{ "schema_version": "chamgap-public-evidence-check-1.0", "public_id": "v2956-s0", "verdict_number": "2956", "title": "Olistic Women finished product · Six-month TrichoScan hair density — Evidence Check", "view_version": "1.0", "view_created_date": "2026-10-12", "criteria_version": "1.0", "criteria_date": "2026-10-06", "review_date": null, "legacy_evidence_date": "2026-08-26", "review_scope": { "materials_read": "Existing review summaries and stored records of methodological application", "clinical_papers_directly_read": false, "new_clinical_search": false, "limitation": "The whole stored parent-verdict summary and selected subclaim were read for production. External papers, abstracts, full texts, registry, protocol, SAP and funding disclosures were not separately read or accessed. Historical review records are not inherited as current clinical verification or a new verdict.", "date_meaning": "This is the date the stored materials were checked, not the date of a new search of the clinical literature." }, "claim_context": { "population": "106 premenopausal women diagnosed with telogen effluvium allocated (53/53); analyzed, measured and completed denominators by timepoint are unverified", "intervention": "Olistic Women finished drinkable multi-ingredient nutraceutical", "dose": "Original study exposure: one 25-mL vial/day for six months; not intake guidance or product recommendations", "comparator": "Trial placebo; detailed composition and blinding specifications unread", "endpoint": "Change from baseline to day 180 in TrichoScan hair density, hairs/cm²; distinct from appearance, perception and hair-cycle ratios", "duration": "Six months/180 days; the day-90 repeat timepoint is a separate result, and persistence after completion is unverified", "excluded_extensions": [ "No new research, effects, CIs, calculations, assessments, independent certification, participant totals or product/drug-use/dosing/treatment or adjunct-treatment reduction/discontinuation guidance is created" ] }, "requirements": [ { "item_id": "N01", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpoint", "question": "What are the selected finished-product question and original subclaim assessment?", "needed": "Original six-month TrichoScan hair-density text, grade and note", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition exposing direct original material, formulation, comparison, denominators and gaps for the selected endpoint", "application_exception": "Do not fill unverified selected material with other endpoints, formulations, trials or person/eye/measurement units", "criterion": "Original six-month TrichoScan hair-density text, grade and note; preserve original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, assessments, calculations or independent certification", "basis": "Retain the production copy of existing methodology application records and methodology linkage; full definition review and official certification are incomplete", "condition_origin": "New production condition; existing-content review and automatic verification-process passage are incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish the original assessment from production and review of existing content", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original text, bibliography and context are in the preserved review summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The selected row concerns increased six-month TrichoScan hair density with this finished product, original grade C and a note of day-180 +27.31 versus +18.23 hairs/cm². The parent is C with 50 points.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment", "missingness": "The selected row has no score, status or axes. Do not fill subclaim scores/axes from parent values or create a new assessment.", "uncertainty": "External abstract, full text, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculation, content review or clinical checks", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Selected row and original parent assessment" }, { "item_id": "N02", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpoint", "question": "What are the actual population and scope of telogen-effluvium diagnosis?", "needed": "Premenopausal women, diagnosis, eligibility, baseline and exclusions", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition exposing direct original material, formulation, comparison, denominators and gaps for the selected endpoint", "application_exception": "Do not fill unverified selected material with other endpoints, formulations, trials or person/eye/measurement units", "criterion": "Premenopausal women, diagnosis, eligibility, baseline and exclusions; preserve original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, assessments, calculations or independent certification", "basis": "Retain the production copy of existing methodology application records and methodology linkage; full definition review and official certification are incomplete", "condition_origin": "New production condition; existing-content review and automatic verification-process passage are incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish the recruited population from other hair-loss conditions and populations", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original text, bibliography and context are in the preserved review summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "CT-OW-02 allocated 106 premenopausal women diagnosed with telogen effluvium, 53 per group.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment", "missingness": "Diagnostic details, age, baseline hair, causes and applicability to other hair loss, men or postmenopausal women are unverified.", "uncertainty": "External abstract, full text, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculation, content review or clinical checks", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Eligibility, diagnosis and baseline-characteristic tables" }, { "item_id": "N03", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpoint", "question": "What are the actual finished product and study exposure?", "needed": "Olistic Women finished product, formulation, study exposure and duration", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition exposing direct original material, formulation, comparison, denominators and gaps for the selected endpoint", "application_exception": "Do not fill unverified selected material with other endpoints, formulations, trials or person/eye/measurement units", "criterion": "Olistic Women finished product, formulation, study exposure and duration; preserve original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, assessments, calculations or independent certification", "basis": "Retain the production copy of existing methodology application records and methodology linkage; full definition review and official certification are incomplete", "condition_origin": "New production condition; existing-content review and automatic verification-process passage are incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish finished-product identity from actual exposure and guidance", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original text, bibliography and context are in the preserved review summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "Exposure to one 25-mL vial/day of the Olistic Women drinkable multi-ingredient nutraceutical for six months is recorded.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment", "missingness": "This preserves study identity, not intake guidance or product recommendations. Full ingredients, batches and adherence details are absent from the summary.", "uncertainty": "External abstract, full text, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculation, content review or clinical checks", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Finished-product, ingredient, batch and study-exposure specifications" }, { "item_id": "N04", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpoint", "question": "Are placebo composition, appearance and blinding verified?", "needed": "Product/placebo composition, matching and blinding implementation", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition exposing direct original material, formulation, comparison, denominators and gaps for the selected endpoint", "application_exception": "Do not fill unverified selected material with other endpoints, formulations, trials or person/eye/measurement units", "criterion": "Product/placebo composition, matching and blinding implementation; preserve original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, assessments, calculations or independent certification", "basis": "Retain the production copy of existing methodology application records and methodology linkage; full definition review and official certification are incomplete", "condition_origin": "New production condition; existing-content review and automatic verification-process passage are incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish the design name from actual blinding implementation", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original text, bibliography and context are in the preserved review summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The trial was multicenter, double-blind and placebo-controlled; the company supplied product and placebo.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment", "missingness": "Placebo ingredients, appearance/sensory properties and blinding success/unblinding details are unread. Do not newly certify complete matching.", "uncertainty": "External abstract, full text, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculation, content review or clinical checks", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Active/placebo specifications and blinding methods" }, { "item_id": "N05", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpoint", "question": "Are allocation, analysis, completion and missing-data denominators separated?", "needed": "106 allocated, 53/53, measurements/analysis/exclusions by timepoint", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition exposing direct original material, formulation, comparison, denominators and gaps for the selected endpoint", "application_exception": "Do not fill unverified selected material with other endpoints, formulations, trials or person/eye/measurement units", "criterion": "106 allocated, 53/53, measurements/analysis/exclusions by timepoint; preserve original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, assessments, calculations or independent certification", "basis": "Retain the production copy of existing methodology application records and methodology linkage; full definition review and official certification are incomplete", "condition_origin": "New production condition; existing-content review and automatic verification-process passage are incomplete", "proposed_research": "Separate allocation from actually observed and analyzed denominators", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original text, bibliography and context are in the preserved review summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The original evidence lists 106 randomized (53/53).", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment", "missingness": "Measured, analyzed, completed and dropout denominators at days 90/180 are absent from the summary. Do not turn 106 allocated into an analysis denominator with all participants completing.", "uncertainty": "External abstract, full text, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculation, content review or clinical checks", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Group flow, analysis and measurement tables by timepoint" }, { "item_id": "N06", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpoint", "question": "What is the original record scope for random-sequence generation and allocation concealment?", "needed": "Sequence, concealment, baseline, actual implementation and original descriptions", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition exposing direct original material, formulation, comparison, denominators and gaps for the selected endpoint", "application_exception": "Do not fill unverified selected material with other endpoints, formulations, trials or person/eye/measurement units", "criterion": "Sequence, concealment, baseline, actual implementation and original descriptions; preserve original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, assessments, calculations or independent certification", "basis": "Retain the production copy of existing methodology application records and methodology linkage; full definition review and official certification are incomplete", "condition_origin": "New production condition; existing-content review and automatic verification-process passage are incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish historically unverified methods from current summary reading", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original text, bibliography and context are in the preserved review summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The preserved research explanation says random-sequence generation and allocation-concealment methods were not confirmed in the public paper.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment", "missingness": "This does not mean the external paper was read now. Do not use parent B1 or the design name as new methods review or allocation certification.", "uncertainty": "External abstract, full text, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculation, content review or clinical checks", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Original allocation/concealment, baseline and methods material" }, { "item_id": "N07", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpoint", "question": "Are missing-data handling, analysis populations and effects of interest known?", "needed": "Group exclusions, missingness, ITT/PP, models and adjustment", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition exposing direct original material, formulation, comparison, denominators and gaps for the selected endpoint", "application_exception": "Do not fill unverified selected material with other endpoints, formulations, trials or person/eye/measurement units", "criterion": "Group exclusions, missingness, ITT/PP, models and adjustment; preserve original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, assessments, calculations or independent certification", "basis": "Retain the production copy of existing methodology application records and methodology linkage; full definition review and official certification are incomplete", "condition_origin": "New production condition; existing-content review and automatic verification-process passage are incomplete", "proposed_research": "Separate allocation, actual use, completers and missing-data assumptions", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original text, bibliography and context are in the preserved review summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The original summary says detailed missing-data handling was not confirmed in the public paper.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment", "missingness": "Do not arbitrarily label analysis populations, adjustment, imputation or completer effects. Do not fill gaps with allocation denominators.", "uncertainty": "External abstract, full text, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculation, content review or clinical checks", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Analysis-population, missing-data, model and sensitivity material" }, { "item_id": "N08", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpoint", "question": "Can concurrent treatment, changes in hair-loss causes and product adherence be distinguished?", "needed": "Concurrent treatment, nutrition, other products, causes, changes and adherence", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition exposing direct original material, formulation, comparison, denominators and gaps for the selected endpoint", "application_exception": "Do not fill unverified selected material with other endpoints, formulations, trials or person/eye/measurement units", "criterion": "Concurrent treatment, nutrition, other products, causes, changes and adherence; preserve original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, assessments, calculations or independent certification", "basis": "Retain the production copy of existing methodology application records and methodology linkage; full definition review and official certification are incomplete", "condition_origin": "New production condition; existing-content review and automatic verification-process passage are incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish finished-product effects from other possible changes", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original text, bibliography and context are in the preserved review summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The current preserved summary gives a finished-product/placebo comparison and six months.", "condition_status": "Unverified", "status_reason": "Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment", "missingness": "Concurrent exposure, changes in disease causes, adherence and between-group deviations are unspecified. Do not claim product contribution was separated from other changes or provide treatment-change methods.", "uncertainty": "External abstract, full text, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculation, content review or clinical checks", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Group tables of concomitant exposure, adherence, changes and baseline causes" }, { "item_id": "N09", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpoint", "question": "What are the primary endpoint’s measurement, unit and definition?", "needed": "TrichoScan phototrichoscopy, change from baseline in density and hairs/cm²", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition exposing direct original material, formulation, comparison, denominators and gaps for the selected endpoint", "application_exception": "Do not fill unverified selected material with other endpoints, formulations, trials or person/eye/measurement units", "criterion": "TrichoScan phototrichoscopy, change from baseline in density and hairs/cm²; preserve original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, assessments, calculations or independent certification", "basis": "Retain the production copy of existing methodology application records and methodology linkage; full definition review and official certification are incomplete", "condition_origin": "New production condition; existing-content review and automatic verification-process passage are incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish device-measured density from patient-centered outcomes", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original text, bibliography and context are in the preserved review summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The primary endpoint was change from baseline in hair density measured by TrichoScan phototrichoscopy.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment", "missingness": "It differs from appearance, satisfaction and patient perception. Imaging site/area, device, assessors, standardization and repeated-measurement handling details are unread.", "uncertainty": "External abstract, full text, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculation, content review or clinical checks", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Imaging, measurement, unit and assessment manuals and original tables" }, { "item_id": "N10", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpoint", "question": "Do day-180 changes by group differ from final density?", "needed": "Baseline, change and final values for each group and definition of ±", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition exposing direct original material, formulation, comparison, denominators and gaps for the selected endpoint", "application_exception": "Do not fill unverified selected material with other endpoints, formulations, trials or person/eye/measurement units", "criterion": "Baseline, change and final values for each group and definition of ±; preserve original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, assessments, calculations or independent certification", "basis": "Retain the production copy of existing methodology application records and methodology linkage; full definition review and official certification are incomplete", "condition_origin": "New production condition; existing-content review and automatic verification-process passage are incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish changes, absolute values, dispersion and precision", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original text, bibliography and context are in the preserved review summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "Day-180 change is recorded as product +27.31±2.61 versus placebo +18.23±2.98 hairs/cm².", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment", "missingness": "Do not turn changes into final density. The summary does not identify ± as SD or SE; do not calculate baseline/final values or new between-group differences.", "uncertainty": "External abstract, full text, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculation, content review or clinical checks", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Original group baseline/change/final-value tables and ± definitions" }, { "item_id": "N11", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpoint", "question": "What are the test and confidence interval for the selected between-group comparison?", "needed": "Day-180 comparison, effect scale, P value and CI", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition exposing direct original material, formulation, comparison, denominators and gaps for the selected endpoint", "application_exception": "Do not fill unverified selected material with other endpoints, formulations, trials or person/eye/measurement units", "criterion": "Day-180 comparison, effect scale, P value and CI; preserve original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, assessments, calculations or independent certification", "basis": "Retain the production copy of existing methodology application records and methodology linkage; full definition review and official certification are incomplete", "condition_origin": "New production condition; existing-content review and automatic verification-process passage are incomplete", "proposed_research": "Display directly reported tests together with gaps in effects/CIs", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original text, bibliography and context are in the preserved review summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The preserved summary gives P<0.01 for the day-180 hair-density comparison and says the 95% CI was not reported.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment", "missingness": "Do not create new differences, CIs, relative density or hypothetical examples. Unreported effect intervals must not become confirmed precision.", "uncertainty": "External abstract, full text, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculation, content review or clinical checks", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Original between-group effect, test and interval tables" }, { "item_id": "N12", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpoint", "question": "Does an important clinical difference explain the device measurement?", "needed": "Prespecified hairs/cm² importance, direct perception and clinical criteria", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition exposing direct original material, formulation, comparison, denominators and gaps for the selected endpoint", "application_exception": "Do not fill unverified selected material with other endpoints, formulations, trials or person/eye/measurement units", "criterion": "Prespecified hairs/cm² importance, direct perception and clinical criteria; preserve original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, assessments, calculations or independent certification", "basis": "Retain the production copy of existing methodology application records and methodology linkage; full definition review and official certification are incomplete", "condition_origin": "New production condition; existing-content review and automatic verification-process passage are incomplete", "proposed_research": "Separate statistical values from clinical importance", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original text, bibliography and context are in the preserved review summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The preserved counterview says a clinically important minimum hairs/cm² threshold was not reported.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment", "missingness": "Do not invent an important difference, normalized hair fullness or a visible-change criterion.", "uncertainty": "External abstract, full text, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculation, content review or clinical checks", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Prespecified importance criteria and direct appearance/perception results" }, { "item_id": "N13", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpoint", "question": "Was the day-90 result counted as independent replication or merged with day 180?", "needed": "Values, denominators, plans and measurements by timepoint", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition exposing direct original material, formulation, comparison, denominators and gaps for the selected endpoint", "application_exception": "Do not fill unverified selected material with other endpoints, formulations, trials or person/eye/measurement units", "criterion": "Values, denominators, plans and measurements by timepoint; preserve original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, assessments, calculations or independent certification", "basis": "Retain the production copy of existing methodology application records and methodology linkage; full definition review and official certification are incomplete", "condition_origin": "New production condition; existing-content review and automatic verification-process passage are incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish direct timepoint data from shared participants and measurements", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original text, bibliography and context are in the preserved review summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The original description says between-group differences occurred at both days 90 and 180.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment", "missingness": "Exact day-90 values, P values, CIs and denominators are absent from the summary. Do not count repeat timepoints as new trials/participants or copy day-180 values.", "uncertainty": "External abstract, full text, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculation, content review or clinical checks", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Day-90/day-180 result and denominator tables" }, { "item_id": "N14", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpoint", "question": "Was the secondary hair-cycle ratio merged with density?", "needed": "Anagen-to-catagen/telogen ratio, hierarchy and definition", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition exposing direct original material, formulation, comparison, denominators and gaps for the selected endpoint", "application_exception": "Do not fill unverified selected material with other endpoints, formulations, trials or person/eye/measurement units", "criterion": "Anagen-to-catagen/telogen ratio, hierarchy and definition; preserve original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, assessments, calculations or independent certification", "basis": "Retain the production copy of existing methodology application records and methodology linkage; full definition review and official certification are incomplete", "condition_origin": "New production condition; existing-content review and automatic verification-process passage are incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish density, hair-cycle ratios and analysis hierarchy", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original text, bibliography and context are in the preserved review summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The original text gives a prespecified secondary ratio of product 8.20:1→14.19:1 versus placebo 7.43:1→8.76:1, P<0.001.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment", "missingness": "This differs from hair density in hairs/cm². Do not convert the ratio to density, individual hair counts or between-group differences or calculate new values.", "uncertainty": "External abstract, full text, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculation, content review or clinical checks", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Secondary-ratio definitions, plans and original tables" }, { "item_id": "N15", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpoint", "question": "Are first registration posting and primary-completion dates distinguished?", "needed": "NCT07111312, first posting, completion, original plans and history", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition exposing direct original material, formulation, comparison, denominators and gaps for the selected endpoint", "application_exception": "Do not fill unverified selected material with other endpoints, formulations, trials or person/eye/measurement units", "criterion": "NCT07111312, first posting, completion, original plans and history; preserve original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, assessments, calculations or independent certification", "basis": "Retain the production copy of existing methodology application records and methodology linkage; full definition review and official certification are incomplete", "condition_origin": "New production condition; existing-content review and automatic verification-process passage are incomplete", "proposed_research": "Display completion, registration and paper events separately", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original text, bibliography and context are in the preserved review summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "NCT07111312 was first posted on 2025-08-08; primary completion was 2024-05-10. The original text describes retrospective registration after completion, which cannot support prospective registration.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment", "missingness": "Do not newly calculate the date gap or promote retrospective registration to prerecruitment planning.", "uncertainty": "External abstract, full text, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculation, content review or clinical checks", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Registration history, prerecruitment plans and completion records" }, { "item_id": "N16", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpoint", "question": "Do original primary/secondary descriptions differ from independently prespecified plans?", "needed": "Endpoint hierarchy, protocol/SAP, multiplicity and change documents", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition exposing direct original material, formulation, comparison, denominators and gaps for the selected endpoint", "application_exception": "Do not fill unverified selected material with other endpoints, formulations, trials or person/eye/measurement units", "criterion": "Endpoint hierarchy, protocol/SAP, multiplicity and change documents; preserve original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, assessments, calculations or independent certification", "basis": "Retain the production copy of existing methodology application records and methodology linkage; full definition review and official certification are incomplete", "condition_origin": "New production condition; existing-content review and automatic verification-process passage are incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish paper hierarchy descriptions from the verified scope of independent prospective plans", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original text, bibliography and context are in the preserved review summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The preserved summary calls density primary and the hair-cycle ratio a prespecified secondary endpoint while also stating limits of retrospective registration.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment", "missingness": "Preserve the original hierarchy description without treating it as completed independent prospective verification. Original plans, changes and multiplicity are unread.", "uncertainty": "External abstract, full text, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculation, content review or clinical checks", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Protocol/SAP, prerecruitment documents and change history" }, { "item_id": "N17", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpoint", "question": "Does TrichoScan density mean visibly fuller hair?", "needed": "Direct appearance, satisfaction, perception and function endpoints", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition exposing direct original material, formulation, comparison, denominators and gaps for the selected endpoint", "application_exception": "Do not fill unverified selected material with other endpoints, formulations, trials or person/eye/measurement units", "criterion": "Direct appearance, satisfaction, perception and function endpoints; preserve original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, assessments, calculations or independent certification", "basis": "Retain the production copy of existing methodology application records and methodology linkage; full definition review and official certification are incomplete", "condition_origin": "New production condition; existing-content review and automatic verification-process passage are incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish device measurements from gaps in the separate appearance question", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original text, bibliography and context are in the preserved review summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The original text distinguishes TrichoScan hair counts from a patient judging hair to look fuller. The separate appearance subclaim has grade ?.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment", "missingness": "Do not fill appearance, perception, satisfaction or treatment success with a positive density result or newly change that subclaim assessment.", "uncertainty": "External abstract, full text, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculation, content review or clinical checks", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Direct patient-centered appearance, satisfaction and function material" }, { "item_id": "N18", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpoint", "question": "Was a finished-product effect extended to ingredients or other hair supplements?", "needed": "Direct comparisons for this product, other formulations and individual ingredients", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition exposing direct original material, formulation, comparison, denominators and gaps for the selected endpoint", "application_exception": "Do not fill unverified selected material with other endpoints, formulations, trials or person/eye/measurement units", "criterion": "Direct comparisons for this product, other formulations and individual ingredients; preserve original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, assessments, calculations or independent certification", "basis": "Retain the production copy of existing methodology application records and methodology linkage; full definition review and official certification are incomplete", "condition_origin": "New production condition; existing-content review and automatic verification-process passage are incomplete", "proposed_research": "Preserve applicability boundaries between this product and other product/ingredient questions", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original text, bibliography and context are in the preserved review summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The original advertising interpretation says ingredients, formulations and populations vary by product, so Olistic results cannot become effects of Viviscal, Nutrafol or all hair supplements.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment", "missingness": "Do not create ingredient-specific benefits, product equivalence or recommendations for other brands. Full original ingredient specifications are also absent from the summary.", "uncertainty": "External abstract, full text, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculation, content review or clinical checks", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Direct comparisons by finished product, formulation and ingredient" }, { "item_id": "N19", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpoint", "question": "Does six-month efficacy mean persistence after completion or prevention of all hair loss?", "needed": "Postcompletion follow-up, long-term density and clinical outcomes", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition exposing direct original material, formulation, comparison, denominators and gaps for the selected endpoint", "application_exception": "Do not fill unverified selected material with other endpoints, formulations, trials or person/eye/measurement units", "criterion": "Postcompletion follow-up, long-term density and clinical outcomes; preserve original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, assessments, calculations or independent certification", "basis": "Retain the production copy of existing methodology application records and methodology linkage; full definition review and official certification are incomplete", "condition_origin": "New production condition; existing-content review and automatic verification-process passage are incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish exposure-period results from direct postcompletion results", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original text, bibliography and context are in the preserved review summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The original trial lasted six months/180 days; the original counterpoint says it does not establish durability or effects of other formulations.", "condition_status": "Unverified", "status_reason": "Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment", "missingness": "Do not fill postcompletion persistence, disease prevention, treatment of all hair loss or treatment substitution with numbers.", "uncertainty": "External abstract, full text, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculation, content review or clinical checks", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Postcompletion density and clinical-outcome follow-up" }, { "item_id": "N20", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpoint", "question": "Are the same trial, citation, registration and two subclaims independent replication?", "needed": "CT-OW-02, paper, registration, shared participants and timepoint linkage", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition exposing direct original material, formulation, comparison, denominators and gaps for the selected endpoint", "application_exception": "Do not fill unverified selected material with other endpoints, formulations, trials or person/eye/measurement units", "criterion": "CT-OW-02, paper, registration, shared participants and timepoint linkage; preserve original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, assessments, calculations or independent certification", "basis": "Retain the production copy of existing methodology application records and methodology linkage; full definition review and official certification are incomplete", "condition_origin": "New production condition; existing-content review and automatic verification-process passage are incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish endpoint/report slots from trial/participant units", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original text, bibliography and context are in the preserved review summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The original material links one trial in 106 people, one citation and NCT07111312. Density, hair-cycle ratios, days 90/180 and the appearance sibling row share the same report context.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment", "missingness": "Do not count the paper, registration, timepoints, two groups or sibling sheets as new independent trials/participants. Confirmed trial/participant counts remain unrecorded.", "uncertainty": "External abstract, full text, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculation, content review or clinical checks", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Report, registration, measurement and participant-linkage material" }, { "item_id": "N21", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpoint", "question": "Is there independent replication beyond one small manufacturer trial?", "needed": "Actual independent replication of the same finished product, population and duration", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition exposing direct original material, formulation, comparison, denominators and gaps for the selected endpoint", "application_exception": "Do not fill unverified selected material with other endpoints, formulations, trials or person/eye/measurement units", "criterion": "Actual independent replication of the same finished product, population and duration; preserve original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, assessments, calculations or independent certification", "basis": "Retain the production copy of existing methodology application records and methodology linkage; full definition review and official certification are incomplete", "condition_origin": "New production condition; existing-content review and automatic verification-process passage are incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish original sample-size limits from gaps in independent replication", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original text, bibliography and context are in the preserved review summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The original rationale describes one trial in 106 people (53/53), the limitation of fewer than 200 participants and manufacturer-only evidence.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment", "missingness": "Do not turn the 200-person statement into an arbitrary passing sample size or new importance criterion. Do not newly certify independent replication or applicability to other conditions.", "uncertainty": "External abstract, full text, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculation, content review or clinical checks", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Direct replication/applicability material for the same question" }, { "item_id": "N22", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpoint", "question": "Are research funding, publication fees and product/placebo support separated?", "needed": "Company funding, publication fees and product/placebo supply disclosures", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition exposing direct original material, formulation, comparison, denominators and gaps for the selected endpoint", "application_exception": "Do not fill unverified selected material with other endpoints, formulations, trials or person/eye/measurement units", "criterion": "Company funding, publication fees and product/placebo supply disclosures; preserve original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, assessments, calculations or independent certification", "basis": "Retain the production copy of existing methodology application records and methodology linkage; full definition review and official certification are incomplete", "condition_origin": "New production condition; existing-content review and automatic verification-process passage are incomplete", "proposed_research": "Display research costs, publication fees and product support separately", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original text, bibliography and context are in the preserved review summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The original text says Olistic Research Labs S.L. fully funded research and publication fees and supplied product and placebo.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment", "missingness": "Do not turn manufacturer support into public or independent support. Specific contracts, batches and other roles are unread.", "uncertainty": "External abstract, full text, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculation, content review or clinical checks", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Funding, publication-fee and product/placebo disclosures and contracts" }, { "item_id": "N23", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpoint", "question": "Are sponsor, responsible party and company-employed author distinguished?", "needed": "Responsibility, registrant, author relationships/contributions and data rights", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition exposing direct original material, formulation, comparison, denominators and gaps for the selected endpoint", "application_exception": "Do not fill unverified selected material with other endpoints, formulations, trials or person/eye/measurement units", "criterion": "Responsibility, registrant, author relationships/contributions and data rights; preserve original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, assessments, calculations or independent certification", "basis": "Retain the production copy of existing methodology application records and methodology linkage; full definition review and official certification are incomplete", "condition_origin": "New production condition; existing-content review and automatic verification-process passage are incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish support, responsibility, employees and individual roles", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original text, bibliography and context are in the preserved review summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The original text says the company was sponsor/responsible party and Manuel Sáez Moya was affiliated with the company.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment", "missingness": "Do not turn responsibility or employee authorship into independent operations. Full individual contributions, data control and publication authority are unverified.", "uncertainty": "External abstract, full text, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculation, content review or clinical checks", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Registrant, author COI, contribution and authority disclosures" }, { "item_id": "N24", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpoint", "question": "Were all outsourced analysis, medical writing and editing roles verified?", "needed": "Actual disclosures of analysis, writing, editing and other support", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition exposing direct original material, formulation, comparison, denominators and gaps for the selected endpoint", "application_exception": "Do not fill unverified selected material with other endpoints, formulations, trials or person/eye/measurement units", "criterion": "Actual disclosures of analysis, writing, editing and other support; preserve original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, assessments, calculations or independent certification", "basis": "Retain the production copy of existing methodology application records and methodology linkage; full definition review and official certification are incomplete", "condition_origin": "New production condition; existing-content review and automatic verification-process passage are incomplete", "proposed_research": "Record reported involvement separately from unverified roles", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original text, bibliography and context are in the preserved review summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "Research/publication costs, product/placebo supply and some responsibility/affiliation information are preserved.", "condition_status": "Unverified", "status_reason": "Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment", "missingness": "Do not certify unmentioned outsourced analysis, medical writing, editing or other roles as absent or fully independent.", "uncertainty": "External abstract, full text, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculation, content review or clinical checks", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Full support, analysis, writing, data and publication-role disclosures" }, { "item_id": "N25", "question_type": "Supplementary harm evidence", "question": "Are noncollection and nonreporting of minor adverse events distinguished?", "needed": "Harm collection/classification, group observations and exposure denominators", "role": "Supplementary", "role_reason": "Supplementary condition exposing harm-collection, denominator and follow-up limits separately from efficacy", "application_exception": "Do not fill unverified selected material with other endpoints, formulations, trials or person/eye/measurement units", "criterion": "Harm collection/classification, group observations and exposure denominators; preserve original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, assessments, calculations or independent certification", "basis": "Retain the production copy of existing methodology application records and methodology linkage; full definition review and official certification are incomplete", "condition_origin": "New production condition; existing-content review and automatic verification-process passage are incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish noncollection from observed zero events and nonreporting", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original text, bibliography and context are in the preserved review summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The original research explanation and safety detail explicitly say minor adverse events were not collected at all.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment", "missingness": "Do not turn noncollection into zero events, no problems or good general tolerability. Parent safety Unknown is the original record.", "uncertainty": "External abstract, full text, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculation, content review or clinical checks", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Full harm-collection scope, group events and exposure tables" }, { "item_id": "N26", "question_type": "Supplementary harm evidence", "question": "Are serious-harm, discontinuation and relatedness material available?", "needed": "Serious events, discontinuation/reasons, relatedness, control and denominators", "role": "Supplementary", "role_reason": "Supplementary condition exposing harm-collection, denominator and follow-up limits separately from efficacy", "application_exception": "Do not fill unverified selected material with other endpoints, formulations, trials or person/eye/measurement units", "criterion": "Serious events, discontinuation/reasons, relatedness, control and denominators; preserve original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, assessments, calculations or independent certification", "basis": "Retain the production copy of existing methodology application records and methodology linkage; full definition review and official certification are incomplete", "condition_origin": "New production condition; existing-content review and automatic verification-process passage are incomplete", "proposed_research": "Display collection limits separately from gaps in other harm material", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original text, bibliography and context are in the preserved review summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The summary explicitly states minor adverse events were not collected and this trial alone cannot establish safety.", "condition_status": "Unverified", "status_reason": "Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment", "missingness": "Full serious-event tables, group denominators, relatedness and discontinuation material are absent from the summary; do not create absence or safety equivalence.", "uncertainty": "External abstract, full text, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculation, content review or clinical checks", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Serious-event, discontinuation, relatedness and group-denominator material" }, { "item_id": "N27", "question_type": "Supplementary harm evidence", "question": "Can long-term/rare harms or tolerability in other populations be judged?", "needed": "Long exposure, rare events, vulnerable populations and follow-up", "role": "Supplementary", "role_reason": "Supplementary condition exposing harm-collection, denominator and follow-up limits separately from efficacy", "application_exception": "Do not fill unverified selected material with other endpoints, formulations, trials or person/eye/measurement units", "criterion": "Long exposure, rare events, vulnerable populations and follow-up; preserve original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, assessments, calculations or independent certification", "basis": "Retain the production copy of existing methodology application records and methodology linkage; full definition review and official certification are incomplete", "condition_origin": "New production condition; existing-content review and automatic verification-process passage are incomplete", "proposed_research": "Distinguish short-term efficacy values from gaps in long-term safety", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original text, bibliography and context are in the preserved review summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The original trial lasted six months and harm collection was incomplete.", "condition_status": "Unverified", "status_reason": "Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment", "missingness": "Do not fill absence of long-term/rare harms, safety in other sexes/hair-loss conditions/ages or general tolerability.", "uncertainty": "External abstract, full text, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculation, content review or clinical checks", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Long-term/rare-event and population-specific exposure/harm material" }, { "item_id": "N28", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpoint", "question": "Are the actually read summary and external abstract/full text/registration/plans shown?", "needed": "Preserved summary, citation URL and actual reading status by material", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition exposing direct original material, formulation, comparison, denominators and gaps for the selected endpoint", "application_exception": "Do not fill unverified selected material with other endpoints, formulations, trials or person/eye/measurement units", "criterion": "Preserved summary, citation URL and actual reading status by material; preserve original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, assessments, calculations or independent certification", "basis": "Retain the production copy of existing methodology application records and methodology linkage; full definition review and official certification are incomplete", "condition_origin": "New production condition; existing-content review and automatic verification-process passage are incomplete", "proposed_research": "Display summary reading and unread external material separately", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original text, bibliography and context are in the preserved review summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "The full preserved summary was actually read; the PubMed URL is linked as an original bibliographic reference.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment", "missingness": "External abstracts, full texts, registration, protocol/SAP, links and screens were not checked. Do not turn URL presence or historical original-text descriptions into new external reading or content review.", "uncertainty": "External abstract, full text, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculation, content review or clinical checks", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Original paper, registration and protocol/SAP" }, { "item_id": "N29", "question_type": "Comparative efficacy: finished product and selected endpoint", "question": "Are original history, parent values and linkage separated from production and review of existing content?", "needed": "Korean/English text, axes, dates, corrections, existing selection and freeze/application", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Production condition exposing direct original material, formulation, comparison, denominators and gaps for the selected endpoint", "application_exception": "Do not fill unverified selected material with other endpoints, formulations, trials or person/eye/measurement units", "criterion": "Korean/English text, axes, dates, corrections, existing selection and freeze/application; preserve original values, direct observations, scope and gaps without creating new effects, assessments, calculations or independent certification", "basis": "Retain the production copy of existing methodology application records and methodology linkage; full definition review and official certification are incomplete", "condition_origin": "New production condition; existing-content review and automatic verification-process passage are incomplete", "proposed_research": "Record original assessment/corrections separately from production and review of existing content", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Related original text, bibliography and context are in the preserved review summary; detailed external material is unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; related external material unread", "observation": "Preserve Korean/English text, axes, the 2026-08-26 evidence date, empty correction/deliberation records and subclaims in the full original summary. Existing review-pending/production-eligibility indicators are historical.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Display preserved-summary information, scope and direct gaps in production; this is not completed content review or a new clinical assessment", "missingness": "Retain absent subclaim scores/status/axes; the evidence date is not a current review date. The existing review wait is not activated, content review remains incomplete, completion is false, new units are zero and final independent counts are unrecorded.", "uncertainty": "External abstract, full text, registration, protocol and SAP unread; no new calculation, content review or clinical checks", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Original preserved summary, existing selection and freeze/application production events" } ], "reports": [ { "report_id": "R01", "title": "Sáez Moya M, et al. Efficacy and Safety of a Drinkable Nutraceutical in Premenopausal Women with Telogen Effluvium. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025. PMID: 41288927.", "url": "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41288927/", "report_type": "Preserved summary of trial-paper bibliography", "existence": "Present in the actual bibliography, evidence list and related text of the preserved summary", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external abstracts, full texts, registration and plans unread", "independent_replication": "Original-report linkage and company/timepoint context; no certification of independent trials or confirmed participant counts", "observed_result": "+27.31±2.61 versus +18.23±2.98 hairs/cm², P<0.01; 95% CI not reported", "result_level": "Six-month TrichoScan hair density with the CT-OW-02 finished product; distinct from appearance, long-term outcomes and other products", "source_evidence_date": "2026-08-26", "materials": [ { "material_type": "Stored summary", "public_status": "Summary read", "access_status": "Stored summary read", "acquired": true, "actually_read": "Summary read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "Material slot; no certification of external acquisition/reading/link checks or independent-trial counts" }, { "material_type": "External abstract", "public_status": "Not read", "access_status": "External material unread", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "Material slot; no certification of external acquisition/reading/link checks or independent-trial counts" }, { "material_type": "External full text", "public_status": "Not read", "access_status": "External material unread", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "Material slot; no certification of external acquisition/reading/link checks or independent-trial counts" }, { "material_type": "Original registration", "public_status": "Not read", "access_status": "External material unread", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "Material slot; no certification of external acquisition/reading/link checks or independent-trial counts" }, { "material_type": "Protocol/SAP", "public_status": "Not read", "access_status": "External material unread", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "Material slot; no certification of external acquisition/reading/link checks or independent-trial counts" } ], "links": [ { "label": "PubMed", "url": "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41288927/" } ] } ], "method_sources": [ { "id": "M03", "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08", "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-03", "section": "§3.1, §3.2.1–3.2.3, MECIR C5/C7/C13", "official_principle": "Clearly record the question, eligibility conditions and reasons for changes, and distinguish variations in interventions.", "review_level": "Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited" }, { "id": "M04", "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5.1 (2025), chapter updated 2025-03", "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-04", "section": "§4.5, §4.6.1–4.6.3, MECIR C42", "official_principle": "Distinguish studies from reports and link them; do not omit a study solely because results are unreported.", "review_level": "Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited" }, { "id": "M08", "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10", "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-08", "section": "§8.1–8.2.3, Table 8.2.a", "official_principle": "Define the outcome and effect of interest, then examine randomization, deviations, missing data, measurement and selective reporting.", "review_level": "Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited" }, { "id": "M15", "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08", "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-15", "section": "§15.2.4, §15.3.1–15.3.3", "official_principle": "Distinguish effect estimates, intervals, importance and applicability. Sample size alone does not determine precision.", "review_level": "Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited" }, { "id": "M19", "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10", "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-19", "section": "§19.1.2, §19.2.1–19.2.4", "official_principle": "Harm questions may require different designs, populations and follow-up from efficacy questions. Case reports do not establish incidence rates.", "review_level": "Preserved methodological linkages reused for production; no current methodological reassessment or external link checks, and historical quality review is not inherited" } ], "status_dictionary": { "Partly verified": "Some information exists in the preserved review summary; detailed original materials remain unverified. This does not certify a passed review or clinical efficacy.", "Unverified": "Detailed materials for the selected condition could not be established within the stored scope; this does not mean zero effect, zero studies or safety", "Review incomplete": "Review of existing content incomplete", "Met": "Use only within the relevant conditions after existing content review; no automatic designation in this preparation", "Not reported": "Distinguish only within materials actually read; do not turn unread external materials into unreported findings", "Inaccessible": "Not applied during this preparation because actual access was not tested", "Not applicable": "Use with a reason for non-applicability based on an explicit question boundary", "Conflicting data": "Judge after actual material comparison; review was not performed during this preparation", "Insufficient evidence for the conditions": "Do not use as a clinical grade encompassing currently unread materials" }, "study_overlap": { "state": "Unverified", "unique_trial_count": null, "unique_participant_count": null, "reason": "Two groups, days 90/180, endpoints, registration and sibling rows of one CT-OW-02; do not sum as independent replication" }, "history": [ { "date": "2026-10-12", "kind": "Separation of public-facing pages and materials", "view_version": "1.0", "change": "Public pages and materials were created from the existing 29 items. No new clinical search, verification-status change or scoring was performed." } ], "language": "en", "translation_date": "2026-10-12" }