| 1 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N01 · Evidence conditionWhich program comparison does the question concern?Required |
The selected question concerns motor-function improvement from the Nordic-walking program versus standard rehabilitation. The added effect of poles is a separate question. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Existing program question versus standard rehabilitation |
Material needed: Original materials for the same population, program, comparator and endpoint are needed. The existing subclaim is retained without creating new clinical certification. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 2 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N02 · Evidence conditionWhich trial directly compared standard rehabilitation?Required |
Szefler-Derela 2020 compared standard rehabilitation in a 40-person, 6-week randomized trial. It is distinguished from ordinary-walking comparisons. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Szefler-Derela's direct program comparison |
Material needed: The original paper, group programs, allocation and analysis denominators, and standard-rehabilitation session details are needed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 3 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N03 · Evidence conditionWhat is the original UPDRS-III result?Required |
The original summary reports median UPDRS-III reductions of 8.5 versus 6.0, P=.047. Its prespecified-primary description is distinguished from unread registration and plans. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Primary endpoint and original group reductions |
Material needed: Group baseline and follow-up values, score direction, analysis methods, between-group estimates and CIs, prespecified plans and denominators are needed. The difference between the medians is not calculated as a new effect. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 4 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N04 · Evidence conditionDoes a borderline P value establish size and precision?Required |
The original account describes UPDRS-III P=.047 as borderline positive; the summary lacks a between-group CI. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Effect estimates, CIs and the borderline signal |
Material needed: Original estimates, CIs, distributions, tests and multiplicity procedures are needed. CIs and standard errors are not back-calculated, and the signal is not expanded into major recovery. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 5 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N05 · Evidence conditionCan DGI also be called improved?Required |
DGI P=.064 in the same 40-person, 6-week trial is null in the original account. The UPDRS-III signal does not replace all balance and gait results. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Separate null DGI and UPDRS-III signal |
Material needed: Original DGI tables, between-group effects and CIs, denominators and endpoint hierarchy are needed. A null result is not converted into proof of effect 0 or equivalence. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 6 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N06 · Evidence conditionAre within-group improvement and added between-group effects the same?Required |
The original explanation is retained: improvement within Nordic walking alone does not establish superiority over walking, treadmill exercise or standard rehabilitation. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Before-and-after change and direct group comparisons |
Material needed: The between-group comparison definition, baseline imbalance, adjustment and denominators are needed. Before-and-after changes or within-group P values are not converted into direct superiority. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 7 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N07 · Evidence conditionIs the program effect the effect of poles alone?Required |
The selected question concerns the whole program versus standard rehabilitation. Supervision, walking training and poles are combined, so it is not reduced to a pole-specific effect. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Combined poles, walking, supervision and training dose |
Material needed: Direct materials separating the pole component with walking controls matched for exercise dose, time, instruction and contact are needed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 8 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N08 · Evidence conditionWhat supporting context does the Reuter trial provide?Required |
Reuter 2011 was a 90-person, 3-arm, 6-month trial. Selected posture, stride and variability signals are not the same results as the 40-person, 6-week standard-rehabilitation comparison. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Selected functional measures with different controls and duration |
Material needed: Original tables by comparator, all endpoints, effects and CIs, denominators and prespecified hierarchy are needed. The total sample is not used as the Nordic-group denominator. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 9 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N09 · Evidence conditionHow far can the Cugusi pilot be linked?Required |
Cugusi 2017 provides a functional-signal citation from a 20-person treadmill pilot. There is no separate original evidence-summary entry, exact value or CI. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Citation-only treadmill-pilot context |
Material needed: The pilot paper, control sessions, endpoints, denominators, effects and CIs, and cohort identity are needed. Values from other trials are not copied. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 10 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N10 · Evidence conditionWhat limit does the null ordinary-walking result impose?Required |
Monteiro's UPDRS group-by-time P=.352 and lack of superiority over ordinary walking are retained. This differs from standard rehabilitation and limits expansion into a pole-specific effect. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Contrary evidence from another direct comparator |
Material needed: Replication with the same comparator, endpoint and time point, plus original effects and CIs, is needed. The null result is not removed or simplified into automatic refutation of the standard-rehabilitation result. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 11 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N11 · Evidence conditionCan all functional results be combined?Required |
The retained endpoint list includes UPDRS-III, DGI, gait and quality of life; direct values concern UPDRS-III and DGI P values. A list alone does not verify positive results for all endpoints. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Endpoint-specific directness, size and clinical importance |
Material needed: Endpoint-specific tables, measures, denominators, time points, between-group CIs and meaningful-change criteria are needed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 12 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N12 · Evidence conditionCan short-term results establish lasting benefit?Required |
The core standard-rehabilitation comparison lasted 6 weeks, Reuter 6 months and Monteiro 8 weeks. These are separate programs; post-training durability is a separate subclaim. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Intervention duration versus post-training follow-up |
Material needed: Long-term direct comparisons of the same program, post-training follow-up, maintenance training and denominators are needed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 13 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N13 · Evidence conditionAre other reports added as independent replications?Required |
The parent's narrative of independent functional signals is historical. Different comparators, endpoints and shared reports are not converted into current independence certification or new totals. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Same-question replication and report-to-trial links |
Material needed: Report, institution, recruitment and participant links, and replication of the same standard-rehabilitation question, are needed. Unique trial and participant totals remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 14 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N14 · Evidence conditionWhich patients does the question concern?Required |
The parent Korean and English scope concerns mild-to-moderate Parkinson's disease. A representative trial's size and duration are not treated as eligibility criteria for all patients. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Detailed eligibility in mild-to-moderate Parkinson's disease |
Material needed: Trial-specific diagnosis, stage, medication state, freezing, orthostatic hypotension, comorbidities and exclusions are needed. The scope is not expanded to severe disease or other patients. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 15 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N15 · Evidence conditionAre actual training dose and supervision known?Required |
The original intervention is supervised training with poles. A program name is not a numeric exercise dose; detailed sessions and actual participation remain unverified. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Sessions, frequency, intensity, pole fitting and adherence |
Material needed: Trial-specific time, frequency, intensity, technique instruction, pole fitting, attendance and control exposure are needed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 16 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N16 · Evidence conditionAre all active exercise controls equivalent?Required |
The original account distinguishes different exercise controls. An active-exercise label alone does not make them the same comparator or question. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Standard rehabilitation, walking, treadmill, flexibility and relaxation |
Material needed: Comparator-specific content, exercise dose, contact time and supervision are needed. Estimates from different comparisons are not copied or pooled. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 17 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N17 · Evidence conditionWere medication, medication timing and concurrent rehabilitation matched?Required |
The original safety narrative mentions medication-timing assessment, but the summary lacks trial-specific medication changes and ON/OFF state at measurement. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Group-specific concurrent care and medication state |
Material needed: Group medications, concurrent exercise and rehabilitation, medication timing, changes and withdrawal reasons are needed. Missing records are not treated as matched care. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 18 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N18 · Evidence conditionHow do total samples differ from analysis denominators?Required |
Reuter's 90 participants and 3 arms, Monteiro's 33 participants and 8 weeks with 32 completers in the citation, Szefler-Derela's 40 participants and 6 weeks, and Cugusi's 20-person pilot are distinguished. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Allocated, completed and endpoint-specific analysis samples |
Material needed: Group allocation, completion, assessment and analysis counts, missing-data handling and ITT materials are needed. Differences and totals are not newly calculated or summed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 19 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N19 · Evidence conditionWhat is known about randomization and masking?Required |
The stored evidence labels randomized trials, with single masking for Monteiro and lack of masking plus multiple endpoints for Reuter. Actual masking by role remains unverified. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Allocation, concealment, assessors, deviations and measurement |
Material needed: Sequence generation, concealment, masking roles and maintenance, missingness, deviations and measurement procedures are needed. No new official RoB2 assessment is executed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 20 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N20 · Evidence conditionHow do shared reports link to original trials?Required |
Parent 3014 and its subclaims share reports. There are 3 original evidence entries and 4 citations; Cugusi is a bibliographic summary without a separate evidence entry. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Report, cohort and participant overlap |
Material needed: Author, institution, recruitment-period, registration and cohort links are needed. Report slots and sheets are not certified as unique trials, participants or independent replications. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 21 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N21 · Evidence conditionWere registration and prespecified plans actually read?Required |
Original evidence records registration as unverified; only the narrative of UPDRS-III as prespecified primary is retained. External registration and plans remain unread. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Registration, protocols, SAPs and endpoint hierarchy |
Material needed: Trial registration, change histories, protocols, SAPs and prespecified analyses are needed. Unverified registration is not asserted to be absent. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 22 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N22 · Evidence conditionHow were multiple endpoints and selective reporting handled?Required |
The parent records small samples, lack of masking, multiple endpoints and selected functional signals. The primary endpoint and other outcomes are not combined at the same evidential level. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Prespecified hierarchy, multiplicity and complete results |
Material needed: Original endpoint lists, analysis order, time points, multiplicity handling and complete results are needed. Selected positive findings are not expanded into recovery of every function. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 23 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N23 · Evidence conditionAre funding, equipment, affiliation and analysis involvement separated?Required |
Specific Reuter funding is unverified. Monteiro records public funding and supplied poles; Szefler-Derela records no external funding and 1 author employed by Novartis. Cugusi funding remains unverified. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Separate checks of company involvement |
Material needed: Disclosures on funding, equipment, company affiliation and COI, and design, analysis and publication involvement are needed. Public funding or no external funding does not certify absence of other involvement. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 24 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N24 · Evidence conditionWhat do the fall and injury records mean?Supplementary |
Falls in the 6-month trial were 4 with Nordic walking, 4 with ordinary walking and 1 with flexibility and relaxation. The original also records sprains, shoulder pain and heat-related hypotension. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Harm events, affected people, exposure and denominators |
Material needed: Active collection, severity, repeated events versus affected people, harm denominators, exposure and causality are needed. Event records are not calculated as incidence rates or fall-prevention effects. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 25 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N25 · Evidence conditionAre safety boundaries for vulnerable patients established?Supplementary |
The original safety narrative states that poles do not correct freezing or orthostatic hypotension and records the need for professional assessment and a fall-prevention plan. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Freezing, impaired balance, orthostatic hypotension and supervision |
Material needed: Vulnerable-patient eligibility and exclusions, assistance, supervision, stopping criteria and harms by medication state are needed. No new individual-care instructions or universal safety certification are created. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 26 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N26 · Evidence conditionWhat is known about post-training durability and harms?Supplementary |
Training lasting weeks to 6 months is not post-training durability evidence. The separate subclaim leaves fall prevention and post-training durability unestablished. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
During-training duration versus post-training follow-up |
Material needed: Independent post-training follow-up, maintenance exercise, adherence, falls, injuries, rare harms and group denominators are needed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 27 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N27 · Evidence conditionHow does stored-summary reading differ from external-original reading?Required |
The complete stored parent JSON was read. Historical citation-verification narratives and cross-check records are retained; external abstracts, full texts, registration, protocols and SAPs remain unread. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Actual reading of summaries, abstracts, full texts, registration and plans |
Material needed: Acquisition, access and reading histories for originals are needed. A URL is not promoted into actual full-text reading, successful access or completed content review. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 28 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N28 · Evidence conditionHow do bilingual wording and representative facets relate?Required |
Parent Korean, English and facets are retained. The representative 90-person, 6-month record is not used as a common value for the 40-person, 6-week or 33-person, 8-week comparisons. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Trial-specific populations, durations and comparisons |
Material needed: Report-specific recruitment, programs, time points, endpoints and original terminology are needed. English translation is not labeled external English full-text verification. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 29 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N29 · Evidence conditionHow do selected C and parent C54 differ?Required |
Selected C has no individual score, status or axes. Parent C54, Caution and B/P/R1/I2/E+/B2/CX remain parent context; the lower C narrative for the pole question is not converted into a new score. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Selected grade versus parent score, axes and safety label |
Material needed: The selected-to-parent application boundary and original values must be preserved. No new grade, score or independent clinical certification is created. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 30 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N30 · Evidence conditionHow are evidence dates, production and correction events separated?Required |
The existing evidence date 2026-09-07, empty corrections array and empty deliberation string are retained. The production date does not replace them as a new evidence-verification date. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Original evidence date, empty corrections and update records |
Material needed: Material additions, condition revisions and verdict changes must remain separate events. Corrections or new evidence absent from the original are not invented. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |