CHAMGAP
Verdict No. 3137 · Search date 2026-09-17 · Methodology v1.0

Oral single-ingredient NR and endurance performance: benefit in trained adults is not established

30-Second Summary
D
Evidence Grade D · 28 · Safety caution
ChatGPT source review and self-verification · Codex technical integration
One independent claim completed; published muscle-mass 3135 and strength 3136 records unchanged.
Caution: performance studies have limited adverse-event reporting and exposure. The reused 10-week MCI record reports 18 events in 7/10 NR participants versus 21 in 7/10 placebo participants, and temporary dose reduction for nausea/heartburn in one NR participant; these are not causal athlete risk estimates. Long-term, pregnancy/lactation, pediatric, hepatic/renal and co-use safety is not established. Study regimens are not personal dosing instructions. [S06]
What the
research shows
Evidence does not establish improved endurance performance, especially sport-specific time trials, from oral single-ingredient NR in trained adults. A cycling thesis excluding endurance-trained athletes reports, in 10 paired analyses, NR 819.5+/-239.8 seconds versus placebo 823.4+/-250.0 seconds (SD), P=0.72, but its abstract reverses the condition labels. This does not establish exact zero, equivalence, or exclusion of benefit. [S01]
What the
ads claim
NAD, fat-oxidation or local fatigue changes alone do not establish trained-adult time-trial improvement in these sources. This is not a quotation from a specific advertisement or a legal finding.

Four separate assessment dimensions

Effect direction and sizeEvidence does not establish improved endurance performance, especially sport-specific time trials, from oral single-ingredient NR in trained adults. A cycling thesis excluding endurance-trained athletes reports, in 10 paired analyses, NR 819.5+/-239.8 seconds versus placebo 823.4+/-250.0 seconds (SD), P=0.72, but its abstract reverses the condition labels. This does not establish exact zero, equivalence, or exclusion of benefit. [S01]
Evidence certaintyLimited and indirect evidence; not a formal GRADE category
ApplicabilityThe 5 km TT is population-indirect with conflicting condition labels and no verified paired CI. Local fatigue, VO2 and time to exhaustion are not time trials. [S01,S03-S05]
SafetyCaution

The supplied unchanged calculator gives P/R1/I1/E0/B2/CX -> D; zero strengths -> fixed anchor 28. E0 codes the nonsignificant TT comparison, not exact zero effect.

*

Useful facts when choosing a product

  • NR is not merged with nicotinic acid, nicotinamide, NMN, NAD+ or NRH.
  • NR plus pterostilbene is not single NR. [S12]
  • Gray used 1000 mg once; Dolopikou 500 mg once; Stocks 1000 mg/day for one week; Martens 1000 mg/day for six weeks per condition. These are study regimens, not dosing recommendations. [S01-S04]
  • Martens explicitly used chloride; other study salts and counterion-free active amounts were not inferred from a brand.
  • Unverified deficiency diagnosis and total B3 intake do not prove nutritional sufficiency.
ID

Chamgap Semantic Classification Code

Permanent code issued

S.nicotinamide-riboside.oral.trained-adults-endurance-performance.improve.placebo-or-matched-care

Supplements and nutraceuticals > Nicotinamide riboside > Oral > Trained adults; endurance exercise performance > Improvement claim > Placebo or study-specific matched care

Technical binding of unchanged ChatGPT D/28, Caution and declared study-specific boundaries. The code identifies the intervention and claim; it never contains the evidence grade, score, or safety result.

Download semantic index (JSON) · Codebook v1

Exact Claim Classification

These independent facets prevent evidence from different forms, routes, populations, effects, and comparators from being mixed.

Intervention classS · Supplement or nutraceutical
Canonical ingredient or interventionnicotinamide riboside
Source or part usedpurified chemical; botanical species/part not applicable
Formulation or processingoral single NR; salt/active amount study-specific
Routeoral
Dosestudy-specific acute500/1000mg or1000mg/day; not a dosing instruction
Durationsingle dose/oneweek/sixweekspercondition; separated by study
Populationproposed: trained adults; actual activity/age/sex kept study-specific
Effect or conditionimproved endurance exercise performance
Primary endpointpage preference: standardized sport-specific TT completion time; distinct from registered primary
Comparatoractual placebo and identical exercise-test conditions, study-specific
Duplicate-detection keyS|nicotinamide-riboside|oral-single-ingredient|trained-adults|endurance-performance|sport-specific-time-trial|placebo
01

What the research actually shows

# Oral single-ingredient NR and endurance performance: benefit in trained adults is not established

TASK-1021 / R01-061 | Same-chat task 3/5 | Evidence cutoff 2026-09-17 (KST)

## 30-second answer

**Evidence does not establish that oral single-ingredient nicotinamide riboside (NR) improves endurance exercise performance, particularly sport-specific time-trial performance, in trained adults.** The small thesis that directly tested a 5 km cycling time trial excluded endurance-trained athletes. In 10 paired analyses, its main text reports NR 819.5+/-239.8 seconds versus placebo 823.4+/-250.0 seconds (SD), P=0.72; the abstract reverses the condition labels. This does not establish exact zero, equivalence, or applicability to trained adults. [S01](https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/8925/13/Gray2019MScbyRes.pdf)

An older-men local repeated-contraction fatigue signal, measured/predicted VO2max, time to exhaustion, and metabolism during fixed-workload exercise are separate endpoints. None was recoded as a time-trial improvement. **The current efficacy judgment is D, fixed score 28; safety Caution; kind/category S / sports.** This is the supplied Chamgap rule-based index, not a probability of success or official GRADE score. [S02](https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/JP280825) [S03](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330914286_Acute_nicotinamide_riboside_supplementation_improves_redox_homeostasis_and_exercise_performance_in_old_individuals_a_double-blind_cross-over_study) [S04](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-03421-7) [S05](https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41467-018-03421-7/MediaObjects/41467_2018_3421_MOESM1_ESM.pdf) [Calculation audit](calculation_audit.json)

## 1. Question and completed-record boundaries

The proposed question is **trained adults -> oral single-ingredient NR -> endurance exercise performance -> standardized time-trial completion time -> the actual placebo/appropriate comparator**. Proposed population and formulation are not observed study facts. Cycling, running, and swimming times are not pooled. Faster completion and longer time to exhaustion have opposite favorable directions. Botanical species/parts do not apply to this purified chemical question; salt and active amount are study-specific.

All 3136 index records and the seven supplied originals, 314/929/1068/3093/3094/3135/3136, were examined for duplication. Their completed claims concern NAD+/aging, subjective fatigue/energy, glucose metabolism, gait in frail older adults, cognition, muscle mass, and strength. No exact completed independent claim for the present sport-performance question was identified: operation is `new`. Existing extraction, searches, and source maps were reused without rewriting or regrading earlier clinical content. The current supplied technical record confirms actual subsequent publication of 3135 and 3136; unassigned statuses in original manifests are historical. [Duplicate/completion audit](duplicate_audit.json)

## 2. Actual study conditions

| Study / access | Actual participants and training | Single NR, route, regimen, comparator | Shared exercise, endpoint and denominator | |---|---|---|---| | Gray, repository 2019 / original thesis PDF and figures | 11 healthy men, age 24.91+/-2.34 years(SD). At least 150 min moderate or 75 min vigorous activity/week. **Endurance-trained athletes excluded**; eligible VO2max<60; baseline 43.8+/-6.50 mL/kg/min(SD) | Oral 1000 mg once, four 250 mg capsules the preceding evening approximately 12 h before exercise. NIAGEN named, but **study-specific salt/counterion-free active amount unverified**. Microcrystalline-cellulose placebo; >=1 week crossover interval. Approximately 4 weeks/5 visits is not 4 weeks of dosing | 60 min cycling at 55% baseline VO2max, 2 min rest, then 5 km self-paced cycling TT. Two familiarizations. Eleven randomized orders; one equipment-failure exclusion; **10 paired TT analyses** | | Stocks 2021 / primary abstract, author PDF inaccessible | Eight men, age 23+/-4; VO2peak 46.5+/-4.4 mL/kg/min. Specialized training status not verified from accessible abstract | Oral 1000 mg/day NR for **1 week** versus cellulose; double-blind crossover. Salt/active equivalent/washout unverified from abstract | **60 min at 60% Wmax**; muscle biopsies before/immediately/3 h after. A fixed-duration metabolic experiment, not a TT or TTE efficacy test | | Dolopikou, online 2019 / 2020; author full-text HTML/table | Twelve young men 22.9+/-1.0 years and 12 older men 71.5+/-1.0 years(SEM). Described as recreationally trained, yet recent 2 week regular resistance/aerobic activity is also excluded. Not established endurance athletes | Oral **500 mg once**, two 250 mg capsules, tests approximately **2 h** later. Life Extension product; salt/active equivalent unverified. Identical lactose placebo. **10 days is washout**, not repeated treatment | Same dynamometer/cycling tests; no training program. Twelve paired participants per age group. Local fatigue and VO2 measures are not a TT | | Martens 2018 / original and supplement | Healthy men and women aged 55-79, not a recruited trained-sport cohort. Thirty randomized; 24 completed; **aerobic figure n = 21** | Explicit oral **NR chloride**, 500 mg twice/day=1000 mg/day, **6 weeks per condition**, placebo; no separate crossover washout. Counterion-free active equivalent unreported | Modified Balke graded treadmill VO2max and time to exhaustion. No additional common training program. Actual Supplementary Figure 2A/B; not a fixed-distance TT |

Original locations: Gray printed pp 27-39/48-49, Figure 11, p 57; Stocks abstract; Dolopikou Participants/test methods/Table 3; Martens Methods and actual Supplementary Figure 2. [S01](https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/8925/13/Gray2019MScbyRes.pdf) [S02](https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/JP280825) [S03](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330914286_Acute_nicotinamide_riboside_supplementation_improves_redox_homeostasis_and_exercise_performance_in_old_individuals_a_double-blind_cross-over_study) [S04](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-03421-7) [S05](https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41467-018-03421-7/MediaObjects/41467_2018_3421_MOESM1_ESM.pdf)

## 3. Separated numeric evidence

| Outcome | NR / placebo or contrast | Analysis, time and interpretation | |---|---|---| | **Gray 5 km cycling completion time**, lower is better | **819.5+/-239.8 / 823.4+/-250.0 seconds(SD)**; paired n = 10 | After the overnight single dose and fixed exercise; paired t test **P=0.72**. Arithmetic **-3.9 seconds(NR-placebo)** uses rounded main-text means; it is not an author-reported adjusted effect or verified paired CI. Abstract condition labels are reversed; original data/correction resolution is unavailable | | Gray fixed-ride power | 136+/-11 W | Prescribed 60 min workload, **not TT mean power**. Initial VO2max is a baseline characteristic, not a treatment effect | | Dolopikou older local fatigue index | **36.3+/-1.1 / 42.6+/-1.4**, mean+/-SEM; 12 paired men | Thirty maximal concentric knee contractions at 180 degrees/s; index from last 5/first 5 torque ratio, in percent; **lower is better**. Body/table **P=0.013**, abstract **P=0.012**. Difference column **-4.9+/-8.5**, 95% CI **-10.3 to 0.5**, conflicts with arithmetic **-6.3 percentage points**; CI includes zero. Retained as conflicting | | Dolopikou young local fatigue index | 36.8+/-1.9 / 38.9+/-1.5 SEM; n = 12 | P=0.369; difference column-2.1, 95% CI-6.8 to 2.8. Not a whole-body TT benefit | | Dolopikou young directly measured VO2max | 46.9 /49.1 mL/kg/min; n = 12 | P=0.455. Dispersion decimal points in accessible HTML are unreliable; SEM was not silently reconstructed | | Dolopikou older **YMCA-predicted VO2max** | 33.0 /30.7 mL/kg/min; n = 12 | P=0.507. Not labeled direct maximal oxygen measurement. Table CI/contrast correspondence remains unresolved and is not used for TT precision | | Martens VO2max / time to exhaustion | mL/kg/min /minutes; **paired n = 21** for each | Six weeks per condition; authors report no significant aerobic-performance effect. Actual Supplementary Figure 2 shows mean+/-SD without precise condition means/paired effects/CI labels; bar heights were not converted into invented numbers. Different from a fixed-distance TT |

[S01](https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/8925/13/Gray2019MScbyRes.pdf) [S03](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330914286_Acute_nicotinamide_riboside_supplementation_improves_redox_homeostasis_and_exercise_performance_in_old_individuals_a_double-blind_cross-over_study) [S04](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-03421-7) [S05](https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41467-018-03421-7/MediaObjects/41467_2018_3421_MOESM1_ESM.pdf) [Structured extraction](study_extraction.json)

**Conflicts:** Gray's Results, Discussion and Figure 11 direction agree, so the main-text assignment is the conditional working value while the opposite abstract assignment is retained. This is not a substitute for an author correction. P=0.85 compares first versus second experimental visits, not NR versus placebo. Nonsignificance also does not establish that familiarization/order effects were completely eliminated. The positive older-men local-fatigue report is retained, but unresolved correspondence among means, difference, CI and P prevents treating it as a clean effect estimate or a TT benefit. [Correction/conflict log](correction_log.json)

## 4. Primary-outcome hierarchy, design and funding

Gray states two hypotheses, fat oxidation and TT, without verified agreement to a registered single primary endpoint and prospective analysis plan. A third researcher generated the computer-randomized order and A/B capsule codes, disclosed after analyses. Thus allocation-concealment implementation was documented, not declared absent. One equipment-failure exclusion is reported; 10 pairs are not 20 independent participants. An accepted thesis is not represented as a peer-reviewed journal article. [S01](https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/8925/13/Gray2019MScbyRes.pdf)

Dolopikou has multiple redox/performance aims without an identified unique prospective registered primary hierarchy. The completed 3136 strength judgment was not reopened; the new extraction concerns repeated-contraction fatigue and VO2. Martens mainly addresses safety/NAD, with exploratory physiological performance. NCT02921659 is confirmed in the paper, but the official registry page yielded only a shell, so full original registration agreement is unverified. The Stocks abstract does not establish complete primary-outcome, concealment, funding or adverse-event reporting. [S02](https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/JP280825) [S03](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330914286_Acute_nicotinamide_riboside_supplementation_improves_redox_homeostasis_and_exercise_performance_in_old_individuals_a_double-blind_cross-over_study) [S04](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-03421-7)

Commercial product use and the repository funding field do not fully establish Gray's financial independence. Dolopikou's no-conflict declaration does not prove complete funding independence. Martens' public support plus ChromaDex contribution/product record was reused. Product identity, funding verification and bias assessment remain separate. [S01](https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/8925/13/Gray2019MScbyRes.pdf) [S03](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330914286_Acute_nicotinamide_riboside_supplementation_improves_redox_homeostasis_and_exercise_performance_in_old_individuals_a_double-blind_cross-over_study) [S04](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-03421-7)

## 5. Nutrition and safety

This is an additional-supplementation question, not treatment of diagnosed deficiency. Gray replicated a preceding-day food diary, required an overnight fast, and restricted exercise/caffeine/alcohol/other supplements for 24 h. Dolopikou used the same 3-day diet and reported no other medications/nutritional supplements. Neither establishes quantified total dietary B3/NR or a diagnostic deficiency test; nutritional sufficiency was not assumed proven. Unverified diet/vitamin co-use for Stocks and Martens is retained in the structured extraction. Lower older-person NAD-related redox values are not an NR-deficiency diagnosis; Gray's planned PBMC NAD results were not reported. Specific laboratory-test interference is not established by these records. [S01](https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/8925/13/Gray2019MScbyRes.pdf) [S02](https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/JP280825) [S03](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330914286_Acute_nicotinamide_riboside_supplementation_improves_redox_homeostasis_and_exercise_performance_in_old_individuals_a_double-blind_cross-over_study) [S04](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-03421-7)

**Safety: Caution.** The TT source lacks an analyzable adverse-event table, and adjacent performance studies are short or involve other populations. The existing primary extraction from the MCI trial is reused for safety only: over 10 weeks, 18 events in 7 of 10 NR participants versus 21 events in 7 of 10 placebo participants. Events and affected people are different denominators. One NR participant had a temporary dose reduction for severe nausea/heartburn; this does not estimate causal risk or incidence in athletes. The prior record's severity/seriousness terminology limitation is preserved rather than asserting that all events were mild. [S06](https://www.brennerlab.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Orr23.pdf) (Exact current input, previous TASK-1020, S06 extraction reused.)

Short-term tolerability is not extrapolated to long-term high-dose use, pregnancy/lactation, children, liver/kidney disease, or multiple-drug use. The 500 mg/1000 mg regimens are study conditions, not personal dosing instructions. Missing active-amount or batch-specific chemical information was not filled by inferring a salt from the brand.

## 6. Counterevidence, adjacent findings and current screening

The older-men positive local-fatigue result is retained as counterevidence. Its small male population, acute dosing, training qualifiers and numeric inconsistencies prevent a conclusion about endurance records in trained adults. Martens' nonsignificant TTE/VO2 and Stocks' fixed-workload metabolic findings were not counted as repeated TT refutations; a small benefit is not excluded. [S02](https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/JP280825) [S03](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330914286_Acute_nicotinamide_riboside_supplementation_improves_redox_homeostasis_and_exercise_performance_in_old_individuals_a_double-blind_cross-over_study) [S04](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-03421-7)

Heikkinen 2026 reanalyzes the existing Lapatto NR twin cohort for epigenetic outcomes alongside **separate HIIT cohorts**. VO2 changes in different exercise cohorts were not attributed to an NR+exercise placebo-controlled intervention. Lin 2025 studies 6 week NR/walking in sedentary older hypertensive adults with daytime SBP primary. For the 2026 Friedreich ataxia publication, only the primary indexed title/identifiers were verified; the clinical-population boundary was retained without filling inaccessible dose or numeric results. [S07](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acel.70638) [S09](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11357-025-01815-2) [S10](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42009009/)

Zone2Training NCT07344636 is a potentially relevant registered lead, but the official shell/API did not expose current result or primary-outcome fields. We do not assert that results are absent, or import current recruitment/sample details from mirrors as primary-verified facts. Accessible official results are a revision trigger. The NMN runner trial and NR+pterostilbene study are excluded for molecular/combination mismatch. Existing Werner, cancer-survivor, transplant-survivor, frailty, muscle-mass and gait records retain their independent endpoint boundaries. [S08](https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07344636) [S11](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12970-021-00442-4) [S12](https://insight.jci.org/articles/view/158314) [S13-S19 source map](sources.json)

## 7. Final rule application and classification

**Axes: P / R1 / I1 / E0 / B2 / CX.** Clinical claim type B; `no_human_study=false`; big-hard-endpoint RCT, split-coprimary and failed-primary/positive-secondary flags are false. An unverified hierarchy was not treated as a known primary failure.

P means actual functional performance; R1 indicates no verified independent replication of the target question; I1 follows supplied case 29 for unconfirmed funding independence. E0 codes the observed nonsignificant adjacent TT result, not exact zero. B2 follows the supplied small-study criterion(total 11,<200) plus unverified registered-primary/analysis agreement(case 44). Acute dosing is not additionally penalized as inadequate chronic follow-up. Condition-label conflict is separately disclosed. CX means no verified paired treatment-difference CI, not C1 exclusion of benefit. Funding and CI issues were not counted again as bias defects.

Executing the supplied unchanged `derive_grade.py` E0 branch yields **D**. None of H/R2/I2/E+/C1/B0/big-hard-endpoint flags is a strength: **0 strengths -> supplied D anchor 28**. No override or invented rule was used. Separate document quality is **A**, meaning same-author checks of sources, numbers, boundaries, bilingual parity and format; not independent external review or journal certification. [Calculation and original clauses](calculation_audit.json) [Classification](classification_audit.json)

## 8. Search scope, uncertainty, revision and completion

Actual search date was 2026-09-17 KST. Web-engine queries combined English/Korean NR names with time trial/time-trial, endurance, trained, athletes, cycling, exhaustion, deficiency, years, authors, DOIs and registry IDs, while reusing the prior NR source map. University repositories, publishers, author-provided originals, supplementary PDFs and official PubMed/ClinicalTrials.gov identification pages were accessed. Queries are in [search_log.json](search_log.json). No exhaustive Embase/Cochrane/Web of Science search, fabricated PRISMA counts, or inaccessible primary numeric results are claimed. Correction/retraction searches did not yield a verified resolution; this is not a guarantee that no correction/retraction exists.

Remaining information states include conflicting condition labels/CI, inaccessible registrations or full texts, and missing nutrition, salt/active-amount and long-term safety information. **The completed narrow conclusion is that oral single-NR improvement of sport-specific endurance records in trained adults is not established.** A prespecified same-population/same-intervention TT trial, original paired data or correction, official posted results, interpretable effect CIs, or relevant long-term safety could trigger revision while preserving the eventual published ID. These limitations do not defer this manuscript or assign new clinical-value/grade decisions to the recipient.

`result_status=completed_with_uncertainty`; `publication_status=needs_id_assignment`; `content_verification_status=completed_with_declared_scope`. **The new ID, slug, URL and first_published_at remain unassigned.** This does not undo 3135/3136 publication. No server connection, deployment or next TASK was performed. No additional image was necessary to understand this evidence, so no clinical illustration was created.

02

Why this is classified as D (28)

The supplied unchanged calculator gives P/R1/I1/E0/B2/CX -> D; zero strengths -> fixed anchor 28. E0 codes the nonsignificant TT comparison, not exact zero effect.

Counterpoint. A positive local-fatigue signal and a possible small benefit remain, but do not establish endurance improvement in trained adults.

Rejudgment record. Same-author source, numeric and rule check; not independent consensus — P/R1/I1/E0/B2/CX; supplied unchanged calculator; zero-strength D fixed anchor 28

Stored scoring profile
EndpointPSymptom or function itself is the target - including patient reports and performance tests
Case application: P: timed functional performance, consistent with the supplied endpoint rule; not a biochemical surrogate merely because it is objectively measured.
ReplicationR1Single confirmatory trial
Case application: R1: no verified independent replication of the same target PICO. This is a limited coding of one adjacent-population TT study, not a claim of confirmatory efficacy. Local fatigue and fixed-workload metabolic studies do not establish R2 or RX.
IndependenceI1Mixed funding sources
Case application: I1: funding independence of the decisive thesis is not fully established; supplied case29 assigns unknown funding to I1 with disclosure. A commercial brand alone proves neither I0 nor I2.
Effect sizeE0Null
Case application: E0: code for the reported nonsignificant adjacent human TT comparison (P=0.72), not exact zero, equivalence, or established inefficacy in trained adults. This uses an observed result, not mere absence of access.
PrecisionCXNo pooled confidence interval could be confirmed
Case application: CX: no verified paired TT treatment-difference CI or paired raw/change-dispersion data. Independent-group CI calculations from condition SDs are inappropriate.

Stored derived and displayed grades match; this is not a current recalculation or validity check (D).

Review performed and remaining limitations

Same-author verification completed within declared limits

In 12 older men the local fatigue result favors NR at P=0.013 (abstract 0.012), but the difference column -4.9 and 95% CI -10.3 to 0.5 do not reconcile with the -6.3 percentage-point arithmetic mean difference. The signal is retained without extrapolation to time trials. [S03]

Preliminary RoB 2-informed review — not a complete formal assessment
RandomizationGray: thirdresearcher computer-randomized A/B; code disclosed after analyses. Dolopikou/Stocks detailed implementation not fully confirmed.
Deviations from assigned interventionsNo extra training benefit attributed to NR; protocol workloads kept separate.
Missing outcome dataGray TT10of11 due equipment; Martens aerobic21 versus24completed/30randomized.
Outcome measurementActual timed performance separated from local torque fatigue, measured/predicted VO2 and TTE.
Selection of the reported resultGray abstract/body labels; Dolopikou P/CI/difference; unconfirmed registered primary agreement.
Reasons for the certainty judgment — not formal GRADE
Risk of biasB2: the TT has 11 participants, meeting the supplied axis6 small-study (<200) item, plus no verified report of prospectively registered primary-outcome/analysis agreement under case44. Acute dosing itself is not penalized as insufficient chronic follow-up. The abstract/body condition-label conflict is also disclosed.
InconsistencyDifferent endpoints not pooled; internal numeric conflicts disclosed rather than called between-trial R0.
IndirectnessThe 5 km TT is population-indirect with conflicting condition labels and no verified paired CI. Local fatigue, VO2 and time to exhaustion are not time trials. [S01,S03-S05]
ImprecisionCX: no verified paired TT treatment-difference CI or paired raw/change-dispersion data. Independent-group CI calculations from condition SDs are inappropriate.
Publication biasNo formal publication-bias test; small sparse evidence and gray literature; selective nonpublication cannot be excluded.

Search scope and limitations. search_log.json: 37 targeted queries; prior current-input source map reused; no exhaustive subscription-database review

03

Evidence Table

StudyDesignSampleFundingEndpointResultWeight
Gray 5 km cycling TT thesisRandomized double-blind crossover11 randomized orders;10pairedTTFull funding independence unconfirmed5 km completion time(seconds), lower is betterBody NR819.5+/-239.8 vsPL823.4+/-250.0SD,P=.72;abstractlabelsreversed;CIunverifiedDirect endpoint, indirect population; limited decisive evidence
Stocks fixed-workload cycling metabolic studyRandomized double-blind crossover; abstract access8menUnverified60min60%Wmax; metabolic responseNot a TT/TTE efficacy testBoundary/mechanistic adjacent record
Dolopikou local fatigue and VO2Acute randomized double-blind crossover12young/12olderFull independence unconfirmedLocal fatigue; directly measured/predictedVO2 separateOlderfatigueP=.013,CI-10.3to0.5;mean/differenceconflict;notTTPositive adjacent signal retained
Martens aerobic capacity and TTEPlacebo-controlled crossover6weeks/condition30randomized/24completed/21aerobicPublic+ChromaDex contributionVO2max and treadmill TTENonsignificant author report;actualSupplementFig2A/B;exactnumbersunreportedIndirectpopulation/test;notpooledasTT
§

Receipt — 19 References

Evidence access cutoff: 2026-09-17. Each citation states its actual access level (full-text transcription, abstract, index, or other) and remaining limitations. Bibliographic checking does not certify the study results or treatment efficacy.

Gray (2019 repository; thesis title page 2018). The effects of acute nicotinamide riboside supplementation on substrate utilisation and 5km time-trial performance
printed pp26-39 methods; pp48-49 TT results/Fig11; p57 discussion; PDF zero-based pages36-49,58-59,67 primary_university_thesis_full_PDF_text_and_screenshots
checked
Stocks et al. (2021). Nicotinamide riboside supplementation does not alter whole-body or skeletal muscle metabolic responses to a single bout of endurance exercise
Abstract/Key points; attempted author manuscript via Birmingham repository publisher_primary_abstract; author_PDF_fetch_failed
checked
Dolopikou et al. (2020; online2019). Acute nicotinamide riboside supplementation improves redox homeostasis and exercise performance in old individuals: a double-blind cross-over study
Participants; exercise tests; Table3; Performance; Statistical analyses author_uploaded_primary_full_text_HTML; publisher_abstract; Table3_text_with_some_garbled_dispersion
checked
Martens et al. (2018). Chronic nicotinamide riboside supplementation is well-tolerated and elevates NAD+ in healthy middle-aged and older adults
Main Results physical performance; Methods aerobic capacity, intervention, statistics; supplement actual Figure2A/B primary_full_text
checked
Martens2018 Supplementary information
PDF zero-based page1, actual Supplementary Figure2A/B, n21; mean +/- SD publisher_supplement_PDF_text_and_figure_screenshot
checked
Orr et al. (2024; online 2023). A randomized placebo-controlled trial of nicotinamide riboside in older adults with mild cognitive impairment
Current input previousTASK1020 S06; primary paper adverse-event reporting and prior3094 record provided_prior_original_source_extraction_reused_not_researched_again
checked
Heikkinen et al. (2026). The Divergent Effects of Nicotinamide Riboside and High-Intensity Exercise Training on Skeletal Muscle Epigenetic Aging
Methods2.1 cohorts; methylation analyses; separate exercise cohorts primary_full_text
checked
Effects of NR Supplementation on Metabolic Flexibility in Zone2Training
Official indexed trial title; current outcome/results fields unavailable official_indexed_title_and_registry_shell; API_fetch_failed
checked
Lin et al. (2025). Nicotinamide riboside combined with exercise to treat hypertension in middle-aged and older adults: a pilot randomized clinical trial
Abstract population,design,primaryoutcome primary_abstract_and_full_page_screened_for_boundary
checked
Lin et al. (2026). Safety and efficacy of a nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide precursor and exercise training in Friedreich ataxia
PubMed/publisher indexed title and DOI; full numeric report not accessible primary_indexed_title_identifier_only; PubMed_empty_body_and_publisher_fetch_failed
checked
Liao et al. (2021). Nicotinamide mononucleotide supplementation enhances aerobic capacity in amateur runners: a randomized, double-blind study
Title/Methods molecular intervention primary_full_text_identity_screen
checked
Jensen et al. (2022). A randomized placebo-controlled trial of nicotinamide riboside and pterostilbene supplementation in experimental muscle injury in elderly individuals
Current input previousTASK1020 S11; original intervention identity provided_prior_primary_intervention_extract_reused
checked
Elhassan et al. (2019). Nicotinamide Riboside Augments the Aged Human Skeletal Muscle NAD+ Metabolome and Induces Transcriptomic and Anti-inflammatory Signatures
inputs/prior/TASK-1020_sources.json S04 provided_prior_source_map_reused_without_new_clinical_review
checked
Bhandari et al. (2025; online 2024). Feasibility of telehealth exercise and nicotinamide riboside supplementation in survivors of childhood cancer at risk for diabetes: A pilot randomized controlled trial
inputs/prior/TASK-1020_sources.json S02 provided_prior_source_map_reused_without_new_clinical_review
checked
Shoji et al. (2025). Nicotinamide Riboside Supplementation Benefits in Patients With Werner Syndrome
inputs/prior/TASK-1020_sources.json S01 provided_prior_source_map_reused_without_new_clinical_review
checked
Song et al. (2022). Exercise training and NR supplementation to improve muscle mass and fitness in adolescent and young adult hematopoietic cell transplant survivors: a randomized controlled trial
inputs/prior/TASK-1020_sources.json S07 provided_prior_source_map_reused_without_new_clinical_review
checked
NADage trial / supplied 3093 source record
inputs/prior/TASK-1020_sources.json S08 provided_prior_source_map_reused_without_new_clinical_review
checked
Impacts of Nicotinamide Riboside on Functional Capacity and Muscle Physiology in Older Veterans
inputs/prior/TASK-1020_sources.json S09 provided_prior_source_map_reused_without_new_clinical_review
checked
Prokopidis et al. (2025). The Effect of Nicotinamide Mononucleotide and Riboside on Skeletal Muscle Mass and Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
inputs/prior/TASK-1020_sources.json S10 provided_prior_source_map_reused_without_new_clinical_review
checked
TASK-1021 only: bilingual text, numbers, supplied axes/anchor, classification and safety complete
Technical integration by: Codex · Evidence date: 2026-09-17 · Corrections: none

Cite this verdict

Oral single-ingredient NR and endurance performance: benefit in trained adults is not established Evidence Grade D card
[Chamgap] Oral single-ingredient NR and endurance performance: benefit in trained adults is not established — Evidence Grade D·28. 19 cited sources checked. Source: https://chamgap.com/en/verdicts/sports/oral-nicotinamide-riboside-trained-adults-endurance-performance/ · CC BY 4.0

CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution; do not distort grades, numbers, or verdict meaning.

!

What this document does and does not do

Chamgap is an information source. It reports what research has and has not confirmed; it does not tell readers what to take or buy. That decision belongs to readers and, when needed, medical or legal professionals. This verdict reflects literature available up to the search date and may change as new research appears. Nothing here is medical advice.