{
  "schema_version": "chamgap-public-criteria-1.0",
  "title": "Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation: distinguishing specific vocational advice and delivery systems — an evidence checklist",
  "language": "en",
  "translation_date": "2026-10-11",
  "criteria_version": "1.0",
  "criteria_date": "2026-10-06",
  "condition_origin": "Chamgap's own application conditions",
  "method_sources": [
    {
      "id": "M03",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-03",
      "section": "§3.1, §3.2.1–3.2.3, MECIR C5/C7/C13",
      "official_principle": "Clearly record the question, eligibility conditions and reasons for changes, and distinguish variations in interventions.",
      "review_level": "Preserved methodology connections were reused for preparation. No new review of methodological content, reassessment or external-link checks were performed."
    },
    {
      "id": "M04",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5.1 (2025), chapter updated 2025-03",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-04",
      "section": "§4.5, §4.6.1–4.6.3, MECIR C42",
      "official_principle": "Distinguish studies from reports and link them; do not omit a study solely because results are unreported.",
      "review_level": "Preserved methodology connections were reused for preparation. No new review of methodological content, reassessment or external-link checks were performed."
    },
    {
      "id": "M08",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-08",
      "section": "§8.1–8.2.3, Table 8.2.a",
      "official_principle": "Define the outcome and effect of interest, then examine randomization, deviations, missing data, measurement and selective reporting.",
      "review_level": "Preserved methodology connections were reused for preparation. No new review of methodological content, reassessment or external-link checks were performed."
    },
    {
      "id": "M15",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-15",
      "section": "§15.2.4, §15.3.1–15.3.3",
      "official_principle": "Distinguish effect estimates, intervals, importance and applicability. Sample size alone does not determine precision.",
      "review_level": "Preserved methodology connections were reused for preparation. No new review of methodological content, reassessment or external-link checks were performed."
    },
    {
      "id": "M19",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-19",
      "section": "§19.1.2, §19.2.1–19.2.4",
      "official_principle": "Harm questions may require different designs, populations and follow-up from efficacy questions. Case reports do not establish incidence rates.",
      "review_level": "Preserved methodology connections were reused for preparation. No new review of methodological content, reassessment or external-link checks were performed."
    }
  ],
  "status_dictionary": {
    "Partly verified": "Some information exists in the preserved review summary; detailed original materials remain unverified. This does not certify a passed review or clinical efficacy.",
    "Unverified": "Detailed materials for the selected condition could not be established within the stored scope; this does not mean zero effect, zero studies or safety",
    "Review incomplete": "Review of existing content incomplete",
    "Met": "Use only within the relevant conditions after existing content review; no automatic designation in this preparation",
    "Not reported": "Distinguish only within materials actually read; do not turn unread external materials into unreported findings",
    "Inaccessible": "Not applied during this preparation because actual access was not tested",
    "Not applicable": "Use with a reason for non-applicability based on an explicit question boundary",
    "Conflicting data": "Judge after actual material comparison; review was not performed during this preparation",
    "Insufficient evidence for the conditions": "Do not use as a clinical grade encompassing currently unread materials"
  },
  "requirements": [
    {
      "item_id": "N01",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy",
      "question": "Are the general vocational-rehabilitation verdict and the specific SWAP parent verdict distinguished?",
      "needed": "Separate records of the subclaim, grade and note and the parent verdict",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question",
      "application_exception": "Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.",
      "criterion": "Separate records of the subclaim, grade and note and the parent verdict",
      "basis": "Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation",
      "condition_origin": "Question-specific application conditions; existing content review remains incomplete and common definitions are not automatically fulfilled",
      "proposed_research": "If additional material is provided, link direct evidence for each population, program and outcome."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N02",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy",
      "question": "Are SWAP workers with musculoskeletal pain and other vocational-rehabilitation populations the same?",
      "needed": "Original materials on occupation, baseline work status, condition, eligibility and denominators",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question",
      "application_exception": "Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.",
      "criterion": "Original materials on occupation, baseline work status, condition, eligibility and denominators",
      "basis": "Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation",
      "condition_origin": "Question-specific application conditions; existing content review remains incomplete and common definitions are not automatically fulfilled",
      "proposed_research": "Obtain original eligibility, baseline characteristics, work and absence status and direct comparisons for each population."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N03",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy",
      "question": "What program was early stepped physiotherapist vocational advice and case management?",
      "needed": "Study records of providers, services, support, accompanying management and actual exposure",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question",
      "application_exception": "Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.",
      "criterion": "Study records of providers, services, support, accompanying management and actual exposure",
      "basis": "Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation",
      "condition_origin": "Question-specific application conditions; existing content review remains incomplete and common definitions are not automatically fulfilled",
      "proposed_research": "Obtain original service components, providers, start time, actual exposure and accompanying management materials."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N04",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy",
      "question": "What were SWAP control management and the comparator for the generalization question?",
      "needed": "Original group records of usual management, contact, additional support and existing treatment",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question",
      "application_exception": "Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.",
      "criterion": "Original group records of usual management, contact, additional support and existing treatment",
      "basis": "Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation",
      "condition_origin": "Question-specific application conditions; existing content review remains incomplete and common definitions are not automatically fulfilled",
      "proposed_research": "Obtain original control and accompanying management, contact differences and direct comparisons for the generalization question."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N05",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy",
      "question": "Are cluster allocation across 6 practices and the denominator of 338 participants distinguished?",
      "needed": "Original materials on clusters, individuals, allocation and analysis denominators, cluster sizes and adjustment",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question",
      "application_exception": "Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.",
      "criterion": "Original materials on clusters, individuals, allocation and analysis denominators, cluster sizes and adjustment",
      "basis": "Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation",
      "condition_origin": "Question-specific application conditions; existing content review remains incomplete and common definitions are not automatically fulfilled",
      "proposed_research": "Obtain original cluster allocation, sizes, analysis adjustment and participant flow materials."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N06",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy",
      "question": "Are four-month self-reported absence days the same outcome for all vocational rehabilitation?",
      "needed": "Absence definitions, recall period, questionnaire, denominators and analysis units",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question",
      "application_exception": "Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.",
      "criterion": "Absence definitions, recall period, questionnaire, denominators and analysis units",
      "basis": "Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation",
      "condition_origin": "Question-specific application conditions; existing content review remains incomplete and common definitions are not automatically fulfilled",
      "proposed_research": "Obtain original absence definitions, time points, questionnaire and denominators separately from direct material for other outcomes."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N07",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy",
      "question": "Are mean absence days, mean difference and IRR different effect measures?",
      "needed": "Original group means, between-group mean difference, incidence rate ratio, CI and tests",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question",
      "application_exception": "Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.",
      "criterion": "Original group means, between-group mean difference, incidence rate ratio, CI and tests",
      "basis": "Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation",
      "condition_origin": "Question-specific application conditions; existing content review remains incomplete and common definitions are not automatically fulfilled",
      "proposed_research": "Obtain the original absence-analysis model, cluster adjustment and separate estimation tables for mean difference and IRR."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N08",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy",
      "question": "Are borderline statistical results distinguished from certification of universal benefit?",
      "needed": "Original effects, precision, prespecified plans and scope of application",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question",
      "application_exception": "Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.",
      "criterion": "Original effects, precision, prespecified plans and scope of application",
      "basis": "Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation",
      "condition_origin": "Question-specific application conditions; existing content review remains incomplete and common definitions are not automatically fulfilled",
      "proposed_research": "Link populations, periods, effects, CI and scope of application for new direct comparisons separately."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N09",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy",
      "question": "Do gaps remain in four-month response, attrition and analysis populations?",
      "needed": "Original group questionnaire returns, missingness, analysis populations and sensitivity analyses",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question",
      "application_exception": "Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.",
      "criterion": "Original group questionnaire returns, missingness, analysis populations and sensitivity analyses",
      "basis": "Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation",
      "condition_origin": "Question-specific application conditions; existing content review remains incomplete and common definitions are not automatically fulfilled",
      "proposed_research": "Obtain original questionnaire returns, group reasons for missingness, analysis populations and sensitivity-analysis materials."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N10",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy",
      "question": "Are allocation concealment, blinding and self-report measurement procedures directly described?",
      "needed": "Cluster allocation, concealment, measurement and analysis procedures and original methods",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question",
      "application_exception": "Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.",
      "criterion": "Cluster allocation, concealment, measurement and analysis procedures and original methods",
      "basis": "Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation",
      "condition_origin": "Question-specific application conditions; existing content review remains incomplete and common definitions are not automatically fulfilled",
      "proposed_research": "Obtain original trial methods and measurement and analysis procedures."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N11",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy",
      "question": "What were the prespecified primary endpoint, registration and success threshold?",
      "needed": "Original registration, protocol, SAP, primary hierarchy and clinical-importance materials",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question",
      "application_exception": "Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.",
      "criterion": "Original registration, protocol, SAP, primary hierarchy and clinical-importance materials",
      "basis": "Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation",
      "condition_origin": "Question-specific application conditions; existing content review remains incomplete and common definitions are not automatically fulfilled",
      "proposed_research": "Link original registration, SAP, changes and importance plans separately."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N12",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy",
      "question": "Are net societal benefit, absence costs and healthcare costs distinguished from generalized cost-effectiveness?",
      "needed": "Original setting, currency, perspective, period, costs and uncertainty materials",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question",
      "application_exception": "Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.",
      "criterion": "Original setting, currency, perspective, period, costs and uncertainty materials",
      "basis": "Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation",
      "condition_origin": "Question-specific application conditions; existing content review remains incomplete and common definitions are not automatically fulfilled",
      "proposed_research": "Obtain the original economic analysis period, perspective, cost components and uncertainty and materials from other systems."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N13",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy",
      "question": "Can pain, quality of life and other secondary outcomes replace absence effects?",
      "needed": "Outcome-specific definitions, hierarchy, denominators, effects and intervals",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question",
      "application_exception": "Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.",
      "criterion": "Outcome-specific definitions, hierarchy, denominators, effects and intervals",
      "basis": "Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation",
      "condition_origin": "Question-specific application conditions; existing content review remains incomplete and common definitions are not automatically fulfilled",
      "proposed_research": "Obtain secondary-outcome tables and prespecified hierarchy and multiplicity plans for each endpoint."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N14",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy",
      "question": "Are SWAP's 12-month follow-up and MI-NAV's 12-month results the same?",
      "needed": "Trial-specific follow-up periods, time points, effects and denominators",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question",
      "application_exception": "Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.",
      "criterion": "Trial-specific follow-up periods, time points, effects and denominators",
      "basis": "Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation",
      "condition_origin": "Question-specific application conditions; existing content review remains incomplete and common definitions are not automatically fulfilled",
      "proposed_research": "Link original SWAP results at each time point and MI-NAV materials by trial."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N15",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy",
      "question": "What were MI-NAV populations, NAV delivery and the three intervention comparisons?",
      "needed": "Distinguish original populations, delivery systems, motivational interviewing, stratified advice and usual management",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question",
      "application_exception": "Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.",
      "criterion": "Distinguish original populations, delivery systems, motivational interviewing, stratified advice and usual management",
      "basis": "Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation",
      "condition_origin": "Question-specific application conditions; existing content review remains incomplete and common definitions are not automatically fulfilled",
      "proposed_research": "Obtain original MI-NAV eligibility, service components, group comparisons and delivery-system materials."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N16",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy",
      "question": "Which intervention and outcome does MI-NAV's six-month null result concern?",
      "needed": "Time-point-specific interventions, denominators, effects, CI and tests",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question",
      "application_exception": "Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.",
      "criterion": "Time-point-specific interventions, denominators, effects, CI and tests",
      "basis": "Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation",
      "condition_origin": "Question-specific application conditions; existing content review remains incomplete and common definitions are not automatically fulfilled",
      "proposed_research": "Obtain original six-month effects, denominators, models, CI and test materials."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N17",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy",
      "question": "Are MI-NAV's two 12-month effects and denominator preserved separately?",
      "needed": "Time-point- and group-specific original effects, CI, denominators and analysis plans",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question",
      "application_exception": "Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.",
      "criterion": "Time-point- and group-specific original effects, CI, denominators and analysis plans",
      "basis": "Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation",
      "condition_origin": "Question-specific application conditions; existing content review remains incomplete and common definitions are not automatically fulfilled",
      "proposed_research": "Obtain 12-month group denominators, missingness, original models and direct intervention-comparison plans."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N18",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy",
      "question": "Are MI-NAV time-point reports and overlapping SWAP authors independent replication?",
      "needed": "Link reports, trials, time points, populations and author and funding relationships",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question",
      "application_exception": "Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.",
      "criterion": "Link reports, trials, time points, populations and author and funding relationships",
      "basis": "Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation",
      "condition_origin": "Question-specific application conditions; existing content review remains incomplete and common definitions are not automatically fulfilled",
      "proposed_research": "Preserve original same-trial, time-point and participant mapping and funding and author connections."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N19",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy",
      "question": "Do direct gaps remain by population, service and system for vocational rehabilitation in general?",
      "needed": "Direct comparisons for different populations, programs, delivery systems and outcomes",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question",
      "application_exception": "Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.",
      "criterion": "Direct comparisons for different populations, programs, delivery systems and outcomes",
      "basis": "Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation",
      "condition_origin": "Question-specific application conditions; existing content review remains incomplete and common definitions are not automatically fulfilled",
      "proposed_research": "Direct comparative evidence with clearly specified population, system, service, period and outcome is needed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N20",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy",
      "question": "Are SWAP public and nonprofit funding and four involvement gaps distinguished?",
      "needed": "Records of funding, free provision, affiliated authors and external analysis roles",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question",
      "application_exception": "Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.",
      "criterion": "Records of funding, free provision, affiliated authors and external analysis roles",
      "basis": "Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation",
      "condition_origin": "Question-specific application conditions; existing content review remains incomplete and common definitions are not automatically fulfilled",
      "proposed_research": "Obtain separate funding, provision, affiliation, analysis, design and manuscript disclosures."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N21",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy",
      "question": "Are MI-NAV funding labels distinguished from service delivery systems?",
      "needed": "Separate materials on delivery, support, affiliation, analysis and author relationships",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question",
      "application_exception": "Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.",
      "criterion": "Separate materials on delivery, support, affiliation, analysis and author relationships",
      "basis": "Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation",
      "condition_origin": "Question-specific application conditions; existing content review remains incomplete and common definitions are not automatically fulfilled",
      "proposed_research": "Obtain separate original support, delivery, affiliation and research-role disclosures."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N22",
      "question_type": "Supplementary harm evidence",
      "question": "What is the scope of serious adverse events not assessed and harm signals not reported?",
      "needed": "Prespecified harms plans, collection, group events, exposure and denominators",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question",
      "application_exception": "Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.",
      "criterion": "Prespecified harms plans, collection, group events, exposure and denominators",
      "basis": "Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation",
      "condition_origin": "Question-specific application conditions; existing content review remains incomplete and common definitions are not automatically fulfilled",
      "proposed_research": "Obtain trial-specific original harms plans, group events, denominators, exposure and discontinuation materials."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N23",
      "question_type": "Supplementary harm evidence",
      "question": "Do direct gaps remain in long-term and rare harms and service discontinuation?",
      "needed": "Time-point-specific exposure, discontinuation, severity, direct harms and follow-up",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question",
      "application_exception": "Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.",
      "criterion": "Time-point-specific exposure, discontinuation, severity, direct harms and follow-up",
      "basis": "Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation",
      "condition_origin": "Question-specific application conditions; existing content review remains incomplete and common definitions are not automatically fulfilled",
      "proposed_research": "Actual service-specific exposure, discontinuation, long-term harms and rare-event materials are needed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N24",
      "question_type": "Supplementary harm evidence",
      "question": "Are application to other populations, repeated harm evidence and support instructions distinguished?",
      "needed": "Direct harms and application by population and program and same-population relationships",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question",
      "application_exception": "Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.",
      "criterion": "Direct harms and application by population and program and same-population relationships",
      "basis": "Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation",
      "condition_origin": "Question-specific application conditions; existing content review remains incomplete and common definitions are not automatically fulfilled",
      "proposed_research": "Link direct comparisons and harms materials for new populations by service."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N25",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy",
      "question": "Are registration reports and external access status shown for each material?",
      "needed": "Original links and actual access records for summaries, papers, registration, protocol and SAP",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question",
      "application_exception": "Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.",
      "criterion": "Original links and actual access records for summaries, papers, registration, protocol and SAP",
      "basis": "Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation",
      "condition_origin": "Question-specific application conditions; existing content review remains incomplete and common definitions are not automatically fulfilled",
      "proposed_research": "Link original materials obtained by the user with their actual access status for each material."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N26",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy",
      "question": "Are original dates, subclaim and parent values, Korean and English text, corrections and empty values retained?",
      "needed": "Preservation of the whole parent verdict summary and selected verdict record, languages and history",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question",
      "application_exception": "Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.",
      "criterion": "Preservation of the whole parent verdict summary and selected verdict record, languages and history",
      "basis": "Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation",
      "condition_origin": "Question-specific application conditions; existing content review remains incomplete and common definitions are not automatically fulfilled",
      "proposed_research": "Link new materials and decisions with preservation of the entire original text and separate change events."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N27",
      "question_type": "Comparative efficacy",
      "question": "Are production completion and original-content review and independence certification distinguished?",
      "needed": "Separate records of original candidate history, production and review",
      "role": "Supplementary",
      "role_reason": "An individual production condition recording original values, direct comparisons and application boundaries for the selected question",
      "application_exception": "Unread external materials, different comparisons or out-of-scope results do not substitute for fulfilled conditions, zero effect or safety.",
      "criterion": "Separate records of original candidate history, production and review",
      "basis": "Universal benefit of vocational rehabilitation",
      "condition_origin": "Question-specific application conditions; existing content review remains incomplete and common definitions are not automatically fulfilled",
      "proposed_research": "Proposal: Reflect only user-provided materials or decisions as separate events."
    }
  ]
}