| 1 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N01 · Evidence conditionWhich existing work limb-symmetry claim is being transferred?Required |
The selected question is improved 24-week work limb-symmetry index. The original subclaim grade D/note says the CI upper bound excluded the +10-percentage-point power assumption, which was not a validated clinical threshold. Absent subclaim score/status/axes are separated from parent D34/axes. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Selected wording, subclaim grade D and parent context |
Materials needed: Materials for the selected measure/estimand, timepoint/denominator, clinical threshold and existing question-boundary review. Parent scores are not used to fill the subclaim. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 2 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N02 · Evidence conditionWhich acute rupture population?Required |
PATH-2 involved 230 patients suitable for nonoperative treatment of complete acute midsubstance rupture within 12 days, at 19 UK NHS hospitals. This is not extended to chronic tendinopathy, partial rupture, surgical augmentation or other populations. Existing topic-classification wording is preserved in the complete summary without replacing the population definition. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Complete acute midsubstance rupture within 12 days; nonoperative care |
Materials needed: Eligibility/exclusion, injury/diagnosis, baseline function, comorbidities/treatment and direct materials for other populations. No PRP/tendon-management instructions. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 3 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N03 · Evidence conditionWhat was the study PRP exposure?Required |
The original intervention added one autologous PRP injection to acute nonoperative treatment. PRP composition, cell/platelet quantities, volume/manufacturing and actual exposure are not established in the summary. This is not extended to other preparations or repeated-injection effects. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
One autologous PRP injection versus other preparations/repeated injections |
Materials needed: Original study-product/composition, manufacturing/quantities, actual-exposure and adherence/deviation materials. No blood-draw/manufacturing/injection procedures or product recommendations. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 4 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N04 · Evidence conditionAre the comparator and common procedures preserved as research context?Required |
The original study description says both groups received local anesthesia, blood draw and the same immobilization/rehabilitation, while the control had needle insertion only into the rupture gap. This is research context, not procedural guidance; the control is not changed to no treatment or another active injection. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Imitation dry needling and common local anesthesia/blood draw |
Materials needed: Actual PRP/imitation procedure, concurrent-care/exposure, masking and deviation materials. No new injection/blood-draw/rehabilitation procedures are authored. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 5 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N05 · Evidence conditionDoes identical immobilization/rehabilitation imply identical actual adherence?Required |
The original materials record identical immobilization/rehabilitation. Actual implementation/adherence, crossover/rescue/additional care and return-to-sport/exercise exposure remain unverified in detail. PRP-alone/rehabilitation-alone effects or identical actual exposure between groups are not newly certified. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Concurrent-care plans and actual exposure |
Materials needed: Group-specific actual concurrent care, exposure/adherence, deviations/crossover/rescue and baseline/recovery materials. No exercise/rehabilitation plans or treatment-replacement guidance. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 6 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N06 · Evidence conditionAre allocation counts distinguished from functional-test/harms denominators?Required |
Original allocation was 230 participants, 114/116. Detailed 24-week functional-test observation/analysis and completion/dropout remain unverified; harms denominators 84/113 and 90/116 are separate. Allocation/harms denominators are not used to fill primary-test denominators. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
230 allocated, 114/116; endpoint-specific observation |
Materials needed: Original group flow, 24-week test observation/analysis, missingness/imputation/dropout and harms-exposure denominators. No new dropout counts/rates or summing of limbs/tests. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 7 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N07 · Evidence conditionWhat are the work limb-symmetry test and units?Required |
The original primary endpoint is the injured/uninjured limb-symmetry index for maximal work during the heel-rise endurance test at 24 weeks. Existing research-product information records injured/uninjured ×100, higher is better. Only the formula is preserved; no actual patient/test-value calculation or test-procedure guidance. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Maximal heel-rise work; injured/uninjured ×100 |
Materials needed: Original test definitions/standardization, work units/measurement, limb denominators, interpretation/repetition and analysis materials. This is not equated with height, repetitions or a total score. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 8 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N08 · Evidence conditionAre group indices distinguished from percentage-point between-group differences?Required |
At 24 weeks the index was PRP 34.67% versus imitation dry needling 38.54%, with adjusted difference −3.87 percentage points. Percentages versus percentage points and group estimates versus between-group adjustment are distinguished. No within-group recovery/absolute work, new unadjusted difference or ratio is calculated. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
34.67% versus 38.54%; adjusted difference |
Materials needed: Original group baseline/final values, index/work variation, estimand/adjusted model and denominators/missingness. No new difference/CI calculation. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 9 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N09 · Evidence conditionWhat are the original primary effect, CI and P?Required |
Original adjusted mean difference −3.87 percentage points (CI −10.45–2.71), P=.23 is a null 24-week functional result, with PRP lower. This does not newly establish harms, equivalence/noninferiority or exclusion of all benefits. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
−3.87%p·CI−10.45~2.71·P=.23 |
Materials needed: Original estimation model, adjustment/variation, estimand, tests/CI and clinical-importance/denominator materials. No new effect/CI/P or invented quantities. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 10 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N10 · Evidence conditionHow far is the relationship between +10 percentage points and the CI upper bound preserved?Required |
The existing reader answer/core summary records that the observed CI upper bound +2.71 percentage points excluded the +10-percentage-point benefit used in sample-size planning. That comparison/wording is preserved without new tests/calculations or extension to excluding benefits of every magnitude. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Sample-size/power assumption and original exclusion statement |
Materials needed: Original sample-size plans, effect assumption/source, test/CI and estimand materials. +10 percentage points is not used as an observed effect or a subgroup/other-endpoint effect. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 11 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N11 · Evidence conditionIs +10 percentage points a validated minimum clinically important difference?Required |
Existing research-product information/verdict reasons explicitly state that +10 percentage points was a power assumption drawn from an earlier trial, not a validated minimum clinically important difference. Parent precision C0 and the single null-trial scope are retained; no new clinical-importance threshold is set. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Previous-trial observation versus clinical threshold |
Materials needed: Externally validated clinical thresholds/patient importance, prespecification, exact effects/CI and applicability materials. No new MCID, score or grade. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 12 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N12 · Evidence conditionAre objective functional testing and patient reports separated?Required |
The original primary endpoint is an objective muscle-tendon function test; ATRS is separate patient-reported-function context. The two scores/units, timepoints and hierarchy are not averaged/summed as the same effect. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
24-week work index and ATRS |
Materials needed: Original instruments/tests, scores/clinical importance, denominators/timepoints and prespecified plans. Index values are not converted to patient-symptom/daily-function values. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 13 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N13 · Evidence conditionAre original 24-week ATRS values preserved separately?Supplementary |
Original 24-week ATRS 64.99 versus 65.53, adjusted difference −0.54 (CI −4.90–3.81), P=.81 was null. This is a different endpoint from work-index −3.87 percentage points/CI/P; denominator, exact hierarchy and model details remain unverified. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
64.99 versus 65.53; adjusted difference −.54 |
Materials needed: Original ATRS definitions, group values/variation, estimand/hierarchy, denominator/missingness and clinical thresholds. Percentage-point/LSI effects are not copied to ATRS. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 14 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N14 · Evidence conditionWhat are the original two-year ATRS values from the same trial?Supplementary |
Original two-year ATRS was 82.2 versus 83.8, adjusted difference −0.752 (CI −5.523–4.020), P=.757, a null result. This long-term report follows the same trial/registrations/participants and is not new independent replication. No new difference is calculated from original adjusted differences or rounded group values. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
82.2 versus 83.8; adjusted difference −.752 |
Materials needed: Original two-year observation/analysis denominators, follow-up loss/missingness, ATRS plans/models and exposure/harms. Long-term effects/CI are not transferred to 24-week LSI. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 15 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N15 · Evidence conditionIs the two-year report defined as long-term repetition of the objective test?Required |
The original long-term description concerns ATRS. Two-year work limb-symmetry index/other objective tests, denominators and results are not provided within the currently preserved scope. Null ATRS from the same trial is not copied as a null result for every long-term functional test. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Long-term ATRS and unverified long-term work testing |
Materials needed: Complete long-term measurements/results, test-specific denominators/timepoints and plans/effects/CI. Unread materials are not declared to show that other tests were unmeasured. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 16 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N16 · Evidence conditionAre ITT/multiple-imputation sensitivity analyses separated from actual missingness?Required |
The original materials record ITT analysis and prespecified multiple-imputation sensitivity checks for missing 24-week data. Detailed group-specific missingness/test availability, dropout/imputation models and sensitivity values remain unverified. ITT is not changed to complete observation or zero missing-data bias. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Allocated-group primary analysis and prespecified imputation checks |
Materials needed: Group flow, observed/analyzed/imputed denominators, missingness reasons, imputation assumptions/sensitivity and long-term follow-up. No new missing counts/rates or reanalysis. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 17 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N17 · Evidence conditionAre original allocation/masking roles preserved?Required |
Original materials distinguish secure central web allocation, revealed only to the injector after enrollment, participant/assessor masking and inability to mask injectors. Functional-assessor masking is not extended to masking of every role. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Central web allocation; participant/assessor masking |
Materials needed: Original allocation concealment/implementation, masking success/unmasking, assessment/missingness/deviation materials. Original B0/robust-design wording is parent history; no official RoB review is performed here. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 18 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N18 · Evidence conditionAre primary plans/registration distinguished from long-term report hierarchy?Required |
Original agreement of the objective 24-week primary function with NCT02302664/ISRCTN54992179 and prospective-registration wording are preserved. Shared registration in long-term reporting does not certify an independent trial; detailed two-year/secondary-endpoint plans and changes remain unread. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
NCT/ISRCTN and the same PATH-2 registrations |
Materials needed: Registration/protocol/SAP versions/timing, 24-week/long-term endpoints, analysis/multiplicity and changes. No guessed official URLs or new certification of prespecification. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 19 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N19 · Evidence conditionIs a null superiority trial interpreted as equivalence/noninferiority?Required |
The original evidence-list design is a blinded placebo-controlled superiority trial. Original null-result/exclusion-of-the-+10-percentage-point-power-assumption wording does not newly establish equivalence/noninferiority or absence of all clinical benefits. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Original superiority design, effect and importance |
Materials needed: Prespecified superiority/estimand, original CI/importance and externally validated clinical thresholds. No new invented values, grade or clinical certification. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 20 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N20 · Harm-information gaps supplementing the efficacy tableAre complication denominators distinguished from total event counts?Supplementary |
Original at-least-one-complication figures are 84/113 (74%) versus 90/116 (78%). People with at least one event are separate from total event counts/types, allocation 114/116 and functional-test denominators. No new event total, rate or risk difference is calculated. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
At least one complication: 84/113 versus 90/116 |
Materials needed: Original group harms denominators/exposure, event/reporter definitions, collection/grading, discontinuation/relatedness and periods. This is not converted to an index effect or absence of all harms. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 21 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N21 · Harm-information gaps supplementing the efficacy tableAre original rerupture/DVT and myocardial-infarction descriptions separated?Supplementary |
Original harms wording records similar rerupture/deep-vein thrombosis and one ST-elevation myocardial infarction 2.5 hours after PRP injection, with a possible indirect relation acknowledged. Type-specific denominators/effects/CI remain unverified; temporal proximity is not changed to definite causation or no relation. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Similarity; one STEMI 2.5 hours later; possible indirect relation |
Materials needed: Event-specific collection/denominators, exposure/timing, clinical course/alternative causes, relatedness/discontinuation and long-term materials. No new harms rates/causal calculations or blood-draw/injection/treatment procedures. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 22 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N22 · Evidence conditionIs acute rupture extended to chronic tendinopathy/other PRP?Required |
Existing advertising-interpretation wording is limited to one added injection in nonoperative acute complete midsubstance rupture care. Existing counterpoint 1699 is preserved only as context for a separate chronic-tendinopathy verdict, without reading/transferring it here. This is not extended to other preparations, repeated injections or surgical augmentation. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Boundaries across population, preparation, repeated injections and surgery |
Materials needed: Direct population/formulation/comparator, function/harms, periods/denominators/effects/CI for each other question. No PRP/tendon-treatment replacement or exercise/rehabilitation/injection instructions. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 23 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N23 · Evidence conditionWhat is the actual scope of reading/acquisition?Required |
The complete parent summary was read for production and preserved in its original form. Summary reading concerns preserved materials; external abstracts/full texts/registrations/protocols/SAP remain unread. Original citation/URL existence is not upgraded to external reading in this work. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Preserved summary and external materials |
Materials needed: Records of actual material acquisition/reading scope, versions and dates. No external-link/click/access testing. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 24 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N24 · Evidence conditionAre historical registration/prespecification and current reading separated?Required |
Original NCT02302664/ISRCTN54992179, 24-week-primary agreement and prospective-registration wording are preserved; the two-year report follows the same registrations. Actual versions/plans/access remain unread here; official URLs are not guessed. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Original registration identifiers, timing and plans |
Materials needed: Actual registration versions/publication, recruitment/start/changes, endpoints/models/analyses and links to original reports. Only history is preserved; no current plan/prespecification certification. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 25 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N25 · Evidence conditionHave protocol/SAP and analysis/missing-data plans been acquired?Required |
Original primary/analysis/registration descriptions and historical cross-validation are preserved. Actual protocol/SAP, versions/timing, endpoint-specific models/missingness and hierarchy/multiplicity are not read here. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Separate materials for prespecified plans/changes |
Materials needed: Original protocol, SAP, revisions, estimands/denominators/analyses, all endpoints and publication timing. Unread documents are not declared absent. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 26 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N26 · Evidence conditionAre sponsorship/funding, products, authors and research involvement separated?Required |
MRC/NIHR EME, NIHR Oxford BRC/Fellowship/CLAHRC Oxford support and the University of Oxford sponsor are preserved. The declaration of no manufacturer product/analysis/writing/publication support is distinguished from SEL’s outside-trial Pleuristem consulting and KW’s Zimmer Biomet royalties. Detailed company cash funding, employee authors and individual roles are not newly certified. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Four company-involvement items and institution/foundation support |
Materials needed: Individual original materials on company cash funding, product support, employee authors/outside relationships, design/analysis/data control and other institutional support. Original I2 is not used as new certification of all items/independence. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 27 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N27 · Evidence conditionAre unmeasured outcomes, null endpoints and unverified details separated?Required |
The null 24-week work result, original CI exclusion of the power-assumption magnitude, absence of a clinical threshold, ATRS/long-term results and unread details are distinguished. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Question/results and access gaps |
Materials needed: Original direct-measurement/endpoint tables, estimands/denominators, plans and actual-access records. Unread is not substituted for unreported, or null for exactly zero effect/equivalence. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 28 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N28 · Evidence conditionAre reports, trials, people, tests/timepoints and sibling sheets separated?Required |
Parent 2970 and both existing subclaims share the same PATH-2 cohort/registrations, 2019 core report and 2022 long-term report. The two-year report is not a separate replication trial; the same people, limbs, tests, groups, timepoints, references and sibling sheets are not summed as new independent trials/participants. Linked-report counts do not certify unique-trial/participant totals. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Linked records versus unique trials/participants |
Materials needed: Original report/registration, cohort/test/timepoint, event/repetition/observation and overlap relationships. Unique-trial counts/participant totals remain not recorded. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 29 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N29 · Evidence conditionAre the original single trial and separate independent replication distinguished?Supplementary |
Parent R1/I2 and the single-trial scope are preserved. Timepoints/endpoints in the same participants, sibling sheets and long-term PRP reports are not certified as new independent replication. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Parent R1/I2, follow-up and confirmation |
Materials needed: Confirmatory materials with separate prespecified plans, direct population/intervention/comparator/endpoint/period, denominators/effects/CI and disclosed funding/author relationships for the selected question. No new search/independence judgment here. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 30 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N30 · Evidence conditionAre the subclaim grade and parent score/axes preserved?Required |
Selected grade/note and Korean/English question are preserved; absent subclaim score/status/axes remain not recorded. Parent D34, safety and axes are parent context, not transferred to a selected-subclaim score. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Selected D grade, absent subclaim values and parent D34 |
Materials needed: Materials for existing subclaim/parent-boundary review and actual corrections. No new grade/score or official RoB 2/GRADE certification. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 31 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N31 · Evidence conditionAre Korean/English manuscripts, original citations and absent fields preserved?Required |
Original citations/descriptions, evidence, citation lists, axes and selected subclaim records in both parent languages are preserved in the complete summary. Separate Korean/English classification information is absent; new fields are not filled in the original. No comparison with external English full texts. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Both original languages and absent separate classification information |
Materials needed: Materials needed for review of terminology, endpoints/effects/test units, selected scope and absent fields in both languages. Production explanations are distinguished from original records. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 32 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N32 · Evidence conditionAre source dates/corrections/history separated from production dates?Required |
Original 2026-08-26, empty corrections/deliberation and verdict-decision cross-validation are preserved. Original citation/registration descriptions differ from current production/condition freezing/application or completed content review. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Original 2026-08-26 and new conditions/application |
Materials needed: Materials for updates separating original texts, events, conditions/observations and verdict decisions when new evidence/corrections arise. Historical wording is not used as completed clinical content review in this work. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 33 |
Unverified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N33 · Evidence conditionWhat direct materials would fill the selected gaps?Supplementary |
Gaps in 24-week work testing, estimands/denominators, power assumptions/clinical thresholds, missingness and harms require corresponding original materials; ATRS/two-year reports or chronic tendinopathy are not substituted. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Direct endpoints, estimands/CI and denominators/follow-up |
Materials needed: Original tables/plans, direct population/comparator/endpoints, estimands/CI, observation/tests/denominators, actual exposure/adherence, separate confirmation and long-term harms. Only needs are recorded; no new search/research here. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |
| 34 |
Partly verified |
Full text not readStored summary read |
N34 · Evidence conditionAre applicability records distinguished from content review and treatment instructions?Supplementary |
These are applicability records based on the preserved summary. Existing content/question-boundary review remains incomplete; candidate review-pending/production-eligible markers are preserved as history. |
Production observation distinguishing selected/parent, report and endpoint materials in the preserved summary. Detailed original materials remain unverified and existing content review is incomplete; this does not establish completed clinical review or certification. |
Applicability records, existing candidate history and content review |
Materials needed: Existing content review and later actual-material/correction work. The historical production did not perform clinical original-material review, external access, new calculations, grade changes or PRP/blood-draw/injection/rehabilitation/exercise/tendon/treatment-replacement instructions. Only material requests/research needs are recorded; no search or research was performed in that production. |