| 1 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N01 · Evidence conditionWhich signs question does this evidence check cover?Required |
The existing selected question is improvement in selected staining or meibomian signs. The original account of formulation-specific signals from a small open multiple-outcome trial is retained. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Formulation-specific comparisons for improvement in selected staining and meibomian signs |
Material needed: Selected findings are not expanded into all signs or symptom effects. Original formulation, sign, control and time-specific tables, denominators and CIs require additional material. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 2 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N02 · Evidence conditionWhat does the staining signal with 16% drops represent?Required |
The principal trial records staining with drops P=.035 as a selected between-group signal. Exact staining effects, scales and CIs are absent from the stored summary. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Staining measurement with drops, between-group estimates, P values and CIs |
Material needed: Original staining sites, scales, assessors, time points, groups, denominators, effects and CIs remain unverified. The value is not converted into a symptom or gel result. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 3 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N03 · Evidence conditionWhat is the meibum quality signal with 98% gel?Required |
The original principal trial records gel meibum quality P=.005. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
The definition, assessment, between-group effect, P values and CIs for gel meibum quality |
Material needed: The same value is not copied to staining, gland expressibility or all signs. Grades, scales, assessment, expression methods, groups, denominators, time points, effects and CIs remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 4 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N04 · Evidence conditionWhat is the gland expressibility signal with 98% gel?Required |
The original principal trial records gel gland expressibility P=.042. It is retained as a separate sign from meibum quality. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Gland expressibility scales, measurement, between-group effects, P values and CIs |
Material needed: Gland selection, measurement, grades, assessors, groups, time points, denominators, effects and CIs remain unverified. New differences are not calculated. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 5 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N05 · Evidence conditionHow do P values differ from effect size and precision?Required |
The stored summary provides selected P values but does not retain exact formulation-specific effect sizes and intervals. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Sign-specific between-group estimates, variance and 95% CIs |
Material needed: P values alone do not newly verify large effects, precision, cure or equivalence. Original formulation-specific estimates, baseline and changes, denominators, variance, CIs and models remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 6 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N06 · Evidence conditionAre improvement in all groups and added sign effects distinguished?Required |
Improvement in all groups is the common-care context. Selected between-group sign signals and before-and-after improvement within each group are retained separately. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Direct comparison conditions for each formulation and sign versus common care |
Material needed: Overall recovery is not assigned to honey as an ingredient. Common care, formulation-specific baselines, time points, all results and between-group contrast tables remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 7 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N07 · Evidence conditionCan drops, gel, staining and gland measures be interchanged?Required |
The original account distinguishes staining with drops from meibomian measures with gel. The 3 P values link to different formulations and measures. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Matching 16% drop staining to 98% gel quality and expressibility |
Material needed: They are not pooled into a combined effect for one product or scale. Formulations, administration, scales, time points, group denominators and direct superiority comparisons remain unverified; formulation equivalence or superiority is not established. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 8 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N08 · Evidence conditionAre assessors and reproducibility of staining and meibum measurement verified?Required |
The original outcome list includes staining and meibum, but methods, scales, assessors and agreement are not detailed. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Original measurement, expression, assessment sites, scales and masking methods |
Material needed: Successful assessor masking is not newly added to an open trial. Tests, scales, sites, gland selection, assessors, photographs, video, measurement records and time points remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 9 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N09 · Evidence conditionHow do the open 3-group design, multiple outcomes and selected signals relate?Required |
The original selected explanation and principal report retain the limitation of a small open multiple-outcome trial. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Prespecified primary outcomes, multiple signs and time points, and multiplicity plans |
Material needed: Selected positive P values do not establish prespecified primary-outcome success or positive findings for all outcomes. Registration, protocols, analysis plans, all result tables and multiplicity remain unverified; no new official risk assessment is created. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 10 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N10 · Evidence conditionDoes the supporting trial's signs list also provide exact effects?Required |
The supporting trial's outcomes are 3-week SPEED, tear film, inflammation and staining. The stored result values are within-group SPEED changes. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Tear-film, inflammation and staining results from the 59-participant trial |
Material needed: SPEED values or P values are not copied into sign results. Original sign-specific results, time points, denominators, formulation, hierarchy, between-group effects and CIs remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 11 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N11 · Evidence conditionAre symptom superiority and sign signals different questions?Supplementary |
The parent and symptom question retain a gap in direct between-group symptom effects. Selected sign signals do not become symptom verification or new independent trials. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
The boundary of direct results for selected signs and the symptom question |
Material needed: Original symptom and sign tables, denominators, scales and matching within the same cohort remain unverified. Shared reports across the questions are not counted as separate independent replication. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 12 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N12 · Evidence conditionDo tear film, colonization and lubricant use share the same effect?Supplementary |
The principal trial's outcome list also includes tear film, colonization and lubricant use. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Separate outcomes for other ocular-surface measures, mechanisms and medication use |
Material needed: The selected 3 P values are not used as effects on remaining outcomes, clinical symptoms or infection prevention. Each original outcome, hierarchy, value, denominator and between-group contrast remains unverified; unrecorded effects or CIs are not created. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 13 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N13 · Evidence conditionHow are the principal 8 weeks, supporting 3 weeks and long-term recovery distinguished?Supplementary |
The original principal direct trial spans 8 weeks and the supporting trial 3 weeks. Durations from different reports are distinguished. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Sign-specific time points, exposure, post-stopping and long-term follow-up |
Material needed: Sign signals are not expanded into permanent gland recovery or long-term durability. Report-specific sign time points, administration, long-term and post-stopping course and direct results remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 14 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N14 · Evidence conditionHow are medical-grade sterile products distinguished from food honey?Required |
The original record concerns ophthalmic medical-grade products, not evidence for food-grade manuka honey or homemade dilution. Concentration differs from actual instilled amount and frequency. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Manufacture, quality and actual administration of medical-grade 16% drops and 98% gel |
Material needed: Product, sterility, ingredients, manufacture, dose, frequency and administration records remain unverified in detail. Medical-grade product records are not expanded into effects of food-grade or nonsterile products. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 15 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N15 · Evidence conditionWhat was added to common lid care?Required |
In 2017, all groups used common warm compresses, lid massage and preservative-free lubricant. The comparison added medical-grade honey products to that care. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Warm compresses, massage, preservative-free lubricant and formulation-specific additional care |
Material needed: It is not converted into evidence for stopping care or standalone treatment. Common-care rules, adherence, additional and rescue medications, formulation-specific matching and changes remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 16 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N16 · Evidence conditionAre MGD diagnosis and sample size the same information?Required |
The parent question concerns evaporative dry eye from meibomian gland dysfunction. 114 participants is the original sample-size label. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Diagnosis, severity, baseline status and group-specific eligibility in evaporative dry eye |
Material needed: Sample size does not replace diagnostic or eligibility criteria. Diagnosis, severity, baseline symptoms and signs, age, comorbidities and group-specific inclusion and exclusion remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 17 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N17 · Evidence conditionWhat are the selected-sign denominators in 114 participants and 3 groups?Required |
The principal trial's sample was 114 participants and its design was an open 3-group randomized trial. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Group allocation, completion, analysis and endpoint-specific eye and patient denominators |
Material needed: Group allocation, completion, formulations, care groups, endpoints, time points, bilateral-eye and patient denominators and exclusions remain unverified. Denominators absent from the original are not created. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 18 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N18 · Evidence conditionWhat denominators are 59 randomized and 55 completed?Required |
The supporting trial originally recorded 59 randomized and 55 completed. These values describe separate stages. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Supporting-trial allocation, completion, analysis and group, eye and patient endpoint denominators |
Material needed: Attrition counts or group-specific and endpoint-specific analysis denominators are not calculated or established. Group flow, reasons, time points and eye and patient denominators remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 19 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N19 · Evidence conditionWhat is the impact of missingness, attrition and measurement exclusions?Required |
Overall sample and completion records exist, but endpoint-specific missingness, attrition reasons and analysis conditions are not detailed. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Group flow, missing selected-sign outcomes, analysis populations and sensitivity analyses |
Material needed: Unread external material is not converted into absence of missingness. Missingness, stopping, exclusions, ITT and completer analyses, missing-data handling, sensitivity and group and eye matching remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 20 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N20 · Evidence conditionWhat were the baseline adjustment, change and testing conditions?Required |
Original P values and selected changes are retained, but detailed adjustment, variance, time points, denominators and effects of interest remain unread in external originals. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
The effect of interest, baseline adjustment, change and final values, and variance |
Material needed: Original analysis plans, statistical tables, baseline and changes, within-eye and within-person correlation, models and CIs remain unverified. New effects or CIs are not back-calculated. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 21 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N21 · Evidence conditionDoes a registration number also verify prespecified plans?Required |
Registration was unverified for the principal trial, while NCT04457648 was recorded for the supporting trial. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Registration, history, primary outcomes, changes and original plans for both trials |
Material needed: The number's existence is not promoted into registration reading in this work, prespecification, hierarchy at all time points or plan adherence. Official registration history, protocols and analysis plans were unread in this work. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 22 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N22 · Evidence conditionDo parent and subquestions share the same reports?Required |
The parent and subquestions share the same Albietz 2017 and Wong 2021 reports. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Report, trial and participant links between the symptom question and other questions |
Material needed: Sheet counts are not counted as new studies or independent replications. Report, trial, registration, sample, institution, timing and additional-report matching and unique trial and participant totals remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 23 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N23 · Evidence conditionIs independent replication across teams, products and formulations verified?Supplementary |
The bibliographies of both reports retain an Albietz author and the specific Optimel product context. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Unique trials and independent teams for the same selected signs, formulation, population, comparison and time point |
Material needed: Different reports or assessor masking alone do not newly establish independent teams or replication under the same conditions. Team, institution, product, funding, participant, effect and denominator matching remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 24 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N24 · Evidence conditionHow much is known about product provision and company involvement?Required |
The principal trial records Optimel product provision and related involvement; the supporting trial records a specific Optimel product, provision and author conflict disclosure. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Trial-specific funding, product support, employee authors and conflicts |
Material needed: Unrecorded funding, employee relationships, analysis and publication roles remain unverified. Product provision is not treated as verification of every involvement route or as absence of independence. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 25 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N25 · Evidence conditionWhat is the scope of reported stinging and redness?Supplementary |
The original record reports temporary stinging and redness and cautions that initial symptoms are possible even with medical-grade formulations. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Medical-grade product adverse reactions, collection methods, stopping and controls |
Material needed: Event counts, incidence or new causality are not created. Collection methods, group and formulation-specific events, severity, timing, stopping, missingness and controls remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 26 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N26 · Evidence conditionWhat are the eye and patient harm denominators and exposures?Supplementary |
114 participants, 59 randomized and 55 completed do not verify safety denominators. Concentrations, formulations, 3 and 8 weeks and common care are not combined as the same harm exposure. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Safety populations, eyes, patients, formulations, durations and actual instillation exposure |
Material needed: Safety denominators, actual instillation, group, eye and formulation-specific events, stopping, exposure and controls remain unverified. Incidence is not calculated. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 27 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N27 · Evidence conditionAre food or nonsterile risks distinguished from medical-grade product reactions?Supplementary |
The original caution distinguishes infection and corneal-injury risks with food-grade, nonsterile and homemade dilutions from initial stinging and redness with medical-grade products. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Manufacture, sterility, baseline eye conditions, other causes and clinical course |
Material needed: The food-honey self-instillation question is distinguished and no new case is created. Products, baseline eye conditions, concurrent use, event timing, alternative causes, controls and course remain unverified; no new harm causality is judged. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 28 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N28 · Evidence conditionAre long-term, rare and vulnerable-population harms verified?Supplementary |
Small short-term trials of specific products and descriptions of temporary reactions do not verify long-term, rare or vulnerable-population safety. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
Long exposure, independent harm reports, vulnerable populations and follow-up |
Material needed: Long follow-up, independent harm reports, vulnerable populations, exposure, denominators, concurrent use and course remain unverified. No external search or new harm judgment was performed in this work. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 29 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N29 · Evidence conditionHow does stored-summary reading differ from reading external originals?Required |
The complete parent Korean and English summary, reports and citations were read. PubMed URLs and registration numbers are existing records; external abstracts, full texts, registration, protocols and analysis plans were unread in this work. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
The complete stored summary and the reading scope for external abstracts, full texts, registration and plans |
Material needed: URLs, numbers and historical verification wording do not establish current reading, successful access or fulfilled conditions. External detailed-material availability, acquisition and actual reading remain separately unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 30 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N30 · Evidence conditionWhat do selected C, parent C46, dates and empty values record?Required |
The selected grade is C, with no individual score, status or axes fields. Parent C46, caution, axes, Korean and English records, 2026-09-07 and empty correction and deliberation records are preserved separately. |
This state links partial information and gaps in the preserved selected and parent accounts. External verification and clinical content review remain incomplete; it does not certify fulfilled conditions, efficacy, safety, prespecification or independence. |
The selected grade, absent individual score, parent axes, evidence date and corrections |
Material needed: The parent's 46 points are not assigned as a subclaim score, and the historical evidence date is not changed into a new search, external reading or completed-review date. New material, condition revisions and verdict changes are separate events. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |