{
  "schema_version": "chamgap-public-criteria-1.0",
  "title": "Work-focused CBT and job support × Work participation at 12 months — Evidence Check",
  "language": "en",
  "translation_date": "2026-10-12",
  "criteria_version": "1.0",
  "criteria_date": "2026-10-06",
  "condition_origin": "Chamgap's own application conditions",
  "method_sources": [
    {
      "id": "M03",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-03",
      "section": "§3.1, §3.2.1–3.2.3, MECIR C5/C7/C13",
      "official_principle": "Clearly record the question, eligibility conditions and reasons for changes, and distinguish variations in interventions.",
      "review_level": "Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited"
    },
    {
      "id": "M04",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5.1 (2025), chapter updated 2025-03",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-04",
      "section": "§4.5, §4.6.1–4.6.3, MECIR C42",
      "official_principle": "Distinguish studies from reports and link them; do not omit a study solely because results are unreported.",
      "review_level": "Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited"
    },
    {
      "id": "M08",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-08",
      "section": "§8.1–8.2.3, Table 8.2.a",
      "official_principle": "Define the outcome and effect of interest, then examine randomization, deviations, missing data, measurement and selective reporting.",
      "review_level": "Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited"
    },
    {
      "id": "M15",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-15",
      "section": "§15.2.4, §15.3.1–15.3.3",
      "official_principle": "Distinguish effect estimates, intervals, importance and applicability. Sample size alone does not determine precision.",
      "review_level": "Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited"
    },
    {
      "id": "M19",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-19",
      "section": "§19.1.2, §19.2.1–19.2.4",
      "official_principle": "Harm questions may require different designs, populations and follow-up from efficacy questions. Case reports do not establish incidence rates.",
      "review_level": "Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited"
    }
  ],
  "status_dictionary": {
    "Partly verified": "Some information exists in the preserved review summary; detailed original materials remain unverified. This does not certify a passed review or clinical efficacy.",
    "Unverified": "Detailed materials for the selected condition could not be established within the stored scope; this does not mean zero effect, zero studies or safety",
    "Review incomplete": "Review of existing content incomplete",
    "Met": "Use only within the relevant conditions after existing content review; no automatic designation in this preparation",
    "Not reported": "Distinguish only within materials actually read; do not turn unread external materials into unreported findings",
    "Inaccessible": "Not applied during this preparation because actual access was not tested",
    "Not applicable": "Use with a reason for non-applicability based on an explicit question boundary",
    "Conflicting data": "Judge after actual material comparison; review was not performed during this preparation",
    "Insufficient evidence for the conditions": "Do not use as a clinical grade encompassing currently unread materials"
  },
  "requirements": [
    {
      "item_id": "N01",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "What are the selected 12-month question and original subclaim verdict?",
      "needed": "Original wording, grade and note for maintained/restored work participation at 12 months",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Original wording, grade and note for maintained/restored work participation at 12 months; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish the original verdict from this production and review of existing content"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N02",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Do maintained/restored and maintained/increased have the same definition?",
      "needed": "Original classifications of baseline work status, maintenance, restoration and increase",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Original classifications of baseline work status, maintenance, restoration and increase; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish original wording from the component results for maintenance, restoration and increase"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N03",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Are the anxiety/depression population and high-risk exclusions distinguished?",
      "needed": "Diagnosis, baseline work/benefit status, eligibility and exclusions",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Diagnosis, baseline work/benefit status, eligibility and exclusions; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish the recruited population from excluded high-risk groups"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N04",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "What combined service was the intervention?",
      "needed": "Work-focused CBT, individual job support, delivery organization and study exposure",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Work-focused CBT, individual job support, delivery organization and study exposure; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish the combined program's identity from questions about individual components/other services"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N05",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Are actual usual-care content and concomitant exposures by arm known?",
      "needed": "Usual care, concomitant treatment, benefit/employment services and changes",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Usual care, concomitant treatment, benefit/employment services and changes; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish the effect of assignment to the combined service from limitations of actual concomitant care"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N06",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "What are the original allocation unit, centers and denominators?",
      "needed": "Centers, randomization process, allocation by arm and denominators",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Centers, randomization process, allocation by arm and denominators; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish centers, allocated people and repeated-record units"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N07",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "What is the scope of the original evidence on allocation and outcome masking?",
      "needed": "Independent allocator, participant masking and register-based ascertainment",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Independent allocator, participant masking and register-based ascertainment; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish original methods descriptions from this summary-reading scope"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N08",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Which records established work participation?",
      "needed": "National insurance/employment registers and monthly work/benefit-status definitions",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "National insurance/employment registers and monthly work/benefit-status definitions; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish actual work outcomes from questionnaires and other functional outcomes"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N09",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "What is the scope of zero loss to follow-up at 12 months?",
      "needed": "Primary outcome, register-data acquisition/linkage and missing data by arm",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Primary outcome, register-data acquisition/linkage and missing data by arm; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Separate complete primary-outcome follow-up from denominators for other materials/time points"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N10",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Are original arm-specific proportions and the unadjusted difference preserved?",
      "needed": "44.2/37.2 and the directly reported unadjusted difference/P",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "44.2/37.2 and the directly reported unadjusted difference/P; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Display rounded proportions separately from the directly reported difference"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N11",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "What is the prespecified covariate-adjusted marginal effect?",
      "needed": "Adjusted estimate, CI, covariates and effect of interest",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Adjusted estimate, CI, covariates and effect of interest; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Separate original proportions, unadjusted and adjusted effects"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N12",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Does the analysis answer assignment, actual participation or completers?",
      "needed": "Analysis population, effect of interest, concomitant exposures and imputation/exclusions",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Analysis population, effect of interest, concomitant exposures and imputation/exclusions; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish assignment comparisons from adherence/completer effects"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N13",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Are low session attendance and work-outcome follow-up distinguished?",
      "needed": "Treatment attendance, discontinuation, reasons/timing and register follow-up",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Treatment attendance, discontinuation, reasons/timing and register follow-up; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish treatment participation from primary work-outcome follow-up"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N14",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Were the 12-month primary outcome, prespecified adjustment and planning material actually read?",
      "needed": "NCT, primary outcome, prespecified models, protocol, SAP and history",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "NCT, primary outcome, prespecified models, protocol, SAP and history; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish preserved prespecified-planning descriptions from actual external reading"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N15",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Has clinical/work importance of maintenance/restoration been newly defined?",
      "needed": "Prespecified importance, working hours, job satisfaction, income and functional criteria",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Prespecified importance, working hours, job satisfaction, income and functional criteria; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish statistical comparisons from gaps in importance and other outcomes"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N16",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Has the 18-month observation been transferred into 12-month or long-term effects?",
      "needed": "Comparisons, denominators, observation and analysis by time point",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Comparisons, denominators, observation and analysis by time point; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Display 12/18-month and long-term extension results separately"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N17",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Has a favorable short-term result filled in the null full-cohort result at 10~46 months?",
      "needed": "Direct long-term full-cohort effects and denominators by outcome",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Direct long-term full-cohort effects and denominators by outcome; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish favorable short-term from null long-term results"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N18",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Has the signal in long-term benefit recipients been expanded to the full cohort?",
      "needed": "Subgroup definition, plans, denominators, effects and interactions",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Subgroup definition, plans, denominators, effects and interactions; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Display full-cohort and subgroup direct results separately"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N19",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Are same-cohort long-term reports, registration and the two sheets independent replication?",
      "needed": "Linkage of original trial, extension, registration, participants and time points",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Linkage of original trial, extension, registration, participants and time points; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Separate citation entries from actual trial/participant units"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N20",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Has complete 12-month follow-up been reused as the long-term analysis denominator?",
      "needed": "Measured, analyzed, linked and lost denominators at 10~46 months",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Measured, analyzed, linked and lost denominators at 10~46 months; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Separate actual observation/analysis scope by time point"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N21",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Have different delivery systems/vocational-advice verdicts been merged as the same effect?",
      "needed": "Actual comparisons of the combined service, populations and delivery systems",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Actual comparisons of the combined service, populations and delivery systems; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Preserve only the original related context and distinguish service-specific questions"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N22",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Are public funding, center operation and evaluator roles distinguished?",
      "needed": "Health/Labour Ministries, NAV and evaluator roles/authority",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Health/Labour Ministries, NAV and evaluator roles/authority; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Display public support, service operation and evaluator roles separately"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N23",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Are complete disclosures of author, analysis, writing and publication support available?",
      "needed": "Author relationships, analysis, medical writing, publication and data/publication authority",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Author relationships, analysis, medical writing, publication and data/publication authority; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish known roles from unverified complete disclosures"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N24",
      "question_type": "Supplementary harm evidence",
      "question": "Were prespecified safety outcomes or serious-adverse-event tables reported?",
      "needed": "Harm plans, definitions, collection, arm-specific events and denominators",
      "role": "Supplementary",
      "role_reason": "Supplementary condition revealing harm collection, exposure and population scope separately from efficacy",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Harm plans, definitions, collection, arm-specific events and denominators; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish acquisition of work records from safety-data collection"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N25",
      "question_type": "Supplementary harm evidence",
      "question": "Can high-risk exclusions and 5% low attendance certify harms?",
      "needed": "High-risk groups, discontinuation reasons, events, causes and follow-up",
      "role": "Supplementary",
      "role_reason": "Supplementary condition revealing harm collection, exposure and population scope separately from efficacy",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "High-risk groups, discontinuation reasons, events, causes and follow-up; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish intervention participation from harms and applicability limits"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N26",
      "question_type": "Supplementary harm evidence",
      "question": "Do long-term/rare harms and clinical symptoms require separate evidence?",
      "needed": "Long-term exposure, events, symptoms, function and follow-up denominators",
      "role": "Supplementary",
      "role_reason": "Supplementary condition revealing harm collection, exposure and population scope separately from efficacy",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Long-term exposure, events, symptoms, function and follow-up denominators; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Separate work participation from gaps in clinical/safety outcomes"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N27",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Is actual summary reading distinguished from unread external papers/registration?",
      "needed": "Each citation, original registration URL, preservation and access status",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Each citation, original registration URL, preservation and access status; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Display summary reading separately from unread external material by type"
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N28",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points",
      "question": "Are original history/selected-verdict linkage separated from production and content review?",
      "needed": "Parent Korean/English text, axes, dates, corrections, selected row and freezing/application",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome",
      "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material",
      "criterion": "Parent Korean/English text, axes, dates, corrections, selected row and freezing/application; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.",
      "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete",
      "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete",
      "proposed_research": "Record original verdicts/corrections separately from production and review of existing content"
    }
  ]
}