| 1 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N01 · Evidence conditionWhich MRI claim is selected?Required |
The selected claim is reduced MRI-measured liver fat. Its original grade is ? and its note says this was not an outcome measured by the trial. Subclaim score, status and axes are unrecorded and distinguished from the parent ALT/FibroScan verdict C50. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
The existing MRI liver-fat-reduction claim and verdict record |
Material needed: Definitions, population, comparator, time points and denominators for direct MRI measurement, and review of the existing claim boundary, are needed. The ? does not mean zero effect, zero points or absence of all human research. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 2 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N02 · Evidence conditionWas MRI liver fat directly measured?Required |
The existing crux, summary note and subclaim note record that the trial did not measure MRI liver fat. MRI values, between-group changes, CIs and measurement denominators are not filled using ALT/FibroScan findings. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Unmeasured MRI and the direct-evidence gap |
Material needed: Actual MRI liver-fat methods, quantification, units, baseline and follow-up measurements, comparator, denominators and CIs are needed. An unmeasured outcome is not a test showing no effect. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 3 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N03 · Evidence conditionDoes ALT P=.006 establish an MRI liver-fat effect?Required |
Original ALT P=.006 is a covariate-adjusted liver-enzyme result, not MRI fat quantity, change or a CI. It is not converted into an MRI liver-fat-reduction effect or amount of normalization. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Distinguishing liver enzymes from a direct MRI endpoint |
Material needed: Original ALT tables and separate direct MRI data, definitions, models, denominators and CIs are needed. Original P values are preserved without new effect or fat-quantity calculations. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 4 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N04 · Evidence conditionIs FibroScan P=.001 the same measurement as MRI?Required |
The original wording of FibroScan fibrosis score P=.001 and the existing explanation that it differs from MRI are preserved. Actual measure, units and device algorithm are unverified and are not converted into MRI fat quantity. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Distinguishing the actual FibroScan measure from MRI methods |
Material needed: FibroScan definitions and valid measurements, direct MRI quantification methods, and their respective denominators, models and CIs are needed. A device name alone does not establish fat measurement or histologic effects. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 5 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N05 · Evidence conditionAre MRI, MRS, other imaging and histologic outcomes individually verified?Required |
The existing advertising analysis cautions against adding unmeasured MRI or histologic liver-fat findings. Detailed MRS, other imaging and histologic results and values are also not verified as separate direct outcomes in the stored summary. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Actual measurement by each imaging method and histologic indicator |
Material needed: Actual performance, purpose, definitions, units, time points, denominators and CIs for each method or histologic measure are needed. Unverified information is not replaced with confirmed performance or a zero result. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 6 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N06 · Evidence conditionDoes the null AST result establish a null MRI fat result?Required |
AST P=.98 is the original null liver-enzyme test result. It is not transferred into zero MRI effect or equivalence for an unmeasured outcome, or obscured by favorable ALT findings. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Distinguishing AST P=.98 from other unmeasured tests |
Material needed: Test-specific values, denominators, between-group effects, CIs, prespecified hierarchy and separate MRI data are needed. No new conversion between tests is made. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 7 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N07 · Evidence conditionAre clinical liver-disease outcomes and MRI measurements the same endpoint?Required |
The Korean text says whether marker changes lead to cirrhosis or hospitalization is unknown; the English text says clinical liver events were not tested. MRI fat quantity is also distinct from clinical-event effects and was not directly measured in this trial. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Clinical outcomes such as cirrhosis or hospitalization and direct MRI evidence |
Material needed: Clinical-event definitions, adjudication, long-term follow-up, group-specific time at risk, denominators, effects, CIs and direct MRI data are needed. No conversion into zero events or treatment efficacy is made. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 8 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N08 · Evidence conditionIs the MASLD population the same as the separate NAFLD seed trial?Required |
The main trial involved 80 adults with overweight or obesity and MASLD. The 2016 supporting safety citation concerns NAFLD seed intervention and anthropometry. Differences in diagnosis, disease stage, baseline imaging, medication and formulation are not merged into evidence for the same MRI efficacy question. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Distinguishing the overweight/obese MASLD population from another seed trial |
Material needed: Report-specific populations, diagnoses, baseline imaging, liver disease, medication, interventions, durations and direct MRI evidence are needed. No generalization to every liver disease or formulation is made. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 9 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N09 · Evidence conditionCan common diet advice and comparator conditions substitute for MRI effects?Required |
The 10g/day interventions, ground-wheat comparator, weight-loss diet and physical-activity advice in both groups are original study conditions. Common advice or weight changes are not assumed to establish MRI liver-fat improvement, an isolated effect or a comparison with no treatment. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
The psyllium versus ground-wheat comparison and common lifestyle advice |
Material needed: Actual diet, activity, weight, medication, adherence, comparator, exposure and direct MRI measurement data are needed. No new diet, liver-disease-management or intake advice is created. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 10 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N10 · Evidence conditionAre 80 randomized and 78 completed MRI measurement denominators?Required |
80 randomized and 78 completed describe participation in the main trial, not numbers or denominators measured by MRI. Time points, tests and report counts are not added as independent trials or participants. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Distinguishing randomized/completed counts from an unmeasured endpoint denominator |
Material needed: Group-specific randomization, valid scans, missingness, analysis flow, effects and CIs from direct MRI research are needed. No new valid MRI denominator, dropout count or dropout rate is calculated. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 11 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N11 · Evidence conditionDoes ten-week study exposure show sustained MRI effects?Required |
Ten weeks, psyllium10g/day and ground wheat10g/day identify the original efficacy trial. With MRI unmeasured, no ten-week MRI effect, persistence, subsequent fat quantity or long-term safety is created. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Duration, actual exposure and post-trial follow-up |
Material needed: Direct MRI baseline, follow-up and post-trial data, actual exposure, denominators, comparator and duration are needed. No product-intake, maintenance or treatment-replacement instructions are created. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 12 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N12 · Evidence conditionDid registration or the prespecified endpoint hierarchy include MRI?Required |
The original record leaves effect size, prespecified primary-endpoint hierarchy and registration unverified; MRI was not a measured endpoint. Registration identifiers or plans are not invented to verify MRI as a prespecified or later endpoint. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Distinguishing unverified registration/prespecified endpoints from unmeasured MRI |
Material needed: Original registration and amendment history, protocols, SAPs, actual endpoints, time points and direct MRI design data are needed. External registration and planning materials remain unread. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 13 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N13 · Evidence conditionCan P values from other tests fill MRI effects or CIs?Required |
MRI values, direct effects and CIs remain a gap because MRI was not measured. Covariate-adjusted ALT/FibroScan P values and the parent verdict's interpretation do not provide quantitative MRI evidence. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Direct estimates, within/between-group comparisons and unmeasured outcomes |
Material needed: Direct MRI group values, baseline, changes, adjusted estimates, 95%CIs, units, denominators and clinical importance are needed. No new calculations, hypothetical examples or effect sizes are created. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 14 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N14 · Evidence conditionWhat direct evidence would address the MRI gap?Required |
The current record contains selected ten-week liver-test signals and unmeasured MRI. Other surrogates or the separate seed safety citation do not fill this gap; needed direct MRI materials are identified. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
MRI measurements addressing the same question |
Material needed: MRI liver-fat methods, baseline, follow-up, denominators, effects, CIs, actual exposure and harms for the same formulation, common advice, comparator and selected MASLD population are needed. Only research needs are recorded; no new research, calculation or regrading is performed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 15 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N15 · Evidence conditionAre the same reports, participants or time points counted as independent evidence?Required |
Parent2985 and the ALT/FibroScan and MRI sheets share the Akbarzadeh2026 efficacy-trial context and Akbarian2016 supporting safety citation. Tests, conditions and time points from the same participants are not added as new independent trials or people. Unique-trial and total unique-participant counts remain unverified. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Links between parent/subclaims and reports/studies |
Material needed: Links between efficacy/safety reports, cohorts, actual interventions, analysis populations and time points are needed. Material-item counts are not unique-trial or participant counts or quality scores. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 16 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N16 · Evidence conditionWhich materials were actually read?Required |
The complete stored parent-verdict summary was read for production and an exact whole-byte copy preserved. External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocols and SAPs remain unread. URLs or PMCIDs are not treated as verification of reading, access or condition fulfillment. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Distinguishing the complete stored parent summary from external material |
Material needed: Acquisition and reading records for actual full texts, supplements, plans and registration materials are needed. External source-link access and operation were not tested. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 17 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N17 · Evidence conditionWhere are citation and registration identifiers recorded?Required |
The 2026 efficacy citation has PMID42621560, PMCID PMC13489564 and DOI10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_254_24. The 2016 supporting citation has PMID27761216, PMCID PMC5070040 and DOI10.4103/2008-7802.191865. Neither citation/evidence record contains a separate registration identifier. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
PMID, PMCID and DOI for each citation |
Material needed: Exact original bibliographic, study and registration identifiers, content and dates are needed. Full-text or registration URLs are not newly inferred from a PMCID. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 18 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N18 · Evidence conditionAre historical bilingual and cross-check records distinguished from this review?Required |
Bilingual text, subclaims, notes and historical Codex PubMed/PMC/scoring checks and verification statements in citation summaries are preserved. This production uses stored summaries; external material is unread and existing content, model and claim-boundary reviews remain incomplete. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Original bilingual wording, subclaim records and historical verification |
Material needed: Existing review of original text, translation, corrections and claim boundaries is needed. Historical verification is not presented as completed current clinical review, new calculations or independence certification. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 19 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N19 · Evidence conditionAre the subclaim record and parent C50/axes distinguished?Required |
The selected original grade/note and absent score, status and axes are retained. Parent C50, Caution, B/S/R1/I2/EX/B2 and unrecorded precision are parent context. They do not fill the selected MRI liver-fat score or axes or certify independence. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Subclaim grade/note and absent score/status/axes |
Material needed: Existing review of the selected subclaim and original parent values is needed. No new score, axes, efficacy grade or verdict change is created. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 20 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N20 · Evidence conditionAre the original evidence date and empty corrections distinguished from production?Required |
Original evidence date2026-09-07, the empty correction array and empty deliberation string are retained. This is not a production or review date or certification that no external corrections exist. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Original evidence date and empty correction/deliberation values |
Material needed: Follow-up/correction materials and the complete pre-change original and event history are needed. Absent dates or correction values are not invented. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 21 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N21 · Evidence conditionAre funding, support, employee authors and analysis roles distinguished?Required |
The main funding record reports academic Isfahan University research and no conflicts. It does not mean product support, company-employee authors or company analysis/reporting involvement are all verified. Funding details for the 2016 supporting citation are separately unrecorded. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Company-related items and report-specific verification scope |
Material needed: Report-specific funding, COI, product/ingredient support, author affiliations and analysis/publication roles are needed. Parent I2 is not used as new independence certification. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 22 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N22 · Evidence conditionAre allocation, measurement, missingness and selective-reporting details verified?Required |
The main trial used block randomization and records covariate adjustment and limitations of completer-focused analysis. Allocation concealment, blinding, test devices/validity, missingness, covariate prespecification and selective-reporting details remain separately unverified. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Boundaries of block randomization, covariate adjustment and completer analysis |
Material needed: Original methods, protocols, SAPs, registration/amendment history, test tables, denominators and models are needed. Design names or objective tests alone do not establish formal RoB/GRADE or completed review. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 23 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N23 · Evidence conditionDoes common lifestyle advice establish actual concurrent exposure?Required |
Weight-loss-diet and physical-activity advice common to both arms is an original condition. Actual diet, activity, weight changes, medication, product exposure, adherence and withdrawal details remain unverified; their joint contribution is not established. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Weight-loss diet, physical activity, adherence and co-management |
Material needed: Actual concurrent exposure, weight, diet, activity, baseline/follow-up medication, exposure, adherence and denominators are needed. No diet, intake or liver-disease-management instructions are created. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 24 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N24 · Harm-information gaps supplementing the efficacy tableWhich formulation or group had withdrawals in the supporting safety citation?Supplementary |
The 2016 citation reports some withdrawals for constipation, nausea or abdominal pain in a separate NAFLD seed intervention. Exact groups, products, counts, exposure denominators and durations are unverified. All withdrawals are not assigned to the current psyllium10g/day trial. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Links between the 2016 seed intervention, withdrawals and harms |
Material needed: That report's formulations, ingredients, group-specific events, withdrawals, reasons, durations, harm collection and exposure denominators are needed. A different safety citation is not converted into independent efficacy replication or the original trial's harm rate. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 25 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N25 · Harm-information gaps supplementing the efficacy tableAre caution statements, observed harms and long-term safety the same?Supplementary |
Potential gas, bloating, abdominal pain, constipation or nausea and swallowing, narrowing and obstruction boundaries are existing safety statements. Harm collection, group-specific events, exposure denominators, CIs, long-term and rare harms remain separately unverified. Original adequate-fluid wording is preserved without creating new fluid quantities, intake methods or treatment advice. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Potential harms, collection methods, denominators and specific risk groups |
Material needed: Report-specific harm definitions, active collection, group exposure, denominators, withdrawals, attrition and long-term risk-group data are needed. Caution is not converted into safety, no harm or a new established incidence rate. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |
| 26 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N26 · Evidence conditionWhich new materials would prompt an update to this table?Required |
This table transfers the stored MRI liver-fat summary. Related observations can be updated after review of original tables, actual test measures/units, direct imaging, histology, clinical endpoints, between-group effects, denominators, concurrent exposures and harms. |
The selected claim, parent material and reports are distinguished and transferred from the stored summary. Detailed original material is unverified and review of existing content remains incomplete. This does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Separate records for original materials, conditions, observations and verdict changes |
Material needed: The complete pre-change original, original materials, condition versions, separate application and change-decision records are needed. No new clinical research, calculation, regrading, independence certification, intake, diet, liver-disease-management or treatment-replacement advice is created. This records needed materials; no new research was executed. |