| 1 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N01 · Evidence conditionWhat are the selected acute contrast-sensitivity question and original verdict?Required |
The selected question is “Small-letter contrast sensitivity about two hours after ingestion,” with original grade C and note “Positive difference of 0.15 logCS.” Subclaim score, status and axes are absent; parent C54 and lasting eyesight/eye-health questions are distinguished. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Selected wording, grade and note versus parent/long-term questions |
Material needed: Absent subclaim score, status and axes are not filled from parent values. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 2 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N02 · Evidence conditionWhat are the actual population and baseline visual conditions?Required |
S01 includes 30 adults without eye disease; the parent describes healthy young adults. This is not extended to restored eyesight in eye-disease patients or other ages. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Eligibility, age, eye disease, baseline vision and denominators |
Material needed: Exact age, sex, refraction/correction, baseline contrast sensitivity, recruitment and detailed eligibility are unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 3 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N03 · Evidence conditionHas the tested dark chocolate's identity been verified?Required |
The original text records a single serving of high-cacao, high-flavanol dark chocolate. Particular dark and milk products are compared; cacao percentage alone does not guarantee the same flavanol exposure. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Product, ingredients, amount and single research exposure |
Material needed: Product name, exact amount, composition/flavanol content and actual adherence are unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 4 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N04 · Evidence conditionAre food comparisons distinguished from isolated-ingredient effects?Required |
The direct comparison concerns two chocolate conditions. It is not converted into isolated flavanol effects, cacao-percentage effects or efficacy of general eye-health products. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Dark/milk differences, ingredient matching and direct comparison |
Material needed: Matching of sugar, fat, caffeine, calories and other ingredients, and isolated-ingredient attribution, are unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 5 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N05 · Evidence conditionWhat comparison does the milk-chocolate control represent?Required |
S01's control is milk chocolate. It is not used as an effect against no ingestion, placebo or other foods. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Control product, exposure, sensory features and concurrent conditions |
Material needed: Control amount, ingredients, taste, appearance, expectations, adherence and actual matching are unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 6 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N06 · Evidence conditionDo actual measurement timing and “about two hours” describe the same window?Required |
The original actual test was about 1.75 hours later; the selected wording says about 2 hours and the title within 2 hours. These are not made into new replications at different trials or follow-up times. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Ingestion/testing times, acute window and persistence |
Material needed: Individual test intervals, allowed timing window and subsequent duration are unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 7 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N07 · Evidence conditionHow was small-letter contrast sensitivity defined?Required |
The selected result is small-letter contrast sensitivity in logCS. It is distinguished from large-letter contrast, visual acuity in logMAR and everyday visual function. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Test task, letter size, units and equipment |
Material needed: Letter size, test distance, lighting, equipment, assessment procedure and baseline test definitions are unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 8 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N08 · Evidence conditionWhat are the original small-letter values, difference, CI and P value?Required |
Dark 1.45 versus milk 1.30 logCS and mean difference 0.15 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.22, P<.001) are preserved. No new calculation or transfer to other outcomes or lasting improvement is made. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Condition-specific values, estimate, denominator and original result |
Material needed: Exact eye/person analysis unit, denominator, model and baseline/order adjustments are unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 9 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N09 · Evidence conditionIs the nonsignificant large-letter result distinguished?Required |
The large-letter difference of 0.05 logCS (P=.07) is described as null. The positive small-letter difference of 0.15 logCS is not converted into large-letter success or improvement in all contrast sensitivity. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Outcome-specific effects, units and hierarchy |
Material needed: The exact large-letter CI, denominator, test conditions, model and prespecified hierarchy are unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 10 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N10 · Evidence conditionIs the borderline visual-acuity result in logMAR distinguished?Required |
The visual-acuity difference of 0.04 logMAR (P=.05) is described as borderline. It is not transferred to small-letter contrast units/effects or confirmed restoration of eyesight. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Acuity result, direction, units and hierarchy |
Material needed: Exact acuity direction, condition-specific values, CI, denominator and test definitions are unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 11 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N11 · Evidence conditionHave single masking and participant recognition of conditions been verified?Required |
The original design is a randomized single-masked within-person crossover trial. The original text says participants could recognize chocolate types. This is not extended to masking of all participants, assessors and analysts. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Who was masked, maintenance, testing and analysis conditions |
Material needed: Who was masked, maintenance, expectation differences and assessor/analyst knowledge of conditions are unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 12 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N12 · Evidence conditionHave crossover-session order and within-person analysis been verified?Required |
Thirty healthy adults consumed dark and milk chocolate in separate sessions in a within-person crossover trial. Sequence generation, washout and control of period effects are not all described as verified. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Sequence generation, concealment, session interval and within-person analysis |
Material needed: Sequence generation/concealment, session intervals and order/period models are unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 13 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N13 · Evidence conditionHave learning, period and carryover effects been verified?Required |
Visual tests in two conditions are repeated within the same people. The design's control of individual differences is preserved without filling gaps with absence of learning, period or carryover effects. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Repeated testing, baseline, washout and period matching |
Material needed: Practice/baseline testing, test order and handling of learning/carryover are unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 14 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N14 · Evidence conditionAre people, eyes, conditions and repeated measurements distinguished?Required |
The original participant count is 30 people with two single-exposure conditions. Eyes, conditions and repeated measurements are not added as new participants, independent trials or denominators. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Analysis units, clustering/correlation and denominators |
Material needed: Tested eyes, use of both eyes, eye-level data, repeat counts and within-person/between-eye correlation models are unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 15 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N15 · Evidence conditionHave completion, missingness and analysis populations been verified?Required |
The original count of 30 adults without eye disease is preserved. Complete data for every session/outcome and ITT/PP analyses are not created from the stored summary alone. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Session/outcome-specific completion, exclusions and missing-data handling |
Material needed: Session/outcome-specific completion, missingness, exclusions, analysis denominators and handling reasons are unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 16 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N16 · Evidence conditionWhat is the scope of the mean difference and within-person estimate?Required |
The parent records a mean difference of 0.15 logCS and a within-person crossover effect. No new standardized effects, response rates, CIs or individual benefits are calculated. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Reported effects, covariates, model and units |
Material needed: Exact adjusted model, covariates, eye/person units and variance/correlation structure are unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 17 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N17 · Evidence conditionAre registration identifiers distinguished from actual registry reading?Required |
NCT03326934 in the evidence and citation lists is preserved. The number alone does not establish registry reading now, verification of a prerecruitment plan or prespecification of every outcome. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Original registration identifier, changes and actual reading dates |
Material needed: Exact registration/recruitment timing, original registration, change history and protocol remain unread. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 18 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N18 · Evidence conditionHave prior hierarchy and multiple visual outcomes been verified?Required |
The original text distinguishes the main small-letter signal from borderline/null other measures. The parent's grouped acuity/large-letter/small-letter endpoints are not used as proof of a prerecruitment first endpoint or multiplicity plan. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
First endpoint, SAP and testing/adjustment plan |
Material needed: Prerecruitment hierarchy, test direction, multiplicity, SAP and changes are unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 19 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N19 · Evidence conditionAre acute functional testing and clinical importance distinguished?Required |
The parent records a clear acute small-letter psychophysical signal. The statement that the CI excluded 0 is not transferred to everyday visual benefit, restored eyesight or clinical eye-health efficacy. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Relevance threshold, everyday function and clinical endpoints |
Material needed: Prespecified relevance thresholds, everyday function and patient clinical endpoints remain unlinked. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 20 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N20 · Evidence conditionHave persistence and repeated-ingestion results been verified?Required |
The original text records one test about 1.75 hours later, with duration and repeated-ingestion effects not measured/tested. This is not extended to lasting eyesight or eye-health improvement. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Distinguishing the acute time point from repeated/long-term outcomes |
Material needed: Later persistence, repeated exposure and long-term clinical function/safety remain unlinked. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 21 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N21 · Evidence conditionAre direct data available for other populations?Required |
The direct population is healthy adults without eye disease. The same efficacy is not generalized to eye-disease patients, impaired vision, other ages or living conditions. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Direct data by age, eye disease and baseline function |
Material needed: Contrast-sensitivity, clinical-function and safety data in other populations remain unlinked. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 22 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N22 · Evidence conditionHave concurrent meals, environment and testing conditions been verified?Required |
These are acute test data from two chocolate conditions. The stored summary is not extended to identical other meals, drinks, medicines, visual correction or test environments. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Records of meals, medicines, lifestyle, lighting and visual correction |
Material needed: Concurrent exposures before/after ingestion, test lighting/timing, correction conditions and adherence are unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 23 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N23 · Evidence conditionWhat is the verification scope for funding, product support and commercial involvement?Required |
The funding record states “University research team; no commercial manufacturer involvement identified in the report.” This limited statement is not converted into absence of product support, employee authors or all competing interests. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Separate originals for support, employee authors and competing interests |
Material needed: Full original funding roles, product/free support, employee authors and competing-interest disclosures are unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 24 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N24 · Evidence conditionWhat is the safety scope of a single food exposure?Supplementary |
Parent safety is “Good,” but the original text says this was not a systematic safety trial of a single exposure. Wording about product/person differences in allergy, caffeine sensitivity, sugar and calories is not used as new incidence estimates or safety certification. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Adverse-event collection, exposure, denominators and discontinuation |
Material needed: Event definitions, collection, denominators, discontinuation, vulnerable populations and long-term safety are unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 25 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N25 · Evidence conditionHow are reports, crossover conditions and independent trials distinguished?Required |
Thirty people, two conditions and multiple visual outcomes in the single Rabin 2018 report belong to the same trial. Eyes, conditions, repeated tests, the registration number and other visual measures are not counted as independent trials or participant totals. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Report, population, conditions and independent-trial relationships |
Material needed: Separate replications using the same product/time/endpoint and actual independent-family relationships remain unlinked. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 26 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N26 · Evidence conditionAre subclaim/parent verdicts, original values and history distinguished?Required |
Parent C54, B/S/R1/I2/E+/B2/C0, four false flags, empty override reasons and subclaim C/note are preserved. Original Korean/English text, 2026-09-07, empty corrections/deliberation and historical PubMed/PMCID/effect checks are not inherited as current clinical review or a subclaim score. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Parent C54, subclaim C, corrections and historical review |
Material needed: Subclaim score, status and axes are absent; new corrections and details of historical review are unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 27 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N27 · Evidence conditionAre stored summaries, external links and later updates distinguished?Required |
The stored summary/bibliography were used for production and the original paper link retained. External abstracts, full text, registration, protocols, SAPs and competing-interest disclosures remain unread; no external access or source-link testing was performed. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Actual summary use, unread external material and additional sources |
Material needed: External original acquisition, actual reading, source-link verification and review of existing content remain incomplete. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |