CHAMGAP

Supervised Nordic walking with poles × Motor-function improvement from the Nordic-walking program versus standard rehabilitation

Select a review item to see its details.
Required evidence, verification status and materials actually read
ItemAVerification statusBReading scopeCReview itemDCurrent findingsEWhy unverifiedFRequired materials and conditionsGFurther research
1 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N01 · Evidence conditionWhich program comparison does the question concern?Required
The selected question concerns motor-function improvement from the Nordic-walking program versus standard rehabilitation. The added effect of poles is a separate question.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Existing program question versus standard rehabilitation
Material needed: Original materials for the same population, program, comparator and endpoint are needed. The existing subclaim is retained without creating new clinical certification. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
2 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N02 · Evidence conditionWhich trial directly compared standard rehabilitation?Required
Szefler-Derela 2020 compared standard rehabilitation in a 40-person, 6-week randomized trial. It is distinguished from ordinary-walking comparisons.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Szefler-Derela's direct program comparison
Material needed: The original paper, group programs, allocation and analysis denominators, and standard-rehabilitation session details are needed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
3 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N03 · Evidence conditionWhat is the original UPDRS-III result?Required
The original summary reports median UPDRS-III reductions of 8.5 versus 6.0, P=.047. Its prespecified-primary description is distinguished from unread registration and plans.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Primary endpoint and original group reductions
Material needed: Group baseline and follow-up values, score direction, analysis methods, between-group estimates and CIs, prespecified plans and denominators are needed. The difference between the medians is not calculated as a new effect. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
4 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N04 · Evidence conditionDoes a borderline P value establish size and precision?Required
The original account describes UPDRS-III P=.047 as borderline positive; the summary lacks a between-group CI.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Effect estimates, CIs and the borderline signal
Material needed: Original estimates, CIs, distributions, tests and multiplicity procedures are needed. CIs and standard errors are not back-calculated, and the signal is not expanded into major recovery. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
5 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N05 · Evidence conditionCan DGI also be called improved?Required
DGI P=.064 in the same 40-person, 6-week trial is null in the original account. The UPDRS-III signal does not replace all balance and gait results.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Separate null DGI and UPDRS-III signal
Material needed: Original DGI tables, between-group effects and CIs, denominators and endpoint hierarchy are needed. A null result is not converted into proof of effect 0 or equivalence. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
6 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N06 · Evidence conditionAre within-group improvement and added between-group effects the same?Required
The original explanation is retained: improvement within Nordic walking alone does not establish superiority over walking, treadmill exercise or standard rehabilitation.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Before-and-after change and direct group comparisons
Material needed: The between-group comparison definition, baseline imbalance, adjustment and denominators are needed. Before-and-after changes or within-group P values are not converted into direct superiority. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
7 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N07 · Evidence conditionIs the program effect the effect of poles alone?Required
The selected question concerns the whole program versus standard rehabilitation. Supervision, walking training and poles are combined, so it is not reduced to a pole-specific effect.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Combined poles, walking, supervision and training dose
Material needed: Direct materials separating the pole component with walking controls matched for exercise dose, time, instruction and contact are needed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
8 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N08 · Evidence conditionWhat supporting context does the Reuter trial provide?Required
Reuter 2011 was a 90-person, 3-arm, 6-month trial. Selected posture, stride and variability signals are not the same results as the 40-person, 6-week standard-rehabilitation comparison.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Selected functional measures with different controls and duration
Material needed: Original tables by comparator, all endpoints, effects and CIs, denominators and prespecified hierarchy are needed. The total sample is not used as the Nordic-group denominator. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
9 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N09 · Evidence conditionHow far can the Cugusi pilot be linked?Required
Cugusi 2017 provides a functional-signal citation from a 20-person treadmill pilot. There is no separate original evidence-summary entry, exact value or CI.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Citation-only treadmill-pilot context
Material needed: The pilot paper, control sessions, endpoints, denominators, effects and CIs, and cohort identity are needed. Values from other trials are not copied. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
10 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N10 · Evidence conditionWhat limit does the null ordinary-walking result impose?Required
Monteiro's UPDRS group-by-time P=.352 and lack of superiority over ordinary walking are retained. This differs from standard rehabilitation and limits expansion into a pole-specific effect.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Contrary evidence from another direct comparator
Material needed: Replication with the same comparator, endpoint and time point, plus original effects and CIs, is needed. The null result is not removed or simplified into automatic refutation of the standard-rehabilitation result. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
11 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N11 · Evidence conditionCan all functional results be combined?Required
The retained endpoint list includes UPDRS-III, DGI, gait and quality of life; direct values concern UPDRS-III and DGI P values. A list alone does not verify positive results for all endpoints.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Endpoint-specific directness, size and clinical importance
Material needed: Endpoint-specific tables, measures, denominators, time points, between-group CIs and meaningful-change criteria are needed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
12 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N12 · Evidence conditionCan short-term results establish lasting benefit?Required
The core standard-rehabilitation comparison lasted 6 weeks, Reuter 6 months and Monteiro 8 weeks. These are separate programs; post-training durability is a separate subclaim.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Intervention duration versus post-training follow-up
Material needed: Long-term direct comparisons of the same program, post-training follow-up, maintenance training and denominators are needed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
13 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N13 · Evidence conditionAre other reports added as independent replications?Required
The parent's narrative of independent functional signals is historical. Different comparators, endpoints and shared reports are not converted into current independence certification or new totals.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Same-question replication and report-to-trial links
Material needed: Report, institution, recruitment and participant links, and replication of the same standard-rehabilitation question, are needed. Unique trial and participant totals remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
14 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N14 · Evidence conditionWhich patients does the question concern?Required
The parent Korean and English scope concerns mild-to-moderate Parkinson's disease. A representative trial's size and duration are not treated as eligibility criteria for all patients.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Detailed eligibility in mild-to-moderate Parkinson's disease
Material needed: Trial-specific diagnosis, stage, medication state, freezing, orthostatic hypotension, comorbidities and exclusions are needed. The scope is not expanded to severe disease or other patients. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
15 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N15 · Evidence conditionAre actual training dose and supervision known?Required
The original intervention is supervised training with poles. A program name is not a numeric exercise dose; detailed sessions and actual participation remain unverified.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Sessions, frequency, intensity, pole fitting and adherence
Material needed: Trial-specific time, frequency, intensity, technique instruction, pole fitting, attendance and control exposure are needed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
16 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N16 · Evidence conditionAre all active exercise controls equivalent?Required
The original account distinguishes different exercise controls. An active-exercise label alone does not make them the same comparator or question.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Standard rehabilitation, walking, treadmill, flexibility and relaxation
Material needed: Comparator-specific content, exercise dose, contact time and supervision are needed. Estimates from different comparisons are not copied or pooled. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
17 Unverified Full text not readStored summary read N17 · Evidence conditionWere medication, medication timing and concurrent rehabilitation matched?Required
The original safety narrative mentions medication-timing assessment, but the summary lacks trial-specific medication changes and ON/OFF state at measurement.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Group-specific concurrent care and medication state
Material needed: Group medications, concurrent exercise and rehabilitation, medication timing, changes and withdrawal reasons are needed. Missing records are not treated as matched care. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
18 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N18 · Evidence conditionHow do total samples differ from analysis denominators?Required
Reuter's 90 participants and 3 arms, Monteiro's 33 participants and 8 weeks with 32 completers in the citation, Szefler-Derela's 40 participants and 6 weeks, and Cugusi's 20-person pilot are distinguished.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Allocated, completed and endpoint-specific analysis samples
Material needed: Group allocation, completion, assessment and analysis counts, missing-data handling and ITT materials are needed. Differences and totals are not newly calculated or summed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
19 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N19 · Evidence conditionWhat is known about randomization and masking?Required
The stored evidence labels randomized trials, with single masking for Monteiro and lack of masking plus multiple endpoints for Reuter. Actual masking by role remains unverified.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Allocation, concealment, assessors, deviations and measurement
Material needed: Sequence generation, concealment, masking roles and maintenance, missingness, deviations and measurement procedures are needed. No new official RoB2 assessment is executed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
20 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N20 · Evidence conditionHow do shared reports link to original trials?Required
Parent 3014 and its subclaims share reports. There are 3 original evidence entries and 4 citations; Cugusi is a bibliographic summary without a separate evidence entry.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Report, cohort and participant overlap
Material needed: Author, institution, recruitment-period, registration and cohort links are needed. Report slots and sheets are not certified as unique trials, participants or independent replications. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
21 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N21 · Evidence conditionWere registration and prespecified plans actually read?Required
Original evidence records registration as unverified; only the narrative of UPDRS-III as prespecified primary is retained. External registration and plans remain unread.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Registration, protocols, SAPs and endpoint hierarchy
Material needed: Trial registration, change histories, protocols, SAPs and prespecified analyses are needed. Unverified registration is not asserted to be absent. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
22 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N22 · Evidence conditionHow were multiple endpoints and selective reporting handled?Required
The parent records small samples, lack of masking, multiple endpoints and selected functional signals. The primary endpoint and other outcomes are not combined at the same evidential level.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Prespecified hierarchy, multiplicity and complete results
Material needed: Original endpoint lists, analysis order, time points, multiplicity handling and complete results are needed. Selected positive findings are not expanded into recovery of every function. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
23 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N23 · Evidence conditionAre funding, equipment, affiliation and analysis involvement separated?Required
Specific Reuter funding is unverified. Monteiro records public funding and supplied poles; Szefler-Derela records no external funding and 1 author employed by Novartis. Cugusi funding remains unverified.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Separate checks of company involvement
Material needed: Disclosures on funding, equipment, company affiliation and COI, and design, analysis and publication involvement are needed. Public funding or no external funding does not certify absence of other involvement. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
24 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N24 · Evidence conditionWhat do the fall and injury records mean?Supplementary
Falls in the 6-month trial were 4 with Nordic walking, 4 with ordinary walking and 1 with flexibility and relaxation. The original also records sprains, shoulder pain and heat-related hypotension.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Harm events, affected people, exposure and denominators
Material needed: Active collection, severity, repeated events versus affected people, harm denominators, exposure and causality are needed. Event records are not calculated as incidence rates or fall-prevention effects. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
25 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N25 · Evidence conditionAre safety boundaries for vulnerable patients established?Supplementary
The original safety narrative states that poles do not correct freezing or orthostatic hypotension and records the need for professional assessment and a fall-prevention plan.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Freezing, impaired balance, orthostatic hypotension and supervision
Material needed: Vulnerable-patient eligibility and exclusions, assistance, supervision, stopping criteria and harms by medication state are needed. No new individual-care instructions or universal safety certification are created. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
26 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N26 · Evidence conditionWhat is known about post-training durability and harms?Supplementary
Training lasting weeks to 6 months is not post-training durability evidence. The separate subclaim leaves fall prevention and post-training durability unestablished.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
During-training duration versus post-training follow-up
Material needed: Independent post-training follow-up, maintenance exercise, adherence, falls, injuries, rare harms and group denominators are needed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
27 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N27 · Evidence conditionHow does stored-summary reading differ from external-original reading?Required
The complete stored parent JSON was read. Historical citation-verification narratives and cross-check records are retained; external abstracts, full texts, registration, protocols and SAPs remain unread.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Actual reading of summaries, abstracts, full texts, registration and plans
Material needed: Acquisition, access and reading histories for originals are needed. A URL is not promoted into actual full-text reading, successful access or completed content review. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
28 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N28 · Evidence conditionHow do bilingual wording and representative facets relate?Required
Parent Korean, English and facets are retained. The representative 90-person, 6-month record is not used as a common value for the 40-person, 6-week or 33-person, 8-week comparisons.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Trial-specific populations, durations and comparisons
Material needed: Report-specific recruitment, programs, time points, endpoints and original terminology are needed. English translation is not labeled external English full-text verification. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
29 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N29 · Evidence conditionHow do selected C and parent C54 differ?Required
Selected C has no individual score, status or axes. Parent C54, Caution and B/P/R1/I2/E+/B2/CX remain parent context; the lower C narrative for the pole question is not converted into a new score.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Selected grade versus parent score, axes and safety label
Material needed: The selected-to-parent application boundary and original values must be preserved. No new grade, score or independent clinical certification is created. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
30 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N30 · Evidence conditionHow are evidence dates, production and correction events separated?Required
The existing evidence date 2026-09-07, empty corrections array and empty deliberation string are retained. The production date does not replace them as a new evidence-verification date.
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Original evidence date, empty corrections and update records
Material needed: Material additions, condition revisions and verdict changes must remain separate events. Corrections or new evidence absent from the original are not invented. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
No items match your search or filter.

30 itemsWhat the statuses mean

Assessment scope

Stored-material review date
Not recorded
Original evidence cut-off
2026-09-07
Scope actually checked
Existing review summaries and stored records of methodological application. Full papers, supplements, registrations, plans and original data were not read.
What the dates mean
This is the date the stored materials were checked, not the date of a new search of the clinical literature.
Population
The question concerns a supervised program in mild-to-moderate Parkinson's disease. Trial-specific eligibility, stage, medication state, freezing, orthostatic hypotension and comorbidities remain unverified.
Ingredient, formulation and route
This is the whole supervised Nordic-walking program with poles. A signal from combined walking, poles, instruction and supervision is not reduced to the causal effect of poles alone.
Dose
Session duration, weekly frequency, intensity, pole fitting, instruction, actual attendance and adherence remain unverified. A program name is not converted into a quantitative exposure.
Comparator
The selected comparator is standard rehabilitation. Ordinary walking, treadmill exercise, flexibility and relaxation are separate controls; matching of content, exercise dose, supervision and contact remains unverified.
Measured outcome
The core median UPDRS-III reductions of 8.5 versus 6.0, P=.047 and separate null DGI P=.064 are retained. Between-group CIs, endpoint-specific denominators and meaningful differences remain unverified.
Duration
The selected direct comparison involved 40 participants over 6 weeks. Reuter's 90 participants over 6 months and Monteiro's 33 participants over 8 weeks are different comparisons. Intervention duration is not converted into post-training durability.
Questions outside this scope
Converting a program signal versus standard rehabilitation into a pole-specific effect versus ordinary walking; Combining within-group improvement, different controls, durations or selected endpoints into the same estimate; Using the borderline UPDRS-III signal to replace null DGI or other results; Converting a null superiority test into effect 0, equivalence or noninferiority proof; Extending limited functional signals into recovery, fall prevention, post-training durability or safety for every patient; Adding shared reports, sheets or total samples into new unique trial, participant or independent-replication counts

Evidence and sources

The links below lead to the sources. A link alone does not mean the original source was read or its latest publication status verified.

R01 · Reuter I et al. 2011

PubMed

Material type
3-arm randomized flexibility, walking and Nordic-walking trial
Materials actually read
The complete stored parent Korean and English accounts, original evidence and citations were read. External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocols and SAPs remain unread.
Findings recorded in the stored summary
Selected posture, stride and variability superiority was summarized in a 90-person, 6-month trial.
Record level
These are selected functional signals with other controls and duration, not the same standard-rehabilitation result. Multiple endpoints, lack of masking and gaps in original effects, CIs and denominators are retained.
Study overlap and independent replication
Parent 3014 and the standard-rehabilitation, added-pole-effect, and falls-and-durability subclaims share reports. Reuter, Cugusi, Monteiro and Szefler-Derela are distinguished by controls, durations, endpoints and denominators; reports and sheets are not added into new unique trial, participant or independent-replication counts. Those totals remain unverified.
Public availability, access and reading status by material
MaterialPublic availabilityAccess statusActually readNotes
Stored existing review summaryPreserved copy of the complete parent-verdict stored summaryStored summarySummary readPMID21603199 and DOI10.4061/2011/232473 are retained. Academic-study, specific-funding-unverified, multiple-endpoint and unmasked descriptions are original records. The stored summary date 2026-09-07 is a historical evidence date. Dates for unread external materials were originally unrecorded; acquisition, access, reading and current completed-review dates are not filled in. Unverified registration identifiers are not converted into absence of registration.
External abstractOriginal bibliographic link or needed material; external public availability/access status unverifiedUnread; access not attemptedNot readPMID21603199 and DOI10.4061/2011/232473 are retained. Academic-study, specific-funding-unverified, multiple-endpoint and unmasked descriptions are original records. The stored summary date 2026-09-07 is a historical evidence date. Dates for unread external materials were originally unrecorded; acquisition, access, reading and current completed-review dates are not filled in. Unverified registration identifiers are not converted into absence of registration.
External full textOriginal bibliographic link or needed material; external public availability/access status unverifiedUnread; access not attemptedNot readPMID21603199 and DOI10.4061/2011/232473 are retained. Academic-study, specific-funding-unverified, multiple-endpoint and unmasked descriptions are original records. The stored summary date 2026-09-07 is a historical evidence date. Dates for unread external materials were originally unrecorded; acquisition, access, reading and current completed-review dates are not filled in. Unverified registration identifiers are not converted into absence of registration.
Registration materialOriginal bibliographic link or needed material; external public availability/access status unverifiedUnread; access not attemptedNot readPMID21603199 and DOI10.4061/2011/232473 are retained. Academic-study, specific-funding-unverified, multiple-endpoint and unmasked descriptions are original records. The stored summary date 2026-09-07 is a historical evidence date. Dates for unread external materials were originally unrecorded; acquisition, access, reading and current completed-review dates are not filled in. Unverified registration identifiers are not converted into absence of registration.
Protocol and analysis planOriginal bibliographic link or needed material; external public availability/access status unverifiedUnread; access not attemptedNot readPMID21603199 and DOI10.4061/2011/232473 are retained. Academic-study, specific-funding-unverified, multiple-endpoint and unmasked descriptions are original records. The stored summary date 2026-09-07 is a historical evidence date. Dates for unread external materials were originally unrecorded; acquisition, access, reading and current completed-review dates are not filled in. Unverified registration identifiers are not converted into absence of registration.

R02 · Cugusi L et al. 2017 · Bibliographic summary

PubMed

Material type
Citation-only randomized treadmill-control pilot
Materials actually read
The complete stored parent Korean and English accounts, original evidence and citations were read. External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocols and SAPs remain unread.
Findings recorded in the stored summary
The original citation summarizes functional signals from a 20-person treadmill pilot.
Record level
This is a citation-only record without a separate original evidence entry. Exact effects, CIs, endpoint-specific denominators, funding and detailed duration remain unverified. Values from other trials are not copied.
Study overlap and independent replication
Parent 3014 and the standard-rehabilitation, added-pole-effect, and falls-and-durability subclaims share reports. Reuter, Cugusi, Monteiro and Szefler-Derela are distinguished by controls, durations, endpoints and denominators; reports and sheets are not added into new unique trial, participant or independent-replication counts. Those totals remain unverified.
Public availability, access and reading status by material
MaterialPublic availabilityAccess statusActually readNotes
Stored existing review summaryPreserved copy of the complete parent-verdict stored summaryStored summarySummary readThis is the citation-only pilot with PMID27798812 and DOI10.1007/s40520-016-0648-9. No separate original evidence entry or quantitative effect is created. The stored summary date 2026-09-07 is a historical evidence date. Dates for unread external materials were originally unrecorded; acquisition, access, reading and current completed-review dates are not filled in. Unverified registration identifiers are not converted into absence of registration.
External abstractOriginal bibliographic link or needed material; external public availability/access status unverifiedUnread; access not attemptedNot readThis is the citation-only pilot with PMID27798812 and DOI10.1007/s40520-016-0648-9. No separate original evidence entry or quantitative effect is created. The stored summary date 2026-09-07 is a historical evidence date. Dates for unread external materials were originally unrecorded; acquisition, access, reading and current completed-review dates are not filled in. Unverified registration identifiers are not converted into absence of registration.
External full textOriginal bibliographic link or needed material; external public availability/access status unverifiedUnread; access not attemptedNot readThis is the citation-only pilot with PMID27798812 and DOI10.1007/s40520-016-0648-9. No separate original evidence entry or quantitative effect is created. The stored summary date 2026-09-07 is a historical evidence date. Dates for unread external materials were originally unrecorded; acquisition, access, reading and current completed-review dates are not filled in. Unverified registration identifiers are not converted into absence of registration.
Registration materialOriginal bibliographic link or needed material; external public availability/access status unverifiedUnread; access not attemptedNot readThis is the citation-only pilot with PMID27798812 and DOI10.1007/s40520-016-0648-9. No separate original evidence entry or quantitative effect is created. The stored summary date 2026-09-07 is a historical evidence date. Dates for unread external materials were originally unrecorded; acquisition, access, reading and current completed-review dates are not filled in. Unverified registration identifiers are not converted into absence of registration.
Protocol and analysis planOriginal bibliographic link or needed material; external public availability/access status unverifiedUnread; access not attemptedNot readThis is the citation-only pilot with PMID27798812 and DOI10.1007/s40520-016-0648-9. No separate original evidence entry or quantitative effect is created. The stored summary date 2026-09-07 is a historical evidence date. Dates for unread external materials were originally unrecorded; acquisition, access, reading and current completed-review dates are not filled in. Unverified registration identifiers are not converted into absence of registration.

R03 · Monteiro EP et al. 2021

PubMed

Material type
Single-blind randomized Nordic-walking versus ordinary-walking trial
Materials actually read
The complete stored parent Korean and English accounts, original evidence and citations were read. External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocols and SAPs remain unread.
Findings recorded in the stored summary
The 33-person, 8-week report records no superiority with UPDRS group-by-time P=.352. The original citation separately records 32 completers.
Record level
A null result against another direct walking control limits expansion into a pole-specific effect. It is not pooled with standard rehabilitation or converted into equivalence or exact effect 0.
Study overlap and independent replication
Parent 3014 and the standard-rehabilitation, added-pole-effect, and falls-and-durability subclaims share reports. Reuter, Cugusi, Monteiro and Szefler-Derela are distinguished by controls, durations, endpoints and denominators; reports and sheets are not added into new unique trial, participant or independent-replication counts. Those totals remain unverified.
Public availability, access and reading status by material
MaterialPublic availabilityAccess statusActually readNotes
Stored existing review summaryPreserved copy of the complete parent-verdict stored summaryStored summarySummary readPMID32529596 and DOI10.1007/s40520-020-01617-w are retained. Public-funding and supplied-pole narratives are distinguished without promotion into independence certification. The stored summary date 2026-09-07 is a historical evidence date. Dates for unread external materials were originally unrecorded; acquisition, access, reading and current completed-review dates are not filled in. Unverified registration identifiers are not converted into absence of registration.
External abstractOriginal bibliographic link or needed material; external public availability/access status unverifiedUnread; access not attemptedNot readPMID32529596 and DOI10.1007/s40520-020-01617-w are retained. Public-funding and supplied-pole narratives are distinguished without promotion into independence certification. The stored summary date 2026-09-07 is a historical evidence date. Dates for unread external materials were originally unrecorded; acquisition, access, reading and current completed-review dates are not filled in. Unverified registration identifiers are not converted into absence of registration.
External full textOriginal bibliographic link or needed material; external public availability/access status unverifiedUnread; access not attemptedNot readPMID32529596 and DOI10.1007/s40520-020-01617-w are retained. Public-funding and supplied-pole narratives are distinguished without promotion into independence certification. The stored summary date 2026-09-07 is a historical evidence date. Dates for unread external materials were originally unrecorded; acquisition, access, reading and current completed-review dates are not filled in. Unverified registration identifiers are not converted into absence of registration.
Registration materialOriginal bibliographic link or needed material; external public availability/access status unverifiedUnread; access not attemptedNot readPMID32529596 and DOI10.1007/s40520-020-01617-w are retained. Public-funding and supplied-pole narratives are distinguished without promotion into independence certification. The stored summary date 2026-09-07 is a historical evidence date. Dates for unread external materials were originally unrecorded; acquisition, access, reading and current completed-review dates are not filled in. Unverified registration identifiers are not converted into absence of registration.
Protocol and analysis planOriginal bibliographic link or needed material; external public availability/access status unverifiedUnread; access not attemptedNot readPMID32529596 and DOI10.1007/s40520-020-01617-w are retained. Public-funding and supplied-pole narratives are distinguished without promotion into independence certification. The stored summary date 2026-09-07 is a historical evidence date. Dates for unread external materials were originally unrecorded; acquisition, access, reading and current completed-review dates are not filled in. Unverified registration identifiers are not converted into absence of registration.

R04 · Szefler-Derela J et al. 2020

PubMed

Material type
Randomized Nordic-walking versus standard-rehabilitation trial
Materials actually read
The complete stored parent Korean and English accounts, original evidence and citations were read. External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocols and SAPs remain unread.
Findings recorded in the stored summary
Median UPDRS-III reductions of 8.5 versus 6.0, P=.047 and null DGI P=.064 in the 40-person, 6-week trial are distinguished.
Record level
This is the core direct comparison for the selected question. The original prespecified-primary narrative is retained alongside unread registration and plans, missing between-group CIs, denominators and meaningful differences, and unverified exact results for other endpoints.
Study overlap and independent replication
Parent 3014 and the standard-rehabilitation, added-pole-effect, and falls-and-durability subclaims share reports. Reuter, Cugusi, Monteiro and Szefler-Derela are distinguished by controls, durations, endpoints and denominators; reports and sheets are not added into new unique trial, participant or independent-replication counts. Those totals remain unverified.
Public availability, access and reading status by material
MaterialPublic availabilityAccess statusActually readNotes
Stored existing review summaryPreserved copy of the complete parent-verdict stored summaryStored summarySummary readPMID32708938 and DOI10.3390/medicina56070356 are retained. Both reported absence of external funding and 1 author employed by Novartis are preserved. The stored summary date 2026-09-07 is a historical evidence date. Dates for unread external materials were originally unrecorded; acquisition, access, reading and current completed-review dates are not filled in. Unverified registration identifiers are not converted into absence of registration.
External abstractOriginal bibliographic link or needed material; external public availability/access status unverifiedUnread; access not attemptedNot readPMID32708938 and DOI10.3390/medicina56070356 are retained. Both reported absence of external funding and 1 author employed by Novartis are preserved. The stored summary date 2026-09-07 is a historical evidence date. Dates for unread external materials were originally unrecorded; acquisition, access, reading and current completed-review dates are not filled in. Unverified registration identifiers are not converted into absence of registration.
External full textOriginal bibliographic link or needed material; external public availability/access status unverifiedUnread; access not attemptedNot readPMID32708938 and DOI10.3390/medicina56070356 are retained. Both reported absence of external funding and 1 author employed by Novartis are preserved. The stored summary date 2026-09-07 is a historical evidence date. Dates for unread external materials were originally unrecorded; acquisition, access, reading and current completed-review dates are not filled in. Unverified registration identifiers are not converted into absence of registration.
Registration materialOriginal bibliographic link or needed material; external public availability/access status unverifiedUnread; access not attemptedNot readPMID32708938 and DOI10.3390/medicina56070356 are retained. Both reported absence of external funding and 1 author employed by Novartis are preserved. The stored summary date 2026-09-07 is a historical evidence date. Dates for unread external materials were originally unrecorded; acquisition, access, reading and current completed-review dates are not filled in. Unverified registration identifiers are not converted into absence of registration.
Protocol and analysis planOriginal bibliographic link or needed material; external public availability/access status unverifiedUnread; access not attemptedNot readPMID32708938 and DOI10.3390/medicina56070356 are retained. Both reported absence of external funding and 1 author employed by Novartis are preserved. The stored summary date 2026-09-07 is a historical evidence date. Dates for unread external materials were originally unrecorded; acquisition, access, reading and current completed-review dates are not filled in. Unverified registration identifiers are not converted into absence of registration.

Report counts versus independent study counts

Parent 3014 and the standard-rehabilitation, added-pole-effect, and falls-and-durability subclaims share reports. Reuter, Cugusi, Monteiro and Szefler-Derela are distinguished by controls, durations, endpoints and denominators; reports and sheets are not added into new unique trial, participant or independent-replication counts. Those totals remain unverified.

Review criteria

Version 1.0 · Criteria record date 2026-10-06. These are Chamgap's own application conditions, informed by the referenced methods. They do not constitute official assessment-tool certification or a new efficacy score.

N01 · Which program comparison does the question concern?
Required materials and conditions
Existing program question versus standard rehabilitation
Conditions for verification
Original material on Existing program question versus standard rehabilitation must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Existing program question versus standard rehabilitation is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
N02 · Which trial directly compared standard rehabilitation?
Required materials and conditions
Szefler-Derela's direct program comparison
Conditions for verification
Original material on Szefler-Derela's direct program comparison must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Szefler-Derela's direct program comparison is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
N03 · What is the original UPDRS-III result?
Required materials and conditions
Primary endpoint and original group reductions
Conditions for verification
Original material on Primary endpoint and original group reductions must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Primary endpoint and original group reductions is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
N04 · Does a borderline P value establish size and precision?
Required materials and conditions
Effect estimates, CIs and the borderline signal
Conditions for verification
Original material on Effect estimates, CIs and the borderline signal must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Effect estimates, CIs and the borderline signal is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
N05 · Can DGI also be called improved?
Required materials and conditions
Separate null DGI and UPDRS-III signal
Conditions for verification
Original material on Separate null DGI and UPDRS-III signal must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Separate null DGI and UPDRS-III signal is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
N06 · Are within-group improvement and added between-group effects the same?
Required materials and conditions
Before-and-after change and direct group comparisons
Conditions for verification
Original material on Before-and-after change and direct group comparisons must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Before-and-after change and direct group comparisons is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
N07 · Is the program effect the effect of poles alone?
Required materials and conditions
Combined poles, walking, supervision and training dose
Conditions for verification
Original material on Combined poles, walking, supervision and training dose must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Combined poles, walking, supervision and training dose is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
N08 · What supporting context does the Reuter trial provide?
Required materials and conditions
Selected functional measures with different controls and duration
Conditions for verification
Original material on Selected functional measures with different controls and duration must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Selected functional measures with different controls and duration is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
N09 · How far can the Cugusi pilot be linked?
Required materials and conditions
Citation-only treadmill-pilot context
Conditions for verification
Original material on Citation-only treadmill-pilot context must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Citation-only treadmill-pilot context is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
N10 · What limit does the null ordinary-walking result impose?
Required materials and conditions
Contrary evidence from another direct comparator
Conditions for verification
Original material on Contrary evidence from another direct comparator must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Contrary evidence from another direct comparator is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
N11 · Can all functional results be combined?
Required materials and conditions
Endpoint-specific directness, size and clinical importance
Conditions for verification
Original material on Endpoint-specific directness, size and clinical importance must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Endpoint-specific directness, size and clinical importance is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
N12 · Can short-term results establish lasting benefit?
Required materials and conditions
Intervention duration versus post-training follow-up
Conditions for verification
Original material on Intervention duration versus post-training follow-up must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Intervention duration versus post-training follow-up is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
N13 · Are other reports added as independent replications?
Required materials and conditions
Same-question replication and report-to-trial links
Conditions for verification
Original material on Same-question replication and report-to-trial links must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Same-question replication and report-to-trial links is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
N14 · Which patients does the question concern?
Required materials and conditions
Detailed eligibility in mild-to-moderate Parkinson's disease
Conditions for verification
Original material on Detailed eligibility in mild-to-moderate Parkinson's disease must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Detailed eligibility in mild-to-moderate Parkinson's disease is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
N15 · Are actual training dose and supervision known?
Required materials and conditions
Sessions, frequency, intensity, pole fitting and adherence
Conditions for verification
Original material on Sessions, frequency, intensity, pole fitting and adherence must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Sessions, frequency, intensity, pole fitting and adherence is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
N16 · Are all active exercise controls equivalent?
Required materials and conditions
Standard rehabilitation, walking, treadmill, flexibility and relaxation
Conditions for verification
Original material on Standard rehabilitation, walking, treadmill, flexibility and relaxation must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Standard rehabilitation, walking, treadmill, flexibility and relaxation is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
N17 · Were medication, medication timing and concurrent rehabilitation matched?
Required materials and conditions
Group-specific concurrent care and medication state
Conditions for verification
Original material on Group-specific concurrent care and medication state must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Group-specific concurrent care and medication state is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
N18 · How do total samples differ from analysis denominators?
Required materials and conditions
Allocated, completed and endpoint-specific analysis samples
Conditions for verification
Original material on Allocated, completed and endpoint-specific analysis samples must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Allocated, completed and endpoint-specific analysis samples is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
N19 · What is known about randomization and masking?
Required materials and conditions
Allocation, concealment, assessors, deviations and measurement
Conditions for verification
Original material on Allocation, concealment, assessors, deviations and measurement must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Allocation, concealment, assessors, deviations and measurement is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
N20 · How do shared reports link to original trials?
Required materials and conditions
Report, cohort and participant overlap
Conditions for verification
Original material on Report, cohort and participant overlap must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Report, cohort and participant overlap is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
N21 · Were registration and prespecified plans actually read?
Required materials and conditions
Registration, protocols, SAPs and endpoint hierarchy
Conditions for verification
Original material on Registration, protocols, SAPs and endpoint hierarchy must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Registration, protocols, SAPs and endpoint hierarchy is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
N22 · How were multiple endpoints and selective reporting handled?
Required materials and conditions
Prespecified hierarchy, multiplicity and complete results
Conditions for verification
Original material on Prespecified hierarchy, multiplicity and complete results must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Prespecified hierarchy, multiplicity and complete results is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
N23 · Are funding, equipment, affiliation and analysis involvement separated?
Required materials and conditions
Separate checks of company involvement
Conditions for verification
Original material on Separate checks of company involvement must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Separate checks of company involvement is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
N24 · What do the fall and injury records mean?
Required materials and conditions
Harm events, affected people, exposure and denominators
Conditions for verification
Original material on Harm events, affected people, exposure and denominators must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Supplementary
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Harm events, affected people, exposure and denominators is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
N25 · Are safety boundaries for vulnerable patients established?
Required materials and conditions
Freezing, impaired balance, orthostatic hypotension and supervision
Conditions for verification
Original material on Freezing, impaired balance, orthostatic hypotension and supervision must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Supplementary
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Freezing, impaired balance, orthostatic hypotension and supervision is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
N26 · What is known about post-training durability and harms?
Required materials and conditions
During-training duration versus post-training follow-up
Conditions for verification
Original material on During-training duration versus post-training follow-up must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Supplementary
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on During-training duration versus post-training follow-up is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
N27 · How does stored-summary reading differ from external-original reading?
Required materials and conditions
Actual reading of summaries, abstracts, full texts, registration and plans
Conditions for verification
Original material on Actual reading of summaries, abstracts, full texts, registration and plans must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Actual reading of summaries, abstracts, full texts, registration and plans is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
N28 · How do bilingual wording and representative facets relate?
Required materials and conditions
Trial-specific populations, durations and comparisons
Conditions for verification
Original material on Trial-specific populations, durations and comparisons must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Trial-specific populations, durations and comparisons is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
N29 · How do selected C and parent C54 differ?
Required materials and conditions
Selected grade versus parent score, axes and safety label
Conditions for verification
Original material on Selected grade versus parent score, axes and safety label must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Selected grade versus parent score, axes and safety label is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
N30 · How are evidence dates, production and correction events separated?
Required materials and conditions
Original evidence date, empty corrections and update records
Conditions for verification
Original material on Original evidence date, empty corrections and update records must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Original evidence date, empty corrections and update records is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.
Referenced methods and the sections actually reviewed

M03 · Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08

Official methodology · §3.1, §3.2.1–3.2.3, MECIR C5/C7/C13

Referenced principle
Clearly record the question, eligibility conditions and reasons for changes, and distinguish variations in interventions.
Extent of review
Existing methodological links were reused for production. External originals were not reread and methodological content was not reassessed.

M04 · Cochrane Handbook 6.5.1 (2025), chapter updated 2025-03

Official methodology · §4.5, §4.6.1–4.6.3, MECIR C42

Referenced principle
Distinguish studies from reports and link them; do not omit a study solely because results are unreported.
Extent of review
Existing methodological links were reused for production. External originals were not reread and methodological content was not reassessed.

M08 · Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10

Official methodology · §8.1–8.2.3, Table 8.2.a

Referenced principle
Define the outcome and effect of interest, then examine randomization, deviations, missing data, measurement and selective reporting.
Extent of review
Existing methodological links were reused for production. External originals were not reread and methodological content was not reassessed.

M15 · Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08

Official methodology · §15.2.4, §15.3.1–15.3.3

Referenced principle
Distinguish effect estimates, intervals, importance and applicability. Sample size alone does not determine precision.
Extent of review
Existing methodological links were reused for production. External originals were not reread and methodological content was not reassessed.

M19 · Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10

Official methodology · §19.1.2, §19.2.1–19.2.4

Referenced principle
Harm questions may require different designs, populations and follow-up from efficacy questions. Case reports do not establish incidence rates.
Extent of review
Existing methodological links were reused for production. External originals were not reread and methodological content was not reassessed.
What the statuses mean
Partly verified
Partial information from the stored summary is linked; detailed originals and content review remain incomplete.
Unverified
Required details cannot be established within the preserved scope. This does not establish absence of effects or studies, or safety.
Review incomplete
Review of existing content remains incomplete.
Met
This state is used only within the relevant conditions after material verification and content review. It was not automatically assigned in this work.
Not reported
Unreported within material actually read. Unread external material is not relabeled as unreported.
Inaccessible
This means actual access failure. External access was not attempted in this work, so this state was not assigned.
Not applicable
Used only with an application exception and reason based on the question scope.
Conflicting data
This requires actual comparison of materials; no new conflict judgment was made in this work.
Insufficient evidence for the conditions
This indicates gaps in additional material for the selected conditions. Unread material as a whole is not converted into an efficacy grade.

Change history

2026-10-21 · Public page/material version 1.0

Public-facing views and materials were prepared from the existing 30 items. No new clinical search, verification-status change or scoring was performed.

The stored-material review date (Not recorded) and original evidence cut-off (2026-09-07) were retained unchanged.

Researcher downloads

These materials provide the same evidence, scope and verification status as this page.

View all item details

N01 · Which program comparison does the question concern?

Current findings
The selected question concerns motor-function improvement from the Nordic-walking program versus standard rehabilitation. The added effect of poles is a separate question.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
Original materials for the same population, program, comparator and endpoint are needed. The existing subclaim is retained without creating new clinical certification.
Required materials and conditions
Existing program question versus standard rehabilitation
Materials to obtain first
Original materials for the same population, program, comparator and endpoint are needed. The existing subclaim is retained without creating new clinical certification.
Further research
Material needed: Original materials for the same population, program, comparator and endpoint are needed. The existing subclaim is retained without creating new clinical certification. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on Existing program question versus standard rehabilitation must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Existing program question versus standard rehabilitation is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R04

N02 · Which trial directly compared standard rehabilitation?

Current findings
Szefler-Derela 2020 compared standard rehabilitation in a 40-person, 6-week randomized trial. It is distinguished from ordinary-walking comparisons.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
The original paper, group programs, allocation and analysis denominators, and standard-rehabilitation session details are needed.
Required materials and conditions
Szefler-Derela's direct program comparison
Materials to obtain first
The original paper, group programs, allocation and analysis denominators, and standard-rehabilitation session details are needed.
Further research
Material needed: The original paper, group programs, allocation and analysis denominators, and standard-rehabilitation session details are needed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on Szefler-Derela's direct program comparison must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Szefler-Derela's direct program comparison is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R04

N03 · What is the original UPDRS-III result?

Current findings
The original summary reports median UPDRS-III reductions of 8.5 versus 6.0, P=.047. Its prespecified-primary description is distinguished from unread registration and plans.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
Group baseline and follow-up values, score direction, analysis methods, between-group estimates and CIs, prespecified plans and denominators are needed. The difference between the medians is not calculated as a new effect.
Required materials and conditions
Primary endpoint and original group reductions
Materials to obtain first
Group baseline and follow-up values, score direction, analysis methods, between-group estimates and CIs, prespecified plans and denominators are needed. The difference between the medians is not calculated as a new effect.
Further research
Material needed: Group baseline and follow-up values, score direction, analysis methods, between-group estimates and CIs, prespecified plans and denominators are needed. The difference between the medians is not calculated as a new effect. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on Primary endpoint and original group reductions must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Primary endpoint and original group reductions is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R04

N04 · Does a borderline P value establish size and precision?

Current findings
The original account describes UPDRS-III P=.047 as borderline positive; the summary lacks a between-group CI.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
Original estimates, CIs, distributions, tests and multiplicity procedures are needed. CIs and standard errors are not back-calculated, and the signal is not expanded into major recovery.
Required materials and conditions
Effect estimates, CIs and the borderline signal
Materials to obtain first
Original estimates, CIs, distributions, tests and multiplicity procedures are needed. CIs and standard errors are not back-calculated, and the signal is not expanded into major recovery.
Further research
Material needed: Original estimates, CIs, distributions, tests and multiplicity procedures are needed. CIs and standard errors are not back-calculated, and the signal is not expanded into major recovery. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on Effect estimates, CIs and the borderline signal must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Effect estimates, CIs and the borderline signal is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R04

N05 · Can DGI also be called improved?

Current findings
DGI P=.064 in the same 40-person, 6-week trial is null in the original account. The UPDRS-III signal does not replace all balance and gait results.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
Original DGI tables, between-group effects and CIs, denominators and endpoint hierarchy are needed. A null result is not converted into proof of effect 0 or equivalence.
Required materials and conditions
Separate null DGI and UPDRS-III signal
Materials to obtain first
Original DGI tables, between-group effects and CIs, denominators and endpoint hierarchy are needed. A null result is not converted into proof of effect 0 or equivalence.
Further research
Material needed: Original DGI tables, between-group effects and CIs, denominators and endpoint hierarchy are needed. A null result is not converted into proof of effect 0 or equivalence. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on Separate null DGI and UPDRS-III signal must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Separate null DGI and UPDRS-III signal is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R04

N06 · Are within-group improvement and added between-group effects the same?

Current findings
The original explanation is retained: improvement within Nordic walking alone does not establish superiority over walking, treadmill exercise or standard rehabilitation.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
The between-group comparison definition, baseline imbalance, adjustment and denominators are needed. Before-and-after changes or within-group P values are not converted into direct superiority.
Required materials and conditions
Before-and-after change and direct group comparisons
Materials to obtain first
The between-group comparison definition, baseline imbalance, adjustment and denominators are needed. Before-and-after changes or within-group P values are not converted into direct superiority.
Further research
Material needed: The between-group comparison definition, baseline imbalance, adjustment and denominators are needed. Before-and-after changes or within-group P values are not converted into direct superiority. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on Before-and-after change and direct group comparisons must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Before-and-after change and direct group comparisons is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R04

N07 · Is the program effect the effect of poles alone?

Current findings
The selected question concerns the whole program versus standard rehabilitation. Supervision, walking training and poles are combined, so it is not reduced to a pole-specific effect.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
Direct materials separating the pole component with walking controls matched for exercise dose, time, instruction and contact are needed.
Required materials and conditions
Combined poles, walking, supervision and training dose
Materials to obtain first
Direct materials separating the pole component with walking controls matched for exercise dose, time, instruction and contact are needed.
Further research
Material needed: Direct materials separating the pole component with walking controls matched for exercise dose, time, instruction and contact are needed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on Combined poles, walking, supervision and training dose must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Combined poles, walking, supervision and training dose is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R03 R04

N08 · What supporting context does the Reuter trial provide?

Current findings
Reuter 2011 was a 90-person, 3-arm, 6-month trial. Selected posture, stride and variability signals are not the same results as the 40-person, 6-week standard-rehabilitation comparison.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
Original tables by comparator, all endpoints, effects and CIs, denominators and prespecified hierarchy are needed. The total sample is not used as the Nordic-group denominator.
Required materials and conditions
Selected functional measures with different controls and duration
Materials to obtain first
Original tables by comparator, all endpoints, effects and CIs, denominators and prespecified hierarchy are needed. The total sample is not used as the Nordic-group denominator.
Further research
Material needed: Original tables by comparator, all endpoints, effects and CIs, denominators and prespecified hierarchy are needed. The total sample is not used as the Nordic-group denominator. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on Selected functional measures with different controls and duration must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Selected functional measures with different controls and duration is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R01 R04

N09 · How far can the Cugusi pilot be linked?

Current findings
Cugusi 2017 provides a functional-signal citation from a 20-person treadmill pilot. There is no separate original evidence-summary entry, exact value or CI.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
The pilot paper, control sessions, endpoints, denominators, effects and CIs, and cohort identity are needed. Values from other trials are not copied.
Required materials and conditions
Citation-only treadmill-pilot context
Materials to obtain first
The pilot paper, control sessions, endpoints, denominators, effects and CIs, and cohort identity are needed. Values from other trials are not copied.
Further research
Material needed: The pilot paper, control sessions, endpoints, denominators, effects and CIs, and cohort identity are needed. Values from other trials are not copied. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on Citation-only treadmill-pilot context must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Citation-only treadmill-pilot context is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R02 R04

N10 · What limit does the null ordinary-walking result impose?

Current findings
Monteiro's UPDRS group-by-time P=.352 and lack of superiority over ordinary walking are retained. This differs from standard rehabilitation and limits expansion into a pole-specific effect.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
Replication with the same comparator, endpoint and time point, plus original effects and CIs, is needed. The null result is not removed or simplified into automatic refutation of the standard-rehabilitation result.
Required materials and conditions
Contrary evidence from another direct comparator
Materials to obtain first
Replication with the same comparator, endpoint and time point, plus original effects and CIs, is needed. The null result is not removed or simplified into automatic refutation of the standard-rehabilitation result.
Further research
Material needed: Replication with the same comparator, endpoint and time point, plus original effects and CIs, is needed. The null result is not removed or simplified into automatic refutation of the standard-rehabilitation result. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on Contrary evidence from another direct comparator must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Contrary evidence from another direct comparator is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R03 R04

N11 · Can all functional results be combined?

Current findings
The retained endpoint list includes UPDRS-III, DGI, gait and quality of life; direct values concern UPDRS-III and DGI P values. A list alone does not verify positive results for all endpoints.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
Endpoint-specific tables, measures, denominators, time points, between-group CIs and meaningful-change criteria are needed.
Required materials and conditions
Endpoint-specific directness, size and clinical importance
Materials to obtain first
Endpoint-specific tables, measures, denominators, time points, between-group CIs and meaningful-change criteria are needed.
Further research
Material needed: Endpoint-specific tables, measures, denominators, time points, between-group CIs and meaningful-change criteria are needed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on Endpoint-specific directness, size and clinical importance must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Endpoint-specific directness, size and clinical importance is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R04

N12 · Can short-term results establish lasting benefit?

Current findings
The core standard-rehabilitation comparison lasted 6 weeks, Reuter 6 months and Monteiro 8 weeks. These are separate programs; post-training durability is a separate subclaim.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
Long-term direct comparisons of the same program, post-training follow-up, maintenance training and denominators are needed.
Required materials and conditions
Intervention duration versus post-training follow-up
Materials to obtain first
Long-term direct comparisons of the same program, post-training follow-up, maintenance training and denominators are needed.
Further research
Material needed: Long-term direct comparisons of the same program, post-training follow-up, maintenance training and denominators are needed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on Intervention duration versus post-training follow-up must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Intervention duration versus post-training follow-up is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R01 R03 R04

N13 · Are other reports added as independent replications?

Current findings
The parent's narrative of independent functional signals is historical. Different comparators, endpoints and shared reports are not converted into current independence certification or new totals.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
Report, institution, recruitment and participant links, and replication of the same standard-rehabilitation question, are needed. Unique trial and participant totals remain unverified.
Required materials and conditions
Same-question replication and report-to-trial links
Materials to obtain first
Report, institution, recruitment and participant links, and replication of the same standard-rehabilitation question, are needed. Unique trial and participant totals remain unverified.
Further research
Material needed: Report, institution, recruitment and participant links, and replication of the same standard-rehabilitation question, are needed. Unique trial and participant totals remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on Same-question replication and report-to-trial links must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Same-question replication and report-to-trial links is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R01 R02 R03 R04

N14 · Which patients does the question concern?

Current findings
The parent Korean and English scope concerns mild-to-moderate Parkinson's disease. A representative trial's size and duration are not treated as eligibility criteria for all patients.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
Trial-specific diagnosis, stage, medication state, freezing, orthostatic hypotension, comorbidities and exclusions are needed. The scope is not expanded to severe disease or other patients.
Required materials and conditions
Detailed eligibility in mild-to-moderate Parkinson's disease
Materials to obtain first
Trial-specific diagnosis, stage, medication state, freezing, orthostatic hypotension, comorbidities and exclusions are needed. The scope is not expanded to severe disease or other patients.
Further research
Material needed: Trial-specific diagnosis, stage, medication state, freezing, orthostatic hypotension, comorbidities and exclusions are needed. The scope is not expanded to severe disease or other patients. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on Detailed eligibility in mild-to-moderate Parkinson's disease must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Detailed eligibility in mild-to-moderate Parkinson's disease is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R01 R02 R03 R04

N15 · Are actual training dose and supervision known?

Current findings
The original intervention is supervised training with poles. A program name is not a numeric exercise dose; detailed sessions and actual participation remain unverified.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
Trial-specific time, frequency, intensity, technique instruction, pole fitting, attendance and control exposure are needed.
Required materials and conditions
Sessions, frequency, intensity, pole fitting and adherence
Materials to obtain first
Trial-specific time, frequency, intensity, technique instruction, pole fitting, attendance and control exposure are needed.
Further research
Material needed: Trial-specific time, frequency, intensity, technique instruction, pole fitting, attendance and control exposure are needed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on Sessions, frequency, intensity, pole fitting and adherence must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Sessions, frequency, intensity, pole fitting and adherence is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R01 R02 R03 R04

N16 · Are all active exercise controls equivalent?

Current findings
The original account distinguishes different exercise controls. An active-exercise label alone does not make them the same comparator or question.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
Comparator-specific content, exercise dose, contact time and supervision are needed. Estimates from different comparisons are not copied or pooled.
Required materials and conditions
Standard rehabilitation, walking, treadmill, flexibility and relaxation
Materials to obtain first
Comparator-specific content, exercise dose, contact time and supervision are needed. Estimates from different comparisons are not copied or pooled.
Further research
Material needed: Comparator-specific content, exercise dose, contact time and supervision are needed. Estimates from different comparisons are not copied or pooled. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on Standard rehabilitation, walking, treadmill, flexibility and relaxation must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Standard rehabilitation, walking, treadmill, flexibility and relaxation is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R01 R02 R03 R04

N17 · Were medication, medication timing and concurrent rehabilitation matched?

Current findings
The original safety narrative mentions medication-timing assessment, but the summary lacks trial-specific medication changes and ON/OFF state at measurement.
Verification status
Unverified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
Group medications, concurrent exercise and rehabilitation, medication timing, changes and withdrawal reasons are needed. Missing records are not treated as matched care.
Required materials and conditions
Group-specific concurrent care and medication state
Materials to obtain first
Group medications, concurrent exercise and rehabilitation, medication timing, changes and withdrawal reasons are needed. Missing records are not treated as matched care.
Further research
Material needed: Group medications, concurrent exercise and rehabilitation, medication timing, changes and withdrawal reasons are needed. Missing records are not treated as matched care. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on Group-specific concurrent care and medication state must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Group-specific concurrent care and medication state is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R01 R02 R03 R04

N18 · How do total samples differ from analysis denominators?

Current findings
Reuter's 90 participants and 3 arms, Monteiro's 33 participants and 8 weeks with 32 completers in the citation, Szefler-Derela's 40 participants and 6 weeks, and Cugusi's 20-person pilot are distinguished.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
Group allocation, completion, assessment and analysis counts, missing-data handling and ITT materials are needed. Differences and totals are not newly calculated or summed.
Required materials and conditions
Allocated, completed and endpoint-specific analysis samples
Materials to obtain first
Group allocation, completion, assessment and analysis counts, missing-data handling and ITT materials are needed. Differences and totals are not newly calculated or summed.
Further research
Material needed: Group allocation, completion, assessment and analysis counts, missing-data handling and ITT materials are needed. Differences and totals are not newly calculated or summed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on Allocated, completed and endpoint-specific analysis samples must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Allocated, completed and endpoint-specific analysis samples is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R01 R02 R03 R04

N19 · What is known about randomization and masking?

Current findings
The stored evidence labels randomized trials, with single masking for Monteiro and lack of masking plus multiple endpoints for Reuter. Actual masking by role remains unverified.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
Sequence generation, concealment, masking roles and maintenance, missingness, deviations and measurement procedures are needed. No new official RoB2 assessment is executed.
Required materials and conditions
Allocation, concealment, assessors, deviations and measurement
Materials to obtain first
Sequence generation, concealment, masking roles and maintenance, missingness, deviations and measurement procedures are needed. No new official RoB2 assessment is executed.
Further research
Material needed: Sequence generation, concealment, masking roles and maintenance, missingness, deviations and measurement procedures are needed. No new official RoB2 assessment is executed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on Allocation, concealment, assessors, deviations and measurement must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Allocation, concealment, assessors, deviations and measurement is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R01 R02 R03 R04

N20 · How do shared reports link to original trials?

Current findings
Parent 3014 and its subclaims share reports. There are 3 original evidence entries and 4 citations; Cugusi is a bibliographic summary without a separate evidence entry.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
Author, institution, recruitment-period, registration and cohort links are needed. Report slots and sheets are not certified as unique trials, participants or independent replications.
Required materials and conditions
Report, cohort and participant overlap
Materials to obtain first
Author, institution, recruitment-period, registration and cohort links are needed. Report slots and sheets are not certified as unique trials, participants or independent replications.
Further research
Material needed: Author, institution, recruitment-period, registration and cohort links are needed. Report slots and sheets are not certified as unique trials, participants or independent replications. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on Report, cohort and participant overlap must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Report, cohort and participant overlap is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R01 R02 R03 R04

N21 · Were registration and prespecified plans actually read?

Current findings
Original evidence records registration as unverified; only the narrative of UPDRS-III as prespecified primary is retained. External registration and plans remain unread.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
Trial registration, change histories, protocols, SAPs and prespecified analyses are needed. Unverified registration is not asserted to be absent.
Required materials and conditions
Registration, protocols, SAPs and endpoint hierarchy
Materials to obtain first
Trial registration, change histories, protocols, SAPs and prespecified analyses are needed. Unverified registration is not asserted to be absent.
Further research
Material needed: Trial registration, change histories, protocols, SAPs and prespecified analyses are needed. Unverified registration is not asserted to be absent. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on Registration, protocols, SAPs and endpoint hierarchy must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Registration, protocols, SAPs and endpoint hierarchy is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R01 R02 R03 R04

N22 · How were multiple endpoints and selective reporting handled?

Current findings
The parent records small samples, lack of masking, multiple endpoints and selected functional signals. The primary endpoint and other outcomes are not combined at the same evidential level.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
Original endpoint lists, analysis order, time points, multiplicity handling and complete results are needed. Selected positive findings are not expanded into recovery of every function.
Required materials and conditions
Prespecified hierarchy, multiplicity and complete results
Materials to obtain first
Original endpoint lists, analysis order, time points, multiplicity handling and complete results are needed. Selected positive findings are not expanded into recovery of every function.
Further research
Material needed: Original endpoint lists, analysis order, time points, multiplicity handling and complete results are needed. Selected positive findings are not expanded into recovery of every function. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on Prespecified hierarchy, multiplicity and complete results must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Prespecified hierarchy, multiplicity and complete results is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R01 R02 R03 R04

N23 · Are funding, equipment, affiliation and analysis involvement separated?

Current findings
Specific Reuter funding is unverified. Monteiro records public funding and supplied poles; Szefler-Derela records no external funding and 1 author employed by Novartis. Cugusi funding remains unverified.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
Disclosures on funding, equipment, company affiliation and COI, and design, analysis and publication involvement are needed. Public funding or no external funding does not certify absence of other involvement.
Required materials and conditions
Separate checks of company involvement
Materials to obtain first
Disclosures on funding, equipment, company affiliation and COI, and design, analysis and publication involvement are needed. Public funding or no external funding does not certify absence of other involvement.
Further research
Material needed: Disclosures on funding, equipment, company affiliation and COI, and design, analysis and publication involvement are needed. Public funding or no external funding does not certify absence of other involvement. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on Separate checks of company involvement must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Separate checks of company involvement is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R01 R02 R03 R04

N24 · What do the fall and injury records mean?

Current findings
Falls in the 6-month trial were 4 with Nordic walking, 4 with ordinary walking and 1 with flexibility and relaxation. The original also records sprains, shoulder pain and heat-related hypotension.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
Active collection, severity, repeated events versus affected people, harm denominators, exposure and causality are needed. Event records are not calculated as incidence rates or fall-prevention effects.
Required materials and conditions
Harm events, affected people, exposure and denominators
Materials to obtain first
Active collection, severity, repeated events versus affected people, harm denominators, exposure and causality are needed. Event records are not calculated as incidence rates or fall-prevention effects.
Further research
Material needed: Active collection, severity, repeated events versus affected people, harm denominators, exposure and causality are needed. Event records are not calculated as incidence rates or fall-prevention effects. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on Harm events, affected people, exposure and denominators must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Harm events, affected people, exposure and denominators is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R01 R02 R03 R04

N25 · Are safety boundaries for vulnerable patients established?

Current findings
The original safety narrative states that poles do not correct freezing or orthostatic hypotension and records the need for professional assessment and a fall-prevention plan.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
Vulnerable-patient eligibility and exclusions, assistance, supervision, stopping criteria and harms by medication state are needed. No new individual-care instructions or universal safety certification are created.
Required materials and conditions
Freezing, impaired balance, orthostatic hypotension and supervision
Materials to obtain first
Vulnerable-patient eligibility and exclusions, assistance, supervision, stopping criteria and harms by medication state are needed. No new individual-care instructions or universal safety certification are created.
Further research
Material needed: Vulnerable-patient eligibility and exclusions, assistance, supervision, stopping criteria and harms by medication state are needed. No new individual-care instructions or universal safety certification are created. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on Freezing, impaired balance, orthostatic hypotension and supervision must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Freezing, impaired balance, orthostatic hypotension and supervision is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R01 R02 R03 R04

N26 · What is known about post-training durability and harms?

Current findings
Training lasting weeks to 6 months is not post-training durability evidence. The separate subclaim leaves fall prevention and post-training durability unestablished.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
Independent post-training follow-up, maintenance exercise, adherence, falls, injuries, rare harms and group denominators are needed.
Required materials and conditions
During-training duration versus post-training follow-up
Materials to obtain first
Independent post-training follow-up, maintenance exercise, adherence, falls, injuries, rare harms and group denominators are needed.
Further research
Material needed: Independent post-training follow-up, maintenance exercise, adherence, falls, injuries, rare harms and group denominators are needed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on During-training duration versus post-training follow-up must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on During-training duration versus post-training follow-up is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R01 R02 R03 R04

N27 · How does stored-summary reading differ from external-original reading?

Current findings
The complete stored parent JSON was read. Historical citation-verification narratives and cross-check records are retained; external abstracts, full texts, registration, protocols and SAPs remain unread.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
Acquisition, access and reading histories for originals are needed. A URL is not promoted into actual full-text reading, successful access or completed content review.
Required materials and conditions
Actual reading of summaries, abstracts, full texts, registration and plans
Materials to obtain first
Acquisition, access and reading histories for originals are needed. A URL is not promoted into actual full-text reading, successful access or completed content review.
Further research
Material needed: Acquisition, access and reading histories for originals are needed. A URL is not promoted into actual full-text reading, successful access or completed content review. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on Actual reading of summaries, abstracts, full texts, registration and plans must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Actual reading of summaries, abstracts, full texts, registration and plans is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R01 R02 R03 R04

N28 · How do bilingual wording and representative facets relate?

Current findings
Parent Korean, English and facets are retained. The representative 90-person, 6-month record is not used as a common value for the 40-person, 6-week or 33-person, 8-week comparisons.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
Report-specific recruitment, programs, time points, endpoints and original terminology are needed. English translation is not labeled external English full-text verification.
Required materials and conditions
Trial-specific populations, durations and comparisons
Materials to obtain first
Report-specific recruitment, programs, time points, endpoints and original terminology are needed. English translation is not labeled external English full-text verification.
Further research
Material needed: Report-specific recruitment, programs, time points, endpoints and original terminology are needed. English translation is not labeled external English full-text verification. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on Trial-specific populations, durations and comparisons must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Trial-specific populations, durations and comparisons is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R01 R02 R03 R04

N29 · How do selected C and parent C54 differ?

Current findings
Selected C has no individual score, status or axes. Parent C54, Caution and B/P/R1/I2/E+/B2/CX remain parent context; the lower C narrative for the pole question is not converted into a new score.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
The selected-to-parent application boundary and original values must be preserved. No new grade, score or independent clinical certification is created.
Required materials and conditions
Selected grade versus parent score, axes and safety label
Materials to obtain first
The selected-to-parent application boundary and original values must be preserved. No new grade, score or independent clinical certification is created.
Further research
Material needed: The selected-to-parent application boundary and original values must be preserved. No new grade, score or independent clinical certification is created. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on Selected grade versus parent score, axes and safety label must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Selected grade versus parent score, axes and safety label is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R01 R02 R03 R04

N30 · How are evidence dates, production and correction events separated?

Current findings
The existing evidence date 2026-09-07, empty corrections array and empty deliberation string are retained. The production date does not replace them as a new evidence-verification date.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Complete stored parent Korean and English summary, selected question and bibliography read; external abstracts, full text, registration, protocols and analysis plans unread
Why unverified
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence.
Reason for missing information
Material additions, condition revisions and verdict changes must remain separate events. Corrections or new evidence absent from the original are not invented.
Required materials and conditions
Original evidence date, empty corrections and update records
Materials to obtain first
Material additions, condition revisions and verdict changes must remain separate events. Corrections or new evidence absent from the original are not invented.
Further research
Material needed: Material additions, condition revisions and verdict changes must remain separate events. Corrections or new evidence absent from the original are not invented. This records needed materials; no new research was executed.
Remaining uncertainty
Target effects, endpoint-specific denominators, measurement, prespecified hierarchy, bias, externally validated important differences, durability, harms, independence and overlap remain unverified. Original numbers, historical verification narratives and registration identifiers are not promoted into new calculations, completed content review or clinical certification.
Conditions for verification
Original material on Original evidence date, empty corrections and update records must link to the same program, control, endpoint, time point and denominators, distinguishing other exercise comparisons, parent context and unread external material.
Why this condition is needed
Material on Original evidence date, empty corrections and update records is needed to connect the selected program with population, training, controls, endpoints, time points, denominators, precision and harm boundaries.
Application exceptions
Selected C and absent individual score, status and axes are retained, distinguishing parent C54, separate pole-question C and fall-and-durability D. Different controls, durations, endpoints and denominators are not mixed; median differences, CIs, new totals, grades or individual-care guidance are not created.
Referenced methods
Preserved principles distinguishing questions, direct comparisons, reports and trials, endpoints, denominators, precision and harms informed production.

Related sources R01 R02 R03 R04