{
  "schema_version": "chamgap-public-criteria-1.0",
  "title": "Stand-Alone Single-Leg Standing × Hip Fracture — Key Trial 1 Versus 1; Prevention Unproven · Evidence and Gaps Sheet",
  "language": "en",
  "translation_date": "2026-10-19",
  "criteria_version": "1.0",
  "criteria_date": "2026-10-06",
  "condition_origin": "Chamgap's own application conditions",
  "method_sources": [
    {
      "id": "M03",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-03",
      "section": "§3.1, §3.2.1–3.2.3, MECIR C5/C7/C13",
      "official_principle": "Clearly record the question, eligibility conditions and reasons for changes, and distinguish variations in interventions.",
      "review_level": "Existing methodological links were reused for production. External originals were not reread and methodological content was not reassessed."
    },
    {
      "id": "M04",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5.1 (2025), chapter updated 2025-03",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-04",
      "section": "§4.5, §4.6.1–4.6.3, MECIR C42",
      "official_principle": "Distinguish studies from reports and link them; do not omit a study solely because results are unreported.",
      "review_level": "Existing methodological links were reused for production. External originals were not reread and methodological content was not reassessed."
    },
    {
      "id": "M08",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-08",
      "section": "§8.1–8.2.3, Table 8.2.a",
      "official_principle": "Define the outcome and effect of interest, then examine randomization, deviations, missing data, measurement and selective reporting.",
      "review_level": "Existing methodological links were reused for production. External originals were not reread and methodological content was not reassessed."
    },
    {
      "id": "M15",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-15",
      "section": "§15.2.4, §15.3.1–15.3.3",
      "official_principle": "Distinguish effect estimates, intervals, importance and applicability. Sample size alone does not determine precision.",
      "review_level": "Existing methodological links were reused for production. External originals were not reread and methodological content was not reassessed."
    },
    {
      "id": "M19",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-19",
      "section": "§19.1.2, §19.2.1–19.2.4",
      "official_principle": "Harm questions may require different designs, populations and follow-up from efficacy questions. Case reports do not establish incidence rates.",
      "review_level": "Existing methodological links were reused for production. External originals were not reread and methodological content was not reassessed."
    }
  ],
  "status_dictionary": {
    "Partly verified": "Partial information from the stored summary is linked; detailed originals and content review remain incomplete.",
    "Unverified": "Required details cannot be established within the preserved scope. This does not establish absence of effects or studies, or safety.",
    "Review incomplete": "Review of existing content remains incomplete.",
    "Met": "This state is used only within the relevant conditions after material verification and content review. It was not automatically assigned in this work.",
    "Not reported": "Unreported within material actually read. Unread external material is not relabeled as unreported.",
    "Inaccessible": "This means actual access failure. External access was not attempted in this work, so this state was not assigned.",
    "Not applicable": "Used only with an application exception and reason based on the question scope.",
    "Conflicting data": "This requires actual comparison of materials; no new conflict judgment was made in this work.",
    "Insufficient evidence for the conditions": "This indicates gaps in additional material for the selected conditions. Unread material as a whole is not converted into an efficacy grade."
  },
  "requirements": [
    {
      "item_id": "N01",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "Which fracture question and original verdict are being transferred?",
      "needed": "Original hip-fracture prevention claim, grade and explanation",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This condition connects Original hip-fracture prevention claim, grade and explanation with populations, comparators, exposure, fracture definitions, events versus affected participants, denominators, timing, prespecification, precision, reports and errata or harms for the selected hip-fracture question.",
      "application_exception": "Retain original subclaim D and absent score, status and axes without inheriting parent C50 or axes. Equal fracture counts are not established as an exact absence of effect or equivalence; falls, female subgroups and BMD are not reassigned as hip-fracture effects. The erratum is not a new trial and correction details are unverified. No new effects, CIs, P values, denominators, independent totals, safety certification or exercise, prevention or treatment methods are created.",
      "criterion": "Corresponding original material and analysis scope for Original hip-fracture prevention claim, grade and explanation must be linked to fracture populations, comparators, sites, denominators, outcomes and timing, distinguishing stored summaries from unverified details and other results.",
      "basis": "Preserved application conditions concerning questions, comparisons, reports versus trials, outcomes, denominators, errata and harms were referenced.",
      "condition_origin": "These are in-house application conditions preserved for the existing subclaim. They do not establish clinical preregistration, official-tool certification or completed content review.",
      "proposed_research": "Material needed: Fracture definitions, arm-specific events, denominators, observation periods, direct effects and CIs are unverified. This transfers an existing question without creating a new independent claim or clinical certification. This records needed materials; no new research was executed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N02",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "What was the key hip-fracture result?",
      "needed": "Original fracture events and outcome-specific denominators, observation and estimates",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This condition connects Original fracture events and outcome-specific denominators, observation and estimates with populations, comparators, exposure, fracture definitions, events versus affected participants, denominators, timing, prespecification, precision, reports and errata or harms for the selected hip-fracture question.",
      "application_exception": "Retain original subclaim D and absent score, status and axes without inheriting parent C50 or axes. Equal fracture counts are not established as an exact absence of effect or equivalence; falls, female subgroups and BMD are not reassigned as hip-fracture effects. The erratum is not a new trial and correction details are unverified. No new effects, CIs, P values, denominators, independent totals, safety certification or exercise, prevention or treatment methods are created.",
      "criterion": "Corresponding original material and analysis scope for Original fracture events and outcome-specific denominators, observation and estimates must be linked to fracture populations, comparators, sites, denominators, outcomes and timing, distinguishing stored summaries from unverified details and other results.",
      "basis": "Preserved application conditions concerning questions, comparisons, reports versus trials, outcomes, denominators, errata and harms were referenced.",
      "condition_origin": "These are in-house application conditions preserved for the existing subclaim. They do not establish clinical preregistration, official-tool certification or completed content review.",
      "proposed_research": "Material needed: Fracture ascertainment, events versus affected participants, outcome-specific denominators by arm, observation windows, estimates, CIs and original analyses are needed. No new effects or CIs are calculated from event counts. This records needed materials; no new research was executed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N03",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "Do equal event counts establish an exact absence of effect?",
      "needed": "Sparse events, null findings, precision and clinical importance",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This condition connects Sparse events, null findings, precision and clinical importance with populations, comparators, exposure, fracture definitions, events versus affected participants, denominators, timing, prespecification, precision, reports and errata or harms for the selected hip-fracture question.",
      "application_exception": "Retain original subclaim D and absent score, status and axes without inheriting parent C50 or axes. Equal fracture counts are not established as an exact absence of effect or equivalence; falls, female subgroups and BMD are not reassigned as hip-fracture effects. The erratum is not a new trial and correction details are unverified. No new effects, CIs, P values, denominators, independent totals, safety certification or exercise, prevention or treatment methods are created.",
      "criterion": "Corresponding original material and analysis scope for Sparse events, null findings, precision and clinical importance must be linked to fracture populations, comparators, sites, denominators, outcomes and timing, distinguishing stored summaries from unverified details and other results.",
      "basis": "Preserved application conditions concerning questions, comparisons, reports versus trials, outcomes, denominators, errata and harms were referenced.",
      "condition_origin": "These are in-house application conditions preserved for the existing subclaim. They do not establish clinical preregistration, official-tool certification or completed content review.",
      "proposed_research": "Material needed: Arm-specific denominators, tests, direct effects, CIs, clinical-importance boundaries, prespecified sample planning and power are unverified. No new event risks, CIs or sample sizes are calculated. This records needed materials; no new research was executed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N04",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "Are allocation and analysis populations the fracture observation denominators?",
      "needed": "Recruitment, allocation, withdrawals, analysis and fracture-outcome denominators",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This condition connects Recruitment, allocation, withdrawals, analysis and fracture-outcome denominators with populations, comparators, exposure, fracture definitions, events versus affected participants, denominators, timing, prespecification, precision, reports and errata or harms for the selected hip-fracture question.",
      "application_exception": "Retain original subclaim D and absent score, status and axes without inheriting parent C50 or axes. Equal fracture counts are not established as an exact absence of effect or equivalence; falls, female subgroups and BMD are not reassigned as hip-fracture effects. The erratum is not a new trial and correction details are unverified. No new effects, CIs, P values, denominators, independent totals, safety certification or exercise, prevention or treatment methods are created.",
      "criterion": "Corresponding original material and analysis scope for Recruitment, allocation, withdrawals, analysis and fracture-outcome denominators must be linked to fracture populations, comparators, sites, denominators, outcomes and timing, distinguishing stored summaries from unverified details and other results.",
      "basis": "Preserved application conditions concerning questions, comparisons, reports versus trials, outcomes, denominators, errata and harms were referenced.",
      "condition_origin": "These are in-house application conditions preserved for the existing subclaim. They do not establish clinical preregistration, official-tool certification or completed content review.",
      "proposed_research": "Material needed: Original participant flows linking arm-specific allocation, completion, follow-up, fracture ascertainment, analysis populations, withdrawals and reasons for missingness are needed. Withdrawal counts are original statements, not new calculations. This records needed materials; no new research was executed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N05",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "Did recurrent-faller exclusion also apply to fracture analyses?",
      "needed": "Separate fall-event exclusions from fracture analyses",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This condition connects Separate fall-event exclusions from fracture analyses with populations, comparators, exposure, fracture definitions, events versus affected participants, denominators, timing, prespecification, precision, reports and errata or harms for the selected hip-fracture question.",
      "application_exception": "Retain original subclaim D and absent score, status and axes without inheriting parent C50 or axes. Equal fracture counts are not established as an exact absence of effect or equivalence; falls, female subgroups and BMD are not reassigned as hip-fracture effects. The erratum is not a new trial and correction details are unverified. No new effects, CIs, P values, denominators, independent totals, safety certification or exercise, prevention or treatment methods are created.",
      "criterion": "Corresponding original material and analysis scope for Separate fall-event exclusions from fracture analyses must be linked to fracture populations, comparators, sites, denominators, outcomes and timing, distinguishing stored summaries from unverified details and other results.",
      "basis": "Preserved application conditions concerning questions, comparisons, reports versus trials, outcomes, denominators, errata and harms were referenced.",
      "condition_origin": "These are in-house application conditions preserved for the existing subclaim. They do not establish clinical preregistration, official-tool certification or completed content review.",
      "proposed_research": "Material needed: Exclusion reasons, prespecification, outcome-specific denominators and fractures before and after exclusion, sensitivity analyses and original ITT tables are needed. The same exclusion is not assumed, and pre-exclusion results are not reconstructed by calculation. This records needed materials; no new research was executed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N06",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "Is a fall-event signal an effect on fracture prevention?",
      "needed": "Separate cumulative fall events, faller risk and fractures",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This condition connects Separate cumulative fall events, faller risk and fractures with populations, comparators, exposure, fracture definitions, events versus affected participants, denominators, timing, prespecification, precision, reports and errata or harms for the selected hip-fracture question.",
      "application_exception": "Retain original subclaim D and absent score, status and axes without inheriting parent C50 or axes. Equal fracture counts are not established as an exact absence of effect or equivalence; falls, female subgroups and BMD are not reassigned as hip-fracture effects. The erratum is not a new trial and correction details are unverified. No new effects, CIs, P values, denominators, independent totals, safety certification or exercise, prevention or treatment methods are created.",
      "criterion": "Corresponding original material and analysis scope for Separate cumulative fall events, faller risk and fractures must be linked to fracture populations, comparators, sites, denominators, outcomes and timing, distinguishing stored summaries from unverified details and other results.",
      "basis": "Preserved application conditions concerning questions, comparisons, reports versus trials, outcomes, denominators, errata and harms were referenced.",
      "condition_origin": "These are in-house application conditions preserved for the existing subclaim. They do not establish clinical preregistration, official-tool certification or completed content review.",
      "proposed_research": "Material needed: Outcome-specific definitions, fall events versus people, fracture ascertainment, denominators, observation exposure and original effects, CIs and P values are needed. No new event risks or incidence rates are calculated. This records needed materials; no new research was executed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N07",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "What is the scope of null fractures in the later trial?",
      "needed": "Fracture sites, denominators and duration in the later older balance-impaired population",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This condition connects Fracture sites, denominators and duration in the later older balance-impaired population with populations, comparators, exposure, fracture definitions, events versus affected participants, denominators, timing, prespecification, precision, reports and errata or harms for the selected hip-fracture question.",
      "application_exception": "Retain original subclaim D and absent score, status and axes without inheriting parent C50 or axes. Equal fracture counts are not established as an exact absence of effect or equivalence; falls, female subgroups and BMD are not reassigned as hip-fracture effects. The erratum is not a new trial and correction details are unverified. No new effects, CIs, P values, denominators, independent totals, safety certification or exercise, prevention or treatment methods are created.",
      "criterion": "Corresponding original material and analysis scope for Fracture sites, denominators and duration in the later older balance-impaired population must be linked to fracture populations, comparators, sites, denominators, outcomes and timing, distinguishing stored summaries from unverified details and other results.",
      "basis": "Preserved application conditions concerning questions, comparisons, reports versus trials, outcomes, denominators, errata and harms were referenced.",
      "condition_origin": "These are in-house application conditions preserved for the existing subclaim. They do not establish clinical preregistration, official-tool certification or completed content review.",
      "proposed_research": "Material needed: Original later-trial methods, fracture sites and ascertainment, arm-specific events, denominators, timing, effects, CIs and materials before and after the erratum are needed. Fractures with unverified sites are not filled in as hip-fracture events. This records needed materials; no new research was executed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N08",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "Is the female-faller subgroup signal a reduction in fractures?",
      "needed": "Sex subgroups, fallers and fracture effects of interest",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This condition connects Sex subgroups, fallers and fracture effects of interest with populations, comparators, exposure, fracture definitions, events versus affected participants, denominators, timing, prespecification, precision, reports and errata or harms for the selected hip-fracture question.",
      "application_exception": "Retain original subclaim D and absent score, status and axes without inheriting parent C50 or axes. Equal fracture counts are not established as an exact absence of effect or equivalence; falls, female subgroups and BMD are not reassigned as hip-fracture effects. The erratum is not a new trial and correction details are unverified. No new effects, CIs, P values, denominators, independent totals, safety certification or exercise, prevention or treatment methods are created.",
      "criterion": "Corresponding original material and analysis scope for Sex subgroups, fallers and fracture effects of interest must be linked to fracture populations, comparators, sites, denominators, outcomes and timing, distinguishing stored summaries from unverified details and other results.",
      "basis": "Preserved application conditions concerning questions, comparisons, reports versus trials, outcomes, denominators, errata and harms were referenced.",
      "condition_origin": "These are in-house application conditions preserved for the existing subclaim. They do not establish clinical preregistration, official-tool certification or completed content review.",
      "proposed_research": "Material needed: Prespecification, sex-subgroup denominators, original faller and fracture values, interactions, multiplicity, effects and CIs are needed. No sex-specific participant totals or new effects are created. This records needed materials; no new research was executed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N09",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "Can a later trial by the same investigators count as independent confirmation?",
      "needed": "Investigator groups, recruitment, report overlap and independence",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This condition connects Investigator groups, recruitment, report overlap and independence with populations, comparators, exposure, fracture definitions, events versus affected participants, denominators, timing, prespecification, precision, reports and errata or harms for the selected hip-fracture question.",
      "application_exception": "Retain original subclaim D and absent score, status and axes without inheriting parent C50 or axes. Equal fracture counts are not established as an exact absence of effect or equivalence; falls, female subgroups and BMD are not reassigned as hip-fracture effects. The erratum is not a new trial and correction details are unverified. No new effects, CIs, P values, denominators, independent totals, safety certification or exercise, prevention or treatment methods are created.",
      "criterion": "Corresponding original material and analysis scope for Investigator groups, recruitment, report overlap and independence must be linked to fracture populations, comparators, sites, denominators, outcomes and timing, distinguishing stored summaries from unverified details and other results.",
      "basis": "Preserved application conditions concerning questions, comparisons, reports versus trials, outcomes, denominators, errata and harms were referenced.",
      "condition_origin": "These are in-house application conditions preserved for the existing subclaim. They do not establish clinical preregistration, official-tool certification or completed content review.",
      "proposed_research": "Material needed: Institutions, recruitment periods, registration, support, participant and report overlap, and original results for the same fracture question are needed. Unique trial and participant totals remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N10",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "What did the erratum change?",
      "needed": "Erratum existence, target report and correction details",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This condition connects Erratum existence, target report and correction details with populations, comparators, exposure, fracture definitions, events versus affected participants, denominators, timing, prespecification, precision, reports and errata or harms for the selected hip-fracture question.",
      "application_exception": "Retain original subclaim D and absent score, status and axes without inheriting parent C50 or axes. Equal fracture counts are not established as an exact absence of effect or equivalence; falls, female subgroups and BMD are not reassigned as hip-fracture effects. The erratum is not a new trial and correction details are unverified. No new effects, CIs, P values, denominators, independent totals, safety certification or exercise, prevention or treatment methods are created.",
      "criterion": "Corresponding original material and analysis scope for Erratum existence, target report and correction details must be linked to fracture populations, comparators, sites, denominators, outcomes and timing, distinguishing stored summaries from unverified details and other results.",
      "basis": "Preserved application conditions concerning questions, comparisons, reports versus trials, outcomes, denominators, errata and harms were referenced.",
      "condition_origin": "These are in-house application conditions preserved for the existing subclaim. They do not establish clinical preregistration, official-tool certification or completed content review.",
      "proposed_research": "Material needed: The complete erratum, original and corrected tables, affected outcomes, denominators and reasons for changes are needed. The external erratum was not read and the original verdict was not modified in this work. This records needed materials; no new research was executed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N11",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "Are the key high-risk population and later balance-impaired population the same?",
      "needed": "Trial-specific eligibility, baseline fracture risk and outcome denominators",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This condition connects Trial-specific eligibility, baseline fracture risk and outcome denominators with populations, comparators, exposure, fracture definitions, events versus affected participants, denominators, timing, prespecification, precision, reports and errata or harms for the selected hip-fracture question.",
      "application_exception": "Retain original subclaim D and absent score, status and axes without inheriting parent C50 or axes. Equal fracture counts are not established as an exact absence of effect or equivalence; falls, female subgroups and BMD are not reassigned as hip-fracture effects. The erratum is not a new trial and correction details are unverified. No new effects, CIs, P values, denominators, independent totals, safety certification or exercise, prevention or treatment methods are created.",
      "criterion": "Corresponding original material and analysis scope for Trial-specific eligibility, baseline fracture risk and outcome denominators must be linked to fracture populations, comparators, sites, denominators, outcomes and timing, distinguishing stored summaries from unverified details and other results.",
      "basis": "Preserved application conditions concerning questions, comparisons, reports versus trials, outcomes, denominators, errata and harms were referenced.",
      "condition_origin": "These are in-house application conditions preserved for the existing subclaim. They do not establish clinical preregistration, official-tool certification or completed content review.",
      "proposed_research": "Material needed: Trial-specific high-risk definitions, baseline falls and fractures, medications, bone disorders, comorbidities, institutions, recruitment, exclusions and outcome denominators are unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N12",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "Were comparators, support and concurrent treatment distinguished?",
      "needed": "Original controls, common care, actual participation and exposure",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This condition connects Original controls, common care, actual participation and exposure with populations, comparators, exposure, fracture definitions, events versus affected participants, denominators, timing, prespecification, precision, reports and errata or harms for the selected hip-fracture question.",
      "application_exception": "Retain original subclaim D and absent score, status and axes without inheriting parent C50 or axes. Equal fracture counts are not established as an exact absence of effect or equivalence; falls, female subgroups and BMD are not reassigned as hip-fracture effects. The erratum is not a new trial and correction details are unverified. No new effects, CIs, P values, denominators, independent totals, safety certification or exercise, prevention or treatment methods are created.",
      "criterion": "Corresponding original material and analysis scope for Original controls, common care, actual participation and exposure must be linked to fracture populations, comparators, sites, denominators, outcomes and timing, distinguishing stored summaries from unverified details and other results.",
      "basis": "Preserved application conditions concerning questions, comparisons, reports versus trials, outcomes, denominators, errata and harms were referenced.",
      "condition_origin": "These are in-house application conditions preserved for the existing subclaim. They do not establish clinical preregistration, official-tool certification or completed content review.",
      "proposed_research": "Material needed: Materials linking arm-specific controls, common care, support, supervision, actual participation, concurrent treatment, original results and denominators are needed. No new exercise-performance or prevention methods are provided. This records needed materials; no new research was executed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N13",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "Can observation be extended to long-term prevention or other fracture sites?",
      "needed": "Key observation period, other fracture sites and post-discontinuation persistence",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This condition connects Key observation period, other fracture sites and post-discontinuation persistence with populations, comparators, exposure, fracture definitions, events versus affected participants, denominators, timing, prespecification, precision, reports and errata or harms for the selected hip-fracture question.",
      "application_exception": "Retain original subclaim D and absent score, status and axes without inheriting parent C50 or axes. Equal fracture counts are not established as an exact absence of effect or equivalence; falls, female subgroups and BMD are not reassigned as hip-fracture effects. The erratum is not a new trial and correction details are unverified. No new effects, CIs, P values, denominators, independent totals, safety certification or exercise, prevention or treatment methods are created.",
      "criterion": "Corresponding original material and analysis scope for Key observation period, other fracture sites and post-discontinuation persistence must be linked to fracture populations, comparators, sites, denominators, outcomes and timing, distinguishing stored summaries from unverified details and other results.",
      "basis": "Preserved application conditions concerning questions, comparisons, reports versus trials, outcomes, denominators, errata and harms were referenced.",
      "condition_origin": "These are in-house application conditions preserved for the existing subclaim. They do not establish clinical preregistration, official-tool certification or completed content review.",
      "proposed_research": "Material needed: Fractures by site and period, observation exposure, follow-up, maintenance exercise, arm-specific denominators, direct effects and CIs are needed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N14",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "Are overall BMD findings a substitute for fracture events?",
      "needed": "Separate postmenopausal BMD trial and fracture outcomes",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This condition connects Separate postmenopausal BMD trial and fracture outcomes with populations, comparators, exposure, fracture definitions, events versus affected participants, denominators, timing, prespecification, precision, reports and errata or harms for the selected hip-fracture question.",
      "application_exception": "Retain original subclaim D and absent score, status and axes without inheriting parent C50 or axes. Equal fracture counts are not established as an exact absence of effect or equivalence; falls, female subgroups and BMD are not reassigned as hip-fracture effects. The erratum is not a new trial and correction details are unverified. No new effects, CIs, P values, denominators, independent totals, safety certification or exercise, prevention or treatment methods are created.",
      "criterion": "Corresponding original material and analysis scope for Separate postmenopausal BMD trial and fracture outcomes must be linked to fracture populations, comparators, sites, denominators, outcomes and timing, distinguishing stored summaries from unverified details and other results.",
      "basis": "Preserved application conditions concerning questions, comparisons, reports versus trials, outcomes, denominators, errata and harms were referenced.",
      "condition_origin": "These are in-house application conditions preserved for the existing subclaim. They do not establish clinical preregistration, official-tool certification or completed content review.",
      "proposed_research": "Material needed: Separate original populations, denominators, BMD, sites, subgroup analyses and materials directly assessing fractures are needed. BMD findings are not converted into hip-fracture prevention. This records needed materials; no new research was executed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N15",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "Can other balance exercises provide fracture evidence for stand-alone single-leg standing?",
      "needed": "Boundaries between a stand-alone intervention and broader balance-and-strength programs",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This condition connects Boundaries between a stand-alone intervention and broader balance-and-strength programs with populations, comparators, exposure, fracture definitions, events versus affected participants, denominators, timing, prespecification, precision, reports and errata or harms for the selected hip-fracture question.",
      "application_exception": "Retain original subclaim D and absent score, status and axes without inheriting parent C50 or axes. Equal fracture counts are not established as an exact absence of effect or equivalence; falls, female subgroups and BMD are not reassigned as hip-fracture effects. The erratum is not a new trial and correction details are unverified. No new effects, CIs, P values, denominators, independent totals, safety certification or exercise, prevention or treatment methods are created.",
      "criterion": "Corresponding original material and analysis scope for Boundaries between a stand-alone intervention and broader balance-and-strength programs must be linked to fracture populations, comparators, sites, denominators, outcomes and timing, distinguishing stored summaries from unverified details and other results.",
      "basis": "Preserved application conditions concerning questions, comparisons, reports versus trials, outcomes, denominators, errata and harms were referenced.",
      "condition_origin": "These are in-house application conditions preserved for the existing subclaim. They do not establish clinical preregistration, official-tool certification or completed content review.",
      "proposed_research": "Material needed: Direct materials concerning the same stand-alone intervention, population, comparator, prespecified fracture outcome and period are needed. No new exercise or treatment guidance is created. This records needed materials; no new research was executed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N16",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "Are fracture ascertainment, blinding and selective reporting verified?",
      "needed": "Event collection, assessors, prespecified outcomes and missingness",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This condition connects Event collection, assessors, prespecified outcomes and missingness with populations, comparators, exposure, fracture definitions, events versus affected participants, denominators, timing, prespecification, precision, reports and errata or harms for the selected hip-fracture question.",
      "application_exception": "Retain original subclaim D and absent score, status and axes without inheriting parent C50 or axes. Equal fracture counts are not established as an exact absence of effect or equivalence; falls, female subgroups and BMD are not reassigned as hip-fracture effects. The erratum is not a new trial and correction details are unverified. No new effects, CIs, P values, denominators, independent totals, safety certification or exercise, prevention or treatment methods are created.",
      "criterion": "Corresponding original material and analysis scope for Event collection, assessors, prespecified outcomes and missingness must be linked to fracture populations, comparators, sites, denominators, outcomes and timing, distinguishing stored summaries from unverified details and other results.",
      "basis": "Preserved application conditions concerning questions, comparisons, reports versus trials, outcomes, denominators, errata and harms were referenced.",
      "condition_origin": "These are in-house application conditions preserved for the existing subclaim. They do not establish clinical preregistration, official-tool certification or completed content review.",
      "proposed_research": "Material needed: Original prespecification, allocation, concealment, fracture diagnosis, independent adjudication, event collection, missingness and outcome or analysis changes are needed. No new official bias-tool assessment or verdict is performed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N17",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "Are original research conditions being converted into exercise or prevention methods?",
      "needed": "Boundary between evidence records and practice instructions",
      "role": "Supplementary",
      "role_reason": "This condition connects Boundary between evidence records and practice instructions with populations, comparators, exposure, fracture definitions, events versus affected participants, denominators, timing, prespecification, precision, reports and errata or harms for the selected hip-fracture question.",
      "application_exception": "Retain original subclaim D and absent score, status and axes without inheriting parent C50 or axes. Equal fracture counts are not established as an exact absence of effect or equivalence; falls, female subgroups and BMD are not reassigned as hip-fracture effects. The erratum is not a new trial and correction details are unverified. No new effects, CIs, P values, denominators, independent totals, safety certification or exercise, prevention or treatment methods are created.",
      "criterion": "Corresponding original material and analysis scope for Boundary between evidence records and practice instructions must be linked to fracture populations, comparators, sites, denominators, outcomes and timing, distinguishing stored summaries from unverified details and other results.",
      "basis": "Preserved application conditions concerning questions, comparisons, reports versus trials, outcomes, denominators, errata and harms were referenced.",
      "condition_origin": "These are in-house application conditions preserved for the existing subclaim. They do not establish clinical preregistration, official-tool certification or completed content review.",
      "proposed_research": "Material needed: Actual exercise and treatment decisions are a separate scope. Material verifying original methods, populations, comparators, exposure and adherence is needed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N18",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "Were funding, products, authors and design or analysis roles distinguished?",
      "needed": "Report-specific funding, material support, affiliations and research roles",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This condition connects Report-specific funding, material support, affiliations and research roles with populations, comparators, exposure, fracture definitions, events versus affected participants, denominators, timing, prespecification, precision, reports and errata or harms for the selected hip-fracture question.",
      "application_exception": "Retain original subclaim D and absent score, status and axes without inheriting parent C50 or axes. Equal fracture counts are not established as an exact absence of effect or equivalence; falls, female subgroups and BMD are not reassigned as hip-fracture effects. The erratum is not a new trial and correction details are unverified. No new effects, CIs, P values, denominators, independent totals, safety certification or exercise, prevention or treatment methods are created.",
      "criterion": "Corresponding original material and analysis scope for Report-specific funding, material support, affiliations and research roles must be linked to fracture populations, comparators, sites, denominators, outcomes and timing, distinguishing stored summaries from unverified details and other results.",
      "basis": "Preserved application conditions concerning questions, comparisons, reports versus trials, outcomes, denominators, errata and harms were referenced.",
      "condition_origin": "These are in-house application conditions preserved for the existing subclaim. They do not establish clinical preregistration, official-tool certification or completed content review.",
      "proposed_research": "Material needed: Documents separately identifying financial, product and equipment support, company and author affiliations, design, analysis and publication roles, and support sources are needed. This records needed materials; no new research was executed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N19",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "Can reports, errata and participants be added as independent trials?",
      "needed": "Relationships between papers, errata, trials and participants",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This condition connects Relationships between papers, errata, trials and participants with populations, comparators, exposure, fracture definitions, events versus affected participants, denominators, timing, prespecification, precision, reports and errata or harms for the selected hip-fracture question.",
      "application_exception": "Retain original subclaim D and absent score, status and axes without inheriting parent C50 or axes. Equal fracture counts are not established as an exact absence of effect or equivalence; falls, female subgroups and BMD are not reassigned as hip-fracture effects. The erratum is not a new trial and correction details are unverified. No new effects, CIs, P values, denominators, independent totals, safety certification or exercise, prevention or treatment methods are created.",
      "criterion": "Corresponding original material and analysis scope for Relationships between papers, errata, trials and participants must be linked to fracture populations, comparators, sites, denominators, outcomes and timing, distinguishing stored summaries from unverified details and other results.",
      "basis": "Preserved application conditions concerning questions, comparisons, reports versus trials, outcomes, denominators, errata and harms were referenced.",
      "condition_origin": "These are in-house application conditions preserved for the existing subclaim. They do not establish clinical preregistration, official-tool certification or completed content review.",
      "proposed_research": "Material needed: Links between reports, trials, erratum versions, registration, institutions, recruitment and participants are needed. Unique trial and participant totals remain unverified. This records needed materials; no new research was executed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N20",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "Were registration and prespecified plans actually read?",
      "needed": "Verification scope for original registration, protocols, SAPs, changes and denominators",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This condition connects Verification scope for original registration, protocols, SAPs, changes and denominators with populations, comparators, exposure, fracture definitions, events versus affected participants, denominators, timing, prespecification, precision, reports and errata or harms for the selected hip-fracture question.",
      "application_exception": "Retain original subclaim D and absent score, status and axes without inheriting parent C50 or axes. Equal fracture counts are not established as an exact absence of effect or equivalence; falls, female subgroups and BMD are not reassigned as hip-fracture effects. The erratum is not a new trial and correction details are unverified. No new effects, CIs, P values, denominators, independent totals, safety certification or exercise, prevention or treatment methods are created.",
      "criterion": "Corresponding original material and analysis scope for Verification scope for original registration, protocols, SAPs, changes and denominators must be linked to fracture populations, comparators, sites, denominators, outcomes and timing, distinguishing stored summaries from unverified details and other results.",
      "basis": "Preserved application conditions concerning questions, comparisons, reports versus trials, outcomes, denominators, errata and harms were referenced.",
      "condition_origin": "These are in-house application conditions preserved for the existing subclaim. They do not establish clinical preregistration, official-tool certification or completed content review.",
      "proposed_research": "Material needed: Original registration, protocols, SAPs, changes, exclusions, subgroups, outcomes, denominators and analysis plans are needed. No external lookup or external-link testing was performed in this work. This records needed materials; no new research was executed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N21",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "What is known about exercise-related harms, vulnerable populations and exposure denominators?",
      "needed": "Falls or injuries during exercise, support, supervision and harm collection",
      "role": "Supplementary",
      "role_reason": "This condition connects Falls or injuries during exercise, support, supervision and harm collection with populations, comparators, exposure, fracture definitions, events versus affected participants, denominators, timing, prespecification, precision, reports and errata or harms for the selected hip-fracture question.",
      "application_exception": "Retain original subclaim D and absent score, status and axes without inheriting parent C50 or axes. Equal fracture counts are not established as an exact absence of effect or equivalence; falls, female subgroups and BMD are not reassigned as hip-fracture effects. The erratum is not a new trial and correction details are unverified. No new effects, CIs, P values, denominators, independent totals, safety certification or exercise, prevention or treatment methods are created.",
      "criterion": "Corresponding original material and analysis scope for Falls or injuries during exercise, support, supervision and harm collection must be linked to fracture populations, comparators, sites, denominators, outcomes and timing, distinguishing stored summaries from unverified details and other results.",
      "basis": "Preserved application conditions concerning questions, comparisons, reports versus trials, outcomes, denominators, errata and harms were referenced.",
      "condition_origin": "These are in-house application conditions preserved for the existing subclaim. They do not establish clinical preregistration, official-tool certification or completed content review.",
      "proposed_research": "Material needed: Active harm collection, timing, severity, falls and injuries, discontinuation, concurrent treatment, arm-specific denominators and exposure, support, supervision, vulnerable populations and long-term material are needed. No new exercise or treatment recommendations are created. This records needed materials; no new research was executed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N22",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "How do subclaim D and the parent score and axes differ?",
      "needed": "Subclaim grade and absent separate score, status and axes",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This condition connects Subclaim grade and absent separate score, status and axes with populations, comparators, exposure, fracture definitions, events versus affected participants, denominators, timing, prespecification, precision, reports and errata or harms for the selected hip-fracture question.",
      "application_exception": "Retain original subclaim D and absent score, status and axes without inheriting parent C50 or axes. Equal fracture counts are not established as an exact absence of effect or equivalence; falls, female subgroups and BMD are not reassigned as hip-fracture effects. The erratum is not a new trial and correction details are unverified. No new effects, CIs, P values, denominators, independent totals, safety certification or exercise, prevention or treatment methods are created.",
      "criterion": "Corresponding original material and analysis scope for Subclaim grade and absent separate score, status and axes must be linked to fracture populations, comparators, sites, denominators, outcomes and timing, distinguishing stored summaries from unverified details and other results.",
      "basis": "Preserved application conditions concerning questions, comparisons, reports versus trials, outcomes, denominators, errata and harms were referenced.",
      "condition_origin": "These are in-house application conditions preserved for the existing subclaim. They do not establish clinical preregistration, official-tool certification or completed content review.",
      "proposed_research": "Material needed: Parent and subclaim application boundaries are distinguished. Empty fields are not replaced with defaults, and no new grades, scores or independence certification are created. This records needed materials; no new research was executed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N23",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "How does reading a stored summary differ from reading external originals or an erratum?",
      "needed": "Reading scope for JSON, abstracts, full texts, registration, plans and errata",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This condition connects Reading scope for JSON, abstracts, full texts, registration, plans and errata with populations, comparators, exposure, fracture definitions, events versus affected participants, denominators, timing, prespecification, precision, reports and errata or harms for the selected hip-fracture question.",
      "application_exception": "Retain original subclaim D and absent score, status and axes without inheriting parent C50 or axes. Equal fracture counts are not established as an exact absence of effect or equivalence; falls, female subgroups and BMD are not reassigned as hip-fracture effects. The erratum is not a new trial and correction details are unverified. No new effects, CIs, P values, denominators, independent totals, safety certification or exercise, prevention or treatment methods are created.",
      "criterion": "Corresponding original material and analysis scope for Reading scope for JSON, abstracts, full texts, registration, plans and errata must be linked to fracture populations, comparators, sites, denominators, outcomes and timing, distinguishing stored summaries from unverified details and other results.",
      "basis": "Preserved application conditions concerning questions, comparisons, reports versus trials, outcomes, denominators, errata and harms were referenced.",
      "condition_origin": "These are in-house application conditions preserved for the existing subclaim. They do not establish clinical preregistration, official-tool certification or completed content review.",
      "proposed_research": "Material needed: Actual external-material acquisition, reading and content review require separate records. A URL is not labeled as current reading, successful access or completed content review. This records needed materials; no new research was executed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N24",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "Can representative populations and periods be copied to other reports' results?",
      "needed": "Bilingual originals, representative classifications and report-specific populations, denominators and timing",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This condition connects Bilingual originals, representative classifications and report-specific populations, denominators and timing with populations, comparators, exposure, fracture definitions, events versus affected participants, denominators, timing, prespecification, precision, reports and errata or harms for the selected hip-fracture question.",
      "application_exception": "Retain original subclaim D and absent score, status and axes without inheriting parent C50 or axes. Equal fracture counts are not established as an exact absence of effect or equivalence; falls, female subgroups and BMD are not reassigned as hip-fracture effects. The erratum is not a new trial and correction details are unverified. No new effects, CIs, P values, denominators, independent totals, safety certification or exercise, prevention or treatment methods are created.",
      "criterion": "Corresponding original material and analysis scope for Bilingual originals, representative classifications and report-specific populations, denominators and timing must be linked to fracture populations, comparators, sites, denominators, outcomes and timing, distinguishing stored summaries from unverified details and other results.",
      "basis": "Preserved application conditions concerning questions, comparisons, reports versus trials, outcomes, denominators, errata and harms were referenced.",
      "condition_origin": "These are in-house application conditions preserved for the existing subclaim. They do not establish clinical preregistration, official-tool certification or completed content review.",
      "proposed_research": "Material needed: Materials comparing each original report's populations, interventions, comparators, denominators, outcomes, timing and English wording are needed. External English-text comparison and erratum content review were not performed in this work. This records needed materials; no new research was executed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N25",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "Do the original evidence date, empty correction history and production date differ?",
      "needed": "Preserve evidence date, corrections, deliberation and original URLs",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This condition connects Preserve evidence date, corrections, deliberation and original URLs with populations, comparators, exposure, fracture definitions, events versus affected participants, denominators, timing, prespecification, precision, reports and errata or harms for the selected hip-fracture question.",
      "application_exception": "Retain original subclaim D and absent score, status and axes without inheriting parent C50 or axes. Equal fracture counts are not established as an exact absence of effect or equivalence; falls, female subgroups and BMD are not reassigned as hip-fracture effects. The erratum is not a new trial and correction details are unverified. No new effects, CIs, P values, denominators, independent totals, safety certification or exercise, prevention or treatment methods are created.",
      "criterion": "Corresponding original material and analysis scope for Preserve evidence date, corrections, deliberation and original URLs must be linked to fracture populations, comparators, sites, denominators, outcomes and timing, distinguishing stored summaries from unverified details and other results.",
      "basis": "Preserved application conditions concerning questions, comparisons, reports versus trials, outcomes, denominators, errata and harms were referenced.",
      "condition_origin": "These are in-house application conditions preserved for the existing subclaim. They do not establish clinical preregistration, official-tool certification or completed content review.",
      "proposed_research": "Material needed: After preserving complete originals, added materials, condition revisions, observation application and verdict changes must be linked as separate events, versions and reasons. This records needed materials; no new research was executed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N26",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "Are material-slot counts external acquisition or quality scores?",
      "needed": "Report links, local and external slots and unique clinical units",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This condition connects Report links, local and external slots and unique clinical units with populations, comparators, exposure, fracture definitions, events versus affected participants, denominators, timing, prespecification, precision, reports and errata or harms for the selected hip-fracture question.",
      "application_exception": "Retain original subclaim D and absent score, status and axes without inheriting parent C50 or axes. Equal fracture counts are not established as an exact absence of effect or equivalence; falls, female subgroups and BMD are not reassigned as hip-fracture effects. The erratum is not a new trial and correction details are unverified. No new effects, CIs, P values, denominators, independent totals, safety certification or exercise, prevention or treatment methods are created.",
      "criterion": "Corresponding original material and analysis scope for Report links, local and external slots and unique clinical units must be linked to fracture populations, comparators, sites, denominators, outcomes and timing, distinguishing stored summaries from unverified details and other results.",
      "basis": "Preserved application conditions concerning questions, comparisons, reports versus trials, outcomes, denominators, errata and harms were referenced.",
      "condition_origin": "These are in-house application conditions preserved for the existing subclaim. They do not establish clinical preregistration, official-tool certification or completed content review.",
      "proposed_research": "Material needed: Actual original-material acquisition and reading and links between trials, reports and cohorts are needed. Unread external materials, incomplete content review and unverified empty fields are retained. This records needed materials; no new research was executed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N27",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "How are new materials or changes to the question updated?",
      "needed": "Separate condition revision, evidence updates and original-verdict changes",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This condition connects Separate condition revision, evidence updates and original-verdict changes with populations, comparators, exposure, fracture definitions, events versus affected participants, denominators, timing, prespecification, precision, reports and errata or harms for the selected hip-fracture question.",
      "application_exception": "Retain original subclaim D and absent score, status and axes without inheriting parent C50 or axes. Equal fracture counts are not established as an exact absence of effect or equivalence; falls, female subgroups and BMD are not reassigned as hip-fracture effects. The erratum is not a new trial and correction details are unverified. No new effects, CIs, P values, denominators, independent totals, safety certification or exercise, prevention or treatment methods are created.",
      "criterion": "Corresponding original material and analysis scope for Separate condition revision, evidence updates and original-verdict changes must be linked to fracture populations, comparators, sites, denominators, outcomes and timing, distinguishing stored summaries from unverified details and other results.",
      "basis": "Preserved application conditions concerning questions, comparisons, reports versus trials, outcomes, denominators, errata and harms were referenced.",
      "condition_origin": "These are in-house application conditions preserved for the existing subclaim. They do not establish clinical preregistration, official-tool certification or completed content review.",
      "proposed_research": "Material needed: Complete originals, events, versions and reasons for changes must be recorded. No new clinical calculations, effects, CIs, independence certification or exercise, prevention or treatment guidance are created. This records needed materials; no new research was executed."
    }
  ]
}