CHAMGAP

Home balance-board training × Same-ankle recurrence over one year — Events, exposure, adherence and gaps

Select a review item to see its details.
Required evidence, verification status and materials actually read
ItemAVerification statusBReading scopeCReview itemDCurrent findingsEWhy unverifiedFRequired materials and conditionsGFurther research
1 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N01 · Evidence conditionWhich original one-year recurrence claim is selected?Required
The selected claim is reduced same-ankle recurrence over one year, original subclaim grade B, with the note 22% versus 33%/NNT 9. Absent subclaim score/status/axes are preserved separately from parent B with 76 points and axes.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Selected subclaim wording/grade versus parent context
Materials needed: Exact same-ankle recurrence definition, population/comparator, duration/denominators and user boundary review. Parent scores do not fill the subclaim score. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
2 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N02 · Evidence conditionWhich previous-sprain population was studied?Required
2BFit randomized 522 athletes aged 12–70. The original intervention was home training after usual care following ankle sprain. Injury severity, recovery/start criteria, sports/comorbidities are not established in detail by the summary.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Athletes aged 12–70 after ankle sprain
Materials needed: Eligibility/exclusions, previous sprain/severity, usual care, training start, exposure and direct other-population data. Do not extend to all ankle disorders/app users. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
3 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N03 · Evidence conditionWhat was the specific delivery approach?Required
The original was eight weeks of home neuromuscular training supplying a balance board, exercise sheets, DVD and web materials. Do not simplify into the board’s isolated-component effect, all ankle exercise or app effects.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Eight-week program with balance board, exercise sheets, DVD and web materials
Materials needed: Components, support/contact, training content, adherence, actual products and direct comparisons of delivery approaches. No device/app recommendations or exercise instructions. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
4 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N04 · Evidence conditionWhat were usual-care comparison and concurrent treatment?Required
Original design was a multicentre randomized usual-care-controlled trial; effects concern adding an eight-week program after usual care. Actual concurrent bracing, physiotherapy, medication, return-to-sport/exposure in both arms remain unverified.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Additional training after usual care
Materials needed: Original usual care, additional training/other exposure, contact, contamination and recovery/return criteria in both arms. Do not repurpose effects to no treatment/other comparators. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
5 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N05 · Evidence conditionAre training duration/study exposure separated from use instructions?Required
Original study facts record three sessions weekly, up to 30 minutes each, for eight weeks. Preserve study-exposure identity only; do not calculate total sessions/time or create exercise/rehabilitation/prevention instructions.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Original eight weeks, three times weekly, up to 30 minutes
Materials needed: Original actual training, adherence/stopping, support/contact and phase-specific exposure. No certification of identical effects for other durations/intensities. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
6 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N06 · Evidence conditionAre eight-week training and one-year outcomes separated?Required
Intervention lasted eight weeks and same-ankle recurrence follow-up lasted 12 months. Maintenance training after completion, follow-up exposure/stopping and visit-specific observation remain unverified in detail. Training and event-observation periods do not become the same denominator.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Intervention duration versus 12-month recurrence follow-up
Materials needed: Original actual training/maintenance, follow-up schedules, observation duration/loss and sports exposure. Do not calculate new day counts/exercise amounts from one year. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
7 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N07 · Evidence conditionWhat are randomization and recurrence numerators?Required
The original records 522 randomized (256/266) and 56/256 (22%) versus 89/266 (33%). Separately retain relationships among people, ankles, recurrence events, repeated reports and time; do not calculate additional event/participant totals.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
522 participants, 256/266, original recurrence 56/89
Materials needed: Endpoint-numerator definitions, arm analysis/follow-up/observed denominators, repeated-recurrence handling and original flow tables. Do not copy numerators/denominators to all other endpoints/trials. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
8 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N08 · Evidence conditionHow was same-ankle recurrence defined?Required
The original endpoint was same-ankle recurrence reported monthly and independently adjudicated under masking. Diagnostic/injury/recurrence criteria, first/all-repeated-event handling and clinical-confirmation details remain unverified. Do not extend to the opposite ankle/all injuries.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Original event label, first/repeated events and confirmation
Materials needed: Event definitions, original questionnaires, adjudication rules, repeated/contralateral events, severity and confirmation data. Materials clarifying aggregation of original numerators 56/89. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
9 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N09 · Evidence conditionAre self-reporting and masked adjudication separated?Required
The original records monthly self-reports followed by independent adjudication by a masked physiotherapist and researcher. Initial reporting was self-reported and participant masking impossible. Do not add a declaration that all reports were confirmed through testing/clinical visits.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Initial monthly reporting versus independent physiotherapist/researcher adjudication
Materials needed: Original reporting/missingness, disagreement/adjudication, assessor masking, objective confirmation and participant expectations. No formal RoB assessment in this production. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
10 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N10 · Evidence conditionAre recurrent people, repeated events and observations separated?Required
Preserve original 56/256, 89/266 and monthly reporting. Exact aggregation of at-least-one recurrence, first/all-repeated events and same-person bilateral-ankle/report relationships remains unverified. Monthly/repeated events are not new independent participants.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Original numerators and people/ankle/event units
Materials needed: Original event aggregation, person/ankle identifiers, repeat handling, analysis units and observation periods. No additional participant/event counts or new incidence-rate calculations. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
11 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N11 · Evidence conditionWhich comparison do adjusted RR/CI/NNT describe?Required
Original adjusted RR 0.63 (95% CI 0.45–0.88) and NNT 9 concern 2BFit same-ankle recurrence over one year. Do not copy to app/bracing or time-loss/cost endpoints. Original adjusted-model/estimand details remain unverified.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
2BFit one-year recurrence effects
Materials needed: Original models/adjustment variables, effects/CI, NNT definition/denominators and estimands. No new RR/RRR/NNT/CI recalculation or invented examples. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
12 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N12 · Evidence conditionAre original absolute difference and arm percentages distinguished?Required
The original crux/rationale records 22% versus 33% and absolute recurrence difference −11 percentage points. Do not transfer to within-arm improvement, relative effects, other ankles/apps or calculate exact unrounded values/new absolute differences.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
22% versus 33% and original −11 percentage points
Materials needed: Original arm denominators/rounding, effect definitions, adjusted/unadjusted results and duration/analysis data. Do not newly convert RR and absolute differences into one another. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
13 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N13 · Evidence conditionAre exposure-time incidence density and one-year risk identical?Required
Original study facts record incidence density 1.86 versus 2.90 per 1,000 ankle-exposure hours. These differ in units from 22% versus 33% with person denominators. Do not calculate actual total exposure hours, new event counts/incidence-density ratios.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
1.86 versus 2.90 per 1,000 hours
Materials needed: Actual arm sports exposure, recording/missingness, incidence-density numerators/denominators and models/CI. Distinguish time, people and ankle units. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
14 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N14 · Evidence conditionAre time-loss and cost/productivity outcomes retained separately?Required
The original rationale records time-loss recurrence RR 0.53 and medical-cost/productivity-loss recurrence RR 0.25 in the same direction. Definitions, numerators/denominators, CI/times/models remain unverified in detail. Do not copy primary RR 0.63/CI or NNT 9.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Other recurrence outcomes, RR 0.53 and 0.25
Materials needed: Original endpoint tables, event/cost definitions, denominators, effects/CI and hierarchy/multiplicity. No new calculations/addition beyond original numbers. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
15 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N15 · Evidence conditionAre adherence, comparator contamination and attrition retained together?Required
Preserve original full adherence 58/256 (23%), comparator contamination 5/266 (2%) and follow-up attrition 14%. Adherence definition, partial adherence and arm-specific loss/reasons remain unverified in detail. No adherer effects, new adherence differences/attrition counts/rates.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
58/25623%·5/2662%·14%
Materials needed: Adherence measurement, actual exposure, contamination/concurrent training, arm withdrawal/missingness and sensitivity analyses. Low adherence does not newly establish delivery effects/causality. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
16 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N16 · Evidence conditionDoes ITT certify resolution of completeness/missingness?Required
The original study description records all analyses following ITT principles alongside 14% attrition. ITT is not converted into universal completion/all-endpoint observation or zero missingness bias. Original B0 is parent-verdict context.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Analysis as randomized and actual missingness handling
Materials needed: Original arm flow, endpoint analysis/observation, missingness handling/assumptions, follow-up loss and sensitivity. No clinical calculations/formal risk assessment in this production. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
17 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N17 · Evidence conditionAre original randomization/prespecified-endpoint descriptions preserved?Required
The original records independent-researcher computer allocation, impossible participant masking/masked adjudication, ITT, and matching prespecified self-reported recurrence primary endpoint/ISRCTN34177180. Preserve original quotations/history only; no plan/procedure comparison now.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Independent-researcher computer allocation and recurrence primary endpoint/registration
Materials needed: Allocation concealment/implementation, plans/amendments, registration versions/public dates and original-report comparison. The unestablished first registration publication date does not newly establish prospective registration. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
18 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N18 · Evidence conditionAre 2023 app results mixed with 2BFit?Required
The original counterview records a primary-care app trial with 165 participants, null HR 1.14 (0.59–2.21), adherence 6.1%. Preserve the original scope that delivery differed from 2BFit supplying a board/DVD and was not counted as direct conflict. Citation/design details remain unidentified.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Different-delivery trial, 165 participants, HR 1.14
Materials needed: Exact app citations/registration, population/comparator/duration, endpoints/denominators/exposure/adherence, models and direct comparisons. Do not substitute app HR for board RR or effects of all apps. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
19 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N19 · Evidence conditionAre different bracing-trial/review results separated?Required
The original records 12-month bracing superior to eight-week training in the 2014 trial and no 12-month recurrence difference between training/bracing in a 2017 review. Populations, citations, denominators, effects and CI for both contexts remain unverified; no difference does not become equivalence.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
2014 bracing superiority and no difference in 2017
Materials needed: Each citation, original trials/review-included studies/overlap, exact comparators/durations and effects/CI/denominators. Do not count different research as new pooled effects/unique trial totals. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
20 Unverified Full text not readStored summary read N20 · Harm-information gaps supplementing the efficacy tableIs the separate exercise-harm reporting gap retained?Supplementary
The original safety description records that exercise-related adverse events were not collected/reported in a separate table and this trial cannot establish harmlessness. Preserve this reporting limitation; do not extend to zero AE or long-term safety.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Exercise-related AE collection/reporting versus harmlessness
Materials needed: Harm collection/definitions, arm actual training/exposure, events/discontinuation/relatedness/denominators and long-term data. No exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention instructions. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
21 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N21 · Evidence conditionWhat was actually read/identified?Required
The complete preserved parent summary was read for production and retained in the original archive. The single citation identifies 2BFit; three app/bracing/review entries are unidentified counterview contexts. All external abstracts/full texts/registration/plans remain unread.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Preserved summary/original citation versus unidentified reference contexts
Materials needed: Exact report citations/originals, acquisition/reading scope, versions/dates. URLs/historical quotations are not upgraded to current reading; no external-link/access testing. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
22 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N22 · Evidence conditionAre registration dates/prespecification treated as current certification?Required
Original evidence/Korean text describes matching ISRCTN34177180 with the self-reported recurrence primary endpoint. Original study facts say the first registration public date was unestablished, so prospective registration was not asserted. App/bracing/review registrations are unidentified.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
ISRCTN34177180 and unestablished first public date
Materials needed: Actual registration versions/publication, start/amendment timing and endpoints/plans. No guessed official URLs, new registration reading or prespecification certification. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
23 Unverified Full text not readStored summary read N23 · Evidence conditionWere protocol/SAP and estimand/missingness plans acquired?Required
Preserve original primary/ITT/allocation/adjudication descriptions and historical cross-checking. Each trial’s protocol/SAP, versions/timing and missingness/multiplicity/analysis plans were not acquired/read now.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Separate prespecified-plan/analysis/amendment materials
Materials needed: Original protocols/SAP, amendment histories, endpoints/models/people/events/exposure, missingness/sensitivity and public timing. Unread external materials do not establish document absence. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
24 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N24 · Evidence conditionAre public funding, board supply and company involvement separated?Required
2BFit had ZonMw grant 750-20-002, declarations of no financial benefit/competing interests and Avanco AB boards supplied to participants. Preserve the original limitation that manufacturer donation/funding/analysis/writing/publication support was not reported. Supply is not manufacturer donation; employee authors/roles and app/bracing/review funding remain unverified now.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
2BFit support versus unverified other contexts
Materials needed: Item-specific company funding, product support, employee authors, design/analysis/data control and other support for each study. I2 does not establish absence of every item or independence certification. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
25 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N25 · Evidence conditionAre specific positive effects, different-delivery null results and unverified details distinguished?Required
Positive 2BFit recurrence, null 2023 app HR, 2014 bracing superiority and no difference in the 2017 review concern different contexts. Separate original descriptions from unverified citation/effect/harm details; no new verdict on broad claims.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Question/comparison-specific results and reading status
Materials needed: Report-specific direct populations/interventions/comparators, endpoints/durations, effects/CI/denominators and actual access. Unread does not mean unreported; null does not mean zero effect/equivalence. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
26 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N26 · Evidence conditionAre one original citation and three reference contexts counted as unique trials?Required
Parent 2975 and its s0/s1 claims share original 2BFit citation/trial context and counterview mentions of the 2023 app, 2014 bracing and 2017 review. The same people, ankles, arms, events, times, citations, related sheets and review-included trials are not newly added as independent trials/participants. Four links comprise one identified paper and three unidentified contexts, including a 2017 review; they are not certification of four unique clinical trials or participant totals.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Document/context items versus trials/participants
Materials needed: Citations/registration, review-included reports/overlap, cohorts/analysis, endpoints/repetition relationships. Unique trial/participant totals remain unrecorded. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
27 Unverified Full text not readStored summary read N27 · Evidence conditionAre original single confirmation and independent replication distinguished?Supplementary
Preserve parent replication R1/independence I2 and the original single confirmatory-trial description. App/bracing/review contexts are not counted as new same-condition independent replication/conflicts or unique-trial certification.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Parent R1/I2 and comparison/delivery differences
Materials needed: Separate prespecified, direct population/delivery/comparator/events, effects/CI/denominators, funding/author relationships and overlap materials for the selected question. No search/independence determination now. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
28 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N28 · Evidence conditionAre the subclaim grade and parent score/axes preserved?Required
Preserve selected subclaim B/note/bilingual claims; absent subclaim score/status/axes remain unrecorded. Parent B with 76 points, unknown safety, B/H/R1/I2/E+/B0, unrecorded precision and true large-hard-endpoint RCT are parent context and do not fill subclaim values.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Selected B, absent subclaim values and parent B76
Materials needed: User subclaim/parent-boundary review and actual correction materials. No new score/grade or official RoB 2/GRADE certification. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
29 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N29 · Evidence conditionAre both languages, citations and absent fields preserved?Required
Preserve original parent bilingual quotations/descriptions, evidence, citations and axes and selected-subclaim values in the complete original archive. Classification fields are absent and no new original fields are filled. No English-paper comparison now.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Both original languages and absent separate classification information
Materials needed: User review of languages/terminology, event/exposure units, absences and selected scope. Distinguish production descriptions from original values. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
30 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N30 · Evidence conditionAre source dates/corrections/history separated from production dates?Required
Preserve original evidence date 2026-08-26, empty corrections/deliberation and verdict-decision cross-checking. Historical quotations/registration matching differ from current production, condition freezing/application and completed content review.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Original 2026-08-26 and new conditions/application
Materials needed: Update materials separating originals, events, conditions/observations and verdict decisions when new evidence/corrections arise. Historical wording is not completed clinical content review here. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production.
31 Unverified Full text not readStored summary read N31 · Evidence conditionWhat direct materials would fill the selected gaps?Supplementary
Specific 2BFit event/exposure, adherence/attrition, harms/reporting details require originals; app/bracing mentions do not substitute as identical effects.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Direct population/delivery/events, effects/CI and denominators
Materials needed: Question-specific tables/plans, direct comparisons/applicability, effects/CI, people/ankle/event/exposure denominators, missingness/adherence, separate confirmation and long-term harms. Need recorded only; no search/research now. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
32 Partly verified Full text not readStored summary read N32 · Evidence conditionAre applicability records separated from content review and instructions?Supplementary
These are summary-based applicability records. Existing content/question-boundary review remains incomplete; candidate pending/eligible markers are preserved as history.
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Applicability records, existing candidate history and content review
Materials needed: Content review and subsequent actual evidence/correction work. Original content-production scope excludes clinical QA/testing, external-link/access/web/API research, new calculations/grades and device/app recommendations or exercise/rehabilitation/prevention/treatment-replacement instructions. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
No items match your search or filter.

32 itemsWhat the statuses mean

Assessment scope

Stored-material review date
Not recorded
Original evidence cut-off
2026-08-26
Scope actually checked
Existing review summaries and stored records of methodological application. Full papers, supplements, registrations, plans and original data were not read.
What the dates mean
This is the date the stored materials were checked, not the date of a new search of the clinical literature.
Population
2BFit: 522 athletes aged 12–70 after previous ankle sprain, 256/266. The 2023 primary-care app trial had 165 participants; population details remain unidentified and concern separate context.
Ingredient, formulation and route
Eight-week home neuromuscular training with board, exercise sheets, DVD and web materials after usual care, separated from app delivery/bracing comparisons.
Dose
Original study exposure: three times weekly, up to 30 minutes, for eight weeks. 2023 app exposure details remain unverified. No new totals, device/app recommendations or exercise instructions.
Comparator
2BFit usual care. App-comparator details remain unverified; 2014 bracing comparison/2017 review concern different contexts.
Measured outcome
Same-ankle recurrence over one year; distinguish self-report/independent adjudication, people/repeated events/exposure time and other endpoints.
Duration
2BFit eight-week intervention/12-month follow-up. App-intervention/follow-up details remain unverified. The 2014 context compared 12-month bracing with eight-week training; the 2017 recurrence context concerned 12 months.
Questions outside this scope
Repurposing specific balance-board-program effects to all apps/ankle exercises/other populations or durations; Mixing app HR, board RR, bracing/review results, people/events/exposure units or denominators; Creating new causality/safety/equivalence/superiority/independence certification from original adherence/attrition/reporting limitations; Adding the same people, ankles, arms, events, times, citations, related sheets and review-included trials as new independent trials/participants; New calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions

Evidence and sources

The links below lead to the sources. A link alone does not mean the original source was read or its latest publication status verified.

R01 · Hupperets MDW, et al. Effect of unsupervised home based proprioceptive training on recurrences of ankle sprain. BMJ. 2009;339:b2684. PMID: 19589822.

PubMed

Material type
Multicentre randomized usual-care-controlled trial
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/plans remain unread
Findings recorded in the stored summary
56/256 (22%) versus 89/266 (33%); adjusted RR 0.63 (0.45–0.88), NNT 9
Record level
2BFit core-endpoint summary from the original evidence list, separated from other contexts
Study overlap and independent replication
The 2BFit core one-year same-ankle recurrence trial concerns a specific eight-week program combining a board and delivery support. The app context used different delivery and was not counted as direct conflict with 2BFit. Bracing versus training is a different comparison and is not repurposed as app effects/equal-duration comparison. The review context is not an independent clinical trial; no difference does not certify equivalence. Parent 2975 and its s0/s1 claims share the original 2BFit citation/trial context and counterview mentions of the 2023 app, 2014 bracing and 2017 review. The same people, ankles, arms, events, times, citations, related sheets and review-included trials are not newly added as independent trials/participants. These are provisional reference-context items; actual cohort/independence and review-included-study relationships remain incompletely reviewed.
Public availability, access and reading status by material
MaterialPublic availabilityAccess statusActually readNotes
Stored summaryLocal preserved copy of the complete parent summaryStored summary readSummary readOnly original PubMed URL/ISRCTN are preserved. Exact titles/authors/DOI/PMID/registration/URLs are not guessed for contexts without citations. No new external reading/access/verification certification.
External abstractOriginal identifier/bibliography or required-material entry; public availability/access details remain unverifiedUnread; access testing not performedNot readOnly original PubMed URL/ISRCTN are preserved. Exact titles/authors/DOI/PMID/registration/URLs are not guessed for contexts without citations. No new external reading/access/verification certification.
External full textOriginal identifier/bibliography or required-material entry; public availability/access details remain unverifiedUnread; access testing not performedNot readOnly original PubMed URL/ISRCTN are preserved. Exact titles/authors/DOI/PMID/registration/URLs are not guessed for contexts without citations. No new external reading/access/verification certification.
Registration materialOriginal identifier/bibliography or required-material entry; public availability/access details remain unverifiedUnread; access testing not performedNot readOnly original PubMed URL/ISRCTN are preserved. Exact titles/authors/DOI/PMID/registration/URLs are not guessed for contexts without citations. No new external reading/access/verification certification.
Protocol/SAPOriginal identifier/bibliography or required-material entry; public availability/access details remain unverifiedUnread; access testing not performedNot readOnly original PubMed URL/ISRCTN are preserved. Exact titles/authors/DOI/PMID/registration/URLs are not guessed for contexts without citations. No new external reading/access/verification certification.

R02 · 2023 primary-care app trial — Unidentified reference context in the original counterview

Material type
Original mention of a primary-care app trial; detailed design/citation unidentified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/plans remain unread
Findings recorded in the stored summary
Original counterview: 165 participants, null HR 1.14 (0.59–2.21), adherence 6.1%. Exact citation/design/comparator/duration and denominator details remain unverified.
Record level
Separate reference-context summary in the original counterview; no separate evidence/citation-list entry or exact citation
Study overlap and independent replication
The 2BFit core one-year same-ankle recurrence trial concerns a specific eight-week program combining a board and delivery support. The app context used different delivery and was not counted as direct conflict with 2BFit. Bracing versus training is a different comparison and is not repurposed as app effects/equal-duration comparison. The review context is not an independent clinical trial; no difference does not certify equivalence. Parent 2975 and its s0/s1 claims share the original 2BFit citation/trial context and counterview mentions of the 2023 app, 2014 bracing and 2017 review. The same people, ankles, arms, events, times, citations, related sheets and review-included trials are not newly added as independent trials/participants. These are provisional reference-context items; actual cohort/independence and review-included-study relationships remain incompletely reviewed.
Public availability, access and reading status by material
MaterialPublic availabilityAccess statusActually readNotes
Stored summaryLocal preserved copy of the complete parent summaryStored summary readSummary readOnly original PubMed URL/ISRCTN are preserved. Exact titles/authors/DOI/PMID/registration/URLs are not guessed for contexts without citations. No new external reading/access/verification certification.
External abstractUnidentified/unacquired material itemsUnread; access testing not performedNot readOnly original PubMed URL/ISRCTN are preserved. Exact titles/authors/DOI/PMID/registration/URLs are not guessed for contexts without citations. No new external reading/access/verification certification.
External full textUnidentified/unacquired material itemsUnread; access testing not performedNot readOnly original PubMed URL/ISRCTN are preserved. Exact titles/authors/DOI/PMID/registration/URLs are not guessed for contexts without citations. No new external reading/access/verification certification.
Registration materialUnidentified/unacquired material itemsUnread; access testing not performedNot readOnly original PubMed URL/ISRCTN are preserved. Exact titles/authors/DOI/PMID/registration/URLs are not guessed for contexts without citations. No new external reading/access/verification certification.
Protocol/SAPUnidentified/unacquired material itemsUnread; access testing not performedNot readOnly original PubMed URL/ISRCTN are preserved. Exact titles/authors/DOI/PMID/registration/URLs are not guessed for contexts without citations. No new external reading/access/verification certification.

R03 · 2014 bracing comparison trial — Unidentified reference context in the original counterview

Material type
Original mention of a bracing comparison trial; detailed design/citation unidentified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/plans remain unread
Findings recorded in the stored summary
Original counterview: 12-month bracing superior to eight-week training; exact effects/CI, population/denominators and citation remain unverified.
Record level
Separate reference-context summary in the original counterview; no separate evidence/citation-list entry or exact citation
Study overlap and independent replication
The 2BFit core one-year same-ankle recurrence trial concerns a specific eight-week program combining a board and delivery support. The app context used different delivery and was not counted as direct conflict with 2BFit. Bracing versus training is a different comparison and is not repurposed as app effects/equal-duration comparison. The review context is not an independent clinical trial; no difference does not certify equivalence. Parent 2975 and its s0/s1 claims share the original 2BFit citation/trial context and counterview mentions of the 2023 app, 2014 bracing and 2017 review. The same people, ankles, arms, events, times, citations, related sheets and review-included trials are not newly added as independent trials/participants. These are provisional reference-context items; actual cohort/independence and review-included-study relationships remain incompletely reviewed.
Public availability, access and reading status by material
MaterialPublic availabilityAccess statusActually readNotes
Stored summaryLocal preserved copy of the complete parent summaryStored summary readSummary readOnly original PubMed URL/ISRCTN are preserved. Exact titles/authors/DOI/PMID/registration/URLs are not guessed for contexts without citations. No new external reading/access/verification certification.
External abstractUnidentified/unacquired material itemsUnread; access testing not performedNot readOnly original PubMed URL/ISRCTN are preserved. Exact titles/authors/DOI/PMID/registration/URLs are not guessed for contexts without citations. No new external reading/access/verification certification.
External full textUnidentified/unacquired material itemsUnread; access testing not performedNot readOnly original PubMed URL/ISRCTN are preserved. Exact titles/authors/DOI/PMID/registration/URLs are not guessed for contexts without citations. No new external reading/access/verification certification.
Registration materialUnidentified/unacquired material itemsUnread; access testing not performedNot readOnly original PubMed URL/ISRCTN are preserved. Exact titles/authors/DOI/PMID/registration/URLs are not guessed for contexts without citations. No new external reading/access/verification certification.
Protocol/SAPUnidentified/unacquired material itemsUnread; access testing not performedNot readOnly original PubMed URL/ISRCTN are preserved. Exact titles/authors/DOI/PMID/registration/URLs are not guessed for contexts without citations. No new external reading/access/verification certification.

R04 · 2017 training/bracing review — Unidentified reference context in the original counterview

Material type
Original mention of a review; methods/included trials/citation unidentified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/plans remain unread
Findings recorded in the stored summary
Original counterview: no 12-month recurrence difference found between training/bracing; original review/included trials/effects/CI remain unverified.
Record level
Separate reference-context summary in the original counterview; no separate evidence/citation-list entry or exact citation
Study overlap and independent replication
The 2BFit core one-year same-ankle recurrence trial concerns a specific eight-week program combining a board and delivery support. The app context used different delivery and was not counted as direct conflict with 2BFit. Bracing versus training is a different comparison and is not repurposed as app effects/equal-duration comparison. The review context is not an independent clinical trial; no difference does not certify equivalence. Parent 2975 and its s0/s1 claims share the original 2BFit citation/trial context and counterview mentions of the 2023 app, 2014 bracing and 2017 review. The same people, ankles, arms, events, times, citations, related sheets and review-included trials are not newly added as independent trials/participants. These are provisional reference-context items; actual cohort/independence and review-included-study relationships remain incompletely reviewed.
Public availability, access and reading status by material
MaterialPublic availabilityAccess statusActually readNotes
Stored summaryLocal preserved copy of the complete parent summaryStored summary readSummary readOnly original PubMed URL/ISRCTN are preserved. Exact titles/authors/DOI/PMID/registration/URLs are not guessed for contexts without citations. No new external reading/access/verification certification.
External abstractUnidentified/unacquired material itemsUnread; access testing not performedNot readOnly original PubMed URL/ISRCTN are preserved. Exact titles/authors/DOI/PMID/registration/URLs are not guessed for contexts without citations. No new external reading/access/verification certification.
External full textUnidentified/unacquired material itemsUnread; access testing not performedNot readOnly original PubMed URL/ISRCTN are preserved. Exact titles/authors/DOI/PMID/registration/URLs are not guessed for contexts without citations. No new external reading/access/verification certification.
Registration materialUnidentified/unacquired material itemsUnread; access testing not performedNot readOnly original PubMed URL/ISRCTN are preserved. Exact titles/authors/DOI/PMID/registration/URLs are not guessed for contexts without citations. No new external reading/access/verification certification.
Protocol/SAPUnidentified/unacquired material itemsUnread; access testing not performedNot readOnly original PubMed URL/ISRCTN are preserved. Exact titles/authors/DOI/PMID/registration/URLs are not guessed for contexts without citations. No new external reading/access/verification certification.

Report counts versus independent study counts

The 2BFit core one-year same-ankle recurrence trial concerns a specific eight-week program combining a board and delivery support. The app context used different delivery and was not counted as direct conflict with 2BFit. Bracing versus training is a different comparison and is not repurposed as app effects/equal-duration comparison. The review context is not an independent clinical trial; no difference does not certify equivalence. Parent 2975 and its s0/s1 claims share the original 2BFit citation/trial context and counterview mentions of the 2023 app, 2014 bracing and 2017 review. The same people, ankles, arms, events, times, citations, related sheets and review-included trials are not newly added as independent trials/participants. These are provisional reference-context items; actual cohort/independence and review-included-study relationships remain incompletely reviewed.

Review criteria

Version 1.0 · Criteria record date 2026-10-06. These are Chamgap's own application conditions, informed by the referenced methods. They do not constitute official assessment-tool certification or a new efficacy score.

N01 · Which original one-year recurrence claim is selected?
Required materials and conditions
Selected subclaim wording/grade versus parent context
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for selected subclaim wording/grade versus parent context together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect selected subclaim wording/grade versus parent context with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N02 · Which previous-sprain population was studied?
Required materials and conditions
Athletes aged 12–70 after ankle sprain
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for athletes aged 12–70 after ankle sprain together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect athletes aged 12–70 after ankle sprain with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N03 · What was the specific delivery approach?
Required materials and conditions
Eight-week program with balance board, exercise sheets, DVD and web materials
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for eight-week program with balance board, exercise sheets, DVD and web materials together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect eight-week program with balance board, exercise sheets, DVD and web materials with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N04 · What were usual-care comparison and concurrent treatment?
Required materials and conditions
Additional training after usual care
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for additional training after usual care together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect additional training after usual care with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N05 · Are training duration/study exposure separated from use instructions?
Required materials and conditions
Original eight weeks, three times weekly, up to 30 minutes
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for original eight weeks, three times weekly, up to 30 minutes together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect original eight weeks, three times weekly, up to 30 minutes with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N06 · Are eight-week training and one-year outcomes separated?
Required materials and conditions
Intervention duration versus 12-month recurrence follow-up
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for intervention duration versus 12-month recurrence follow-up together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect intervention duration versus 12-month recurrence follow-up with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N07 · What are randomization and recurrence numerators?
Required materials and conditions
522 participants, 256/266, original recurrence 56/89
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for 522 participants, 256/266, original recurrence 56/89 together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect 522 participants, 256/266, original recurrence 56/89 with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N08 · How was same-ankle recurrence defined?
Required materials and conditions
Original event label, first/repeated events and confirmation
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for original event label, first/repeated events and confirmation together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect original event label, first/repeated events and confirmation with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N09 · Are self-reporting and masked adjudication separated?
Required materials and conditions
Initial monthly reporting versus independent physiotherapist/researcher adjudication
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for initial monthly reporting versus independent physiotherapist/researcher adjudication together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect initial monthly reporting versus independent physiotherapist/researcher adjudication with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N10 · Are recurrent people, repeated events and observations separated?
Required materials and conditions
Original numerators and people/ankle/event units
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for original numerators and people/ankle/event units together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect original numerators and people/ankle/event units with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N11 · Which comparison do adjusted RR/CI/NNT describe?
Required materials and conditions
2BFit one-year recurrence effects
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for 2BFit one-year recurrence effects together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect 2BFit one-year recurrence effects with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N12 · Are original absolute difference and arm percentages distinguished?
Required materials and conditions
22% versus 33% and original −11 percentage points
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for 22% versus 33% and original −11 percentage points together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect 22% versus 33% and original −11 percentage points with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N13 · Are exposure-time incidence density and one-year risk identical?
Required materials and conditions
1.86 versus 2.90 per 1,000 hours
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for 1.86 versus 2.90 per 1,000 hours together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect 1.86 versus 2.90 per 1,000 hours with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N14 · Are time-loss and cost/productivity outcomes retained separately?
Required materials and conditions
Other recurrence outcomes, RR 0.53 and 0.25
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for other recurrence outcomes, RR 0.53 and 0.25 together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect other recurrence outcomes, RR 0.53 and 0.25 with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N15 · Are adherence, comparator contamination and attrition retained together?
Required materials and conditions
58/25623%·5/2662%·14%
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for 58/256 (23%), 5/266 (2%) and 14% together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect 58/256 (23%), 5/266 (2%) and 14% with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N16 · Does ITT certify resolution of completeness/missingness?
Required materials and conditions
Analysis as randomized and actual missingness handling
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for analysis as randomized and actual missingness handling together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect analysis as randomized and actual missingness handling with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N17 · Are original randomization/prespecified-endpoint descriptions preserved?
Required materials and conditions
Independent-researcher computer allocation and recurrence primary endpoint/registration
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for independent-researcher computer allocation and recurrence primary endpoint/registration together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect independent-researcher computer allocation and recurrence primary endpoint/registration with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N18 · Are 2023 app results mixed with 2BFit?
Required materials and conditions
Different-delivery trial, 165 participants, HR 1.14
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for different-delivery trial, 165 participants, HR 1.14 together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect different-delivery trial, 165 participants, HR 1.14 with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N19 · Are different bracing-trial/review results separated?
Required materials and conditions
2014 bracing superiority and no difference in 2017
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for 2014 bracing superiority and no difference in 2017 together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect 2014 bracing superiority and no difference in 2017 with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N20 · Is the separate exercise-harm reporting gap retained?
Required materials and conditions
Exercise-related AE collection/reporting versus harmlessness
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for exercise-related AE collection/reporting versus harmlessness together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Supplementary
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect exercise-related AE collection/reporting versus harmlessness with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N21 · What was actually read/identified?
Required materials and conditions
Preserved summary/original citation versus unidentified reference contexts
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for preserved summary/original citation versus unidentified reference contexts together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect preserved summary/original citation versus unidentified reference contexts with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N22 · Are registration dates/prespecification treated as current certification?
Required materials and conditions
ISRCTN34177180 and unestablished first public date
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for iSRCTN34177180 and unestablished first public date together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect iSRCTN34177180 and unestablished first public date with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N23 · Were protocol/SAP and estimand/missingness plans acquired?
Required materials and conditions
Separate prespecified-plan/analysis/amendment materials
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for separate prespecified-plan/analysis/amendment materials together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect separate prespecified-plan/analysis/amendment materials with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N24 · Are public funding, board supply and company involvement separated?
Required materials and conditions
2BFit support versus unverified other contexts
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for 2BFit support versus unverified other contexts together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect 2BFit support versus unverified other contexts with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N25 · Are specific positive effects, different-delivery null results and unverified details distinguished?
Required materials and conditions
Question/comparison-specific results and reading status
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for question/comparison-specific results and reading status together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect question/comparison-specific results and reading status with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N26 · Are one original citation and three reference contexts counted as unique trials?
Required materials and conditions
Document/context items versus trials/participants
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for document/context items versus trials/participants together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect document/context items versus trials/participants with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N27 · Are original single confirmation and independent replication distinguished?
Required materials and conditions
Parent R1/I2 and comparison/delivery differences
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for parent R1/I2 and comparison/delivery differences together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Supplementary
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect parent R1/I2 and comparison/delivery differences with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N28 · Are the subclaim grade and parent score/axes preserved?
Required materials and conditions
Selected B, absent subclaim values and parent B76
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for selected B, absent subclaim values and parent B76 together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect selected B, absent subclaim values and parent B76 with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N29 · Are both languages, citations and absent fields preserved?
Required materials and conditions
Both original languages and absent separate classification information
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for original bilingual text and absent classification fields together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect original bilingual text and absent classification fields with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N30 · Are source dates/corrections/history separated from production dates?
Required materials and conditions
Original 2026-08-26 and new conditions/application
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for original 2026-08-26 versus new conditions/application together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Required
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect original 2026-08-26 versus new conditions/application with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N31 · What direct materials would fill the selected gaps?
Required materials and conditions
Direct population/delivery/events, effects/CI and denominators
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for direct population/delivery/events, effects/CI and denominators together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Supplementary
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect direct population/delivery/events, effects/CI and denominators with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
N32 · Are applicability records separated from content review and instructions?
Required materials and conditions
Applicability records, existing candidate history and content review
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for production request, candidate history and content review together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Requirement and applicability
Supplementary
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect production request, candidate history and content review with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production
Referenced methods and the sections actually reviewed

M03 · Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08

Official methodology · §3.1, §3.2.1–3.2.3, MECIR C5/C7/C13

Referenced principle
Clearly record the question, eligibility conditions and reasons for changes, and distinguish variations in interventions.
Extent of review
Link preserved methodological application records; no current clinical-content reassessment or external-link verification was performed.

M04 · Cochrane Handbook 6.5.1 (2025), chapter updated 2025-03

Official methodology · §4.5, §4.6.1–4.6.3, MECIR C42

Referenced principle
Distinguish studies from reports and link them; do not omit a study solely because results are unreported.
Extent of review
Link preserved methodological application records; no current clinical-content reassessment or external-link verification was performed.

M08 · Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10

Official methodology · §8.1–8.2.3, Table 8.2.a

Referenced principle
Define the outcome and effect of interest, then examine randomization, deviations, missing data, measurement and selective reporting.
Extent of review
Link preserved methodological application records; no current clinical-content reassessment or external-link verification was performed.

M15 · Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08

Official methodology · §15.2.4, §15.3.1–15.3.3

Referenced principle
Distinguish effect estimates, intervals, importance and applicability. Sample size alone does not determine precision.
Extent of review
Link preserved methodological application records; no current clinical-content reassessment or external-link verification was performed.

M19 · Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10

Official methodology · §19.1.2, §19.2.1–19.2.4

Referenced principle
Harm questions may require different designs, populations and follow-up from efficacy questions. Case reports do not establish incidence rates.
Extent of review
Link preserved methodological application records; no current clinical-content reassessment or external-link verification was performed.
What the statuses mean
Partly verified
Some information exists in the preserved review summary; detailed original materials remain unverified. This does not certify a passed review or clinical efficacy.
Unverified
Detailed materials for the selected condition could not be established within the stored scope; this does not mean zero effect, zero studies or safety
Review incomplete
Review of existing content incomplete
Met
Use only within the relevant conditions after existing content review; no automatic designation in this preparation
Not reported
Distinguish only within materials actually read; do not turn unread external materials into unreported findings
Inaccessible
Not applied during this preparation because actual access was not tested
Not applicable
Use with a reason for non-applicability based on an explicit question boundary
Conflicting data
Judge after actual material comparison; review was not performed during this preparation
Insufficient evidence for the conditions
Do not use as a clinical grade encompassing currently unread materials

Change history

2026-10-14 · Public page/material version 1.0

Public pages and materials were prepared from the existing 32 items. No new clinical search, verification-status change or scoring was performed.

The stored-material review date (Not recorded) and original evidence cut-off (2026-08-26) were retained unchanged.

Researcher downloads

These materials provide the same evidence, scope and verification status as this page.

View all item details

N01 · Which original one-year recurrence claim is selected?

Current findings
The selected claim is reduced same-ankle recurrence over one year, original subclaim grade B, with the note 22% versus 33%/NNT 9. Absent subclaim score/status/axes are preserved separately from parent B with 76 points and axes.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Exact same-ankle recurrence definition, population/comparator, duration/denominators and user boundary review. Parent scores do not fill the subclaim score.
Required materials and conditions
Selected subclaim wording/grade versus parent context
Materials to obtain first
Exact same-ankle recurrence definition, population/comparator, duration/denominators and user boundary review. Parent scores do not fill the subclaim score.
Further research
Materials needed: Exact same-ankle recurrence definition, population/comparator, duration/denominators and user boundary review. Parent scores do not fill the subclaim score. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for selected subclaim wording/grade versus parent context together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect selected subclaim wording/grade versus parent context with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01

N02 · Which previous-sprain population was studied?

Current findings
2BFit randomized 522 athletes aged 12–70. The original intervention was home training after usual care following ankle sprain. Injury severity, recovery/start criteria, sports/comorbidities are not established in detail by the summary.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Eligibility/exclusions, previous sprain/severity, usual care, training start, exposure and direct other-population data. Do not extend to all ankle disorders/app users.
Required materials and conditions
Athletes aged 12–70 after ankle sprain
Materials to obtain first
Eligibility/exclusions, previous sprain/severity, usual care, training start, exposure and direct other-population data. Do not extend to all ankle disorders/app users.
Further research
Materials needed: Eligibility/exclusions, previous sprain/severity, usual care, training start, exposure and direct other-population data. Do not extend to all ankle disorders/app users. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for athletes aged 12–70 after ankle sprain together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect athletes aged 12–70 after ankle sprain with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01

N03 · What was the specific delivery approach?

Current findings
The original was eight weeks of home neuromuscular training supplying a balance board, exercise sheets, DVD and web materials. Do not simplify into the board’s isolated-component effect, all ankle exercise or app effects.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Components, support/contact, training content, adherence, actual products and direct comparisons of delivery approaches. No device/app recommendations or exercise instructions.
Required materials and conditions
Eight-week program with balance board, exercise sheets, DVD and web materials
Materials to obtain first
Components, support/contact, training content, adherence, actual products and direct comparisons of delivery approaches. No device/app recommendations or exercise instructions.
Further research
Materials needed: Components, support/contact, training content, adherence, actual products and direct comparisons of delivery approaches. No device/app recommendations or exercise instructions. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for eight-week program with balance board, exercise sheets, DVD and web materials together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect eight-week program with balance board, exercise sheets, DVD and web materials with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01

N04 · What were usual-care comparison and concurrent treatment?

Current findings
Original design was a multicentre randomized usual-care-controlled trial; effects concern adding an eight-week program after usual care. Actual concurrent bracing, physiotherapy, medication, return-to-sport/exposure in both arms remain unverified.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Original usual care, additional training/other exposure, contact, contamination and recovery/return criteria in both arms. Do not repurpose effects to no treatment/other comparators.
Required materials and conditions
Additional training after usual care
Materials to obtain first
Original usual care, additional training/other exposure, contact, contamination and recovery/return criteria in both arms. Do not repurpose effects to no treatment/other comparators.
Further research
Materials needed: Original usual care, additional training/other exposure, contact, contamination and recovery/return criteria in both arms. Do not repurpose effects to no treatment/other comparators. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for additional training after usual care together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect additional training after usual care with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01

N05 · Are training duration/study exposure separated from use instructions?

Current findings
Original study facts record three sessions weekly, up to 30 minutes each, for eight weeks. Preserve study-exposure identity only; do not calculate total sessions/time or create exercise/rehabilitation/prevention instructions.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Original actual training, adherence/stopping, support/contact and phase-specific exposure. No certification of identical effects for other durations/intensities.
Required materials and conditions
Original eight weeks, three times weekly, up to 30 minutes
Materials to obtain first
Original actual training, adherence/stopping, support/contact and phase-specific exposure. No certification of identical effects for other durations/intensities.
Further research
Materials needed: Original actual training, adherence/stopping, support/contact and phase-specific exposure. No certification of identical effects for other durations/intensities. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for original eight weeks, three times weekly, up to 30 minutes together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect original eight weeks, three times weekly, up to 30 minutes with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01

N06 · Are eight-week training and one-year outcomes separated?

Current findings
Intervention lasted eight weeks and same-ankle recurrence follow-up lasted 12 months. Maintenance training after completion, follow-up exposure/stopping and visit-specific observation remain unverified in detail. Training and event-observation periods do not become the same denominator.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Original actual training/maintenance, follow-up schedules, observation duration/loss and sports exposure. Do not calculate new day counts/exercise amounts from one year.
Required materials and conditions
Intervention duration versus 12-month recurrence follow-up
Materials to obtain first
Original actual training/maintenance, follow-up schedules, observation duration/loss and sports exposure. Do not calculate new day counts/exercise amounts from one year.
Further research
Materials needed: Original actual training/maintenance, follow-up schedules, observation duration/loss and sports exposure. Do not calculate new day counts/exercise amounts from one year. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for intervention duration versus 12-month recurrence follow-up together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect intervention duration versus 12-month recurrence follow-up with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01

N07 · What are randomization and recurrence numerators?

Current findings
The original records 522 randomized (256/266) and 56/256 (22%) versus 89/266 (33%). Separately retain relationships among people, ankles, recurrence events, repeated reports and time; do not calculate additional event/participant totals.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Endpoint-numerator definitions, arm analysis/follow-up/observed denominators, repeated-recurrence handling and original flow tables. Do not copy numerators/denominators to all other endpoints/trials.
Required materials and conditions
522 participants, 256/266, original recurrence 56/89
Materials to obtain first
Endpoint-numerator definitions, arm analysis/follow-up/observed denominators, repeated-recurrence handling and original flow tables. Do not copy numerators/denominators to all other endpoints/trials.
Further research
Materials needed: Endpoint-numerator definitions, arm analysis/follow-up/observed denominators, repeated-recurrence handling and original flow tables. Do not copy numerators/denominators to all other endpoints/trials. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for 522 participants, 256/266, original recurrence 56/89 together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect 522 participants, 256/266, original recurrence 56/89 with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01

N08 · How was same-ankle recurrence defined?

Current findings
The original endpoint was same-ankle recurrence reported monthly and independently adjudicated under masking. Diagnostic/injury/recurrence criteria, first/all-repeated-event handling and clinical-confirmation details remain unverified. Do not extend to the opposite ankle/all injuries.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Event definitions, original questionnaires, adjudication rules, repeated/contralateral events, severity and confirmation data. Materials clarifying aggregation of original numerators 56/89.
Required materials and conditions
Original event label, first/repeated events and confirmation
Materials to obtain first
Event definitions, original questionnaires, adjudication rules, repeated/contralateral events, severity and confirmation data. Materials clarifying aggregation of original numerators 56/89.
Further research
Materials needed: Event definitions, original questionnaires, adjudication rules, repeated/contralateral events, severity and confirmation data. Materials clarifying aggregation of original numerators 56/89. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for original event label, first/repeated events and confirmation together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect original event label, first/repeated events and confirmation with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01

N09 · Are self-reporting and masked adjudication separated?

Current findings
The original records monthly self-reports followed by independent adjudication by a masked physiotherapist and researcher. Initial reporting was self-reported and participant masking impossible. Do not add a declaration that all reports were confirmed through testing/clinical visits.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Original reporting/missingness, disagreement/adjudication, assessor masking, objective confirmation and participant expectations. No formal RoB assessment in this production.
Required materials and conditions
Initial monthly reporting versus independent physiotherapist/researcher adjudication
Materials to obtain first
Original reporting/missingness, disagreement/adjudication, assessor masking, objective confirmation and participant expectations. No formal RoB assessment in this production.
Further research
Materials needed: Original reporting/missingness, disagreement/adjudication, assessor masking, objective confirmation and participant expectations. No formal RoB assessment in this production. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for initial monthly reporting versus independent physiotherapist/researcher adjudication together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect initial monthly reporting versus independent physiotherapist/researcher adjudication with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01

N10 · Are recurrent people, repeated events and observations separated?

Current findings
Preserve original 56/256, 89/266 and monthly reporting. Exact aggregation of at-least-one recurrence, first/all-repeated events and same-person bilateral-ankle/report relationships remains unverified. Monthly/repeated events are not new independent participants.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Original event aggregation, person/ankle identifiers, repeat handling, analysis units and observation periods. No additional participant/event counts or new incidence-rate calculations.
Required materials and conditions
Original numerators and people/ankle/event units
Materials to obtain first
Original event aggregation, person/ankle identifiers, repeat handling, analysis units and observation periods. No additional participant/event counts or new incidence-rate calculations.
Further research
Materials needed: Original event aggregation, person/ankle identifiers, repeat handling, analysis units and observation periods. No additional participant/event counts or new incidence-rate calculations. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for original numerators and people/ankle/event units together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect original numerators and people/ankle/event units with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01

N11 · Which comparison do adjusted RR/CI/NNT describe?

Current findings
Original adjusted RR 0.63 (95% CI 0.45–0.88) and NNT 9 concern 2BFit same-ankle recurrence over one year. Do not copy to app/bracing or time-loss/cost endpoints. Original adjusted-model/estimand details remain unverified.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Original models/adjustment variables, effects/CI, NNT definition/denominators and estimands. No new RR/RRR/NNT/CI recalculation or invented examples.
Required materials and conditions
2BFit one-year recurrence effects
Materials to obtain first
Original models/adjustment variables, effects/CI, NNT definition/denominators and estimands. No new RR/RRR/NNT/CI recalculation or invented examples.
Further research
Materials needed: Original models/adjustment variables, effects/CI, NNT definition/denominators and estimands. No new RR/RRR/NNT/CI recalculation or invented examples. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for 2BFit one-year recurrence effects together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect 2BFit one-year recurrence effects with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01

N12 · Are original absolute difference and arm percentages distinguished?

Current findings
The original crux/rationale records 22% versus 33% and absolute recurrence difference −11 percentage points. Do not transfer to within-arm improvement, relative effects, other ankles/apps or calculate exact unrounded values/new absolute differences.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Original arm denominators/rounding, effect definitions, adjusted/unadjusted results and duration/analysis data. Do not newly convert RR and absolute differences into one another.
Required materials and conditions
22% versus 33% and original −11 percentage points
Materials to obtain first
Original arm denominators/rounding, effect definitions, adjusted/unadjusted results and duration/analysis data. Do not newly convert RR and absolute differences into one another.
Further research
Materials needed: Original arm denominators/rounding, effect definitions, adjusted/unadjusted results and duration/analysis data. Do not newly convert RR and absolute differences into one another. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for 22% versus 33% and original −11 percentage points together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect 22% versus 33% and original −11 percentage points with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01

N13 · Are exposure-time incidence density and one-year risk identical?

Current findings
Original study facts record incidence density 1.86 versus 2.90 per 1,000 ankle-exposure hours. These differ in units from 22% versus 33% with person denominators. Do not calculate actual total exposure hours, new event counts/incidence-density ratios.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Actual arm sports exposure, recording/missingness, incidence-density numerators/denominators and models/CI. Distinguish time, people and ankle units.
Required materials and conditions
1.86 versus 2.90 per 1,000 hours
Materials to obtain first
Actual arm sports exposure, recording/missingness, incidence-density numerators/denominators and models/CI. Distinguish time, people and ankle units.
Further research
Materials needed: Actual arm sports exposure, recording/missingness, incidence-density numerators/denominators and models/CI. Distinguish time, people and ankle units. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for 1.86 versus 2.90 per 1,000 hours together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect 1.86 versus 2.90 per 1,000 hours with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01

N14 · Are time-loss and cost/productivity outcomes retained separately?

Current findings
The original rationale records time-loss recurrence RR 0.53 and medical-cost/productivity-loss recurrence RR 0.25 in the same direction. Definitions, numerators/denominators, CI/times/models remain unverified in detail. Do not copy primary RR 0.63/CI or NNT 9.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Original endpoint tables, event/cost definitions, denominators, effects/CI and hierarchy/multiplicity. No new calculations/addition beyond original numbers.
Required materials and conditions
Other recurrence outcomes, RR 0.53 and 0.25
Materials to obtain first
Original endpoint tables, event/cost definitions, denominators, effects/CI and hierarchy/multiplicity. No new calculations/addition beyond original numbers.
Further research
Materials needed: Original endpoint tables, event/cost definitions, denominators, effects/CI and hierarchy/multiplicity. No new calculations/addition beyond original numbers. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for other recurrence outcomes, RR 0.53 and 0.25 together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect other recurrence outcomes, RR 0.53 and 0.25 with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01

N15 · Are adherence, comparator contamination and attrition retained together?

Current findings
Preserve original full adherence 58/256 (23%), comparator contamination 5/266 (2%) and follow-up attrition 14%. Adherence definition, partial adherence and arm-specific loss/reasons remain unverified in detail. No adherer effects, new adherence differences/attrition counts/rates.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Adherence measurement, actual exposure, contamination/concurrent training, arm withdrawal/missingness and sensitivity analyses. Low adherence does not newly establish delivery effects/causality.
Required materials and conditions
58/25623%·5/2662%·14%
Materials to obtain first
Adherence measurement, actual exposure, contamination/concurrent training, arm withdrawal/missingness and sensitivity analyses. Low adherence does not newly establish delivery effects/causality.
Further research
Materials needed: Adherence measurement, actual exposure, contamination/concurrent training, arm withdrawal/missingness and sensitivity analyses. Low adherence does not newly establish delivery effects/causality. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for 58/256 (23%), 5/266 (2%) and 14% together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect 58/256 (23%), 5/266 (2%) and 14% with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01

N16 · Does ITT certify resolution of completeness/missingness?

Current findings
The original study description records all analyses following ITT principles alongside 14% attrition. ITT is not converted into universal completion/all-endpoint observation or zero missingness bias. Original B0 is parent-verdict context.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Original arm flow, endpoint analysis/observation, missingness handling/assumptions, follow-up loss and sensitivity. No clinical calculations/formal risk assessment in this production.
Required materials and conditions
Analysis as randomized and actual missingness handling
Materials to obtain first
Original arm flow, endpoint analysis/observation, missingness handling/assumptions, follow-up loss and sensitivity. No clinical calculations/formal risk assessment in this production.
Further research
Materials needed: Original arm flow, endpoint analysis/observation, missingness handling/assumptions, follow-up loss and sensitivity. No clinical calculations/formal risk assessment in this production. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for analysis as randomized and actual missingness handling together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect analysis as randomized and actual missingness handling with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01

N17 · Are original randomization/prespecified-endpoint descriptions preserved?

Current findings
The original records independent-researcher computer allocation, impossible participant masking/masked adjudication, ITT, and matching prespecified self-reported recurrence primary endpoint/ISRCTN34177180. Preserve original quotations/history only; no plan/procedure comparison now.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Allocation concealment/implementation, plans/amendments, registration versions/public dates and original-report comparison. The unestablished first registration publication date does not newly establish prospective registration.
Required materials and conditions
Independent-researcher computer allocation and recurrence primary endpoint/registration
Materials to obtain first
Allocation concealment/implementation, plans/amendments, registration versions/public dates and original-report comparison. The unestablished first registration publication date does not newly establish prospective registration.
Further research
Materials needed: Allocation concealment/implementation, plans/amendments, registration versions/public dates and original-report comparison. The unestablished first registration publication date does not newly establish prospective registration. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for independent-researcher computer allocation and recurrence primary endpoint/registration together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect independent-researcher computer allocation and recurrence primary endpoint/registration with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01

N18 · Are 2023 app results mixed with 2BFit?

Current findings
The original counterview records a primary-care app trial with 165 participants, null HR 1.14 (0.59–2.21), adherence 6.1%. Preserve the original scope that delivery differed from 2BFit supplying a board/DVD and was not counted as direct conflict. Citation/design details remain unidentified.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Exact app citations/registration, population/comparator/duration, endpoints/denominators/exposure/adherence, models and direct comparisons. Do not substitute app HR for board RR or effects of all apps.
Required materials and conditions
Different-delivery trial, 165 participants, HR 1.14
Materials to obtain first
Exact app citations/registration, population/comparator/duration, endpoints/denominators/exposure/adherence, models and direct comparisons. Do not substitute app HR for board RR or effects of all apps.
Further research
Materials needed: Exact app citations/registration, population/comparator/duration, endpoints/denominators/exposure/adherence, models and direct comparisons. Do not substitute app HR for board RR or effects of all apps. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for different-delivery trial, 165 participants, HR 1.14 together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect different-delivery trial, 165 participants, HR 1.14 with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01 R02

N19 · Are different bracing-trial/review results separated?

Current findings
The original records 12-month bracing superior to eight-week training in the 2014 trial and no 12-month recurrence difference between training/bracing in a 2017 review. Populations, citations, denominators, effects and CI for both contexts remain unverified; no difference does not become equivalence.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Each citation, original trials/review-included studies/overlap, exact comparators/durations and effects/CI/denominators. Do not count different research as new pooled effects/unique trial totals.
Required materials and conditions
2014 bracing superiority and no difference in 2017
Materials to obtain first
Each citation, original trials/review-included studies/overlap, exact comparators/durations and effects/CI/denominators. Do not count different research as new pooled effects/unique trial totals.
Further research
Materials needed: Each citation, original trials/review-included studies/overlap, exact comparators/durations and effects/CI/denominators. Do not count different research as new pooled effects/unique trial totals. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for 2014 bracing superiority and no difference in 2017 together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect 2014 bracing superiority and no difference in 2017 with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R03 R04

N20 · Is the separate exercise-harm reporting gap retained?

Current findings
The original safety description records that exercise-related adverse events were not collected/reported in a separate table and this trial cannot establish harmlessness. Preserve this reporting limitation; do not extend to zero AE or long-term safety.
Verification status
Unverified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Harm collection/definitions, arm actual training/exposure, events/discontinuation/relatedness/denominators and long-term data. No exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention instructions.
Required materials and conditions
Exercise-related AE collection/reporting versus harmlessness
Materials to obtain first
Harm collection/definitions, arm actual training/exposure, events/discontinuation/relatedness/denominators and long-term data. No exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention instructions.
Further research
Materials needed: Harm collection/definitions, arm actual training/exposure, events/discontinuation/relatedness/denominators and long-term data. No exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention instructions. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for exercise-related AE collection/reporting versus harmlessness together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect exercise-related AE collection/reporting versus harmlessness with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01

N21 · What was actually read/identified?

Current findings
The complete preserved parent summary was read for production and retained in the original archive. The single citation identifies 2BFit; three app/bracing/review entries are unidentified counterview contexts. All external abstracts/full texts/registration/plans remain unread.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Exact report citations/originals, acquisition/reading scope, versions/dates. URLs/historical quotations are not upgraded to current reading; no external-link/access testing.
Required materials and conditions
Preserved summary/original citation versus unidentified reference contexts
Materials to obtain first
Exact report citations/originals, acquisition/reading scope, versions/dates. URLs/historical quotations are not upgraded to current reading; no external-link/access testing.
Further research
Materials needed: Exact report citations/originals, acquisition/reading scope, versions/dates. URLs/historical quotations are not upgraded to current reading; no external-link/access testing. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for preserved summary/original citation versus unidentified reference contexts together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect preserved summary/original citation versus unidentified reference contexts with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01 R02 R03 R04

N22 · Are registration dates/prespecification treated as current certification?

Current findings
Original evidence/Korean text describes matching ISRCTN34177180 with the self-reported recurrence primary endpoint. Original study facts say the first registration public date was unestablished, so prospective registration was not asserted. App/bracing/review registrations are unidentified.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Actual registration versions/publication, start/amendment timing and endpoints/plans. No guessed official URLs, new registration reading or prespecification certification.
Required materials and conditions
ISRCTN34177180 and unestablished first public date
Materials to obtain first
Actual registration versions/publication, start/amendment timing and endpoints/plans. No guessed official URLs, new registration reading or prespecification certification.
Further research
Materials needed: Actual registration versions/publication, start/amendment timing and endpoints/plans. No guessed official URLs, new registration reading or prespecification certification. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for iSRCTN34177180 and unestablished first public date together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect iSRCTN34177180 and unestablished first public date with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01 R02 R03 R04

N23 · Were protocol/SAP and estimand/missingness plans acquired?

Current findings
Preserve original primary/ITT/allocation/adjudication descriptions and historical cross-checking. Each trial’s protocol/SAP, versions/timing and missingness/multiplicity/analysis plans were not acquired/read now.
Verification status
Unverified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Original protocols/SAP, amendment histories, endpoints/models/people/events/exposure, missingness/sensitivity and public timing. Unread external materials do not establish document absence.
Required materials and conditions
Separate prespecified-plan/analysis/amendment materials
Materials to obtain first
Original protocols/SAP, amendment histories, endpoints/models/people/events/exposure, missingness/sensitivity and public timing. Unread external materials do not establish document absence.
Further research
Materials needed: Original protocols/SAP, amendment histories, endpoints/models/people/events/exposure, missingness/sensitivity and public timing. Unread external materials do not establish document absence. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for separate prespecified-plan/analysis/amendment materials together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect separate prespecified-plan/analysis/amendment materials with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01 R02 R03 R04

N24 · Are public funding, board supply and company involvement separated?

Current findings
2BFit had ZonMw grant 750-20-002, declarations of no financial benefit/competing interests and Avanco AB boards supplied to participants. Preserve the original limitation that manufacturer donation/funding/analysis/writing/publication support was not reported. Supply is not manufacturer donation; employee authors/roles and app/bracing/review funding remain unverified now.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Item-specific company funding, product support, employee authors, design/analysis/data control and other support for each study. I2 does not establish absence of every item or independence certification.
Required materials and conditions
2BFit support versus unverified other contexts
Materials to obtain first
Item-specific company funding, product support, employee authors, design/analysis/data control and other support for each study. I2 does not establish absence of every item or independence certification.
Further research
Materials needed: Item-specific company funding, product support, employee authors, design/analysis/data control and other support for each study. I2 does not establish absence of every item or independence certification. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for 2BFit support versus unverified other contexts together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect 2BFit support versus unverified other contexts with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01 R02 R03 R04

N25 · Are specific positive effects, different-delivery null results and unverified details distinguished?

Current findings
Positive 2BFit recurrence, null 2023 app HR, 2014 bracing superiority and no difference in the 2017 review concern different contexts. Separate original descriptions from unverified citation/effect/harm details; no new verdict on broad claims.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Report-specific direct populations/interventions/comparators, endpoints/durations, effects/CI/denominators and actual access. Unread does not mean unreported; null does not mean zero effect/equivalence.
Required materials and conditions
Question/comparison-specific results and reading status
Materials to obtain first
Report-specific direct populations/interventions/comparators, endpoints/durations, effects/CI/denominators and actual access. Unread does not mean unreported; null does not mean zero effect/equivalence.
Further research
Materials needed: Report-specific direct populations/interventions/comparators, endpoints/durations, effects/CI/denominators and actual access. Unread does not mean unreported; null does not mean zero effect/equivalence. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for question/comparison-specific results and reading status together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect question/comparison-specific results and reading status with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01 R02 R03 R04

N26 · Are one original citation and three reference contexts counted as unique trials?

Current findings
Parent 2975 and its s0/s1 claims share original 2BFit citation/trial context and counterview mentions of the 2023 app, 2014 bracing and 2017 review. The same people, ankles, arms, events, times, citations, related sheets and review-included trials are not newly added as independent trials/participants. Four links comprise one identified paper and three unidentified contexts, including a 2017 review; they are not certification of four unique clinical trials or participant totals.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Citations/registration, review-included reports/overlap, cohorts/analysis, endpoints/repetition relationships. Unique trial/participant totals remain unrecorded.
Required materials and conditions
Document/context items versus trials/participants
Materials to obtain first
Citations/registration, review-included reports/overlap, cohorts/analysis, endpoints/repetition relationships. Unique trial/participant totals remain unrecorded.
Further research
Materials needed: Citations/registration, review-included reports/overlap, cohorts/analysis, endpoints/repetition relationships. Unique trial/participant totals remain unrecorded. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for document/context items versus trials/participants together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect document/context items versus trials/participants with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01 R02 R03 R04

N27 · Are original single confirmation and independent replication distinguished?

Current findings
Preserve parent replication R1/independence I2 and the original single confirmatory-trial description. App/bracing/review contexts are not counted as new same-condition independent replication/conflicts or unique-trial certification.
Verification status
Unverified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Separate prespecified, direct population/delivery/comparator/events, effects/CI/denominators, funding/author relationships and overlap materials for the selected question. No search/independence determination now.
Required materials and conditions
Parent R1/I2 and comparison/delivery differences
Materials to obtain first
Separate prespecified, direct population/delivery/comparator/events, effects/CI/denominators, funding/author relationships and overlap materials for the selected question. No search/independence determination now.
Further research
Materials needed: Separate prespecified, direct population/delivery/comparator/events, effects/CI/denominators, funding/author relationships and overlap materials for the selected question. No search/independence determination now. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for parent R1/I2 and comparison/delivery differences together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect parent R1/I2 and comparison/delivery differences with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01 R02 R03 R04

N28 · Are the subclaim grade and parent score/axes preserved?

Current findings
Preserve selected subclaim B/note/bilingual claims; absent subclaim score/status/axes remain unrecorded. Parent B with 76 points, unknown safety, B/H/R1/I2/E+/B0, unrecorded precision and true large-hard-endpoint RCT are parent context and do not fill subclaim values.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
User subclaim/parent-boundary review and actual correction materials. No new score/grade or official RoB 2/GRADE certification.
Required materials and conditions
Selected B, absent subclaim values and parent B76
Materials to obtain first
User subclaim/parent-boundary review and actual correction materials. No new score/grade or official RoB 2/GRADE certification.
Further research
Materials needed: User subclaim/parent-boundary review and actual correction materials. No new score/grade or official RoB 2/GRADE certification. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for selected B, absent subclaim values and parent B76 together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect selected B, absent subclaim values and parent B76 with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01

N29 · Are both languages, citations and absent fields preserved?

Current findings
Preserve original parent bilingual quotations/descriptions, evidence, citations and axes and selected-subclaim values in the complete original archive. Classification fields are absent and no new original fields are filled. No English-paper comparison now.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
User review of languages/terminology, event/exposure units, absences and selected scope. Distinguish production descriptions from original values.
Required materials and conditions
Both original languages and absent separate classification information
Materials to obtain first
User review of languages/terminology, event/exposure units, absences and selected scope. Distinguish production descriptions from original values.
Further research
Materials needed: User review of languages/terminology, event/exposure units, absences and selected scope. Distinguish production descriptions from original values. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for original bilingual text and absent classification fields together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect original bilingual text and absent classification fields with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01

N30 · Are source dates/corrections/history separated from production dates?

Current findings
Preserve original evidence date 2026-08-26, empty corrections/deliberation and verdict-decision cross-checking. Historical quotations/registration matching differ from current production, condition freezing/application and completed content review.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Update materials separating originals, events, conditions/observations and verdict decisions when new evidence/corrections arise. Historical wording is not completed clinical content review here.
Required materials and conditions
Original 2026-08-26 and new conditions/application
Materials to obtain first
Update materials separating originals, events, conditions/observations and verdict decisions when new evidence/corrections arise. Historical wording is not completed clinical content review here.
Further research
Materials needed: Update materials separating originals, events, conditions/observations and verdict decisions when new evidence/corrections arise. Historical wording is not completed clinical content review here. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for original 2026-08-26 versus new conditions/application together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect original 2026-08-26 versus new conditions/application with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01

N31 · What direct materials would fill the selected gaps?

Current findings
Specific 2BFit event/exposure, adherence/attrition, harms/reporting details require originals; app/bracing mentions do not substitute as identical effects.
Verification status
Unverified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Question-specific tables/plans, direct comparisons/applicability, effects/CI, people/ankle/event/exposure denominators, missingness/adherence, separate confirmation and long-term harms. Need recorded only; no search/research now.
Required materials and conditions
Direct population/delivery/events, effects/CI and denominators
Materials to obtain first
Question-specific tables/plans, direct comparisons/applicability, effects/CI, people/ankle/event/exposure denominators, missingness/adherence, separate confirmation and long-term harms. Need recorded only; no search/research now.
Further research
Materials needed: Question-specific tables/plans, direct comparisons/applicability, effects/CI, people/ankle/event/exposure denominators, missingness/adherence, separate confirmation and long-term harms. Need recorded only; no search/research now. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for direct population/delivery/events, effects/CI and denominators together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect direct population/delivery/events, effects/CI and denominators with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01 R02 R03 R04

N32 · Are applicability records separated from content review and instructions?

Current findings
These are summary-based applicability records. Existing content/question-boundary review remains incomplete; candidate pending/eligible markers are preserved as history.
Verification status
Partly verified
Materials actually read
Preserved summary read; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread
Why unverified
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, identified reports/reference contexts and comparison/endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed originals remain unverified and existing content review incomplete; this does not establish passed review/clinical certification.
Reason for missing information
Content review and subsequent actual evidence/correction work. Original content-production scope excludes clinical QA/testing, external-link/access/web/API research, new calculations/grades and device/app recommendations or exercise/rehabilitation/prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Required materials and conditions
Applicability records, existing candidate history and content review
Materials to obtain first
Content review and subsequent actual evidence/correction work. Original content-production scope excludes clinical QA/testing, external-link/access/web/API research, new calculations/grades and device/app recommendations or exercise/rehabilitation/prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Further research
Materials needed: Content review and subsequent actual evidence/correction work. Original content-production scope excludes clinical QA/testing, external-link/access/web/API research, new calculations/grades and device/app recommendations or exercise/rehabilitation/prevention/treatment-replacement instructions. Only material-request/research needs are recorded; no search/research was performed in this production.
Remaining uncertainty
External original materials remain unread and existing content review is incomplete. Original grades/scores/axes and historical verification/independence descriptions are not upgraded to new verdicts/certification.
Conditions for verification
Show original materials for production request, candidate history and content review together with selected-subclaim/parent boundaries, direct endpoints/estimands, denominators/exposure and the scope of external reading.
Why this condition is needed
Needed to connect production request, candidate history and content review with the selected question, actual population/intervention/comparator, endpoints/time points/estimands, denominators/repetition/exposure and reports/harms.
Application exceptions
Distinguish 2BFit’s actual post-sprain population, board/sheets/DVD/web support, usual care, eight weeks/one year, self-report/adjudication, people/ankles/events/exposure time, RR/CI/NNT, adherence/contamination/attrition, app/bracing/review contexts, harms and unread materials. Preserve original numbers only; no new calculations, invented quantities, effects/CI, grades/reassessment, independence certification or device/app recommendations/exercise/rehabilitation/recurrence-prevention/treatment-replacement instructions.
Referenced methods
Existing C/E/H distinctions of questions, populations, interventions, comparisons, reports/trials, endpoints/denominators and harms referenced for production

Related sources R01