest
Materials to obtain first: Original adjustment model, marginal effect and planning material
Further research: Separate original proportions, unadjusted and adjusted effects
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Adjusted estimate, CI, covariates and effect of interest; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01

N12 · Does the analysis answer assignment, actual participation or completers?

Current findings: The existing evidence list supplies a 12-month comparison of the originally randomized 1,193 participants with complete register follow-up.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not establish detailed models, effects of actual treatment adherence or individual components. Complete register follow-up does not mean everyone participated in the intervention.
Required materials and conditions: Analysis population, effect of interest, concomitant exposures and imputation/exclusions
Materials to obtain first: Original analysis models, actual participation and changes by arm
Further research: Distinguish assignment comparisons from adherence/completer effects
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Analysis population, effect of interest, concomitant exposures and imputation/exclusions; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01

N13 · Are low session attendance and work-outcome follow-up distinguished?

Current findings: Preserve the Korean safety statement describing 5% of AWaC participants stopping treatment before three sessions and the English original describing attendance at fewer than three sessions.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not calculate participant counts from 5% or turn it into clinical harm or total follow-up loss. Reasons, exposure and discontinuation differ from work records.
Required materials and conditions: Treatment attendance, discontinuation, reasons/timing and register follow-up
Materials to obtain first: Treatment attendance/discontinuation, reasons and register-data flow
Further research: Distinguish treatment participation from primary work-outcome follow-up
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Treatment attendance, discontinuation, reasons/timing and register follow-up; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01

N14 · Were the 12-month primary outcome, prespecified adjustment and planning material actually read?

Current findings: The original summary describes agreement of the objective 12-month work-participation primary outcome with NCT01146730 and prespecified adjustment. A registration citation link is also present.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Registration text/dates, protocol, SAP, multiplicity and amendment history are unread. A URL does not establish completion of review of prespecification.
Required materials and conditions: NCT, primary outcome, prespecified models, protocol, SAP and history
Materials to obtain first: Registration, plans before recruitment, SAP and amendment documents
Further research: Distinguish preserved prespecified-planning descriptions from actual external reading
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: NCT, primary outcome, prespecified models, protocol, SAP and history; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01 R03

N15 · Has clinical/work importance of maintenance/restoration been newly defined?

Current findings: Original proportions and effects directly concern work participation at 12 months.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not create minimally important clinical differences, working hours, employment quality, individual examples or economic effects absent from the summary. Actual work events do not answer every other life outcome.
Required materials and conditions: Prespecified importance, working hours, job satisfaction, income and functional criteria
Materials to obtain first: Direct results on importance, working hours, function and economic outcomes
Further research: Distinguish statistical comparisons from gaps in importance and other outcomes
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Prespecified importance, working hours, job satisfaction, income and functional criteria; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01

N16 · Has the 18-month observation been transferred into 12-month or long-term effects?

Current findings: The original product information also records an 18-month observed difference of +7.8 percentage points, P=.018.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: The summary has no 18-month CI, denominator or adjustment status. Do not change this into the 12-month adjusted value or long-term full-cohort confirmation.
Required materials and conditions: Comparisons, denominators, observation and analysis by time point
Materials to obtain first: 18-month analysis, denominators and intervals
Further research: Display 12/18-month and long-term extension results separately
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Comparisons, denominators, observation and analysis by time point; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01 R02

N17 · Has a favorable short-term result filled in the null full-cohort result at 10~46 months?

Current findings: The same-cohort 10~46-month extension records no significant full-cohort differences in income, work participation or months without benefits.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not copy the 12-month +6.2-percentage-point result as sustained full-cohort benefit or certify a null result as exactly zero/equivalence.
Required materials and conditions: Direct long-term full-cohort effects and denominators by outcome
Materials to obtain first: Original long-term full-cohort results/follow-up by outcome
Further research: Distinguish favorable short-term from null long-term results
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Direct long-term full-cohort effects and denominators by outcome; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01 R02

N18 · Has the signal in long-term benefit recipients been expanded to the full cohort?

Current findings: The long-term extension summary states significance only in the long-term-benefit subgroup.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Exact subgroup criteria, effects, denominators, plans and interactions are absent. Do not promote this signal to sustained full-cohort superiority.
Required materials and conditions: Subgroup definition, plans, denominators, effects and interactions
Materials to obtain first: Original subgroup plans, definitions, effects and interaction tables
Further research: Display full-cohort and subgroup direct results separately
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Subgroup definition, plans, denominators, effects and interactions; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R02

N19 · Are same-cohort long-term reports, registration and the two sheets independent replication?

Current findings: The main AWaC report, long-term report and registration concern the same trial; both selected questions share the stored verdict 2954 summary.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not aggregate three citation entries, two sheets, monthly records, centers or time points into new independent trials/participants. Confirmed counts remain null.
Required materials and conditions: Linkage of original trial, extension, registration, participants and time points
Materials to obtain first: Report, registration, time-point and participant linkage material
Further research: Separate citation entries from actual trial/participant units
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Linkage of original trial, extension, registration, participants and time points; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01 R02 R03

N20 · Has complete 12-month follow-up been reused as the long-term analysis denominator?

Current findings: Acquisition of outcomes for all 1,193 participants and zero loss are original statements about the 12-month primary outcome.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not fill the exact long-term full-cohort analysis/follow-up denominators with those same values. Detailed long-term reporting is externally unread.
Required materials and conditions: Measured, analyzed, linked and lost denominators at 10~46 months
Materials to obtain first: Long-term denominators, register linkage and analysis tables
Further research: Separate actual observation/analysis scope by time point
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Measured, analyzed, linked and lost denominators at 10~46 months; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R02

N21 · Have different delivery systems/vocational-advice verdicts been merged as the same effect?

Current findings: The existing advertising interpretation says AWaC differs in delivery system/population from physiotherapist vocational advice in verdict 2944, B with 72 points. The related path is preserved in the summary.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not newly retrieve/check that verdict or link. Do not combine another service's effects or count it as independent replication.
Required materials and conditions: Actual comparisons of the combined service, populations and delivery systems
Materials to obtain first: Direct comparison material by delivery system/population
Further research: Preserve only the original related context and distinguish service-specific questions
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Actual comparisons of the combined service, populations and delivery systems; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01

N22 · Are public funding, center operation and evaluator roles distinguished?

Current findings: The Korean summary records full funding by the Health and Labour Ministries through the National Strategy on Work and Mental Health, NAV center operation, and independent evaluators uninvolved in center operation/treatment.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not merge funding, operational and evaluator roles or convert them to current independence certification. Complete authority/disclosures remain unread.
Required materials and conditions: Health/Labour Ministries, NAV and evaluator roles/authority
Materials to obtain first: Funding, operational/evaluation roles and data-authority disclosures
Further research: Display public support, service operation and evaluator roles separately
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Health/Labour Ministries, NAV and evaluator roles/authority; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01

N23 · Are complete disclosures of author, analysis, writing and publication support available?

Current findings: The stored summary describes public funding, NAV operation and evaluation independence.
Verification status: Unverified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not certify every unmentioned item as absent, including company product support, employee authors, outsourced analysis, writing or publication fees.
Required materials and conditions: Author relationships, analysis, medical writing, publication and data/publication authority
Materials to obtain first: Author/supporter, data and publication disclosures
Further research: Distinguish known roles from unverified complete disclosures
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Author relationships, analysis, medical writing, publication and data/publication authority; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01

N24 · Were prespecified safety outcomes or serious-adverse-event tables reported?

Current findings: The existing safety explanation states no prespecified safety outcome or serious-adverse-event comparison table was reported.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not turn unverified harms into zero events, service safety or equivalence to control. Complete register work-outcome follow-up differs from complete harm collection.
Required materials and conditions: Harm plans, definitions, collection, arm-specific events and denominators
Materials to obtain first: Harm plans, arm-specific events, exposure and discontinuation tables
Further research: Distinguish acquisition of work records from safety-data collection
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Harm plans, definitions, collection, arm-specific events and denominators; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Supplementary condition revealing harm collection, exposure and population scope separately from efficacy
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01

N25 · Can high-risk exclusions and 5% low attendance certify harms?

Current findings: Original information excludes high suicide risk, severe mental illness and active substance use, and describes 5% of AWaC participants stopping before three treatment sessions.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Do not calculate harm incidence from 5% or fill in safety/treatment efficacy for excluded groups. Do not create new treatment instructions.
Required materials and conditions: High-risk groups, discontinuation reasons, events, causes and follow-up
Materials to obtain first: Excluded populations, attendance/discontinuation reasons and event data
Further research: Distinguish intervention participation from harms and applicability limits
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: High-risk groups, discontinuation reasons, events, causes and follow-up; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Supplementary condition revealing harm collection, exposure and population scope separately from efficacy
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01

N26 · Do long-term/rare harms and clinical symptoms require separate evidence?

Current findings: Original safety is Unknown; primary work outcomes and the long-term work extension are separate.
Verification status: Unverified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Favorable work-participation results or null long-term results cannot establish mental-health cure, long-term safety or absence of rare harms.
Required materials and conditions: Long-term exposure, events, symptoms, function and follow-up denominators
Materials to obtain first: Direct material on long-term harms, clinical symptoms and function
Further research: Separate work participation from gaps in clinical/safety outcomes
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Long-term exposure, events, symptoms, function and follow-up denominators; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Supplementary condition revealing harm collection, exposure and population scope separately from efficacy
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01 R02

N27 · Is actual summary reading distinguished from unread external papers/registration?

Current findings: The complete parent stored summary was read. Main/long-term PubMed URLs and the official registration URL are linked as original citations.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol, SAP, links and screens were not read/checked. A URL's presence does not establish reading or quality certification.
Required materials and conditions: Each citation, original registration URL, preservation and access status
Materials to obtain first: Main/long-term reports, registration and planning material
Further research: Display summary reading separately from unread external material by type
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Each citation, original registration URL, preservation and access status; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01 R02 R03

N28 · Are original history/selected-verdict linkage separated from production and content review?

Current findings: Preserve parent Korean/English text, axes, reference date 2026-08-26, empty corrections/deliberation and the selected row within the whole stored summary. Original candidate review-pending/production-eligibility flags are historical.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; related external material unread
Why unverified: Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict
Reason for missing information: Keep absent subclaim score/status/axes and the reference date; do not activate review waiting. Existing-content review remains incomplete, completion flags false, new units 0 and confirmed independence count unrecorded.
Required materials and conditions: Parent Korean/English text, axes, dates, corrections, selected row and freezing/application
Materials to obtain first: Original stored summary, existing selection and condition/application events
Further research: Record original verdicts/corrections separately from production and review of existing content
Remaining uncertainty: External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed
Conditions for verification: Parent Korean/English text, axes, dates, corrections, selected row and freezing/application; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.
Why this condition is needed: Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome
Application exceptions: Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material
Referenced methods: Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete

Related sources R01 R02 R03