CHAMGAP
APPROVEDReviewed and approved by the Chamgap Editorial Team (2026-07-17). The draft was written by AI, the existence of all 3 cited sources was verified at the original page, and the verdict passed blind grading and adversarial audit. Methodology v0.6.
Verdict No. 435 · Search date 2026-07-17 · Methodology v0.6

Freeze-dried Korean black raspberry powder,
does it really help with Antioxidant activity and reduction of oxidative stress?

30-Second Summary
C
Evidence Grade C · 46 · Safety unknown
The evidence is limited to selected oxidative markers for a specific freeze-dried powder, not clinical anti-aging efficacy
What the
research shows
Small human trials of 30 g/day freeze-dried powder for four weeks reported improvements in selected measures such as GPx, CAT, or lipid peroxidation, but findings were inconsistent and entirely biochemical surrogates. Evidence concentrated on a specific powder and its regulatory recognition cannot establish clinical anti-aging efficacy, so the grade is C.
What the
ads claim
Claims such as 'removes free radicals,' 'prevents cellular aging,' or 'anticancer antioxidant' expand laboratory-marker changes into longevity or disease prevention. Blood-pressure research on Rubus occidentalis and lipid research on unripe-fruit extract are different species, products, or efficacy axes.
*

Useful facts when choosing a product

  • The individually recognized ingredient in South Korea is a specified freeze-dried powder made from ripe Rubus coreanus fruit and is registered for antioxidant function.
  • The key human-trial dose was 30 g/day, which differs in concentration and composition from ordinary juice, concentrate, or extract capsules.
  • Rubus occidentalis is a different species, and sugar and polyphenol content can vary among products.
Gap Measurement · Verdict 435 · C 46
What advertising claims
What independent, higher-quality research supports
△ GAP
01

What the research actually shows

The uncontrolled Lee 2011 study in 15 men found higher GPx after 30 g/day for four weeks but no change in lipid peroxidation. The placebo-controlled Park 2015 trial, completed by 39 men, reported improvements in GPx, CAT, and plasma lipid peroxidation but no effect on plasma lipids, LDL oxidation, or DNA damage. In the Suh 2013 smoker trial, the between-group difference in urinary 8-OHdG was not significant and interpretation relied on an exploratory responder analysis.

02

Why this is classified as C (46)

Controlled human evidence exists, but small samples, four-week surrogate endpoints, conflicting results, and concentration on a specific ingredient result in C with 52 points.

Counterpoint. Some oxidative markers may improve with the standardized 30 g/day powder, but clinical health benefit remains unverified.

Rejudgment record. New verdict — Human trials exist, but four-week oxidative surrogates, conflicting results, and concentration on one individually recognized ingredient limit the grade to C

Sub-claim grades by effect

This ingredient is marketed for several effects. A single overall grade blends strong and weak claims together, so each effect is graded separately here. The overall grade reflects the strongest disconfirming or core claim.

Effect (sub-claim)GradeBasis
Antioxidant activityCSome antioxidant-enzyme surrogates such as GPx and CAT improved, but findings were inconsistent.
Reduction of oxidative stressCLipid peroxidation, 8-OHdG, and LDL-oxidation findings conflicted, with no clinical outcomes.

Cross-check — Codex and Claude

This verdict was drafted by Codex through literature review and source-existence checks, cross-checked through blind grading and adversarial audit, and settled by reapplying the methodology boundary rules. Cases with split grades were resolved through rejudgment.
03

Evidence Table

StudyDesignSampleFundingEndpointResultWeight
Lee JE et al. 2011Uncontrolled before-and-after human study15Rural Development AdministrationGPx, SOD, total antioxidant capacity, and lipid peroxidationGPx increased after 30 g/day for four weeks; lipid peroxidation and major metabolic markers did not change.Supportive
Park E et al. 2015Randomized, placebo-controlled human trial39Supported by the Rural Development AdministrationGPx, CAT, lipid peroxidation, LDL oxidation, and DNA damageSome enzymes and plasma lipid peroxidation improved; LDL oxidation and DNA damage were null.Key
Suh HW et al. 2013Randomized, placebo-controlled human trial38Government and agricultural research supportUrinary 8-OHdG and metabolitesThe between-group difference in 8-OHdG reduction was not significant; responder analysis was exploratory.Key
§

Receipt — 3 References

All 3 cited sources were verified for existence at the original page (as of 2026-07-17).

Lee JE, Park E, Lee JE, et al. Effects of a Rubus coreanus Miquel supplement on plasma antioxidant capacity in healthy Korean men. Nutr Res Pract. 2011;5(5):429-434. PMID: 22125680. DOI: 10.4162/nrp.2011.5.5.429.
checked
Park E, Lee NH, Baik JS, Jee Y. Effects of Korean black raspberry supplementation on oxidative stress and plasma antioxidant capacity in healthy male smokers. J Funct Foods. 2015;16:393-402. DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2015.04.047.
checked
Suh HW, Kim SH, Park S, et al. Effect of Korean black raspberry (Rubus coreanus Miquel) fruit administration on DNA damage levels in smokers and screening biomarker investigation using 1H-NMR-based metabolic profiling. Food Res Int. 2013;54(1):1255-1262. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2012.11.009.
checked
Draft and rewrite: Codex (AI) · Verification: Codex blind grading and adversarial audit · Final adjudication: Claude
Reviewed and approved: Chamgap Editorial Team · Approval date: 2026-07-17 · Corrections: none

Cite this verdict

Freeze-dried Korean black raspberry powder x antioxidant activity and reduction of oxidative stress Evidence Grade C card
[Chamgap] Freeze-dried Korean black raspberry powder x antioxidant activity and reduction of oxidative stress — Evidence Grade C·46. 3 cited sources checked. Source: https://chamgap.com/en/verdicts/antioxidant-aging/rubus-coreanus-freeze-dried-antioxidant/ · CC BY 4.0

CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution; do not distort grades, numbers, or verdict meaning.

!

What this document does and does not do

Chamgap is an information source. It reports what research has and has not confirmed; it does not tell readers what to take or buy. That decision belongs to readers and, when needed, medical or legal professionals. This verdict reflects literature available up to the search date and may change as new research appears. Nothing here is medical advice.