| 1 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N01 · Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpointWhat are the original wording and subclaim verdict for artificial-tear use?Required |
The original claim is reduced artificial-tear use, grade D, with the note that the follow-up between-group P=0.562. The parent is C with 50 points for tear volume/OSDI. |
Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment |
Distinguish selected-row grade/note from the parent verdict |
Present artificial-tear use separately from tear-volume/symptom verdicts |
| 2 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N02 · Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpointWhich trial directly reported the selected use outcome?Required |
Artificial-tear-use P=0.562 belongs to the 2024 four-center US follow-up. The 2021 representative trial treated Schirmer and OSDI as coprimary outcomes. |
Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment |
Trial-specific original outcomes for the 2021 representative and 2024 follow-up trials |
Separate different trials of the same formulation and their direct outcomes |
| 3 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N03 · Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpointAre the follow-up population and applicability verified?Required |
The 2024 four-center US follow-up records 155 randomized and 116 analyzed. |
Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment |
Follow-up dry-eye eligibility, baseline, severity and centers |
Show recruitment-population differences between 2021 and the follow-up |
| 4 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N04 · Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpointWhat are the study identity and ingredient combination?Required |
The preserved study capsule combines lutein 20 mg, zeaxanthin 4 mg, curcuminoids 200 mg and vitamin D3 600 IU; the follow-up is described as the same formulation. |
Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment |
Fixed combination and product/exposure specifications for each trial |
Distinguish the fixed finished product from individual-ingredient efficacy and other formulations |
| 5 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N05 · Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpointAre placebo composition and trial-specific comparators distinguished?Required |
The 2021 representative trial compared 30 appearance-matched soybean-oil placebo participants with 30 product participants. The follow-up was also double-blind and placebo-controlled. |
Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment |
Active/placebo composition, appearance, exposure and blinding |
Show actual comparator conditions separately for each trial |
| 6 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N06 · Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpointWhat are the units and definition of artificial-tear use?Required |
The preserved follow-up outcome only states artificial-tear use. |
Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment |
Original definitions of frequency, volume, days, people or user proportion |
Present use units, aggregation and person denominators |
| 7 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N07 · Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpointAre baseline, group-specific final values and changes available?Required |
The preserved information for the selected outcome is follow-up between-group P=0.562. |
Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment |
Group-specific original baseline, day-56 and change values for use |
Separate use quantities from values/changes in other outcomes |
| 8 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N08 · Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpointAre between-group use effects and confidence intervals provided?Required |
The follow-up between-group use result, P=0.562, was described as null and was not counted as a benefit. |
Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment |
Use differences, ratios, effect scales, CIs and tests |
Present the original test alongside missing effects/intervals |
| 9 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N09 · Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpointWhat prespecified outcome hierarchy applies to use?Required |
Preserved follow-up evidence lists Schirmer and OSDI outcomes and mentions artificial-tear use separately in its results. |
Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment |
Primary, secondary or exploratory use outcome, plans and multiplicity |
Distinguish primary/secondary/exploratory outcomes and the use-analysis hierarchy |
| 10 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N10 · Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpointAre the measurement period and repeated units for use verified?Required |
Follow-up tear-volume/symptom assessments are recorded at day 56. Use appears in the same report, but its exact observation window is absent from the summary. |
Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment |
Baseline/day-56 use observation windows, records and repeated-measure handling |
Distinguish report assessment timing from actual use-observation windows |
| 11 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N11 · Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpointWhat policies governed permitted, rescue or changed artificial tears?Required |
The summary provides a use comparison but lacks details of permission, rescue, prescribing or participant-choice policies. |
Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment |
Permitted adjunctive care, products, rescue, changes and recording rules in both groups |
Distinguish adjunctive-care policy/actual use from the scope of product effects |
| 12 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N12 · Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpointAre follow-up allocation, analysis and withdrawal denominators distinguished?Required |
Follow-up evidence records 155 randomized and 116 analyzed. |
Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment |
Group-specific flow and exclusion reasons for 155 randomized and 116 analyzed |
Show randomized, analyzed and use-observation denominators separately |
| 13 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N13 · Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpointWas representative-trial complete-case analysis transferred to the follow-up?Required |
In 2021, 60 were randomized (30/30) with 59 in complete-case analysis. The follow-up separately had 155 randomized and 116 analyzed. |
Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment |
Original/follow-up analysis populations, denominators and missingness |
Distinguish each recruitment population and original analysis method |
| 14 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N14 · Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpointWhat is the scope of randomization, concealment and blinded use measurement?Required |
The follow-up is recorded as a multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial. |
Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment |
Follow-up allocation, measurement, artificial-tear records and blinding |
Distinguish design labels from actual implementation/use-measurement limitations |
| 15 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N15 · Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpointDo positive OSDI/Schirmer results mean reduced artificial-tear use?Required |
Representative-trial OSDI between-group P=0.0001 and Schirmer P<0.0001; both follow-up measures P<0.001. Artificial-tear use is separately null, P=0.562. |
Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment |
Outcome-specific direct results for symptoms, tear volume and adjunctive-care use |
Show distinct outcomes alongside the selected null result |
| 16 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N16 · Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpointWere representative OSDI baseline/final values converted into use quantities?Required |
Representative OSDI values are product 30.10±4.88→17.09±4.85 and placebo 32.54±5.06→31.00±7.18. |
Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment |
Distinguish scales/units and within-group/between-group estimands |
Separate symptom scales from adjunctive-care use quantities |
| 17 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N17 · Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpointAre clinically important test/symptom differences and use-reduction thresholds the same?Required |
The original summary says prespecified clinically important Schirmer-mm/OSDI thresholds and tabled 95% CIs were absent. |
Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment |
Use-outcome importance/interpretation criteria and direct intervals |
Distinguish test/symptom thresholds from direct use-outcome criteria |
| 18 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N18 · Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpointAre registration identifiers and external plans distinguished?Required |
The 2021 identifier is CTRI/2021/01/030493; the follow-up identifier is NCT05481450. |
Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment |
Representative CTRI/follow-up NCT and trial-specific plans/history |
Distinguish trial identifiers from actual reading/prespecified plans |
| 19 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N19 · Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpointDoes the same-formulation follow-up mean the same participants or independent-company replication?Required |
The representative single-center Indian trial had 60 participants; the four-center US follow-up had 155 in a separate study population. The original narrative describes shared company development/funding and no replication by independent investigators/funders. |
Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment |
Trial populations, centers, reports, funding and investigator links |
Distinguish separate recruitment populations from funding independence/replication scope |
| 20 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N20 · Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpointWas the fixed combination extended to single ingredients or other combinations?Required |
The original advertising interpretation concerns a fixed four-ingredient combination and says it cannot be extended to lutein, curcumin or vitamin D alone, or to other combinations. |
Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment |
Direct finished-product, ingredient and formulation comparisons |
Preserve the applicability of the fixed-combination question |
| 21 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N21 · Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpointDoes short-term use mean long-term adjunctive-care/disease-management benefit?Required |
Both preserved trials concern day 56/eight weeks; the selected use result is null in the follow-up report. |
Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment |
Direct follow-up of post-discontinuation use, long-term symptoms and clinical outcomes |
Distinguish short-term use/tests/symptoms from gaps in long-term direct outcomes |
| 22 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N22 · Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpointAre representative-trial funding, products, formulation development and employee authors distinguished?Required |
In 2021, OmniActive supported the trial, manufactured/supplied product and matched placebo, and participated in formulation development. Priyanka Radkar, Abhijeet Morde, Deshanie Rai and Muralidhara Padigaru were employees. |
Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment |
OmniActive support/manufacturing/supply/development/author relationships |
Show support separately from manufacturing/development/employee relationships |
| 23 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N23 · Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpointAre follow-up trial costs, publication fees, medical writing and editorial support separated?Required |
Original follow-up wording attributes trial costs to OmniActive and publication fees/medical-writing/editorial support to Bausch + Lomb. |
Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment |
Item-specific OmniActive and Bausch + Lomb roles |
Record trial operating costs separately from writing/publication support |
| 24 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N24 · Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpointAre follow-up employee authors and advisory-board relationships distinguished?Required |
Follow-up AM, DR and MP are recorded as OmniActive employees; RR and KB as Bausch + Lomb employees; NG, JG, JP and LP as Bausch + Lomb advisory-board members. |
Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment |
Author-specific company, employment, advisory and contribution relationships |
Show employee relationships separately from advisory/individual roles |
| 25 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N25 · Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpointWere all analysis, data and publication controls described as verified?Required |
Some support, product, development, writing, editorial and author relationships are preserved. |
Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment |
Trial-specific outsourced analysis, data rights, responsibility and publication roles |
Distinguish known involvement from unverified roles |
| 26 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N26 · Supplementary harm evidenceWhat actual trial scope underlies safety-collection wording?Supplementary |
The parent safety summary says hematology, chemistry, vital signs, physical examinations and AEs were assessed, with no safety issues or serious events reported. |
Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment |
Hematology, chemistry, vital signs, examinations, AEs and group-specific tables |
Distinguish safety-narrative scope from trial-specific observation denominators |
| 27 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N27 · Supplementary harm evidenceAre long-term/rare harms and soybean-oil comparator safety verified?Supplementary |
Short-term preserved results and representative soybean-oil placebo specifications are available. |
Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment |
Long-term exposure, rare events and population/product-specific harms |
Separate efficacy/use comparisons from long-term safety gaps |
| 28 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N28 · Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpointIs actual summary reading distinguished from unread external materials?Required |
The whole parent JSON was read; the two PubMed URLs are linked as original bibliography. |
Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment |
Bibliography, preserved JSON, abstract, full text, registration and plan statuses |
Show summary reading separately from material-specific external nonreading |
| 29 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N29 · Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpointAre original subclaim/parent history, production and user review distinguished?Required |
Preserve complete KO/EN, axes, the 2026-08-26 evidence date, empty corrections/deliberation and the selected row. Preserve original pending/eligible flags as history. |
Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment |
KO/EN, axes, dates, corrections, original selection and freeze/application |
Separate original verdict/corrections from condition freeze/application and user review |