| 1 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N01 · Evidence conditionWhat is the selected original claim?Required |
The selected claim is complete healing and reduced healing time in pressure ulcers, for single-ingredient oral vitamin C added to standard wound care. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Single-ingredient oral C, adults with pressure ulcers, complete healing/healing time and comparison |
Material needed: Original population, intervention, comparator, endpoint and timing material This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 2 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N02 · Evidence conditionAre current reading and past abstract checking distinguished?Required |
The complete stored summary, 2 evidence entries, 2 citations and Korean/English content were used. Past abstract checking and unverified registration/protocol wording remain historical records. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Stored summaries, historical abstract-checking records and current external reading/acquisition |
Material needed: Original material and actual access, acquisition and reading history This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 3 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N03 · Evidence conditionWhat identifies the early report?Required |
The early report of 20 people by Taylor TV et al., Lancet1974, PMID4140267 and DOI10.1016/S0140-6736(74)91874-1 is preserved. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Taylor1974 title, PMID/DOI and report relationships |
Material needed: Original paper, complete citation and related-report list This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 4 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N04 · Evidence conditionWhat identifies the main report?Required |
The main report of 88 people by ter Riet G, Kessels AG and Knipschild PG, J Clin Epidemiol1995, PMID8543959 and DOI10.1016/0895-4356(95)00053-4 is preserved. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
ter Riet1995 title, PMID/DOI and trial relationships |
Material needed: Original paper, trial/related reports and plan list This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 5 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N05 · Evidence conditionAre studies, reports, people and ulcers kept separate?Required |
The early 20 and main 88 people remain linked to each report, with periods, populations, comparisons and endpoints distinguished. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Relationships among early/main studies, reports, participants, lesions and endpoint denominators |
Material needed: Study-specific flow, lesion/person correspondence and related reports This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 6 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N06 · Evidence conditionWhich adults with pressure ulcers are represented?Required |
The main trial records 88 people across 11 nursing homes+1 hospital; the early study records 20 surgical patients. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Institutional/hospital care, surgical patients, ulcer stage/site, baseline and selection |
Material needed: Population selection and baseline/ulcer characteristic tables This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 7 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N07 · Evidence conditionAre deficiency correction and additional supplementation distinguished?Required |
The original account says effects cannot be separated by deficiency or nutritional status, limiting positive and negative generalizations. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Baseline vitamin C, nutrition, deficiency prevalence and prespecified subgroups |
Material needed: Baseline C/nutrition measurements, deficiency-specific denominators and prespecified interactions This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 8 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N08 · Evidence conditionWhich vitamin C formulation is represented?Required |
This is a single-ingredient oral ascorbic acid supplement. No plant part is newly assigned to the purified nutrient. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Single-ingredient ascorbic acid, oral route, tablets/capsules, salts/excipients |
Material needed: Trial formulation, feedstock, salt, excipient and manufacturing specifications This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 9 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N09 · Evidence conditionAre main and early doses distinguished?Required |
The main trial’s500 mg versus10 mg, each2 times daily, is preserved. The early dose was not rechecked in the original paper body, according to the citation record. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Main500 mg 2 times daily versus10 mg 2 times daily; exact early dose |
Material needed: Study-specific dose, administration and adherence specifications This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 10 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N10 · Evidence conditionDoes active low-dose control differ from the early placebo?Required |
The main comparator is active low-dose C rather than a vitamin-free placebo. The early placebo comparison remains separate. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Main low-dose C, early placebo and actual standard-care comparisons |
Material needed: Study-specific comparator, administration and ingredient specifications This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 11 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N11 · Evidence conditionWhat common wound care and nutrition were provided?Required |
The original account compares high/low-dose C added to standard wound care and says this is not a multinutrient ingredient-attribution trial. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Arm-specific dressings, pressure relief, standard care, nutrition and other treatment |
Material needed: Arm-specific care/nutrition, changes and rescue-treatment records This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 12 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N12 · Evidence conditionHow were the early and main studies allocated?Required |
The early study is double-blind controlled with randomization/analysis details unverified; the main trial is preserved as multicentre blinded randomized·ITT. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Early double-blind controlled design; main multicentre blinded randomized design; allocation/concealment |
Material needed: Original methods, allocation/concealment and baseline tables This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 13 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N13 · Evidence conditionHow were ulcer measurement and healing assessment masked?Required |
The masked-design wording and complete-healing/area results are preserved. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Assessors, complete-epithelialisation criteria, area methods and arm-specific measurement |
Material needed: Measurement/assessment rules, assessor procedures and measurement records This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 14 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N14 · Evidence conditionAre4 weeks,12 weeks and time to healing distinguished?Required |
Main12-week and early4-week periods are preserved separately, distinguishing treatment duration, time to healing and area-assessment timing. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Early4 weeks, main12 weeks and healing observation/censoring schedules |
Material needed: Dosing, observation, visit and censoring schedules This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 15 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N15 · Evidence conditionAre complete healing and area reduction the same endpoint?Required |
Complete epithelialisation/healing time (H) remains distinct from area reduction (S). The early report is positive for area; the main trial includes complete-healing survival analysis. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Hierarchy of complete epithelialisation/closure and healing time H versus area S |
Material needed: Endpoint definitions, prespecified hierarchy, complete-healing events and area tables This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 16 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N16 · Evidence conditionWhat are the early positive area results?Required |
Mean area reduction84% versus42.7%, P<.005 is retained as originally recorded. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
20 people,4 weeks, mean area reduction, dispersion/denominators/intervals |
Material needed: Early original result tables, dispersion, denominators and intervals This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 17 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N17 · Evidence conditionWhat do the main HR and90% interval represent?Required |
Complete-healing Cox HR0.78,90% precision interval0.44–1.39 is preserved. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Cox complete-healing HR, original90% precision interval and denominators |
Material needed: Original Cox methods/results, events/censoring and original intervals This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 18 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N18 · Evidence conditionWhat are the main area-healing and adjusted-difference interval results?Required |
Mean area healing0.21 versus0.27cm²/week and adjusted-difference PI−0.17~0.13 are preserved. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
0.21 versus0.27cm²/week, adjusted-difference PI and interval level |
Material needed: Original area model/results, adjustment terms and interval level This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 19 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N19 · Evidence conditionIs the HR kept distinct from other treatment-effect measures?Required |
The main result is a Cox HR from healing survival analysis, distinct from area in cm²/week. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Time-to-event effect, observation/censoring, proportional hazards and interpretation direction |
Material needed: Cox model, censoring, adjustment, assumptions and original results This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 20 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N20 · Evidence conditionWhat are the88-person, arm/endpoint and person/lesion denominators?Required |
The original main record of88 people across11 nursing homes+1 hospital is retained. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
88 people overall, institutions, allocation/measurement/analysis, complete-healing events and ulcer denominators |
Material needed: Participant flow and person/ulcer, endpoint-specific event/denominator tables This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 21 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N21 · Evidence conditionHow were attrition, ITT and facility structure handled?Required |
The main multicentre ITT design and unverified early randomization/analysis details are preserved. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
ITT/missingness, attrition, facility/lesion clustering and analysis units |
Material needed: Original analysis, missingness/attrition, facilities/analysis units and sensitivity This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 22 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N22 · Evidence conditionWere prespecified endpoints, registration and plans checked?Required |
Both reports record registration numbers as not found. Early complete-healing prespecification and main official registration/SAP remain unverified. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Registration, protocol, SAP and endpoints/timing/analysis/changes |
Material needed: Registration history, protocol, SAP and complete results This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 23 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N23 · Evidence conditionAre early positive and main negative results both preserved?Required |
Early positive area reduction and the original main account of no improvement in complete healing/area remain together. The original conflict interpretation is preserved as historical wording. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Differences in population, duration, comparison, area/complete healing and positive/null findings |
Material needed: Study-specific results, formulation/population/nutrition, denominators and plans This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 24 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N24 · Evidence conditionWhat is the precision of the main null and important difference?Required |
The original account says exaggerating a90% interval as95% misrepresents precision and limits generalization by deficiency status. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Plausible effect range,90% interval and justified important difference |
Material needed: Original intervals, sample-size plan, important difference and nutrition-specific results This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 25 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N25 · Evidence conditionWhat are independence, original funding and product support?Required |
Early funding is unverified; main funding, manufacturer and employee authors are unverified. The original independent-trial/I2 descriptions remain historical values. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Original funding, manufacturer, product provision, employee authors and COI records |
Material needed: Funding, product, employment and COI specifications for each report This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 26 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N26 · Evidence conditionWhat unique replication addresses the same oral question?Required |
The two stored reports distinguish early4-week area/placebo and main12-week complete-healing/area/active-low-dose comparisons. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Family relationships for the same formulation, population, comparison and complete healing/time |
Material needed: Related reports and direct trials addressing the same question This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 27 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N27 · Evidence conditionIs the topical-registration summary kept separate from an oral trial?Required |
The stored summary describes a2026 new registration as topical paste with no results yet. It is not counted as a new positive oral trial. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Topical registration/results, route/formulation and oral directness |
Material needed: Original topical registration/results and exact formulation/route This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 28 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N28 · Evidence conditionIs the question kept separate from combinations, diabetic foot and intravenous use?Required |
The account does not substitute multinutrient or diabetic foot ulcer results and does not automatically include foods, combination products or intravenous use. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Single-ingredient oral pressure-ulcer question versus other ingredient/route/wound questions |
Material needed: Separate direct material for each combination, route and wound This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 29 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N29 · Evidence conditionWhat are long-term, dose-specific and nutrition-specific effects?Required |
The main12-week and early4-week scope and inability to separate deficiency strata are retained. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Direct dose, deficiency/nutrition, long-term/recurrence and prespecified subgroups |
Material needed: Direct dose, long-term and baseline nutrition/subgroup material This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 30 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N30 · Evidence conditionAre collagen mechanisms distinguished from clinical healing?Required |
The account says a need for collagen synthesis does not establish accelerated clinical healing with additional high dosing. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Mechanism, area, complete healing and separate quality-of-life/infection outcomes |
Material needed: Direct material for selected endpoints and separate clinical outcomes This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 31 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N31 · Evidence conditionHow were harms of high-dose oral C collected?Supplementary |
The original safety state is Caution. Original wording on possible diarrhea/gastrointestinal discomfort and limited study-specific event counts is preserved. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Event definitions/collection, arm/exposure denominators and discontinuation |
Material needed: Adverse-event, collection and discontinuation tables for each study This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 32 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N32 · Evidence conditionWhat are the harm comparisons, timing and baseline predispositions?Supplementary |
Original caution about gastrointestinal discomfort with high oral doses, stone predisposition, kidney disease and iron overload is preserved. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
High/low dose/placebo, cointerventions, kidney/stone/iron risks, timeline and alternatives |
Material needed: Arm-specific exposure/events, timelines and baseline/cointervention material This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 33 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N33 · Evidence conditionWhat are long-term/rare harms and special populations?Supplementary |
The short pressure-ulcer studies and original safety-caution scope are retained. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Long-term/rare events, population-specific direct exposure and interactions |
Material needed: Long-term and baseline-disease-specific exposure/harm material This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 34 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N34 · Evidence conditionHow are original D34, assessment values, evidence date and change records preserved?Required |
D34, original assessment values, past independent cross-checking wording, original verdict date2026-09-07 and Korean/English content are preserved. Original correction, subclaim and deliberation records are empty. The current production date is not converted into a completed review date. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Original grade/score, assessment values, Korean/English, evidence date, change history and past validation |
Material needed: Original verdict/change history, additional material and user comments This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |