Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation: distinguishing specific vocational advice and delivery systems — an evidence checklist

Required evidence, verification status and materials actually read
Item	AVerification status	BReading scope	CReview item	DCurrent findings	EWhy unverified	FRequired materials and conditions	GFurther research
1	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N01 · Comparative efficacyAre the general vocational-rehabilitation verdict and the specific SWAP parent verdict distinguished?Required	The subclaim is ‘Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation’, with original grade D and a note about MI-NAV results at different time points and the lack of independent confirmation. The parent concerns the specific SWAP comparison: B, 72 points, safety Unknown. R01 R03 R04	Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Subclaim score, status and axes are absent; do not fill them with parent values. No new verdict that all vocational rehabilitation is ineffective is made.	Separate records of the subclaim, grade and note and the parent verdict	If additional material is provided, link direct evidence for each population, program and outcome.
2	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N02 · Comparative efficacyAre SWAP workers with musculoskeletal pain and other vocational-rehabilitation populations the same?Required	SWAP included 338 workers with musculoskeletal pain in UK primary care. R01	Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Detailed eligibility by occupation, condition and baseline absence and direct effects in other populations have not been read. Do not automatically apply this to other rehabilitation populations.	Original materials on occupation, baseline work status, condition, eligibility and denominators	Obtain original eligibility, baseline characteristics, work and absence status and direct comparisons for each population.
3	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N03 · Comparative efficacyWhat program was early stepped physiotherapist vocational advice and case management?Required	The original intervention was vocational advice and case management by primary-care physiotherapists, an early stepped service in UK primary care. R01	Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not equate it with all vocational rehabilitation, employment support or other programs, or create treatment or support instructions for users. Components, frequency and adherence have not been read.	Study records of providers, services, support, accompanying management and actual exposure	Obtain original service components, providers, start time, actual exposure and accompanying management materials.
4	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N04 · Comparative efficacyWhat were SWAP control management and the comparator for the generalization question?Required	SWAP was a cluster-randomized trial comparing 158 intervention and 180 control participants. R01	Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Specific control management, contact and service exposure are not established by this summary. Do not recast it as the effects of all services versus no support.	Original group records of usual management, contact, additional support and existing treatment	Obtain original control and accompanying management, contact differences and direct comparisons for the generalization question.
5	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N05 · Comparative efficacyAre cluster allocation across 6 practices and the denominator of 338 participants distinguished?Required	SWAP randomized 6 general practices as clusters and compared 338 participants, 158/180. R01	Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not treat 338 people as independent allocation units or create cluster allocations, ICC or design effects absent from the original paper.	Original materials on clusters, individuals, allocation and analysis denominators, cluster sizes and adjustment	Obtain original cluster allocation, sizes, analysis adjustment and participant flow materials.
6	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N06 · Comparative efficacyAre four-month self-reported absence days the same outcome for all vocational rehabilitation?Required	The direct endpoint was patient-questionnaire-reported absence days over 4 months. R01	Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not equate it with return to work, work participation, job retention, income or all work function. Detailed outcome definitions and questionnaire procedures have not been read.	Absence definitions, recall period, questionnaire, denominators and analysis units	Obtain original absence definitions, time points, questionnaire and denominators separately from direct material for other outcomes.
7	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N07 · Comparative efficacyAre mean absence days, mean difference and IRR different effect measures?Required	The original account gives 4-month means of 9.3 versus 14.4 days, mean difference −5.1 days, IRR 0.51 (95% CI 0.26–0.99), P=0.048. R01	Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not change IRR into a recurrence risk ratio or return-to-work proportion. No new differences, rates, denominators or CI are calculated. The mean-difference CI and analysis model have not been read.	Original group means, between-group mean difference, incidence rate ratio, CI and tests	Obtain the original absence-analysis model, cluster adjustment and separate estimation tables for mean difference and IRR.
8	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N08 · Comparative efficacyAre borderline statistical results distinguished from certification of universal benefit?Required	The original account notes only 6 practices and borderline CI and P results. R01	Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not extend significance into certification of benefit for every population, delivery system and duration. Do not replace the parent's unrecorded precision with a new value.	Original effects, precision, prespecified plans and scope of application	Link populations, periods, effects, CI and scope of application for new direct comparisons separately.
9	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N09 · Comparative efficacyDo gaps remain in four-month response, attrition and analysis populations?Required	The original abstract did not provide 4-month questionnaire response, so the preserved account says attrition cannot be estimated. R01	Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not certify the randomized denominator of 338 as the questionnaire-analysis denominator or calculate attrition.	Original group questionnaire returns, missingness, analysis populations and sensitivity analyses	Obtain original questionnaire returns, group reasons for missingness, analysis populations and sensitivity-analysis materials.
10	Unverified	Full text not readStored summary read	N10 · Comparative efficacyAre allocation concealment, blinding and self-report measurement procedures directly described?Required	The information that SWAP was cluster randomized and used patient-questionnaire outcomes is preserved. R01	Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Detailed concealment and participant, assessor and analyst blinding are unverified in this summary. Do not use the B0 axis as certification of a current review.	Cluster allocation, concealment, measurement and analysis procedures and original methods	Obtain original trial methods and measurement and analysis procedures.
11	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N11 · Comparative efficacyWhat were the prespecified primary endpoint, registration and success threshold?Required	4-month absence days were the prespecified primary endpoint, with follow-up to 12 months. A two-sided 5% level and 80% power were declared, but an important absence-day difference was not set as a success threshold. R01 R02	Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not recast test level and power as a clinical success threshold. Registration, protocol and SAP have not been read in this work.	Original registration, protocol, SAP, primary hierarchy and clinical-importance materials	Link original registration, SAP, changes and importance plans separately.
12	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N12 · Comparative efficacyAre net societal benefit, absence costs and healthcare costs distinguished from generalized cost-effectiveness?Required	The original account gives net societal benefit of £733 per person and preserves the original explanation of £748 lower absence costs and £15 higher healthcare costs. R01	Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not add new calculations or exchange rates or transfer these to cost-effectiveness in other countries or benefits of every rehabilitation program. Cost CI and detailed perspective have not been read.	Original setting, currency, perspective, period, costs and uncertainty materials	Obtain the original economic analysis period, perspective, cost components and uncertainty and materials from other systems.
13	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N13 · Comparative efficacyCan pain, quality of life and other secondary outcomes replace absence effects?Required	The original account explicitly says pain and quality-of-life secondary outcomes should not be used to stand in for absence benefits. R01	Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not create secondary-outcome figures or superiority absent from this summary. Do not fill in universal vocational-rehabilitation function.	Outcome-specific definitions, hierarchy, denominators, effects and intervals	Obtain secondary-outcome tables and prespecified hierarchy and multiplicity plans for each endpoint.
14	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N14 · Comparative efficacyAre SWAP's 12-month follow-up and MI-NAV's 12-month results the same?Required	SWAP is recorded as followed to 12 months, while its direct figures concern 4 months. MI-NAV has separate 12-month results. R01 R04	Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not fill SWAP's sustained effects with MI-NAV's 12-month effects. SWAP follow-up figures are absent from this summary.	Trial-specific follow-up periods, time points, effects and denominators	Link original SWAP results at each time point and MI-NAV materials by trial.
15	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N15 · Comparative efficacyWhat were MI-NAV populations, NAV delivery and the three intervention comparisons?Required	MI-NAV compared motivational interviewing or stratified vocational advice delivered through NAV with usual case management. The original account says SWAP used advisers within UK primary care and had different populations and systems. R03 R04	Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not merge different services and populations into the same program. Six-month group denominators and specific populations have not been read.	Distinguish original populations, delivery systems, motivational interviewing, stratified advice and usual management	Obtain original MI-NAV eligibility, service components, group comparisons and delivery-system materials.
16	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N16 · Comparative efficacyWhich intervention and outcome does MI-NAV's six-month null result concern?Required	At 6 months, the absence difference in the stratified-vocational-advice group is recorded as null. The evidence-list sample is ‘MI-NAV participants’. R03	Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not create six-month figures, CI, P or group analysis denominators. Do not add the same null result for motivational interviewing.	Time-point-specific interventions, denominators, effects, CI and tests	Obtain original six-month effects, denominators, models, CI and test materials.
17	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N17 · Comparative efficacyAre MI-NAV's two 12-month effects and denominator preserved separately?Required	In the 12-month trial of 509 people, stratified advice was −17.6 days (95% CI −33.0 to −2.2) and motivational interviewing −15.6 days (95% CI −31.0 to −0.2), each versus usual case management. R04	Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not repurpose 509 as group analysis counts or six-month denominators. Do not calculate direct superiority between the two interventions or new P values.	Time-point- and group-specific original effects, CI, denominators and analysis plans	Obtain 12-month group denominators, missingness, original models and direct intervention-comparison plans.
18	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N18 · Comparative efficacyAre MI-NAV time-point reports and overlapping SWAP authors independent replication?Required	The original account says MI-NAV authors overlap with SWAP and this is not independent confirmation by different research teams and funding sources; the parent R1 is retained. R01 R03 R04	Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not add two MI-NAV time-point reports as two new independent trials. Exact follow-up mapping of the same population has not been read externally.	Link reports, trials, time points, populations and author and funding relationships	Preserve original same-trial, time-point and participant mapping and funding and author connections.
19	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N19 · Comparative efficacyDo direct gaps remain by population, service and system for vocational rehabilitation in general?Required	The original account explicitly limits the verified scope to the specific early stepped service in UK primary care, rather than universal benefit of all vocational rehabilitation. R01 R03 R04	Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not extend specific benefits and time-point results into effectiveness or ineffectiveness of every rehabilitation program.	Direct comparisons for different populations, programs, delivery systems and outcomes	Direct comparative evidence with clearly specified population, system, service, period and outcome is needed.
20	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N20 · Comparative efficacyAre SWAP public and nonprofit funding and four involvement gaps distinguished?Required	SWAP is preserved as supported by NIHR, Arthritis Research UK and the UK Department of Health. R01	Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Details of free product or service provision, organizational affiliation, contracted external analysis and sponsor manuscript roles are unverified in this summary. Do not newly certify independence from public support alone.	Records of funding, free provision, affiliated authors and external analysis roles	Obtain separate funding, provision, affiliation, analysis, design and manuscript disclosures.
21	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N21 · Comparative efficacyAre MI-NAV funding labels distinguished from service delivery systems?Required	MI-NAV's funding field describes NAV delivery and overlapping SWAP authors. R03 R04	Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not turn the delivery organization into new certification of the exact research funding source, product provision or employee authors.	Separate materials on delivery, support, affiliation, analysis and author relationships	Obtain separate original support, delivery, affiliation and research-role disclosures.
22	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N22 · Supplementary harm evidenceWhat is the scope of serious adverse events not assessed and harm signals not reported?Required	The original SWAP account records that serious adverse events were not assessed as a separate endpoint and no harm signal was reported. Parent safety is Unknown. R01	Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not extend this to zero events, safety of all vocational rehabilitation or absence of MI-NAV harms.	Prespecified harms plans, collection, group events, exposure and denominators	Obtain trial-specific original harms plans, group events, denominators, exposure and discontinuation materials.
23	Unverified	Full text not readStored summary read	N23 · Supplementary harm evidenceDo direct gaps remain in long-term and rare harms and service discontinuation?Required	The original parent materials record a limited harms summary and follow-up period. R01 R03 R04	Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not certify evaluation of rare harms from long-term follow-up alone. Do not create harm counts, rates or discontinuation reasons absent from the original paper.	Time-point-specific exposure, discontinuation, severity, direct harms and follow-up	Actual service-specific exposure, discontinuation, long-term harms and rare-event materials are needed.
24	Unverified	Full text not readStored summary read	N24 · Supplementary harm evidenceAre application to other populations, repeated harm evidence and support instructions distinguished?Required	Compared with the universal vocational-rehabilitation question, current materials concern specific SWAP and MI-NAV services. R01 R03 R04	Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not newly establish effects or harms in other populations or instruct users on treatment or vocational-support actions.	Direct harms and application by population and program and same-population relationships	Link direct comparisons and harms materials for new populations by service.
25	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N25 · Comparative efficacyAre registration reports and external access status shown for each material?Required	SWAP registration ISRCTN52269669 is linked through its actual citation URL; the three other papers retain their original PubMed URLs. R01 R02 R03 R04	Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not label a registration URL as a paper's full text or abstract. Preserve unread status and Not applicable identifiers as originally recorded; link tests were not performed.	Original links and actual access records for summaries, papers, registration, protocol and SAP	Link original materials obtained by the user with their actual access status for each material.
26	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N26 · Comparative efficacyAre original dates, subclaim and parent values, Korean and English text, corrections and empty values retained?Required	The date 2026-08-26, empty correction and deliberation records, Korean and English text, parent B72, safety Unknown, axes and subclaim D are preserved. R01 R02 R03 R04	Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not turn this generation date into a new clinical verification date. Past cross-checking is not completion of this review.	Preservation of the whole parent verdict summary and selected verdict record, languages and history	Link new materials and decisions with preservation of the entire original text and separate change events.
27	Partly verified	Full text not readStored summary read	N27 · Comparative efficacyAre production completion and original-content review and independence certification distinguished?Supplementary	Original review-pending/production-eligible indicators and boundary-review requirements are preserved as history. The original content review remains incomplete; active-pending and completion flags for model, content and boundary reviews are false. R01 R02 R03 R04	Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. No new verdict, split or independence certification is made; added verdict units are 0 and the final independence count is not recorded.	Separate records of original candidate history, production and review	Proposal: Reflect only user-provided materials or decisions as separate events.

No items match your search or filter.

27 itemsWhat the statuses mean

Assessment scope

Stored-material review date: Not recorded
Original evidence cut-off: 2026-08-26
Scope actually checked: Existing review summaries and stored records of methodological application. Full papers, supplements, registrations, plans and original data were not read.
What the dates mean: This is the date the stored materials were checked, not the date of a new search of the clinical literature.
Population: Distinguish SWAP workers with musculoskeletal pain from MI-NAV populations, systems and delivery; no universal population is established
Ingredient, formulation and route: Early stepped physiotherapist vocational advice and case management in UK primary care and other programs delivered through NAV
Dose: Detailed original service components, frequency and adherence have not been read; no treatment or support instructions for users
Comparator: Detailed SWAP control management is unverified; MI-NAV stratified vocational advice or motivational interviewing versus usual case management
Measured outcome: The selected question is generalization across vocational rehabilitation; direct original outcomes are SWAP four-month self-reported absence days and MI-NAV absence at individual time points
Duration: SWAP four-month original results and 12-month follow-up; distinguish MI-NAV six- and 12-month reports
Questions outside this scope: Generalizing specific advice to all vocational rehabilitation; Repurposing time-point-specific MI-NAV effects as sustained SWAP effects; Mixing absence, pain, quality of life and economic benefit; Treatment or vocational-support instructions for users

Evidence and sources

The links below lead to the sources. A link alone does not mean the original source was read or its latest publication status verified.

R01 · Wynne-Jones G, Artus M, Bishop A, et al. Effectiveness and costs of a vocational advice service to improve work outcomes in patients with musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a cluster randomised trial (SWAP). Pain. 2018;159:128-138. PMID: 28976423.

PubMed

Material type: Trial report
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Findings recorded in the stored summary: 9.3 versus 14.4 days; mean difference −5.1 days; IRR 0.51 (0.26–0.99), P=0.048
Record level: Stored review summary; not results from directly reading the original paper or review
Study overlap and independent replication: The original SWAP trial and its registration report; MI-NAV reports at different time points retain the same-program relationship described in the original text, while exact follow-up population mapping has not been read. Family IDs link relationships rather than certify unique trial counts; reports, time points, reviews, sibling sheets and the same participants are not newly added as independent evidence.

Public availability, access and reading status by material
Material	Public availability	Access status	Actually read	Notes
local_summary	Original source link preserved	Summary read	Summary read	Preserved parent verdict summary
abstract	Original source link preserved	Not read	Not read	External material unread; a URL does not mean acquisition, reading or completed review
fulltext	No separate URL in the original material	Not read	Not read	External material unread; a URL does not mean acquisition, reading or completed review
registration	No separate URL in the original material	Not read	Not read	External material unread; a URL does not mean acquisition, reading or completed review
protocol_sap	No separate URL in the original material	Not read	Not read	External material unread; a URL does not mean acquisition, reading or completed review

R02 · ISRCTN52269669. SWAP - Study of Work And Pain.

Official source

Material type: Registration report
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Findings recorded in the stored summary: 9.3 versus 14.4 days; mean difference −5.1 days; IRR 0.51 (0.26–0.99), P=0.048
Record level: Linked context for the same original trial; no new certification as registration results
Study overlap and independent replication: The original SWAP trial and its registration report; MI-NAV reports at different time points retain the same-program relationship described in the original text, while exact follow-up population mapping has not been read. Family IDs link relationships rather than certify unique trial counts; reports, time points, reviews, sibling sheets and the same participants are not newly added as independent evidence.

Public availability, access and reading status by material
Material	Public availability	Access status	Actually read	Notes
local_summary	Original source link preserved	Summary read	Summary read	Preserved parent verdict summary
abstract	No separate URL in the original material	Not read	Not read	External material unread; a URL does not mean acquisition, reading or completed review
fulltext	No separate URL in the original material	Not read	Not read	External material unread; a URL does not mean acquisition, reading or completed review
registration	Original source link preserved	Not read	Not read	External material unread; a URL does not mean acquisition, reading or completed review
protocol_sap	No separate URL in the original material	Not read	Not read	External material unread; a URL does not mean acquisition, reading or completed review

R03 · Effectiveness of adding motivational interviewing or a stratified vocational advice intervention to usual case management…. PMID: 36428098.

PubMed

Material type: Trial report
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Findings recorded in the stored summary: Null absence difference in the stratified-vocational-advice group
Record level: Stored review summary; not results from directly reading the original paper or review
Study overlap and independent replication: The original SWAP trial and its registration report; MI-NAV reports at different time points retain the same-program relationship described in the original text, while exact follow-up population mapping has not been read. Family IDs link relationships rather than certify unique trial counts; reports, time points, reviews, sibling sheets and the same participants are not newly added as independent evidence.

Public availability, access and reading status by material
Material	Public availability	Access status	Actually read	Notes
local_summary	Original source link preserved	Summary read	Summary read	Preserved parent verdict summary
abstract	Original source link preserved	Not read	Not read	External material unread; a URL does not mean acquisition, reading or completed review
fulltext	No separate URL in the original material	Not read	Not read	External material unread; a URL does not mean acquisition, reading or completed review
registration	No separate URL in the original material	Not read	Not read	External material unread; a URL does not mean acquisition, reading or completed review
protocol_sap	No separate URL in the original material	Not read	Not read	External material unread; a URL does not mean acquisition, reading or completed review

R04 · Effectiveness of two vocational interventions on sickness absence and costs for people with musculoskeletal disorders. PMID: 40927942.

PubMed

Material type: Follow-up report
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Findings recorded in the stored summary: Stratified vocational advice −17.6 days (95% CI −33.0 to −2.2) and motivational interviewing −15.6 days (95% CI −31.0 to −0.2), each versus usual case management
Record level: Stored review summary; not results from directly reading the original paper or review
Study overlap and independent replication: The original SWAP trial and its registration report; MI-NAV reports at different time points retain the same-program relationship described in the original text, while exact follow-up population mapping has not been read. Family IDs link relationships rather than certify unique trial counts; reports, time points, reviews, sibling sheets and the same participants are not newly added as independent evidence.

Public availability, access and reading status by material
Material	Public availability	Access status	Actually read	Notes
local_summary	Original source link preserved	Summary read	Summary read	Preserved parent verdict summary
abstract	Original source link preserved	Not read	Not read	External material unread; a URL does not mean acquisition, reading or completed review
fulltext	No separate URL in the original material	Not read	Not read	External material unread; a URL does not mean acquisition, reading or completed review
registration	No separate URL in the original material	Not read	Not read	External material unread; a URL does not mean acquisition, reading or completed review
protocol_sap	No separate URL in the original material	Not read	Not read	External material unread; a URL does not mean acquisition, reading or completed review

Report counts versus independent study counts

The original SWAP trial and its registration report; MI-NAV reports at different time points retain the same-program relationship described in the original text, while exact follow-up population mapping has not been read. Family IDs link relationships rather than certify unique trial counts; reports, time points, reviews, sibling sheets and the same participants are not newly added as independent evidence.

Review criteria

Version 1.0 · Criteria record date 2026-10-06. These are Chamgap's own application conditions, informed by the referenced methods. They do not constitute official assessment-tool certification or a new efficacy score.

N01 · Are the general vocational-rehabilitation verdict and the specific SWAP parent verdict distinguished?

Required materials and conditions: Separate records of the subclaim, grade and note and the parent verdict
Conditions for verification: Separate records of the subclaim, grade and note and the parent verdict
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

N02 · Are SWAP workers with musculoskeletal pain and other vocational-rehabilitation populations the same?

Required materials and conditions: Original materials on occupation, baseline work status, condition, eligibility and denominators
Conditions for verification: Original materials on occupation, baseline work status, condition, eligibility and denominators
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

N03 · What program was early stepped physiotherapist vocational advice and case management?

Required materials and conditions: Study records of providers, services, support, accompanying management and actual exposure
Conditions for verification: Study records of providers, services, support, accompanying management and actual exposure
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

N04 · What were SWAP control management and the comparator for the generalization question?

Required materials and conditions: Original group records of usual management, contact, additional support and existing treatment
Conditions for verification: Original group records of usual management, contact, additional support and existing treatment
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

N05 · Are cluster allocation across 6 practices and the denominator of 338 participants distinguished?

Required materials and conditions: Original materials on clusters, individuals, allocation and analysis denominators, cluster sizes and adjustment
Conditions for verification: Original materials on clusters, individuals, allocation and analysis denominators, cluster sizes and adjustment
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

N06 · Are four-month self-reported absence days the same outcome for all vocational rehabilitation?

Required materials and conditions: Absence definitions, recall period, questionnaire, denominators and analysis units
Conditions for verification: Absence definitions, recall period, questionnaire, denominators and analysis units
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

N07 · Are mean absence days, mean difference and IRR different effect measures?

Required materials and conditions: Original group means, between-group mean difference, incidence rate ratio, CI and tests
Conditions for verification: Original group means, between-group mean difference, incidence rate ratio, CI and tests
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

N08 · Are borderline statistical results distinguished from certification of universal benefit?

Required materials and conditions: Original effects, precision, prespecified plans and scope of application
Conditions for verification: Original effects, precision, prespecified plans and scope of application
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

N09 · Do gaps remain in four-month response, attrition and analysis populations?

Required materials and conditions: Original group questionnaire returns, missingness, analysis populations and sensitivity analyses
Conditions for verification: Original group questionnaire returns, missingness, analysis populations and sensitivity analyses
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

N10 · Are allocation concealment, blinding and self-report measurement procedures directly described?

Required materials and conditions: Cluster allocation, concealment, measurement and analysis procedures and original methods
Conditions for verification: Cluster allocation, concealment, measurement and analysis procedures and original methods
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

N11 · What were the prespecified primary endpoint, registration and success threshold?

Required materials and conditions: Original registration, protocol, SAP, primary hierarchy and clinical-importance materials
Conditions for verification: Original registration, protocol, SAP, primary hierarchy and clinical-importance materials
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

N12 · Are net societal benefit, absence costs and healthcare costs distinguished from generalized cost-effectiveness?

Required materials and conditions: Original setting, currency, perspective, period, costs and uncertainty materials
Conditions for verification: Original setting, currency, perspective, period, costs and uncertainty materials
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

N13 · Can pain, quality of life and other secondary outcomes replace absence effects?

Required materials and conditions: Outcome-specific definitions, hierarchy, denominators, effects and intervals
Conditions for verification: Outcome-specific definitions, hierarchy, denominators, effects and intervals
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

N14 · Are SWAP's 12-month follow-up and MI-NAV's 12-month results the same?

Required materials and conditions: Trial-specific follow-up periods, time points, effects and denominators
Conditions for verification: Trial-specific follow-up periods, time points, effects and denominators
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

N15 · What were MI-NAV populations, NAV delivery and the three intervention comparisons?

Required materials and conditions: Distinguish original populations, delivery systems, motivational interviewing, stratified advice and usual management
Conditions for verification: Distinguish original populations, delivery systems, motivational interviewing, stratified advice and usual management
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

N16 · Which intervention and outcome does MI-NAV's six-month null result concern?

Required materials and conditions: Time-point-specific interventions, denominators, effects, CI and tests
Conditions for verification: Time-point-specific interventions, denominators, effects, CI and tests
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

N17 · Are MI-NAV's two 12-month effects and denominator preserved separately?

Required materials and conditions: Time-point- and group-specific original effects, CI, denominators and analysis plans
Conditions for verification: Time-point- and group-specific original effects, CI, denominators and analysis plans
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

N18 · Are MI-NAV time-point reports and overlapping SWAP authors independent replication?

Required materials and conditions: Link reports, trials, time points, populations and author and funding relationships
Conditions for verification: Link reports, trials, time points, populations and author and funding relationships
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

N19 · Do direct gaps remain by population, service and system for vocational rehabilitation in general?

Required materials and conditions: Direct comparisons for different populations, programs, delivery systems and outcomes
Conditions for verification: Direct comparisons for different populations, programs, delivery systems and outcomes
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

N20 · Are SWAP public and nonprofit funding and four involvement gaps distinguished?

Required materials and conditions: Records of funding, free provision, affiliated authors and external analysis roles
Conditions for verification: Records of funding, free provision, affiliated authors and external analysis roles
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

N21 · Are MI-NAV funding labels distinguished from service delivery systems?

Required materials and conditions: Separate materials on delivery, support, affiliation, analysis and author relationships
Conditions for verification: Separate materials on delivery, support, affiliation, analysis and author relationships
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

N22 · What is the scope of serious adverse events not assessed and harm signals not reported?

Required materials and conditions: Prespecified harms plans, collection, group events, exposure and denominators
Conditions for verification: Prespecified harms plans, collection, group events, exposure and denominators
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

N23 · Do direct gaps remain in long-term and rare harms and service discontinuation?

Required materials and conditions: Time-point-specific exposure, discontinuation, severity, direct harms and follow-up
Conditions for verification: Time-point-specific exposure, discontinuation, severity, direct harms and follow-up
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

N24 · Are application to other populations, repeated harm evidence and support instructions distinguished?

Required materials and conditions: Direct harms and application by population and program and same-population relationships
Conditions for verification: Direct harms and application by population and program and same-population relationships
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

N25 · Are registration reports and external access status shown for each material?

Required materials and conditions: Original links and actual access records for summaries, papers, registration, protocol and SAP
Conditions for verification: Original links and actual access records for summaries, papers, registration, protocol and SAP
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

N26 · Are original dates, subclaim and parent values, Korean and English text, corrections and empty values retained?

Required materials and conditions: Preservation of the whole parent verdict summary and selected verdict record, languages and history
Conditions for verification: Preservation of the whole parent verdict summary and selected verdict record, languages and history
Requirement and applicability: Required
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

N27 · Are production completion and original-content review and independence certification distinguished?

Required materials and conditions: Separate records of original candidate history, production and review
Conditions for verification: Separate records of original candidate history, production and review
Requirement and applicability: Supplementary
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

Referenced methods and the sections actually reviewed

M03 · Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08

Official methodology · §3.1, §3.2.1–3.2.3, MECIR C5/C7/C13

Referenced principle: Clearly record the question, eligibility conditions and reasons for changes, and distinguish variations in interventions.
Extent of review: Preserved methodology connections were reused for preparation. No new review of methodological content, reassessment or external-link checks were performed.

M04 · Cochrane Handbook 6.5.1 (2025), chapter updated 2025-03

Official methodology · §4.5, §4.6.1–4.6.3, MECIR C42

Referenced principle: Distinguish studies from reports and link them; do not omit a study solely because results are unreported.
Extent of review: Preserved methodology connections were reused for preparation. No new review of methodological content, reassessment or external-link checks were performed.

M08 · Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10

Official methodology · §8.1–8.2.3, Table 8.2.a

Referenced principle: Define the outcome and effect of interest, then examine randomization, deviations, missing data, measurement and selective reporting.
Extent of review: Preserved methodology connections were reused for preparation. No new review of methodological content, reassessment or external-link checks were performed.

M15 · Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08

Official methodology · §15.2.4, §15.3.1–15.3.3

Referenced principle: Distinguish effect estimates, intervals, importance and applicability. Sample size alone does not determine precision.
Extent of review: Preserved methodology connections were reused for preparation. No new review of methodological content, reassessment or external-link checks were performed.

M19 · Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10

Official methodology · §19.1.2, §19.2.1–19.2.4

Referenced principle: Harm questions may require different designs, populations and follow-up from efficacy questions. Case reports do not establish incidence rates.
Extent of review: Preserved methodology connections were reused for preparation. No new review of methodological content, reassessment or external-link checks were performed.

What the statuses mean

Partly verified: Some information exists in the preserved review summary; detailed original materials remain unverified. This does not certify a passed review or clinical efficacy.
Unverified: Detailed materials for the selected condition could not be established within the stored scope; this does not mean zero effect, zero studies or safety
Review incomplete: Review of existing content incomplete
Met: Use only within the relevant conditions after existing content review; no automatic designation in this preparation
Not reported: Distinguish only within materials actually read; do not turn unread external materials into unreported findings
Inaccessible: Not applied during this preparation because actual access was not tested
Not applicable: Use with a reason for non-applicability based on an explicit question boundary
Conflicting data: Judge after actual material comparison; review was not performed during this preparation
Insufficient evidence for the conditions: Do not use as a clinical grade encompassing currently unread materials

Change history

2026-10-11 · Public page/material version 1.0

Public pages and materials were prepared from the existing 27 items. No new clinical search, verification-status change or scoring was performed.

The stored-material review date (Not recorded) and original evidence cut-off (2026-08-26) were retained unchanged.

Researcher downloads

These materials provide the same evidence, scope and verification status as this page.

View all item details

N01 · Are the general vocational-rehabilitation verdict and the specific SWAP parent verdict distinguished?

Current findings: The subclaim is ‘Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation’, with original grade D and a note about MI-NAV results at different time points and the lack of independent confirmation. The parent concerns the specific SWAP comparison: B, 72 points, safety Unknown.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Why unverified: Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Subclaim score, status and axes are absent; do not fill them with parent values. No new verdict that all vocational rehabilitation is ineffective is made.
Reason for missing information: Subclaim score, status and axes are absent; do not fill them with parent values. No new verdict that all vocational rehabilitation is ineffective is made.
Required materials and conditions: Separate records of the subclaim, grade and note and the parent verdict
Materials to obtain first: Subclaim score, status and axes are absent; do not fill them with parent values. No new verdict that all vocational rehabilitation is ineffective is made.
Further research: If additional material is provided, link direct evidence for each population, program and outcome.
Remaining uncertainty: Unread or unverified materials do not mean zero effect, zero events, safety or new clinical certification.
Conditions for verification: Separate records of the subclaim, grade and note and the parent verdict
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

Related sources R01 R03 R04

N02 · Are SWAP workers with musculoskeletal pain and other vocational-rehabilitation populations the same?

Current findings: SWAP included 338 workers with musculoskeletal pain in UK primary care.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Why unverified: Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Detailed eligibility by occupation, condition and baseline absence and direct effects in other populations have not been read. Do not automatically apply this to other rehabilitation populations.
Reason for missing information: Detailed eligibility by occupation, condition and baseline absence and direct effects in other populations have not been read. Do not automatically apply this to other rehabilitation populations.
Required materials and conditions: Original materials on occupation, baseline work status, condition, eligibility and denominators
Materials to obtain first: Detailed eligibility by occupation, condition and baseline absence and direct effects in other populations have not been read. Do not automatically apply this to other rehabilitation populations.
Further research: Obtain original eligibility, baseline characteristics, work and absence status and direct comparisons for each population.
Remaining uncertainty: Unread or unverified materials do not mean zero effect, zero events, safety or new clinical certification.
Conditions for verification: Original materials on occupation, baseline work status, condition, eligibility and denominators
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

Related sources R01

N03 · What program was early stepped physiotherapist vocational advice and case management?

Current findings: The original intervention was vocational advice and case management by primary-care physiotherapists, an early stepped service in UK primary care.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Why unverified: Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not equate it with all vocational rehabilitation, employment support or other programs, or create treatment or support instructions for users. Components, frequency and adherence have not been read.
Reason for missing information: Do not equate it with all vocational rehabilitation, employment support or other programs, or create treatment or support instructions for users. Components, frequency and adherence have not been read.
Required materials and conditions: Study records of providers, services, support, accompanying management and actual exposure
Materials to obtain first: Do not equate it with all vocational rehabilitation, employment support or other programs, or create treatment or support instructions for users. Components, frequency and adherence have not been read.
Further research: Obtain original service components, providers, start time, actual exposure and accompanying management materials.
Remaining uncertainty: Unread or unverified materials do not mean zero effect, zero events, safety or new clinical certification.
Conditions for verification: Study records of providers, services, support, accompanying management and actual exposure
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

Related sources R01

N04 · What were SWAP control management and the comparator for the generalization question?

Current findings: SWAP was a cluster-randomized trial comparing 158 intervention and 180 control participants.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Why unverified: Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Specific control management, contact and service exposure are not established by this summary. Do not recast it as the effects of all services versus no support.
Reason for missing information: Specific control management, contact and service exposure are not established by this summary. Do not recast it as the effects of all services versus no support.
Required materials and conditions: Original group records of usual management, contact, additional support and existing treatment
Materials to obtain first: Specific control management, contact and service exposure are not established by this summary. Do not recast it as the effects of all services versus no support.
Further research: Obtain original control and accompanying management, contact differences and direct comparisons for the generalization question.
Remaining uncertainty: Unread or unverified materials do not mean zero effect, zero events, safety or new clinical certification.
Conditions for verification: Original group records of usual management, contact, additional support and existing treatment
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

Related sources R01

N05 · Are cluster allocation across 6 practices and the denominator of 338 participants distinguished?

Current findings: SWAP randomized 6 general practices as clusters and compared 338 participants, 158/180.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Why unverified: Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not treat 338 people as independent allocation units or create cluster allocations, ICC or design effects absent from the original paper.
Reason for missing information: Do not treat 338 people as independent allocation units or create cluster allocations, ICC or design effects absent from the original paper.
Required materials and conditions: Original materials on clusters, individuals, allocation and analysis denominators, cluster sizes and adjustment
Materials to obtain first: Do not treat 338 people as independent allocation units or create cluster allocations, ICC or design effects absent from the original paper.
Further research: Obtain original cluster allocation, sizes, analysis adjustment and participant flow materials.
Remaining uncertainty: Unread or unverified materials do not mean zero effect, zero events, safety or new clinical certification.
Conditions for verification: Original materials on clusters, individuals, allocation and analysis denominators, cluster sizes and adjustment
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

Related sources R01

N06 · Are four-month self-reported absence days the same outcome for all vocational rehabilitation?

Current findings: The direct endpoint was patient-questionnaire-reported absence days over 4 months.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Why unverified: Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not equate it with return to work, work participation, job retention, income or all work function. Detailed outcome definitions and questionnaire procedures have not been read.
Reason for missing information: Do not equate it with return to work, work participation, job retention, income or all work function. Detailed outcome definitions and questionnaire procedures have not been read.
Required materials and conditions: Absence definitions, recall period, questionnaire, denominators and analysis units
Materials to obtain first: Do not equate it with return to work, work participation, job retention, income or all work function. Detailed outcome definitions and questionnaire procedures have not been read.
Further research: Obtain original absence definitions, time points, questionnaire and denominators separately from direct material for other outcomes.
Remaining uncertainty: Unread or unverified materials do not mean zero effect, zero events, safety or new clinical certification.
Conditions for verification: Absence definitions, recall period, questionnaire, denominators and analysis units
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

Related sources R01

N07 · Are mean absence days, mean difference and IRR different effect measures?

Current findings: The original account gives 4-month means of 9.3 versus 14.4 days, mean difference −5.1 days, IRR 0.51 (95% CI 0.26–0.99), P=0.048.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Why unverified: Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not change IRR into a recurrence risk ratio or return-to-work proportion. No new differences, rates, denominators or CI are calculated. The mean-difference CI and analysis model have not been read.
Reason for missing information: Do not change IRR into a recurrence risk ratio or return-to-work proportion. No new differences, rates, denominators or CI are calculated. The mean-difference CI and analysis model have not been read.
Required materials and conditions: Original group means, between-group mean difference, incidence rate ratio, CI and tests
Materials to obtain first: Do not change IRR into a recurrence risk ratio or return-to-work proportion. No new differences, rates, denominators or CI are calculated. The mean-difference CI and analysis model have not been read.
Further research: Obtain the original absence-analysis model, cluster adjustment and separate estimation tables for mean difference and IRR.
Remaining uncertainty: Unread or unverified materials do not mean zero effect, zero events, safety or new clinical certification.
Conditions for verification: Original group means, between-group mean difference, incidence rate ratio, CI and tests
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

Related sources R01

N08 · Are borderline statistical results distinguished from certification of universal benefit?

Current findings: The original account notes only 6 practices and borderline CI and P results.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Why unverified: Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not extend significance into certification of benefit for every population, delivery system and duration. Do not replace the parent's unrecorded precision with a new value.
Reason for missing information: Do not extend significance into certification of benefit for every population, delivery system and duration. Do not replace the parent's unrecorded precision with a new value.
Required materials and conditions: Original effects, precision, prespecified plans and scope of application
Materials to obtain first: Do not extend significance into certification of benefit for every population, delivery system and duration. Do not replace the parent's unrecorded precision with a new value.
Further research: Link populations, periods, effects, CI and scope of application for new direct comparisons separately.
Remaining uncertainty: Unread or unverified materials do not mean zero effect, zero events, safety or new clinical certification.
Conditions for verification: Original effects, precision, prespecified plans and scope of application
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

Related sources R01

N09 · Do gaps remain in four-month response, attrition and analysis populations?

Current findings: The original abstract did not provide 4-month questionnaire response, so the preserved account says attrition cannot be estimated.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Why unverified: Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not certify the randomized denominator of 338 as the questionnaire-analysis denominator or calculate attrition.
Reason for missing information: Do not certify the randomized denominator of 338 as the questionnaire-analysis denominator or calculate attrition.
Required materials and conditions: Original group questionnaire returns, missingness, analysis populations and sensitivity analyses
Materials to obtain first: Do not certify the randomized denominator of 338 as the questionnaire-analysis denominator or calculate attrition.
Further research: Obtain original questionnaire returns, group reasons for missingness, analysis populations and sensitivity-analysis materials.
Remaining uncertainty: Unread or unverified materials do not mean zero effect, zero events, safety or new clinical certification.
Conditions for verification: Original group questionnaire returns, missingness, analysis populations and sensitivity analyses
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

Related sources R01

N10 · Are allocation concealment, blinding and self-report measurement procedures directly described?

Current findings: The information that SWAP was cluster randomized and used patient-questionnaire outcomes is preserved.
Verification status: Unverified
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Why unverified: Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Detailed concealment and participant, assessor and analyst blinding are unverified in this summary. Do not use the B0 axis as certification of a current review.
Reason for missing information: Detailed concealment and participant, assessor and analyst blinding are unverified in this summary. Do not use the B0 axis as certification of a current review.
Required materials and conditions: Cluster allocation, concealment, measurement and analysis procedures and original methods
Materials to obtain first: Detailed concealment and participant, assessor and analyst blinding are unverified in this summary. Do not use the B0 axis as certification of a current review.
Further research: Obtain original trial methods and measurement and analysis procedures.
Remaining uncertainty: Unread or unverified materials do not mean zero effect, zero events, safety or new clinical certification.
Conditions for verification: Cluster allocation, concealment, measurement and analysis procedures and original methods
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

Related sources R01

N11 · What were the prespecified primary endpoint, registration and success threshold?

Current findings: 4-month absence days were the prespecified primary endpoint, with follow-up to 12 months. A two-sided 5% level and 80% power were declared, but an important absence-day difference was not set as a success threshold.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Why unverified: Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not recast test level and power as a clinical success threshold. Registration, protocol and SAP have not been read in this work.
Reason for missing information: Do not recast test level and power as a clinical success threshold. Registration, protocol and SAP have not been read in this work.
Required materials and conditions: Original registration, protocol, SAP, primary hierarchy and clinical-importance materials
Materials to obtain first: Do not recast test level and power as a clinical success threshold. Registration, protocol and SAP have not been read in this work.
Further research: Link original registration, SAP, changes and importance plans separately.
Remaining uncertainty: Unread or unverified materials do not mean zero effect, zero events, safety or new clinical certification.
Conditions for verification: Original registration, protocol, SAP, primary hierarchy and clinical-importance materials
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

Related sources R01 R02

N12 · Are net societal benefit, absence costs and healthcare costs distinguished from generalized cost-effectiveness?

Current findings: The original account gives net societal benefit of £733 per person and preserves the original explanation of £748 lower absence costs and £15 higher healthcare costs.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Why unverified: Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not add new calculations or exchange rates or transfer these to cost-effectiveness in other countries or benefits of every rehabilitation program. Cost CI and detailed perspective have not been read.
Reason for missing information: Do not add new calculations or exchange rates or transfer these to cost-effectiveness in other countries or benefits of every rehabilitation program. Cost CI and detailed perspective have not been read.
Required materials and conditions: Original setting, currency, perspective, period, costs and uncertainty materials
Materials to obtain first: Do not add new calculations or exchange rates or transfer these to cost-effectiveness in other countries or benefits of every rehabilitation program. Cost CI and detailed perspective have not been read.
Further research: Obtain the original economic analysis period, perspective, cost components and uncertainty and materials from other systems.
Remaining uncertainty: Unread or unverified materials do not mean zero effect, zero events, safety or new clinical certification.
Conditions for verification: Original setting, currency, perspective, period, costs and uncertainty materials
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

Related sources R01

N13 · Can pain, quality of life and other secondary outcomes replace absence effects?

Current findings: The original account explicitly says pain and quality-of-life secondary outcomes should not be used to stand in for absence benefits.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Why unverified: Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not create secondary-outcome figures or superiority absent from this summary. Do not fill in universal vocational-rehabilitation function.
Reason for missing information: Do not create secondary-outcome figures or superiority absent from this summary. Do not fill in universal vocational-rehabilitation function.
Required materials and conditions: Outcome-specific definitions, hierarchy, denominators, effects and intervals
Materials to obtain first: Do not create secondary-outcome figures or superiority absent from this summary. Do not fill in universal vocational-rehabilitation function.
Further research: Obtain secondary-outcome tables and prespecified hierarchy and multiplicity plans for each endpoint.
Remaining uncertainty: Unread or unverified materials do not mean zero effect, zero events, safety or new clinical certification.
Conditions for verification: Outcome-specific definitions, hierarchy, denominators, effects and intervals
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

Related sources R01

N14 · Are SWAP's 12-month follow-up and MI-NAV's 12-month results the same?

Current findings: SWAP is recorded as followed to 12 months, while its direct figures concern 4 months. MI-NAV has separate 12-month results.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Why unverified: Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not fill SWAP's sustained effects with MI-NAV's 12-month effects. SWAP follow-up figures are absent from this summary.
Reason for missing information: Do not fill SWAP's sustained effects with MI-NAV's 12-month effects. SWAP follow-up figures are absent from this summary.
Required materials and conditions: Trial-specific follow-up periods, time points, effects and denominators
Materials to obtain first: Do not fill SWAP's sustained effects with MI-NAV's 12-month effects. SWAP follow-up figures are absent from this summary.
Further research: Link original SWAP results at each time point and MI-NAV materials by trial.
Remaining uncertainty: Unread or unverified materials do not mean zero effect, zero events, safety or new clinical certification.
Conditions for verification: Trial-specific follow-up periods, time points, effects and denominators
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

Related sources R01 R04

N15 · What were MI-NAV populations, NAV delivery and the three intervention comparisons?

Current findings: MI-NAV compared motivational interviewing or stratified vocational advice delivered through NAV with usual case management. The original account says SWAP used advisers within UK primary care and had different populations and systems.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Why unverified: Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not merge different services and populations into the same program. Six-month group denominators and specific populations have not been read.
Reason for missing information: Do not merge different services and populations into the same program. Six-month group denominators and specific populations have not been read.
Required materials and conditions: Distinguish original populations, delivery systems, motivational interviewing, stratified advice and usual management
Materials to obtain first: Do not merge different services and populations into the same program. Six-month group denominators and specific populations have not been read.
Further research: Obtain original MI-NAV eligibility, service components, group comparisons and delivery-system materials.
Remaining uncertainty: Unread or unverified materials do not mean zero effect, zero events, safety or new clinical certification.
Conditions for verification: Distinguish original populations, delivery systems, motivational interviewing, stratified advice and usual management
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

Related sources R03 R04

N16 · Which intervention and outcome does MI-NAV's six-month null result concern?

Current findings: At 6 months, the absence difference in the stratified-vocational-advice group is recorded as null. The evidence-list sample is ‘MI-NAV participants’.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Why unverified: Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not create six-month figures, CI, P or group analysis denominators. Do not add the same null result for motivational interviewing.
Reason for missing information: Do not create six-month figures, CI, P or group analysis denominators. Do not add the same null result for motivational interviewing.
Required materials and conditions: Time-point-specific interventions, denominators, effects, CI and tests
Materials to obtain first: Do not create six-month figures, CI, P or group analysis denominators. Do not add the same null result for motivational interviewing.
Further research: Obtain original six-month effects, denominators, models, CI and test materials.
Remaining uncertainty: Unread or unverified materials do not mean zero effect, zero events, safety or new clinical certification.
Conditions for verification: Time-point-specific interventions, denominators, effects, CI and tests
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

Related sources R03

N17 · Are MI-NAV's two 12-month effects and denominator preserved separately?

Current findings: In the 12-month trial of 509 people, stratified advice was −17.6 days (95% CI −33.0 to −2.2) and motivational interviewing −15.6 days (95% CI −31.0 to −0.2), each versus usual case management.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Why unverified: Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not repurpose 509 as group analysis counts or six-month denominators. Do not calculate direct superiority between the two interventions or new P values.
Reason for missing information: Do not repurpose 509 as group analysis counts or six-month denominators. Do not calculate direct superiority between the two interventions or new P values.
Required materials and conditions: Time-point- and group-specific original effects, CI, denominators and analysis plans
Materials to obtain first: Do not repurpose 509 as group analysis counts or six-month denominators. Do not calculate direct superiority between the two interventions or new P values.
Further research: Obtain 12-month group denominators, missingness, original models and direct intervention-comparison plans.
Remaining uncertainty: Unread or unverified materials do not mean zero effect, zero events, safety or new clinical certification.
Conditions for verification: Time-point- and group-specific original effects, CI, denominators and analysis plans
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

Related sources R04

N18 · Are MI-NAV time-point reports and overlapping SWAP authors independent replication?

Current findings: The original account says MI-NAV authors overlap with SWAP and this is not independent confirmation by different research teams and funding sources; the parent R1 is retained.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Why unverified: Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not add two MI-NAV time-point reports as two new independent trials. Exact follow-up mapping of the same population has not been read externally.
Reason for missing information: Do not add two MI-NAV time-point reports as two new independent trials. Exact follow-up mapping of the same population has not been read externally.
Required materials and conditions: Link reports, trials, time points, populations and author and funding relationships
Materials to obtain first: Do not add two MI-NAV time-point reports as two new independent trials. Exact follow-up mapping of the same population has not been read externally.
Further research: Preserve original same-trial, time-point and participant mapping and funding and author connections.
Remaining uncertainty: Unread or unverified materials do not mean zero effect, zero events, safety or new clinical certification.
Conditions for verification: Link reports, trials, time points, populations and author and funding relationships
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

Related sources R01 R03 R04

N19 · Do direct gaps remain by population, service and system for vocational rehabilitation in general?

Current findings: The original account explicitly limits the verified scope to the specific early stepped service in UK primary care, rather than universal benefit of all vocational rehabilitation.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Why unverified: Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not extend specific benefits and time-point results into effectiveness or ineffectiveness of every rehabilitation program.
Reason for missing information: Do not extend specific benefits and time-point results into effectiveness or ineffectiveness of every rehabilitation program.
Required materials and conditions: Direct comparisons for different populations, programs, delivery systems and outcomes
Materials to obtain first: Do not extend specific benefits and time-point results into effectiveness or ineffectiveness of every rehabilitation program.
Further research: Direct comparative evidence with clearly specified population, system, service, period and outcome is needed.
Remaining uncertainty: Unread or unverified materials do not mean zero effect, zero events, safety or new clinical certification.
Conditions for verification: Direct comparisons for different populations, programs, delivery systems and outcomes
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

Related sources R01 R03 R04

N20 · Are SWAP public and nonprofit funding and four involvement gaps distinguished?

Current findings: SWAP is preserved as supported by NIHR, Arthritis Research UK and the UK Department of Health.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Why unverified: Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Details of free product or service provision, organizational affiliation, contracted external analysis and sponsor manuscript roles are unverified in this summary. Do not newly certify independence from public support alone.
Reason for missing information: Details of free product or service provision, organizational affiliation, contracted external analysis and sponsor manuscript roles are unverified in this summary. Do not newly certify independence from public support alone.
Required materials and conditions: Records of funding, free provision, affiliated authors and external analysis roles
Materials to obtain first: Details of free product or service provision, organizational affiliation, contracted external analysis and sponsor manuscript roles are unverified in this summary. Do not newly certify independence from public support alone.
Further research: Obtain separate funding, provision, affiliation, analysis, design and manuscript disclosures.
Remaining uncertainty: Unread or unverified materials do not mean zero effect, zero events, safety or new clinical certification.
Conditions for verification: Records of funding, free provision, affiliated authors and external analysis roles
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

Related sources R01

N21 · Are MI-NAV funding labels distinguished from service delivery systems?

Current findings: MI-NAV's funding field describes NAV delivery and overlapping SWAP authors.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Why unverified: Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not turn the delivery organization into new certification of the exact research funding source, product provision or employee authors.
Reason for missing information: Do not turn the delivery organization into new certification of the exact research funding source, product provision or employee authors.
Required materials and conditions: Separate materials on delivery, support, affiliation, analysis and author relationships
Materials to obtain first: Do not turn the delivery organization into new certification of the exact research funding source, product provision or employee authors.
Further research: Obtain separate original support, delivery, affiliation and research-role disclosures.
Remaining uncertainty: Unread or unverified materials do not mean zero effect, zero events, safety or new clinical certification.
Conditions for verification: Separate materials on delivery, support, affiliation, analysis and author relationships
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

Related sources R03 R04

N22 · What is the scope of serious adverse events not assessed and harm signals not reported?

Current findings: The original SWAP account records that serious adverse events were not assessed as a separate endpoint and no harm signal was reported. Parent safety is Unknown.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Why unverified: Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not extend this to zero events, safety of all vocational rehabilitation or absence of MI-NAV harms.
Reason for missing information: Do not extend this to zero events, safety of all vocational rehabilitation or absence of MI-NAV harms.
Required materials and conditions: Prespecified harms plans, collection, group events, exposure and denominators
Materials to obtain first: Do not extend this to zero events, safety of all vocational rehabilitation or absence of MI-NAV harms.
Further research: Obtain trial-specific original harms plans, group events, denominators, exposure and discontinuation materials.
Remaining uncertainty: Unread or unverified materials do not mean zero effect, zero events, safety or new clinical certification.
Conditions for verification: Prespecified harms plans, collection, group events, exposure and denominators
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

Related sources R01

N23 · Do direct gaps remain in long-term and rare harms and service discontinuation?

Current findings: The original parent materials record a limited harms summary and follow-up period.
Verification status: Unverified
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Why unverified: Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not certify evaluation of rare harms from long-term follow-up alone. Do not create harm counts, rates or discontinuation reasons absent from the original paper.
Reason for missing information: Do not certify evaluation of rare harms from long-term follow-up alone. Do not create harm counts, rates or discontinuation reasons absent from the original paper.
Required materials and conditions: Time-point-specific exposure, discontinuation, severity, direct harms and follow-up
Materials to obtain first: Do not certify evaluation of rare harms from long-term follow-up alone. Do not create harm counts, rates or discontinuation reasons absent from the original paper.
Further research: Actual service-specific exposure, discontinuation, long-term harms and rare-event materials are needed.
Remaining uncertainty: Unread or unverified materials do not mean zero effect, zero events, safety or new clinical certification.
Conditions for verification: Time-point-specific exposure, discontinuation, severity, direct harms and follow-up
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

Related sources R01 R03 R04

N24 · Are application to other populations, repeated harm evidence and support instructions distinguished?

Current findings: Compared with the universal vocational-rehabilitation question, current materials concern specific SWAP and MI-NAV services.
Verification status: Unverified
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Why unverified: Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not newly establish effects or harms in other populations or instruct users on treatment or vocational-support actions.
Reason for missing information: Do not newly establish effects or harms in other populations or instruct users on treatment or vocational-support actions.
Required materials and conditions: Direct harms and application by population and program and same-population relationships
Materials to obtain first: Do not newly establish effects or harms in other populations or instruct users on treatment or vocational-support actions.
Further research: Link direct comparisons and harms materials for new populations by service.
Remaining uncertainty: Unread or unverified materials do not mean zero effect, zero events, safety or new clinical certification.
Conditions for verification: Direct harms and application by population and program and same-population relationships
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

Related sources R01 R03 R04

N25 · Are registration reports and external access status shown for each material?

Current findings: SWAP registration ISRCTN52269669 is linked through its actual citation URL; the three other papers retain their original PubMed URLs.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Why unverified: Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not label a registration URL as a paper's full text or abstract. Preserve unread status and Not applicable identifiers as originally recorded; link tests were not performed.
Reason for missing information: Do not label a registration URL as a paper's full text or abstract. Preserve unread status and Not applicable identifiers as originally recorded; link tests were not performed.
Required materials and conditions: Original links and actual access records for summaries, papers, registration, protocol and SAP
Materials to obtain first: Do not label a registration URL as a paper's full text or abstract. Preserve unread status and Not applicable identifiers as originally recorded; link tests were not performed.
Further research: Link original materials obtained by the user with their actual access status for each material.
Remaining uncertainty: Unread or unverified materials do not mean zero effect, zero events, safety or new clinical certification.
Conditions for verification: Original links and actual access records for summaries, papers, registration, protocol and SAP
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

Related sources R01 R02 R03 R04

N26 · Are original dates, subclaim and parent values, Korean and English text, corrections and empty values retained?

Current findings: The date 2026-08-26, empty correction and deliberation records, Korean and English text, parent B72, safety Unknown, axes and subclaim D are preserved.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Why unverified: Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Do not turn this generation date into a new clinical verification date. Past cross-checking is not completion of this review.
Reason for missing information: Do not turn this generation date into a new clinical verification date. Past cross-checking is not completion of this review.
Required materials and conditions: Preservation of the whole parent verdict summary and selected verdict record, languages and history
Materials to obtain first: Do not turn this generation date into a new clinical verification date. Past cross-checking is not completion of this review.
Further research: Link new materials and decisions with preservation of the entire original text and separate change events.
Remaining uncertainty: Unread or unverified materials do not mean zero effect, zero events, safety or new clinical certification.
Conditions for verification: Preservation of the whole parent verdict summary and selected verdict record, languages and history
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

Related sources R01 R02 R03 R04

N27 · Are production completion and original-content review and independence certification distinguished?

Current findings: Original review-pending/production-eligible indicators and boundary-review requirements are preserved as history. The original content review remains incomplete; active-pending and completion flags for model, content and boundary reviews are false.
Verification status: Partly verified
Materials actually read: Summary read; external materials not read
Why unverified: Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. No new verdict, split or independence certification is made; added verdict units are 0 and the final independence count is not recorded.
Reason for missing information: No new verdict, split or independence certification is made; added verdict units are 0 and the final independence count is not recorded.
Required materials and conditions: Separate records of original candidate history, production and review
Materials to obtain first: No new verdict, split or independence certification is made; added verdict units are 0 and the final independence count is not recorded.
Further research: Proposal: Reflect only user-provided materials or decisions as separate events.
Remaining uncertainty: Unread or unverified materials do not mean zero effect, zero events, safety or new clinical certification.
Conditions for verification: Separate records of original candidate history, production and review
Why this condition is needed: An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question
Application exceptions: Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.
Referenced methods: Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation

Related sources R01 R02 R03 R04