| 1 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N01 · Evidence conditionWhich symptom question does this evidence check cover?Required |
The existing subquestion is improved dry-eye symptoms over existing care. The original explanation that different within-group P values do not establish direct superiority is retained. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Whether dry-eye symptoms improve more than with existing care and the scope of added benefit |
Material needed: The parent verdict's symptoms and signs are not combined into a single symptom effect; original direct symptom outcomes, controls, denominators and between-group estimates are needed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 2 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N02 · Evidence conditionWhat is the hierarchy of SPEED and other symptom scales?Required |
The supporting trial lists 3-week SPEED, tear film, inflammation and staining as outcomes. The principal trial covered multiple symptoms and signs. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
The main symptom scale, version, time point, baseline and between-group results |
Material needed: SPEED is not duplicated across all symptoms and signs; scales, time points, prespecified plans, all symptom tables and denominators remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 3 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N03 · Evidence conditionWhat was the SPEED change in the honey-drop group?Required |
The supporting trial reported a within-group SPEED change of 2.53 points, P=.006, in the honey group. This is a before-and-after record in that group. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
The honey group's 3-week SPEED change, original analysis and denominator |
Material needed: It is not converted into added benefit over existing care; baseline and final values, models, variance, denominators and direct between-group results remain unverified. No new difference or CI is calculated. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 4 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N04 · Evidence conditionHow is the regular-lubricant group's change distinguished?Required |
The original control within-group change was 1.087 points, P=.183. Nonsignificance in control is not a test of honey-group superiority. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
The regular-lubricant group's 3-week SPEED change and comparison conditions |
Material needed: Control ingredients, within-group tables, denominators, dispersion and between-group contrasts remain unverified. 1.087 is not subtracted from 2.53 to create a new added effect. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 5 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N05 · Evidence conditionAre P=.006 and P=.183 a between-group superiority test?Required |
The original account explicitly states that the different within-group P values are not a superiority test. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Direct comparison of the changes, between-group P values and CIs |
Material needed: A difference in P values is not treated as a significant difference in effects; direct between-group estimates, CIs, denominators, models, multiplicity and prespecified plans remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 6 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N06 · Evidence conditionAre the direct between-group symptom effect and 95% CI verified?Required |
The stored summary records that the supporting trial's abstract did not present a direct between-group symptom effect. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
The added symptom effect and its original uncertainty |
Material needed: That record about the original abstract is distinguished from external materials being unread in this work. Exact between-group results, CIs, P values, denominators, adjustment and variance remain unverified, without conversion into no effect or established efficacy. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 7 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N07 · Evidence conditionCan overall improvement in 114 participants and 3 groups be assigned to the product?Required |
All groups in the principal trial improved and used common warm compresses, lid massage and preservative-free lubricant. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Added symptom benefit over common care and group-specific results |
Material needed: Overall improvement is not assigned to honey as an ingredient; group-specific symptoms, baselines, time points, denominators, common-care adherence and direct between-group contrasts remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 8 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N08 · Evidence conditionAre 16% drops and 98% gel the same formulation?Required |
The original record distinguishes 16% drops and 98% gel as different formulations. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Formulation-specific symptom effects, administered amounts, frequency and control |
Material needed: An effect from one formulation is not copied to or pooled with another. Formulation-specific products, administered amounts, frequency, symptom scales, denominators, time points and between-group effects remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 9 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N09 · Evidence conditionAre selected P values for clinical signs symptom effects?Supplementary |
In the principal trial, staining with drops P=.035 and gel meibum quality P=.005 and gland expressibility P=.042 were signals in selected signs. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
The direct relevance of staining and meibomian measures to symptom outcomes |
Material needed: These values are not converted into SPEED or patient symptom-effect estimates. Original sign and symptom tables, hierarchy, denominators, formulation and time-point matching remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 10 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N10 · Evidence conditionDoes assessor masking also mean participant masking?Required |
The supporting trial's original design was an assessor-masked randomized trial. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
The roles of assessor masking and symptom reporting and measurement |
Material needed: Double masking of participants and treatment providers or exclusion of expectancy effects is not newly verified. Allocation, concealment, masking roles, symptom responses, control appearance, stinging and assessment methods remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 11 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N11 · Evidence conditionWhat are the limitations of open treatment and multiple outcomes?Required |
The principal trial used an open 3-group randomized design and retained multiple symptoms and signs. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
The principal trial's open 3-group methods, prespecified symptom outcomes and all results |
Material needed: Selected findings are not expanded into superiority for all symptoms. Original methods, registration, protocols, analysis plans, all time points and multiplicity plans remain unverified; no new official assessment is created. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 12 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N12 · Evidence conditionAre 3 weeks and the principal 8 weeks the same duration?Required |
The principal direct trial's 8 weeks and the supporting trial's 3-week SPEED measure are distinguished in the original account. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
The supporting trial's 3 weeks, the principal trial's 8 weeks, and long-term and post-stopping results |
Material needed: One trial's time point is not assigned to another trial or to long-term durability. Report-specific schedules, administration, adherence, endpoint denominators and long-term and post-stopping material remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 13 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N13 · Evidence conditionAre symptom importance, responders and lubricant use verified?Supplementary |
The original outcome list includes symptoms and lubricant use, but prespecified importance, responders and exact between-group medication use are not detailed. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Direct material on SPEED importance, responders, lubricant and rescue-medication use |
Material needed: Thresholds, responders, medication use, denominators, CIs and prespecified hierarchy remain unverified. Within-group means are not converted into treatment-success rates or medication replacement. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 14 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N14 · Evidence conditionHow are medical-grade sterile products distinguished from food honey?Required |
The original record concerns ophthalmic medical-grade products, not evidence for food-grade manuka honey or homemade dilution. Concentration differs from actual instilled amount and frequency. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Manufacture, quality and actual administration of medical-grade 16% drops and 98% gel |
Material needed: Product, sterility, ingredients, manufacture, dose, frequency and administration records remain unverified in detail. Medical-grade product records are not expanded into effects of food-grade or nonsterile products. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 15 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N15 · Evidence conditionWhat was added to common lid care?Required |
In 2017, all groups used common warm compresses, lid massage and preservative-free lubricant. The comparison added medical-grade honey products to that care. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Warm compresses, massage, preservative-free lubricant and formulation-specific additional care |
Material needed: It is not converted into evidence for stopping care or standalone treatment. Common-care rules, adherence, additional and rescue medications, formulation-specific matching and changes remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 16 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N16 · Evidence conditionAre MGD diagnosis and sample size the same information?Required |
The parent question concerns evaporative dry eye from meibomian gland dysfunction. 114 participants is the original sample-size label. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Diagnosis, severity, baseline status and group-specific eligibility in evaporative dry eye |
Material needed: Sample size does not replace diagnostic or eligibility criteria. Diagnosis, severity, baseline symptoms and signs, age, comorbidities and group-specific inclusion and exclusion remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 17 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N17 · Evidence conditionWhat are the symptom denominators in 114 participants and 3 groups?Required |
The principal trial's sample was 114 participants and its design was an open 3-group randomized trial. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Group allocation, completion, analysis and endpoint-specific eye and patient denominators |
Material needed: Group allocation, completion, formulations, care groups, endpoints, time points, bilateral-eye and patient denominators and exclusions remain unverified. Denominators absent from the original are not created. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 18 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N18 · Evidence conditionWhat denominators are 59 randomized and 55 completed?Required |
The supporting trial originally recorded 59 randomized and 55 completed. These values describe separate stages. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Supporting-trial allocation, completion, analysis and group, eye and patient endpoint denominators |
Material needed: Attrition counts or group-specific and endpoint-specific analysis denominators are not calculated or established. Group flow, reasons, time points and eye and patient denominators remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 19 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N19 · Evidence conditionWhat is the impact of missingness, attrition and measurement exclusions?Required |
Overall sample and completion records exist, but endpoint-specific missingness, attrition reasons and analysis conditions are not detailed. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Group flow, missing symptom outcomes, analysis populations and sensitivity analyses |
Material needed: Unread external material is not converted into absence of missingness. Missingness, stopping, exclusions, ITT and completer analyses, missing-data handling, sensitivity and group and eye matching remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 20 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N20 · Evidence conditionWhat were the baseline adjustment, change and testing conditions?Required |
Original P values and selected changes are retained, but detailed adjustment, variance, time points, denominators and effects of interest remain unread in external originals. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
The effect of interest, baseline adjustment, change and final values, and variance |
Material needed: Original analysis plans, statistical tables, baseline and changes, within-eye and within-person correlation, models and CIs remain unverified. New effects or CIs are not back-calculated. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 21 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N21 · Evidence conditionDoes a registration number also verify prespecified plans?Required |
Registration was unverified for the principal trial, while NCT04457648 was recorded for the supporting trial. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Registration, history, primary outcomes, changes and original plans for both trials |
Material needed: The number's existence is not promoted into registration reading in this work, prespecification, hierarchy at all time points or plan adherence. Official registration history, protocols and analysis plans were unread in this work. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 22 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N22 · Evidence conditionDo parent and subquestions share the same reports?Required |
The parent and subquestions share the same Albietz 2017 and Wong 2021 reports. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Report, trial and participant links between the symptom question and other questions |
Material needed: Sheet counts are not counted as new studies or independent replications. Report, trial, registration, sample, institution, timing and additional-report matching and unique trial and participant totals remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 23 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N23 · Evidence conditionIs independent replication across teams, products and formulations verified?Supplementary |
The bibliographies of both reports retain an Albietz author and the specific Optimel product context. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Unique trials and independent teams for the same symptoms, formulation, population, comparison and time point |
Material needed: Different reports or assessor masking alone do not newly establish independent teams or replication under the same conditions. Team, institution, product, funding, participant, effect and denominator matching remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 24 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N24 · Evidence conditionHow much is known about product provision and company involvement?Required |
The principal trial records Optimel product provision and related involvement; the supporting trial records a specific Optimel product, provision and author conflict disclosure. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Trial-specific funding, product support, employee authors and conflicts |
Material needed: Unrecorded funding, employee relationships, analysis and publication roles remain unverified. Product provision is not treated as verification of every involvement route or as absence of independence. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 25 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N25 · Evidence conditionWhat is the scope of reported stinging and redness?Supplementary |
The original record reports temporary stinging and redness and cautions that initial symptoms are possible even with medical-grade formulations. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Medical-grade product adverse reactions, collection methods, stopping and controls |
Material needed: Event counts, incidence or new causality are not created. Collection methods, group and formulation-specific events, severity, timing, stopping, missingness and controls remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 26 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N26 · Evidence conditionWhat are the eye and patient harm denominators and exposures?Supplementary |
114 participants, 59 randomized and 55 completed do not verify safety denominators. Concentrations, formulations, 3 and 8 weeks and common care are not combined as the same harm exposure. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Safety populations, eyes, patients, formulations, durations and actual instillation exposure |
Material needed: Safety denominators, actual instillation, group, eye and formulation-specific events, stopping, exposure and controls remain unverified. Incidence is not calculated. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 27 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N27 · Evidence conditionAre food or nonsterile risks distinguished from medical-grade product reactions?Supplementary |
The original caution distinguishes infection and corneal-injury risks with food-grade, nonsterile and homemade dilutions from initial stinging and redness with medical-grade products. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Manufacture, sterility, baseline eye conditions, other causes and clinical course |
Material needed: The food-honey self-instillation question is distinguished and no new case is created. Products, baseline eye conditions, concurrent use, event timing, alternative causes, controls and course remain unverified; no new harm causality is judged. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 28 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N28 · Evidence conditionAre long-term, rare and vulnerable-population harms verified?Supplementary |
Small short-term trials of specific products and descriptions of temporary reactions do not verify long-term, rare or vulnerable-population safety. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Long exposure, independent harm reports, vulnerable populations and follow-up |
Material needed: Long follow-up, independent harm reports, vulnerable populations, exposure, denominators, concurrent use and course remain unverified. No external search or new harm judgment was performed in this work. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 29 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N29 · Evidence conditionHow does stored-summary reading differ from reading external originals?Required |
The complete parent Korean and English summary, reports and citations were read. PubMed URLs and registration numbers are existing records; external abstracts, full texts, registration, protocols and analysis plans were unread in this work. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
The complete stored summary and the reading scope for external abstracts, full texts, registration and plans |
Material needed: URLs, numbers and historical verification wording do not establish current reading, successful access or fulfilled conditions. External detailed-material availability, acquisition and actual reading remain separately unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 30 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N30 · Evidence conditionWhat do selected C, parent C46, dates and empty values record?Required |
The selected grade is C, with no individual score, status or axes fields. Parent C46, caution, axes, Korean and English records, 2026-09-07 and empty correction and deliberation records are preserved separately. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
The selected grade, absent individual score, parent axes, evidence date and corrections |
Material needed: The parent's 46 points are not assigned as a subclaim score, and the historical evidence date is not changed into a new search, external reading or completed-review date. New material, condition revisions and verdict changes are separate events. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |