| 1 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N01 · Evidence conditionWhich existing questionnaire symptom-day claim is being transferred?Required |
The selected claim is fewer questionnaire-recorded cold-like symptom-days, with original subclaim grade C and a note that several symptom-day proportions were lower but 95% CIs were not reported. Absent subclaim score/status/axes are distinguished from parent C50. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Selected wording, subclaim grade and parent results |
Materials needed: Questionnaire symptom definitions, denominators, comparison/time points, estimand and user boundary review. The parent score is not used to fill subclaim values. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 2 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N02 · Evidence conditionWhat cold risk and health status characterize the population?Required |
The original trial involved 200 healthy Japanese people aged 20–64 prone to colds. Applicability is not expanded to children, older people, immunocompromised people/patients or every region/season. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Healthy Japanese adults aged 20–64 prone to colds |
Materials needed: Original materials on cold susceptibility/eligibility, baseline health, comorbidities/medication and vaccination/contact exposure, plus direct results in other populations. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 3 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N03 · Evidence conditionWhat is the study identity of the trial drink?Required |
The original English text describes a drink containing Lactobacillus paragasseri SBT2055 (LG2055), the company-developed LG2055 drinkable yogurt. Organism count/CFU, drink volume, detailed composition and adherence are not established within the preserved scope. Equivalent effects of other strains/fermented milks are not assumed. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
LG2055 drinkable yogurt versus other probiotics/products |
Materials needed: Original strain, formulation/quantities, active product/manufacturing and actual exposure/adherence materials. No product/drink consumption or cold/infection-prevention instructions. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 4 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N04 · Evidence conditionWhat does the actual identical-yogurt control compare?Required |
The original materials explain that LG2055 yogurt was compared with identical yogurt lacking only LG2055 to ask about the added strain’s symptom-day effect. This is not changed into a comparison with no yogurt/intervention or an effect of yogurt in general. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Identical yogurt lacking only LG2055 |
Materials needed: Group composition, sensory properties/masking, actual product/exposure, concurrent diet/treatment and contact materials. Equality of all conditions is not certified through a new external comparison. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 5 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N05 · Evidence conditionAre winter 12-week results separated from other durations?Required |
The original trial observed participants for 12 weeks during winter. Actual intake/adherence, date/season distribution, missing symptom records and post-intervention follow-up remain unverified in detail. 12 weeks are not converted into a new total of days/person-days. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Observation duration, season and actual exposure |
Materials needed: Original actual-exposure/recording duration, missingness/discontinuation, season/infection exposure and time-specific results. No long-term prevention/persistence effects or implementation instructions. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 6 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N06 · Evidence conditionAre allocation, consumption completion and primary efficacy analyses separate?Required |
The original materials report 200 randomized participants, 100/100 allocated, 198 completing consumption and, after five exclusions, a primary efficacy PPS of 193 (97/96). These original numbers describe separate stages; no new attrition counts/rates or group-specific exclusion counts are calculated. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
200/198/193 participants and group-specific PPS |
Materials needed: Flow diagrams, group-specific completion/exclusion reasons, endpoint-specific observations/analyses and missing-data handling. 200 randomized participants are not automatically repurposed as efficacy, harm or symptom-day denominators. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 7 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N07 · Evidence conditionAre PPS results presented as ITT effects for everyone?Required |
Primary efficacy used the PPS of 193 rather than all 200 participants. The original verdict records this limit; identical effects or sensitivity results for the full randomized ITT population are not established within the preserved scope. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Protocol-compliant completer analysis versus all randomized participants |
Materials needed: Original ITT/other analysis populations, exclusions/missing data and results, and prespecified analysis plans. Positive PPS results are not certified as effects in all randomized participants. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 8 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N08 · Evidence conditionHow are questionnaire symptom-days defined?Required |
The original primary endpoint was days with questionnaire-recorded cold-like symptoms over 12 weeks. Detailed symptom items/frequency, recording methods, adjudication/severity criteria, concurrent treatment and missing-record rules remain unverified. This is preserved as a direct outcome distinct from confirmed infection. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Self-reported days with symptoms and measurement methods |
Materials needed: Questionnaire tools, symptom-day criteria/concurrent symptoms, recording/missingness, measurement timing, advance plans and original tables. Symptom names are not newly designated as confirmed diagnoses. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 9 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N09 · Evidence conditionWhat are the runny-nose numerator, denominator and effect?Required |
Original runny-nose days were 2384/8148 days (29.3%) versus 2769/8066 days (34.3%), with original absolute difference −5.0 percentage points and P<.001. Only the original symptom-day values are preserved; they are not converted into individual infection risk, new RR/CI or an absolute reduction in days. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Original symptom-day proportions, absolute difference and P value |
Materials needed: Original runny-nose symptom-day tables, group-specific denominator definitions, estimand, analysis model and 95% CI materials. No new recalculation or invented quantitative example. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 10 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N10 · Evidence conditionAre people, person-days, repeated symptoms and events distinct?Required |
2384/8148 and 2769/8066 are day numerators/denominators in the original wording, distinct from the person denominators of 193 (97/96). Overlapping symptoms within the same day/person remain unverified in detail. Symptom-specific days are not summed as unique people or infection events. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Symptom-day denominators versus 193-person denominators |
Materials needed: Original recording/denominator units, participant-specific durations, concurrent/repeated symptoms, event definitions and missingness. No new person-day details/totals are calculated. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 11 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N11 · Evidence conditionHas the correlation structure of repeated records and analyses been verified?Required |
The original materials provide symptom-day proportions and P values, but detailed handling of repeated/concurrent symptoms within participants, clustering/time series, missingness and models remains unverified. It is not asserted that repeated days were treated as independent participants, and no new error is judged. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Models/missing data for repeated symptom-days within people |
Materials needed: Original estimand, within-participant repetition/correlation, missing observations, aggregation/testing methods and sensitivity analyses. No current model reanalysis or clinical calculation. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 12 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N12 · Evidence conditionAre other questionnaire symptom results recorded separately?Required |
The original narrative reports nasal congestion 17.7% versus 27.7%, sneezing 17.7% versus 20.2%, sore throat 6.3% versus 12.2% and hoarseness 3.5% versus 8.2%. Each original proportion is preserved; runny-nose P/CI limitations or denominators are not automatically copied to all symptoms, and no new difference/RR is calculated. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Nasal congestion, sneezing, sore throat and hoarseness |
Materials needed: Original symptom-specific actual numerators/denominators, effects/CIs, models/time points and advance hierarchy. Symptoms are not added as a new composite score or infection event. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 13 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N13 · Evidence conditionAre missing cough values being filled from its P value?Supplementary |
The original counterview records that cough also had P<.001. Exact cough proportions, numerators/denominators and effects/CIs are not provided in the summary. Runny-nose 29.3/34.3% and −5.0 percentage points are not copied to cough. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Separate cough results and detailed gaps |
Materials needed: Original cough tables, denominators, effects/CIs, tests/models and advance hierarchy. No new symptom values or CI estimates. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 14 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N14 · Evidence conditionAre multiplicity and a composite score across symptoms verified?Required |
The original materials record that the symptoms were not tested as one prespecified hierarchical composite score. Total test numbers, multiplicity adjustment/success criteria and advance plans remain unverified in detail. Original P values are not changed into adjusted P values or upgraded into whole-product cold prevention. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Prespecified hierarchical composite scores versus symptom-specific tests |
Materials needed: Complete endpoint/test lists, registration/protocol/SAP, prespecification/multiple comparisons, selective reporting and original results. No new adjusted P value or grade. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 15 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N15 · Evidence conditionIs the primary symptom-day specification distinct from the runny-nose example?Required |
The original evidence narrative describes a primary questionnaire symptom-day endpoint, and the reader answer supplies a quantitative runny-nose example. Runny nose is not newly designated as the sole prespecified primary endpoint or as the same effect for all symptoms. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Primary questionnaire symptom-days versus selecting a specific symptom |
Materials needed: Prespecified endpoints/priorities, symptom-specific analyses, complete results and plan/change materials. A selected symptom is not upgraded into a broad conclusion. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 16 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N16 · Evidence conditionWas laboratory-confirmed infection incidence directly measured?Required |
The original crux/English text distinguishes this from a trial measuring infection incidence or laboratory-confirmed colds. The infection subclaim’s note also records that laboratory-confirmed incidence was not measured. Symptom-day reductions are not converted into infection prevention or fewer infected people/events. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Questionnaire symptoms versus pathogen-confirmed infection |
Materials needed: Test/clinical-confirmation definitions, pathogens, direct group-specific infection events/denominators, follow-up and effects/CIs. Non-measurement is not changed into zero events or zero effect. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 17 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N17 · Evidence conditionAre severity, health-care use and other clinical outcomes being filled?Required |
The preserved scope covers questionnaire-recorded symptom-days and symptom-specific proportions. Separate direct results for clinical severity, health-care use, hospitalization or absence from work are not provided in the current summary. Unread originals are not assumed to mean actual non-measurement. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Symptom-days versus severity, clinical visits/hospitalization and absence from work |
Materials needed: Definitions, actual measurement/denominators, comparisons/durations, effects/CIs and originals for each clinical outcome. Symptom-days are not converted into clinical events or treatment effects. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 18 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N18 · Evidence conditionWhat gaps remain in 95% CIs and clinical effect size?Required |
The original runny-nose absolute difference of −5.0 percentage points, P<.001 and several symptom-day proportions are preserved. The original report narrative says between-group 95% CIs were not presented. Clinical thresholds, person-specific effects and CIs are not newly derived from P values/denominators. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Original absolute difference/P value and unreported 95% CIs |
Materials needed: Original effect estimates/precision, 95% CIs, prespecified clinical thresholds and denominator/correlation/model materials. Positive results are not expanded into long-term or infection effects. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 19 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N19 · Evidence conditionAre symptom-days presented as a general immunity effect?Required |
The original advertising interpretation explains an added-strain symptom-day effect versus identical yogurt, without establishing infection prevention or a general immune boost. New efficacy is not extended to mechanisms, other products/strains, populations or seasons. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
The product’s added strain versus broad immunity claims |
Materials needed: Direct endpoints, populations/interventions/comparators, durations, denominators and effects/CIs for each broad claim. No current mechanism, infection-prevention, cold-management or treatment-replacement instructions. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 20 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N20 · Harm-information gaps supplementing the efficacy tableAre 12-week related safety signals distinct from all harms?Supplementary |
The original materials contain the limited statement that no serious study-food-related safety signal was reported over 12 weeks, plus dairy-allergy/lactose-discomfort cautions. This is not extended into zero adverse events, safety in all populations or exclusion of long-term harms. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Serious study-food-related signals and dairy/lactose contexts |
Materials needed: Group-specific AE/SAE collection, actual exposure/denominators, discontinuation/relatedness, allergy/lactose and long-term materials. No new harm rates or product-consumption/cold-management instructions. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 21 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N21 · Evidence conditionWhat materials were actually read in this work?Required |
The complete parent JSON was read for production and preserved in its original form. Summary reading concerns the preserved summary; external abstracts, full texts, registration and protocol/SAP remain unread in this work. URL/bibliography presence is not upgraded into external reading. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Preserved JSON summary and external-reading status |
Materials needed: Materials for users to record actual external acquisition/reading scope, versions and timing. No current link/click/access tests. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 22 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N22 · Evidence conditionAre registration, public dates, plans and current reading distinct?Required |
The original evidence lists UMIN000045901. Although the paper stated registration preceded initiation, the preserved Korean/English narrative distinguishes public posting on 2022-09-08 after the planned 2021-10-30 start as retrospectively public registration. No current external comparison of actual start/version or plan agreement was performed, and no official URL is guessed. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Original registration information and detailed plans/access |
Materials needed: Original registration texts/versions, public/start/change dates, endpoint/analysis and report-linkage materials. Only historical narratives are preserved; no current prespecification/access certification. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 23 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N23 · Evidence conditionWere protocol/SAP and endpoint/multiplicity plans acquired?Required |
The original registration identifier, historical cross-checking and primary/secondary narratives are preserved. Individual protocol/SAP originals, versions/dates, complete endpoints/analyses/multiplicity and plan changes were not read in this work. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Advance plan, change and analysis materials |
Materials needed: Protocol, SAP, revision history, complete endpoints/estimands/missingness, multiple comparisons, public dates and paper-comparison materials. Unread external materials are not assumed to mean absent documents. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 24 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N24 · Evidence conditionAre company funding, product support, employee authors and research roles separate?Required |
The original materials record four MEGMILK SNOW BRAND employee authors EK/TA/MK/TK, a company-developed LG2055 product and NS’s employment at the contract research organization KSO Corporation. The original limit that separate public cofunding, medical-writing and publication support were not identified is retained. Company cash funding, product manufacturing/provision and detailed design/analysis/data control remain separately unverified. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Four categories of company involvement and other support |
Materials needed: Separate originals for company cash funding, product/food manufacturing support, author employment/contractor relationships, design/analysis/data control and other support/COI. The original independence axis is not used as new certification. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 25 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N25 · Evidence conditionAre narrow positive results, broad-claim gaps and unverified materials distinct?Required |
Positive questionnaire symptom-day results are distinguished from unmeasured laboratory-confirmed infections, originally unreported 95% CIs and unread detailed external materials. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Direct endpoints and access/reporting limitations |
Materials needed: Materials verifying question-specific actual measurements/definitions, original tables/denominators, plans and actual access scope. Unread is not substituted for unreported, zero studies or zero effect. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 26 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N26 · Evidence conditionAre reports, trials, people, repeated measures and sibling sheets distinct?Required |
Parent 2977 and existing s0/s1 share the same Kobatake2022 report and 12-week trial context of 200 randomized participants/193 PPS participants. The same people, groups, days, symptoms, time points, bibliography and sibling sheets are not added as new independent trials/participants. One current report link is not a certified count of unique trials/participants. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Document linkage versus unique trials/participants |
Materials needed: Original registration/report, actual cohort/analysis, endpoint/time-point and repeated-measure relationships. Unique trial counts and unique participant totals remain unrecorded. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 27 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N27 · Evidence conditionIs there evidence of separate independent confirmation?Supplementary |
Parent replication R1 and independence I0 are preserved. The same report, subgroup, scale, repeated days or sibling sheets are not certified as new independent efficacy/harm replications. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Original R1/I0 versus independent replication |
Materials needed: Confirmatory materials showing selected-question advance plans, separate populations/comparators, direct endpoints/denominators, effects/CIs, duration/funding and author relationships. No current search or independence judgment. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 28 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N28 · Evidence conditionAre selected-subclaim and parent scores/axes preserved?Required |
Selected grade/note and Korean/English claim wording are preserved, with absent subclaim score/status/axes left unrecorded. Parent C50, good safety and B/P/R1/I0/E+, bias axis and unrecorded precision are parent context, not a score for the selected row. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Subclaim grade/note, absent fields and parent context |
Materials needed: User subclaim/parent-boundary review and actual correction materials. No new score/grade or official RoB 2/GRADE certification. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production. |
| 29 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N29 · Evidence conditionAre Korean/English wording and absent structured fields preserved?Required |
Parent Korean/English text, evidence/citation lists, axes and original selected-subclaim wording are preserved in the complete summary. Korean/English classification fields are absent; no new fields are filled in the original materials. External English papers were not compared. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Wording in both languages and absent classification fields |
Materials needed: Materials for content review of bilingual terms, endpoints/durations, absent fields and selected scope. Production explanations remain distinct from original wording. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 30 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N30 · Evidence conditionAre reference dates, corrections, historical cross-checking and production dates distinct?Required |
Original reference date 2026-08-26, empty corrections/deliberation and grade-decision cross-check narratives are preserved. This history is not current condition freezing/application, production date or completed content review. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Original 2026-08-26 versus production/application events |
Materials needed: When new materials/corrections arise, materials for separate updates to originals, events, conditions/observations and verdict decisions. Historical narratives are not used as new clinical review. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 31 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N31 · Evidence conditionWhat direct materials could fill the selected gaps?Supplementary |
Original materials are needed to improve precision of symptom-day effects/CIs, repeated-record denominators, PPS/ITT and advance hierarchy. Infection prevention is a separate question requiring direct confirmed-infection data. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Definitions, direct endpoints, denominators/effects/CIs and plans |
Materials needed: Question-matched advance direct comparisons, overall/symptom-specific denominators, estimands/CIs, measurement/missingness, multiplicity and separate confirmation/long-term harms. Only need is recorded; no current lookup or clinical study. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |
| 32 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N32 · Evidence conditionAre production, user review and implementation instructions distinct?Supplementary |
This is table-content production from the preserved summary. Existing content and question-boundary review remain incomplete, and candidate pending/eligibility flags are preserved as history. Existing review status is recorded as it stands. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Production request, candidate history and content-review responsibility |
Materials needed: Existing content review and later actual-material/correction work. The historical production record did not perform clinical-original comparison, external access, new calculations, grade changes or product/drink-consumption, sleep/cold-management, infection-prevention or treatment-replacement instructions. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no current lookup or research execution. |