| 1 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N01 · Evidence conditionWhich hypertrophy-gain claim is being checked?Required |
The selected question concerns attenuated hypertrophy gains with repeated cold immersion. The parent covers hypertrophy/strength adaptation together; the other subclaim concerns muscle loss or impairment of every strength outcome. This sheet preserves the selected gain question. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Selected subclaim and boundaries with other outcomes |
Material needed: Original subclaim record and hypertrophy endpoint plans. Muscle loss, all strength outcomes and acute recovery remain distinct. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 2 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N02 · Evidence conditionIs subclaim D distinct from parent grade D with 28 points?Required |
The selected subclaim is D, with a note that two small trials supported an adverse E- direction. Score/status are absent. Parent grade D with 28 points and adverse-direction explanation are parent context, not a new subclaim score or a null-result verdict. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Original grade, direction and absent values |
Material needed: Original verdict, direction, subclaim records and correction material. Parent values do not fill absent subclaim values. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 3 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N03 · Evidence conditionWhich trainees provide the hypertrophy data?Required |
The main trial concerns resistance-trained young men. Population details of the separate Fyfe trial of 16 participants are absent from the summary. Report-specific age, training history, exclusions and disease/sex range are unverified. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Population, training history and baseline conditions |
Material needed: Original population, exclusion, training-history and baseline nutrition/disease tables. A representative population is not assigned to every report. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 4 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N04 · Evidence conditionWhat were the original repeated-cold-immersion specifications?Required |
Main-trial specifications are 10°C for 10 minutes within 10 minutes after training, repeated 2 times weekly. Actual temperature variation, immersion extent, adherence, interruptions and exposure-specific effects are unverified. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Cold exposure specifications and actual adherence |
Material needed: Exposure specifications, actual temperature, adherence and interruption records. Research specifications are not new cold-water instructions. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 5 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N05 · Evidence conditionHow do training region, repetition and duration differ?Required |
Roberts records 12 weeks of lower-body resistance training 2 times weekly. Fyfe bibliography concerns whole-body training; the evidence summary records 7 weeks with passive rest as control. Load, progression, components, adherence and muscle-specific details are unverified. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Training programs and outcome timing |
Material needed: Training protocols, load/progression, adherence and measurement times. Different programs are not combined as the same exposure. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 6 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N06 · Evidence conditionWhat comparison does active recovery provide?Required |
Roberts control is 10 minutes of low-intensity cycling as active recovery, rather than passive rest. This compares gains during the same training; active recovery's separate contribution and matching of contact/nutrition/load are unverified. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Roberts control and accompanying management |
Material needed: Control specifications, activity/contact and shared training/nutrition records. Active recovery is not substituted for passive rest. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 7 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N07 · Evidence conditionWhat are the passive-rest control and different cold specifications?Required |
The separate trial of 16 participants compared 10°C for 15 minutes with indoor rest at 23°C over 7 weeks. This differs from Roberts 10-minute/active-recovery comparison; contact, rest, adherence/load details are unverified. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Fyfe intervention, control and duration |
Material needed: Fyfe intervention, control, adherence, training and original outcome tables. Temperatures, times and controls remain report-specific. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 8 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N08 · Evidence conditionWhat outcome is MRI quadriceps gain?Required |
Roberts endpoints are MRI quadriceps gain and strength. The selected question links to MRI gain; measurement/derivation procedures, assessors, muscle-region details and arm-specific analysis denominators are unverified. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
MRI measurement and change derivation |
Material needed: Original MRI tables, measurement/derivation procedures, baseline/end values and denominators. These are not converted into other muscles or strength outcomes. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 9 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N09 · Evidence conditionWhat are the arm-specific gains and P value?Required |
Original results are active recovery 309±73 g versus CWI 103±71 g, difference -206 g/P<.001. These are preserved original values; the meaning of ±, exact arm analysis denominators and CIs are unverified. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Original MRI values, difference and uncertainty |
Material needed: Original MRI outcome tables, legends, tests, denominators and intervals. ± is not read as a CI and no new difference is calculated. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 10 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N10 · Evidence conditionWhat original record contains d=-4.1?Required |
The parent explanation records MRI gain difference -206 g, d=-4.1 and P<.001. The definition/derivation of d, arm denominators, intervals and adjustment are unverified in the current summary. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Definition and derivation of the original effect size |
Material needed: Original effect derivation, models, intervals and denominators. No new d or CI is estimated. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 11 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N11 · Evidence conditionWere 95% CIs and prospective primary hierarchy verified?Required |
The original explanation lists unverified prospective primary hierarchy and 95% CIs as limitations. Representative MRI-gain/strength endpoint labels do not certify prospective hierarchy. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Prospective hierarchy, intervals and sample-size rationale |
Material needed: Registration, protocols, SAPs, original intervals and sample-size rationale. Metadata and verification of prospective plans remain distinct. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 12 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N12 · Evidence conditionHow does less gain differ from muscle loss?Required |
The original records muscle gains in both groups, including 103 g in the cold group. -206 g compares gains during the same training; it is not muscle loss from baseline. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Change from baseline and between-group comparison |
Material needed: Original baseline, end/change tables and analysis scope. Smaller gains are not converted into negative change from baseline. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 13 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N13 · Evidence conditionIs type II hypertrophy the same as MRI grams?Required |
Fyfe endpoints are muscle-fiber area and strength, with less type II hypertrophy reported. Preserve the original directional support; exact original values, units, effects/CIs, analysis denominators and other fiber outcomes are unverified. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Fiber area versus MRI |
Material needed: Original fiber tables, measurement/derivation, regions and denominators/CIs. Fiber area is not converted into MRI grams. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 14 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N14 · Evidence conditionHow do maximum-strength outcomes differ from hypertrophy?Required |
The original records no clear attenuation of maximum-strength gains in Fyfe; the preserved summary describes a null maximum-strength difference. Strength findings differ across trials, and detailed measures, estimates and CIs are unverified. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Strength-specific results and disagreement |
Material needed: Original tables, models, denominators and intervals for each strength measure. Null results do not establish 0 effect, equivalence or impairment of all strength outcomes. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 15 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N15 · Evidence conditionDoes acute anabolic signaling replace longer-term hypertrophy?Required |
Both paper titles mention anabolic signaling, but stored evidence summaries concern longer-term MRI, fiber and strength outcomes. Exact acute-marker values, times, samples and relationships to longer-term populations are unverified. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Linkage of acute/longer-term outcomes and samples |
Material needed: Within-report acute/longer-term distinctions, sample/timing and identity material. Titles alone do not create acute values or new trials. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 16 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N16 · Evidence conditionAre perceived recovery/soreness and hypertrophy the same goal?Required |
The original distinguishes acute recovery, soreness/perceived recovery and longer-term adaptation. Verdict 1247 identifies a different question; its material was not read in this work. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Boundaries between acute recovery and longer-term adaptation |
Material needed: Outcome definitions, timing and cohort material for the same/different questions. Acute recovery is not transferred into hypertrophy benefit. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 17 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N17 · Evidence conditionWhich stage does the assigned count of 24 describe?Required |
Roberts records 24 assigned/21 completed. Arm assignment denominators, recruitment/eligibility/exclusions and exact sequence-generation/concealment procedures are unverified. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Recruitment/allocation flow and procedures |
Material needed: Arm-specific flowcharts, allocation/recruitment and procedures. Overall counts are not automatically assigned as arm or endpoint denominators. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 18 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N18 · Evidence conditionAre 21 completers linked to measurement-specific denominators?Required |
The original lists complete-case analysis as a limitation and records 21 completers. Arm denominators, exclusions, interruptions/missingness for MRI, strength and acute analyses are separately unverified. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Complete-case analysis and outcome denominators |
Material needed: Arm denominators, flow and exclusions in original MRI/strength tables. Completer counts do not replace every outcome's analysis denominator. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 19 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N19 · Evidence conditionWere withdrawal causes kept distinct from cold-induced harm?Required |
Original safety wording did not attribute unrelated-injury withdrawal to cold immersion. Arm-specific withdrawal, exact causes/timing, observation loss and analysis handling are unverified. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Injury/withdrawal causes and timing |
Material needed: Flowcharts, injury/withdrawal causes, timing and analysis handling. No new attrition counts/rates or causal judgment are created. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 20 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N20 · Evidence conditionAre 16 participants the fiber/strength denominators?Required |
Fyfe records 16 participants. Arm assignment/completion, fiber/strength analysis denominators and missing biopsy/measurement data and their handling are unverified. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Fyfe flow and measurement-specific denominators |
Material needed: Flow, measurement denominators, missing data and analyses. Overall sample size does not replace all endpoint denominators. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 21 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N21 · Evidence conditionWhat do completer, assigned and actual-use analyses estimate?Required |
Roberts complete-case analysis is recorded. Full-assignment analysis, baseline/load/nutrition adjustment, missingness/sensitivity, actual-exposure estimates and Fyfe analysis details are unverified. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Analysis populations, missingness and sensitivity |
Material needed: SAPs, actual models, analysis populations and missingness/sensitivity material. No new analysis or adjustment is executed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 22 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N22 · Evidence conditionHow were MRI, biopsy and strength assessed?Required |
MRI, fiber-area and strength measurement names are present, but measurement/derivation procedures, repetition, assessor/analyst allocation awareness, standardization and reliability are unverified. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Measurement, allocation awareness and reliability |
Material needed: Measurement procedures, assessor/analyst records and repetition/reliability. Measurement names alone do not certify blinding or precision. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 23 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N23 · Evidence conditionAre contributions of nutrition products, diet and training management known?Required |
Roberts records in-kind nutrition products from Body Science. Actual products, intake/arm distribution, diet/nutrition, training load and observational control are unverified. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Nutrition, load, adherence and shared management |
Material needed: Nutrition, supplements, training/adherence and shared-management records. Product provision does not establish matched intake or a separate effect. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 24 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N24 · Evidence conditionHow does an absent registration field differ from prospective endpoint verification?Required |
Both original evidence summaries lack registration-identifier fields. The explanation explicitly notes unverified prospective primary hierarchy. Registration identity/content, timing relative to recruitment, changes and protocols are unverified and were not accessed. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Registration identity, content, timing and plans |
Material needed: Registration, protocols, SAPs and changes linked to the papers. An absent field does not establish no registration or prospective verification. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 25 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N25 · Evidence conditionHow are longer-term, acute and multiple outcomes in the same report linked?Required |
Roberts and Fyfe have separate preserved bibliographies. Multiple outcomes, acute/longer-term sample relationships and related-report overlap are unverified. Support from two small trials is original wording, not new independence certification. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Overlap across reports, cohorts and outcomes |
Material needed: Registration, recruitment dates and report/cohort/outcome identity. Multiple outcomes or both sheets are not summed as new participants or independent trials. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 26 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N26 · Evidence conditionWhat verification level applies to support, interests and original I1?Required |
Roberts records public/university support and Body Science in-kind nutrition products; Fyfe records public sport/university support. Parent mixed-support wording and I1 are historical values; detailed roles, interests, involvement/independence are unverified. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Support, in-kind provision, company roles and historical values |
Material needed: Support/interest declarations, product distribution, affiliations and investigator roles. No new absence of company-employed authors or analysis/publication involvement is established. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 27 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N27 · Evidence conditionCan two supportive directions generalize to every exposure/population?Required |
The original note describes two small trials supporting the direction, but MRI gains and type II area differ. Active/passive controls, duration, training and exposure also differ; maximum-strength disagreement is preserved. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Directness of measures, controls, training and exposure |
Material needed: Condition-specific original tables, measurements/comparisons and identity material. Different supportive directions are not calculated as one pooled effect. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 28 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N28 · Evidence conditionWhat persists after exposure and under other conditions?Required |
Original material concerns 12 and 7 weeks of training. Post-training recovery/persistence, other temperatures/timing/frequencies and subgroup effects are unverified. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Post-training outcomes, other exposures and subgroups |
Material needed: Original post-training, other-exposure and subgroup data. No sustained effect beyond original durations is created. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 29 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N29 · Evidence conditionDo hypertrophy measures answer medical-injury or disease-safety questions?Required |
The original calls smaller hypertrophy gains adverse to that training goal while separately leaving medical adverse-event rates and safety across diseases unverified. MRI gains/fiber measures are not direct medical-harm data. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Adverse training-goal adaptation versus medical harm |
Material needed: Separate harm/disease-population reports, exposure, events and denominators. Goal-related disadvantage is not converted into medical-harm incidence. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 30 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N30 · Evidence conditionWhat material was actually read here?Required |
The complete parent JSON was read and preserved byte for byte. Bibliographies/summaries for both reports were read; external abstracts, full texts, registration, planning and support materials remain unread. No external links/access were attempted. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Reading scope of stored summaries and external originals |
Material needed: Report-specific abstracts, full texts, registration/plans, original tables, support material and actual reading records. Bibliography/PMCID presence does not mean full-text reading. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 31 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N31 · Evidence conditionAre historical verification and current production/review distinct?Required |
The original evidence date is 2026-09-07, the correction array is empty and the deliberation note an empty string. Parent historical verification of longer-term trials, MRI, strength and funding does not establish completed content review in this work. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Original evidence date, corrections and historical checks |
Material needed: Complete actual correction/evidence-update records. Original dates are not production/review dates and do not certify no external corrections. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 32 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N32 · Evidence conditionWere gain/loss boundaries in both original languages preserved?Required |
The selected English claim concerns attenuated hypertrophy gains with repeated cold immersion. The parent distinguishes less muscle gain from muscle loss and limits the strength claim. Detailed translation checks against external papers were not performed. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Correspondence of original languages and scope |
Material needed: Complete needed original reports, translations and corrections. Original bilingual distinctions do not create new verification or broader claims. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 33 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N33 · Evidence conditionHow are parent axes and absent subclaim values retained?Required |
Parent axes are B/S/R1/I1/E-/B2/CX, with derived grade D. Four false flags and empty override reasons are also original values. Separate selected-subclaim score, status and axes are absent. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Original axes and selected-field boundaries |
Material needed: Actual axis/subclaim-record correction material. Parent axes/scores do not fill absent subclaim values. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 34 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N34 · Evidence conditionWhich medical adverse events were collected?Supplementary; required for extending medical safety conclusions |
Original safety is Caution and medical adverse-event rates are explicitly unverified. Actual harm definitions, collection/assessors and original event tables are unverified. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Harm definitions, collection, assessment and original events |
Material needed: Harm definitions, collection and withdrawal/event tables. Caution does not establish actual incidence, no harm or safety certification. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 35 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N35 · Evidence conditionHow do exposure, injury, interruption and follow-up times differ?Supplementary; required for extending medical safety conclusions |
The 12-/7-week training exposure durations are preserved. Actual harm timing, recovery/interruption, post-training follow-up and temporal order of injuries are unverified. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Exposure duration versus event/follow-up time |
Material needed: Exposure, event, interruption and later timelines. Training duration is not substituted for harm follow-up duration. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 36 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N36 · Evidence conditionWere harms compared equally with active/passive controls?Supplementary; required for extending medical safety conclusions |
Active recovery and passive rest controls are preserved. Matched harm collection, observation periods and original direct medical-risk comparisons by arm are unverified. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Arm-specific harm collection, duration and direct comparison |
Material needed: Arm-specific harm collection, periods and withdrawal/event tables. A control arm alone does not establish matched collection or a direct risk comparison. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 37 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N37 · Evidence conditionWhat are harm event counts and exposure/observation denominators?Supplementary; required for extending medical safety conclusions |
Preserve original 24 assigned/21 completed and the separate 16 participants. Medical-harm event counts, exposure/observation denominators and arm-specific interruptions are unverified. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Original medical-harm events and denominators |
Material needed: Original harm tables, actual exposure/observation flow and interruptions. Trial counts do not establish harm denominators or 0 events. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 38 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N38 · Evidence conditionAre injury, training load, nutrition and exposure causality distinguished?Supplementary; required for extending medical safety conclusions |
The original did not attribute unrelated-injury withdrawal to cold exposure. Detailed training load, nutrition, baseline disease and injury/exposure timing and causal assessment are unverified. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Baseline risk, accompanying management and causal assessment |
Material needed: Injury timing, training/nutrition, baseline risks and causal-assessment records. No new medical causality is established. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 39 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N39 · Evidence conditionAre interruptions/withdrawals linked to missing harm data?Supplementary; required for extending medical safety conclusions |
Complete-case analysis and original unrelated-injury withdrawal wording are present. Arm-specific interruptions, lost harm collection, selective reporting and subsequent follow-up are unverified. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Interruption, data loss, selective reporting and follow-up |
Material needed: Interruption/withdrawal reasons, harm records, follow-up and published tables. Missing data do not establish no harm. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 40 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N40 · Evidence conditionWhat independent, disease-population or later harm material is available?Supplementary; required for extending medical safety conclusions |
The original separately leaves safety across diseases unverified. Independent medical-harm, vulnerable-population and post-training event material for the same exposure is unverified in the current preserved scope. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Direct medical-harm evidence and other populations |
Material needed: Related harm/disease-population, exposure/collection/denominator and later material. No safety or risk certification beyond the original scope is created. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 41 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N41 · Evidence conditionAre conditions, method copies, application and review separate?Required |
The 5 method HTML snapshots, family conditions and quality contract are linked as preserved copies. Condition saving/freezing and separate application are distinct; content/model/boundary review is not marked complete. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Condition freezing, observations and change records |
Material needed: Complete new reports, registration, corrections and original tables, plus full prior originals, condition versions, application and review records. Material additions, condition revisions and verdict changes remain separate events. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |