| 1 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N01 · Evidence conditionWhich migraine-attack frequency question is covered?Required |
The original claim is reduction of migraine-attack frequency without aura, distinguished from other formulations, biomarkers and combinations. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
An 8-week phytosomal-curcumin add-on comparison for migraine without aura |
Material needed: Direct original paper, protocol and registration. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 2 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N02 · Evidence conditionWhich adults with migraine are represented?Required |
The retained population is adults with migraine without aura who continued standard treatment. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
Diagnosis of migraine without aura, adult eligibility and continuation of standard treatment |
Material needed: Eligibility, diagnosis and baseline-characteristic tables. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 3 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N03 · Evidence conditionIs the phytosomal formulation interchangeable with other curcumin?Required |
The selected formulation is phospholipid phytosomal curcumin derived from Curcuma longa, distinguished from nanocurcumin. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
Distinction between a phospholipid delivery system and conventional, nano, micellar and combination formulations |
Material needed: Formulation, product, batch and quantification material. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 4 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N04 · Evidence conditionWhat were the dose and actual intake?Required |
The retained dose is an oral add-on at 250 mg/day. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
Phytosomal curcumin 250 mg/day and actual adherence |
Material needed: Product amount, ingredient amount and adherence records. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 5 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N05 · Evidence conditionWhat were the treatment and follow-up times?Required |
The retained treatment and follow-up duration is 8 weeks. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
Treatment/follow-up over 8 weeks and persistence after stopping |
Material needed: Measurement schedule and follow-up plan. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 6 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N06 · Evidence conditionWhat was the contribution of standard treatment and concurrent medication?Required |
The original record describes an add-on trial with continued standard treatment. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
Continuation/changes in standard treatment, preventive medication and rescue medication in both groups |
Material needed: Concurrent, preventive and rescue medication tables. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 7 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N07 · Evidence conditionWhat was the maltodextrin-placebo comparison?Required |
The comparator is recorded as maltodextrin placebo added to standard treatment. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
Conditions of maltodextrin placebo added to standard treatment |
Material needed: Placebo and concurrent-treatment specifications. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 8 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N08 · Evidence conditionHow is the direct report identified?Required |
The bibliography records Shojaei 2025, PMID 41136816 and DOI 10.1007/s11655-025-3939-1. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
Shojaei report title, PMID, DOI and retained result |
Material needed: Direct original paper and bibliographic record. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 9 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N09 · Evidence conditionIs an IRCT number the same as actual registration verification?Required |
The bibliography contains IRCT20201129049534N2, while registration status in the original record remains unverified. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
IRCT20201129049534N2, registration timing, endpoints and history |
Material needed: Original registration and change history. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 10 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N10 · Evidence conditionWas attack frequency the single prespecified primary endpoint (1st in the hierarchy)?Required |
The retained record leaves unverified whether change in attack frequency at 8 weeks was the single prespecified primary endpoint (1st in the hierarchy). |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
Prespecified hierarchy, analysis and timing for frequency among multiple clinical endpoints |
Material needed: Protocol, SAP and registered endpoints. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 11 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N11 · Evidence conditionWhat were the randomization and concealment methods?Required |
The retained design is a randomized double-blind placebo-add-on trial. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
Randomization procedures, concealment and recruitment flow |
Material needed: Allocation methods and participant flow diagram. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 12 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N12 · Evidence conditionHow were blinding and outcome measurement maintained?Required |
The original record describes a double-blind design. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
Participant/assessor blinding and placebo matching |
Material needed: Blinding, placebo and outcome-recording methods. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 13 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N13 · Evidence conditionHow are 70 randomized participants and 65 completers distinguished?Required |
The retained denominators are 70 randomized and 65 completed (33 versus 32); allocation and completion are not interchanged. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
The 70 randomized participants, 65 completers and group correspondence for 33 versus 32 |
Material needed: Group-specific allocation, completion and analysis flow and result tables. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 14 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N14 · Evidence conditionWhat was the exact ITT analysis population?Required |
The current summary states that the exact ITT denominator remains unverified. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
ITT, completer analyses and inclusion criteria for the frequency result |
Material needed: Analysis-population definitions, ITT, SAP and result tables. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 15 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N15 · Evidence conditionWhat effects could missingness and withdrawal have?Required |
The retained material distinguishes randomized and completed participant counts. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
Group-specific withdrawal reasons, missing-data handling and sensitivity analyses |
Material needed: Missing-data and withdrawal reasons and analysis material. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 16 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N16 · Evidence conditionIn which units was attack frequency measured?Required |
The selected endpoint is change in attack frequency at 8 weeks. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
Attack definition, frequency per period, diaries and baseline values |
Material needed: Frequency definition, diaries, baseline values and result tables. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 17 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N17 · Evidence conditionWhat was the exact between-group effect on frequency?Required |
The existing summary of broadly positive abstract results, including frequency, is retained. The exact frequency-specific between-group change remains unverified. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
Frequency-specific between-group change and analysis model |
Material needed: Original frequency-specific group values and between-group estimate tables. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 18 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N18 · Evidence conditionIs there a confidence interval for the frequency effect?Required |
The retained record leaves the 95% CI unverified. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
Exact frequency-specific between-group 95% CI |
Material needed: Between-group 95% CI and analysis output. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 19 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N19 · Evidence conditionWhat was the P value in the direct phytosomal trial?Required |
The exact frequency-specific P value in the phytosomal trial remains unverified. P=.052 is not transferred here. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
Exact frequency-specific between-group P value, distinguished from values in another trial |
Material needed: Frequency-specific analysis tables and SAP. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 20 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N20 · Evidence conditionAre other clinical endpoints distinguished from frequency?Required |
The original record states that multiple outcomes were measured. A broad positive statement is not reconstructed as an exact frequency-specific effect. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
Separate results for frequency, duration, intensity, quality of life and sleep |
Material needed: Prespecified plans and result tables for all endpoints. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 21 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N21 · Evidence conditionWas the change in attack count important to patients?Required |
The retained material records a positive frequency signal, but the exact effect remains unverified. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
Minimum important difference, responders, medication use and patient-important outcomes |
Material needed: Responder, important-difference and patient-outcome material. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 22 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N22 · Evidence conditionIs the conventional-curcumin trial in 44 people the same intervention?Required |
The separate report concerns conventional curcumin in 44 women. Retained results are between-group P=.052 and within-group P=.014. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
A trial in 44 women using conventional curcumin 500 mg, 2 times per 1 day, over 8 weeks |
Material needed: Separate original paper, result tables and intervention specifications. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 23 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N23 · Evidence conditionWhat differences separate the trials?Required |
The reports differ in formulation, dose and population wording. They are not combined as the same effect or a common denominator. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
Distinction between a phospholipid formulation at 250 mg/day and conventional curcumin 500 mg, 2 times per 1 day |
Material needed: Trial-specific intervention, population and analysis specifications. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 24 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N24 · Evidence conditionAre mechanistic, omega-3 and CoQ10 reports counted as clinical replication?Required |
The original record states that CGRP/inflammatory-marker and omega-3/CoQ10 combination trials were excluded from independent clinical-frequency replication. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
Directness of mechanistic markers and combination trials |
Material needed: Related-report lists, cohorts, interventions and endpoint material. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 25 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N25 · Evidence conditionHow far are unique trials and independent replications established?Required |
The direct formulation-specific report is separated from the boundary report of another formulation. The counts of 70 and 44 participants and 65 completers are not added. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
Report-trial-endpoint relationships and independence |
Material needed: Report-trial mapping and specifications of replication-study interventions. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 26 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N26 · Evidence conditionWhat information is retained on research funding?Required |
The direct report is retained as declaring no conflicts with funding details unverified; the separate report is retained as academic-institution research with funding details unverified. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
Funding for the direct trial and the separate academic-institution trial |
Material needed: Original funding and institutional-role statements. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 27 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N27 · Evidence conditionAre product supply and manufacturer involvement known?Required |
The retained direct report says product-supply details remain unverified. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
Free product support, manufacturer, batches and institutional roles |
Material needed: Product-supply and manufacturer-role material. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 28 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N28 · Evidence conditionDoes no-conflict wording answer employee-authorship and support questions?Required |
The direct report wording that authors declared no conflicts is retained. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
Distinction among COI declarations, affiliations, employee authors and individual support |
Material needed: Original COI, affiliation and support statements. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 29 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N29 · Evidence conditionDoes no reported adverse reaction establish safety?Supplementary |
The original record says no adverse effects were reported in the trial. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
Adverse-event definitions, collection, group-specific events and exposure denominators |
Material needed: Adverse-event collection methods and group-specific tables. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 30 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N30 · Evidence conditionAre harms beyond 8 weeks and concurrent-treatment risks answered?Supplementary |
The original record limits interpretation: 65 people over 8 weeks cannot exclude rare harms or long-term add-on safety concerns. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
Follow-up of long-term/rare harms, concurrent medication and vulnerable groups |
Material needed: Long-term follow-up, concurrent-medication and harm-denominator material. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 31 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N31 · Evidence conditionCan findings be extended to replacing preventive medication or other products?Required |
The original record limits preventive-medication replacement claims and claims of the same effect for conventional turmeric, nano formulations or combinations. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
Distinction between add-on and replacement treatment and conventional turmeric, nano formulations and combinations |
Material needed: Direct comparisons for replacement treatment and other formulations. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 32 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N32 · Evidence conditionWhat are the current English wording and historical language correction?Required |
The current English wording separates P=.052 for another formulation from unverified values in the direct trial. The correction history for 2 English fields is retained. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
Retained Korean/English wording, generic English text and the correction event of 2026-09-14 |
Material needed: Original wording before/after correction and language-mapping material. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 33 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N33 · Evidence conditionHow are the original C score of 50, axes and historical verification retained?Required |
The C score of 50, original axes and previous independent cross-check are existing records. They are not inherited as fulfilled conditions or completed content review for this table. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
Historical preservation of the current original grade, score, EX/CX, axes and previous cross-check |
Material needed: Additional review comments and future correction material. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 34 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N34 · Evidence conditionWhat dates, unrecorded information and actual reading scope are retained?Required |
Preparation read the complete stored summary. The original verdict date is 2026-09-08 and the correction date is 2026-09-14. Empty lists of additional detailed claims and deliberation records are also preserved. |
Information in stored summaries is linked to gaps in detailed material. External original-source comparison and content review remain incomplete; effects, safety, prespecification, independence or fulfilled conditions are not certified. |
Original verdict date, correction date, empty detailed-claim list and external material unread |
Material needed: Required originals and planning material when provided. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |