| 1 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N01 · Evidence conditionWhich combination and rhinitis outcome does this sheet address?Required |
The selected claim is relief of TNSS in adult seasonal allergic rhinitis. The original population is adult men and the question concerns the combination product rather than Nigella alone. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Standardized Nigella oil and piperine, men with seasonal rhinitis,15-day TNSS and placebo |
Material needed: Trial question, eligibility, intervention and TNSS definition This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 2 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N02 · Evidence conditionWhat intervention combines Nigellin Amber and BioPerine?Required |
The original record is a combination capsule of supercritical Nigellin Amber(5% thymoquinone) and BioPerine 2.5 mg. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Supercritical seed fixed oil,5% thymoquinone and 2.5 mg piperine combination |
Material needed: Product composition, extraction, standardization and batch analysis This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 3 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N03 · Evidence conditionWhat quality evidence supports 5% thymoquinone standardization?Required |
The original formulation records 5% thymoquinone-standardized seed oil and BioPerine. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Seed-oil standardization, measurement, quality, piperine content and product preservation |
Material needed: Standardization, composition analysis, batch quality and stability material This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 4 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N04 · Evidence conditionHow were 250 mg oil+2.5 mg piperine used 2 times daily?Required |
The original dose record is 250 mg seed oil and 2.5 mg piperine 2 times daily. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Constituents per 1 dose, frequency, use, adherence and actual exposure |
Material needed: Product contents, dosing procedures and use diaries This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 5 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N05 · Evidence conditionCan the combination result establish a Nigella-oil-only effect?Required |
The original explanation that both constituents were administered together and Nigella oil's isolated contribution was not separated is retained. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Nigella-only and piperine-only arms, combination arm, factorial design and isolated contribution |
Material needed: Direct studies with constituent-specific arms and composition tables This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 6 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N06 · Evidence conditionDo other Nigella products answer the same question?Required |
The original route is oral. Existing wording distinguishes formulations rather than treating them as interchangeable. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Seed powder, fixed oil, aqueous extracts, topical products, purified constituents, combinations and oral route |
Material needed: Direct rhinitis studies for the exact formulation and route This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 7 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N07 · Evidence conditionHow far do adult-male results apply?Required |
The original population is adult men with seasonal rhinitis, with all participants described as male. Results are not extended to women, children, single constituents or long-term prevention. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Adult men, seasonal-rhinitis eligibility, and distinctions from women, children and other populations |
Material needed: Eligibility, baseline characteristics and population-specific direct material This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 8 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N08 · Evidence conditionHow were seasonal rhinitis and severity diagnosed?Required |
The original population has seasonal allergic rhinitis and the stored result includes starting TNSS 8.45 versus 7.69. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Diagnosis, allergens, baseline TNSS, duration, eligibility and baseline medicines |
Material needed: Diagnosis, eligibility, allergens and baseline-characteristics tables This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 9 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N09 · Evidence conditionHow did seasonal and allergen exposure compare over 15 days?Required |
The stored account describes a 15-day seasonal-rhinitis trial. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Actual season, region, pollen, environment, exposure differences and concurrent changes |
Material needed: Trial dates, region, environment, exposure and common-management records This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 10 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N10 · Evidence conditionWhat placebo and common management were compared?Required |
The original description of a fixed standardized seed-oil/piperine combination compared with matched-appearance placebo is retained. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Placebo composition/appearance, common treatment and product distinguishability |
Material needed: Placebo composition, product appearance and common-treatment tables This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 11 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N11 · Evidence conditionWhat concurrent effects might rhinitis medicines, rescue treatment and avoidance have?Required |
The original explanation distinguishes 15-day TNSS from medication sparing. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Concomitant medicines, washout, rescue antihistamines, other medicines, avoidance and arm-specific use |
Material needed: Concomitant/rescue-medication plans, arm-specific use and avoidance material This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 12 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N12 · Evidence conditionWhat are the exact 15-day treatment and follow-up time points?Required |
The original duration is 15 days of treatment/follow-up and the selected endpoint is 15-day TNSS change. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Treatment, visits, starting/final assessments,15-day TNSS and post-discontinuation follow-up |
Material needed: Visits, dosing, symptom-recording schedules and subsequent follow-up This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 13 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N13 · Evidence conditionWhat TNSS scale and measurement methods were used?Required |
The original endpoint is 15-day TNSS change. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Components, range, score direction, recall period, assessors and diaries |
Material needed: TNSS definition, measurement tools, diaries and aggregation procedures This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 14 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N14 · Evidence conditionWhat was the original TNSS and symptom-duration hierarchy?Required |
The evidence summary records TNSS and symptom duration as coprimary outcomes. The selected question is 15-day TNSS change and the existing coprimary separation setting is off. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
TNSS/symptom-duration coprimary wording, plans and success criteria |
Material needed: Registration, protocol, analysis plan, endpoint hierarchy and analysis list This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 15 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N15 · Evidence conditionWhat do 8.45→4.94 versus 7.69→6.66 represent?Required |
The existing result record contains TNSS 8.45→4.94 versus 7.69→6.66. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Arm-specific starting/final TNSS, means, dispersion, timing and denominators |
Material needed: Arm-specific starting/final TNSS, raw values, dispersion and denominators This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 16 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N16 · Evidence conditionHow should −3.52 versus −1.03 points and P<.001 be read?Required |
The existing answer records −3.52 points with the combination and −1.03 with placebo(P<.001); the evidence summary records the same reported changes and P value. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Arm-specific changes, tested comparison, effect of interest and precision |
Material needed: Arm-specific changes, between-group test results, dispersion and models This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 17 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N17 · Evidence conditionWhat is missing about the change CI?Required |
The original result says that the change CI was not reported. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Change/between-group-effect CI, dispersion, denominators and models |
Material needed: Original changes, between-group effects, CI and dispersion tables This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 18 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N18 · Evidence conditionHow were baseline TNSS and other differences considered?Required |
The existing result separately reports starting TNSS 8.45 versus 7.69. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Baseline scores/characteristics, adjustment, regression, between-group analysis and alternatives |
Material needed: Baseline tables, adjustment, analysis plans and sensitivity material This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 19 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N19 · Evidence conditionWhat denominators do 65 people and 33 versus 32 represent?Required |
The evidence summary records 65 people,33 versus 32, all completed and all male. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Allocation, analysis, completion, arm mapping, TNSS, symptom-duration and harm denominators |
Material needed: Participant flow and arm-specific allocation, analysis and endpoint tables This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 20 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N20 · Evidence conditionDoes completion establish complete outcomes and ITT analysis?Required |
The existing account and sample record both state that all participants completed. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Completion, attrition, missing data, ITT, PP, outcome availability and effect of interest |
Material needed: Participant flow, analysis definitions and endpoint/diary missingness tables This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 21 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N21 · Evidence conditionWhat were the allocation sequence, concealment and baseline characteristics?Required |
The original design is a randomized double-blind placebo trial. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Random sequence generation, concealment, allocation and baseline balance |
Material needed: Allocation procedures and baseline tables This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 22 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N22 · Evidence conditionWho was masked and could the products be distinguished?Required |
The original design is double-blind and the comparator is matched-appearance placebo. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Role-specific masking, appearance, sensory properties, maintenance, unmasking and measurement |
Material needed: Masking/placebo procedures and measurement methods This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 23 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N23 · Evidence conditionHow were product use and treatment deviations handled?Required |
The original formulation/dose records a fixed combination 2 times daily for 15 days and describes all participants completing. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Actual use, adherence, discontinuation, crossover, rescue medicines and effect of interest |
Material needed: Use diaries, rescue medicines, deviations and analysis plans This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 24 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N24 · Evidence conditionHow much is verified about CTRI/2022/07/044180?Required |
Stored evidence and the citation include CTRI/2022/07/044180, and the existing account describes a preregistered placebo comparison. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Original-record/citation registration identifiers versus registry contents, dates and actual reading |
Material needed: CTRI text/history, protocol and report mapping This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 25 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N25 · Evidence conditionHow were TNSS/symptom-duration success and multiplicity planned?Required |
The evidence summary records TNSS and symptom duration as coprimary outcomes, while the selected question is TNSS. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Coprimary outcomes, planned analyses, timing, success criteria and adjustment |
Material needed: Analysis plans, planned comparisons and all primary-outcome tables This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 26 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N26 · Evidence conditionWhat remains unknown for the coprimary symptom-duration outcome?Required |
The original endpoint description only identifies symptom duration as coprimary. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Symptom-duration definition, units, timing, arm-specific values, effects and denominators |
Material needed: Symptom-duration definitions, results and denominator tables This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 27 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N27 · Evidence conditionDoes 15-day TNSS establish medication sparing or management across the season?Supplementary; required for claims about long-term management or medication sparing |
The original explanation states that 15-day TNSS differs from long-term seasonal management or medication sparing. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Rescue/regular medicines, seasonal/long-term follow-up, treatment strategies and recurrence |
Material needed: Medication-use outcomes and long-term/seasonal follow-up This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 28 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N28 · Evidence conditionWhat is the scope of the original large-TNSS-change interpretation?Required |
The existing account and grade rationale describe a large short-term between-group contrast. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Effects, CI, prespecified important difference, patient-important outcomes and responders |
Material needed: Importance plans, effect intervals and patient-important outcomes This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 29 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N29 · Evidence conditionWhich report do the stored summary and PMID/PMCID/DOI identify?Required |
The original citation records Majeed M et al., Medicine(Baltimore).2024, PMID 39121267, PMCID PMC11315530, DOI 10.1097/MD.0000000000039243 and a CTRI identifier. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Research reports, same-trial/registration families and original citation |
Material needed: Original papers, registration and subsequent reports from the same trial This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 30 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N30 · Evidence conditionHow do the no-funding statement and company involvement differ?Required |
The existing funding record includes both the authors' no-funding statement and Sami-Sabinsa/Sabinsa employee authorship and product involvement. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Cash funding, product support, employee authorship, COI and company roles |
Material needed: Original funding/COI, affiliations and product/company-role material This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 31 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N31 · Evidence conditionWhat remains unknown about independent replication of the same product?Required |
The account records the company product trial/employee-author limitation and a product-specific short-term signal. The original assessment record is R1/I0. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Product/question matching, teams, support, report families and independent replication |
Material needed: Separate original trials for the same product/question and team/support relationships This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 32 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N32 · Evidence conditionWere the original paper, PMCID text and registration actually read?Required |
The clinical production material actually read was the whole stored summary. The original PubMed address is linked and the PMCID entry retained. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Stored summary, PubMed link, PMCID citation and external content reading |
Material needed: Original material corresponding to the citation and registration This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 33 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N33 · Evidence conditionAre the original evidence date and current production time distinguished?Required |
The existing original-record date is 2026-09-08, the correction date is 2026-09-14 and the citation is from 2024. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Original-record date, correction date,2024 citation, actual reading, searches and production |
Material needed: Original publication, search, receipt and correction records This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 34 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N34 · Evidence conditionWhat is the status of generic English wording and the 1-field correction?Required |
The English answer records 65 men,15 days and −3.52/−1.03/P<.001. English evidence-summary descriptions of denominators, funding, endpoints and results remain generic, while the evidence type specifically identifies product-combination evidence. The correction record describes replacing 1 field. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Korean/English reported values, generic English explanations and before/after correction originals |
Material needed: Before/after correction originals and English correspondence for original results/endpoints This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 35 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N35 · Evidence conditionWhat historical records are C50, I0 and the existing settings?Required |
The original preserves C50, Caution, assessment record B/P/R1/I0/E+/B2/C0, the off coprimary-separation setting and historical independent cross-checking wording. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Original grade, score, safety label, assessment records, grade rationale and empty values |
Material needed: Original verdict and permitted subsequent correction events This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 36 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N36 · Evidence conditionWhat denominators supported collection of actual 15-day combination harms?Required |
The study title mentions efficacy/safety, but the original safety wording cautions that small trials cannot exclude rare or long-term harms. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Event definitions, collection, arm-specific events, denominators, discontinuation, missingness and timing |
Material needed: Adverse-event/discontinuation records, harm collection and arm-specific denominators This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 37 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N37 · Evidence conditionAre harms of the piperine combination and caution-listed medicines verified?Supplementary; required within concomitant-use or combination-harm scope |
The original formulation combines piperine and the safety wording retains caution for glucose, blood-pressure, anticoagulant, antiseizure and immune-modifying medicines. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Combined/isolated exposure, concomitant medicines, interaction events, denominators and contribution |
Material needed: Formulation/medicine-specific exposure, interaction and concomitant-use material This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 38 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N38 · Evidence conditionWhat about safety beyond a short male trial?Supplementary; required for long-term or vulnerable-group safety claims |
The original safety wording records composition differences by formulation/extraction, vulnerable-group/surgical cautions and inability to exclude rare or long-term harms. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Formulation-specific long-term/rare harms, pregnancy, breastfeeding, children, liver/kidney disease and surgery |
Material needed: Long-term, rare, formulation-specific and population-specific original harm material This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 39 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N39 · Evidence conditionWhat are individual event timelines and alternative causes?Required |
The original material records 15-day use and general caution wording. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Onset, recovery, discontinuation, re-exposure, concomitant medicines, underlying illness and alternatives |
Material needed: Event timelines, co-medication, alternatives and original harm material This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 40 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N40 · Evidence conditionWere events with the same combination repeated in independent material?Supplementary; required for repeated-harm claims |
The current stored account records general caution wording and does not present a list of independent cases. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Unique cases, formulation/exposure/event matching, report families and repeated citations |
Material needed: Unique cases, report families and exposure material This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 41 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N41 · Evidence conditionHow are the read summary, unread material and later changes linked?Required |
The stored summary is read for production and external material remains unread with access unattempted. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Material-specific availability/reading, original citation links and condition/evidence-change events |
Material needed: Provided or separately permitted original material and corrections This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |