| 1 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N01 · Evidence conditionWhat is the exact original claim scope?Required |
The selected claim is improved ACT symptom control in adults continuing inhaled asthma therapy. It concerns adjunctive oral seed oil. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Seed oil, adults with asthma on inhaled maintenance therapy,4-week ACT and placebo add-on question |
Material needed: Original material for the same population, formulation, comparison and endpoint This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 2 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N02 · Evidence conditionWhat material was actually read?Required |
The complete stored summary,2 evidence entries,2 citations and Korean/English content were used. External papers, registration, protocols and SAPs remain unread and access unattempted. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Distinguishing stored summaries from external papers, registration and plans |
Material needed: Original material and access history provided by the user or acquired in follow-up work This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 3 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N03 · Evidence conditionWhat identifies the seed-oil report?Required |
Koshak A et al., Phytother Res2017, PMID28093815, DOI10.1002/ptr.5761 and NCT02407262 are preserved. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Title, authors, year, PMID/DOI and registration identity |
Material needed: Complete original citation, registration history and related-report list This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 4 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N04 · Evidence conditionIs the seed-powder report the same oil replication?Required |
This is the powder study by Salem AM et al., Ann Saudi Med2017, PMID28151459, PMCIDPMC6148976, DOI10.5144/0256-4947.2017.64 and ISRCTN48853858. It is not direct seed-oil replication. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Distinguishing powder, dose,12 weeks, registration and study families |
Material needed: Study specifications and registration/report mapping for each formulation This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 5 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N05 · Evidence conditionAre reports, trials and participants kept separate?Required |
The oil trial and different-formulation powder study remain linked to their own reports. 80 and76 people or powder24/26/26 are not newly summed into an oil-efficacy denominator. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Report/family relationships for80-person oil and76-person powder studies |
Material needed: Study-specific participant flow and related-report relationships This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 6 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N06 · Evidence conditionWhich adults with asthma are represented?Required |
Participants are adults with asthma continuing inhaled maintenance therapy. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Asthma diagnosis, severity, baseline control, age and inclusion/exclusion |
Material needed: Population/baseline characteristics and selection tables This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 7 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N07 · Evidence conditionWhich seed oil is represented?Required |
Oral capsules of fixed oil from Nigella sativa L. seeds are selected. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Fixed seed-oil capsules, composition, extraction/manufacture and batch |
Material needed: Product, manufacturing, composition and batch specifications This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 8 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N08 · Evidence conditionWhat were the oil dose and actual use?Required |
The preserved oil dose is500 mg2 times daily. Powder doses of1·2 g/day are not applied to oil. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
500 mg2 times daily, dosing interval, actual amount and adherence |
Material needed: Arm-specific use, adherence and product-composition records This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 9 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N09 · Evidence conditionIs this an effect added to inhaled maintenance therapy?Required |
Oil or placebo was added for4 weeks while inhaled maintenance therapy continued. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Common inhaled medicines, doses, arm-specific changes and adjunctive contribution |
Material needed: Inhaled medicines, changes, rescue treatment and adherence tables This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 10 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N10 · Evidence conditionWhat were the placebo conditions?Required |
The original wording describes matched-appearance placebo added to standard treatment. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Matched appearance, ingredients, administration, common therapy and masking |
Material needed: Placebo specifications and masking/unmasking records This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 11 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N11 · Evidence conditionWhat was the actual allocation process?Required |
The original design is randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled, with80 randomized people. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Random sequence generation, concealment, baseline balance and allocation denominators |
Material needed: Allocation methods, baseline tables and participant flow This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 12 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N12 · Evidence conditionHow are treatment and follow-up periods defined?Required |
The selected endpoint is4-week ACT. The original Korean treatment4 weeks/follow-up4 weeks and English Four weeks of treatment and follow-up wording are retained. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Treatment4 weeks, follow-up4 weeks, assessment schedules and post-discontinuation observation |
Material needed: Visit, dosing, discontinuation and follow-up schedules This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 13 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N13 · Evidence conditionWhat does ACT measure?Required |
The endpoint is patient-reported symptom control on the4-week Asthma Control Test. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Asthma Control Test, scale/direction, respondents, final values/changes and timing |
Material needed: ACT methods, baseline/4-week results and respondent denominators This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 14 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N14 · Evidence conditionWhat are the4-week ACT results?Required |
ACT21.1±2.6 versus19.6±3.7, P=.044 is retained as originally recorded. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Oil/placebo final values, dispersion, denominators and testing |
Material needed: Endpoint-specific result tables, dispersion, adjustment and intervals This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 15 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N15 · Evidence conditionWhat is the clinical importance of the small ACT contrast?Required |
The original account describes a small absolute ACT contrast and a signal with limited robustness after attrition. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Effect/CI, justified important difference and responder criteria |
Material needed: Original effect/CI, important-difference rationale and responder results This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 16 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N16 · Evidence conditionIs the FEV1 result preserved alongside ACT?Required |
FEV1 P=.170 and the original nonsignificant result remain alongside positive ACT. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Separate FEV1 and ACT endpoints, units, denominators and timing |
Material needed: Original FEV1 results, denominators, intervals and plans This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 17 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N17 · Evidence conditionWhat is the prespecified ACT/FEV1 hierarchy?Required |
The selected account’s main endpoint is4-week ACT, with FEV1 kept separate. NCT02407262 appears in the original material. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Registry, protocol and SAP endpoints, timing, analysis and changes |
Material needed: Registration history, protocol, SAP and all endpoints This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 18 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N18 · Evidence conditionWhat are the80-person allocation and post-attrition denominators?Required |
80 randomized people and10 withdrawals per arm are preserved; the account’s25% attrition remains historical wording. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Arm-specific allocation, measurement, completion, ACT/FEV1 and ITT denominators |
Material needed: Arm-specific participant flow and endpoint analysis tables This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 19 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N19 · Evidence conditionHow were missing data handled in the reported ITT?Required |
The original design reports ITT, but there were10 withdrawals per arm. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
ITT definition, imputation/estimation, withdrawal reasons and sensitivity analysis |
Material needed: ITT/missing-data methods, withdrawal reasons and sensitivity results This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 20 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N20 · Evidence conditionWhat are adherence, rescue medicines and treatment deviations?Required |
The description of adjunctive use with common inhaled maintenance therapy is retained. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Oil/placebo adherence, inhaled-therapy changes, rescue medication and exacerbations |
Material needed: Adherence, rescue-medication and treatment-change tables This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 21 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N21 · Evidence conditionWhat do the powder-study results cover?Required |
The single-blind3-arm placebo study records76 randomized people,24/26/26 and ACT improvement at12 weeks in1·2 g/day powder groups. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Powder1/2 g,12-week ACT,3 arms, denominators and plans |
Material needed: Powder-study results, group composition, denominators and plans This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 22 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N22 · Evidence conditionWhat independent replication concerns the same oil?Required |
The account does not count powder as independent oil replication because formulation, dose and duration differ. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Unique families for the same formulation, population, comparison and4-week ACT |
Material needed: Direct same-oil trials and related-report list This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 23 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N23 · Evidence conditionWhat would answer dose and long-term persistence questions?Required |
The selected oil question is500 mg2 times daily and4-week ACT. 12-week powder results are not substituted for long-term oil data. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Direct oil dose, long-term/post-discontinuation outcomes and subgroups |
Material needed: Same-oil dose/follow-up and prespecified-subgroup material This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 24 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N24 · Evidence conditionDoes this establish exacerbation, attack or admission prevention or inhaler replacement?Required |
The account says ACT is not the same as preventing exacerbations/admissions and that inhaler replacement or attack/admission prevention was not tested. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Boundaries between ACT, separate clinical events and replacement treatment |
Material needed: Separate clinical events, periods, denominators and replacement designs This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 25 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N25 · Evidence conditionWhat records the oil-study funding?Required |
UK Medical Research Council grant G106/1249 is preserved. The account’s independent-funding description is a historical verdict record. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Reported funding, sponsor roles and independence level |
Material needed: Original funding and sponsor-role documents This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 26 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N26 · Evidence conditionWhat are powder funding and product support/COI for both reports?Required |
Powder funding has limited verification. General English wording for both reports is preserved in its original form. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Separate original funding, product provision, employee authorship, patent and COI records |
Material needed: Support, manufacture, employment and COI specifications for each report This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 27 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N27 · Evidence conditionHow were adverse events collected?Supplementary |
The original Caution state and statement that small studies cannot exclude rare/long-term harms are retained. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Events, collection, discontinuation and denominators for the same adult oil exposure |
Material needed: Arm-specific event/discontinuation tables and collection methods This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 28 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N28 · Evidence conditionWhat are co-medication, event timing and harm attribution?Supplementary |
Inhaled maintenance therapy is linked to the original product/medication caution wording. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Inhaled medicines, baseline asthma, cointerventions, onset/recovery and alternatives |
Material needed: Cointerventions, event timelines, withdrawal/recovery and alternative-cause material This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 29 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N29 · Evidence conditionWhat are long-term/rare harms and other vulnerable groups?Supplementary |
Original wording on product differences, vulnerable groups, surgery and medicines is preserved. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Direct long-term exposure, pregnancy/breastfeeding, children and liver/kidney material |
Material needed: Long-term/population-specific exposure, harm and interaction material This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 30 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N30 · Evidence conditionWhat is the history of C50, assessment values and past validation?Required |
C50, original assessment values, historical independent cross-checking wording and empty subclaim/deliberation records are preserved. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Original grade, score, assessment values, original states and change history |
Material needed: Separate history of original verdict and change events This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 31 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N31 · Evidence conditionWhat are the boundaries of English wording, corrections and the original evidence date?Required |
The original verdict date2026-09-08,2-field English correction2026-09-14 with C retained, and current specific/general English wording are preserved. This is a production date with user review pending. |
Stored information is linked to gaps in detailed material. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; fulfilled conditions, effects, safety, prespecification and independence are not certified. |
Korean/English wording,2026-09-08,09-14 correction and production-date distinctions |
Material needed: Before/after correction records, additional material and user comments This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |