CHAMGAP
VERIFIEDPassed the Codex final verification and publication gate. Evidence-verification cutoff: 2026-09-07. AI was used for research and drafting; the existence of all 1 cited sources was verified at the original page, followed by blind grading, adversarial audit, and build validation. Methodology v1.0.
Verdict No. 2989 · Search date 2026-09-07 · Methodology v1.0

Pre-exercise ingestion of ice slurry at -1°C and 7.5 g/kg,
does it really help with Longer running time to exhaustion in hot conditions?

30-Second Summary
C
Evidence Grade C · 54 · Safety caution
Participants ran longer in a small experiment, but terminal core temperature was higher, so this is not heat-illness prevention evidence
Rectal temperature at exhaustion was higher with ice slurry. Longer exercise capacity should not be interpreted as protection from heat injury, and separate hydration, environmental, and symptom precautions still apply.
What the
research shows
Grade C. In a randomized crossover trial of 10 healthy men, pre-exercise ice slurry at -1°C and 7.5 g/kg increased running time to exhaustion from 40.7 to 50.2 minutes versus 4°C water, a 19% increase, P=.001. Every participant lasted longer, but rectal temperature at exhaustion was higher, 39.36°C versus 39.05°C. Longer performance is not evidence of heat-illness prevention.
What the
ads claim
Claims that ice slurry keeps core temperature safely lower or prevents heatstroke conflict with the terminal-temperature result. Core temperature began lower but ended higher.
*

Useful facts when choosing a product

  • The pre-exercise dose was 7.5 g/kg body weight.
  • The comparison was -1°C ice slurry versus 4°C water.
  • During-exercise repeated dosing was not tested in this trial.
ID

Chamgap Semantic Classification Code

Permanent code issued

F.ice-slurry.oral.running-time-to-exhaustion.increase.cold-water

Foods and beverages > Pre-exercise ingestion of ice slurry at -1°C and 7.5 g/kg > Oral > Longer running time to exhaustion in hot conditions > Increase claim > Cold water

Codex retrospectively verified the principal intervention, delivery, population, endpoint, and comparator from the existing reviewed verdict and issued a permanent semantic code. Secondary outcomes on the page are not transferred as separate claims. The code identifies the intervention and claim; it never contains the evidence grade, score, or safety result.

Download semantic index (JSON) · Codebook v1

⌘

Exact Claim Classification

These independent facets prevent evidence from different forms, routes, populations, effects, and comparators from being mixed.

Intervention classF · Food, ingredient, or beverage
Canonical ingredient or interventionPre-exercise ingestion of ice slurry at -1°C and 7.5 g/kg
Source or part usedFood or beverage specified in the verdict; unreported cultivar and origin remain unverified
Formulation or processingPre-exercise ingestion of ice slurry at -1°C and 7.5 g/kg
RouteOral
DosePre-exercise ingestion of ice slurry at -1°C and 7.5 g/kg
DurationSingle pre-exercise intake
Population10 healthy men, two single-session conditions
Effect or conditionLonger running time to exhaustion in hot conditions
Primary endpointTime to exhaustion and thermoregulatory measures while running at first ventilatory threshold in heat
ComparatorCold water
Duplicate-detection keyice-slurry|oral|10 healthy men, two single-session conditions|running-time-to-exhaustion|Single pre-exercise intake
Gap Measurement · Verdict 2989 · C 54
What advertising claims
What independent, higher-quality research supports
△ GAP
01

What the research actually shows

Ten men ingested -1°C ice slurry or 4°C cold water at 7.5 g/kg in counterbalanced order before running at first ventilatory threshold in 34.0°C and 54.9% relative humidity. Time was 50.2 versus 40.7 minutes; rectal temperature was 0.32°C lower before running but 0.31°C higher at exhaustion.

02

Why this is classified as C (54)

A roughly 19% large within-person performance effect is offset by n=10, one acute laboratory test, and absence of clinical heat-illness safety testing, giving C with 54 points.

Counterpoint. Rapid ingestion of a large cold volume can cause gastrointestinal discomfort, and the ability to exercise longer does not mean lower heat-injury risk.

Rejudgment record. Codex PubMed original-trial, DOI, and effect-size cross-check — Accepted the large within-person time-to-exhaustion effect from PMID 19952832 while accounting for a functional surrogate, n=10, single acute test, and absence of heat-illness safety testing

Stored scoring profile
EndpointSSurrogate marker - laboratory or imaging measures
ReplicationR1Single confirmatory trial
IndependenceI2Decisive evidence is publicly or non-profit funded
Effect sizeE+Meets the clinically important threshold

Stored derived and displayed grades match; this is not a current recalculation or validity check (C).

▦

Sub-claim grades by effect

This ingredient is marketed for several effects. A single overall grade blends strong and weak claims together, so each effect is graded separately here. The overall grade reflects the strongest disconfirming or core claim.

Effect (sub-claim)GradeBasis
Longer running time to exhaustion in heatCA large acute signal of 50.2 versus 40.7 minutes.
Prevention of heat illness?Heat-illness events were not measured and terminal temperature was higher.
✓

Cross-check — AI research and Codex final gate

AI was used for research and drafting. Blind grading, adversarial audit, and the methodology boundary rules were then reapplied before Codex performed the final evidence, grade, copy, and build checks. If a grade cannot be narrowed, both evidence positions and their reasons are published.
03

Evidence Table

StudyDesignSampleFundingEndpointResultWeight
Siegel R et al. 2010Randomized counterbalanced within-person crossover heat-exercise trial10 healthy men, two single-session conditionsUniversity investigators; no commercial manufacturer involvement identified in the PubMed recordTime to exhaustion and thermoregulatory measures while running at first ventilatory threshold in heat50.2±8.5 vs 40.7±7.2 minutes, +19±6%, P=.001; terminal rectal temperature 39.36 vs 39.05°C, P=.001Large acute performance signal from a tiny laboratory trial
§

Receipt — 1 References

All 1 cited sources were verified for existence at the original page (as of 2026-09-07).

Siegel R, Maté J, Brearley MB, Watson G, Nosaka K, Laursen PB. Ice slurry ingestion increases core temperature capacity and running time in the heat. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(4):717-725. PMID: 19952832. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181bf257a.
checked
Research and draft: AI used · Cross-check: blind grading and adversarial audit
Final verification and publication gate: Codex · Evidence date: 2026-09-07 · Corrections: none
↗

Cite this verdict

Ice-Slurry Precooling for Running Time to Exhaustion in the Heat Evidence Grade C card
[Chamgap] Ice-Slurry Precooling for Running Time to Exhaustion in the Heat — Evidence Grade C·54. 1 cited sources checked. Source: https://chamgap.com/en/verdicts/sports/ice-slurry-precooling-running-time-heat/ · CC BY 4.0

CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution; do not distort grades, numbers, or verdict meaning.

!

What this document does and does not do

Chamgap is an information source. It reports what research has and has not confirmed; it does not tell readers what to take or buy. That decision belongs to readers and, when needed, medical or legal professionals. This verdict reflects literature available up to the search date and may change as new research appears. Nothing here is medical advice.
↑