{ "schema_version": "chamgap-public-evidence-check-1.0", "public_id": "v2954-s0", "verdict_number": "2954", "title": "Work-focused CBT and job support × Work participation at 12 months — Evidence Check", "view_version": "1.0", "view_created_date": "2026-10-12", "criteria_version": "1.0", "criteria_date": "2026-10-06", "review_date": null, "legacy_evidence_date": "2026-08-26", "review_scope": { "materials_read": "Existing review summaries and stored records of methodological application", "clinical_papers_directly_read": false, "new_clinical_search": false, "limitation": "The whole stored parent-verdict summary and selected subclaim were read for production. External papers, abstracts, full texts, registry, protocol, SAP and funding disclosures were not separately read or accessed. Historical review records are not inherited as current clinical verification or a new verdict.", "date_meaning": "This is the date the stored materials were checked, not the date of a new search of the clinical literature." }, "claim_context": { "population": "1,193 adults with anxiety/depression randomized at six Norwegian centers (630/563); high suicide risk, severe mental illness and active substance use excluded; exact long-term denominators separately unverified", "intervention": "Combined AWaC service with up to 15 sessions of work-focused CBT and individual job support", "dose": "Original study-service exposure context, not treatment/job-support implementation instructions; actual participation and subsequent exposure details unverified", "comparator": "Usual care; details of concomitant/additional treatments and arm-specific changes unread", "endpoint": "Original wording: maintained or restored work participation at 12 months; distinguish maintained/increased wording, baseline classifications and component outcomes", "duration": "Distinguish the 12-month primary outcome, 18-month observation and 10~46-month long-term results", "excluded_extensions": [ "No new evidence, effects, CIs, calculations, verdicts, independence certification, participant totals, psychological treatment/job-support/drug changes or treatment instructions are created" ] }, "requirements": [ { "item_id": "N01", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points", "question": "What are the selected 12-month question and original subclaim verdict?", "needed": "Original wording, grade and note for maintained/restored work participation at 12 months", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome", "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material", "criterion": "Original wording, grade and note for maintained/restored work participation at 12 months; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.", "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete", "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish the original verdict from this production and review of existing content", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original wording, citations and context appear in the preserved existing summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The selected stored wording is maintained or restored work participation at 12 months, original grade B, with the note register-based adjusted difference +6.2 percentage points. The parent is B with 76 points.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict", "missingness": "The selected row has no score, status or axes. Do not fill its score with parent values or create a new verdict.", "uncertainty": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Subclaim and original parent verdict" }, { "item_id": "N02", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points", "question": "Do maintained/restored and maintained/increased have the same definition?", "needed": "Original classifications of baseline work status, maintenance, restoration and increase", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome", "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material", "criterion": "Original classifications of baseline work status, maintenance, restoration and increase; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.", "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete", "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish original wording from the component results for maintenance, restoration and increase", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original wording, citations and context appear in the preserved existing summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The subclaim's stored wording says maintained/restored, while the existing reader answer says maintained/increased work participation. This concerns actual work outcomes in national records.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict", "missingness": "Detailed baseline classifications and separate effects on restoration/maintenance are absent from the summary. Do not unify the two descriptions through an invented definition or change them into return to employment for every participant.", "uncertainty": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Original work-participation definition, baseline classifications and results by category" }, { "item_id": "N03", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points", "question": "Are the anxiety/depression population and high-risk exclusions distinguished?", "needed": "Diagnosis, baseline work/benefit status, eligibility and exclusions", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome", "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material", "criterion": "Diagnosis, baseline work/benefit status, eligibility and exclusions; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.", "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete", "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish the recruited population from excluded high-risk groups", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original wording, citations and context appear in the preserved existing summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The parent's original outcome concerns 12-month work participation in adults with anxiety or depression. People at high suicide risk or with severe mental illness or active substance use were excluded.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict", "missingness": "Do not generalize to all major depressive disorder, severe/high-risk cases or other ages/countries. Detailed diagnoses and baseline work/benefit status remain unread.", "uncertainty": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Original eligibility, baseline and exclusion tables" }, { "item_id": "N04", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points", "question": "What combined service was the intervention?", "needed": "Work-focused CBT, individual job support, delivery organization and study exposure", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome", "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material", "criterion": "Work-focused CBT, individual job support, delivery organization and study exposure; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.", "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete", "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish the combined program's identity from questions about individual components/other services", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original wording, citations and context appear in the preserved existing summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The evidence concerns a combined Norwegian service offering up to 15 sessions of work-focused CBT and individual job support.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict", "missingness": "Do not decompose this into effects of CBT alone, job support alone or other services. Do not create session, job-support or treatment instructions.", "uncertainty": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Specifications of both components, delivery organization and actual exposure" }, { "item_id": "N05", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points", "question": "Are actual usual-care content and concomitant exposures by arm known?", "needed": "Usual care, concomitant treatment, benefit/employment services and changes", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome", "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material", "criterion": "Usual care, concomitant treatment, benefit/employment services and changes; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.", "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete", "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish the effect of assignment to the combined service from limitations of actual concomitant care", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original wording, citations and context appear in the preserved existing summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The comparison is 630 AWaC participants versus 563 receiving usual care.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict", "missingness": "Details of usual care, concomitant psychological/drug/employment exposures, crossover and changes are absent. Do not assert identical concomitant conditions or a pure CBT effect.", "uncertainty": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Arm-specific usual care, concomitant exposures and changes" }, { "item_id": "N06", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points", "question": "What are the original allocation unit, centers and denominators?", "needed": "Centers, randomization process, allocation by arm and denominators", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome", "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material", "criterion": "Centers, randomization process, allocation by arm and denominators; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.", "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete", "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish centers, allocated people and repeated-record units", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original wording, citations and context appear in the preserved existing summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "This was a pragmatic multicenter randomized trial assigning 1,193 participants at six Norwegian centers, 630/563 by arm.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict", "missingness": "Do not count centers, arms or repeated monthly records as new participants or independent trials. Complete register follow-up differs from treatment completion.", "uncertainty": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Allocation, centers and participant flow" }, { "item_id": "N07", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points", "question": "What is the scope of the original evidence on allocation and outcome masking?", "needed": "Independent allocator, participant masking and register-based ascertainment", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome", "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material", "criterion": "Independent allocator, participant masking and register-based ascertainment; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.", "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete", "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish original methods descriptions from this summary-reading scope", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original wording, citations and context appear in the preserved existing summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The stored summary includes the allocation statement about an independent researcher without participant/center-staff contact and objective register-based ascertainment. Participant masking was impossible for psychotherapy.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict", "missingness": "Do not turn parent B0 or the quoted statements into completion of current methodology review. Original details of implementation, baseline balance and register processing are unread.", "uncertainty": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Allocation, register-based ascertainment and measurement methods" }, { "item_id": "N08", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points", "question": "Which records established work participation?", "needed": "National insurance/employment registers and monthly work/benefit-status definitions", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome", "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material", "criterion": "National insurance/employment registers and monthly work/benefit-status definitions; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.", "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete", "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish actual work outcomes from questionnaires and other functional outcomes", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original wording, citations and context appear in the preserved existing summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "Monthly work and benefit status were determined from Norwegian national insurance and employment registers. These are actual outcomes distinct from questionnaire scores.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict", "missingness": "Details of actual working hours, employment type, benefit classifications, linkage and error handling are unread. Do not say register data answer every clinical/work-performance question.", "uncertainty": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Register definitions, linkage and monthly ascertainment specifications" }, { "item_id": "N09", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points", "question": "What is the scope of zero loss to follow-up at 12 months?", "needed": "Primary outcome, register-data acquisition/linkage and missing data by arm", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome", "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material", "criterion": "Primary outcome, register-data acquisition/linkage and missing data by arm; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.", "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete", "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete", "proposed_research": "Separate complete primary-outcome follow-up from denominators for other materials/time points", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original wording, citations and context appear in the preserved existing summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The original material states that 12-month results were obtained for all 1,193 participants and primary-outcome loss to follow-up was 0/1,193.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict", "missingness": "Do not equate this with complete treatment/questionnaire participation, complete collection of every event or full long-term follow-up.", "uncertainty": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Original primary-outcome register follow-up, linkage and analysis tables" }, { "item_id": "N10", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points", "question": "Are original arm-specific proportions and the unadjusted difference preserved?", "needed": "44.2/37.2 and the directly reported unadjusted difference/P", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome", "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material", "criterion": "44.2/37.2 and the directly reported unadjusted difference/P; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.", "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete", "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete", "proposed_research": "Display rounded proportions separately from the directly reported difference", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original wording, citations and context appear in the preserved existing summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "Maintained/increased participation at 12 months was 44.2% versus 37.2%, unadjusted difference 6.9 percentage points, P=.015.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict", "missingness": "Do not calculate new differences, event counts or NNT from the original proportions. Preserve the proportions and directly reported difference separately unchanged.", "uncertainty": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Original proportions, unadjusted estimate and denominator tables" }, { "item_id": "N11", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points", "question": "What is the prespecified covariate-adjusted marginal effect?", "needed": "Adjusted estimate, CI, covariates and effect of interest", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome", "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material", "criterion": "Adjusted estimate, CI, covariates and effect of interest; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.", "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete", "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete", "proposed_research": "Separate original proportions, unadjusted and adjusted effects", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original wording, citations and context appear in the preserved existing summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The described prespecified covariate-adjusted marginal effect is +6.2 percentage points, 95% CI +0.5~+11.8.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict", "missingness": "Do not merge the unadjusted 6.9-percentage-point difference with the adjusted effect. Exact models, covariates and estimands are externally unread; do not create new effects or CIs.", "uncertainty": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Original adjustment model, marginal effect and planning material" }, { "item_id": "N12", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points", "question": "Does the analysis answer assignment, actual participation or completers?", "needed": "Analysis population, effect of interest, concomitant exposures and imputation/exclusions", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome", "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material", "criterion": "Analysis population, effect of interest, concomitant exposures and imputation/exclusions; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.", "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete", "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish assignment comparisons from adherence/completer effects", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original wording, citations and context appear in the preserved existing summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The existing evidence list supplies a 12-month comparison of the originally randomized 1,193 participants with complete register follow-up.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict", "missingness": "Do not establish detailed models, effects of actual treatment adherence or individual components. Complete register follow-up does not mean everyone participated in the intervention.", "uncertainty": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Original analysis models, actual participation and changes by arm" }, { "item_id": "N13", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points", "question": "Are low session attendance and work-outcome follow-up distinguished?", "needed": "Treatment attendance, discontinuation, reasons/timing and register follow-up", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome", "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material", "criterion": "Treatment attendance, discontinuation, reasons/timing and register follow-up; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.", "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete", "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish treatment participation from primary work-outcome follow-up", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original wording, citations and context appear in the preserved existing summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "Preserve the Korean safety statement describing 5% of AWaC participants stopping treatment before three sessions and the English original describing attendance at fewer than three sessions.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict", "missingness": "Do not calculate participant counts from 5% or turn it into clinical harm or total follow-up loss. Reasons, exposure and discontinuation differ from work records.", "uncertainty": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Treatment attendance/discontinuation, reasons and register-data flow" }, { "item_id": "N14", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points", "question": "Were the 12-month primary outcome, prespecified adjustment and planning material actually read?", "needed": "NCT, primary outcome, prespecified models, protocol, SAP and history", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome", "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material", "criterion": "NCT, primary outcome, prespecified models, protocol, SAP and history; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.", "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete", "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish preserved prespecified-planning descriptions from actual external reading", "current_reports": [ "R01", "R03" ], "existence": "Related original wording, citations and context appear in the preserved existing summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The original summary describes agreement of the objective 12-month work-participation primary outcome with NCT01146730 and prespecified adjustment. A registration citation link is also present.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict", "missingness": "Registration text/dates, protocol, SAP, multiplicity and amendment history are unread. A URL does not establish completion of review of prespecification.", "uncertainty": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Registration, plans before recruitment, SAP and amendment documents" }, { "item_id": "N15", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points", "question": "Has clinical/work importance of maintenance/restoration been newly defined?", "needed": "Prespecified importance, working hours, job satisfaction, income and functional criteria", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome", "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material", "criterion": "Prespecified importance, working hours, job satisfaction, income and functional criteria; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.", "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete", "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish statistical comparisons from gaps in importance and other outcomes", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original wording, citations and context appear in the preserved existing summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "Original proportions and effects directly concern work participation at 12 months.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict", "missingness": "Do not create minimally important clinical differences, working hours, employment quality, individual examples or economic effects absent from the summary. Actual work events do not answer every other life outcome.", "uncertainty": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Direct results on importance, working hours, function and economic outcomes" }, { "item_id": "N16", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points", "question": "Has the 18-month observation been transferred into 12-month or long-term effects?", "needed": "Comparisons, denominators, observation and analysis by time point", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome", "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material", "criterion": "Comparisons, denominators, observation and analysis by time point; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.", "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete", "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete", "proposed_research": "Display 12/18-month and long-term extension results separately", "current_reports": [ "R01", "R02" ], "existence": "Related original wording, citations and context appear in the preserved existing summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The original product information also records an 18-month observed difference of +7.8 percentage points, P=.018.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict", "missingness": "The summary has no 18-month CI, denominator or adjustment status. Do not change this into the 12-month adjusted value or long-term full-cohort confirmation.", "uncertainty": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "18-month analysis, denominators and intervals" }, { "item_id": "N17", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points", "question": "Has a favorable short-term result filled in the null full-cohort result at 10~46 months?", "needed": "Direct long-term full-cohort effects and denominators by outcome", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome", "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material", "criterion": "Direct long-term full-cohort effects and denominators by outcome; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.", "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete", "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish favorable short-term from null long-term results", "current_reports": [ "R01", "R02" ], "existence": "Related original wording, citations and context appear in the preserved existing summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The same-cohort 10~46-month extension records no significant full-cohort differences in income, work participation or months without benefits.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict", "missingness": "Do not copy the 12-month +6.2-percentage-point result as sustained full-cohort benefit or certify a null result as exactly zero/equivalence.", "uncertainty": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Original long-term full-cohort results/follow-up by outcome" }, { "item_id": "N18", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points", "question": "Has the signal in long-term benefit recipients been expanded to the full cohort?", "needed": "Subgroup definition, plans, denominators, effects and interactions", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome", "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material", "criterion": "Subgroup definition, plans, denominators, effects and interactions; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.", "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete", "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete", "proposed_research": "Display full-cohort and subgroup direct results separately", "current_reports": [ "R02" ], "existence": "Related original wording, citations and context appear in the preserved existing summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The long-term extension summary states significance only in the long-term-benefit subgroup.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict", "missingness": "Exact subgroup criteria, effects, denominators, plans and interactions are absent. Do not promote this signal to sustained full-cohort superiority.", "uncertainty": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Original subgroup plans, definitions, effects and interaction tables" }, { "item_id": "N19", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points", "question": "Are same-cohort long-term reports, registration and the two sheets independent replication?", "needed": "Linkage of original trial, extension, registration, participants and time points", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome", "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material", "criterion": "Linkage of original trial, extension, registration, participants and time points; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.", "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete", "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete", "proposed_research": "Separate citation entries from actual trial/participant units", "current_reports": [ "R01", "R02", "R03" ], "existence": "Related original wording, citations and context appear in the preserved existing summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The main AWaC report, long-term report and registration concern the same trial; both selected questions share the stored verdict 2954 summary.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict", "missingness": "Do not aggregate three citation entries, two sheets, monthly records, centers or time points into new independent trials/participants. Confirmed counts remain null.", "uncertainty": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Report, registration, time-point and participant linkage material" }, { "item_id": "N20", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points", "question": "Has complete 12-month follow-up been reused as the long-term analysis denominator?", "needed": "Measured, analyzed, linked and lost denominators at 10~46 months", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome", "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material", "criterion": "Measured, analyzed, linked and lost denominators at 10~46 months; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.", "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete", "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete", "proposed_research": "Separate actual observation/analysis scope by time point", "current_reports": [ "R02" ], "existence": "Related original wording, citations and context appear in the preserved existing summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "Acquisition of outcomes for all 1,193 participants and zero loss are original statements about the 12-month primary outcome.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict", "missingness": "Do not fill the exact long-term full-cohort analysis/follow-up denominators with those same values. Detailed long-term reporting is externally unread.", "uncertainty": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Long-term denominators, register linkage and analysis tables" }, { "item_id": "N21", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points", "question": "Have different delivery systems/vocational-advice verdicts been merged as the same effect?", "needed": "Actual comparisons of the combined service, populations and delivery systems", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome", "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material", "criterion": "Actual comparisons of the combined service, populations and delivery systems; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.", "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete", "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete", "proposed_research": "Preserve only the original related context and distinguish service-specific questions", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original wording, citations and context appear in the preserved existing summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The existing advertising interpretation says AWaC differs in delivery system/population from physiotherapist vocational advice in verdict 2944, B with 72 points. The related path is preserved in the summary.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict", "missingness": "Do not newly retrieve/check that verdict or link. Do not combine another service's effects or count it as independent replication.", "uncertainty": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Direct comparison material by delivery system/population" }, { "item_id": "N22", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points", "question": "Are public funding, center operation and evaluator roles distinguished?", "needed": "Health/Labour Ministries, NAV and evaluator roles/authority", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome", "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material", "criterion": "Health/Labour Ministries, NAV and evaluator roles/authority; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.", "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete", "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete", "proposed_research": "Display public support, service operation and evaluator roles separately", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original wording, citations and context appear in the preserved existing summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The Korean summary records full funding by the Health and Labour Ministries through the National Strategy on Work and Mental Health, NAV center operation, and independent evaluators uninvolved in center operation/treatment.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict", "missingness": "Do not merge funding, operational and evaluator roles or convert them to current independence certification. Complete authority/disclosures remain unread.", "uncertainty": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Funding, operational/evaluation roles and data-authority disclosures" }, { "item_id": "N23", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points", "question": "Are complete disclosures of author, analysis, writing and publication support available?", "needed": "Author relationships, analysis, medical writing, publication and data/publication authority", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome", "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material", "criterion": "Author relationships, analysis, medical writing, publication and data/publication authority; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.", "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete", "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish known roles from unverified complete disclosures", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original wording, citations and context appear in the preserved existing summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The stored summary describes public funding, NAV operation and evaluation independence.", "condition_status": "Unverified", "status_reason": "Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict", "missingness": "Do not certify every unmentioned item as absent, including company product support, employee authors, outsourced analysis, writing or publication fees.", "uncertainty": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Author/supporter, data and publication disclosures" }, { "item_id": "N24", "question_type": "Supplementary harm evidence", "question": "Were prespecified safety outcomes or serious-adverse-event tables reported?", "needed": "Harm plans, definitions, collection, arm-specific events and denominators", "role": "Supplementary", "role_reason": "Supplementary condition revealing harm collection, exposure and population scope separately from efficacy", "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material", "criterion": "Harm plans, definitions, collection, arm-specific events and denominators; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.", "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete", "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish acquisition of work records from safety-data collection", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original wording, citations and context appear in the preserved existing summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The existing safety explanation states no prespecified safety outcome or serious-adverse-event comparison table was reported.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict", "missingness": "Do not turn unverified harms into zero events, service safety or equivalence to control. Complete register work-outcome follow-up differs from complete harm collection.", "uncertainty": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Harm plans, arm-specific events, exposure and discontinuation tables" }, { "item_id": "N25", "question_type": "Supplementary harm evidence", "question": "Can high-risk exclusions and 5% low attendance certify harms?", "needed": "High-risk groups, discontinuation reasons, events, causes and follow-up", "role": "Supplementary", "role_reason": "Supplementary condition revealing harm collection, exposure and population scope separately from efficacy", "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material", "criterion": "High-risk groups, discontinuation reasons, events, causes and follow-up; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.", "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete", "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish intervention participation from harms and applicability limits", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original wording, citations and context appear in the preserved existing summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "Original information excludes high suicide risk, severe mental illness and active substance use, and describes 5% of AWaC participants stopping before three treatment sessions.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict", "missingness": "Do not calculate harm incidence from 5% or fill in safety/treatment efficacy for excluded groups. Do not create new treatment instructions.", "uncertainty": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Excluded populations, attendance/discontinuation reasons and event data" }, { "item_id": "N26", "question_type": "Supplementary harm evidence", "question": "Do long-term/rare harms and clinical symptoms require separate evidence?", "needed": "Long-term exposure, events, symptoms, function and follow-up denominators", "role": "Supplementary", "role_reason": "Supplementary condition revealing harm collection, exposure and population scope separately from efficacy", "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material", "criterion": "Long-term exposure, events, symptoms, function and follow-up denominators; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.", "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete", "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete", "proposed_research": "Separate work participation from gaps in clinical/safety outcomes", "current_reports": [ "R01", "R02" ], "existence": "Related original wording, citations and context appear in the preserved existing summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "Original safety is Unknown; primary work outcomes and the long-term work extension are separate.", "condition_status": "Unverified", "status_reason": "Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict", "missingness": "Favorable work-participation results or null long-term results cannot establish mental-health cure, long-term safety or absence of rare harms.", "uncertainty": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Direct material on long-term harms, clinical symptoms and function" }, { "item_id": "N27", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points", "question": "Is actual summary reading distinguished from unread external papers/registration?", "needed": "Each citation, original registration URL, preservation and access status", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome", "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material", "criterion": "Each citation, original registration URL, preservation and access status; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.", "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete", "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete", "proposed_research": "Display summary reading separately from unread external material by type", "current_reports": [ "R01", "R02", "R03" ], "existence": "Related original wording, citations and context appear in the preserved existing summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The complete parent stored summary was read. Main/long-term PubMed URLs and the official registration URL are linked as original citations.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict", "missingness": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol, SAP, links and screens were not read/checked. A URL's presence does not establish reading or quality certification.", "uncertainty": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Main/long-term reports, registration and planning material" }, { "item_id": "N28", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy, work participation and time points", "question": "Are original history/selected-verdict linkage separated from production and content review?", "needed": "Parent Korean/English text, axes, dates, corrections, selected row and freezing/application", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition separating direct material and gaps for the selected time point, full cohort/subgroups and work outcome", "application_exception": "Other time points, subgroups, questionnaires, services or denominators do not fill unresolved information in the selected material", "criterion": "Parent Korean/English text, axes, dates, corrections, selected row and freezing/application; preserve only original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, verdicts, calculations or independence certification.", "basis": "Linkage to preserved methodology-application records; full-definition content review and official certification incomplete", "condition_origin": "Chamgap-specific application condition; review of existing content incomplete", "proposed_research": "Record original verdicts/corrections separately from production and review of existing content", "current_reports": [ "R01", "R02", "R03" ], "existence": "Related original wording, citations and context appear in the preserved existing summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "Preserve parent Korean/English text, axes, reference date 2026-08-26, empty corrections/deliberation and the selected row within the whole stored summary. Original candidate review-pending/production-eligibility flags are historical.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Stored-summary information, scope and gaps displayed; not completed content review or a new clinical verdict", "missingness": "Keep absent subclaim score/status/axes and the reference date; do not activate review waiting. Existing-content review remains incomplete, completion flags false, new units 0 and confirmed independence count unrecorded.", "uncertainty": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculations or clinical-content review performed", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Original stored summary, existing selection and condition/application events" } ], "reports": [ { "report_id": "R01", "title": "Reme SE, et al. Occup Environ Med. 2015. PMID: 26251065.", "url": "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26251065/", "report_type": "Stored summary of the original-trial paper citation", "existence": "Present in actual citations/related wording of the stored summary", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external abstracts, full texts, registration and plans unread", "independent_replication": "Same-cohort/registration linkage; not certification of unique trials/participants or independent replication", "observed_result": "The grade is B with 76 points. In AWaC, maintained/increased work participation at 12 months was 44.2% versus 37.2%, unadjusted difference 6.9 percentage points (P=.015), and prespecified covariate-adjusted marginal effect +6.2 percentage points (95% CI +0.5~+11.8).", "result_level": "AWaC objective 12-month work participation; original proportions/unadjusted/adjusted effects and complete register follow-up for the primary outcome", "source_evidence_date": "2026-08-26", "materials": [ { "material_type": "Stored summary", "public_status": "Summary read", "access_status": "Stored summary read", "acquired": true, "actually_read": "Summary read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry" }, { "material_type": "External abstract", "public_status": "Not read", "access_status": "External material unread", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry" }, { "material_type": "External full text", "public_status": "Not read", "access_status": "External material unread", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry" }, { "material_type": "Original registration", "public_status": "Not read", "access_status": "External material unread", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry" }, { "material_type": "Protocol/SAP", "public_status": "Not read", "access_status": "External material unread", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry" } ], "links": [ { "label": "PubMed", "url": "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26251065/" } ] }, { "report_id": "R02", "title": "Long-term effects on income and sickness benefits after work-focused CBT and individual job support. PMID: 30032103.", "url": "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30032103/", "report_type": "Stored summary of the same trial’s long-term paper citation", "existence": "Present in actual citations/related wording of the stored summary", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external abstracts, full texts, registration and plans unread", "independent_replication": "Same-cohort/registration linkage; not certification of unique trials/participants or independent replication", "observed_result": "The same-cohort 10~46-month extension found no significant full-cohort differences in income, work participation or months without benefits; only the long-term-benefit subgroup was significant. The established result concerns the full cohort at 12 months, not persistence of effect.", "result_level": "Same AWaC 10~46-month extension: null full-cohort results and long-term-benefit subgroup context; long-term denominators/original values unverified", "source_evidence_date": "2026-08-26", "materials": [ { "material_type": "Stored summary", "public_status": "Summary read", "access_status": "Stored summary read", "acquired": true, "actually_read": "Summary read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry" }, { "material_type": "External abstract", "public_status": "Not read", "access_status": "External material unread", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry" }, { "material_type": "External full text", "public_status": "Not read", "access_status": "External material unread", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry" }, { "material_type": "Original registration", "public_status": "Not read", "access_status": "External material unread", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry" }, { "material_type": "Protocol/SAP", "public_status": "Not read", "access_status": "External material unread", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry" } ], "links": [ { "label": "PubMed", "url": "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30032103/" } ] }, { "report_id": "R03", "title": "NCT01146730. At Work and Coping.", "url": "https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01146730", "report_type": "Stored summary of the official registration citation", "existence": "Present in actual citations/related wording of the stored summary", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external abstracts, full texts, registration and plans unread", "independent_replication": "Same-cohort/registration linkage; not certification of unique trials/participants or independent replication", "observed_result": "Trial registration material.", "result_level": "Same AWaC registration citation; original planning text unread, not a new clinical results report", "source_evidence_date": "2026-08-26", "materials": [ { "material_type": "Stored summary", "public_status": "Summary read", "access_status": "Stored summary read", "acquired": true, "actually_read": "Summary read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry" }, { "material_type": "External abstract", "public_status": "Not read", "access_status": "External material unread", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry" }, { "material_type": "External full text", "public_status": "Not read", "access_status": "External material unread", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry" }, { "material_type": "Original registration", "public_status": "Not read", "access_status": "External material unread", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry" }, { "material_type": "Protocol/SAP", "public_status": "Not read", "access_status": "External material unread", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "Material entries do not establish external acquisition, reading, checked links or unique-trial/participant certification; the official registration URL is linked only to its registration entry" } ], "links": [ { "label": "Official source", "url": "https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01146730" } ] } ], "method_sources": [ { "id": "M03", "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08", "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-03", "section": "§3.1, §3.2.1–3.2.3, MECIR C5/C7/C13", "official_principle": "Clearly record the question, eligibility conditions and reasons for changes, and distinguish variations in interventions.", "review_level": "Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited" }, { "id": "M04", "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5.1 (2025), chapter updated 2025-03", "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-04", "section": "§4.5, §4.6.1–4.6.3, MECIR C42", "official_principle": "Distinguish studies from reports and link them; do not omit a study solely because results are unreported.", "review_level": "Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited" }, { "id": "M08", "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10", "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-08", "section": "§8.1–8.2.3, Table 8.2.a", "official_principle": "Define the outcome and effect of interest, then examine randomization, deviations, missing data, measurement and selective reporting.", "review_level": "Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited" }, { "id": "M15", "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08", "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-15", "section": "§15.2.4, §15.3.1–15.3.3", "official_principle": "Distinguish effect estimates, intervals, importance and applicability. Sample size alone does not determine precision.", "review_level": "Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited" }, { "id": "M19", "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10", "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-19", "section": "§19.1.2, §19.2.1–19.2.4", "official_principle": "Harm questions may require different designs, populations and follow-up from efficacy questions. Case reports do not establish incidence rates.", "review_level": "Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited" } ], "status_dictionary": { "Partly verified": "Some information exists in the preserved review summary; detailed original materials remain unverified. This does not certify a passed review or clinical efficacy.", "Unverified": "Detailed materials for the selected condition could not be established within the stored scope; this does not mean zero effect, zero studies or safety", "Review incomplete": "Review of existing content incomplete", "Met": "Use only within the relevant conditions after existing content review; no automatic designation in this preparation", "Not reported": "Distinguish only within materials actually read; do not turn unread external materials into unreported findings", "Inaccessible": "Not applied during this preparation because actual access was not tested", "Not applicable": "Use with a reason for non-applicability based on an explicit question boundary", "Conflicting data": "Judge after actual material comparison; review was not performed during this preparation", "Insufficient evidence for the conditions": "Do not use as a clinical grade encompassing currently unread materials" }, "study_overlap": { "state": "Unverified", "unique_trial_count": null, "unique_participant_count": null, "reason": "Main/long-term AWaC reports and registration linked by the original stored summary; three citations, repeated monthly records, arms and sibling sheets are not totaled as new trials/participants" }, "history": [ { "date": "2026-10-12", "kind": "Separation of public-facing pages and materials", "view_version": "1.0", "change": "Public reader pages and material were prepared from the existing 28 items. No new clinical searches, verification-state changes or scoring were performed." } ], "language": "en", "translation_date": "2026-10-12" }